Meaning-Making Among Parents of Children With Severe Neurologic Impairment in the PICU.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Parents and family caregivers of children with severe neurologic impairment (SNI) experience many stressors, especially during their child's critical illness. This study aimed to examine parent experiences around the time of their child's PICU care to explore ways parents make meaning in relation to these stressors. METHODS: This qualitative study of data from a single center in the United States followed Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. One to one semistructured interviews queried parents' psychosocial well-being around the time of their child's PICU care. Eligible participants had a child with an SNI condition for >3 months admitted to the PICU for >24 hours with an expected length of stay >1 week. RESULTS: Data were analyzed by a research team with expertise in palliative care, psychology, critical care, and qualitative methods. Fifteen family caregivers of 15 children participated. Children were a median of 8 years old (interquartile range 4-11.5) and 80% (n = 12) had congenital/genetic conditions. Parent/family caregivers were a median age of 39 years old (interquartile range 36-42.5); 20% (n = 3) self-identified as fathers and 47% (n = 7) as having to a minority racial background. Parents discussed ongoing meaning-making that occurred through domains of comprehension and purpose, and themes of understanding of other people and the world around them. Subthemes focused on appreciation/acceptance, adaptability/accountability, valuing all lives, and learning/teaching about their child. CONCLUSIONS: Meaning-making may be an opportunity for support in the PICU among parents/family caregivers of children with SNI.

"It's a Heavy Thing to Carry:" Internal Medicine and Pediatric Resident Experiences Caring for Dying Patients.

BACKGROUND: Residents often feel unprepared to care for dying patients and may benefit from more training. Little is known about factors in the clinical setting that promote resident learning about end of life (EOL) care. OBJECTIVES: This qualitative study aimed to characterize the experiences of residents caring for dying patients and elucidate the impact of emotional, cultural, and logistical factors on learning. METHODS: 6 US internal medicine and 8 pediatric residents who had cared for at least 1 dying patient completed a semi-structured one-on-one interview between 2019 and 2020. Residents described an experience caring for a dying patient including their confidence in clinical skills, emotional experience, role within the interdisciplinary team, and perspective on how to improve their education. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and investigators conducted content analysis to generate themes. RESULTS: 3 themes (with subthemes) emerged: (1) experiencing strong emotion or tension (loss of patient personhood, emerging professional identity, emotional dissonance); (2) processing the experience (innate resilience, team support); and (3) recognition of a new perspective or skill (bearing witness, meaning making, recognizing biases, emotional work of doctoring). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests a model for the process by which residents learn affective skills critical to EOL care: residents (1) notice strong emotion, (2) reflect on the meaning of the emotion, and (3) crystallize this reflection into a new perspective or skill. Educators can use this model to develop educational methods that emphasize normalization of physician emotions and space for processing and professional identity formation.

The Pediatric Palliative Care Quality Network: Palliative Care Consultation and Patient Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Quality benchmarking in pediatric palliative care (PPC) helps identify gaps in care and guides quality improvement. Our study objective was to characterize inpatient PPC referral processes, interdisciplinary PPC delivery, and patient outcomes from a multisite PPC data repository. METHODS: Cross-sectional, administrative data analysis of 1587 PPC inpatient encounters at 5 US hospitals enrolled in the Pediatric Palliative Care Quality Network (2016-2022). PPC clinicians submitted data to a national repository for key quality indicators. Program and referral characteristics, care processes, and outcomes were examined descriptively. Time to referral, time on PPC service, and total hospital length of stay were compared by discharge disposition (alive or dead). RESULTS: Programs were in service for 13 (range 6-17) years on average. Most encounters involved children >1 year old (77%). Common diagnoses were solid tumor cancer (29%) and congenital or chromosomal conditions (14%). Care was often provided by ≤2 PPC team members (53%) until discharge (median = 7d, interquartile range 2-23). There were often multiple reasons for PPC referral, including psychosocial support (78%), goals of care discussions/advance care planning (42%), management of non-pain symptoms (34%), and pain (21%). Moderate-severe symptoms improved by second assessment for pain (71%), dyspnea (51%), fatigue (46%), and feeding issues (39%). CONCLUSIONS: Referrals to PPC were made early during hospitalization for psychosocial and physical symptom management. Moderate-severe symptom distress scores at initial assessment often improved. Findings highlight the need to ensure interdisciplinary PPC team staffing to meet the complex care needs of seriously ill children.

Navigating Stress in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Among Parents of Children with Severe Neurological Impairment.

