Contribution of cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting for the treatment of HIV-1 infection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value contribution of cabotegravir + rilpivirine, the first injectable every two months long-acting antiretroviral  regimen, using multi-criteria decision analysis. METHOD: The study was developed in two phases. After a small pilot, a field  ork study with a larger number of multidisciplinary experts was carried out.  Seven single-tablet regimens, currently recommended by the GeSIDA  guidelines, were selected as comparators. EVIDEM methodology was followed,  with a framework composed by 12 quantitative and 5 contextual criteria. Mean  and standard deviations were calculated for quantitative criteria (1 to 5 scale;  comparative criteria -5 to +5), whereas qualitative criteria were analyzed as  percentages of experts that considered a positive, neutral or negative impact  for the National Health System. RESULTS: 35 experts participated in the study. Human immunodeficiency virus- 1 infection was considered severe (mean ± standard deviation: 3.0 ± 1.0),  with moderate size of affected population (2.7 ± 1.2) and unmet needs (2.8 ±  1.0). Minimal differences were found in comparative efficacy/effectiveness (0.1  ± 0.5), safety/tolerability (-0.5 ± 0.7), and cost criteria: cost of the  intervention (0.5 ± 2.0), other medical costs (0.2 ± 1.8) and non- medical/indirect costs (0.5 ± 1.6). Experts perceived an improvement with  cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting, compared  to current daily oral single-tablet regimens, in patient-reported outcomes (2.7 ± 1.4). Therapeutic benefit  of the long-acting regimen was considered moderate-to-high (3.5 ± 1.2).  Experts considered the evidence provided by cabotegravir + rilpivirine long- actingrobust (4.3 ± 0.8), with elevated consensus on its future  recommendation in guidelines (3.2 ± 1.0). In contextual criteria, most experts  considered positive the impact on population priorities and access (91%),  common goal and specific interests (63%) and political, historical, and cultural  context criteria (60%). Impact was neutral in system capacity and appropriate  use (40%), and opportunity costs and affordability criteria (51%). Result of the  weighted global value contribution of cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting  was 0.34 (-1 to +1 scale), with Patient Reported Outcomes comparative  criterion bringing the highest added value. CONCLUSIONS: Cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting provides added value  contribution to human immunodeficiency virus-1 management in Spain  compared to daily oral single-tablet regimens. Patient Reported Outcomes and  therapeutic benefit of cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting were highly valued  by experts, as the expected benefit in adherence and stigma-related issues  would improve overall quality of life for people living with human  immunodeficiency virus-1.

OBJETIVO: Determinar la contribución de valor de cabotegravir + rilpivirina, el  primer tratamiento antirretroviral inyectable de acción prolongada, utilizando  metodología de análisis de decisión multicriterio.Método: El estudio se desarrolló en dos fases: una prueba piloto y una fase de  extensión, con un grupo multidisciplinar más grande. Se seleccionaron siete regímenes de comprimido único orales diarios  recomendados en las guías GeSIDA como comparadores. Se utilizó el marco  EVIDEM, compuesto por 12 criterios cuantitativos y 5 contextuales. Los  criterios cuantitativos se analizaron calculando la media y desviación estándar,  y los cualitativos se analizaron mediante el porcentaje de expertos que  consideraron el impacto positivo, neutro o negativo para el Sistema Nacional de Salud. RESULTADOS: Un total de 35 expertos participaron en el estudio. La infección  por virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana 1 se consideró grave (media ±  desviación estándar: 3,0 ± 1,0), con un tamaño de población afectada (2,7 ±  1,2) y unas necesidades no cubiertas (2,8 ± 1,0) moderadas. Las diferencias  fueron mínimas en los criterios comparativos de eficacia/efectividad (0,1 ±  0,5), seguridad/tolerabilidad (­0,5 ± 0,7) y coste: coste del tratamiento (0,5 ±  2,0), otros costes médicos (0,2 ± 1,8) y costes no-médicos/indirectos (0,5  ± 1,6). Los expertos observaron una emtrimejora con cabotegravir + rilpivirina  de acción prolongada en los resultados reportados por los pacientes  (2,7 ± 1,4). El beneficio terapéutico (3,5 ± 1,2) se consideró moderado-alto.  La evidencia de cabotegravir + rilpivirina de acción prolongada fue considerada  robusta (4,3 ± 0,8), con elevado consenso sobre su futura  recomendación en las guías (3,2 ± 1,0). En los criterios contextuales, el  impacto fue positivo en los criterios de prioridades de acceso (91%), objetivo  común (63%) y contexto político (60%). El impacto fue neutro en la capacidad  del sistema (40%) y los costes de oportunidad (51%). El resultado  promedio de la contribución del valor global de cabotegravir + rilpivirina de  acción prolongada fue de 0,34 (escala de ­1 a +1), siendo el criterio de  resultados reportados por el paciente el que proporcionó la mayor contribución de valor (0,04). CONCLUSIONES: Cabotegravir + rilpivirina de acción prolongada aporta un valor  añadido en el manejo del virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana 1 en  España en comparación con los regímenes de comprimido único utilizados  actualmente. Los expertos valoraron positivamente los resultados reportados  por los pacientes y el beneficio terapéutico de cabotegravir + rilpivirina de  acción prolongada, considerando que el beneficio esperado en la adherencia y  los problemas relacionados con el estigma produciría una mejora en la calidad  de vida de las personas con virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana 1.

