Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 56
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(7): e2419258, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38949812

RESUMEN

Importance: In the context of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants or lineages and new vaccines, it is key to accurately monitor COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (CVE) to inform vaccination campaigns. Objective: To estimate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines administered in autumn and winter 2022 to 2023 against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (with all circulating viruses and XBB lineage in particular) among people aged 60 years or older in Europe, and to compare different CVE approaches across the exposed and reference groups used. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study obtained data from VEBIS (Vaccine Effectiveness, Burden and Impact Studies), a multicenter study that collects COVID-19 and influenza data from 11 European sites: Croatia; France; Germany; Hungary; Ireland; Portugal; the Netherlands; Romania; Spain, national; Spain, Navarre region; and Sweden. Participants were primary care patients aged 60 years or older with acute respiratory infection symptoms who were recruited at the 11 sites after the start of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign from September 2022 to August 2023. Cases and controls were defined as patients with positive and negative, respectively, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test results. Exposures: The exposure was COVID-19 vaccination. The exposure group consisted of patients who received a COVID-19 vaccine during the autumn and winter 2022 to 2023 vaccination campaign and 14 days or more before symptom onset. Reference group included patients who were not vaccinated during or in the 6 months before the 2022 to 2023 campaign (seasonal CVE), those who were never vaccinated (absolute CVE), and those who were vaccinated with at least the primary series 6 months or more before the campaign (relative CVE). For relative CVE of second boosters, patients receiving their second booster during the campaign were compared with those receiving 1 booster 6 months or more before the campaign. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was RT-PCR-confirmed, medically attended, symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Four CVE estimates were generated: seasonal, absolute, relative, and relative of second boosters. CVE was estimated using logistic regression, adjusting for study site, symptom onset date, age, chronic condition, and sex. Results: A total of 9308 primary care patients were included, with 1687 cases (1035 females; median [IQR] age, 71 [65-79] years) and 7621 controls (4619 females [61%]; median [IQR] age, 71 [65-78] years). Within 14 to 89 days after vaccination, seasonal CVE was 29% (95% CI, 14%-42%), absolute CVE was 39% (95% CI, 6%-60%), relative CVE was 31% (95% CI, 15% to 44%), and relative CVE of second boosters was 34% (95% CI, 18%-47%) against all SARS-CoV-2 variants. In the same interval, seasonal CVE was 44% (95% CI, -10% to 75%), absolute CVE was 52% (95% CI, -23% to 82%), relative CVE was 47% (95% CI, -8% to 77%), and relative CVE of second boosters was 46% (95% CI, -13% to 77%) during a period of high XBB circulation. Estimates decreased with time since vaccination, with no protection from 180 days after vaccination. Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study among older Europeans, all CVE approaches suggested that COVID-19 vaccines administered in autumn and winter 2022 to 2023 offered at least 3 months of protection against symptomatic, medically attended, laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The effectiveness of new COVID-19 vaccines against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants should be continually monitored using CVE seasonal approaches.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Estaciones del Año , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Humanos , Anciano , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Pueblo Europeo
2.
Viruses ; 16(4)2024 03 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675876

RESUMEN

Although the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 circulated intensely during the 2021-2022 season, many patients with severe acute respiratory disease tested negative for COVID-19. The aim of this study was to assess the presence of different respiratory viruses in deceased persons. The proportion of deceased persons with respiratory viral infections in the 2021-2022 season in Navarre, Spain, was estimated considering all deaths caused by confirmed COVID-19 according to the epidemiological surveillance and the results of multiplex PCR tests for respiratory viruses performed in a sample of deceased persons with a cause of death other than COVID-19. Of 3578 deaths, 324 (9.1%) were initially reported as caused by pre-mortem confirmed COVID-19. A sample of 242 persons who died by causes other than COVID-19 were tested post-mortem; 64 (26.4%) of them were positive for any respiratory virus: 11.2% for SARS-CoV-2, 5.8% for rhinovirus, 3.7% for human coronavirus, 2.5% for metapneumovirus, 1.7% for respiratory syncytial virus, 1.7% for parainfluenza, 1.2% for influenza, and less than 1% each for adenovirus and bocavirus. Combining both approaches, we estimated that 34.4% of all deceased persons during the study period had a respiratory viral infection and 19.2% had SARS-CoV-2. Only 33.3% (9/27) of SARS-CoV-2 and 5.0% (2/40) of other viruses detected post-mortem had previously been confirmed pre-mortem. In a period with very intense circulation of SARS-CoV-2 during the pandemic, other respiratory viruses were also frequently present in deceased persons. Some SARS-CoV-2 infections and most other viral infections were not diagnosed pre-mortem. Several respiratory viruses may contribute to excess mortality in winter.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/virología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/mortalidad , España/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prevalencia , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Estaciones del Año , Adolescente , Pandemias
3.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(4)2024 Apr 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675765

