The Significance of Thyroid Hormone Receptors in Breast Cancer: A Hypothesis-Generating Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is frequently diagnosed among Canadian women. While targeted therapies are available for most BC patients; treatment resistance is common and novel therapeutic targets are of interest. Thyroid hormones (TH) bound to thyroid hormone receptors (THR) influence cell proliferation and differentiation; they are also involved in the growth and development of normal breast tissue. Evidence suggests that THRß is a tumor suppressor in various solid tumors. PURPOSE: This narrative review discusses retrospective studies regarding the clinical relevance of THRß as a potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in BC. METHODS: We consulted with an information specialist to develop a search strategy to find all literature related to THRα expression as a potential prognostic and therapeutic biomarker in breast cancer. The primary search was developed for Medline and translated to Embase. The searches were conducted on the Ovid platform on 18 August 2023. RESULTS: Across seven retrospective studies identified, several have shown an association between higher THRß1 expression with a lower risk of BC recurrence and with longer overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Some evidence suggests that THRß expression is associated with a lower risk of BC recurrence and death. Validation of THRß as an independent prognostic biomarker and possible predictive biomarker of response to endocrine therapy and/or chemotherapy is of interest. Given that THRß is upstream of the AKT/PI3K pathway, its potential as a predictive biomarker of response to AKT inhibitors and/or PI3K inhibitors may also be of value. Finally, the potential re-purposing of THRß agonists as anti-cancer agents warrants investigation.

Three-Year Outcomes Following Permissive Cardiotoxicity in Patients on Trastuzumab.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiotoxicity, manifest by reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), is the most common reason for the premature discontinuation of trastuzumab. While permissive cardiotoxicity (where mild cardiotoxicity is accepted to enable ongoing trastuzumab) has been shown feasible, the longer-term outcomes are unknown. We aimed to study the intermediate-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent permissive cardiotoxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients referred to the cardio-oncology service at McMaster University from 2016 to 2021 for LV dysfunction following trastuzumab administration. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent permissive cardiotoxicity. The median (25th-75th percentile) follow-up time from cardiotoxicity onset was 3 years (1.3-4 years). Forty-seven (92%) patients completed trastuzumab; 3 (6%) developed severe LV dysfunction or clinical heart failure (HF) while on trastuzumab and prematurely discontinued therapy. One discontinued trastuzumab by patient choice. At final follow-up after therapy completion, 7 (14%) patients still had mild cardiotoxicity, including 2 who had clinical heart failure and stopped trastuzumab early. Among those with recovered LV function, 50% had normalized LVEF or GLS by 6 and 3 months, respectively, after initial cardiotoxicity. There was no difference in characteristics between those who did or did not recover their LV function. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients exposed to permissive trastuzumab cardiotoxicity for HER2-positive breast cancer, 6% were unable to complete planned trastuzumab due to severe LV dysfunction or clinical HF. Although most patients recover their LV function after trastuzumab discontinuation or completion, 14% still have persistent cardiotoxicity by 3-year follow-up.

Use of Adjuvant Bisphosphonates and Other Bone-Modifying Agents in Breast Cancer: ASCO-OH (CCO) Guideline Update.

PURPOSE: To update recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario [CCO]) adjuvant bone-modifying agents in breast cancer guideline. METHODS: An Expert Panel conducted a systematic review to identify new, potentially practice-changing data. RESULTS: Four articles met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for revision of the previous recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS: Adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy should be discussed with all postmenopausal patients (natural or therapy-induced) with primary breast cancer, irrespective of hormone receptor status and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, who are candidates to receive adjuvant systemic therapy. Adjuvant bisphosphonates, if used, are not substitutes for standard anticancer modalities. The benefit of adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy will vary depending on the underlying risk of recurrence and is associated with a modest improvement in overall survival. The NHS PREDICT tool provides estimates of the benefit of adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy and may aid in decision making. Factors influencing the decision to recommend adjuvant bisphosphonate use should include patients' risk of recurrence, risk of side effects, financial toxicity, drug availability, patient preferences, comorbidities, and life expectancy. When an adjuvant bisphosphonate is used to prevent breast cancer recurrence, the therapeutic options recommended by the Panel include oral clodronate, oral ibandronate, and intravenous zoledronic acid. The Panel supports starting bisphosphonate therapy early, consistent with the points outlined in the parent CCO-ASCO guideline; this is a consensus recommendation. The Panel does not recommend adjuvant denosumab to prevent breast cancer recurrence, because studies did not show a consistent reduction of breast cancer recurrence in any subset of those with early-stage breast cancer.Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guideline.