Contribución de cabotegravir + rilpivirina de acción prolongada al tratamiento de la infección por VIH-1 / Contribution of cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting for the treatment of HIV-1 infection

Objetivo: Determinar la contribución de valor de cabotegravir + rilpivirina, el primer tratamiento antirretroviral inyectable de acción prolongada,utilizando metodología de análisis de decisión multicriterio.Método: El estudio se desarrolló en dos fases: una prueba piloto y unafase de extensión, con un grupo multidisciplinar más grande. Se seleccionaron siete regímenes de comprimido único orales diarios recomendadosen las guías GeSIDA como comparadores. Se utilizó el marco EVIDEM,compuesto por 12 criterios cuantitativos y 5 contextuales. Los criterioscuantitativos se analizaron calculando la media y desviación estándar, ylos cualitativos se analizaron mediante el porcentaje de expertos que consideraron el impacto positivo, neutro o negativo para el Sistema Nacionalde Salud.Resultados: Un total de 35 expertos participaron en el estudio. Lainfección por virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana 1 se consideró grave(media ± desviación estándar: 3,0 ± 1,0), con un tamaño de poblaciónafectada (2,7 ± 1,2) y unas necesidades no cubiertas (2,8 ± 1,0) moderadas. Las diferencias fueron mínimas en los criterios comparativos deeficacia/efectividad (0,1 ± 0,5), seguridad/tolerabilidad (–0,5 ± 0,7) ycoste: coste del tratamiento (0,5 ± 2,0), otros costes médicos (0,2 ± 1,8)y costes no-médicos/indirectos (0,5 ± 1,6). Los expertos observaron una mejora con cabotegravir + rilpivirina de acción prolongada en los resultados reportados por los pacientes (2,7 ± 1,4). El beneficio terapéutico(3,5 ± 1,2) se consideró moderado-alto. La evidencia de cabotegravir+ rilpivirina de acción prolongada fue considerada robusta (4,3 ± 0,8),con elevado consenso sobre su futura recomendación en las guías(3,2 ± 1,0). En los criterios contextuales, el impacto fue positivo en loscriterios de prioridades de acceso (91%), objetivo común (63%) y contextopolítico (60%). (AU)

Objective: To determine the value contribution of cabotegravir + rilpivirine, the first injectable every two months long-acting antiretroviral regimen, using multi-criteria decision analysis.Method: The study was developed in two phases. After a small pilot,a field work study with a larger number of multidisciplinary experts wascarried out. Seven single-tablet regimens, currently recommended by theGeSIDA guidelines, were selected as comparators. EVIDEM methodology was followed, with a framework composed by 12 quantitative and5 contextual criteria. Mean and standard deviations were calculated forquantitative criteria (1 to 5 scale; comparative criteria –5 to +5), whereasqualitative criteria were analyzed as percentages of experts that considered a positive, neutral or negative impact for the National Health System.Results: 35 experts participated in the study. Human immunodeficiencyvirus-1 infection was considered severe (mean ± standard deviation:3.0 ± 1.0), with moderate size of affected population (2.7 ± 1.2) andunmet needs (2.8 ± 1.0). Minimal differences were found in comparative efficacy/effectiveness (0.1 ± 0.5), safety/tolerability (–0.5 ± 0.7),and cost criteria: cost of the intervention (0.5 ± 2.0), other medical costs(0.2 ± 1.8) and non-medical/indirect costs (0.5 ± 1.6). Experts perceived an improvement with cabotegravir + rilpivirine long-acting, compared to current daily oral single-tablet regimens, in patient-reported outcomes(2.7 ± 1.4). Therapeutic benefit of the long-acting regimen was considered moderate-to-high (3.5 ± 1.2). (AU)

Prolonged administration of maraviroc reactivates latent HIV in vivo but it does not prevent antiretroviral-free viral rebound.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains incurable due to latent viral reservoirs established in non-activated CD4 T cells that cannot be eliminated via antiretroviral therapy. Current efforts to cure HIV are focused on identifying drugs that will induce viral gene expression in latently infected cells, commonly known as latency reversing agents (LRAs). Some drugs have been shown to reactivate latent HIV but do not cause a reduction in reservoir size. Therefore, finding new LRAs or new combinations or increasing the round of stimulations is needed to cure HIV. However, the effects of these drugs on viral rebound after prolonged treatment have not been evaluated. In a previous clinical trial, antiretroviral therapy intensification with maraviroc for 48 weeks caused an increase in residual viremia and episomal two LTR-DNA circles suggesting that maraviroc could reactivate latent HIV. We amended the initial clinical trial to explore additional virologic parameters in stored samples and to evaluate the time to viral rebound during analytical treatment interruption in three patients. Maraviroc induced an increase in cell-associated HIV RNA during the administration of the drug. However, there was a rapid rebound of viremia after antiretroviral therapy discontinuation. HIV-specific T cell response was slightly enhanced. These results show that maraviroc can reactivate latent HIV in vivo but further studies are required to efficiently reduce the reservoir size.