RESUMEN

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is a frequent cause of hospitalisation in the first few months of life; however, this risk rapidly decreases with age. Nirsevimab immunoprophylaxis was approved in the European Union for the prevention of RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease in infants during their first RSV season. We evaluated the effectiveness of nirsevimab in preventing hospitalisations for confirmed RSV infection and the impact of a strategy of immunisation at birth. A population-based cohort study was performed in Navarre, Spain, where nirsevimab was offered at birth to all children born from October to December 2023. Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio of hospitalisation for PCR-confirmed RSV infection between infants who received and did not receive nirsevimab. Of 1177 infants studied, 1083 (92.0%) received nirsevimab. The risk of hospitalisation for RSV was 8.5% (8/94) among non-immunised infants versus 0.7% (8/1083) in those that were immunised. The estimated effectiveness of nirsevimab was 88.7% (95% confidence interval, 69.6-95.8). Immunisation at birth of infants born between October and December 2023 prevented one hospitalisation for every 15.3 immunised infants. Immunisation of children born from September to January might prevent 77.5% of preventable hospitalisations for RSV in infants born in 2023-2024. These results support the recommendation of nirsevimab immunisation at birth to children born during the RSV epidemic or in the months immediately before to prevent severe RSV infections and alleviate the overload of paediatric hospital resources.

4.
Euro Surveill ; 29(13)2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551095

RESUMEN

BackgroundScarce European data in early 2021 suggested lower vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineages than previous variants.AimWe aimed to estimate primary series (PS) and first booster VE against symptomatic BA.1/BA.2 infection and investigate potential biases.MethodsThis European test-negative multicentre study tested primary care patients with acute respiratory symptoms for SARS-CoV-2 in the BA.1/BA.2-dominant period. We estimated PS and booster VE among adults and adolescents (PS only) for all products combined and for Comirnaty alone, by time since vaccination, age and chronic condition. We investigated potential bias due to correlation between COVID-19 and influenza vaccination and explored effect modification and confounding by prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.ResultsAmong adults, PS VE was 37% (95% CI: 24-47%) overall and 60% (95% CI: 44-72%), 43% (95% CI: 26-55%) and 29% (95% CI: 13-43%) < 90, 90-179 and ≥ 180 days post vaccination, respectively. Booster VE was 42% (95% CI: 32-51%) overall and 56% (95% CI: 47-64%), 22% (95% CI: 2-38%) and 3% (95% CI: -78% to 48%), respectively. Primary series VE was similar among adolescents. Restricting analyses to Comirnaty had little impact. Vaccine effectiveness was higher among older adults. There was no signal of bias due to correlation between COVID-19 and influenza vaccination. Confounding by previous infection was low, but sample size precluded definite assessment of effect modification.ConclusionPrimary series and booster VE against symptomatic infection with BA.1/BA.2 ranged from 37% to 42%, with similar waning post vaccination. Comprehensive data on previous SARS-CoV-2 infection would help disentangle vaccine- and infection-induced immunity.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Adolescente , Anciano , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacuna BNT162 , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud
5.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(1)2024 Jan 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38250871

RESUMEN

In 2021-2022, most of the Spanish population received COVID-19 vaccines and a high proportion of them had SARS-CoV-2 infection. We estimated the rate of hospitalisations and deaths that were averted by risk reduction among vaccinated COVID-19 cases. Hospitalisations and deaths were analysed among COVID-19 cases confirmed in 2021 and 2022 in Navarre, Spain. To calculate the number of prevented outcomes by sex, age, comorbidities, and semester, the difference in the risk of each outcome between unvaccinated and vaccinated cases was multiplied by the number of vaccinated cases. COVID-19 vaccination coverage with any dose reached 88%, 86% with full vaccination, and 56% with a booster dose. The cumulative rates per 1000 inhabitants were 382 COVID-19 confirmed cases, 6.70 hospitalisations, and 1.15 deaths from COVID-19. The estimated rates of prevented events by vaccination were 16.33 hospitalisations and 3.39 deaths per 1000 inhabitants, which was 70.9% and 74.7% of expected events without vaccination, respectively. People aged 80 years and older or with major chronic conditions accounted for the majority of hospitalizations and deaths prevented by COVID-19 vaccination. One hospitalisation and death due to COVID-19 were averted for every 53 and 258 people vaccinated, respectively. The high COVID-19 vaccine effect in reducing the risk of severe outcomes and the high vaccination coverage in risk populations prevented three out of four hospitalisations and deaths due to COVID-19 during a period of intense circulation of SARS-CoV-2.

