Machine learning-based prediction of conversion coefficients for I-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine heart-to-mediastinum ratio.

PURPOSE: We developed a method of standardizing the heart-to-mediastinal ratio in 123I-labeled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) images using a conversion coefficient derived from a dedicated phantom. This study aimed to create a machine-learning (ML) model to estimate conversion coefficients without using a phantom. METHODS: 210 Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of 123I-MIBG images to obtain conversion coefficients using collimators that differed in terms of hole diameter, septal thickness, and length. Simulated conversion coefficients and collimator parameters were prepared as training datasets, then a gradient-boosting ML was trained to estimate conversion coefficients from collimator parameters. Conversion coefficients derived by ML were compared with those that were MC simulated and experimentally derived from 613 phantom images. RESULTS: Conversion coefficients were superior when estimated by ML compared with the classical multiple linear regression model (root mean square deviations: 0.021 and 0.059, respectively). The experimental, MC simulated, and ML-estimated conversion coefficients agreed, being, respectively, 0.54, 0.55, and 0.55 for the low-; 0.74, 0.70, and 0.72 for the low-middle; and 0.88, 0.88, and 0.88 for the medium-energy collimators. CONCLUSIONS: The ML model estimated conversion coefficients without the need for phantom experiments. This means that conversion coefficients were comparable when estimated based on collimator parameters and on experiments.

Calibrated scintigraphic imaging procedures improve quantitative assessment of the cardiac sympathetic nerve activity.

The 123I-labeled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is an analogue of noradrenaline that can evaluate cardiac sympathetic activity in scintigraphy. Quantitative analysis of 123I-MIBG images has been verified in patients with heart failure and neurodegenerative diseases. However, quantitative results differ due to variations in scintigraphic imaging procedures. Here, we created and assessed the clinical feasibility of a calibration method for 123I-MIBG imaging. The characteristics of scintigraphic imaging systems were determined using an acrylic calibration phantom to generate a multicenter phantom imaging database. Calibration factors corresponding to the scintigraphic imaging procedures were calculated from the database and applied to a clinical study. The results of this study showed that the calibrated analysis eliminated inter-institutional differences among normal individuals. In summary, our standardization methodology for 123I-MIBG scintigraphy could provide the basis for improved diagnostic precision and better outcomes for patients.

Effects of an anesthetic mixture of medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol and antagonism by atipamezole in rabbits.

Medetomidine (MED), midazolam (MID), and butorphanol (BUT) mixed anesthetic (MMB) has been used in laboratory animals since ketamine (KET) was designated as a narcotic in Japan in 2007. We previously reported that MMB produced anesthetic effects in mice and rats. We also demonstrated the efficacy of atipamezole (ATI), an antagonist of MED produced a quick recovery from anesthesia. Anesthetics have various anesthetic effects among different animal species. However, there is little information regarding its effects in rabbits. In the present study, we examined anesthetic effects of MMB compared to KET and xylazine mixed anesthetic (KX). We examined the antagonistic effects of ATI by intramuscular (IM) or intravenous (IV) injection in rabbits. We used the anesthetic score to measure surgical anesthetic duration and recovery time from anesthesia. During the experiments, we measured heart rate, respiratory rate, O2-saturation, and blood pressure. We found there were no significant differences in anesthetic duration and recovery time between MMB and KX. There were no significant differences in heart rate after administration of MMB or KX. Systolic blood pressure at 10 min after administration of MMB was higher than that of KX. The antagonistic effect of ATI by IV injection worked faster than that by IM injection. Overall, MMB is a useful drug that can induce similar anesthetic effects to KX and has an antagonist of ATI that makes rabbits quickly recover from anesthesia. These results may contribute to the welfare of laboratory animals, especially rabbits.

Development and validation of a direct-comparison method for cardiac (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine washout rates derived from late 3-hour and 4-hour imaging.

PURPOSE: The washout rate (WR) has been used in (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging to evaluate cardiac sympathetic innervation. However, WR varies depending on the time between the early and late MIBG scans. Late scans are performed at either 3 or 4 hours after injection of MIBG. The aim of this study was to directly compare the WR at 3 hours (WR3h) with the WR at 4 hours (WR4h). METHODS: We hypothesized that the cardiac count would reduce linearly between the 3-hour and 4-hour scans. A linear regression model for cardiac counts at two time-points was generated. We enrolled a total of 96 patients who underwent planar (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy early (15 min) and during the late phase at both 3 and 4 hours. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: a model-creation group (group 1) and a clinical validation group (group 2). Cardiac counts at 15 minutes (countearly), 3 hours (count3h) and 4 hours (count4h) were measured. Cardiac count4h was mathematically estimated using the linear regression model from countearly and count3h. RESULTS: In group 1, the actual cardiac count4h/countearly was highly significantly correlated with count3h/countearly (r = 0.979). In group 2, the average estimated count4h was 92.8 ± 31.9, and there was no significant difference between this value and the actual count4h (91.9 ± 31.9). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a small bias of -0.9 with 95 % limits of agreement of -6.2 and +4.3. WR4h calculated using the estimated cardiac count4h was comparable to the actual WR4h (24.3 ± 9.6 % vs. 25.1 ± 9.7 %, p = ns). Bland-Altman analysis and the intraclass correlation coefficient showed that there was excellent agreement between the estimated and actual WR4h. CONCLUSION: The linear regression model that we used accurately estimated cardiac count4h using countearly and count3h. Moreover, WR4h that was mathematically calculated using the estimated count4h was comparable to the actual WR4h.