Economic and epidemiologic impact of guidelines for early ART initiation irrespective of CD4 count in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Emerging data suggest that early antiretroviral therapy (ART) could reduce serious AIDS and non-AIDS events and deaths but could also increase costs. In January 2016, the Spanish guidelines were updated to recommend ART at any CD4 count. However, the epidemiologic and economic impacts of early ART initiation in Spain remain unclear. METHODS: The Johns Hopkins HIV Economic-Epidemiologic Mathematical Model (JHEEM) was utilized to estimate costs, transmissions, and outcomes in Spain over 20 years. We compared implementation of guidelines for early ART initiation to a counterfactual scenario deferring ART until CD4-counts fall below 350 cells/mm3. We additionally studied the impact of early ART initiation in combination with improvements to HIV screening, care linkage and engagement. RESULTS: Early ART initiation (irrespective of CD4-count) is expected to avert 20,100 [95% Uncertainty Range (UR) 11,100-83,000] new HIV cases over the next two decades compared to delayed ART (28% reduction), at an incremental health system cost of €1.05 billion [€0.66 - €1.63] billion, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €29,700 [€13,700 - €41,200] per QALY gained. Projected ICERs declined further over longer time horizon; e.g., an ICER of €12,691 over 30 years. Furthermore, the impact of early ART initiation was potentiated by improved HIV screening among high-risk individuals, averting an estimated 41,600 [23,200-172,200] HIV infections (a 58% decline) compared to delayed ART. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for ART initiation irrespective of CD4-counts are cost-effective and could avert > 30% of new cases in Spain. Improving HIV diagnosis can amplify this impact.

Deep-Sequencing Analysis of the Dynamics of HIV-1 Quasiespecies in Naive Patients during a Short Exposure to Maraviroc.

In this study, we have characterized quasispecies dynamics and the evolution of viral tropism in naive HIV-1-infected patients treated with a short course of maraviroc monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT01060618) independently of the tropism of the infecting virus. We randomly selected 20 patients infected with viruses displaying different basal tropisms-10 carrying R5 and 10 carrying dual/mixed X4 (DM/X4) viruses-at recruitment as determined by phenotypic assay (Trofile). Evolution of viral quasiespecies at the end of treatment was determined by ultradeep sequencing of the V3 region using a 454 Life Sciences Platform and geno2pheno (g2p) algorithm for viral tropism prediction. The false-positive rate (FPR) that defines the probability of classifying an R5 virus falsely as X4 was set at 10%. X4-specific HIV-1 viral load (VL) was calculated from sequences with an FPR of <3.75%. Virological response as defined as >1-log10 copies/ml reduction in VL was detected in 70% of patients independently of the basal tropism of the infecting virus. Viral tropism remained stable, and nonsignificant differences in FPR values before and after treatment were found for the majority of patients in both tropism groups. Only three patients (one with R5 and two with DM/X4 viruses) showed an increased (>1 log) X4 VL, and one patient harboring a DM/X4-tropic virus displayed a significant reduction in FPR values at the end of treatment. Fast changes in the composition of viral populations were observed in all patients after 10 days of maraviroc (MVC) monotherapy treatment, and a complete replacement of viral quasiespecies was found in 3/10 patients carrying R5-using viruses and 4/10 patients carrying DM/X4-using viruses.IMPORTANCE Initiation of treatment with maraviroc requires previous determination of viral tropism by genotypic or phenotypic methods because of the risk of treatment failure and selection of DM/X4-tropic variants. In this study, we confirm previous work showing that the virologic response to maraviroc is independent of basal tropism. By deep-sequencing analysis, we determined that fast changes in viral populations were due to the emergence of minority variants in some patients whereas in others generation of new strains was detected. The risk of DM/X4 selection was very low as FPR values remained stable, and only one patient showed a detrimental switch to DM/X4 variants. Our data show that some DM/X4 viruses are sensitive to maraviroc treatment probably because only a low proportion of DM/X4 viruses use preferentially the X4 receptor and contain authentically maraviroc-resistant viruses that are not accurately detected by current assays.

Impacto económico asociado a la implementación de las recomendaciones con grado de evidencia A-I del documento de consenso de GeSIDA/PNS (2015) relativas a la optimización del tratamiento antirretroviral en adultos infectados por virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana con carga viral suprimida en España / Economic impact of optimising antiretroviral treatment in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults with suppressed viral load in Spain, by implementing the grade A-1 evidence recommendations of the 2015 GESIDA/National AIDS Plan

