Transplantation of hematopoietic progenitors in myelofibrosis.

The objective of this work is to generate recommendations on the management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in primary myelofibrosis (PMF). A comprehensive systematic review of articles published between 1999 and 2015 (January) was used as a source of scientific evidence. The recommendations were produced through a Delphi process involving a panel of 23 experts appointed by the European LeukemiaNet and the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group. Key questions included patient selection, donor selection, pre-transplant management, conditioning regimen, post-transplant management, prevention, and management of post-transplant relapse. Patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk disease and age < 70 years should be considered candidates for allo-SCT. Patients with intermediate-risk 1 disease and age < 65 years should be considered candidates if they have refractory transfusion-dependent anemia, or a peripheral blood (PB) blast percentage > 2%, or adverse cytogenetics. Splenectomy before transplantation must be decided on a case-by-case basis. Patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk disease who lack a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or unrelated donor should be enrolled in a protocol that uses HLA non-identical donors. PB was considered the most appropriate source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplants from HLA-matched unrelated donors and siblings. The optimal intensity of the conditioning regimen has yet to be defined. Strategies such as discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs, infusion of donor lymphocytes, or both were considered adequate to prevent clinical relapse. In conclusion, we provide consensus-based recommendations aimed at optimizing allo-SCT in PMF. Unmet clinical needs were highlighted.

El objetivo de este trabajo es generar recomendaciones sobre el manejo del trasplante alogénico de células madre (alo-SCT) en la mielofibrosis primaria (MFP). Se utilizó una revisión sistemática integral de artículos publicados entre 1999 y 2015 (enero) como fuente de evidencia científica. Las recomendaciones se produjeron mediante un proceso Delphi en el que participó un panel de 23 expertos designados por la European LeukemiaNet y el European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group. Las preguntas clave incluyeron la selección de pacientes, la selección de donantes, el manejo previo al trasplante, el régimen de acondicionamiento, el manejo posterior al trasplante, la prevención y el manejo de la recaída después del trasplante. Los pacientes con enfermedad de riesgo intermedio 2 o alto y edad < 70 años deben ser considerados candidatos para alo-SCT. Los pacientes con enfermedad de riesgo intermedio 1 y edad < 65 años deben ser considerados candidatos si presentan anemia refractaria dependiente de transfusiones, o un porcentaje de blastos en sangre periférica > 2%, o citogenética adversa. La esplenectomía previa al trasplante debe decidirse caso por caso. Los pacientes con enfermedad de riesgo intermedio 2 o alto que carecen de un hermano compatible con el antígeno leucocitario humano (HLA) o de un donante no emparentado deben inscribirse en un protocolo que utilice donantes no idénticos de HLA. PB se consideró la fuente más apropiada de células madre hematopoyéticas para trasplantes de hermanos y donantes no emparentados compatibles con HLA. La intensidad óptima del régimen de acondicionamiento aún debe definirse. Se consideraron adecuadas estrategias como la suspensión de los fármacos inmunosupresores, la infusión de linfocitos del donante o ambas para evitar la recaída clínica. En conclusión, proporcionamos recomendaciones basadas en consenso destinadas a optimizar el alo-SCT en MFP. Se destacaron las necesidades clínicas insatisfechas.

Essential thrombocythaemia.

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a chronic Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm that has its main involvement in the megakaryopoietic lineage, generating sustained thrombocytosis in peripheral blood and an increase in the number of mature megakaryocytes in the bone marrow. In addition to marked thrombocytosis, it is characterized by increased thrombotic or hemorrhagic risk and the presence of constitutional symptoms. Patients with ET have a low but known risk of disease progression to myelofibrosis and/or acute leukemia. The diagnosis is made based on the 2016 WHO criteria. At present, available treatments for patients with ET are mainly aimed at minimizing the risk of thrombosis and/or bleeding.