CONTEXT: Children with severe neurological impairment (SNI) make up nearly 50% of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions, yet little is known about their family caregiver experiences. OBJECTIVE: To examine how parents and family caregivers of children with SNI navigate stress during PICU admissions. METHODS: This qualitative single-center study used content and thematic networks analysis to evaluate data from 1:1 semistructured interviews conducted around the time of PICU discharge with parents and family caregivers of children with SNI to examine ways they navigate stress. Proportions of participants reporting each theme and subtheme were calculated. RESULTS: Fifteen parents/family caregivers of 15 children with SNI participated. Children were a median of 8 years old (range 1-21 years) and the majority had congenital/chromosomal conditions leading to their neurologic condition (80%, n = 12). 20% of participants were fathers (n = 3) and 45% (n = 7) reported identifying as having a minority racial background. Themes included 1) self-activation, and 2) letting go and the majority (80%, n = 12) of parents reported using both self-activation and letting go strategies. Within each of these themes, 5 subthemes illustrated ways parents navigate stress. The most reported subthemes were advocating and showing up (53%, n = 8) and being supported by compassionate clinicians (67%, n = 10). Themes/subthemes were used to create recommended language to guide clinicians in supporting parents. CONCLUSION: Parents and family caregivers of children with SNI employ various ways to navigate stress in the PICU. Themes from this study can be used to develop interventions that meet the psychosocial needs of parents and family caregivers of children with SNI during highly stressful times.

Goals of Care Among Parents of Children Receiving Palliative Care.

Importance: While knowing the goals of care (GOCs) for children receiving pediatric palliative care (PPC) are crucial for guiding the care they receive, how parents prioritize these goals and how their priorities may change over time is not known. Objective: To determine parental prioritization of GOCs and patterns of change over time for parents of children receiving palliative care. Design, Setting, and Participants: A Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network's Shared Data and Research cohort study with data collected at 0, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months in hospital, outpatient, or home settings from April 10, 2017, to February 15, 2022, at 7 PPC programs based at children's hospitals across the US. Participants included parents of patients, birth to 30 years of age, who received PPC services. Exposures: Analyses were adjusted for demographic characteristics, number of complex chronic conditions, and time enrolled in PPC. Main Outcomes: Parents' importance scores, as measured using a discrete choice experiment, of 5 preselected GOCs: seeking quality of life (QOL), health, comfort, disease modification, or life extension. Importance scores for the 5 GOCs summed to 100. Results: A total of 680 parents of 603 patients reported on GOCs. Median patient age was 4.4 (IQR, 0.8-13.2) years and 320 patients were male (53.1%). At baseline, parents scored QOL as the most important goal (mean score, 31.5 [SD, 8.4]), followed by health (26.3 [SD, 7.5]), comfort (22.4 [SD, 11.7]), disease modification (10.9 [SD, 9.2]), and life extension (8.9 [SD, 9.9]). Importantly, parents varied substantially in their baseline scores for each goal (IQRs more than 9.4), but across patients in different complex chronic conditions categories, the mean scores varied only slightly (means differ 8.7 or less). For each additional study month since PPC initiation, QOL was scored higher by 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.08) and comfort scored higher by 0.3 (95% CI, 0-0.06), while the importance score for life extension decreased by 0.07 (95% CI, 0.04-0.09) and disease modification by 0.02 (95% CI, 0-0.04); health scores did not significantly differ from PPC initiation. Conclusions and Relevance: Parents of children receiving PPC placed the highest value on QOL, but with considerable individual-level variation and substantial change over time. These findings emphasize the importance of reassessing GOCs with parents to guide appropriate clinical intervention.

Barriers to Pediatric Palliative Care: Trainee and Faculty Perspectives Across Two Academic Centers.

Objective: Barriers to palliative care for children with serious illness include system constraints and vastly different training and attitudes toward palliative care. This study aimed to explore trainee and faculty physician perceptions of barriers to palliative care across two pediatric centers to (1) examine differences between trainees and faculty and (2) compare these data with previous studies. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted in fall 2021 among pediatric trainees and faculty physicians at three pediatric hospitals in two pediatric centers in the western United States. Surveys were distributed through hospital listservs and analyzed descriptively and through inductive thematic analysis. Results: There were a total of 268 participants: 50 trainees and 218 faculty physicians. Of the trainees, 46% (23) were fellows and 54% (27) were pediatric residents. Trainees and faculty reported the same four most common barriers, which were consistent with previous studies: family not ready to acknowledge an incurable condition (64% trainees and 45% faculty); family preference for more life-sustaining therapies than staff (52% and 39%); uncertain prognosis (48% and 38%); and parent discomfort with possibility of hastening death (44% and 30%). Other barriers commonly reported included time constraints, staff shortages, and conflict among family about treatment goals. Language barriers and cultural differences were also cited. Conclusions: This study examining palliative care across two pediatric centers suggests that providers' perceptions of family preferences and understanding of illness persist as barriers to the delivery of pediatric palliative care services. Future research should examine family-centered and culturally mindful interventions to better elucidate family perspectives on their child's illness to align care.

