Energy utilization in lactating Jersey cows consuming a mixture of DDGS and straw replacing alfalfa hay.

Some forages require significant amounts of water to grow, causing the dairy industry to be dependent on a limited resource. Feeding crop residues and feed coproducts in dairy rations may represent opportunities when alfalfa is not readily available, and to reduce the industry's use of water. A study using indirect calorimetry and 12 multiparous lactating Jersey cows (BW = 447.5 ± 43.7 kg; DIM = 71 ± 11 d, mean ± SD) was conducted to determine the effect of feeding dried distillers grains and solubles (DDGS) and straw in replacement of alfalfa hay on milk production and energy utilization. A triplicated 4 × 4 Latin square design was used to evaluate the replacement of alfalfa hay with a coproduct mixture (COP) of wheat straw and DDGS. Animals were blocked by milk yield and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 experimental treatments including (proportions on a DM basis): a control diet (CON) containing 18.2% of alfalfa hay, a low-coproduct diet (LCOP) that contained 8.1% of COP, a medium-coproduct diet (MCOP) that contained 16.3% of COP, and a high-coproduct diet (HCOP) that contained 24.3% of COP. No differences were observed for daily dry matter intake or milk yield (mean ± SEM) 19.5 kg ± 0.60, 29.6 kg ± 0.91, respectively. A quadratic tendency was observed where increasing inclusion of COP up to 16.3% maintained ECM and milk fat yield but decreased when animals were fed 24.3% COP. Total methane production decreased linearly from 429.4 to 345.0 ± 22.8 L/d from CON to HCOP diets, respectively. The digestibility of CP increased linearly from 64.0 to 70.4 ± 0.95% and N balance increased linearly from 43.3 to 90.7 ± 15.0 g/d in animals consuming CON to HCOP diets. Total time spent ruminating was lowest in animals consuming the HCOP diet. A linear increasing tendency in digestible and metabolizable energy of 2.92 to 3.02 ± 0.041 Mcal/kg and 2.58 to 2.70 ± 0.047 Mcal/kg was observed in animals consuming CON to HCOP. The proportion ME from DE (ME/DE) tended to linearly increase from 88.3 to 89.4 ± 0.454 when COP was added to the diet. Results of this study indicate that alfalfa hay with a mixture of straw and DDGS can maintain milk production and DMI, but the partial or full replacement of alfalfa with the COP mixture may result in differences in energy utilization in part driven by effects on CH4 reduction.

Feed preference in lactating dairy cows for different pellet formulations.

Two taste preference experiments were conducted with the same 8 multiparous lactating Jersey cattle (100 ± 7.1 DIM, 30.5 ± 4 0.06 kg of milk yield, 18.8 ± 2.52 kg of DMI in experiment 1; and 215 ± 7.1 DIM, 27.6 ± 3.98 kg of milk yield, 19.6 ± 3.03 kg of DMI in experiment 2). In experiment 1, 4 pellets were formulated and manufactured into 4.0-mm pellets. These were as follows: 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, and 8.57% wheat middlings (ALFC); 72.3% corn grain, 18.5% wheat middlings, and 9.25% dried distillers grains and solubles (ENG); a pellet containing 100% dehydrated alfalfa meal (DALF); and a pellet containing a mixture of concentrate ingredients (GMIX; 43.1% corn grain, 26.3% dried distillers grains and solubles, 13.8% wheat middlings, 7.10% dry molasses, 3.18% soybean meal, 0.93% corn oil, and 5.6% minor constituents). Cows were offered 0.50 kg of pellets in a randomized arrangement within the feed bunk. Feed preference was ranked from 1 to 4 with 1 being the most preferred and 4 the least. The resulting preference rankings were averaged (± SE) resulting in a highest (closest to 1) to lowest (furthest from 1) ranking as follows of ALFC (1.38 ± 0.164), ENG (2.13 ± 0.327), GMIX (2.88 ± 0.375), and DALF (3.13 ± 0.350). The probabilities of first choice were 70.6 ± 0.55% ALFC, 16.5 ± 0.46% ENG, 5.50 ± 0.475% DALF, and 7.48 ± 0.455% GMIX. A Z-test was conducted to determine the percentage a treatment would be chosen first differed from the value of no preference at 25%; ALFC and DALF differed from the mean value, whereas no difference was observed for ENG and GMIX. The most preferred pellet (ALFC) was used in a second study and compared against 3 other treatments in which different flavoring agents were added. In this study, 4 pellets were manufactured with ALFC: 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, 6.76% wheat middlings, and 1.81% oregano leaf (ALFCO); 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, 8.22% wheat middlings, 0.10% melon flavoring, and 0.25% BitterOff (ALFCM); and 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, 8.47% wheat middlings, and 0.10% licorice flavoring (ALFCL). The resulting preference rankings were averaged resulting in a highest to lowest ranking as follows: ALFC (1.25 ± 0.164), ALFCO (2.38 ± 0.263), ALFCM (2.63 ± 0.375), and ALFCL (3.25 ± 0.164). The probabilities of first choice were 81.9 ± 0.65% ALFC, 8.49 ± 0.46% ALFCO, 6.50 ± 0.481% ALFCM, and 3.12 ± 0.491% ALFCL. Of the pellet choices, ALFC and ALFCL differed from the mean value of no choice, whereas no difference was observed for ALFCO and ALFCM. Mixtures of corn grain and dehydrated alfalfa meal bound by wheat middlings may serve as a feeding strategy that is preferred by the animals and may be an effective reward to cows entering an automated milk system, and we were unable to improve preference by adding flavoring agents.

The effect of replacing conventional alfalfa hay with lower-lignin alfalfa hay on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and energy utilization in lactating Jersey cows.

Lower-lignin (LoL) varieties of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) have been developed in recent years, and have the potential to positively impact animal performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of increasing the proportion of LoL alfalfa hay in diets fed to lactating dairy cows. Research plots were planted with a conventional variety (CON; Dairyland Hybriforce 3400), and 2 LoL varieties (LLG; 54HVX42 and LLB; Aflorex HiGest 460). After harvest, the LoL varieties were blended in equal proportions for feeding. Twelve multiparous Jersey cows (100 ± 4 d in milk) were used in a 3 × 3 Latin square with 3 periods of 28 d. Cows were assigned to 3 diets containing 0 (CNTRL), 16.1 (MdLL), and 32.2% (HiLL) of the diet DM as LoL alfalfa hay, which replaced CON. The CON alfalfa had average CP, NDF, and lignin contents (DM basis) of 20.5 ± 1.15, 42.1 ± 1.37, and 6.81 ± 0.57%, respectively, while the LoL alfalfa averaged 19.8 ± 0.75, 39.9 ± 1.56, and 6.07 ± 0.28%, respectively. No difference was observed in DMI (20.4 ± 0.61 kg/d). No difference in milk yield was observed, averaging 31.0 ± 1.02 kg/d across treatments. Similarly, no difference was observed in ECM yield (averaging 36.2 ± 1.43 kg/d). Feed conversion (ECM/DMI) tended to increase linearly with LoL alfalfa inclusion (1.74 to 1.80 ± 0.03). No difference was observed for milk fat yield and content (1.39 ± 0.075 kg/d and 4.51 ± 0.219%) or milk protein yield and content (1.06 ± 0.041 kg/d and 3.43 ± 0.096%). Total methane production quadratically decreased from CNTRL to MdLL then increased to HiLL (441, 389, 412 ± 18.2 L/d, respectively). No differences were observed on total-tract digestibility of DM (averaging 67.2 ± 0.55%) and NDF (averaging 50.9 ± 1.56%). No difference was observed in the concentration of DE, ME or NEL was observed averaging 2.82 ± 0.021, 2.51 ± 0.027, and 1.72 ± 0.030 Mcal/kg respectively. Our results suggest that replacing CON alfalfa with LoL alfalfa has no effects on milk production, milk composition, or nutrient digestibility but may improve feed efficiency.

Partitioning among-animal variance of energy utilization in lactating Jersey cows.

Animals vary in the way in which they utilize energy due to diet, genetics, and management. Energy consumed by the animal supports milk production, but considerable variation among-animals in energy utilization is thought to exist. The study objective was to estimate the among-animal variance in energy utilization in data collected from Jersey cows using indirect calorimetry. Individual animal-period data from 15 studies (n = 560) were used. The data set included 115 animals from 44 to 410 DIM producing 11.5 to 39.1 kg/d of milk. On average, the 63 treatments in the data set ranged 14.8 to 19.5% CP, 21.4 to 43.0% NDF, 16.2 to 33.3% starch, and 2.21 to 6.44% crude fat. Data were analyzed with the Glimmix procedure of SAS (9.4) with random effects of cow, treatment nested within period, square, and experiment. The percentage of among-animal, dietary treatment, and experimental variance was calculated as the variance associated with each fraction divided by the sum of variance from animal, dietary treatment, experiment, and residual which was considered the total variance. The percentage of among-animal variance was characterized as high or low when the value was greater than or less than the mean value of 29.2%. Among-animal variance explained approximately 29.3 - 42.5% of the total variance in DM intake (DMI), gross energy (GE), digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), and net energy of lactation (NEL) in Mcal/d. When energetic components of feces, urine, and heat in Mcal/d were expressed per unit of DMI the among-animal variance decreased by 20.4, 4.82, and 9.55% units, respectively. However, among-animal variance explained 4.80, 8.78, and 5.02% units more of the total variation for methane energy, lactation energy, and tissue energy in Mcal/d when expressed per unit of DMI. Variance in energetic efficiencies of DE/GE, ME/GE, and ME/DE were explained to a lesser extent by among-animal variance (averaging 17.8 ± 1.95%). The among-animal contribution to total variance in milk energy was 28.8%. Milk energy was a large proportion of the energy efficiency calculation which included milk energy plus corrected tissue energy over net energy intake which likely contributed to the 22.2% of total among-animal variance in energy efficiency. Results indicate that among-animal variance explains a large proportion of the total variation in DMI. This contributes to the variance observed for energy fractions as well as energy components when expressed in Mcal/d. Variation in energetic loss associated with methane was primarily explained by differences among-animals and was increased when expressed per unit of DMI highlighting the role of inherent animal differences in these losses.