La trombocitemia esencial (TE) es una neoplasia mieloproliferativa crónica Filadelfia negativa que tiene su principal involucro en la línea megacariopoyética, generando trombocitosis sostenida en la sangre periférica y un incremento en el número de megacariocitos maduros en médula ósea. Además de una marcada trombocitosis, se caracteriza por un mayor riesgo trombótico o hemorrágico y la presencia de síntomas constitucionales. Los pacientes con TE tienen un riesgo bajo, pero conocido, de evolución de la enfermedad a mielofibrosis y/o leucemia aguda. El diagnóstico se realiza con base en los criterios de la Organización Mundial de la Salud del 2016. Los tratamientos actualmente disponibles para los pacientes con TE están dirigidos principalmente a minimizar el riesgo de trombosis y/o hemorragia.

Pregnancy in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are associated with a significant risk of thrombosis and the hypercoagulable environment of pregnancy increases this risk. The most frequent gestational complications consist of spontaneous abortion, thrombosis, bleeding, and hypertensive disease of pregnancy. Treatment depends on thrombotic risk, gestational trimester, and myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Las neoplasias mieloproliferativas (NMP) están asociadas a un riesgo notable de trombosis y el entorno de hipercoagulabilidad propio del embarazo aumenta este riesgo. Las complicaciones gestacionales más frecuentes consisten en: aborto espontáneo, trombosis, sangrado y enfermedad hipertensiva del embarazo. El tratamiento depende del riesgo trombótico, trimestre gestacional y neoplasia mieloproliferativa.

Polycythemia vera.

Polycythemia vera (PV) is mainly characterized by erythrocytosis, thrombotic and hemorrhagic predisposition, a variety of symptoms, and cumulative risks of fibrotic progression and/or leukemic evolution over time. The diagnosis is made based on the 2016 WHO criteria. The treatment of PV focuses on rapidly reducing the erythrocyte mass, either by means of phlebotomies or with cytoreductive treatment, and the reduction of thrombotic risk by correcting cardiovascular risk factors and the use of platelet antiaggregants.

La policitemia vera (PV) se caracteriza principalmente por eritrocitosis, predisposición trombótica y hemorrágica, una variedad de síntomas y riesgos acumulativos de progresión fibrótica y/o evolución leucémica a lo largo del tiempo. El diagnóstico se realiza con base en los criterios de la Organización Mundial de la Salud del 2016. El tratamiento de la PV se centra en reducir rápidamente la masa eritrocitaria, ya sea por medio de flebotomías o con tratamiento citorreductor, y la disminución del riesgo trombótico mediante la corrección de factores de riesgo cardiovascular y el uso de antiagregantes plaquetarios.

Symptom control.

In addition to symptoms secondary to splenomegaly, microvascular abnormalities, and thrombohemorrhagic complications, patients with MPN may experience a significant symptom burden attributed to an increase in circulating inflammatory cytokines. These symptoms can be severe and limit quality of life. Therefore, in addition to the prevention of complications, one of the objectives of the treatment of MPN is the control of symptoms.

Además de la sintomatología secundaria a la esplenomegalia, a las alteraciones microvasculares y a las complicaciones trombohemorrágicas, los pacientes con neoplasias mieloproliferativas (NMP) pueden experimentar una importante carga sintomática atribuida a un aumento de citocinas inflamatorias circulantes. Estos síntomas pueden ser severos y limitar la calidad de vida. Por ello, además de la prevención de las complicaciones, uno de los objetivos del tratamiento de las NMP es el control de los síntomas.

Thrombotic events.

Major thrombotic complications in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) represent an important clinical problem due to their high morbidity, the complexity of their management, and their associated mortality. The appearance of a thrombosis implies a high thrombotic risk stratification of the MPN and determines the initiation or optimization of cytoreductive treatment and the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy as secondary prophylaxis. The incidence of thrombosis at the time of diagnosis is higher than during the course of the disease, being located in the arterial territory in 60-70% of cases. Once thrombosis has occurred, up to 20-33% of patients experience thrombotic recurrence in the same initial vascular territory.