Measuring Pediatric Palliative Care Quality: Challenges and Opportunities.

Pediatric palliative care (PPC) programs vary widely in structure, staffing, funding, and patient census, resulting in inconsistency in service provision. Improving the quality of palliative care for children living with serious illness and their families requires measuring care quality, ensuring that quality measurement is embedded into day-to-day clinical practice, and aligning quality measurement with healthcare policy priorities. Yet, numerous challenges exist in measuring PPC quality. This paper provides an overview of PPC quality measurement, including challenges, current initiatives, and future opportunities. While important strides toward addressing quality measurement challenges in PPC have been made, including ongoing quality measurement initiatives like the Cambia Metrics Project, the PPC What Matters Most study, and collaborative learning networks, more work remains. Providing high-quality PPC to all children and families will require a multi-pronged approach. In this paper, we suggest several strategies for advancing high-quality PPC, which includes 1) considering how and by whom success is defined, 2) evaluating, adapting, and developing PPC measures, including those that address care disparities within PPC for historically marginalized and excluded communities, 3) improving the infrastructure with which to routinely and prospectively measure, monitor, and report clinical and administrative quality measures, 4) increasing endorsement of PPC quality measures by prominent quality organizations to facilitate accountability and possible reimbursement, and 5) integrating PPC-specific quality measures into the administrative, funding, and policy landscape of pediatric healthcare.

Allowing Relationships to Unfold: Consult Reason and Topics Discussed in Initial and Subsequent Palliative Care Visits Among Children Who Died From Relapsed/Refractory Cancer.

Background: Children with relapsed/refractory cancer have a myriad of palliative care needs. While pediatric oncology clinicians meet many of these needs, studies suggest that these children often have distressing symptoms and that families feel unprepared for their child's end-of-life (EOL). Oncology clinicians cite barriers to pediatric palliative care (PPC) consultation, including concerns that PPC teams will upset families with EOL discussions. This study evaluated topics addressed by PPC teams over the course of their relationship with children who died from cancer. Methods: Retrospective chart review of children who were diagnosed with relapsed/refractory cancer, received PPC consultation at an academic children's hospital, and died between January 2008 and January 2017. Information was extracted regarding the child's treatment, EOL care, and the content of PPC consultation over the course of the team's relationship with the child/family. Results: Fifty-six children were included in the analysis. The most frequent reasons for the initial consult were pain (n = 31, 55%) and non-pain symptom management (n = 18, 32%). At the initial consult, the PPC team most often discussed symptom management and psychosocial support. Prognosis was not discussed in any initial consult. Over subsequent visits, the PPC team expanded their scope of discussion to include goals of care, advance care planning, and hospice. Discussion: Concerns from oncology clinicians that PPC teams will extend beyond the reasons for initial consult into prognostic/EOL discussions at the first visit may be unfounded. Greater familiarity with PPC team practices may facilitate more timely consultation of PPC and its complementary set of services.

Development of Primary Palliative Care End-of-Life Quality Measures: A Modified Delphi Process.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) and their families deserve high-quality pediatric palliative care (PPC) throughout their illness trajectory, including at end of life (EOL). Standard EOL quality measures (QM) have only recently been proposed, require surveys and/or manual chart review, and focus on children with cancer. Therefore, we aimed to develop expert-endorsed, hospital-based, primary PPC quality measures for EOL care for all children with CCCs that could be automatically abstracted from the electronic health record (EHR). METHODS: We followed a modified Delphi approach for expert opinion gathering, including: (1) a comprehensive literature review of existing adult and pediatric measures (>200 measures); (2) formation of a multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 9); (3) development of a list of candidate measures (20 measures); (4) national survey to assess each QM's importance and abstraction feasibility and propose new measures (respondents = 95); and (5) final expert panel endorsement. RESULTS: Seventeen EHR-abstractable QM were endorsed in 5 domains: (1) health care utilization: 4 measures (eg, <2 emergency department visits in the last 30 days of life); (2) interprofessional services: 4 measures (eg, PPC in the last 30 days of life); (3) medical intensity: 5 measures (eg, death outside the ICU); (4) symptom management: 2 measures (eg, documented pain score within 24 hours of admission); and (5) communication: 2 measures (eg, code status documentation). CONCLUSIONS: This study developed a list of EHR-abstractable, hospital-based primary PPC EOL QM, providing a foundation for quality improvement initiatives and further measure development in the future.

