Advances in sepsis biomarkers.

Sepsis, a dysregulated host immune response to an infectious agent, significantly increases morbidity and mortality for hospitalized patients worldwide. This chapter reviews (1) the basic principles of infectious diseases, pathophysiology and current definition of sepsis, (2) established sepsis biomarkers such lactate, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, (3) novel, newly regulatory-cleared/approved biomarkers, such as assays that evaluate white blood cell properties and immune response molecules, and (4) emerging biomarkers and biomarker panels to highlight future directions and opportunities in the diagnosis and management of sepsis.

Immune biomarkers associated with COVID-19 disease severity in an urban, hospitalized population.

Objectives: We sought to identify immune biomarkers associated with severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients admitted to a large urban hospital during the early phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Design: The study population consisted of SARS-CoV-2 positive subjects admitted for COVID-19 (n = 58) or controls (n = 14) at the Los Angeles County University of Southern California Medical Center between April 2020 through December 2020. Immunologic markers including chemokine/cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IP-10, MCP-1, TNF-α) and serologic markers against SARS-CoV-2 antigens (including spike subunits S1 and S2, receptor binding domain, and nucleocapsid) were assessed in serum collected on the day of admission using bead-based multiplex immunoassay panels. Results: We observed that body mass index (BMI) and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were significantly elevated in patients with the highest COVID-19 disease severity. IP-10 was significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients and was associated with increased SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Interactions among all available variables on COVID-19 disease severity were explored using a linear support vector machine model which supported the importance of BMI and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Conclusions: Our results confirm the known adverse association of BMI on COVID-19 severity and suggest that IP-10 and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could be useful to identify patients most likely to experience the most severe forms of the disease.

Cannabis positivity rates in 17 emergency departments across the United States with varying degrees of marijuana legalization.

BACKGROUND: Many states in the United States have progressed towards legalization of marijuana including decriminalization, medicinal and/or recreational use. We studied the impact of legalization on cannabis-related emergency department visits in states with varying degrees of legalization. METHODS: Seventeen healthcare institutions in fifteen states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Washington) participated. Cannabinoid immunoassay results and cannabis-related International Classification of Diseases (ninth and tenth versions) codes were obtained for emergency department visits over a 3- to 8-year period during various stages of legalization: no state laws, decriminalized, medical approval before dispensaries, medical dispensaries available, recreational approval before dispensaries and recreational dispensaries available. Trends and monthly rates of cannabinoid immunoassay and cannabis-related International Classification of Diseases code positivity were determined during these legalization periods. RESULTS: For most states, there was a significant increase in both cannabinoid immunoassay and International Classification of Diseases code positivity as legalization progressed; however, positivity rates differed. The availability of dispensaries may impact positivity in states with medical and/or recreational approval. In most states with no laws, there was a significant but smaller increase in cannabinoid immunoassay positivity rates. CONCLUSIONS: States may experience an increase in cannabis-related emergency department visits with progression toward marijuana legalization. The differences between states, including those in which no impact was seen, are likely multifactorial and include cultural norms, attitudes of local law enforcement, differing patient populations, legalization in surrounding states, availability of dispensaries, various ordering protocols in the emergency department, and the prevalence of non-regulated cannabis products.

AACC Guidance Document on the Clinical Use of Procalcitonin.

BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin (PCT), a peptide precursor of the hormone calcitonin, is a biomarker whose serum concentrations are elevated in response to systemic inflammation caused by bacterial infection and sepsis. Clinical adoption of PCT in the United States has only recently gained traction with an increasing number of Food and Drug Administration-approved assays and expanded indications for use. There is interest in the use of PCT as an outcomes predictor as well as an antibiotic stewardship tool. However, PCT has limitations in specificity, and conclusions surrounding its utility have been mixed. Further, there is a lack of consensus regarding appropriate timing of measurements and interpretation of results. There is also a lack of method harmonization for PCT assays, and questions remain regarding whether the same clinical decision points may be used across different methods. CONTENT: This guidance document aims to address key questions related to the use of PCT to manage adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with suspected sepsis and/or bacterial infections, particularly respiratory infections. The document explores the evidence for PCT utility for antimicrobial therapy decisions and outcomes prediction. Additionally, the document discusses analytical and preanalytical considerations for PCT analysis and confounding factors that may affect the interpretation of PCT results. SUMMARY: While PCT has been studied widely in various clinical settings, there is considerable variability in study designs and study populations. Evidence to support the use of PCT to guide antibiotic cessation is compelling in the critically ill and in some lower respiratory tract infections but is lacking in other clinical scenarios, and evidence is also limited in the pediatric and neonatal populations. Interpretation of PCT results requires guidance from multidisciplinary care teams of clinicians, pharmacists, and clinical laboratorians.