Las complicaciones trombóticas mayores en las neoplasias mieloproliferativas (NMP) representan un importante problema clínico debido a su elevada morbilidad, la complejidad de su manejo y su mortalidad asociada. La aparición de una trombosis comporta una estratificación de alto riesgo trombótico de la NMP y determina el inicio o la optimización del tratamiento citorreductor y el uso de terapia antiplaquetaria o anticoagulante como profilaxis secundaria. La incidencia de trombosis en el momento del diagnóstico es mayor que durante la evolución de la enfermedad, localizándose en territorio arterial en el 60-70% casos. Una vez se ha producido una trombosis, hasta el 20-33% de los pacientes sufre una recurrencia trombótica en el mismo territorio vascular inicial.

Myelofibrosis: diagnosis and treatment.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal myeloproliferation, dysregulated kinase signaling, and release of abnormal cytokines. In recent years, important progress has been made in the knowledge of the molecular biology and the prognostic assessment of MF. Conventional treatment has limited impact on the patients' survival; it includes a wait-and-see approach for asymptomatic patients, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, androgens, or immunomodulatory agents for anemia, cytoreductive drugs such as hydroxyurea for the splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, and splenectomy or radiotherapy in selected patients. The discovery of the Janus kinase (JAK) 2 mutation triggered the development of molecular targeted therapy of MF. The JAK inhibitors are effective in both JAK2-positive and JAK2-negative MF; one of them, ruxolitinib, is the current best available therapy for MF splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. Although ruxolitinib has changed the therapeutic scenario of MF, there is no clear indication of a disease-modifying effect. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative therapy of MF, but due to its associated morbidity and mortality, it is usually restricted to eligible high- and intermediate-2-risk MF patients. To improve current therapeutic results, the combination of JAK inhibitors with other agents is currently being tested, and newer drugs are being investigated.

La mielofibrosis (MF) es una neoplasia mieloproliferativa negativa para BCR-ABL1 caracterizada por mieloproliferación clonal, señalización de cinasa desregulada y liberación de citocinas anormales. En los últimos años se han realizado importantes avances en el conocimiento de la biología molecular y la valoración pronóstica de la MF. El tratamiento convencional tiene un impacto limitado en la supervivencia de los pacientes; incluye un enfoque de espera para pacientes asintomáticos, agentes estimulantes de la eritropoyesis, andrógenos o agentes inmunomoduladores para la anemia, fármacos citorreductores como la hidroxiurea para la esplenomegalia y los síntomas constitucionales, y esplenectomía o radioterapia en pacientes seleccionados. El descubrimiento de la mutación Janus cinasa (JAK) 2 desencadenó el desarrollo de la terapia dirigida molecular de la MF. Los inhibidores de JAK son efectivos tanto en MF con JAK2 positivo como con JAK2 negativo; uno de ellos, el ruxolitinib, es la mejor terapia disponible actualmente para la esplenomegalia y los síntomas constitucionales de la MF. Sin embargo, aunque el ruxolitinib ha cambiado el escenario terapéutico de la MF, no hay indicios claros de un efecto modificador de la enfermedad. El alotrasplante de células madre sigue siendo la única terapia curativa de la MF, pero debido a su morbilidad y mortalidad asociadas, generalmente se restringe a pacientes elegibles con MF de riesgo alto e intermedio 2. Para mejorar los resultados terapéuticos actuales, actualmente se está probando la combinación de inhibidores de JAK con otros agentes y se están investigando fármacos más nuevos.

ALK-Negative Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: Current Concepts and Molecular Pathogenesis of a Heterogeneous Group of Large T-Cell Lymphomas.

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a subtype of CD30+ large T-cell lymphoma (TCL) that comprises ~2% of all adult non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Based on the presence/absence of the rearrangement and expression of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ALCL is divided into ALK+ and ALK-, and both differ clinically and prognostically. This review focuses on the historical points, clinical features, histopathology, differential diagnosis, and relevant cytogenetic and molecular alterations of ALK- ALCL and its subtypes: systemic, primary cutaneous (pc-ALCL), and breast implant-associated (BIA-ALCL). Recent studies have identified recurrent genetic alterations in this TCL. In systemic ALK- ALCL, rearrangements in DUSP22 and TP63 are detected in 30% and 8% of cases, respectively, while the remaining cases are negative for these rearrangements. A similar distribution of these rearrangements is seen in pc-ALCL, whereas none have been detected in BIA-ALCL. Additionally, systemic ALK- ALCL-apart from DUSP22-rearranged cases-harbors JAK1 and/or STAT3 mutations that result in the activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. The JAK1/3 and STAT3 mutations have also been identified in BIA-ALCL but not in pc-ALCL. Although the pathogenesis of these alterations is not fully understood, most of them have prognostic value and open the door to the use of potential targeted therapies for this subtype of TCL.