Introducción: El objetivo de este estudio es estimar el impacto económico en España de la optimización del tratamiento antirretroviral (TAR) triple en pacientes con carga viral suprimida según las recomendaciones GeSIDA/PNS (2015) y su aplicabilidad en la práctica clínica. Métodos: A partir de los datos de prescripción del TAR de la encuesta hospitalaria 2014, siguiendo las recomendaciones de GeSIDA/PNS de optimización de TAR con grado de evidencia A-I, se desarrolló un modelo farmacoeconómico. Las pautas de optimización, la voluntad de optimización y demás asunciones y resultados del modelo fueron validados por un panel de expertos en la infección por VIH (infectológos y farmacéuticos hospitalarios). El análisis se realizó desde la perspectiva del SNS, considerando el coste farmacológico anual, precio de venta del laboratorio notificado, deducción RD-Ley-8/2010 e IVA. Resultados: El panel seleccionó 6 estrategias de optimización y estimó que en España de los 80.859 pacientes actualmente en TAR triple, 10.863 (13,4%) serían candidatos a optimizar su TAR según estas estrategias, generando ahorros de 15,9M euros /año (2,4% del coste farmacológico del TAR triple). Las estrategias más factibles (>40% del total de pacientes candidatos a optimizar, n=4.556) y asociadas a mayores reducciones del gasto (ahorro entre 653 y 4.797 euros /paciente-año según el TAR triple de partida) serían las optimizaciones a ATV/r+3TC. Conclusión: La aplicación a la práctica clínica española de las principales estrategias de optimización recomendadas en el documento GeSIDA/PNS (2015) generaría ahorros sustanciales, especialmente aquellas basadas en biterapia con ATV+3TC, contribuyendo así al control del gasto farmacéutico y a la sostenibilidad del SNS (AU)

Introduction: The objective of this study is to estimate the economic impact associated with the optimisation of triple antiretroviral treatment (ART) in patients with undetectable viral load according to the recommendations from the GeSIDA/PNS (2015) Consensus and their applicability in the Spanish clinical practice. Methods: A pharmacoeconomic model was developed based on data from a National Hospital Prescription Survey on ART (2014) and the A-I evidence recommendations for the optimisation of ART from the GeSIDA/PNS (2015) consensus. The optimisation model took into account the willingness to optimise a particular regimen and other assumptions, and the results were validated by an expert panel in HIV infection (Infectious Disease Specialists and Hospital Pharmacists). The analysis was conducted from the NHS perspective, considering the annual wholesale price and accounting for deductions stated in the RD-Law 8/2010 and the VAT. Results: The expert panel selected six optimisation strategies, and estimated that 10,863 (13.4%) of the 80,859 patients in Spain currently on triple ART, would be candidates to optimise their ART, leading to savings of 15.9M euros /year (2.4% of total triple ART drug cost). The most feasible strategies (>40% of patients candidates for optimisation, n=4,556) would be optimisations to ATV/r+3TC therapy. These would produce savings between 653 euros and 4,797 euros per patient per year depending on baseline triple ART. Conclusion: Implementation of the main optimisation strategies recommended in the GeSIDA/PNS (2015) Consensus into Spanish clinical practice would lead to considerable savings, especially those based in dual therapy with ATV/r+3TC, thus contributing to the control of pharmaceutical expenditure and NHS sustainability (AU)

Maraviroc Is Associated with Latent HIV-1 Reactivation through NF-κB Activation in Resting CD4+ T Cells from HIV-Infected Individuals on Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy.

Maraviroc is a CCR5 antagonist used in the treatment of HIV-1 infection. We and others have suggested that maraviroc could reactivate latent HIV-1. To test the latency-reversing potential of maraviroc and the mechanisms involved, we performed a phase II, single-center, open-label study in which maraviroc was administered for 10 days to 20 HIV-1-infected individuals on suppressive antiretroviral therapy (EudraCT registration no. 2012-003215-66). All patients completed full maraviroc dosing and follow-up. The primary endpoint was to study whether maraviroc may reactivate HIV-1 latency, eliciting signaling pathways involved in the viral reactivation. An increase in HIV-1 transcription in resting CD4+ T cells, estimated by levels of HIV-1 unspliced RNA, was observed. Moreover, activation of the NF-κB transcription factor was observed in these cells. To elucidate the mechanism of NF-κB activation by maraviroc, we have evaluated in HeLa P4 C5 cells, which stably express CCR5, whether maraviroc could be acting as a partial CCR5 agonist, with no other mechanisms or pathways involved. Our results show that maraviroc can induce NF-κB activity and that NF-κB targets gene expression by CCR5 binding, since the use of TAK779, a CCR5 inhibitor, blocked NF-κB activation and functionality. Taking the results together, we show that maraviroc may have a role in the activation of latent virus transcription through the activation of NF-κB as a result of binding CCR5. Our results strongly support a novel use of maraviroc as a potential latency reversal agent in HIV-1-infected patients.IMPORTANCE HIV-1 persistence in a small pool of long-lived latently infected resting CD4+ T cells is a major barrier to viral eradication in HIV-1-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. A potential strategy to cure HIV-1-infection is the use of latency-reversing agents to eliminate the reservoirs established in resting CD4+ T cells. As no drug has been shown to be completely effective so far, the search for new drugs and combinations remains a priority for HIV cure. We examined the ability of maraviroc, a CCR5 antagonist used as an antiretroviral drug, to activate latent HIV-1 in infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy. The study showed that maraviroc can activate NF-κB and, subsequently, induce latent HIV-1-transcription in resting CD4+ T cells from HIV-1-infected individuals on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Additional interventions will be needed to eliminate latent HIV-1 infection. Our results suggest that maraviroc may be a new latency-reversing agent to interfere with HIV-1 persistence during antiretroviral therapy.