Derivation of the maintenance energy requirements in Jersey cows differing in body condition score.

Research in a variety of species including cattle has suggested energy required for maintenance may be affected by body condition. The objective of this study was to use indirect calorimetry and total fecal and urine collections to estimate maintenance energy and fasting heat production (FHP) of cows differing in body condition score (BCS). Twelve multiparous nonpregnant and nonlactating Jersey cows were randomly assigned to one of 2 treatment groups. To construct these groups, cows were fed 2 different TMRs in a preexperimental period for 84 d resulting in a BCS of >5 (HiBCS) and a BCS <3 (LoBCS), and no difference was observed (P > 0.49) in initial body weight (BW) or BCS between treatments, averaging 509 ± 26.0 kg and 4.1 ± 0.23. To begin the experiment all animals were fed at maintenance (NELmaint, (Mcal/d) = 0.10 × BW0.75) for 24 d followed by 4 d of data collection for energy balance, cows were then fasted of 96 h with data collection for energy balance once again taken over the final 24 h. While during the maintenance collection period, differences in BW and BCS existed (439 and 566 ± 19.0 kg BW, and 3.0 and 5.0 ± 0.13 BCS) for LoBCS and HiBCS, respectively. Heat production increased with increasing BCS (13.1 to 16.2 ± 0.55 Mcal/d), but when expressed per unit of BW0.75 no difference was observed (0.14 ± 0.002 Mcal/d/ BW0.75). When fasted, body weight loss did not differ averaging 28.9 ± 0.181 kg. The FHP did not differ (P = 0.40) averaging 0.10 ± 0.004 Mcal/d/ BW0.75 and resulted in the following representation of maintenance; NELmaint, (Mcal/d = 0.10 ± 0.004 × BW0.75). During fasting the nitrogen free respiratory quotient tended to differ (0.69 and 0.73 ± 0.014) and O2 consumption and CO2 production for protein oxidation differed for LoBCS and HiBCS (5.44 and 2.35 ± 0.988 O2 and 4.52 and 1.95 ± 0.821 CO2 L/ BW0.75). Overall, FHP increased with increasing BCS, but FHP per unit of BW0.75 did not differ. Although BW change was similar during fasting, differences O2 consumption and CO2 production per unit of BW0.75 used for protein oxidation may indicate differences in the nature of body tissue utilization in cows differing in BCS.

Influence of empirically derived filtering parameters, ASV, and OTU pipelines on assessing rumen microbial diversity.

Microbes play an important role in human and animal health as well as animal productivity. The host microbial interactions within ruminants play a critical role in animal health and productivity and provide up to 70% of the animal's energy need in the form of fermentation products. As such, many studies have investigated microbial community composition to understand microbial community changes and factors that affect microbial colonization and persistence. The advances in next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies and low cost of sequencing have gravitated many studies to utilize 16S rDNA-based analysis tools for interrogation of microbiomes at a much finer scale than traditional culturing. However, such methods that rely on single base pair differences for bacterial taxa clustering may inflate or underestimate diversity leading to inaccurate identification of bacterial diversity. Therefore, in this study, we sequenced mock communities of known membership and abundance to establish filtration parameters to reduce inflation of microbial diversity due to PCR and sequencing errors. Additionally, we evaluated the effect of the resulting filtering parameters proposed using established bioinformatic pipelines on a study consisting of Holstein and Jersey cattle to identify bread and treatment effects on the bacterial community composition and the impact of the filtering on global microbial community structure analysis and results. Filtration resulted in a sharp reduction in bacterial taxa identified, yet retain most sequencing data (retaining > 79% of sequencing reads) when analyzed using 3 different microbial analysis pipelines (DADA2, Mothur, USEARCH). After filtration, conclusions from α and ß-diversity tests show very similar results across all analysis methods. The mock community-based filtering parameters proposed in this study help provide a more realistic estimation of bacterial diversity. Additionally, the filtration reduced the variation between microbiome analysis methods and help identify microbial community differences that could have been missed due to large animal to animal variation observed in the unfiltered data. As such, we believe, the new filtering parameters described in this study will help obtain diversity estimates closer to realistic values and will improve the ability of detecting microbial community differences and help better understand microbial community changes in 16S rDNA-based studies.

Effect of acid detergent lignin concentration for diets formulated to be similar in neutral detergent fiber content on energy utilization in lactating Jersey cows.

Lignin is a polyphenolic polymer that is an important factor in limiting fiber digestibility by ruminants. The objective of the current study was to evaluate lignin's effects on whole animal energy utilization in diets similar in NDF content. A low-lignin (LoLig) diet was formulated to contain 32.5% NDF (DM basis) and 9.59% lignin (NDF basis) and the high-lignin (HiLig) diet was formulated to contain 31.0% NDF (DM basis) and 13.3% lignin (NDF basis). These diets were randomly assigned and fed to 12 late-lactation (mean ± SD; 214 ± 14.9 DIM) multiparous Jersey cows (mean ± SD; 435 ± 13.9 kg) in a 2-period crossover design. Cows fed the LoLig treatment consumed more DM than cows on the HiLig diet (mean ± SD; 19.9 vs. 18.7 ± 0.645 kg/d) and the LoLig diet was concurrently of a greater gross energy concentration (mean ± SEM; 4.27 vs. 4.23 ± 0.03 Mcal/kg). As expected, increasing the concentration of lignin resulted in a reduction in total-tract NDF digestibility (45.5% vs. 40.4% ± 0.742%). Increasing lignin also resulted in a reduction in the digestibility of starch (97.7 vs. 96.3 ± 0.420) and CP (65.0 vs. 60.0 ± 0.829). Lignin also decreased the concentration of digestible energy (2.83 vs. 2.63 ± 0.04 Mcal/kg) and ME (2.52 vs. 2.36 ± 0.05 Mcal/kg), but the concentration of NEL was similar (1.81 vs. 1.75 ± 0.06 Mcal/kg). Increasing the concentration of lignin also reduced yields of ECM (33.7 vs. 30.0 ± 0.838 kg/d), milk protein (1.00 vs. 0.843 ± 0.027 kg/d), and milk fat (1.30 vs. 1.19 ± 0.058 kg/d). Decreasing the dietary lignin concentration did not affect daily methane emissions, averaging 391 ± 29.6 L/d. Results of this study indicate that feeding a diet greater in lignin decreases the digestibility of nutrients and provides less energy for production responses and that energy supplied from digestible NDF may be less than predicted by some nutrition models.

Appearance of choline metabolites in plasma and milk when choline is infused into the abomasum with or without methionine.

Four lactating, ruminally cannulated Jersey cows, (mean ± standard deviation) 264 ± 54.2 d in milk and 484 ± 24.1 kg of body weight, were arranged in a 4 × 4 Latin square design to measure the effects of abomasal infusion of choline chloride with or without dl-Met on milk and plasma choline metabolites and plasma AA in cows fed a Met-deficient diet. Cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 experimental treatments: (1) control; no supplemental Met or choline (CON), (2) 13 g/d of choline ion delivered via abomasal infusion (CHO), (3) 13 g/d of Met delivered via abomasal infusion (MET), and (4) 13 g/d of choline and 13 g/d of Met delivered via abomasal infusion (CHO + MET). Cows received the same basal diet throughout the experiment, which was formulated to be deficient in Met (-5.0 g of Met using the NASEM, 2021, model). Periods were 7 d in length with d 1 to 2 serving as a wash-out period and cows being infused on d 3 to 7. Milk samples were collected twice daily on d 5 to 7 and were analyzed for fat, true protein, lactose, and choline metabolites including betaine, phosphocholine, and free choline using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Blood samples were collected via venipuncture of the coccygeal vein at 1100, 1300, and 1500 h on d 7 of each period and were analyzed for free AA as well as choline metabolites. Plasma Met increased in response to Met infusion and an interaction with choline and Met infusion was observed in the plasma concentration of branched-chain AA. Cows receiving choline exhibited the greatest Cho yield in milk. Milk phosphocholine yield tended to be highest when both choline and Met were infused.

Energy and nitrogen utilization of lactating dairy cattle fed increasing inclusion of a high-protein processed corn coproduct.

Advancing technologies of the corn dry-milling ethanol production process includes the mechanical separation of fiber-containing particles from a portion of plant- and yeast-based nitrogenous particles. The resulting high-protein processed corn coproduct (HPCoP) contains approximately 52% crude protein (CP), 36% neutral detergent fiber (NDF), 6.4% total fatty acids (TFA). The objective of this experiment was to examine the effects of replacing nonenzymatically browned soybean meal with the HPCoP on dry matter intake (DMI), energy and N utilization, and milk production of lactating Jersey cows. Twelve multiparous Jersey cows were used in a triplicated 4 × 4 Latin square design consisting of four 28-d periods. Cows were blocked by milk yield and assigned randomly to 1 of 4 treatment diets that contained HPCoP (dry matter [DM] basis) at (1) 0%; (2) 2.6%; (3) 5.4%; and (4) 8.0%. Diets were formulated to be isonitrogenous and thus replace nonenzymatically browned soybean meal with HPCoP in the concentrate mix, while forage inclusion remained the same across diets. Increasing the concentration of HPCoP had no effect on DMI (mean ± SE; 19.9 ± 0.62 kg/d), but tended to linearly increase milk yield (27.8, 28.5, 29.8, and 29.0 ± 1.00 kg/d). Although no difference was observed in the concentration of milk protein with increasing inclusion of HPCoP (3.40% ± 0.057%), the concentration of fat linearly increased with the inclusion of HPCoP (5.05%, 5.19%, 5.15%, 5.47% ± 0.18%). No differences were observed in the digestibility of DM, NDF, CP, TFA, and gross energy averaging 66.6% ± 0.68%, 49.0% ± 1.03%, 66.1% ± 0.82%, 73.6% ± 1.73%, 66.3% ± 0.72%, respectively, with increasing HPCoP inclusion. The concentration of dietary gross energy linearly increased with increasing concentrations of HPCoP (4.25, 4.26, 4.28, and 4.31 ± 0.01 Mcal/kg), but no difference was observed in digestible energy and metabolizable energy (ME) across treatments averaging 2.83 ± 0.033 and 2.53 ± 0.043 Mcal/kg, respectively. Concentration of dietary net energy for lactation (NEL) tended to increase with increasing HPCoP (1.61, 1.72, 1.74, 1.72 ± 0.054 Mcal/kg) with the ratio of NEL:ME increasing linearly with increasing HPCoP inclusion (0.648, 0.676, 0.687, 0.677 ± 0.0124). Results of this study suggest that inclusion of the HPCoP can replace nonenzymatically browned soybean meal and support normal milk production.

Evaluation of gross energy concentration of neutral detergent fiber contained in feed and fecal samples.

Starch and NDF are usually assumed to contain the same concentration of gross energy (GE), but NDF is more variable in chemical composition and varies more in the extent of digestion. The variable chemical composition of NDF may have direct implications on dairy nutrition models that predict dietary GE and use this estimate for also predicting digestible energy. For example, when NDF is enriched in lignin and protein, the concentration of GE would increase, whereas NDF enriched in ash would have the opposite effect. Current nutritional models, such as the NASEM (2021) and CNCPS (6.55), assume a GE coefficient of 4.20 Mcal/kg for NDF. This study aimed to determine the heat of combustion of NDF and to consider if it is a contributing factor to the variance in digestible energy. To do so, NDF residues were isolated from 9 feed and 8 fecal samples and then combusted. Approximately 0.20 g of NDF residues from 16 feeds (corn silage, n = 2; grass hay, n = 2; alfalfa hay, n = 2; wheat straw, n = 1; cottonseed hulls, n = 1; soyhulls, n = 1; distillers dried grains with solubles, n = 1; and total mixed ration, n = 6) and 34 fecal samples were collected. A bomb calorimeter (Parr 6400 Calorimeter, Parr Instrument Company) was used to determine concentration of GE in each NDF residue sample. The GE concentration of feed NDF was observed to be 4.03 ± 0.245 Mcal/kg, which was similar to that of fecal NDF (3.94 ± 0.245 Mcal/kg). The lack of difference between feed and fecal NDF GE implies that digested NDF is of a similar GE concentration as total feed NDF and that current nutritional models are validated in their current approach in predicting digestible energy from NDF. However, our observed estimate of GE in NDF is lower than what is assumed and across feed types varied from 3.85 to 4.19 Mcal/kg.

Examining feed preference of different pellet formulations for application to automated milking systems.

Feed is often offered to a cow in the milking unit of an automated milking system. This offering provides nutrients but also acts as a reward to the cow for entering the unit. To complement the partial total mixed ration and to enable handling, flow, and delivery within this mechanized system, this offering is usually a mix of feeds that are combined and manufactured into a feed pellet. The objective of this experiment was to compare 4 different pelleting formulation strategies and measure the effects of feed preference in lactating Jersey cattle. To test the objective, a taste preference experiment was conducted with 8 multiparous lactating Jersey cattle (289 ± 25.3 d in milk, 26.0 ± 2.45 kg of milk yield, 19.36 ± 1.29 kg of dry matter intake). Four formulation strategies were tested including (1) a pellet containing feeds commonly included in the concentrate mixture of a total mixed ration, including 43.1% corn grain, 26.3% dried distillers grains, 3.18% soybean meal, and 5.6% vitamin and mineral premix (CMIX), (2) a pellet of dry corn gluten feed (CGF), (3) a pellet including feedstuffs that are considered to be highly palatable (53.2% wheat middling, 15.7% dried corn distillers grains and solubles, 15.2% cane molasses, and 1.81% oregano (FLVR), and (4) a high-energy pellet (ENG) consisting of 61% corn grain and 26.2% wheat middlings. Cows were offered 0.50 kg of each in a randomized arrangement within the feed bunk for 1 h or until the feed was fully consumed. According to the procedure, cows were offered all 4 treatments for the first 4 d, then the most preferred feed for each cow was removed, and the remaining 3 feeds were offered for 3 d. The process was repeated for the last 2 d. Feed preference was ranked from 1 to 4 with 1 being the most preferred and 4 the least. The resulting preference ranking was CGF (1.25 ± 0.463), FLVR (2.5 ± 0.926), CMIX (2.88 ± 0.835), and ENG (3.13 ± 0.991). These results were subsequently examined utilizing the Plackett-Luce analysis to examine the probability animals would choose a given pellet first based on the current data set. The analysis determined probabilities of first choice as 78.6 ± 0.601% CGF, 9.38 ± 0.438% FLVR, 4.94 ± 0.453% ENG, and 7.11 ± 0.439% CMIX. A Z-test was also conducted to determine if the percentage a treatment will be chosen first differed from the mean value of no preference at 25%. Corn gluten feed and ENG differed from the mean value while no difference was observed for FLVR and CMIX. Results suggest that animals exhibit a high degree of preference for CGF pellets and that this preference is greater than pellets containing other feed ingredients. Alternatively, cows appeared to exhibit the lowest preference for a high-energy pellet containing mostly corn and wheat middlings.

Comparison of methods to estimate ruminal degradation and intestinal digestibility of protein in hydrolyzed feather meal with or without blood.

Hydrolyzed feather meal (HFM) is a feedstuff high in rumen undegraded protein (RUP) that can be used as an effective source of metabolizable protein for dairy cattle. Because the production process may vary, the rumen degradability and intestinal digestibility of HFM may also vary. Additionally, some processes may incorporate additional blood into the final product to result in feather meal with poultry blood. To determine the rumen degradability and intestinal digestibility of these products, several laboratory assays can be used; the common assays are the mobile bag (MOB), modified three-step (MTS), and Ross (ROS) assays. Although all 3 assays determine RUP digestibility, they vary in whether they are performed in situ, in vitro, or both. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of HFM originating from processes that differ in their inclusion of blood, and to compare the MOB, MTS, and ROS assays. Ten samples of HFM, which were identified by the suppliers as HFM with little blood (n = 5) and with more blood (n = 5), were spot-sampled, collected from 10 production plants across the United States, and subjected to all 3 assays. Assay type had an effect on RUP, total-tract crude protein (CP) digestibility, and the amount of RUP digested. A significant effect was observed on RDP and RUP concentrations for blood inclusion; no effect was detected for total-tract CP digestibility. We found no difference in RUP digestibility for assay or blood inclusion. There was also no interaction of the effect of assay or blood inclusion. Results suggest that even though there are differences in chemical composition in HFM associated with the inclusion of blood, such as ash and crude fat, few if any differences are observed in intestinal digestion of protein. Although the assays varied in their estimates of rumen undegraded protein, MOB and MTS yielded the most similar values. However, all 3 assays resulted in similar estimates of RUP digestibility.

Estimates of daily oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide and methane emissions, and heat production for beef and dairy cattle using spot gas sampling.

A simulation study was conducted to examine accuracy of estimating daily O2 consumption, CO2 and CH4 emissions, and heat production (HP) using a spot sampling technique and to determine optimal spot sampling frequency (FQ). Data were obtained from 3 experiments where daily O2 consumption, emissions of CO2 and CH4, and HP were measured using indirect calorimetry (respiration chamber or headbox system). Experiment 1 used 8 beef heifers (ad libitum feeding; gaseous exchanges measured every 30 min over 3 d in respiration chambers); Experiment 2 used 56 lactating Holstein-Friesian cows (restricted feeding; gaseous exchanges measured every 12 min over 3 d in respiration chambers); Experiment 3 used 12 lactating Jersey cows (ad libitum feeding; gaseous exchanges measured every hour for 1 d using headbox style chambers). Within experiment, averages of all measurements (FQALL) and averages of measurements selected at time points with 12, 8, 6, or 4 spot sampling FQ (i.e., sampling every 2, 3, 4, and 6 h in a 24-h cycle, respectively; FQ12, FQ8, FQ6, and FQ4, respectively) were compared. Within study a mixed model was used to compare gaseous exchanges and HP among FQALL, FQ12, FQ8, FQ6, and FQ4, and an interaction of dietary treatment by FQ was examined. A regression model was used to evaluate accuracy of spot sampling within study [i.e., FQALL (observed) vs. FQ12, FQ8, FQ6, or FQ4 (estimated)]. No interaction of diet by FQ was observed for any variables except for CH4 production in experiment 1. No FQ effect was observed for gaseous exchanges and HP except in experiment 2 where CO2 production was less (5,411 vs. 5,563 L/d) for FQ4 compared with FQALL, FQ12, and FQ8. A regression analysis between FQALL and each FQ within study showed that slopes and intercepts became farther from 1 and 0, respectively, for almost all variables as FQ decreased. Most variables for FQ12 and FQ8 had root mean square prediction error (RMSPE) less than 10% of the mean and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) greater than 0.80, and RMSPE increased and CCC decreased as FQ decreased. When a regression analysis was conducted with combined data from the 3 experiments (mixed model with study as a random effect), results agreed with those from the analysis for the individual studies. Prediction errors increased and CCC decreased as FQ decreased. Generally, all the estimates from FQ12, FQ8, FQ6, and FQ4 had RMSPE less than 10% of the means and CCC greater than 0.90 except for FQ6 and FQ4 for O2 consumption and CH4 production. In conclusion, the spot sampling simulation with 3 indirect calorimetry experiments indicated that FQ of at least 8 samples (every 3 h in a 24-h cycle) was required to estimate daily O2 consumption, CO2 and CH4 production, and HP and to detect changes in those in response to dietary treatments. This sampling FQ may be considered when using techniques that measure spot gas exchanges such as the GreenFeed and face mask systems.

Dietary fatty acid and starch content and supplemental lysine supply affect energy and nitrogen utilization in lactating Jersey cows.

The effects of dietary fatty acid (FA) and starch content as well as supplemental digestible Lys (sdLys) on production, energy utilization, and N utilization were evaluated. Each factor was fed at 5 different amounts, and factor limits were as follows: 3.0 to 6.2% of dry matter (DM) for FA; 20.2 to 31.3% of DM for starch, and 0 to 17.8 g/d of sdLys. Dietary FA and starch were increased by replacing soyhulls with supplemental fat and corn grain, respectively, and sdLys increased with rumen-protected Lys. Fifteen unique treatments were fed to 25 Jersey cows (mean ± SD; 80 ± 14 d in milk) across 3 blocks in a partially balanced incomplete block design. Each block consisted of 4 periods of 28 d, where the final 4 d were used to determine milk production and composition, feed intake, energy utilization (via total collection and headbox-style indirect calorimetry), and N utilization (via total collection). Response surface models were used to evaluate treatment responses. Increasing dietary FA decreased DM intake and milk protein yield. When dietary starch was less than 24%, milk protein concentration increased with increasing sdLys, but when dietary starch was greater than 26% milk protein concentration decreased with increasing sdLys. Digestibility of FA increased when dietary FA increased from 3.0 to 4.2% and decreased as FA increased beyond 4.2%. Although neutral detergent fiber digestibility decreased as dietary starch increased, energy digestibility increased. As dietary FA increased, metabolizable energy (ME) content quadratically increased. Supply of ME increased as dietary FA increased from 3.0 to 4.2% and decreased as FA increased beyond 4.2%. Increasing dietary FA and starch decreased CH4 production and urinary energy. Increasing dietary starch increased the efficiency of utilizing dietary N for milk N. Increasing sdLys quadratically decreased N balance as sdLys increased from 0 to 8 g/d and increased N balance as sdLys increased from 8 to 18 g/d. Increasing dietary FA can increase ME content, however, at high dietary FA, decreased DM intake and FA digestibility resulted in a plateau in ME content and a decrease in ME supply. Our results demonstrate that sdLys supply is important for milk protein when dietary starch is low, and some Lys may be preferentially used for muscle protein synthesis at the expense of milk protein when sdLys is high.

Derivation of the maintenance energy requirements and efficiency of metabolizable energy utilization for dry and lactating Jersey cows.

Maintenance energy is the energy required to conserve the state of an animal when no work is completed. Dietary energy must be supplied to meet maintenance requirements before milk can be produced. The objectives of the current experiment were to quantify the maintenance energy requirement of Jersey cows when lactating or dry. Energetic measures were collected on 8 Jersey cows and evaluated across 3 physiological phases and nutritional planes: lactation, dry cows fed at maintenance, and fasted dry cows. Through total collection of feces and urine as well as using headbox-style indirect calorimeters, energy balance and heat production data were measured across all phases. Lactation data were collected across four 28-d periods. Data for cows fed at maintenance were collected after 14 d and fasting heat production was measured during the last 24 h of a 96-h fast. Net energy for maintenance (NEM) requirements, and the efficiency of converting metabolizable energy (ME) into net energy were compared between lactating and dry (maintenance or fasting phase) cows. Heat production of dry cows fed at maintenance, which represents ME for maintenance, was 0.146 ± 0.0087 Mcal per unit of metabolic body weight (BW0.75, MBW). Fasting heat production, which represents NEM, was 0.102 ± 0.0071 Mcal/MBW. Energy balance was calculated as tissue energy plus milk energy. When estimated via regressing energy balance on ME intake, NEM was not different between dry and lactating cows (0.120 ± 0.32 vs. 0.103 ± 0.0052 Mcal/MBW). However, the slope of the regression of energy balance on ME intake was greater for dry compared with lactating cows (0.714 ± 0.046 vs. 0.685 ± 0.010) when evaluated with a fixed intercept. This suggests that dry cows were more efficient at converting ME into net energy and that the efficiency of utilizing ME for maintenance may be greater than for lactation. Our measurements of NEM and the slope of ME on energy balance were greater than the value used by the National Research Council (2001), which are 0.080 Mcal/MBW for NEM and approximately 0.64 for the slope. Results of this study suggest that NEM and the efficiency of converting ME into NEM of modern lactating Jersey cows are similar to recent measurements on modern Holstein cows and greater than previous measurements.

Effect of feeding hydrolyzed feather meal and rumen-protected lysine on milk protein and energy utilization in late-lactation Jersey cows.

Hydrolyzed feather meal (HFM) is a feed that is high in rumen undegradable protein; however, it is low in Lys compared with other high rumen undegradable protein sources. Additionally, processing methods differ by facility, which affects AA composition and protein digestibility. The objective of this study was to use lactating dairy cows to determine the effects of feeding 2 sources of HFM that differed by the amount of blood they contained and also to study the effects of supplementing rumen-protected (RP) Lys when these sources of HFM are fed. In this study, 12 multiparous Jersey cows were enrolled in a triplicated 4 × 4 Latin square with 4 periods 28 d in length. Cows were fed 2 total mixed rations that differed by source of HFM. The HFM was included at 4.5% of the diet dry matter, and one source was produced with the addition of poultry blood. Cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment sequences. Treatments were as follows: HFM without added blood and no RP-Lys, HFM with added blood and no RP-Lys, HFM without blood and with RP-Lys (22 g of digestible Lys), and HFM with added blood and RP-Lys. The source of HFM containing blood tended to increase dry matter intake (18.3 vs. 17.3 ± 0.72 kg/d), and increased milk yield (20.5 vs. 18.4 ± 1.31 kg/d) and protein yield (0.788 vs. 0.694 ± 0.040 kg/d). The inclusion of RP-Lys did not affect milk or protein yield. In cows fed HFM containing blood, plasma concentration of Lys (82.1 vs. 70.8 ± 4.06 µM) and His (27.8 vs. 17.9 ± 3.15 µM) was higher. The addition of RP-Lys had no effect on the concentration of either plasma Lys or His. Gross energy intake tended to increase for HFM containing more blood (81.4 vs. 77.3 ± 3.29 Mcal/d); however, no difference was observed for intake of digestible energy (52.0 ± 2.20 Mcal/d) or metabolizable energy (46.4 ± 2.02 Mcal/d). Similar to dry matter intake, N intake increased with the inclusion of HFM containing blood, but crude protein digestibility decreased (61.6 vs. 66.0%). Results of this study highlight that source of HFM can be a factor that affects milk production and that this in part is due to differences in the profile of AA. Additionally, the observation that plasma His and milk protein increased with the consumption of HFM containing more blood suggests that His may have played a role in increasing milk and milk protein yield.

Predicting ruminally undegraded and microbial protein flows from the rumen.

The objectives of the present work were (1) to identify the cause of the linear bias in predictions of rumen-undegradable protein (RUP) content of feeds, and devise methods to remove the bias from prediction equations, and (2) to further explore the impact of rumen-degradable protein (RDP) on microbial N (MiN) outflow from the rumen. The kinetic model used by NRC (2001), which is based on protein fractionation and rates of degradation (Kd) and passage (Kp), displays considerable slope bias (-0.30 kg/kg), indicating parameter or structural problems. Regressing Kp by feed class and a static adjustment factor for the in situ-derived Kd on observed RUP flows completely resolved the slope bias problem, and the model performed significantly better than models using unadjusted Kd and marker-based Kp. The Kd adjustment was 3.82%/h, which represents approximately a 50% increase in rates of degradation over the in situ values, indicating that in situ analyses severely underestimate true rates of protein degradation. The Kp for concentrate-derived protein was 5.83%/h, which was slightly less than the marker-predicted rate of 6.69%/h. However, the derived forage protein rate was 0.49%/h, which was considerably less than the marker-based rate of 5.07%/h. Compartmental analysis of data from a single study corroborated the regression analysis, indicating that a 25% reduction in the overall passage rate and an 87% increase in the rate of degradation were required to align ruminal N pool sizes and the extent of protein degradation with the observed data. Therefore, one must conclude that both the in situ-derived degradation rates and the marker-based particle passage rates are biased relative to protein passage and cannot be used directly to predict RUP outflow from the rumen. The effects of RDP supply on microbial nitrogen (MiN) flow were apparent when intakes of individual nutrients were offered but not when DM intake and individual nutrient concentrations were offered, due to collinearity problems. Microbial N flow from the rumen was found to be linearly related to ruminally degraded starch, ruminally degraded neutral detergent fiber (NDF), RDP, and forage NDF intakes; and quadratically related to residual OM intake. More complicated models containing 2- and 3-way interactions among nutrients were also supported by the data. Independent MiN responses to RDP, ruminally degraded starch, and ruminally degraded NDF aligned with the expected responses to each of those nutrients. Nonlinear representations of MiN were found to be inferior to the linear models. Despite using unbiased predictions of RUP and MiN as drivers of AA flows, predictions of Arg, His, Ile, and Lys flow exhibited linear slope bias relative to the observed data, indicating that representations of the AA composition of the proteins may be biased or the observed data are biased. This is an improvement over the NRC (2001) predictions, where bias adjustments were required for all of the essential AA. Despite the bias for 4 AA flows, the revised prediction system was a substantial improvement over the prior work.