A Review of Regulations, Terminology, and Practical Approaches to Reportable Range Verification.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, federal regulations under CLIA '88 require reportable range verification of quantitative assays used for clinical purposes. Some accreditation agencies and other standards development organizations have their own additional requirements, recommendations, and/or terminologies relating to reportable range verification, leading to varying practices among clinical laboratories. CONTENT: Requirements and recommendations related to reportable range or analytical measurement range verification from different organizations are reviewed and compared. Optimal approaches to materials selection, data analysis, and troubleshooting are collated. SUMMARY: This review clarifies key concepts and outlines various practical approaches to reportable range verification.

Reported Awareness and Adoption of 2021 Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Equations Among US Clinical Laboratories, March 2022.

This study includes clinical laboratories that participated in the first general chemistry proficiency testing survey in 2022 to assess awareness and adoption of new equations from the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) that eliminated race-adjustment factors, including one based on creatinine and one based on creatinine and cystatin C.

Limited Evidence for Use of a Black Race Modifier in eGFR Calculations: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Commonly used estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations include a Black race modifier (BRM) that was incorporated during equation derivation. Race is a social construct, and a poorly characterized variable that is applied inconsistently in clinical settings. The BRM results in higher eGFR for any creatinine concentration, implying fundamental differences in creatinine production or excretion in Black individuals compared to other populations. Equations without inclusion of the BRM have the potential to detect kidney disease earlier in patients at the greatest risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD), but also has the potential to over-diagnose CKD or impact downstream clinical interventions. The purpose of this study was to use an evidence-based approach to systematically evaluate the literature relevant to the performance of the eGFR equations with and without the BRM and to examine the clinical impact of the use or removal. CONTENT: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies comparing measured GFR to eGFR in racially diverse adult populations using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease or the 2009-Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration-creatinine equations based on standardized creatinine measurements. Additionally, we searched for studies comparing clinical use of eGFR calculated with and without the BRM. Here, 8632 unique publications were identified; an additional 3 studies were added post hoc. In total, 96 studies were subjected to further analysis and 44 studies were used to make a final assessment. SUMMARY: There is limited published evidence to support the use of a BRM in eGFR equations.

Revisiting approaches to and considerations for urinalysis and urine culture reflexive testing.

Urinalysis is considered the world's oldest laboratory test. Today, many laboratories use macroscopic urinalysis as a screening tool to determine when to subject urine samples for a microscopic urinalysis and/or bacterial culture. While reflexive urine microscopy has been practiced for decades, and reflexive urine culture, more recently, evidence-based guidelines regarding optimal reflexive criteria and workflows are lacking. Standard approaches are hindered, in part, by a lack of harmonization of urinalysis and urine culture practices, heterogeneity in patient populations that are studied, and lack of provider adherence to recommended practices. This review summarizes studies that have evaluated the performance of reflexive urine microscopy and reflexive urine culture, particularly in the context of urinary tract infections. It also examines reported clinical outcomes from reflexive urinalysis interventions and their impact on antibiotic stewardship efforts. Finally, it discusses laboratory operational considerations for the implementation of reflexive algorithms.

Temporal Dynamics of Host Immune Response Associated With Disease Severity and Time to Recovery in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the temporal dynamics of two viral-induced inflammatory proteins interferon gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10) and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and examine their prognostic significance. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Multicenter, inpatient. PATIENTS: Adult patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 between March 2021 and October 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patient sera were collected on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 of hospitalization. Levels of IP-10, TRAIL, and CRP were measured using a point-of-need diagnostic immunoassay platform (MeMed BV, MeMed, Haifa, Israel) and compared between patients grouped by disease severity (severe vs nonsevere). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar regardless of severity except for a higher prevalence of diabetes and heart failure among severe patients. The immune profile at admission was similar between groups; IP-10 and CRP levels generally decreased while TRAIL levels increased over time in all patients. However, the severe group had higher IP-10 (median 713 vs 328 pg/mL; p = 0.045) and lower TRAIL levels (median 21 vs 30 pg/mL; p = 0.003) on day 3 compared with nonsevere patients. A breakpoint IP-10 level of greater than or equal to 570 pg/mL and TRAIL level of less than 25 pg/mL on day 3 were associated with COVID-19 severity. Patients with elevated day 3 IP-10 levels (≥ 570 pg/mL) were more likely to experience prolonged recovery time (median 12 vs 3 d; p < 0.001). The severe group had prolonged use of corticosteroids (12 vs 5 d; p < 0.001) and had a higher rate of secondary infections (20% vs 6%; p = 0.04) and in-hospital mortality (20% vs 0%; p < 0.001) as compared with nonsevere patients. CONCLUSIONS: The observed patterns in host immune response revealed a turning point in COVID-19 disease on hospital day 3 and the potential utility of IP-10 and TRAIL as sensitive markers associated with disease severity and time to recovery.

The effect of the Covid-19 shutdown on glycemic testing and control.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a halt to in-person ambulatory care. We evaluated how the reduction in access to care affected HbA1c testing and patient HbA1c levels. METHODS: HbA1c data from 11 institutions were extracted to compare testing volume and the percentage of abnormal results between a pre-pandemic period (January-June 2019, period 1) and a portion of the COVID-19 pandemic period (Jan-June 2020, period 2). HbA1c results greater than 6.4% were categorized as abnormal. RESULTS: HbA1C testing volumes decreased in March, April and May by 23, 61 and 40% relative to the corresponding months in 2019. The percentage of abnormal results increased in April, May and June (25, 23, 9%). On average, we found that the frequency of abnormal results increased by 0.31% for every 1% decrease in testing volume (p < 0.0005). CONCLUSION: HbA1c testing volume for outpatients decreased by up to 70% during the early months of the pandemic. The decrease in testing was associated with an increase in abnormal HbA1c results.

Side-Effects of COVID-19 on Patient Care: An INR Story.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have documented reduced access to patient care due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including access to diagnostic or screening tests, prescription medications, and treatment for an ongoing condition. In the context of clinical management for venous thromboembolism, this could result in suboptimal therapy with warfarin. We aimed to determine the impact of the pandemic on utilization of International Normalized Ratio (INR) testing and the percentage of high and low results. METHODS: INR data from 11 institutions were extracted to compare testing volume and the percentage of INR results ≥3.5 and ≤1.5 between a pre-pandemic period (January-June 2019, period 1) and a portion of the COVID-19 pandemic period (January-June 2020, period 2). The analysis was performed for inpatient and outpatient cohorts. RESULTS: Testing volumes showed relatively little change in January and February, followed by a significant decrease in March, April, and May, and then returned to baseline in June. Outpatient testing showed a larger percentage decrease in testing volume compared to inpatient testing. At 10 of the 11 study sites, we observed an increase in the percentage of abnormal high INR results as test volumes decreased, primarily among outpatients. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted INR testing among outpatients which may be attributable to several factors. Increased supratherapeutic INR results during the pandemic period when there was reduced laboratory utilization and access to care is concerning because of the risk of adverse bleeding events in this group of patients. This could be mitigated in the future by offering drive-through testing and/or widespread implementation of home INR monitoring.

Sky High or Undetectable? A Patient with Discordant Hemoglobin A1c.

A female patient aged 47 years presented with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 54.6%, as measured by ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and a glucose level of 106 mg/dL. The HbA1c was re-evaluated using a turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay and found below the level of detection. Hemoglobinopathy testing led to the identification of a hemoglobin variant consistent with Hb Raleigh, in which a valine → alanine substitution on the beta chain effects a charge difference, resulting in coelution with HbA1c on HPLC and a spuriously high reading. Many Hb variants may interfere with HbA1c measurement and generate misleading results. The unique properties of Hb Raleigh may give rise to analytical errors when evaluating HbA1c using 2 different methods-molecular charge-based (eg, HPLC) and molecular structure-based (eg, immunoassay)-yielding diametrically opposed results. Consequently, recognition and diagnosis of this entity are essential in patients with Hb Raleigh, especially when monitoring long-term glucose control.

Verification and Implementation of HIV Antibody Differentiation Testing to Improve Turnaround Time for the HIV Diagnostic Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Relying on reference laboratories for HIV confirmation testing may lead to delays in treatment and can cause stress for patients who have positive HIV screening results. OBJECTIVE: To internalize HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation testing within the hospital laboratory. METHODS: We analytically verified an HIV antibody differentiation immunoassay and subsequently compared result turnaround times (TATs) for HIV antibody differentiation and HIV-1 qualitative RNA in the months before and after the test internalization. RESULTS: HIV antibody differentiation was successfully verified. TATs for HIV antibody differentiation and HIV-1 RNA significantly improved, from medians of 40.4 hours and 156.5 hours to medians of 17.7 hours and 56.5 hours, respectively, after the internalization. The 90th-percentile turnaround times declined by 72% and 44%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible for a hospital laboratory to verify HIV antibody-differentiation testing. Its implementation may considerably improve result TATs for the HIV diagnostic algorithm.

Correlation of Chemical Urinalysis to Microscopic Urinalysis and Urine Culture: Implications for Reflex Urinalysis Workflows.

BACKGROUND: Urinalysis (UA) reflex testing approaches, which offer potential for savings in labor and result turnaround time, may rely on the performance of a chemical UA screen to determine which urine samples need microscopic UA and/or urine culture. We correlated chemical UA, microscopic UA, and urine culture results to determine the performance of chemical UA as a screening tool for reflex testing approaches. METHODS: Consecutive UA results for 9127 tests (simultaneous chemical UA and microscopic UA) were retrospectively reviewed and correlated. Urine culture results were also correlated for 3127 samples that had urine culture ordered within 24 h of UA. Positivity criteria for each UA method were predefined. RESULTS: Chemical UA yielded the following performance specifications for predicting microscopic findings: 93.0% sensitivity, 56.9% specificity, 64.7% positive predictive value, 90.5% negative predictive value. 3.2% of samples were negative by chemical UA but positive by microscopic UA. Of the samples with urine culture results available, 6.3% were negative by chemical UA but had clinically-significant positive urine cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Reflex testing of microscopic UA and/or urine culture dependent from chemical UA results provides a feasible opportunity to reduce unnecessary testing.