Economic impact of optimising antiretroviral treatment in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults with suppressed viral load in Spain, by implementing the grade A-1 evidence recommendations of the 2015 GESIDA/National AIDS Plan. / Impacto económico asociado a la implementación de las recomendaciones con grado de evidencia A-I del documento de consenso de GeSIDA/PNS (2015) relativas a la optimización del tratamiento antirretroviral en adultos infectados por virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana con carga viral suprimida en España.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to estimate the economic impact associated with the optimisation of triple antiretroviral treatment (ART) in patients with undetectable viral load according to the recommendations from the GeSIDA/PNS (2015) Consensus and their applicability in the Spanish clinical practice. METHODS: A pharmacoeconomic model was developed based on data from a National Hospital Prescription Survey on ART (2014) and the A-I evidence recommendations for the optimisation of ART from the GeSIDA/PNS (2015) consensus. The optimisation model took into account the willingness to optimise a particular regimen and other assumptions, and the results were validated by an expert panel in HIV infection (Infectious Disease Specialists and Hospital Pharmacists). The analysis was conducted from the NHS perspective, considering the annual wholesale price and accounting for deductions stated in the RD-Law 8/2010 and the VAT. RESULTS: The expert panel selected six optimisation strategies, and estimated that 10,863 (13.4%) of the 80,859 patients in Spain currently on triple ART, would be candidates to optimise their ART, leading to savings of €15.9M/year (2.4% of total triple ART drug cost). The most feasible strategies (>40% of patients candidates for optimisation, n=4,556) would be optimisations to ATV/r+3TC therapy. These would produce savings between €653 and €4,797 per patient per year depending on baseline triple ART. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the main optimisation strategies recommended in the GeSIDA/PNS (2015) Consensus into Spanish clinical practice would lead to considerable savings, especially those based in dual therapy with ATV/r+3TC, thus contributing to the control of pharmaceutical expenditure and NHS sustainability.

Screening for precancerous anal lesions with P16/Ki67 immunostaining in HIV-infected MSM.

BACKGROUND: Screening of anal cancer in HIV-infected MSM with anal cytology results in high rates of false positive results and elevated burden of high-resolution anoscopies. High-risk HPV up-regulates p16 and Ki67 expression in epithelial cells. We assessed the usefulness of P16/Ki-67 immunostaining cytology for the diagnosis of precancerous anal lesions. METHODOLOGY: Cross-sectional multicenter study. Concomitant anal liquid cytology with p16/Ki-67 immunostaining and HRA with biopsy of acetowhite lugol-negative lesions was performed in HIV-infected MSM. We compared the diagnostic performance of an abnormal anal cytology and p16/Ki-67 immunostaining relative to HRA-guided biopsy by logistic regression and comparison of ROC areas. RESULTS: We included 328 HIV-infected MSM. HSIL was histologically diagnosed in 72 subjects (25.1%), and 2 (0.6%) were diagnosed with anal cancer. An abnormal cytology showed a sensitivity of 95.6% and a specificity of 58.8% for the diagnosis of biopsy-proven HSIL. P16/Ki67 positivity was associated with the presence of biopsy-proven HSIL (P trend = 0.004) but with low sensitivity (41.2%) and specificity (71%). The combination of standard cytology with P16/Ki67 immunostaining did not increment the predictive value of standard cytology alone (AUC 0.685 vs. 0.673, respectively, P = 0.688). CONCLUSION: In HIV-infected MSM P16/Ki67 immunostaining does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of anal cytology, which shows a high sensitivity yet poor specificity. Other approaches aimed at improving the diagnostic accuracy of current techniques for the diagnostic of precancerous HSIL are warranted.

Incidence and clearance of anal high-risk human papillomavirus in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: estimates and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: To estimate incidence and clearance of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV), and their risk factors, in men who have sex with men (MSM) recently infected by HIV in Spain; 2007-2013. METHODS: Multicenter cohort. HR-HPV infection was determined and genotyped with linear array. Two-state Markov models and Poisson regression were used. RESULTS: We analysed 1570 HR-HPV measurements of 612 MSM over 13 608 person-months (p-m) of follow-up. Median (mean) number of measurements was 2 (2.6), median time interval between measurements was 1.1 years (interquartile range: 0.89-1.4). Incidence ranged from 9.0 [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.8-11.8] per 1000 p-m for HPV59 to 15.9 (11.7-21.8) per 1000 p-m for HPV51. HPV16 and HPV18 had slightly above average incidence: 11.9/1000 p-m and 12.8/1000 p-m. HPV16 showed the lowest clearance for both 'prevalent positive' (15.7/1000 p-m; 95% CI 12.0-20.5) and 'incident positive' infections (22.1/1000 p-m; 95% CI 11.8-41.1). More sexual partners increased HR-HPV incidence, although it was not statistically significant. Age had a strong effect on clearance (P-value < 0.001) due to the elevated rate in MSM under age 25; the effect of HIV-RNA viral load was more gradual, with clearance rate decreasing at higher HIV-RNA viral load (P-value 0.008). CONCLUSION: No large variation in incidence by HR-HPV type was seen. The most common incident types were HPV51, HPV52, HPV31, HPV18 and HPV16. No major variation in clearance by type was observed, with the exception of HPV16 which had the highest persistence and potentially, the strongest oncogenic capacity. Those aged below 25 or with low HIV-RNA- viral load had the highest clearance.