6.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(9)2023 Sep 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37766154

RESUMEN

We estimated influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) in preventing outpatient and hospitalized cases in the 2022-2023 season. A test-negative design included a representative sample of outpatients and all hospitalized patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) from October 2022 to May 2023 in Navarre, Spain. ILI patients were tested by PCR for influenza virus. Influenza vaccination status was compared between confirmed influenza cases and test-negative controls. Among 3321 ILI patients tested, IVE to prevent influenza cases was 34% (95% confidence interval (CI): 16 to 48) overall, 85% (95%CI: 63 to 94) against influenza B, and 28% (95%CI: 3 to 46) against A(H3N2). Among 558 outpatients, 222 (40%) were confirmed for influenza: 55% A(H3N2), 11% A(H1N1), and 31% B. Overall, IVE to prevent outpatient cases was 48% (95%CI: 8 to 70), 88% (95%CI: 3 to 98) against influenza B, and 50% (95%CI: -4 to 76) against A(H3N2). Of 2763 hospitalized patients, 349 (13%) were positive for influenza: 64% A(H3N2), 17% A(H1N1), and 8% B. IVE to prevent hospitalization was 24% (95%CI: -1 to 42) overall, 82% (95%CI: 49 to 93) against influenza B, and 16% (95%CI: -17 to 40) against A(H3N2). No IVE was observed in preventing influenza A(H1N1). IVE was high to prevent influenza B, moderate against A(H3N2) and null against A(H1N1). A lower proportion of influenza B cases may explain the smaller IVE in hospitalized patients than in outpatients. The null IVE against A(H1N1) was consistent with the observed antigenic drift and supports the new composition of the 2023-2024 influenza vaccine.

7.
An Sist Sanit Navar ; 46(2)2023 Aug 16.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37594061

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Between February 2020 and September 2022, SARS-CoV-2 has circulated uninterruptedly throughout Spain. This study analyses COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths in Navarre. METHODS: Enhanced epidemiological surveillance and results of seroepidemiological surveys were used to analyze COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths, based on the vaccination coverage and other preventive measures applied from February 2020 to September 2022. RESULTS: A total of 295,424 COVID-19 cases were confirmed (45% of the population in Navarre); 8,594 required hospital admission (1.3%), 832 were admitted to intensive care units (1.3‰) and 1,725 died (2.6‰). Over the first wave of the pandemic, there were 1,934 hospitalizations and 529 deaths from confirmed COVID-19 cases over a few weeks; these figures dropped rapidly following lockdown. Until October 2021, SARS-CoV-2 circulation was modulated by non-pharmacological preventive measures. The subsequent relaxation of these measures led to a wide circulation of the omicron variant, increasing the number of cases by three-fold. The high vaccination coverage against COVID-19 introduced decisive changes in the epidemiology of the disease, reducing to less than 2%, 0.1%, and 0.5% the cases requiring hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or that died, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Initial lockdown and non-pharmacological preventive measures helped control SARS-CoV-2 transmission until vaccination was extended. Vaccination achieved a decisive reduction of the COVID-19 severity and lethality.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , España/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Hospitalización
8.
An. sist. sanit. Navar ; 46(2): [e1044], May-Agos. 2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-224230

