Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 165
Filtrar
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 148: 77-86, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38554807

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is a common cause of healthcare-associated infection (PA-HAI) in the intensive care unit (ICU). AIM: To describe the epidemiology of PA-HAI in ICUs in Ontario, Canada, and to identify episodes of sink-to-patient PA transmission. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of patients in six ICUs from 2018 to 2019, with retrieval of PA clinical isolates, and PA-screening of antimicrobial-resistant organism surveillance rectal swabs, and of sink drain, air, and faucet samples. All PA isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing. PA-HAI was defined using US National Healthcare Safety Network criteria. ICU-acquired PA was defined as PA isolated from specimens obtained ≥48 h after ICU admission in those with prior negative rectal swabs. Sink-to-patient PA transmission was defined as ICU-acquired PA with close genomic relationship to isolate(s) previously recovered from sinks in a room/bedspace occupied 3-14 days prior to collection date of the relevant patient specimen. FINDINGS: Over ten months, 72 PA-HAIs occurred among 60/4263 admissions. The rate of PA-HAI was 2.40 per 1000 patient-ICU-days; higher in patients who were PA-colonized on admission. PA-HAI was associated with longer stay (median: 26 vs 3 days uninfected; P < 0.001) and contributed to death in 22/60 cases (36.7%). Fifty-eight admissions with ICU-acquired PA were identified, contributing 35/72 (48.6%) PA-HAIs. Four patients with five PA-HAIs (6.9%) had closely related isolates previously recovered from their room/bedspace sinks. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of PA causing HAI appeared to be acquired in ICUs, and 7% of PA-HAIs were associated with sink-to-patient transmission. Sinks may be an under-recognized reservoir for HAIs.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/clasificación , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/transmisión , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Ontario/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Anciano , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma
2.
Vaccine ; 42(3): 535-540, 2024 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38199921

RESUMEN

MVA-BN is an orthopoxvirus vaccine that provides protection against both smallpox and mpox. In June 2022, Canada launched a publicly-funded vaccination campaign to offer MVA-BN to at-risk populations including men who have sex with men (MSM) and sex workers. The safety of MVA-BN has not been assessed in this context. To address this, the Canadian National Vaccine Safety Network (CANVAS) conducted prospective safety surveillance during public health vaccination campaigns in Toronto, Ontario and in Vancouver, British Columbia. Vaccinated participants received a survey 7 and 30 days after each MVA-BN dose to elicit adverse health events. Unvaccinated individuals from a concurrent vaccine safety project evaluating COVID-19 vaccine safety were used as controls. Vaccinated and unvaccinated participants that reported a medically attended visit on their 7-day survey were interviewed. Vaccinated participants and unvaccinated controls were matched 1:1 based on age group, gender, sex and provincial study site. Overall, 1,173 vaccinated participants completed a 7-day survey, of whom 75 % (n = 878) also completed a 30-day survey. Mild to moderate injection site pain was reported by 60 % of vaccinated participants. Among vaccinated participants 8.4 % were HIV positive and when compared to HIV negative vaccinated individuals, local injection sites were less frequent in those with HIV (48 % vs 61 %, p = 0.021), but health events preventing work/school or requiring medical assessment were more frequent (7.1 % vs 3.1 %, p = 0.040). Health events interfering with work/school, or requiring medical assessment were less common in the vaccinated group than controls (3.3 % vs. 7.1 %, p < 0.010). No participants were hospitalized within 7 or 30 days of vaccination. No cases of severe neurological disease, skin disease, or myocarditis were identified. Our results demonstrate that the MVA-BN vaccine appears safe when used for mpox prevention, with a low frequency of severe adverse events and no hospitalizations observed.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Mpox , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Vacuna contra Viruela , Humanos , Masculino , Colombia Británica , Homosexualidad Masculina , Inmunización , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Vacuna contra Viruela/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacunas Atenuadas
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 106(4): 820-827, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32916210

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital drains may be an important reservoir for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE). AIM: To determine prevalence of CPE in hospital drains exposed to inpatients with CPE, relatedness of drain and patient CPE, and risk factors for drain contamination. METHODS: Sink and shower drains in patient rooms and communal shower rooms exposed to 310 inpatients with CPE colonization/infection were cultured at 10 hospitals. Using short- and long-read whole-genome sequencing, inpatient and corresponding drain CPE were compared. Risk factors for drain contamination were assessed using multi-level modelling. FINDINGS: Of 1209 exposed patient room and communal shower room drains, 53 (4%) yielded 62 CPE isolates in seven (70%) hospitals. Of 49 CPE isolates in patient room drains, four (8%) were linked to prior room occupants. Linked drain/room occupant pairs included Citrobacter freundii ST18 isolates separated by eight single nucleotide variants (SNVs), related blaKPC-containing IncN3-type plasmids (different species), related blaKPC-3-containing IncN-type plasmids (different species), and related blaOXA-48-containing IncL/M-type plasmids (different species). In one hospital, drain isolates from eight rooms on two units were Enterobacter hormaechei separated by 0-6 SNVs. Shower drains were more likely to be CPE-contaminated than hand hygiene (odds ratio: 3.45; 95% confidence interval: 1.66-7.16) or patient-use (13.0; 4.29-39.1) sink drains. Hand hygiene sink drains were more likely to be CPE-contaminated than patient-use sink drains (3.75; 1.17-12.0). CONCLUSION: Drain contamination was uncommon but widely dispersed. Drain CPE unrelated to patient exposure suggests contamination by undetected colonized patients or retrograde (drain-to-drain) contamination. Drain types had different contamination risks.


Asunto(s)
Enterobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Contaminación de Equipos , Hospitales , Habitaciones de Pacientes , Abastecimiento de Agua , Proteínas Bacterianas , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/prevención & control , Humanos , Ontario , beta-Lactamasas
4.
J Hosp Infect ; 106(3): 454-464, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32898614

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Decades of studies document an association between Gammaproteobacteria in sink drains and hospital-acquired infections, but the evidence for causality is unclear. AIM: We aimed to develop a tool to assess the quality of evidence for causality in research studies that implicate sink drains as reservoirs for hospital-acquired Gammaproteobacterial infections. METHODS: We used a modified Delphi process with recruited experts in hospital epidemiology to develop this tool from a pre-existing causal assessment application. FINDINGS: Through four rounds of feedback and revision we developed the 'Modified CADDIS Tool for Causality Assessment of Sink Drains as a Reservoir for Hospital-Acquired Gammaproteobacterial Infection or Colonization'. In tests of tool application to published literature during development, mean percent agreement ranged from 46.7% to 87.5%, and the Gwet's AC1 statistic (adjusting for chance agreement) ranged from 0.13 to 1.0 (median 68.1). Areas of disagreement were felt to result from lack of a priori knowledge of causal pathways from sink drains to patients and uncertain influence of co-interventions to prevent organism acquisition. Modifications were made until consensus was achieved that further iterations would not improve the tool. When the tool was applied to 44 articles by two independent reviewers in an ongoing systematic review, percent agreement ranged from 93% to 98%, and the Gwet's AC1 statistic was 0.91-0.97. CONCLUSION: The modified causality tool was useful for evaluating studies that implicate sink drains as reservoirs for hospital-acquired infections and may help guide the conduct and reporting of future research.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Reservorios de Enfermedades/microbiología , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Equipos y Suministros de Hospitales/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Programas Informáticos , Causalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Contaminación de Equipos/estadística & datos numéricos , Gammaproteobacteria , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/transmisión , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos
5.
J Hosp Infect ; 104(4): 513-521, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31954763

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Viral respiratory illnesses are common causes of outbreaks and can be fatal to some patients. AIM: To investigate the association between laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections and potential sources of exposure during the previous 7 days. METHODS: In this nested case-control analysis, healthcare personnel from nine Canadian hospitals who developed acute respiratory illnesses during the winters of 2010/11-2013/14 submitted swabs that were tested for viral pathogens. Associated illness diaries and the weekly diaries of non-ill participants provided information on contact with people displaying symptoms of acute respiratory illness in the previous week. Conditional logistic regression assessed the association between cases, who were matched by study week and site with controls with no respiratory symptoms. FINDINGS: There were 814 laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory illnesses. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of a viral illness was higher for healthcare personnel reporting exposures to ill household members [7.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.4-9.1], co-workers (3.4, 95% CI 2.4-4.7) or other social contacts (5.1, 95% CI 3.6-7.1). Exposures to patients with respiratory illness were not associated with infection (aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.2); however, healthcare personnel with direct patient contact did have higher odds (aOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6). The aORs for exposure and for direct patient contact were similar for illnesses caused by influenza. CONCLUSION: Community and co-worker contacts are important sources of viral respiratory illness in healthcare personnel, while exposure to patients with recognized respiratory infections is not associated. The comparatively low risk associated with direct patient contact may reflect transmission related to asymptomatic patients or unrecognized infections.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/virología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Virosis/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
6.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(5): 503-506, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31924389

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alcohol based hand rubs (ABHR) are extremely effective at reducing microbial contamination and have an essential role in best practice hand hygiene described by the World Health Organization. METHODS: We determined ABHR drying time when performing hand hygiene in a laboratory setting. Which was followed by identifying the amount of ABHR needed for complete hand coverage. When the aforementioned was analyzed real-time data were gathered to examine the amount used for hand hygiene in a hospital setting. In parallel hands of healthcare workers (HCWs) were monitored for drying time and perception on ABHR use. RESULTS: In 86% (24,446,397/28,280,383) of the events a single dose of ABHR was used on clinical wards. Twenty-four HCWs expected hand hygiene to take 7.5 seconds (median; range 3-30 seconds). Forty-three HCWs show that 1.5 mL ABHR dose achieves the desired drying time according to World Health Organization guidelines (av. median 26 seconds), but is consistently perceived to have a longer drying time than expected (av. median 18 seconds). In-vivo results (n = 10) indicate that 2.25 mL ABHR is required for adequate coverage (82%-90%) of both sides of the hand. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that set standards for the use of ABHR do not match "in-vivo" behaviour of HCWs. Perceived drying times are shorter than actual drying time. The needed drying time to reach acceptable antimicrobial efficacy of ABHRs should be revisited.


Asunto(s)
Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Desinfectantes para las Manos/administración & dosificación , Factores de Tiempo , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Etanol/administración & dosificación , Adhesión a Directriz , Mano/microbiología , Desinfección de las Manos/normas , Desinfectantes para las Manos/química , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Med Microbiol ; 69(2): 256-264, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31264957

RESUMEN

Background. The Serious Outcomes Surveillance Network of the Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN SOS) has been performing active influenza surveillance since 2009 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01517191). Influenza A and B viruses are identified and characterized using real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and multiplex testing has been performed on a subset of patients to identify other respiratory virus aetiologies. Since both methods can identify influenza A and B, a direct comparison was performed.Methods. Validated real-time RT-PCRs from the World Health Organization (WHO) to identify influenza A and B viruses, characterize influenza A viruses into the H1N1 or H3N2 subtypes and describe influenza B viruses belonging to the Yamagata or Victoria lineages. In a subset of patients, the Seeplex RV15 One-Step ACE Detection assay (RV15) kit was also used for the detection of other respiratory viruses.Results. In total, 1111 nasopharyngeal swabs were tested by RV15 and real-time RT-PCRs for influenza A and B identification and characterization. For influenza A, RV15 showed 98.0 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity and 99.7 % accuracy. The performance characteristics of RV15 were similar for influenza A subtypes H1N1 and H3N2. For influenza B, RV15 had 99.2 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity and 99.8 % accuracy, with similar assay performance being shown for both the Yamagata and Victoria lineages.Conclusions. Overall, the detection of circulating subtypes of influenza A and lineages of influenza B by RV15 was similar to detection by real-time RT-PCR. Multiplex testing with RV15 allows for a more comprehensive respiratory virus surveillance in hospitalized adults, without significantly compromising the reliability of influenza A or B virus detection.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Virus de la Influenza B/aislamiento & purificación , Gripe Humana/virología , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex/métodos , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Virus de la Influenza A/clasificación , Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Virus de la Influenza B/clasificación , Virus de la Influenza B/genética , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
8.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 25(2): 217-224, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29783025