Impact of low-level viremia on clinical and virological outcomes in treated HIV-1-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: The goal of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is to reduce HIV-related morbidity and mortality by suppressing HIV replication. The prognostic value of persistent low-level viremia (LLV), particularly for clinical outcomes, is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Assess the association of different levels of LLV with virological failure, AIDS event, and death among HIV-infected patients receiving combination ART. METHODS: We analyzed data from 18 cohorts in Europe and North America, contributing to the ART Cohort Collaboration. Eligible patients achieved viral load below 50  copies/ml within 3-9 months after ART initiation. LLV50-199 was defined as two consecutive viral loads between 50 and 199  copies/ml and LLV200-499 as two consecutive viral loads between 50 and 499  copies/ml, with at least one between 200 and 499  copies/ml. We used Cox models to estimate the association of LLV with virological failure (two consecutive viral loads at least 500  copies/ml or one viral load at least 500 copies/ml, followed by a modification of ART) and AIDS event/death. RESULTS: Among 17 902 patients, 624 (3.5%) experienced LLV50-199 and 482 (2.7%) LLV200-499. Median follow-up was 2.3 and 3.1 years for virological and clinical outcomes, respectively. There were 1903 virological failure, 532 AIDS events and 480 deaths. LLV200-499 was strongly associated with virological failure [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.05-5.17]. LLV50-199 was weakly associated with virological failure (aHR 1.38, 95% CI 0.96-2.00). LLV50-199 and LLV200-499 were not associated with AIDS event/death (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 0.81-1.68; and aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.62-1.48, [corrected] respectively). CONCLUSION: LLV200-499 was strongly associated with virological failure, but not with AIDS event/death. Our results support the US guidelines, which define virological failure as a confirmed viral load above 200  copies/ml.

Virological response to short-course maraviroc monotherapy does not predict viral tropism in HIV-1-infected treatment-naive patients.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate whether virological response to a short course of maraviroc monotherapy could predict HIV-1 tropism. METHODS: A clinical trial was performed in HIV-1 treatment-naive patients infected with R5- or non-R5-tropic virus determined using the Trofile(®) assay, with >1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL. Maraviroc was administered for 10 days. Viral load was measured at baseline and days 4, 7, 10 and 28. The main outcome measurement was the decline in HIV-1 RNA at day 10. The trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT01060618; TROPISMVC). RESULTS: Forty patients [30 R5 and 10 dual/mixed (D/M)] were recruited. There was a significant decrease in HIV-1 RNA after 10 days of maraviroc treatment in patients with R5-tropic virus (median 1.52 log10 RNA copies/mL; 95% CI 1.23-1.63; P < 0.0001), but also in patients with D/M-tropic virus (median 1.62 log(10) RNA copies/mL; 95% CI 0.33-1.88; P = 0.00024). The difference in the HIV-1 RNA decrease (-0.16 log(10) RNA copies/mL; 95% CI -0.53 to 0.22) was not significant (P = 0.410). A decrease >0.5 log(10) RNA copies/mL was found in 96.3% of patients with R5-tropic virus and in 70% of patients with D/M-tropic virus (P = 0.052). The differences were not significant when a decline of 1 log(10) RNA copies/mL was considered (92.6% versus 70%; P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-naive patients infected with R5- or D/M-tropic virus have similar virological responses to a short course of maraviroc monotherapy. This clinical test thus cannot be used as a surrogate marker of viral tropism in this population.

Raltegravir pharmacokinetics in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with advanced liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh C).

OBJECTIVES: To describe raltegravir pharmacokinetics at steady-state in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients under antiretroviral (ARV) treatment with (n = 5) and without (n = 5) advanced liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh C). METHODS: This was a non-randomized, Phase I, parallel-assignment, open-label pharmacokinetic study in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with Child-Pugh grade C hepatic cirrhosis. We recruited clinically stable HIV/HCV-coinfected adult patients with controlled HIV viraemia (<50 copies/mL) for at least 6 months. Raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) was added under fasting conditions for 5 days to the successful ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based ARV regimen. The trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT01289951) (LIVERAL). RESULTS: Raltegravir AUC0-12 and C12 were increased 1.72-fold (90% CI, 1.02 to 2.92) and 6.58-fold (90% CI, 2.92 to14.85), respectively, in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis. No safety issues were identified and raltegravir was well tolerated by all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Raltegravir plasma levels are increased in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with advanced liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh C). Despite the higher exposure, raltegravir was safe and well tolerated.

Correlation between different methods to measure microbial translocation and its association with immune activation in long-term suppressed HIV-1-infected individuals.

