Cardiovascular and renal effects of bromocriptine in diabetic patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of bromocriptine (BEC) on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and residual renal function (RRF) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 6-month double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted in 28 patients with T2D and stage 4 CKD with increased LVMI. Fourteen patients received BEC (2.5 mg, initially 1 tablet with subsequent increase to three times a day) and 14 received a placebo (PBO; initially 1 tablet with subsequent increase to three times a day). Cardiovascular changes were assessed by monitoring 24 h ambulatory blood pressure, two-dimensional-guided M-mode echocardiography, and N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma levels. RRF was evaluated by creatinine clearance and cystatin-C plasma levels. RESULTS: Both BEC and PBO groups decreased blood pressure-but the effect was more pronounced in the BEC group. Average 24 h, diurnal and nocturnal blood pressures, and circadian profile showed improved values compared to the PBO group; LVMI decreased by 14% in BEC and increased by 8% in PBO group. NT-proBNP decreased in BEC (0.54 ± 0.15 to 0.32 ± 0.17 pg/mL) and increased in PBO (0.37 ± 0.15 to 0.64 ± 0.17 pg/mL). Creatinine clearance did not change in the BEC group and decreased in the PBO group. CONCLUSIONS: BEC resulted in a decrease on blood pressure and LVMI. BEC also prevented the progression of CKD while maintaining the creatinine clearance unchanged.

Prediction of the time-course pattern of remission in depression by using clinical, neuropsychological, and genetic variables.

BACKGROUND: The prediction of remission in pharmacologically-treated MDD patients has been scarcely studied. The goal of our work is to study the possible effect of clinical variables, neuropsychological performance, and the 5HTTLPR, the rs25531 of the SLC6A4 gene, and the val108/58Met of the COMT gene polymorphisms on the prediction of the speed of remission in MDD patients. METHODS: Seventy-two depressed patients were genotyped according to the aforementioned polymorphisms and were clinically and neuropsychologically assessed before a 12-week fluoxetine treatment. RESULTS: From this original sample 51 patients were considered as remitters at the end of week 12. Thirteen out of those showed a rapid response pattern, 24 showed an oscillating response pattern, and 14 showed a slow response pattern. The following variable combination is capable of showing a statistically significant relationship with the pattern of remission of patients with MDD: initial Hamilton score, age at first depressive episode, AG and GG alleles of the val108/58Met COMT polymorphism, Stroop PC, and SWM Strategy. LIMITATIONS: We have a slightly small sample size, which came to prominence during the data analysis since we were working with 3 subgroups. In this study, the placebo effect has not been controlled. DISCUSSION: Our data suggest that the patients with MDD who remit after a 12-week treatment with fluoxetine show one of the following time-course patterns: a rapid symptomatic improvement, or a slow or oscillating pattern of remission. A combination of clinical, neuropsychological, and genetic variables allows us to predict these response patterns.

Prediction of remission of depression with clinical variables, neuropsychological performance, and serotonergic/dopaminergic gene polymorphisms.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our work is to study the possible role of clinical variables, neuropsychological performance, and the 5HTTLPR, rs25531, and val108/58Met COMT polymorphisms on the prediction of depression remission after 12 weeks' treatment with fluoxetine. These variables have been studied as potential predictors of depression remission, but they present poor prognostic sensitivity and specificity by themselves. METHODS: Seventy-two depressed patients were genotyped according to the aforementioned polymorphisms and were clinically and neuropsychologically assessed before a 12-week fluxetine treatment. RESULTS: Only the La allele of rs25531 polymorphism and the GG and AA forms of the val 108/158 Met polymorphism predict major depressive disorder remission after 12 weeks' treatment with fluoxetine. None of the clinical and neuropsychological variables studied predicted remission. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that clinical and neuropsychological variables can initially predict early response to fluoxetine and mask the predictive role of genetic variables; but in remission, where clinical and neuropsychological symptoms associated with depression tend to disappear thanks to the treatment administered, the polymorphisms studied are the only variables in our model capable of predicting remission. However, placebo effects that are difficult to control require cautious interpretation of the results.