Breast Prosthesis Syndrome: Pathophysiology and Management Algorithm.

The cosmetic use of devices like prostheses to increase breast volume is nothing new. It is calculated that millions of people have been exposed to silicone in several ways, including breast implants, and since 1964 there has been uncertainty regarding their safety. We did not find in the literature any studies that reported the appearance of a specific immunological disease in patients with silicone breast implants. Furthermore, there are also neither case-control studies nor reports of patients proving that symptoms of autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) occurred after the placement of silicone implants nor that the patients had pre-existing symptoms. Several studies link silicone to allergic reactions and the development of systemic autoimmune diseases; however, other studies deny this association. There are currently several theories about the effect of silicone on the body. One theory with greater acceptance proposes an adjuvant effect of silicone on the development of autoimmune diseases in genetically predisposed patients. However, the variety of symptoms occurring in patients who develop these pathologies leads to doubts about the relationship between the adjuvant effects of a silicone prosthesis may have with a specific autoimmune disease or a mix of these diseases. The lack of consensus on this topic obliges a full review of what has already been reported in the literature to integrate the knowledge and propose a focus for new research on this matter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

What is the Evidence of Lymphoma in Patients with Prostheses Other Than Breast Implants?

INTRODUCTION: Medical devices such as hip, knee, breast, vascular prostheses, among others, are very useful in different pathologies. We cannot doubt that their use is a great tool, besides being an advance in medicine; they provide a change in the quality of life of many patients; however, they are not exempt from adverse reactions and events. METHODS: We conduct a systematic review about lymphoma in the presences of prostheses other than breast implants. RESULTS: We selected 21 publications with a total of 24 patients. The largest number of prostheses was related to long bones in a total of 13 prostheses. The most frequent symptoms were: pain (52%), inflammation (24%), visible or palpable mass 20%. The most frequent type of lymphoma was non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma in 14 cases. DISCUSSION: The presence of microparticles make biological degradation and wear of the implants, with macrophage and lymphocyte activation and the consequent production of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-1ß, interleukin-6, and prostaglandin 2 (PGE2). CONCLUSION: Lymphoma is not a common disease in patients with prostheses, and more data are needed to identify risk factors and make proper diagnoses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Characteristics and clinical significance of cytogenetic abnormalities in polycythemia vera.

Up to 20% of patients with polycythemia vera have karyotypic abnormalities at the time of the initial diagnosis. However, the cytogenetic abnormalities in polycythemia vera have not been well characterized and their prognostic impact is largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to address these issues using a large cohort of polycythemia vera patients with cytogenetic information available. The study included 422 patients, 271 in polycythemic phase, 112 with post-polycythemic myelofibrosis, 11 in accelerated phase, and 28 in blast phase. Abnormal karyotypes were detected in 139 (33%) patients, ranging from 20% in those in the polycythemic phase to 90% among patients in accelerated/blast phase. Different phases harbored different abnormalities: isolated del(20q), +8 and +9 were the most common abnormalities in the polycythemic phase; del(20q) and +1q were the most common abnormalities in post-polycythemic myelofibrosis; and complex karyotypes were the most common karyotypes in accelerated and blast phases. Patients with an abnormal karyotype showed a higher frequency of disease progression, a shorter transformation-free survival and an inferior overall survival compared with patients with a normal karyotype in the same disease phase. Cytogenetics could be effectively stratified into three risk groups, low- (normal karyotype, sole +8, +9 and other single abnormality), intermediate- (sole del20q, +1q and other two abnormalities), and high-risk (complex karyotype) groups. We conclude that cytogenetic changes in polycythemia vera vary in different phases of disease, and carry different prognostic impacts.