INTRODUCTION: Microbial translocation (MT) has been proposed as one of the triggering mechanisms of persistent immune activation associated to HIV-1 infection. Our objectives were to determine the correlation between different measurements of MT in suppressed HIV-1-infected individuals and to evaluate its correlation with immune activation. METHODS: Eighteen suppressed HIV-1-infected patients with CD4+ T-cell count above 350 cells per cubic millimeter and undetectable plasma viral load, included in antiretroviral treatment intensification clinical trials, were evaluated. Samples obtained at baseline and at established time points during the trials were analyzed. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP), soluble CD14 (sCD14), and bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA (16S rDNA), and markers of immune activation were determined. RESULTS: We analyzed 126 plasma samples from the 18 patients. LPS significantly correlated with sCD14 (P < 0.001, r = 0.407) and LBP (P = 0.042, r = 0.260). Also, a significant correlation was found between sCD14 and LBP (P = 0.009, r = 0.325) but not between bacterial 16S rDNA and LPS, sCD14, or LBP (P = 0.346, P = 0.405, and P = 0.644). On the other hand, no significant correlation was found between LPS, sCD14, or LBP and CD4 (P = 0.418, P = 0.619, and P = 0.728) or CD8 T-cell activation (P = 0.352, P = 0.275, and P = 0.124). Bacterial 16S rDNA correlated with activated CD4 T cells (P = 0.005, r = 0.104) but not with activated CD8 T cells (P = 0.171). CONCLUSIONS: There is a good correlation in the quantification of LPS, sCD14, and LBP levels, but not with bacterial 16S rDNA, as measurements of MT. We are unable to ensure that MT directly triggers T-cell immune activation at least among these patients with relatively good immune recovery and under treatment intensification.

Anal human papillomavirus genotype distribution in HIV-infected men who have sex with men by geographical origin, age, and cytological status in a Spanish cohort.

Knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) type distribution in populations at risk for anal cancer is needed. Here, we describe the anal HPV genotype distribution in a large Spanish cohort (Cohort of the Spanish HIV Research Network HPV [CoRIS-HPV]) of HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) according to geographical origin, age, and cytological status. A cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from 1,439 HIV-infected MSM (2007 to 2012) was performed. Anal HPV genotyping was performed using the Linear Array HPV genotyping test. Descriptive analyses of subject characteristics, prevalences, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed. The global prevalences of HPV, high-risk HPV (HR-HPV), and low-risk HPV (LR-HPV) types were 95.8%, 83.0%, and 72.7%, respectively. Among the HR-HPV types, HPV16 was the most common, followed by HPV59, -39, -51, -18, and -52. The prevalence of multiple HR-HPV infections was 58.5%. There were no differences in the crude analyses between Spanish and Latin-American MSM for most HPV types, and a peak in prevalence for most HPV types was seen in patients in their late thirties. Globally and by specific HPV groups, men with abnormal anal cytologies had a higher prevalence of infection than those with normal cytologies. This study has the largest number of HIV-positive MSM with HPV genotype data analyzed according to cytological status as far as we know. The information gained from this study can help with the design of anal cancer prevention strategies in HIV-positive patients.

Anal squamous intraepithelial lesions are frequent among young HIV-infected men who have sex with men followed up at the Spanish AIDS Research Network Cohort (CoRIS-HPV).

The aim of our study was to determine the baseline prevalence of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and associated risk factors in HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) in a Spanish ongoing multicenter cohort. CoRIS-HPV started in 2007, nested in the Spanish AIDS Research Network Cohort (CoRIS). Anal liquid cytology testing was performed. High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection was determined, and positive samples were genotyped. We analyzed all subjects up to April 2011. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. A total of 551 subjects with baseline anal liquid cytologies were analyzed; 37.0% negative for intraepithelial lesion, 9.0% atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance (ASCUS), 41.0% low-grade SIL, 4.0% high-grade SIL and 9.0% inadequate. Prevalence of anal SIL (excluding ASCUS) in valid samples (n = 450) was 54.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 49.9-59.3). Globally HR-HPV prevalence was 81.7% (95% CI = 78.0-85.2). Multiple infections (≥2 HR-HPV genotypes) were documented in 77.7% (95% CI = 73.1-82.0). The only risk factor associated with anal SIL was the number of HR-HPV types; MSM with five or more HR-HPV genotypes had an odds ratio (OR) of anal SIL seven times greater (OR = 7.4; 95% CI = 2.8-19.6) than those with one HR-HPV genotype. No associations were found for age, educational level, smoking, geographical origin, CD4 T-cell count, antiretroviral treatment or number of sexual partners. The prevalence of anal SIL in young HIV-positive MSM is high, and the main risk factor is multiple infections with HR-HPV types.

Prevalence of primary resistance mutations to integrase inhibitors in treatment-naïve and -experienced patients infected with B and non-B HIV-1 variants.

BACKGROUND: Raltegravir (RAL) constitutes the first available integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) available in clinical practice. Three independent pathways have been described to confer resistance to RAL. Secondary mutations with little effect on INSTI susceptibility and additional substitutions with an uncertain role have also been described especially in HIV-1 non-B variants. METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of primary, secondary, and additional resistance mutations to INSTIs in patients naïve to RAL or elvitegravir (EGV) carrying different HIV-1 variants. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients infected by B HIV-1 subtype (64%) or non-B HIV-1 variants (36%) were evaluated. No primary mutations to RAL or EGV were found in the inte-grase sequences analyzed. Secondary mutations were detected in only 5 patients. Additional mutations were found in both in B and non-B variants. According to the geno2pheno algorithm, some of the secondary mutations detected (L74V, E138K, G163RS, and V151I) have been associated with a reduced estimated susceptibility to RAL and only the E138K mutation has been associated with a decreased estimated susceptibility to EGV. No virological failure was observed after RAL was administrated in 17 patients carrying 1 or more additional substitutions in the absence of primary or secondary mutations. CONCLUSIONS: No primary resistance mutations to INSTI were found in treatment-naïve or -experienced patients infected with B or non-B HIV-1 variants. The vast majority had some polymorphic and non-polymorphic substitutions; however response to RAL was excellent in patients who harbored one or more of these mutations. We could not identify any clinical factors associated with the presence of any of these mutations.