Effects of an anesthetic mixture of medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol in rats-strain difference and antagonism by atipamezole.

An anesthetic mixture of medetomidine (MED), midazolam (MID), and butorphanol (BUT) has been used in laboratory animals. We previously reported that this anesthetic mixture produced closely similar anesthetic effects in BALB/c and C57BL/6J strains. We also demonstrated the efficacy of atipamezole (ATI), an antagonist of MED that produced quick recovery from anesthesia in mice. Anesthetics have various anesthetic effects among animal strains. However, the differences in the effects of anesthetic mixtures in rats are unclear. In the present study, we first examined effects of the abovementioned anesthetic mixture using three different rat strains: Wistar (WST), Sprague-Dawley (SD), and Fischer 344 (F344). Second, we examined how different dosages and optimum injection timing of ATI affected recovery from anesthesia in rats. We used the anesthetic score to measure anesthetic duration and a pulse oximeter to monitor vital signs. We found no significant differences in anesthetic duration among the three different strains. However, recovery from anesthesia in the SD strain took significantly longer than in the other strains. The antagonistic effects of ATI (0.15 mg/kg and 0.75 mg/kg) were equivalent when administered at 30 min after anesthetic mixture administration. The antagonistic effects of ATI 0.75 mg/kg were stronger than those of ATI 0.15 mg/kg at 10 min after anesthetic mixture administration. This anesthetic mixture is a useful drug that can induce similar anesthetic effects in three different strains and has an antagonist, ATI, that makes rats quickly recover from anesthesia. These results may contribute to the welfare of laboratory animals.

Anesthetic effects of a three-drugs mixture--comparison of administrative routes and antagonistic effects of atipamezole in mice.

The anesthetic mixture of medetomidine (MED), midazolam (MID) and butorphanol (BUT) produced anesthetic duration of around 40 minutes (min) in ICR mice. We reported that this anesthetic mixture produced almost the same anesthetic effects in both male and female BALB/c and C57BL/6J strains. Intraperitoneal (IP) administration of drugs has been widely used in mice. However, various injectable routes of the anesthetic mixture may cause different anesthetic effects. First, we examined effects of the anesthetic mixture by subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) injection compared to IP injection. After injection of the anesthetic mixture, administration of atipamezole (ATI) induced mice recovery from anesthesia. Secondly, we examined how different dosage and optimum injection timing of ATI affected mice recovery from anesthesia. We used an anesthetic score to measure anesthetic duration and a pulse oximeter to monitor vital signs under anesthesia. Usually, drugs from SC injection work more weakly than IP or IV injection. However, we found no significant differences of anesthetic duration among the three different injection routes. Antagonistic effects of ATI (0.3 mg/kg and 1.5 mg/kg) worked equally when administered at 30 min after injection of the anesthetic mixture. Antagonistic effects of ATI (1.5 mg/kg) were stronger than ATI (0.3 mg/kg) at 10 min after injection of the anesthetic mixture. The anesthetic mixture is a useful drug to induce nearly the same anesthetic effects by different injection routes and has an antagonist of ATI which helps mice quickly recover from anesthesia. These results may contribute to the welfare of laboratory animals.

Anesthetic effects of a mixture of medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol in two strains of mice.

The combination of ketamine and xylazine is a widely used anesthetic for laboratory animals. However, due to an abuse problem in Japan, ketamine has been specified as a narcotic since 2007. Instead of using ketamine, Kawai et al. reported an injectable formula with an equivalent effect to the mixture of ketamine and xylazine [11]. The mixture of 0.3 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) medetomidine (Med.), 4.0 mg/kg b.w. midazoram (Mid.), and 5.0 mg/kg b.w. butorphanol (But.) produced an anesthetic duration of around 40 min in outbred ICR mice. However, the anesthetic effect of the mixture for inbred mice strains remains unknown. Therefore, we examined anesthetic effects of the mixture of Med., Mid., and But. in the BALB/c and C57BL/6J strains. After intraperitoneal injection into mice, right front paw, left hind paw, and tail pinch reflexes as well as corneal and righting reflexes were observed. Every 5 min, we scored each reflex category as 0 for reaction or 1 for no reaction. As long as the total score was at least 4 out of 5, we considered the mixture as putting a mouse in a surgical anesthetic state. The mixture produced an anesthetic duration of more than 45 min in both strains of mice. These results indicate that the mixture of Med., Mid., and But. can be a useful and effective anesthesia for the BALB/c and C57BL/6J strains of inbred mice as well as outbred ICR mice.

Enhancement of morphine analgesic effect with induction of mu-opioid receptor endocytosis in rats.

BACKGROUND: Morphine can desensitize mu-opioid receptor (MOR), but it does not cause internalization of the receptor after binding. Acute desensitization of MOR impairs the efficiency of signaling, whereas the receptor internalization restores the cell responsiveness to the agonists. Thereby, the property of morphine may limit the analgesic effects of this opiate drug. It has been shown that [D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO), a potent MOR agonist inducing the internalization, facilitates morphine to internalize MOR, suggesting that MOR agonists with low relative activity versus endocytosis (RAVE) values such as DAMGO can potentiate analgesic effects of morphine through stimulating MOR internalization. The authors examined whether the acute analgesic effect of morphine can be potentiated by low relative activity versus endocytosis agonists DAMGO and fentanyl. METHODS: Rats injected intrathecally with opioids were subjected to a hot plate test for antinociceptive effect. Immunostained spinal dorsal horn was analyzed by confocal microscopy. RESULTS: Fentanyl induced MOR internalization to a lesser extent than DAMGO at equianalgesic doses. Coadministration of fentanyl promoted morphine-induced MOR internalization. The analgesic effect of morphine was greatly potentiated together with decrease in the relative activity versus endocytosis value when MOR internalization was induced by coadministration of a subanalgesic dose of DAMGO or fentanyl. In contrast, the combination of DAMGO and fentanyl increased neither the analgesic effect nor the internalization of MOR. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the coadministration of morphine with MOR-internalizing agonist is clinically applicable to develop successful pain-management regimens to achieve satisfactory analgesia using less morphine.

Comparative somatic and visceral antinociception and neurotoxicity of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and dextrobupivacaine in rats.

BACKGROUND: The current study investigated whether racemic bupivacaine and its S(-)- and R(+)-enantiomers, levobupivacaine and dextrobupivacaine, differ in somatic and visceral antinociception and neurotoxicity when administered intrathecally in rats. METHODS: In experiment 1, rats intrathecally received 15 microl saline or 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, or 1% bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, or dextrobupivacaine. The tail-flick and colorectal distension tests were performed to assess somatic and visceral antinociceptive effects, respectively, for 180 min after injection. In experiment 2, rats given 0.25% anesthetic solutions were evaluated with colorectal distension-induced response in blood pressure and heart rate. In experiment 3, four groups of rats received a 1-h infusion of saline or 2.5% bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, or dextrobupivacaine. Additional rats received either 1.25% bupivacaine or levobupivacaine for 1 h. Four days after infusion, animals were assessed for persistent sensory impairment using the tail-flick test. Spinal cords and nerve roots were obtained for histologic analysis. RESULTS: In experiment 1, the three drugs produced similar time course effects and dose-effect relations in tail-flick latency. Colorectal distension thresholds and motor paralysis were slightly lower and less apparent, respectively, at some concentrations in rats given levobupivacaine than in those given the other agents. In experiment 2, colorectal distension-induced response in heart rate was less depressed in rats given levobupivacaine than in those given the other anesthetics. In experiment 3, three groups of rats given 2.5% anesthetic solutions developed similar significant increases in tail-flick latency and incurred similar morphologic damage. Two groups of rats receiving 1.25% anesthetic solutions were similar in functional impairment and nerve injury scores. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that, when administered intrathecally in rats, bupivacaine and its R(+)- and S(-)-enantiomers are similar for somatic antinociception and neurotoxicity but slightly different in visceral antinociception and motor paralysis, in which levobupivacaine is less potent than the others.

The comparative neurotoxicity of intrathecal lidocaine and bupivacaine in rats.

UNLABELLED: There is a considerable difference in the number of reports of neurologic injury in the literature between lidocaine and other local anesthetics. Few in vivo animal studies have produced convincing results showing a difference in neurotoxicity among anesthetics. We investigated whether lidocaine and bupivacaine differ with respect to sensory impairment and histologic damage when equipotent doses of the two are administered intrathecally in rats. First, to determine relative anesthetic potency, rats intrathecally received 20 muL of saline, 0.625%, 1.25%, 2.5%, or 5% lidocaine, or 0.125%, 0.25%, 0.5%, or 1.0% bupivacaine, and were examined with the tail-flick test for 90 min. The potency ratio calculated was approximately 1:4.70 (95% confidence interval, 3.65-6.07) for lidocaine/bupivacaine. In the next experiment, 45 rats intrathecally received 20 muL of saline, 2.13% bupivacaine (approximately 1.5 mg/kg), or 10% lidocaine (approximately 6.9 mg/kg), and were examined for persistent functional impairment and morphologic damage. Rats given lidocaine developed significantly more prolonged tail-flick latencies than those in other groups 4 days after injection and incurred more morphologic damage than those given saline or bupivacaine. In conclusion, although the doses of anesthetics administered were larger than those used clinically, the present results suggest that bupivacaine is less neurotoxic than lidocaine when administered intrathecally at equipotent concentrations in the rat model. IMPLICATIONS: Bupivacaine induces less severe functional impairment and morphologic damage than lidocaine when the two anesthetics are intrathecally administered at equipotent concentrations in the rat.

The interaction between gamma-aminobutyric acid agonists and diltiazem in visceral antinociception in rats.

UNLABELLED: To examine whether the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists and L-type voltage-dependent calcium channel blockers potentiate each other on the visceral antinociceptive effects at the spinal cord, we assessed visceral nociception with colorectal distension (CD) test in rats with an intrathecal catheter. The measurements were performed after intrathecal administration of a GABA agonist (muscimol or baclofen), a calcium channel blocker (diltiazem), or the combination of the two. CD threshold did not change after muscimol 0.1 microg, baclofen 0.01 microg, or diltiazem 100 microg, but increased slightly after muscimol 1 microg and baclofen 0.1 microg. When muscimol 0.1 microg or 1 microg was administered with diltiazem, the increase in CD threshold was significantly larger than muscimol alone (at 5 min, 26.2% versus 0.6% MPE (maximum possible effect) or 84.5% versus 19.5%MPE, respectively; P < 0.01). The CD threshold after the combination of baclofen 0.1 microg and diltiazem also showed a significantly larger increase than that seen after baclofen alone (at 5 min, 48.0% versus 14.3% MPE; P < 0.01). Motor paralysis observed with muscimol 1 microg did not increase when muscimol was coadministered with diltiazem. In conclusion, intrathecal diltiazem in combination with a GABA agonist, muscimol or baclofen, potentiated the GABA agonists-induced visceral antinociception without increasing motor paralysis. IMPLICATIONS: Intrathecal administration of diltiazem in combination with a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonist, muscimol or baclofen, potentiated the GABA agonists-induced visceral antinociception but did not affect motor paralysis. The present results indicate that the coadministration of the two types of drugs may be clinically useful.

Comparative neurotoxicity of intrathecal and epidural lidocaine in rats.

BACKGROUND: Although there is a considerable difference in the number of clinical reports of neurologic injury between spinal anesthesia and other regional techniques, there are no animal data concerning a difference in the local anesthetic neurotoxicity between intrathecal and epidural administration. In the current study, the functional and morphologic effects of lidocaine administered intrathecally and epidurally were compared in rats. METHODS: Male rats were implanted with an intrathecal or epidural catheter through L4-L5 vertebra in the caudal direction. In experiment 1, to determine relative anesthetic potency, 16 rats received repetitive injections of 2.5% lidocaine into intrathecal or epidural space in different volumes and were examined for tail flick test for 90 min. In experiment 2, to ascertain whether the relative potency obtained in experiment 1 would apply to other concentrations of lidocaine, additional rats received saline, 1%, 2.5%, or 5% lidocaine in a volume of 20 or 100 microl through the intrathecal or epidural catheter, respectively. In experiment 3, additional rats that received saline, 2.5% lidocaine, or 10% lidocaine in a volume of 20 or 100 microl through the intrathecal or epidural catheter, respectively, were examined for persistent functional impairment and morphologic damage. RESULTS: In experiment 1, the two techniques produced parallel dose-effect curves that significantly differed from each other. The potency ratio calculated was approximately 4.72 (3.65-6.07):1 for intrathecal:epidural lidocaine. In experiment 2, every lidocaine solution produced a similar increase in tail flick latency for the two techniques. In experiment 3, five of eight rats given 10% intrathecal lidocaine incurred functional impairment 4 days after injection, whereas no rats in the other groups did. Significantly more morphologic damage was observed in rats given 10% intrathecal lidocaine than in those given 10% epidural lidocaine. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent functional impairment occurred only after intrathecal lidocaine. Histologic damage in the nerve roots and the spinal cord was less severe after epidural lidocaine than after intrathecal lidocaine. The current results substantiate the clinical impression that neurologic complications are less frequent after epidural anesthesia than after spinal anesthesia.