Pertuzumab Cardiotoxicity in Patients With HER2-Positive Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpressing malignancies, including breast and gastro-esophageal, are associated with a poor prognosis. The cardiotoxicity of trastuzumab, a HER2-targeting monoclonal antibody, is well established. However, the cardiotoxic effect of pertuzumab, another HER2-directed therapy, is less well documented. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the risk of cardiac events in patients with HER2-positive cancer who are receiving pertuzumab. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of phase 2 and 3 randomized controlled trials in which the addition of pertuzumab to other standard therapies in patients with stage I-IV HER2-positive cancer was evaluated, and cardiac adverse effects reported. We searched MEDLINE (1946-2020), Embase (1974-2020), and CENTRAL. Two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias and extracted the data. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from the pooled data using the inverse variance method and random-effects models. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (8420 patients) were included: 1 was gastro-esophageal; 7 were breast cancer trials. Participants' median age ranged from 49 to 61.5 years. All participants received trastuzumab and chemotherapy in addition to pertuzumab or placebo. Compared with placebo, pertuzumab increased the risk of clinical heart failure (HF; RR [95% CI]: 1.97 [1.05-3.70]; I2 = 0%). However, pertuzumab had no demonstrable effect on asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (RR [95% CI]: 1.19 [0.89-1.61]; I2 = 19%). CONCLUSIONS: Pertuzumab increases the risk of clinical HF, but not asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction, in HER2-positive cancer patients. Further research into the mechanisms underlying pertuzumab-related HF is needed to understand its clinical spectrum of cardiotoxicity.

INTRODUCTION: Les tumeurs malignes qui surexpriment le récepteur 2 du facteur de croissance épidermique humain (HER2, de l'anglais Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), notamment le cancer du sein et le cancer de la jonction gastro-œsophagienne, sont associées à un mauvais pronostic. La cardiotoxicité du trastuzumab, un anticorps monoclonal qui vise le HER2, est bien établie. Toutefois, les effets cardiotoxiques du pertuzumab, un autre traitement qui vise le HER2, sont moins bien démontrés. L'objectif de cette revue systématique et de cette méta-analyse était de déterminer le risque d'événements cardiaques chez les patients atteints d'un cancer HER2 positif qui prennent du pertuzumab. MÉTHODES: Nous avons réalisé une revue systématique d'essais comparatifs à répartition aléatoire de phase 2 et de phase 3 lors desquels nous avons évalué l'ajout du pertuzumab à d'autres traitements standards chez les patients atteints d'un cancer HER2 positif de stades I-IV, et signalé les effets indésirables sur le cœur. Nous avons fait des recherches dans MEDLINE (1946-2020), Embase (1974-2020) et CENTRAL. Deux examinateurs indépendants ont évalué le risque de biais et extrait les données. Les données groupées ont permis de calculer les intervalles de confiance (IC) à 95 % des risques relatifs (RR) au moyen de la méthode de la variance inverse et des modèles à effets aléatoires. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons inclus huit essais contrôlés randomisés (8420 patients), soit un qui portait sur le cancer de la jonction gastro-œsophagienne, et sept sur le cancer du sein. L'âge médian des participants se situait entre 49 à 61,5 ans. Tous les participants ont pris le trastuzumab et ont suivi une chimiothérapie en plus de la prise du pertuzumab ou du placebo. Comparativement au placebo, le pertuzumab a fait augmenter le risque de manifestations cliniques de l'insuffisance cardiaque (IC) (RR [IC à 95 %] : 1,97 [1,05-3,70]; I2 = 0 %). Toutefois, le pertuzumab n'a démontré aucun effet sur la dysfonction systolique du ventricule gauche asymptomatique/minimalement symptomatique (RR [IC à 95 %] : 1,19 [0,89-1,61]; I2 = 19 %). CONCLUSIONS: Le pertuzumab fait augmenter le risque de manifestations cliniques de l'IC, mais pais la dysfonction systolique du ventricule gauche asymptomatique/minimalement symptomatique, chez les patients atteints d'un cancer HER2 positif. Des recherches plus approfondies sur les mécanismes sous-jacents à l'IC liée au pertuzumab sont nécessaires pour comprendre son spectre de manifestations cliniques de cardiotoxicité.

21-Gene Assay to Inform Chemotherapy Benefit in Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The recurrence score based on the 21-gene breast-cancer assay has been clinically useful in predicting a chemotherapy benefit in hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, axillary lymph-node-negative breast cancer. In women with positive lymph-node disease, the role of the recurrence score with respect to predicting a benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. METHODS: In a prospective trial, we randomly assigned women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, one to three positive axillary lymph nodes, and a recurrence score of 25 or lower (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a worse prognosis) to endocrine therapy only or to chemotherapy plus endocrine (chemoendocrine) therapy. The primary objective was to determine the effect of chemotherapy on invasive disease-free survival and whether the effect was influenced by the recurrence score. Secondary end points included distant relapse-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 5083 women (33.2% premenopausal and 66.8% postmenopausal) underwent randomization, and 5018 participated in the trial. At the prespecified third interim analysis, the chemotherapy benefit with respect to increasing invasive disease-free survival differed according to menopausal status (P = 0.008 for the comparison of chemotherapy benefit in premenopausal and postmenopausal participants), and separate prespecified analyses were conducted. Among postmenopausal women, invasive disease-free survival at 5 years was 91.9% in the endocrine-only group and 91.3% in the chemoendocrine group, with no chemotherapy benefit (hazard ratio for invasive disease recurrence, new primary cancer [breast cancer or another type], or death, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.26; P = 0.89). Among premenopausal women, invasive disease-free survival at 5 years was 89.0% with endocrine-only therapy and 93.9% with chemoendocrine therapy (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.83; P = 0.002), with a similar increase in distant relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87; P = 0.009). The relative chemotherapy benefit did not increase as the recurrence score increased. CONCLUSIONS: Among premenopausal women with one to three positive lymph nodes and a recurrence score of 25 or lower, those who received chemoendocrine therapy had longer invasive disease-free survival and distant relapse-free survival than those who received endocrine-only therapy, whereas postmenopausal women with similar characteristics did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; RxPONDER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01272037.).

Expanded human NK cells armed with CAR uncouple potent anti-tumor activity from off-tumor toxicity against solid tumors.

Despite the remarkable success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells against hematologic malignancies, severe off-tumor effects have constrained their use against solid tumors. Recently, CAR-engineered natural killer (NK) cells have emerged as an effective and safe alternative. Here, we demonstrate that HER2 CAR-expression in NK cells from healthy donors and patients with breast cancer potently enhances their anti-tumor functions against various HER2-expressing cancer cells, regardless of MHC class I expression. Moreover, HER2 CAR-NK cells exert higher cytotoxicity than donor-matched HER2 CAR-T cells against tumor targets. Importantly, unlike CAR-T cells, HER2 CAR-NK cells do not elicit enhanced cytotoxicity or inflammatory cytokine production against non-malignant human lung epithelial cells with basal HER2 expression. Further, HER2 CAR-NK cells maintain high cytotoxic function in the presence of immunosuppressive factors enriched in solid tumors. These results show that CAR-NK cells may be a highly potent and safe source of immunotherapy in the context of solid tumors.

Feasibility outcomes of a randomised, multicentre, pilot trial comparing standard 6-monthly dosing of adjuvant zoledronate with a single one-time dose in patients with early stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant zoledronate is widely used in patients with early stage breast cancer (EBC), but its optimal duration and dosing interval is still unknown. While a single-dose of zoledronate can improve bone density for many years, a proper evaluation of its effects on breast cancer-related outcomes would require a large trial. In this pilot study we evaluated the feasibility of performing such a trial. METHODS: Eligible patients with EBC were randomised to receive either one dose of zoledronate or 7 doses (6-monthly dosing for 3 years). Feasibility was assessed by a combination of primary outcomes including: activation of at least 6 Ontario sites within a year, active participation (i.e. approaching eligible patients for study participation) of at least half of the medical oncologists, and enrolment of at least 100 patients across all sites within 9 months of the sixth site being activated. RESULTS: All 6 sites were activated within 1 year and of 47 medical oncologists, 27 (57%) approached patients. Between November 2018 and April 2020, 211 eligible patients were randomised, 106 (50.2%) to a single dose of zoledronate and 105 (49.8%) to 6-monthly dosing. Baseline characteristics of randomised patients included; median age 59 (range 36-88), ER and/or PR positive (85%), Her2 positive (23%), menopausal status (premenopausal [19%], perimenopausal [6.7%] and postmenopausal [74%]) and 74% received neo/adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: All study feasibility endpoints were met in this trial comparing alternative schedules for adjuvant zoledronate. We will now seek funding for performing a larger efficacy trial.Trial registration: NCT03664687.

Adjuvant Trastuzumab Therapy: Can We Balance Efficacy and Safety?

Trastuzumab is an effective treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer. Current guidelines recommend withholding trastuzumab in patients experiencing a significant asymptomatic decline in left ventricular function. In this commentary, we discuss the survival benefits afforded by trastuzumab juxtaposed against the risk of trastuzumab-mediated cardiotoxicity. It is not known whether the net benefit of continuing trastuzumab in the setting of mild cardiotoxicity outweighs the associated risks. We describe a potential approach undertaken by our group, and others, and call for a randomized trial.

Attitudes and beliefs toward the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligometastatic breast cancer: A commentary on a survey of Canadian Medical Oncologists.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a highly ablative local therapy which has emerged as part of the treatment paradigm for patients with oligometastatic (OM) breast cancer (defined by 5 or fewer sites). This patient group has demonstrated improved prognosis in some cases and may therefore, benefit from aggressive local treatment. The role of upfront SBRT in newly diagnosed OM breast cancer in addition to systemic therapy is not clear, yet it is being increasingly utilized within the oncology community. The Canadian medical system is an ideal platform in which to investigate SBRT into the OM breast cancer setting, as it is not routinely implemented across centers at this time, as there is potential for robust collaboration between oncologists in the small community to investigate SBRT, and there is limited financial or industry motivation for early SBRT uptake compared with other countries. It is critical therefore to define the optimal patient population and scenarios for which SBRT should be investigated, as well as offered in the interim to Canadian patients. We therefore conducted a survey of Canadian Medical Oncologists, the primary physicians and gatekeepers of patients with OM breast cancer, to characterize their beliefs, opinions, and areas of controversy in the use of SBRT for OM breast cancer.

Breaking silence: a survey of barriers to goals of care discussions from the perspective of oncology practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is the leading cause of death in the developed world, and yet healthcare practitioners infrequently discuss goals of care (GoC) with hospitalized cancer patients. We sought to identify barriers to GoC discussions from the perspectives of staff oncologists, oncology residents, and oncology nurses. METHODS: This was a single center survey of staff oncologists, oncology residents, and inpatient oncology nurses. Barriers to GoC discussions were assessed on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = extremely unimportant; 7 = extremely important). RESULTS: Between July 2013 and May 2014, of 185 eligible oncology clinicians, 30 staff oncologists, 10 oncology residents, and 28 oncology nurses returned surveys (response rate of 37%). The most important barriers to GoC discussions were patient and family factors. They included family members' difficulty accepting poor prognoses (mean score 5.9, 95% CI [5.7, 6.2]), lack of family agreement in the goals of care (mean score 5.8, 95% CI [5.5, 6.1]), difficulty understanding the limitations of life-sustaining treatments (mean score 5.8, 95% CI [5.6, 6.1]), lack of patients' capacity to make goals of care decisions (mean score 5.7, 95% CI [5.5, 6.0]), and language barriers (mean score 5.7, 95% CI [5.4, 5.9]). Participants viewed system factors and healthcare provider factors as less important barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Oncology practitioners perceive patient and family factors as the most limiting barriers to GoC discussions. Our findings underscore the need for oncology clinicians to be equipped with strong communication skills to help patients and families navigate GoC discussions.

Safety of Continuing Trastuzumab Despite Mild Cardiotoxicity: A Phase I Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety of continuing trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive breast cancer who developed mild cardiotoxicity. BACKGROUND: Cardiotoxicity is the most common dose-limiting toxicity associated with trastuzumab. Current standard of care is discontinuation of trastuzumab, which can lead to worse cancer outcomes. It is unknown whether it is safe to continue trastuzumab despite mild cardiotoxicity. METHODS: Patients were eligible for this phase I, prospective, single-arm trial if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was between 40% and the lower limit of normal or if it fell ≥15% from baseline. Participants were treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and/or beta-blockers in a cardio-oncology clinic and were followed clinically and with serial echocardiograms for 1 year. The primary outcome was cardiac dose-limiting toxicity, defined as cardiovascular death, LVEF <40% together with any heart failure symptoms, or LVEF <35%. RESULTS: All 20 participants received ACE inhibitors and/or beta-blockers. A total of 18 participants (90%) received all planned trastuzumab doses. Two (10%) participants developed cardiac dose-limiting toxicity (heart failure with LVEF <40%). Their LVEF and heart failure symptoms improved to nearly normal following permanent trastuzumab discontinuation. There were no deaths. LVEF rose progressively from a mean of 49% at enrollment to 55% at 12 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: It may be feasible to continue trastuzumab despite mild cardiotoxicity in the setting of a cardio-oncology clinic, where ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers are administered. Approximately 10% of patients may develop moderate to severe heart failure using this approach. (Safety of Continuing Chemotherapy in Overt Left Ventricular Dysfunction Using Antibodies to Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 [SCHOLAR]; NCT02907021).

Statin therapy in the treatment of active cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical evidence suggests statins may have anti-tumor properties. Large observational studies are also consistent with improved survival and cancer-specific outcomes among cancer patients on statins. We sought to evaluate the randomized controlled trials of statins in addition to usual anti-cancer therapy. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Papers First and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed from inception through to July 4, 2017 to identify randomized clinical trials that investigated statin therapy in cancer patients. Our primary outcome was overall survival and our secondary outcome was progression-free survival. We calculated summary hazard ratio's (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on random-effects models using aggregate data. PROSPERO (CRD42017065503). RESULTS: Ten studies with 1,881 individuals were included with 1,572 deaths and a median follow-up of 23 months. All trials included patients with advanced (stage 3 or higher) disease. There was minimal between-study statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 1.8%, for OS; I2 = 0%, for PFS). The pooled HR for overall survival in patients randomized to statins plus standard anti-cancer therapy versus standard therapy alone was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.04). In the 9 studies that reported progression-free survival (1,798 participants), the pooled HR for statin plus standard therapy versus standard therapy alone was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.07). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced cancer and a prognosis <2 years, the addition of statins to standard anti-cancer therapy does not appear to improve overall survival or progression-free survival. Future research should assess if cancer patients with better prognosis benefit from longer-term statin therapy.

Soluble CD200 in secretory phase endometriosis endometrial venules may explain endometriosis pathophysiology and provide a novel treatment target.