What drives the number of high-risk human papillomavirus types in the anal canal in HIV-positive men who have sex with men?

We estimated the effect of sexual behavior, age, and immunodeficiency on the number of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) types in the anal canal among human immunodeficiency virus-positive men who have sex with men (MSM). Anal samples were genotyped with the Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test, and risk factors were investigated with Poisson regression. Of 586 MSM, 69% were Spanish, and 25.6% were Latin American; the median age was 34.9 years (interquartile range [IQR], 30.1-40.8). The median number of recent sex partners was 6 (IQR, 2-24 sex partners), and the median CD4(+) T-cell count was 531.5 cells/mm(3) (IQR, 403-701 cells/mm(3)). The prevalence of any and multiple HR-HPV infections was 83.4% and 60.5%, respectively. The most common types were HPV-16 (42%), HPV-51 (24%), HPV-39 (23.7%), and HPV-59 (23.5%). Age had a statistically significant, nonlinear association with the number of types, with the highest number detected around 35 years of age (P < .001). The number of recent sex partners had a statistically significant, fairly linear association on the log scale (P = .033). The high prevalence of HR-HPV types is associated with recent sexual behavior and age.

Persistence of novel first-line antiretroviral regimes in a cohort of HIV-positive subjects, CoRIS 2008-2010.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the persistence of the most commonly used first-line combined antiretroviral regimens (cART) in HIV-infected adults in the CoRIS cohort. METHODS: CoRIS is an open prospective multicentre cohort of HIV-infected adults naive to cART at entry. Patients enrolled between January 2008 and June 2010 were included. The main outcome was treatment persistence, defined as time from cART initiation to first treatment change (TC). Cox models taking into account competing risks to estimate sub-hazard ratios (sHR) were performed. RESULTS: Of 1,512 patients, 919 (60.8%) initiated cART with the backbone tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus emtricitabine (FTC) plus efavirenz (EFV), 252 (16.7%) plus lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), 129 (8.5%) plus atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r), 110 (7.3%) plus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) and 102 (6.7%) plus nevirapine (NVP). Among 414 patients who switched therapy, reason for switching was available for 393. The most frequent reasons were toxicity (40%), simplification (14%) and treatment failure/resistance (13%). In multivariate analyses, there were significant differences in the risk of TC according to initial cART regimen (P<0.001). Initiating TDF plus FTC with NVP (sHR 1.94, 95% CI 1.38, 2.72) or LPV/r (sHR 1.89, 95% CI 1.45, 2.47) was associated with higher risk of TC than initiating with TDF plus FTC plus EFV. No differences in TC were found between initiating EFV versus ATV/r (sHR 1.29, 95% CI 0.89, 1.86) or DRV/r (sHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.59, 1.65) with TDF plus FTC as backbone. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from initial cART regimens is frequent, toxicity being the main reason for it. The significantly greater persistence of some combinations may be useful for making decisions when initiating cART.

The CD4/CD8 ratio in HIV-infected subjects is independently associated with T-cell activation despite long-term viral suppression.

OBJECTIVES: HIV-infected subjects on antiretroviral therapy often fail to normalize the CD4/CD8 ratio despite CD4 count normalization. We aimed to analyze the biological significance of this finding. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis in 20 HIV-infected subjects on stable triple-ART, plasma HIV RNA <40 copies/mL for at least 2 years and CD4 count >350 cells/mm(3). Laboratory measurements included T-cell activation (HLADR(+), CD38(+)) and senescence (CD57(+)), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), sCD14 and the HIV latent reservoir (number of latently infected memory CD4 cells carrying replication-competent virus). RESULTS: CD4/CD8 ratio was positively correlated with CD4 nadir (r = 0.468, p = 0.038) and accumulated ART exposure (r = 0.554, p = 0.0011), and negatively with viral load before ART initiation (r = -0.547, p = 0.013), CD4(+)HLADR(+)CD38(+) T-cells (r = -0.428, p = 0.086) and CD8(+)CD57(+) T-cells (r = -0.431, p = 0.084). No associations with LPS, sCD14 or HIV latent reservoir were found. After the multivariate analyses, the CD4/CD8 ratio remained independently associated with CD4(+)HLADR(+)CD38(+) T-cells and CD8(+)HLADR(+) T-cells. CONCLUSIONS: In our study in subjects on suppressive ART the CD4/CD8 ratio was independently associated with T-cell activation. Our results must be confirmed in larger studies, as this parameter might be a useful clinical tool to identify subjects with ongoing immune activation despite long-term viral suppression.