Relationships and Resources Supporting Children With Serious Illness and Their Parents.

OBJECTIVE: Children with complex chronic conditions (CCCs) and their parents benefit from supportive serious illness care when their conditions are severe and impact their quality of life and stress. This includes not only expert medical care but also effective relationships with the clinical team. Existing data suggest that there are opportunities for improvement. This study's aim was to explore important aspects of the relationships and resources that facilitate supportive serious illness care among children with CCCs and their parents. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with CCCs (aged 13-35 years), and parents of children with CCCs across 2 academic pediatric centers in the United States from December 2018 to April 2019. Transcripts were iteratively coded and analyzed by a team that included a sociologist, pediatric intensivist, and palliative care researcher by using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Seven AYAs with CCCs and 9 parents participated (16 total; 1 AYA-parent dyad). Two key categories were identified around relationships with the clinical team: trust and fostering collaboration. Three key categories related to resources are information needs, making sense of life with illness, and supportive community. Many of the key categories and themes identified by participants had both tangible and intangible components and revealed the distinct yet interconnected nature of these aspects of care. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness and cultivation of relationship and resource support through innovative interventions and attention to those with increased needs in these areas may improve the serious illness care provided to children with CCCs and their parents.

The Impact of Caring for Children With Severe Neurological Impairment on Clinicians.

Clinicians face many challenges in caring for children with severe neurological impairment (SNI). This study aimed to understand expert clinician perspectives on the personal impact of caring for children with SNI to highlight the challenges and potential solutions by underscoring the aspects of care that can be sustaining. Twenty-five clinicians participated including physicians (n = 8, 32%), social workers (n = 5, 20%), nurses/nurse practitioners (n = 5, 20%), case managers (n = 3, 12%), developmental therapists (n = 2, 8%), and other psychosocial clinicians (n = 2, 8%). Clinicians represented a variety of specialties including complex care/hospitalists (n = 10, 19%), palliative care (n = 7, 13%), and critical care (n = 6, 12%). Thematic content analysis revealed 3 major themes: (1) worries and challenges; (2) positive impact from being present; and (3) personal growth and meaning-making. Many clinicians described the ways listening, examining biases, learning about family perspectives, and normalizing the need for emotional processing helped them to understand their patients, families, and themselves more deeply.

A Qualitative Study of Clinicians and Parents of Children with Severe Neurological Impairment on Tools to Support Family-Centered Care.

Background: Children with severe neurological impairment (SNI) have complex conditions and require family-centered care, yet, this is challenging in the hospital. Objectives: To describe themes related to building parent-clinician rapport and to examine ways to promote family-centered care for children with SNI. Design: Post hoc secondary analysis of data from a qualitative cross-sectional study. Setting/Subjects: Semistructured interviews conducted between August 2019 and February 2020 with parents of children with SNI and interprofessional clinicians at a single tertiary children's hospital in the United States. Measurement: Data from codes pertaining to strategies to promote therapeutic alliance were extracted for inductive thematic analysis and to collate ideas for tools suggested by participants. The research team iteratively discussed each proposed tool, developed an example representative depiction, and expanded upon potential opportunities and limitations of the tools' practical implementation. Results: Twenty-five parents/legal guardians and 25 interprofessional clinicians participated. The median age of parents/legal guardians was 38 [interquartile range 35,48]. Sixty-eight percent (n = 17) identified as mothers and 68% (n = 17) identified as white. Clinicians were predominantly female (84%, n = 21) and represented 8 professions and 15 specialties. Themes and suggested tools included (1) continuity of previous decision-making conversations and the decision roadmap tool, (2) maintaining family communication preferences and the relational handoff tool, and (3) recognizing the abilities of each individual child and the developmental inventory tool. Conclusions: Family-centered care for parents of children with SNI may be bolstered by continuity in decision making, maintaining parents' communication preferences, and appreciating the child's individual abilities. Clinical tools may provide opportunities to promote these concepts.

Survey of Pediatric Palliative Care Quality Improvement Training, Activities, and Barriers.