Preemptive analgesic effectiveness of oral ketorolac plus local tramadol afterimpacted mandibular third molar surgery

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare preemptive analgesia of oral ketorolac plus submucous localplacebo with oral ketorolac plus submucous local tramadol after impacted mandibular third molar surgery.Study design: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Patients were randomizedinto two treatment groups (n = 15 per group): group A, oral ketorolac 10 mg, 30 minutes before surgeryplus submucous local placebo (1 mL saline solution); group B, oral ketorolac 10 mg, 30 minutes before surgeryplus submucous local tramadol (50 mg diluted in 1 mL saline solution). We evaluated the intensity of pain, timefor the first analgesic rescue medication, and total analgesic consumption.Results: Pain intensity, number of patients requiring analgesic rescue medication, number of patients in each groupnot requiring analgesic rescue medication, and total analgesic consumption showed statistical significance.Conclusions: Preemptive use of oral ketorolac plus submucous local tramadol is an alternative treatment for acutepain after surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar (AU)

No disponible

Preemptive analgesic effectiveness of oral ketorolac plus local tramadol after impacted mandibular third molar surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare preemptive analgesia of oral ketorolac plus submucous local placebo with oral ketorolac plus submucous local tramadol after impacted mandibular third molar surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Patients were randomized into two treatment groups (n = 15 per group): group A, oral ketorolac 10 mg, 30 minutes before surgery plus submucous local placebo (1 mL saline solution); group B, oral ketorolac 10 mg, 30 minutes before surgery plus submucous local tramadol (50 mg diluted in 1 mL saline solution). We evaluated the intensity of pain, time for the first analgesic rescue medication, and total analgesic consumption. RESULTS: Pain intensity, number of patients requiring analgesic rescue medication, number of patients in each group not requiring analgesic rescue medication, and total analgesic consumption showed statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive use of oral ketorolac plus submucous local tramadol is an alternative treatment for acute pain after surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar.

The role of clinical variables, neuropsychological performance and SLC6A4 and COMT gene polymorphisms on the prediction of early response to fluoxetine in major depressive disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is treated with antidepressants, but only between 50% and 70% of the patients respond to the initial treatment. Several authors suggested different factors that could predict antidepressant response, including clinical, psychophysiological, neuropsychological, neuroimaging, and genetic variables. However, these different predictors present poor prognostic sensitivity and specificity by themselves. The aim of our work is to study the possible role of clinical variables, neuropsychological performance, and the 5HTTLPR, rs25531, and val108/58Met COMT polymorphisms in the prediction of the response to fluoxetine after 4weeks of treatment in a sample of patient with MDD. METHODS: 64 patients with MDD were genotyped according to the above-mentioned polymorphisms, and were clinically and neuropsychologically assessed before a 4-week fluoxetine treatment. Fluoxetine response was assessed by using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. We carried out a binary logistic regression model for the potential predictive variables. RESULTS: Out of the clinical variables studied, only the number of anxiety disorders comorbid with MDD have predicted a poor response to the treatment. A combination of a good performance in variables of attention and low performance in planning could predict a good response to fluoxetine in patients with MDD. None of the genetic variables studied had predictive value in our model. LIMITATIONS: The possible placebo effect has not been controlled. Our study is focused on response prediction but not in remission prediction. CONCLUSIONS: Our work suggests that the combination of the number of comorbid anxiety disorders, an attentional variable, and two planning variables makes it possible to correctly classify 82% of the depressed patients who responded to the treatment with fluoxetine, and 74% of the patients who did not respond to that treatment.

Effects of selective serotonin reuptake and dual serotonergic-noradrenergic reuptake treatments on attention and executive functions in patients with major depressive disorder.

Several reports suggest that antidepressants may improve cognitive functioning in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The present work aims to study the effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonergic-noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) treatments on the performance of working memory, attention and executive functions in patients with MDD. A total of 73 subjects meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders version IV (DSM-IV) criteria for MDD, and 37 control subjects were assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and a neuropsychological battery. The subjects were medicated with escitalopram (n=36) or duloxetine (n=37) for 24 weeks. At the end of the trial, the subjects were assessed again with the same tests. The depressed subjects showed alterations in attention and cognitive functions when compared to the control group. The administration of both treatments improved working memory, as well as attention and all the executive functions, but the cognitive functions of depressed patients do not improve enough to reach the levels of performance of the control subjects. Our results suggest that both SSRI and SNRI treatments presented the same efficacy in improving attention and the remaining executive functions.

Major Depressive Disorder in recovery and neuropsychological functioning: effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and dual inhibitor depression treatments on residual cognitive deficits in patients with Major Depressive Disorder in recovery.