RESUMEN

Fundamento: El SARS-CoV-2 circuló ininterrumpidamente enEspaña durante el período comprendido entre febrero de 2020y septiembre de 2022. Este estudio analiza su repercusión en lasinfecciones, hospitalizaciones y defunciones en Navarra. Métodos: A partir de la vigilancia epidemiológica reforzada yde los resultados de encuestas sero-epidemiológicas, se hananalizado las infecciones, hospitalizaciones y defunciones porCOVID-19 en función de la cobertura vacunal y otras medidaspreventivas aplicadas durante el período del estudio.Resultados: Se confirmaron 295.424 personas con COVID-19(45% de la población navarra), 8.594 requirieron ingreso hospitalario (1,3%), 832 ingresaron en unidades de cuidados intensi-vos (1,3‰) y 1.725 fallecieron (2,6‰). Durante la primera ondapandémica, en pocas semanas se registraron 1.934 hospitalizaciones y 529 defunciones por COVID-19 confirmado; dicha cifrase redujo significativamente tras el confinamiento domiciliario. Hasta octubre de 2021, la circulación del SARS-CoV-2 estuvomodulada por las medidas preventivas no farmacológicas. Laposterior relajación de las mismas dio paso a una amplia circulación de la variante ómicron, triplicando el número de casosregistrados hasta entonces. La alta cobertura vacunal frente ala COVID-19 introdujo cambios decisivos en su epidemiología,reduciendo la proporción de casos que requirieron hospitalización, ingreso en unidades de cuidados intensivos y fallecimientos a menos del 2%, 0,1% y 0,5%, respectivamente. Conclusiones: El confinamiento domiciliario inicial y las medidas preventivas no farmacológicas contuvieron la circulación delSARS-CoV-2 hasta extenderse la vacunación, con la cual se logróuna reducción decisiva en la gravedad y letalidad de la COVID-19.(AU)


Background: Between February 2020 and September 2022,SARS-CoV-2 has circulated uninterruptedly throughout Spain.This study analyses COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, anddeaths in Navarre. Methods: Enhanced epidemiological surveillance and results ofseroepidemiological surveys were used to analyze COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths, based on the vaccinationcoverage and other preventive measures applied from February2020 to September 2022. Results: A total of 295,424 COVID-19 cases were confirmed (45%of the population in Navarre); 8,594 required hospital admission (1.3%), 832 were admitted to intensive care units (1.3‰)and 1,725 died (2.6‰). Over the first wave of the pandemic,there were 1,934 hospitalizations and 529 deaths from confirmed COVID-19 cases over a few weeks; these figures droppedrapidly following lockdown. Until October 2021, SARS-CoV-2circulation was modulated by non-pharmacological preventivemeasures. The subsequent relaxation of these measures led to awide circulation of the omicron variant, increasing the numberof cases by three-fold. The high vaccination coverage againstCOVID-19 introduced decisive changes in the epidemiology ofthe disease, reducing to less than 2%, 0.1%, and 0.5% the casesrequiring hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or thatdied, respectively. Conclusions: Initial lockdown and non-pharmacological preventive measures helped control SARS-CoV-2 transmission untilvaccination was extended. Vaccination achieved a decisive reduction of the COVID-19 severity and lethality.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Pandemias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Hospitalización , Coronavirus Relacionado al Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo , España/epidemiología , Salud Pública , Servicios de Vigilancia Epidemiológica , Vacunas , Vacunación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
9.
An. sist. sanit. Navar ; (Monografía n 8): 145-158, Jun 23, 2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-222470

RESUMEN

Fundamento: Desde septiembre de 2020, los centros escolares permanecieron abiertos bajomedidas de prevención de la infección por COVID-19 y una estrecha vigilancia y control porparte de Salud Pública. Métodos: Se describió la organización y el procedimiento de rastreo escolar durante la pande-mia de COVID-19 en Navarra. Se estudió el alumnado rastreado, cuarentenas escolares, trans-misión en el aula, e impacto en la actividad educativa. Resultados: El rastreo fue desarrollado por el Departamento de Salud en coordinación con elDepartamento de Educación. Durante el curso 2020/21, la incidencia en escolares fue similar oinferior a la población general y las ondas epidémicas no mostraron relación con los periodoslectivos. El 26% del alumnado, mayormente de educación infantil y primaria, estuvo en cuaren-tena. La tasa de ataque secundaria (TAS) en las aulas fue inferior al 5%. En el curso 2021/22, laincidencia aumentó con la entrada de la variante Ómicron. Se indicó cuarentena en el 17% delalumnado de infantil y primaria durante el primer trimestre, y en el 11% durante el segundo. LaTAS ascendió al 18% en el primer trimestre, y la transmisión alcanzó niveles muy altos en el se-gundo, con grandes brotes. Las cuarentenas tuvieron un gran impacto en la actividad lectiva. Conclusiones: La gestión de casos y contactos en el ámbito escolar resultó de suma importan-cia para mantener un balance equilibrado entre la seguridad y el control de la pandemia en lasaulas, y asegurar las garantías pedagógicas y el bienestar de la infancia.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Servicios de Salud Escolar , Instituciones Académicas , Trazado de Contacto , Cuarentena , Pandemias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , España , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Salud Pública , Sistemas de Salud , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Control de Infecciones
10.
An. sist. sanit. Navar ; (Monografía n 8): 235-248, Jun 23, 2023. graf, tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-222476