CONTEXT: Children with serious illness deserve high-quality pediatric palliative care (PPC). With expansion of PPC provision, it is important to understand the quality improvement (QI) activities of PPC clinicians and programs. OBJECTIVES: To describe the 1) background, education/training, and activities in QI and 2) perceived barriers to QI efforts among PPC clinicians and programs nationally. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to members of the Pediatric Palliative Improvement Network, the National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care Pediatric Task Force, and the PPC Research Network as part of a study to develop hospital-based, primary PPC quality measures. Surveys queried participants' background, education/training, individual/team QI efforts, and barriers to QI work. Results were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Of the 95 respondents; most were female (84 [88%]) and/or white (84 [88%]). The majority (57 [54%]) were physicians, although participants represented a variety of clinical disciplines, researchers (10 [9%]), and administrators (6 [6%]). One-quarter (25 [26%]) reported having <10 hours total of training in QI, yet two-third (63 [66%]) participated in QI work. About one-third (35 [37%]) reported that their program had no dedicated staff for QI activities, yet over half (56 [59%]) of participants reported that their team participated in QI work. Participants reported that lack of personnel/time, standardized measures/tools, education/training/mentoring in QI, systems to promote QI work, and financing/grants were barriers. CONCLUSION: Over half of PPC participants in this study reported involvement in QI activities despite limited staffing/time, QI training, and standardized measures, which presents challenges to this work.

Grief Trajectories of Bereaved Parents of Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis Using Phenomenology.

Different parents grieve differently. However, research directed at understanding the important contextual or individual factors that influence the path each bereaved parent takes is lacking. In this qualitative analysis we seek to understand the array of bereaved parent experiences more completely. By deeply diving into one parent dyad using interpretive phenomenology analysis and situating that story within the conventional content analysis of 13 other bereaved parents of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) who died from advanced cancer, we illustrate the roles of religion/spirituality, maintaining a connection, and fulfilling parental roles as elements of grief processing. Clinicians and investigators should consider similar individualized approaches to understanding and supporting the grief experiences of bereaved parents before and after the death of a child.

Pediatric Hospice and Palliative Care Services and Needs Across the Northwest United States.

CONTEXT: Given workforce and funding constraints, pediatric hospice and palliative care clinicians often find challenges providing services for seriously ill children and families, particularly in low resource and rural/remote areas. OBJECTIVES: To describe the services, training, and education needs of pediatric hospice and palliative care programs across the Northwest United States as part of the formation of a new regional coalition. METHODS: Electronic surveys were sent to pediatric hospice and palliative care clinicians through state organizations as part of an email invitation to join the Northwest Pediatric Palliative Care Coalition. Data were analyzed descriptively using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-four participants representing 37 unique programs responded from seven states, including Washington (41%, n=27), Oregon (38%, n=25), Idaho (11%, n=7), Alaska (5%, n=3), Montana (3%, n=2), Colorado (2%, n=1), and Nevada (2%, n=1). Programs provided pediatric hospice care (42%, n=33/78) and palliative care services (30%, n=26/86). Although 26% (n=15/58) had been providing pediatric hospice and palliative care for >20 years, 40% (n=21/53) reported only serving <5 pediatric patients per year. Specific services provided included pediatric bereavement support (16%, n=37/231), telehealth (14%, n=33/231), and respite (10%, n=23/231). Barriers occurring always, often, or sometimes included lack of trained staff (84%), financial support (59%), and access to home infusions (48%). From the coalition, participants prioritized education on parent/caregiver psychosocial support (40%, n=19/48), goals of care communication (44%, n=21/48), and symptom management (45%, n=21/47). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric hospice and palliative care clinicians face numerous barriers and may benefit from a coalition that provides networking and tailored education.

Forming Clinician-Parent Therapeutic Alliance for Children With Severe Neurologic Impairment.

OBJECTIVES: Care for children with severe neurologic impairment (SNI) often involves complex medical decision-making where therapeutic alliance between clinicians and families is essential. Yet, existing data suggest that communication and alliance are often lacking. This study aimed to examine aspects important to developing therapeutic alliance between clinicians and parents of children with SNI. METHODS: A purposive sample of expert clinicians and parents of children with SNI completed brief demographic surveys and 1:1 semistructured interviews between July 2019 and August 2020 at a single tertiary pediatric academic center. Interviews focused on the inpatient experience and transcriptions underwent thematic analysis by a study team of qualitative researchers with expertise in palliative care and communication science. RESULTS: Twenty-five parents and 25 clinicians participated (total n = 50). Many parents were mothers (n = 17, 68%) of school-aged children with congenital/chromosomal conditions (n = 15, 65%). Clinicians represented 8 professions and 15 specialties. Responses from participants suggested 3 major themes that build and sustain therapeutic alliance including: (1) foundational factors that must exist to establish rapport; (2) structural factors that provide awareness of the parent/child experience; and (3) weathering factors that comprise the protection, security, and additional support during hard or uncertain times. Participants also shared concrete actions that promote these factors in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic alliance between clinicians and parents of children with SNI consists of at least 3 factors that support communication and medical decision-making. These factors are facilitated by concrete actions and practices, which enhance communication about the care for children with SNI.