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive disturbances in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) could persist beyond the symptomatic phase of the illness. However, the works addressing this topic did not usually account for the possible impact of medication on the cognitive functions of depressed patients. The present study aims to investigate whether MDD patients in remission treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) or dual serotonergic-noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) show cognitive deficits, to study whether the same patients suffer neuropsychological disturbances when they are unmedicated and in recovery phase, and if the previous pharmacological treatment used to achieve the remission of MDD clinical symptoms had any effect in the profile of these patients' cognitive performance in the recovery phase. METHODS: Thirty-six subjects with MDD treated with escitalopram and 37 depressed patients with duloxetine were compared both in remission phase and 24 weeks later, when they were unmedicated and in recovery phase. They were also compared, in both moments, to 37 healthy subjects. RESULTS: The control subjects showed a broader better cognitive performance than MDD patients in both measurement moments, but several cognitive functions improved over time. Also, the patients treated with SNRI performed better in memory tests than the SNRI-treated patients in remission phase, and in recovery phase. LIMITATIONS: Our sample size is somewhat small, and we followed our patients only for 6months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive functions improve over time in patients with MDD beyond the remission phase, and the antidepressant treatment class used in acute depressive phase could influence his/her memory improvement.

Comorbidity of anxiety disorders in major depressive disorder. A clinical trial to evaluate neuropsychological deficit

Background and objectives: Various clinical aspects of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are related to the neuropsychological impairments characteristic of this illness. The aim of this study was to determine the relation between certain clinical variables of MDD – in particular the presence of comorbid anxiety disorders – and the neuropsychological performance of patients with MDD selected for a clinical trial. Methods: Using cluster analyses, we generated two groups of patients: one group with Major Depressive Disorder and a Comorbid Anxiety Disorder (MDDAD), and the other with Pure Major Depressive Disorder (PMDD). Both groups were assessed clinically and neuropsychological before and after 24 weeks of pharmacological treatment. Neuropsychological performance prior to treatment was comparable in the two groups. Results: After treatment, both groups showed cognitive improvement in attention tasks, memory, and executive functions Conclusions: The PMDD group obtained greater neurocognitive benefits from the antidepressive treatment than the MDDAD group (AU)

No disponible

Effects of selective serotonin reuptake and dual serotonergic-noradrenergic reuptake treatments on memory and mental processing speed in patients with major depressive disorder.

Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) usually suffer from altered cognitive functions of episodic memory, working memory, mental processing speed and motor response. Diverse studies suggest that different antidepressant agents may improve cognitive functions in patients with MDD. The aim of this work is to study the effects of serotonergic reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonergic-noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) treatments to improve the performance on memory tasks and mental processing speed in MDD. Seventy-three subjects meeting criteria for major depressive disorder were assessed with the Hamilton depression rating scale and a neuropsychological battery. The subjects were medicated with escitalopram (n=36) or duloxetine (n=37) for 24 weeks. At the end of the trial, the subjects were assessed again with the same neuropsychological battery used prior to the treatment. Both treatments improved importantly the episodic memory and to a lesser extent, working memory, mental processing speed and motor performance. Our results suggest that cognition is partially independent from improvement in clinical symptoms. Both groups achieved remission rates in the HAM-D-17 after 24 weeks of treatment, but SNRI was superior to SSRI at improving episodic and working memory. Our work indicates that the superiority of SNRI over the SSRI at episodic memory improvement is clinically relevant.

Demostración de la bioequivalencia clínica de Teldane y Feliberal mediante un bioensayo con reto de histamina intradérmica en voluntarios sanos / Demonstration of the Teldane and Feliberal clinical bioequivalence by means of bioassay with intradermical histminet trial in healthy volonteers

Para demostrar la bioequivalencia de dos formulaciones de Terfenadina, se diseño un estudio de equivalencia clínica, en el que se evaluó la eficacia del antihistamínico en la prevención de la respuesta por reto con histamina intradérmica en 12 voluntarios sanos, en un modelo doble ciego, cruzado, por bloques de tratamiento asignados aleatoriamente y durante siete días. Se determinó la respuesta dérmica de concentraciones de histamina de 0, 1, 5 y 10 mcg, mediante la medición de las ronchas provocadas tras su inyección en la región deltoidea, esto se hizo de control, una hora después de la primera dosis y 11 hioras después de la segunda y la última dosis de cada tratamiento. Los resultados obtenidos demostraron semejanza en cuanto a latencia, magnitud y duración del efecto protector al reto histamínico con ambas formulaciones, esto comprueba su equivalencia clínica y sugiere similar biodisponibilidad