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare immunogenicity, reactogenicity and acceptability of high- and standard-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (HDTIV, SDTIV) in 18- to 64-year-olds. METHODS: We randomized 18- to 64-year-olds to HDTIV or SDTIV in two consecutive years. We collected serum on days 0 and 21, measured haemagglutination inhibition geometric mean titres (GMT) and compared seroconversion, day 21 titres, seroprotection, reactogenicity and acceptability. RESULTS: Immunogenicity was evaluable in 42 of 47 2014 participants, all 33 both-year participants and 87 of 90 2015-only participants. First-dose HDTIV recipients experienced seroconversion more frequently than SDTIV recipients to A(H3N2) in 2014 (13/21, 62% vs. 4/21, 19%, p 0.01) and to all vaccine strains in 2015: (A(H1N1): 24/42, 57% vs. 15/59, 25%; A(H3N2): 42/42, 100% vs. 47/59, 80%; B: 25/42, 60% vs. 13/59, 22%; all p <0.01). Day 21 haemagglutination inhibition GMT were higher in first and two sequential-year HDTIV vs. SDTIV recipients: A(H1N1): GMT 749 and 768 vs. 384 (p <0.0001, p 0.002); A(H3N2): 1238 and 956 vs. 633 (p 0.0003, p 0.1); and B: 1113 and 1086 vs. 556 (p 0.0005, p 0.02). HDTIV was more reactogenic (local pain score 3 vs. 1 of 10 on day 0/1, p 0.0003), but recipients were equally willing to be revaccinated (HDTIV: 76/83 (92%); SDTIV: 76/80 (95%), p 0.54). The ratios of day 21 GMT in SDTIV recipients vaccinated in 0 to 4 prior years to those in SDTIV and HDTIV recipients vaccinated in 15 or more prior years were A(H1N1): 3.73 and 1.38; A(H3N2) 3.07 and 1.16; and B: 2.01 and 1.21. CONCLUSIONS: HDTIV is more immunogenic and reactogenic and as acceptable as SDTIV in 18- to 64-year-olds.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta Inmunológica , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Adulto Joven
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 69(6): 970-979, 2019 08 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30508064

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated the possibility of negative associations between prior influenza vaccines and subsequent influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE), depending on season and strain. We investigated this association over 4 consecutive influenza seasons (2011-2012 through 2014-2015) in Canada. METHODS: Using a matched test-negative design, laboratory-confirmed influenza cases and matched test-negative controls admitted to hospitals were enrolled. Patients were stratified into 4 groups according to influenza vaccine history (not vaccinated current and prior season [referent], vaccinated prior season only, vaccinated current season only, and vaccinated both current and prior season). Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate VE; prior vaccine impact was assessed each season for overall effect and effect stratified by age (<65 years, ≥65 years) and type/subtype (A/H1N1, A/H3N2, influenza B). RESULTS: Overall, mainly nonsignificant associations were observed. Trends of nonsignificant decreased VE among patients repeatedly vaccinated in both prior and current season relative to the current season only were observed in the A/H3N2-dominant seasons of 2012-2013 and 2014-2015. Conversely, in 2011-2012, during which B viruses circulated, and in 2013-2014, when A/H1N1 circulated, being vaccinated in both seasons tended to result in a high VE in the current season against the dominant circulating subtype. CONCLUSIONS: Prior vaccine impact on subsequent VE among Canadian inpatients was mainly nonsignificant. Even in circumstances where we observed a trend of negative impact, being repeatedly vaccinated was still more effective than not receiving the current season's vaccine. These findings favor continuation of annual influenza vaccination recommendations, particularly in older adults. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01517191.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Estaciones del Año , Vacunación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Virus de la Influenza B/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Factores de Riesgo
10.
J Hosp Infect ; 99(4): 419-421, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29432819

RESUMEN

Antibiograms of urine cultures are being used to guide empiric treatment for urinary tract infections (UTIs). However, roughly 50% of urine cultures are from patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU). It is unclear whether Enterobacteriaceae in ABU patients have similar resistance patterns as UTI patients. Hence, we aimed to compare the antimicrobial resistance patterns in patients with ABU to patients with symptomatic UTI. We found no major differences in resistance patterns, and therefore empiric treatment choices can be guided by antibiograms that include ABU patients.


Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Orina/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad
11.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 29: 39-44, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28341129

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Infectious complications related to neuraxial anesthesia may result in adverse outcomes. There are no best practice guidelines regarding hand-sanitizing measures specifically for these procedures. The objective of this study was to compare the growth of microbial organisms on the operator's forearm between five common techniques of hand washing for labor epidurals. METHODS: In this single blind randomized controlled trial, all anesthesiologists performing labor epidurals in a tertiary care hospital were randomized into five study groups: hand washing with alcohol gel only up to elbows (Group A); hand washing with soap up to elbows, sterile towel to dry, followed by alcohol gel (Group B); hand washing with soap up to elbows, non-sterile towel to dry, followed by alcohol gel (Group C); hand washing with soap up to elbows, non-sterile towel to dry (Group D) or hand washing with soap up to elbows, sterile towel to dry (Group E). The number of colonies for each specimen/rate per 100 specimens on one or both arms per group was measured. RESULTS: The incidence of colonization was 2.5, 23.0, 18.5, 114.5, and 53.0 in Groups A, B, C, D and E, respectively. Compared to Group A, the odds ratio of bacterial growth for Group B was 1.52 (P=0.519), Group C 5.44 (P=0.003), Group D 13.82 (P<0.001), and Group E 8.65 (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Alcohol-based antiseptic solutions are superior in terms of reducing the incidence of colonization. The results will enable us to develop guidelines to standardize and improve hand-sanitizing practices among epidural practitioners.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural , Anestesia Obstétrica , Antiinfecciosos Locales , Carga Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Anestesiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Etanol , Femenino , Antebrazo/microbiología , Geles , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Método Simple Ciego , Jabones
12.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 36(6): 1047-1055, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28078557

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of screening all hospital inpatients for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) at the time of hospital admission, compared to not screening, from a US hospital perspective. We used a linked transmission/Markov model to compare outcomes for a typical hospitalized medical patient, from a community with a colonization prevalence of 0.05%. Outcomes were number of colonized patients, CPE-related clinical infections and deaths, expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), cost, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effect of parameter uncertainty, using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. Screening prevented six CPE colonization cases per 1000 patients (1/1000 colonized with screening, 7/1000 without screening), over half of all symptomatic CPE infections (2/10,000 symptomatic with screening, 5/10,000 symptomatic without screening), and nearly half of all CPE-related deaths (8/100,000 deaths with screening, 15/100,000 deaths without screening). Screening accrued 0.0009 additional QALYs and cost an additional $24.68, compared to not screening, and was cost-effective (ICER $26,283 per QALY gained). Our results were sensitive to uncertainty in prevalence and the number of secondary colonizations per colonized patient. Screening was not cost-effective at a prevalence below 0.015% or if transmission to fewer than 0.9 new patients occurred for each colonized patient. At prevalence levels above 0.3%, screening was cost-saving compared to not screening. Screening inpatients for CPE carriage is likely cost-effective, and may be cost-saving, depending on the local prevalence of carriage.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economía , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/aislamiento & purificación , Portador Sano/diagnóstico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/economía , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Portador Sano/microbiología , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Hospitales , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos
13.
Epidemiol Infect ; 144(4): 741-50, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26384310

RESUMEN

To identify predictive factors and mortality of patients with influenza admitted to intensive care units (ICU) we carried out a prospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza in adult ICUs in a network of Canadian hospitals between 2006 and 2012. There were 626 influenza-positive patients admitted to ICUs over the six influenza seasons, representing 17·9% of hospitalized influenza patients, 3·1/10,000 hospital admissions. Variability occurred in admission rate and proportion of hospital influenza patients who were admitted to ICUs (proportion range by year: 11·7-29·4%; 21·3% in the 2009-2010 pandemic). In logistic regression models ICU patients were younger during the pandemic and post-pandemic period, and more likely to be obese than hospital non-ICU patients. Influenza B accounted for 14·2% of all ICU cases and had a similar ICU admission rate as influenza A. Influenza-related mortality was 17·8% in ICU patients compared to 2·0% in non-ICU patients.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/virología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
14.
J Clin Microbiol ; 53(12): 3951-3, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26424845

RESUMEN

Vancomycin-variable enterococcus (VVE) is an emerging pathogen. VVE isolates initially appear phenotypically susceptible to vancomycin but possesses the vanA gene and can develop in vitro and in vivo resistance to vancomycin. We report a case of VVE bacteremia and describe how VVE poses diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Vancomicina/farmacología , Anciano , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Ligasas de Carbono-Oxígeno/genética , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Enterococcus/clasificación , Enterococcus/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Tipificación Molecular
16.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 21(6): 553-9, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25677630

RESUMEN

A national point-prevalence survey for infection or colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was done in Canadian hospitals in 2010. A follow-up survey was done in November 2012 to determine whether there were any changes in the prevalence of these organisms; we also determined the prevalence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CREs). Associations between prevalence and infection prevention and control policies were evaluated in logistic regression models. A total of 143 (67% of eligible facilities) hospitals with 29 042 adult inpatients participated in the survey, with representation from all 10 provinces; 132 hospitals participated in 2010 and 2012. There were no significant changes in the median prevalence of MRSA in 2010 (4.3%) compared to 2012 (3.9%), or of CDI in 2010 (0.8%) compared to 2012 (0.9%). A higher median prevalence of VRE was identified in 2012 (1.3%) compared to 2010 (0.5%) (p 0.04), despite decreased VRE screening in 2012. The median prevalence of ESBLs was 0.7% and was 0 for CREs; CREs were reported from only 10 hospitals (7.0%). A policy of routinely caring for patients with MRSA or VRE in a private isolation room was associated with lower prevalence of these organisms. Targeted screening of high-risk patients at admission was associated with lower MRSA prevalence; better hand hygiene compliance was associated with lower VRE prevalence. These data provide national prevalence rates for antibiotic-resistant organisms among adults hospitalized in Canadian hospitals. Certain infection prevention and control policies were associated with prevalence.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Portador Sano/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Bacterias Grampositivas/aislamiento & purificación , Hospitales , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Adulto Joven
17.
Euro Surveill ; 19(9)2014 Mar 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24626207

RESUMEN

During the 2013/14 influenza season in Canada, 631 of 654 hospitalisations for laboratory-confirmed influenza enrolled in sentinel hospitals were due to Influenza A. Of the 375 with known subtype, influenza A(H1N1) accounted for 357. Interim unmatched vaccine effectiveness adjusted for age and presence of one or more medical comorbidities was determined by test-negative case-control design to be 58.5% (90% confidence interval (CI): 43.9-69.3%) overall and 57.9% (90% CI: 37.7-71.5) for confirmed influenza A(H1N1).


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Vigilancia de Guardia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/virología , Laboratorios , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estaciones del Año , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven
18.
Epidemiol Infect ; 140(4): 633-42, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21733246

RESUMEN

To determine whether drinking water contaminated with antimicrobial-resistant E. coli is associated with the carriage of resistant E. coli, selected households sending water samples to Ontario and Alberta laboratories in 2005-2006 were asked to participate in a cross-sectional study. Household members aged ≥12 years were asked to complete a questionnaire and to submit a rectal swab. In 878 individuals, 41% carried a resistant strain of E. coli and 28% carried a multidrug-resistant strain. The risk of carriage of resistant E. coli was 1·26 times higher for users of water contaminated with resistant E. coli. Other risk factors included international travel [prevalence ratio (PR) 1·33], having a child in nappies (PR 1·33), being male (PR 1·33), and frequent handling of raw red meats (PR 1·10). Protecting private water sources (e.g. by improving systems to test and treat them) may help slow the emergence of antimicrobial resistance in E. coli.


Asunto(s)
Agua Potable/microbiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/transmisión , Escherichia coli , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alberta/epidemiología , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/etiología , Composición Familiar , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Adulto Joven
19.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 31(4): 591-7, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21796343

RESUMEN

We aimed to assess the immunogenicity of a single half-dose of AS03-adjuvanted monovalent 2009 pandemic H1N1 vaccine in healthy adults. Healthy subjects age 20-60 years were prospectively enrolled in a cohort receiving intramuscular administration of a single half-dose (1.875 µg of hemagglutinin [HA]) of adjuvanted 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine. Data from participants enrolled in a concomitant study of immunogenicity following a full-dose (3.75 µg of HA) are presented concurrently. Sera for assessment of hemagglutination-inhibiting (HAI) antibody to the vaccine strain were obtained before and 14 or 21 days after vaccination. Ninety-seven participants received a half-dose and 50 received a full-dose of vaccine. In the half-dose cohort, Food and Drug Administration criteria for immunogenicity regarding seroprotection and seroconversion rates were met for subjects aged 20-45 years, but not for those aged 46-60 years. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of individuals achieving a post-vaccination HAI titre of ≥1:40, the geometric mean titres of post-vaccination antibody, or the proportion of individuals with a four-fold or greater increase in antibody levels between the two cohorts. Participants 46-60 years of age were significantly less likely to be seroprotected at day 21 than those 20-45 years old in both cohorts. Immunogenicity of a half dose of adjuvanted pH1N1 influenza vaccine was adequate in subjects aged 20-45 years. Dose reduction is a possible strategy for expanding the availability in the event of vaccine shortage in this age group.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Pruebas de Inhibición de Hemaglutinación , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
20.
Vaccine ; 29(10): 1921-8, 2011 Feb 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21219987

RESUMEN

A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial of a nasally administered inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine formulated with partially purified meningococcal outer membrane proteins (OMP-TIV) was conducted in 1349 healthy adults aged 18-64 years. Subjects received either vaccine containing 15 µg of haemagglutinin (HA) of each of three influenza strains for the 2003-2004 season on days 0 and 14, or 30 µg on day 0 and saline placebo on day 14, or placebo on days 0 and 14. Vaccination was well tolerated, with similar reactogenicity as placebo. Compared to placebo, statistically significant increases in mean serum haemagglutinin inhibition reciprocal titers and salivary secretory IgA to all 3 antigens were seen on day 28 for both vaccine dose groups. The incidence of culture-positive influenza and fever >37.8°C and cough and one or more of sore throat, runny nose or nasal congestion, muscle or joint ache, headache, fatigue, or chills or culture positive influenza and at least two of these symptoms was low (16/1349; 1.2%). In the intent-to-immunize population too few febrile culture-confirmed illness events (n=4) occurred to perform analysis. Fever occurred infrequently, even in the presence of positive cultures and disabling multi-symptom disease. In participants receiving all doses of either vaccine regimen the incidence of culture-confirmed influenza with respiratory symptoms and with or without fever was 0.77% (7/904) vs. 2.03% (9/443) in placebo recipients (p=0.045, Fisher's exact test; relative risk reduction 62%), despite circulation of a drift variant A/H3N2 that was poorly matched to vaccine. An OMP-TIV vaccine was well tolerated and reduced risk of symptomatic culture confirmed influenza. Vaccine efficacy will need to be validated in a season with a higher attack rate.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Proteínas de la Membrana Bacteriana Externa/administración & dosificación , Proteínas de la Membrana Bacteriana Externa/aislamiento & purificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Pruebas de Inhibición de Hemaglutinación , Humanos , Inmunidad Mucosa , Inmunización Secundaria/métodos , Inmunoglobulina A Secretora/análisis , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neisseria meningitidis/química , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Saliva/inmunología , Factores de Tiempo , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/efectos adversos , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA