Cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a cross-sectional Spanish nationwide study of 405 cases.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous reactions after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To describe and classify cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. METHODS: A nationwide Spanish cross-sectional study was conducted. We included patients with cutaneous reactions within 21 days of any dose of the approved vaccines at the time of the study. After a face-to-face visit with a dermatologist, information on cutaneous reactions was collected via an online professional survey and clinical photographs were sent by email. Investigators searched for consensus on clinical patterns and classification. RESULTS: From 16 February to 15 May 2021, we collected 405 reactions after vaccination with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech; 40·2%), mRNA-1273 (Moderna; 36·3%) and AZD1222 (AstraZeneca; 23·5%) vaccines. Mean patient age was 50·7 years and 80·2% were female. Cutaneous reactions were classified as injection site ('COVID arm', 32·1%), urticaria (14·6%), morbilliform (8·9%), papulovesicular (6·4%), pityriasis rosea-like (4·9%) and purpuric (4%) reactions. Varicella zoster and herpes simplex virus reactivations accounted for 13·8% of reactions. The COVID arm was almost exclusive to women (95·4%). The most reported reactions in each vaccine group were COVID arm (mRNA-1273, Moderna, 61·9%), varicella zoster virus reactivation (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech, 17·2%) and urticaria (AZD1222, AstraZeneca, 21·1%). Most reactions to the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine were described in women (90·5%). Eighty reactions (21%) were classified as severe/very severe and 81% required treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are heterogeneous. Most are mild-to-moderate and self-limiting, although severe/very severe reactions are reported. Knowledge of these reactions during mass vaccination may help healthcare professionals and reassure patients.

Documento de consenso español para el algoritmo de tratamiento de la rosácea / Spanish Consensus Document on the Treatment Algorithm for Rosacea

Las últimas evidencias científicas y la incorporación de nuevos fármacos al arsenal terapéutico de la rosácea hacen necesario revisar y actualizar los criterios y estrategias de tratamiento. Con este fin, un grupo de 15 dermatólogos expertos en esta enfermedad aportaron y discutieron acerca de las diferentes terapias y los criterios de respuesta y cambio de tratamiento. Partiendo de la revisión crítica de la bibliografía y de la exposición de los hábitos de los dermatólogos españoles en su práctica clínica, se formularon distintas propuestas que fueron debatidas teniendo en consideración tanto la experiencia profesional como las preferencias de los pacientes o los criterios de equidad. Una vez validadas las propuestas, se formularon las recomendaciones finales que, junto con la evidencia aportada por las principales guías y estudios internacionales, dieron lugar al presente documento. El objetivo de este consenso es ofrecer al dermatólogo un enfoque práctico para abordar la rosácea

Recent scientific evidence and the incorporation of new drugs into the therapeutic arsenal against rosacea have made it necessary to review and update treatment criteria and strategies. To this end, a panel of 15 dermatologists, all experts in rosacea, was formed to share experiences and discuss treatment options, response criteria, and changes to treatment. Based on a critical review of the literature and a discussion of the routine practices of Spanish dermatologists, the panel proposed and debated different options, with consideration of the experience of professionals and the preferences of patients or equality criteria. Following validation of the proposals, the final recommendations were formulated and, together with the evidence from the main international guidelines and studies, used to produce this consensus document. The goal of this consensus document is to provide dermatologists with practical recommendations for the management of rosacea

Spanish Consensus Document on the Treatment Algorithm for Rosacea. / Documento de consenso español para el algoritmo de tratamiento de la rosácea.

Recent scientific evidence and the incorporation of new drugs into the therapeutic arsenal against rosacea have made it necessary to review and update treatment criteria and strategies. To this end, a panel of 15 dermatologists, all experts in rosacea, was formed to share experiences and discuss treatment options, response criteria, and changes to treatment. Based on a critical review of the literature and a discussion of the routine practices of Spanish dermatologists, the panel proposed and debated different options, with consideration of the experience of professionals and the preferences of patients or equality criteria. Following validation of the proposals, the final recommendations were formulated and, together with the evidence from the main international guidelines and studies, used to produce this consensus document. The goal of this consensus document is to provide dermatologists with practical recommendations for the management of rosacea.

Algoritmo de tratamiento con omalizumab en urticaria crónica espontánea / Algorithm for Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria with Omalizumab

Antecedentes y objetivo: Los ensayos pivotales de omalizumab en urticaria crónica espontánea (UCE) tienen un periodo de tratamiento de entre 12 y 24 semanas. Sin embargo, muchos pacientes en práctica clínica requieren periodos de tratamiento más prolongados. Por ello el objetivo es presentar un algoritmo de manejo del fármaco. Materiales y métodos: El documento de consenso que detallamos nace de la puesta en común, aceptación, revisión y confrontación de la literatura reciente del grupo de trabajo de UCE "Xarxa d'Urticària Catalana i Balear" (XUrCB). Resultados: Se inicia el tratamiento a dosis autorizada y se ajusta la dosis en intervalos trimestrales en función del Urticaria Activity Score de los últimos 7 días (UAS7) y/o el Urticarial Control Test (UCT). Conclusiones: El algoritmo propuesto pretende servir de guía respecto a cómo ajustar dosis, cómo y cuándo parar el fármaco y el modo de reintroducirlo en casos de recaída

Background and objective: Pivotal trials with omalizumab for treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) are generally run over 12 to 24weeks. However, in clinical practice, many patients need longer treatment. In this article, we present an algorithm for treatment with omalizumab. Material and methods: The consensus document we present is the result of a series of meetings by the CSU working group of "Xarxa d'Urticària Catalana i Balear" (XUrCB) at which data from the recent literature were presented, discussed, compared, and agreed upon. Results: Treatment with omalizumab should be initiated at the authorized dose, and is adjusted at 3-monthly intervals according to the Urticaria Activity Score Over 7 days, the Urticaria Control Test, or both. Conclusions: The algorithm proposed is designed to provide guidance on how to adjust omalizumab doses, how and when to discontinue the drug, and how to reintroduce it in cases of relapse

Algorithm for Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria with Omalizumab. / Algoritmo de tratamiento con omalizumab en urticaria crónica espontánea.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pivotal trials with omalizumab for treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) are generally run over 12 to 24weeks. However, in clinical practice, many patients need longer treatment. In this article, we present an algorithm for treatment with omalizumab. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The consensus document we present is the result of a series of meetings by the CSU working group of "Xarxa d'Urticària Catalana i Balear" (XUrCB) at which data from the recent literature were presented, discussed, compared, and agreed upon. RESULTS: Treatment with omalizumab should be initiated at the authorized dose, and is adjusted at 3-monthly intervals according to the Urticaria Activity Score Over 7days, the Urticaria Control Test, or both. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm proposed is designed to provide guidance on how to adjust omalizumab doses, how and when to discontinue the drug, and how to reintroduce it in cases of relapse.

Celulitis diseminada como presentación inicial de criptococosis sistémica en un paciente con artritis reumatoide / Systemic cryptococcosis presenting as extensive cellulitis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis

No disponible

No disponible

Efalizumab treatment of psoriasis vulgaris: a cohort study in outpatient clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Efalizumab is approved by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency for the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who fail to respond to, have a contraindication for, or cannot tolerate other systemic therapies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of efalizumab treatment in daily practice at a dermatology department in a teaching hospital in Barcelona, Spain. METHODS: A cohort study was carried out for patients treated with efalizumab for at least 3 months between May 2005 and July 2007. In total, 31 patients [21 men, 10 women; mean psoriasis and severity index (PASI) 12.9] were treated with efalizumab. Data were collected prospectively, including PASI, and recorded at the start of treatment and at follow-up visits with a frequency of at least every 3 months. RESULTS: At the end of the study period, efalizumab treatment was ongoing in 18 of the 31 patients (58.1%), and 7 of these patients had been treated for > or = 24 months. At week 12, 67.7% of the patients treated with efalizumab had achieved an improvement of 50% in PASI (PASI 50), 41.9% reached PASI 75, and 16.1% reached PASI 90 (intention to treat and as-treated analyses). In all, 19 patients (61.3%) received treatment for > or = 24 weeks. At week 24, 89.5% of these patients reached PASI 75, and 26.3% reached PASI 90 (as-treated analysis). During efalizumab treatment, mainly mild adverse effects were reported, including transient papular or circinate exacerbations of psoriasis, which were seen in five patients (16.1%). Rebounds (defined as PASI > or = 125% of baseline, leading to erythroderma in two patients) occurred in 7/31 patients (22.6%); this occurred while on treatment in 5/11 nonresponding patients (45.5%) and after discontinuation of treatment in 2/20 patients with good response (10.0%). CONCLUSION: Efalizumab is an effective and safe treatment for psoriasis in most patients of a high need population in routine practice, and provides maintained improvement in 'responders'. Combination treatment was transiently used in 48.4% of patients to optimize therapeutic results. Special consideration must be given to possible rebound in patients with an inadequate response or after discontinuation of treatment.

[Tacrolimus in diseases other than atopic dermatitis]. / Tacrolimus en enfermedades diferentes a la dermatitis atópica.

Topical tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant that acts through the inhibition of calcineurin and thus of the T cells. This causes a decrease in the production of interleukins, the granulocyte colony stimulating factor, alpha interferon and tumor necrosis factor. Although the use of topical tacrolimus is only indicated for the treatment of moderate or severe atopic dermatitis, its immunosuppressant effect and fewer side effects regarding topical corticosteroids have lead to the increase of its use in other types of inflammatory skin diseases. The purpose of this article is to review the use of tacrolimus in this group of diseases other than atopic dermatitis, this use not being authorized within the data sheet of the drug.

Tacrolimus en enfermedades diferentes a la dermatitis atópica / Tacrolimus in diseases other than atopic dermatitis

El tacrolimus tópico es un inmunosupresor que actúa mediante la inhibición de la calcineurina y, por tanto, de las células T, lo cual produce una disminución en la producción de interleucinas, del factor estimulador de colonias granulocíticas, del interferón alfa y del factor de necrosis tumoral. A pesar de que el uso del tacrolimus tópico sólo está indicado para el tratamiento de la dermatitis atópica moderada o severa, su efecto inmunosupresor y su menor número de efectos secundarios respecto a los corticoides tópicos, ha provocado el aumento de su utilización en otro tipo de enfermedades inflamatorias dermatológicas. La finalidad de este artículo es revisar el uso del tacrolimus en este grupo de enfermedades diferentes a la dermatitis atópica y cuyo uso no está autorizado en la ficha técnica del fármaco (AU)

Topical tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant that acts through the inhibition of calcineurin and thus of the T cells. This causes a decrease in the production of interleukins, the granulocyte colony stimulating factor, alpha interferon and tumor necrosis factor. Although the use of topical tacrolimus is only indicated for the treatment of moderate or severe atopic dermatitis, its immunosuppressant effect and fewer side effects regarding topical corticosteroids have lead to the increase of its use in other types of inflammatory skin diseases. The purpose of this article is to review the use of tacrolimus in this group of diseases other than atopic dermatitis, this use not being authorized within the data sheet of the drug (AU)

A case of vulvar pyoderma gangrenosum associated with collagenous colitis.

Pyoderma gangrenosum is a reactive inflammatory dermatosis which belongs to the spectrum of neutrophilic dermatoses. Due to a lack of diagnostic criteria, pyoderma gangrenosum is mainly a diagnosis of exclusion. It is rarely observed on the perineum, and vulvar involvement is even less frequent. Collagenous colitis is an idiopathic inflammatory colonic disease that is included in the microscopic colitides. The colonic mucosa and the crypt architecture are preserved but histologic alterations are found. We describe a case of collagenous colitis associated with vulvar pyoderma gangrenosum that improved spectacularly with cyclosporine 3 mg/kg/day and the twice-daily application of topical tacrolimus 0.1%.