RESUMEN

Fundamento: La COVID-19 tuvo un impacto importante en la salud de la población. Desdeenero de 2021, una proporción creciente de la población ha recibido vacunas frente a laCOVID-19 (vacunación COVID) que han demostrado una alta efectividad para prevenir formasgraves de esta enfermedad. Este estudio ha evaluado el impacto de la vacunación COVID paraprevenir hospitalizaciones y defunciones en Navarra. Métodos: A partir de la vigilancia epidemiológica reforzada y de estimaciones de efectividadde las vacunas se calculó el número de infecciones, ingresos hospitalarios y en unidades decuidados intensivos (UCI) y defunciones que se han prevenido mediante la vacunación COVID entre enero de 2021 y septiembre de 2022. Resultados. Hasta septiembre de 2022, el 88% de la población había recibido alguna dosisde vacuna COVID. Se estima que la vacunación ha prevenido el 15% (n=45.320) de los casosconfirmados, el 75% (n=12.703) de los ingresos hospitalarios, el 66% (n=877) de los ingresosen UCI y el 82% (n=3.367) de las defunciones. Durante 2021 descendió progresivamente laproporción de ingresos y defunciones por COVID-19 observados respecto a las que hubieranpodido producirse sin vacunación. En ausencia de vacunación COVID, los ingresos y defuncionesen las ondas de la variante Ómicron habrían superado ampliamente las cifras registradas en2020. Se estima que se evitó un caso de COVID-19 confirmado por cada 13 personas vacunadas,una hospitalización por cada 45, un ingreso en UCI por cada 656 y una defunción por cada 171. Conclusiones: La vacunación COVID ha tenido un papel muy importante en la prevención dehospitalizaciones y defunciones en Navarra, cambiando totalmente la gravedad y letalidad deesta enfermedad.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Pandemias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Vacunas , Coronavirus Relacionado al Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo , Vacunación , España , Salud Pública , Mortalidad , Servicios de Salud
11.
An. sist. sanit. Navar ; (Monografía n 8): 667-681, Jun 23, 2023. tab, graf, ilus
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-222499

RESUMEN

Fundamento. El SARS-CoV-2 ha circulado ininterrumpidamente en España desde febrero de 2020 hasta septiembre de 2022. El presente estudio estima y describe su repercusión en infecciones, hospitalizaciones y defunciones. Métodos. A partir de la vigilancia epidemiológica reforzada, los resultados de encuestas seroepidemiológicas y los datos de mortalidad diaria, se han analizado las infecciones, hospitalizaciones y defunciones por COVID-19 entre febrero de 2020 y septiembre de 2022 en Navarra. Resultados. Se confirmaron 295.424 personas con COVID-19 (45% de la población), 8594 requirieron ingreso hospitalario (1,3% habitantes), 832 ingresaron en unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) (1,3 por 1000) y 1725 fallecieron (2,6 por 1000). La primera onda pandémica produjo 1934 hospitalizaciones y 529 defunciones por COVID-19 confirmado en pocas semanas, y su número descendió rápidamente tras el confinamiento domiciliario. Hasta octubre de 2021 la circulación del SARS-CoV-2 estuvo modulada por las medidas preventivas no farmacológicas. La extensión de la vacunación frente a la COVID-19 introdujo cambios decisivos en la epidemiología de la enfermedad, reduciendo a menos del 2% los casos que requerían hospitalización, del 0,1% los que ingresaban en UCI y del 0,5% la letalidad. Conclusiones. Coincidiendo con la generalización de la vacunación se produjo una reducción importante de la gravedad y letalidad de la COVID-19, que pasó de comportarse inicialmente como una pandemia, a acabar asemejándose a otras infecciones endémicas por virus respiratorios. El confinamiento domiciliario inicial, las medidas preventivas no farmacológicas y la vacunación de la COVID-19 han sido intervenciones eficaces y oportunas para reconducir el curso de la pandemia en diferentes momentos.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Pandemias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Hospitalización , Coronavirus Relacionado al Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo , Infecciones , España , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación , Prevención de Enfermedades
12.
J Infect Public Health ; 16(3): 410-417, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36724697

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccination was expected to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, but the relevance of this effect remains unclear. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination of the index cases and their close contacts in reducing the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. METHODS: Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection was evaluated in two cohorts of adult close contacts of COVID-19 confirmed cases (social and household settings) by COVID-19 vaccination status of the index case and the close contact, from April to November 2021 in Navarre, Spain. The effects of vaccination of the index case and the close contact were estimated as (1-adjusted relative risk) × 100%. RESULTS: Among 19,631 social contacts, 3257 (17%) were confirmed with SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 vaccination of the index case reduced infectiousness by 44% (95% CI, 27-57%), vaccination of the close contact reduced susceptibility by 69% (95% CI, 65-73%), and vaccination of both reduced transmissibility by 74% (95% CI, 70-78%) in social settings, suggesting some synergy of effects. Among 20,708 household contacts, 6269 (30%) were infected, and vaccine effectiveness estimates were 13% (95% CI, -5% to 28%), 61% (95% CI, 58-64%), and 52% (95% CI, 47-56%), respectively. These estimates were lower in older people and had not relevant differences between the Alpha (April-June) and Delta (July-November) variant periods. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination reduces infectiousness and susceptibility; however, these effects are insufficient for complete control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, especially in older people and household setting. Relaxation of preventive behaviors after vaccination may counteract part of the vaccine effect on transmission.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Vacunación
13.
Euro Surveill ; 28(5)2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36729113

RESUMEN

BackgroundAs COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection was lower for cases of the Omicron vs the Delta variant, understanding the effect of vaccination in reducing risk of hospitalisation and severe disease among COVID-19 cases is crucial.AimTo evaluate risk reduction of hospitalisation and severe disease in vaccinated COVID-19 cases during the Omicron BA.1-predominant period in Navarre, Spain.MethodsA case-to-case comparison included COVID-19 epidemiological surveillance data in adults ≥ 18 years from 3 January-20 March 2022. COVID-19 vaccination status was compared between hospitalised and non-hospitalised cases, and between severe (intensive care unit admission or death) and non-severe cases using logistic regression models.ResultsAmong 58,952 COVID-19 cases, 565 (1.0%) were hospitalised and 156 (0.3%) were severe. The risk of hospitalisation was reduced within the first 6 months after full COVID-19 vaccination (complete primary series) (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.06; 95% CI: 0.04-0.09) and after 6 months (aOR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.12-0.21; pcomparison < 0.001), as well as after a booster dose (aOR: 0.06: 95% CI: 0.04-0.07). Similarly, the risk of severe disease was reduced (aOR: 0.13, 0.18, and 0.06, respectively). Compared with cases fully vaccinated 6 months or more before a positive test, those who had received a booster dose had lower risk of hospitalisation (aOR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.28-0.52) and severe disease (aOR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.21-0.68).ConclusionsFull COVID-19 vaccination greatly reduced the risk of hospitalisation and severe outcomes in COVID-19 cases with the Omicron variant, and a booster dose improved this effect in people aged over 65 years.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , España/epidemiología , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Hospitalización
14.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 17(1): e13069, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36702797

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2021-2022, influenza A viruses dominated in Europe. The I-MOVE primary care network conducted a multicentre test-negative study to measure influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE). METHODS: Primary care practitioners collected information on patients presenting with acute respiratory infection. Cases were influenza A(H3N2) or A(H1N1)pdm09 RT-PCR positive, and controls were influenza virus negative. We calculated VE using logistic regression, adjusting for study site, age, sex, onset date, and presence of chronic conditions. RESULTS: Between week 40 2021 and week 20 2022, we included over 11 000 patients of whom 253 and 1595 were positive for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2), respectively. Overall VE against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was 75% (95% CI: 43-89) and 81% (95% CI: 45-93) among those aged 15-64 years. Overall VE against influenza A(H3N2) was 29% (95% CI: 12-42) and 25% (95% CI: -41 to 61), 33% (95% CI: 14-49), and 26% (95% CI: -22 to 55) among those aged 0-14, 15-64, and over 65 years, respectively. The A(H3N2) VE among the influenza vaccination target group was 20% (95% CI: -6 to 39). All 53 sequenced A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses belonged to clade 6B.1A.5a.1. Among 410 sequenced influenza A(H3N2) viruses, all but eight belonged to clade 3C.2a1b.2a.2. DISCUSSION: Despite antigenic mismatch between vaccine and circulating strains for influenza A(H3N2) and A(H1N1)pdm09, 2021-2022 VE estimates against circulating influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 were the highest within the I-MOVE network since the 2009 influenza pandemic. VE against A(H3N2) was lower than A(H1N1)pdm09, but at least one in five individuals vaccinated against influenza were protected against presentation to primary care with laboratory-confirmed influenza.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Atención Primaria de Salud , Vacunación , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Masculino , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano
15.
J Infect Dis ; 227(3): 332-338, 2023 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36179126

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We compare the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes among co-circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants between January 2021 and May 2022 in Navarra, Spain. METHODS: We compared the frequency of hospitalization and severe disease (intensive care unit admission or death) due to COVID-19 among the co-circulating variants. Variants analyzed were nonvariants of concern (non-VOCs), Alpha, Delta, Omicron BA.1, and Omicron BA.2. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratio (aOR). RESULTS: The Alpha variant had a higher risk of hospitalization (aOR, 1.86 [95 confidence interval {CI}, 1.282.71]) and severe disease (aOR, 2.40 [95 CI, 1.314.40]) than non-VOCs. The Delta variant did not show a significantly different risk of hospitalization (aOR, 0.73 [95 CI, .401.30]) and severe disease (aOR, 3.04 [95 CI, .5716.22]) compared to the Alpha variant. The Omicron BA.1 significantly reduced both risks relative to the Delta variant (aORs, 0.28 [95 CI, .16.47] and 0.23 [95 CI, .12.46], respectively). The Omicron BA.2 reduced the risk of hospitalization compared to BA.1 (aOR, 0.52 [95 CI, .29.95]). CONCLUSIONS: The Alpha and Delta variants showed an increased risk of hospitalization and severe disease, which decreased considerably with the Omicron BA.1 and BA.2. Surveillance of variants can lead to important differences in severity.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
16.
Euro Surveill ; 27(33)2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35983774

RESUMEN

In Navarre, Spain, in May 2022, the seroprevalence of anti-nucleocapsid (N) and anti-spike (S) antibodies of SARS-CoV-2 was 58.9% and 92.7%, respectively. The incidence of confirmed COVID-19 thereafter through July was lower in people with anti-N antibodies (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.13) but not with anti-S antibodies (aOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.47-2.38). Hybrid immunity, including anti-N antibodies induced by natural exposure to SARS-CoV-2, seems essential in preventing Omicron COVID-19 cases.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19 , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/inmunología , Humanos , Proteínas de la Nucleocápside , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , España/epidemiología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus
17.
Euro Surveill ; 27(26)2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35775428

RESUMEN

Compared with individuals unvaccinated in the current and three previous influenza seasons, in 2021/22, influenza vaccine effectiveness at primary care level was 37% (95% CI: 16 to 52) for current season vaccination, regardless of previous doses, and 35% (95% CI: -3 to 45) for only previous seasons vaccination. Against influenza A(H3N2), estimates were 39% (95% CI: 16 to 55) and 24% (95% CI: -8 to 47) suggesting moderate effectiveness of current season vaccination and possible remaining effect of prior vaccinations.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estaciones del Año , España/epidemiología , Vacunación
18.
Euro Surveill ; 27(21)2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35620997

RESUMEN

IntroductionIn July and August 2021, the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant dominated in Europe.AimUsing a multicentre test-negative study, we measured COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic infection.MethodsIndividuals with COVID-19 or acute respiratory symptoms at primary care/community level in 10 European countries were tested for SARS-CoV-2. We measured complete primary course overall VE by vaccine brand and by time since vaccination.ResultsOverall VE was 74% (95% CI: 69-79), 76% (95% CI: 71-80), 63% (95% CI: 48-75) and 63% (95% CI: 16-83) among those aged 30-44, 45-59, 60-74 and ≥ 75 years, respectively. VE among those aged 30-59 years was 78% (95% CI: 75-81), 66% (95% CI: 58-73), 91% (95% CI: 87-94) and 52% (95% CI: 40-61), for Comirnaty, Vaxzevria, Spikevax and COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen, respectively. VE among people 60 years and older was 67% (95% CI: 52-77), 65% (95% CI: 48-76) and 83% (95% CI: 64-92) for Comirnaty, Vaxzevria and Spikevax, respectively. Comirnaty VE among those aged 30-59 years was 87% (95% CI: 83-89) at 14-29 days and 65% (95% CI: 56-71%) at ≥ 90 days between vaccination and onset of symptoms.ConclusionsVE against symptomatic infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant varied among brands, ranging from 52% to 91%. While some waning of the vaccine effect may be present (sample size limited this analysis to only Comirnaty), protection was 65% at 90 days or more between vaccination and onset.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Atención Primaria de Salud , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación
19.
Microbiol Spectr ; 10(2): e0000822, 2022 04 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35412379

RESUMEN

The present study aimed to compare the susceptibility and infectivity between the Alpha and Delta variants of SARS-CoV-2 and to investigate characteristics of the index case and the contact that may affect transmission. The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was compared between close contacts of COVID-19 cases with Alpha and Delta variants during June 2021 to August 2021. In index cases, Spike gene target failure (TaqPath) was used as a proxy of Alpha variant and the L452R mutation (TaqMan) for Delta variant. Cox regression models were used to estimate adjusted relative risks (RR). We compared close contacts of index cases with Alpha (n = 2139) and Delta variants (n = 5439). Delta variant was more transmissible overall (relative risk [RR] 1.32, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.53), and in non-household contacts (RR 1.71, 95% CI = 1.35 to 2.16), but not in household contacts (RR 1.10, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.34; Pinteraction < 0.001). Delta variant excess transmission was observed when the index cases were 12 to 39 years old (RR 1.51, 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.79) and the close contacts were 18 to 39 years old (RR 1.62, 95% CI = 1.29 to 2.03), but not among those younger or older than such ages. Differences in transmissibility between variants disappeared with vaccination of the index case (RR 0.68, 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.02), but not with vaccination of the close contact. This report shows that the Delta variant is more transmissible than Alpha variant mainly among young adults. Vaccination of the index cases reduced the excess transmission, which reinforces the recommendation of vaccination to reduce transmission of the Delta variant. IMPORTANCE The higher transmissibility of the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with the Alpha variant has been reported. We compared the transmission of the Alpha and Delta variants by characteristics and COVID-19 vaccination status of index cases and their close contacts. Interestingly, the Delta variant showed increased transmissibility when the index case was an adolescent or young adult and when the close contact was a young adult; however, in index cases and close contacts of other age groups, transmission did not differ between variants. This may explain the increased proportion of young people who have been infected in the surges due to the Delta variant. The Delta variant was more transmissible than the Alpha variant when the index cases were unvaccinated against COVID-19, and their vaccination equaled the transmissibility of both variants, which suggests a higher impact of vaccination in controlling transmission of the Delta variant.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Niño , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Vacunación , Adulto Joven
20.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 4862, 2022 03 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35318406

RESUMEN

Evidence of influenza vaccine effectiveness in preventing confirmed influenza among persons diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is scarce. We assessed the average effect of influenza vaccination in the current and prior seasons in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza in COPD patients. We carried out a pooled test-negative case-control design in COPD patients hospitalized or presented to primary healthcare centres with influenza-like illness who were tested for influenza in 2015/2016 to 2019/2020 seasons in Navarre, Spain. Influenza vaccination status in the current and 5 prior seasons was compared between confirmed-influenza cases and test-negative controls. Vaccination effect was compared between target patients for vaccination with and without COPD. Out of 1761 COPD patients tested, 542 (31%) were confirmed for influenza and 1219 were test-negative controls. Average effect for current-season vaccination in preventing influenza was 40% (95% CI 20-54%), and for vaccination in prior seasons only was 24% (95% CI -10 to 47%). Point estimates seemed higher in preventing outpatient cases (60% and 58%, respectively) than inpatient cases (37% and 19%, respectively), but differences were no statistically significant. Influenza vaccination effect was similar in target population with and without COPD (p = 0.339). Influenza vaccination coverage in control patients with COPD was 68.3%. A 13.7% of the influenza cases in patients with COPD could be prevented by extending the influenza vaccine coverage. Average effect of current-season influenza vaccination was moderate to prevent influenza in COPD persons. The increase of influenza vaccination coverage can still prevent COPD exacerbations.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Pacientes Internos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/prevención & control , Estaciones del Año , Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...