Retrograde menstruation is common and in about 10% of women, endometrial tissues implant at ectopic sites and grow as endometriosis (EM) deposits. To date, there has been no marker to identify which patients have an endometrium that will generate deposits. Both endometrial regulatory T cells (Tregs) and increased stromal cell indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) have been implicated, and may suppress rejection by peritoneal NK cells, neutrophils, and cytotoxic macrophages. CD200 is a tolerance signaling molecule which promotes Tregs, IDO-producing macrophages, and can directly inhibit cytolytic natural killer (NK) cells and neutrophils. To determine if CD200 might be overexpressed in the endometrium of women with endometriosis, a pilot study using quantitative immunohistochemistry was done using uterine sections and EM deposits from hysterectomy patients. Both CD200 and CD200R proteins were detectable in endometriosis (EM) deposits and in endometrial epithelium and stroma. CD200 increased slightly in secretory phase whole endometrium of EM patients, but strikingly increased soluble CD200 (sCD200) absent sCD200R within venules typified both endometriosis deposits and secretory phase endometrial stromal venules and lymphatics in EM endometria compared to secretory phase NE endometria (P = 0.000006). In our opinion, accumulation of sCD200 in secretory phase endometrial blood vessels may explain development of ectopic deposits and quantifying sCD200 in menstrual blood may cases and identify predisposition to EM. Animal model studies are required to determine if antagonizing CD200 could be therapeutic.

Role of allied health care professionals in goals-of-care discussions with hospitalized patients and perceived barriers: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Allied health care professionals can contribute meaningfully to goals-of-care discussions with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families. We sought to explore the perspective of hospital-based allied health care professionals on their role in goals-of-care discussions and to identify barriers to their participation. METHODS: We surveyed allied health care professionals (social workers, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, registered dietitians, speech-language pathologists and pharmacists) on internal medicine, hematology-oncology, medical oncology and radiation oncology wards at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario, from April 2013 to May 2014. We modified a validated questionnaire originally designed to assess barriers to discussing goals of care from the perspective of nurses, residents and staff physicians on hospital medical wards. Respondents rated the questionnaire items on a 7-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of the 47 allied health care professionals invited, 32 (68%) participated: 9 physiotherapists, 7 social workers, 6 occupational therapists, 4 registered dietitians, 3 pharmacists and 2 speech-language pathologists; in 1 case, the profession was unknown. The greatest perceived barriers to engaging in goals-of-care discussions were lack of patient decision-making capacity (mean rating 5.9 [standard error (SE) 0.3]), lack of awareness of patients' previous discussions with other team members (mean rating 5.7 [SE 0.3]) and family members' difficulty accepting a poor prognosis (mean rating 5.6 [SE 0.2]). Although the respondents felt it was most acceptable for staff physicians, residents and advanced practice nurses to exchange information and reach a final decision during goals-of-care discussions, they felt it was acceptable for a broader range of allied health care professionals to initiate discussions (mean rating 4.7-5.8) and to act as decision coaches (clarifying values, weighing options) with patients and families (mean rating 5.3-6.1). INTERPRETATION: Allied health care professionals are willing to initiate goals-of-care discussions and to act as a decision coach with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families. By improving interprofessional collaboration, we can engage the entire health care team in this process.

Role of Bone-Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer: An American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario Focused Guideline Update.

Purpose To update, in collaboration with Cancer Care Ontario (CCO), key recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guideline on the role of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) in metastatic breast cancer. This focused update addressed the new data on intervals between dosing and the role of BMAs in control of bone pain. Methods A joint ASCO-CCO Update Committee conducted targeted systematic literature reviews to identify relevant studies. Results The Update Committee reviewed three phase III noninferiority trials of dosing intervals, one systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of de-escalation of BMAs, and two randomized trials of BMAs in control of pain secondary to bone metastases. Recommendations Patients with breast cancer who have evidence of bone metastases should be treated with BMAs. Options include denosumab, 120 mg subcutaneously, every 4 weeks; pamidronate, 90 mg intravenously, every 3 to 4 weeks; or zoledronic acid, 4 mg intravenously every 12 weeks or every 3 to 4 weeks. The analgesic effects of BMAs are modest, and they should not be used alone for bone pain. The Update Committee recommends that the current standard of care for supportive care and pain management-analgesia, adjunct therapies, radiotherapy, surgery, systemic anticancer therapy, and referral to supportive care and pain management-be applied. Evidence is insufficient to support the use of one BMA over another. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .