Sumario de las recomendaciones y puntos clave del Consenso de las Sociedades Científicas Españolas (SEPAR, SEMICYUC, SEMES; SECIP, SENeo, SEDAR, SENP) para la utilización de la ventilación no invasiva y terapia de alto flujo con cánulas nasales en el paciente adulto, pediátrico y neonatal con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda grave / Summary of recommendations and key points of the consensus of Spanish scientific societies (SEPAR, SEMICYUC, SEMES; SECIP, SENEO, SEDAR, SENP) on the use of non-invasive ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannulas in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with severe acute respiratory failure

El soporte respiratorio no invasivo (SRNI) comprende 2 modalidades de tratamiento, la ventilación mecá-nica no invasiva (VMNI) y la terapia de alto flujo con cánulas nasales (TAFCN) que se aplican en pacientes adultos, pediátricos y neonatales con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda (IRA). Sin embargo, el grado de acuerdo entre las distintas especialidades sobre el beneficio de estas técnicas en diferentes escenarios clínicos es controvertido. El objetivo del presente consenso fue elaborar una serie de recomendaciones de buena práctica clínica para la aplicación de soporte no invasivo en pacientes con IRA, avaladas por todas las sociedades científicas involucradas en el manejo del paciente adulto y pediátrico/neonatal con IRA. Para ello se contactó con las diferentes sociedades implicadas, quienes designaron a su vez a un grupo de 26 profesionales con suficiente experiencia en su aplicación. Se realizaron 3 reuniones presenciales para consensuar las recomendaciones (hasta un total de 71) fundamentadas en la revisión de la literatura y en la actualización de la evidencia disponible en relación con 3 categorías: indicaciones, monitorización yseguimiento del SRNI. Finalmente, se procedió a votación telemática de cada una de las recomendaciones, por parte de los expertos de cada sociedad científica implicada. Para la clasificación del grado de acuerdo se optó por un sistema analógico de clasificación fácil e intuitivo de usar, y que expresara con claridad si el procedimiento relacionado con el SRNI debía hacerse, podía hacerse o no debía hacerse. (AU)

Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied. (AU)

Summary of recommendations and key points of the consensus of Spanish scientific societies (SEPAR, SEMICYUC, SEMES; SECIP, SENEO, SEDAR, SENP) on the use of non-invasive ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannulas in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with severe acute respiratory failure.

Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied.

Summary of recommendations and key points of the consensus of Spanish scientific societies (SEPAR, SEMICYUC, SEMES; SECIP, SENEO, SEDAR, SENP) on the use of non-invasive ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannulas in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with severe acute respiratory failure. / Sumario de las recomendaciones y puntos clave del Consenso de las Sociedades Científicas Españolas (SEPAR, SEMICYUC, SEMES; SECIP, SENeo, SEDAR, SENP) para la utilización de la ventilación no invasiva y terapia de alto flujo con cánulas nasales en el paciente adulto, pediátrico y neonatal con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda grave.

Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied.

La ecografía pulmonar como herramienta para guiar la surfactación en neonatos prematuros / Lung ultrasound as a tool to guide the administration of surfactant in premature neonates

OBJETIVOS: El objetivo del presente estudio es la valoración mediante la ecografía pulmonar de la profundidad del tubo endotraqueal (TET) durante el procedimiento de Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation (INSURE). MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: La profundidad de inserción del TET se calculó mediante el peso del neonato (profundidad de inserción [cm] = peso [kg]+5,5). Después de la intubación, la profundidad del TET fue valorada por 2 neonatólogos independientes mediante la auscultación bilateral y la ecografía pulmonar. RESULTADOS: Doce neonatos con membrana hialina fueron reclutados. En 2 casos la ecografía pulmonar ayudó a posicionar correctamente el TET. Todos los pacientes presentaron una buena evolución con una radiografía y una ecografía pulmonar normal al alta. CONCLUSIONES: La ecografía pulmonar es una técnica segura y no invasiva útil en situaciones donde la radiografía de tórax no se usa habitualmente, siendo además rápida y libre de radiación

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the usefulness of lung ultrasound (LUS) to estimate the endotracheal tube (ETT) depth position during the Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation (INSURE) procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ETT insertion depth was estimated using the weight (insertion depth (cm)=weight (kg)+5.5). After intubation two independent neonatologists using bilateral auscultation or LUS checked the ETT depth. RESULTS: Twelve newborns with respiratory distress syndrome were included. In two cases LUS helped to correctly replace the ETT. All the patients progressed well, with normal x-ray and LUS before discharge. CONCLUSIONS: LUS appears to be a safe and non-invasive technique and is useful in clinical situations were x-ray is not routinely performed, as it is fast and radiation free

[Lung ultrasound as a tool to guide the administration of surfactant in premature neonates]. / La ecografía pulmonar como herramienta para guiar la surfactación en neonatos prematuros.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to assess the usefulness of lung ultrasound (LUS) to estimate the endotracheal tube (ETT) depth position during the Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation (INSURE) procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ETT insertion depth was estimated using the weight (insertion depth (cm)=weight (kg)+5.5). After intubation two independent neonatologists using bilateral auscultation or LUS checked the ETT depth. RESULTS: Twelve newborns with respiratory distress syndrome were included. In two cases LUS helped to correctly replace the ETT. All the patients progressed well, with normal x-ray and LUS before discharge. CONCLUSIONS: LUS appears to be a safe and non-invasive technique and is useful in clinical situations were x-ray is not routinely performed, as it is fast and radiation free.

Recomendaciones para la asistencia respiratoria en el recién nacido (III). Surfactante y óxido nítrico / Recommendations for respiratory support in the newborn (III). Surfactant and nitric oxide

Las recomendaciones incluidas en este documento forman parte de una revisión actualizada de la asistencia respiratoria en el recién nacido. Están estructuradas en 12 módulos y en este trabajo se presenta el módulo 7. El contenido de cada módulo es el resultado del consenso de los miembros del Grupo Respiratorio y Surfactante de la Sociedad Española de Neonatología. Representan una síntesis de los trabajos publicados y de la experiencia clínica de cada uno de los miembros del grupo (AU)

The recommendations included in this document will be part a series of updated reviews of the literature on respiratory support in the newborn infant. These recommendations are structured into twelve modules, and in this work module 7 is presented. Each module is the result of a consensus process including all members of the Surfactant and Respiratory Group of the Spanish Society of Neonatology. They represent a summary of the published papers on each specific topic, and of the clinical experience of each one of the members of the group (AU)

[Recommendations for respiratory support in the newborn (iii). Surfactant and nitric oxide]. / Recomendaciones para la asistencia respiratoria en el recién nacido (iii). Surfactante y óxido nítrico.

The recommendations included in this document will be part a series of updated reviews of the literature on respiratory support in the newborn infant. These recommendations are structured into twelve modules, and in this work module 7 is presented. Each module is the result of a consensus process including all members of the Surfactant and Respiratory Group of the Spanish Society of Neonatology. They represent a summary of the published papers on each specific topic, and of the clinical experience of each one of the members of the group.

Displasia broncopulmonar: definiciones y clasificación / Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: definitions and classifications

La displasia broncopulmonar sigue siendo la secuela más frecuente relacionada con los recién nacidos de muy bajo peso al nacer y especialmente con aquellos con pesos extremadamente bajos. Pese a los avances en la prevención y los cuidados de la insuficiencia respiratoria asociada a la prematuridad, no ha ocurrido un descenso en su incidencia en esta población, aunque sí hemos asistido en los últimos años a un cambio en su expresión clínica y en su gravedad. Existen, sin embargo, diferencias aún importantes entre los distintos centros en cuanto a la frecuencia de su presentación, probablemente debido a la aplicación de un diagnóstico clínico no homogéneo. En este artículo, la Comisión de Estándares de la Sociedad Española de Neonatología quiere revisar los criterios diagnósticos de la displasia broncopulmonar para reducir, en la medida de lo posible, la variabilidad intercentro de la misma (AU)

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia is the most common sequelae related to very low birth weight infants, mostly with those of extremely low birth weight. Even with advances in prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome associated with prematurity, there is still no decrease in the incidence in this population, although a change in its clinical expression and severity has been observed. There are, however, differences in its frequency between health centres, probably due to a non-homogeneously used clinical definition. In this article, the Committee of Standards of the Spanish Society of Neonatology wishes to review the current diagnosis criteria of bronchopulmonary dysplasia to reduce, as much as possible, these intercentre differences (AU)

Recomendaciones sobre transporte neonatal / Recommendations for neonatal transport

Las gestaciones que conllevan algún riesgo materno y/o fetal no siempre son diagnosticadas en un centro especializado en la atención neonatal, por lo que el transporte posnatal es una parte esencial dentro de la estructura de los servicios sanitarios perinatales. El objetivo del transporte neonatal es trasladar al recién nacido a un centro especializado que disponga de la infraestructura y la experiencia necesarias para su asesoramiento y tratamiento. El transporte ideal del recién nacido es el que se realiza in utero. Desafortunadamente, no todos los problemas pueden detectarse a tiempo para el traslado materno y hasta un 30-50% de ellos pueden presentarse durante el parto o en el periodo neonatal inmediato. Por ello es necesario disponer de conocimientos y medios para la reanimación y la estabilización del recién nacido en el momento del parto y de un sistema de transporte neonatal especializado que permita trasladar a los pacientes con el mismo nivel de cuidados que recibiría en el hospital receptor sin que suponga en ningún caso un deterioro de su salud o un riesgo elevado para ella. La Sociedad Española de Neonatología, a través de su Comisión de Estándares, ha querido revisar y actualizar en este documento las recomendaciones para el transporte intraútero, las indicaciones para el traslado neonatal, la organización y la logística necesarias para realizarlo (personal, comunicación, documentación, medio de transporte y equipamiento), la estabilización previa al mismo, el manejo durante el traslado y el ingreso en el hospital receptor (AU)

During pregnancy, it is not always possible to identify maternal or foetal risk factors. Infants requiring specialised medical care are not always born in centres providing intensive care and will need to be transferred to a referral centre where intensive care can be provided. Therefore Neonatal Transport needs to be considered as part of the organisation of perinatal health care. The aim of Neonatal Transport is to transfer a newborn infant requiring intensive care to a centre where specialised resources and experience can be provided for the appropriate assessment and continuing treatment of a sick newborn infant. Intrauterine transfer is the ideal mode of transport when the birth of an infant with risk factors is diagnosed. Unfortunately, not all problems can be detected in advance with enough time to safely transfer a pregnant woman. Around 30- 50% of risk factors will be diagnosed during labour or soon after birth. Therefore, it is important to have the knowledge and resources to resuscitate and stabilise a newborn infant, as well as a specialised neonatal transport system. With this specialised transport it is possible to transfer newly born infants with the same level of care that they would receive if they had been born in a referral hospital, without increasing their risks or affecting the wellbeing of the newborn. The Standards Committee of the Spanish Society of Neonatology reviewed and updated recommendations for intrauterine transport and indications for neonatal transfer. They also reviewed organisational and logistic factors involved with performing neonatal transport. The Committee review included the type of personnel who should be involved; communication between referral and receiving hospitals; documentation; mode of transport; equipment to stabilise newly born infants; management during transfer, and admission at the referral hospital (AU)

Niveles asistenciales y recomendaciones de mínimos para la atención neonatal / Health care levels and minimum recommendations for neonatal care

En el año 2004 fue elaborado por el Comité de Estándares y la Junta Directiva de la Sociedad Española de Neonatología (SEN) un primer documento sobre niveles asistenciales y recomendaciones de mínimos para la atención neonatal, a partir del cual se pudo definir el nivel asistencial de cada centro en nuestro país, así como los requerimientos técnico-sanitarios según niveles. La presente revisión pretende tener en cuenta los cambios experimentados en la asistencia neonatal en los últimos años y optimizar la localización de recursos. Las unidades que proporcionan asistencia a los recién nacidos deben estar organizadas dentro de un sistema de regionalización de los cuidados perinatales. Las características funcionales de cada nivel asistencial deben ser definidas de forma uniforme y clara, y esto incluye requerimientos de equipamiento, instalaciones, personal, servicios de apoyo, formación y organización de servicios (incluyendo el transporte) necesarios para cubrir las prestaciones de cada nivel de cuidados (AU)

A policy statement on the levels of care and minimum recommendations for neonatal healthcare was first proposed by the Standards Committee and the Board of the Spanish Society of Neonatology in 2004. This allowed us to define the level of care of each center in our country, as well as the health and technical requirements by levels of care to be defined. This review takes into account changes in neonatal care in the last few years and to optimize the location of resources. Facilities that provide care for newborn infants should be organized within a regionalized system of perinatal care. The functional capabilities of each level of care should be defined clearly and uniformly, including requirements for equipment, facilities, personnel, ancillary services, training, and the organization of services (including transport) needed to cover each level of care (AU)

[Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: definitions and classifications]. / Displasia broncopulmonar: definiciones y clasificación.

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia is the most common sequelae related to very low birth weight infants, mostly with those of extremely low birth weight. Even with advances in prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome associated with prematurity, there is still no decrease in the incidence in this population, although a change in its clinical expression and severity has been observed. There are, however, differences in its frequency between health centres, probably due to a non-homogeneously used clinical definition. In this article, the Committee of Standards of the Spanish Society of Neonatology wishes to review the current diagnosis criteria of bronchopulmonary dysplasia to reduce, as much as possible, these inter-centre differences.

[Recommendations for neonatal transport]. / Recomendaciones sobre transporte neonatal.

During pregnancy, it is not always possible to identify maternal or foetal risk factors. Infants requiring specialised medical care are not always born in centres providing intensive care and will need to be transferred to a referral centre where intensive care can be provided. Therefore Neonatal Transport needs to be considered as part of the organisation of perinatal health care. The aim of Neonatal Transport is to transfer a newborn infant requiring intensive care to a centre where specialised resources and experience can be provided for the appropriate assessment and continuing treatment of a sick newborn infant. Intrauterine transfer is the ideal mode of transport when the birth of an infant with risk factors is diagnosed. Unfortunately, not all problems can be detected in advance with enough time to safely transfer a pregnant woman. Around 30- 50% of risk factors will be diagnosed during labour or soon after birth. Therefore, it is important to have the knowledge and resources to resuscitate and stabilise a newborn infant, as well as a specialised neonatal transport system. With this specialised transport it is possible to transfer newly born infants with the same level of care that they would receive if they had been born in a referral hospital, without increasing their risks or affecting the wellbeing of the newborn. The Standards Committee of the Spanish Society of Neonatology reviewed and updated recommendations for intrauterine transport and indications for neonatal transfer. They also reviewed organisational and logistic factors involved with performing neonatal transport. The Committee review included the type of personnel who should be involved; communication between referral and receiving hospitals; documentation; mode of transport; equipment to stabilise newly born infants; management during transfer, and admission at the referral hospital.

[Health care levels and minimum recommendations for neonatal care]. / Niveles asistenciales y recomendaciones de mínimos para la atención neonatal.

A policy statement on the levels of care and minimum recommendations for neonatal healthcare was first proposed by the Standards Committee and the Board of the Spanish Society of Neonatology in 2004. This allowed us to define the level of care of each center in our country, as well as the health and technical requirements by levels of care to be defined. This review takes into account changes in neonatal care in the last few years and to optimize the location of resources. Facilities that provide care for newborn infants should be organized within a regionalized system of perinatal care. The functional capabilities of each level of care should be defined clearly and uniformly, including requirements for equipment, facilities, personnel, ancillary services, training, and the organization of services (including transport) needed to cover each level of care.

[Neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: 9 years of experience]. / Oxigenación por membrana extracorpórea neonatal: 9 años de experiencia.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a rescue therapy for reversible respiratory or cardiac diseases. Neonatal pathologies requiring this technique are different from the ones found later in life. OBJECTIVES: To review the main causes requiring ECMO in the neonatal period, to compare the clinical course depending on the initial illness and to identify the sequelae attributable to this technique. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective review of clinical records of all neonatal patients that received ECMO support in our centre. RESULTS: 45 neonatal ECMO were performed in our unit between January 2001 and June 2009. Forty techniques were due to respiratory failure, 2 secondary to haemodynamic shock and 3 secondary to sepsis. Veno-venous cannulation was used initially in 24 patients (53.3%). The length of technique varied depending on the underlying disease. Patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia were in ECMO for longer periods. The overall survival to the technique was 86.3% (38/44 patients), also with differences among diseases. Extracorporeal support was withdrawn in 4 children because of a diagnosis of an irreversible pathology and one because of massive brain haemorrhage. No serious adverse outcomes attributable to the technique were found among survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Survival among newborns supported with ECMO in our hospital is similar to that recorded by the ELSO in 2004, although we use veno-venous cannulation in more than a half of the patients. The percentage of moderate to severely impaired neurodevelopmental outcome among survivors after this technique was low.

[Respiratory care in neonatal intensive care units. Situation in the year 2005]. / Asistencia respiratoria en las unidades de cuidados intensivos neonatales en España: situación en 2005.

AIM: To learn the characteristic of the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) that offer neonatal respiratory assistance in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A structured survey was developed and sent to all Spanish neonatal units to learn about the respiratory care offered in 2005. RESULTS: A total of 96 Units answered the survey, with an estimated representatively of 63%, with a range from 3 to 92%, depending on the geographical area. Level IIIc Units were in the upper range. Answer the survey 26 units type IIb (27%), 16 IIIa (17%), 40 IIIb (42%) and 14 IIIc (14%). The total number of level III NICU beds was 541 (1.2 beds per 1000 livebirths; range, 0.7-1.7). The mean number of beds per NICU was 4.1 in level IIIa Units, 2.8 in those IIIb and 14.6 in type IIIc NICUs. In level III NICUs, the bed per physician ratio was 2.4 and that of beds per registered nurse was 2.8 (2.2 in level IIIc NICUs). There were a total 13,219 admissions, 54% of those needed mechanical ventilation (36% in IIIa and 65% in level IIIc NICUs). Oxygen blenders for resuscitation at birth were available in 42% of level IIIb and IIIc NICUs. NICUs had one neonatal ventilator per bed, and 63% of units had high frequency ventilation available. All units had nasal-CPAP systems, 25% of level IIIa Units, 58% IIIb and 64% of those type IIIc had systems for nasal ventilation. All level IIIc and 93% of level IIIb NICUs were able to provide inhaled nitric oxygen therapy. Four NICUS offered ECMO. CONCLUSIONS: The mean number of NICU beds per 1000 livebirths is within the lower limits of those been recommended, and there were wide variations among different geographical areas. A 54% of those babies admitted to NICUs required mechanical ventilation. The mean number of NICU beds per registered nurse was 2.8. There was an adequate number of neonatal ventilators (one per bed) and 63% were able to provide HFV. All NICUs hand n-CPAP systems.

Asistencia respiratoria en las unidades de cuidados intensivos neonatales en España: situación en 2005 / Respiratory care in neonatal intensive care units. Situation in the year 2005

Objetivo: conocer el tipo de unidades de cuidados intensivos neonatales (UCIN) que proporcionan asistencia respiratoria neonatal en España y sus características. Material y método: encuesta multicéntrica estructurada para conocer la actividad asistencial respiratoria prestada por las UCIN en 2005. Resultados: contestaron 96 unidades neonatales con una representatividad estimada en un 63%, con un intervalo entre el 3 y el 92%, según las áreas geográficas; las unidades IIIc se encuentran en el rango superior. Contestaron la encuesta 26 unidades tipo IIb (27%), 16 IIIa (17%), 40 IIIb (42%) y 14 IIIc (14%). Las camas totales de intensivos de nivel III fue de 541 (1,2 camas cada 1.000 recién nacidos vivos; intervalo, 0,7-1,7). La media de camas por unidad fue de 4,1 para las IIIa, 2,8 para las IIIb y 14,6 para las IIIc. En las unidades de nivel III, la relación camas/médicos fue de 2,4 camas/medico y la de camas/enfermeras 2,8 camas/enfermera (2,2 en nivel IIIc). Hubo un total de 13.219 ingresos, de los que el 54% precisó ventilación (el 36% en las IIIa y el 65% en las IIIc). La posibilidad de reanimación en el paritorio con mezcla de gases (aire y oxígeno) sólo la tiene el 42% de las IIIb y IIIc. La relación respirador/cama fue de 1/1; el 63% puede proporcionar ventilación de alta frecuencia (VAF). Todas disponen de sistemas de presión positiva continua nasal (CPAP-n). Sistemas para aplicar ventilación nasal intermitente están disponibles en el 25% de las IIIa, el 58% de las IIIb y el 64% de las IIIc. Todas las IIIc y el 93% de las IIIb pueden proporcionar oxido nítrico inhalado. Cuatro unidades disponían de ECMO. Conclusiones: la media de camas de UCIN de nivel III cada mil nacidos está en el límite bajo de lo recomendable, con notables diferencias regionales. La necesidad de ventilación mecánica fue del 54%. La relación de camas por enfermera fue de 2,8. Existe una buena dotación de respiradores (1 por cama) con alta disponibilidad de VAF (63%). Todas las unidades disponen de CPAP-n (AU)

Aim: To learn the characteristic of the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) that offer neonatal respiratory assistance in Spain. Material and method: A structured survey was developed and sent to all Spanish neonatal units to learn about the respiratory care offered in 2005. Results: A total of 96 Units answered the survey, with an estimated representatively of 63%, with a range from 3 to 92%, depending on the geographical area. Level IIIc Units were in the upper range. Answer the survey 26 units type IIb (27%), 16 IIIa (17%), 40 IIIb (42%) and 14 IIIc (14%). The total number of level III NICU beds was 541 (1.2 beds per 1000 livebirths; range, 0.7–1.7). The mean number of beds per NICU was 4.1 in level IIIa Units, 2.8 in those IIIb and 14.6 in type IIIc NICUs. In level III NICUs, the bed per physician ratio was 2.4 and that of beds per registered nurse was 2.8 (2.2 in level IIIc NICUs). There were a total 13,219 admissions, 54% of those needed mechanical ventilation (36% in IIIa and 65% in level IIIc NICUs). Oxygen blenders for resuscitation at birth were available in 42% of level IIIb and IIIc NICUs. NICUs had one neonatal ventilator per bed, and 63% of units had high frequency ventilation available. All units had nasal-CPAP systems, 25% of level IIIa Units, 58% IIIb and 64% of those type IIIc had systems for nasal ventilation. All level IIIc and 93% of level IIIb NICUs were able to provide inhaled nitric oxygen therapy. Four NICUS offered ECMO. Conclusions: The mean number of NICU beds per 1000 livebirths is within the lower limits of those been recommended, and there were wide variations among different geographical areas. A 54% of those babies admitted to NICUs required mechanical ventilation. The mean number of NICU beds per registered nurse was 2.8. There was an adequate number of neonatal ventilators (one per bed) and 63% were able to provide HFV. All NICUs hand n-CPAP systems (AU)

Eliminación espontánea de un cálculo biliar en un lactante / Spontaneous elimination of a gallstone in an infant

No disponible

Diagnóstico prenatal de la ectasia piélica. Evolución posnatal / Prenatal diagnosis of pyelectasis

Los objetivos de este estudio son conocer la prevalencia de recién nacidos con diagnóstico prenatal de ectasia piélica, determinar la frecuencia de sus distintos grados y analizar su evolución posterior. Se analizaron retrospectivamente las historias clínicas de los pacientes diagnosticados de ectasia piélica por ecografía prenatal. Se detectó ectasia piélica en la ecografía prenatal en un 6,4 por ciento de recién nacidos vivos (n= 54), con claro predominio masculino (un 80 por ciento). La mayoría de las ectasias detectadas fueron de grado leve. Una tercera parte de las ectasias diagnosticadas prenatalmente se normalizaron a los 6 meses de vida. Se detectó una baja frecuencia de enfermedad asociada: 4 casos de reflujo vesicoureteral, 3 de infección del tracto urinario y 3 que precisaron tratamiento quirúrgico (AU)

[Cutaneous colonization by Malassezia spp. in neonates]. / Colonización cutánea neonatal por Malassezia spp.

BACKGROUND: Malassezia spp. is a lipophilic yeast considered to be a normal component of the human skin flora. It has been associated with sepsis in patients receiving intravenous infusion of lipid emulsions through central venous catheters (CVC). Current evidence indicates a high rate of skin colonization in healthy adults, in contrast with the low rate of colonization in prepubertal children. Of note is the high prevalence of colonized infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS: We performed a prospective open observational study of colonization in all infants admitted to the NICU during a nine-month period (October 1997-June 1998). Length of stay in the unit, birthweight and the use of CVC for parenteral fat infusion were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-seven neonates were included in the study. The mean length of stay in the NICU was 24 days. A total of 63.6 % weighed less than 2,500 g at birth and 72 % were given parenteral nutrition supplemented with fat emulsion through a CVC. The overall rate of colonization in the unit was 41.5 and 75 % of the patients became colonized within the first two weeks of admission. CONCLUSIONS: These data emphasize the need for preventive measures to reduce the transmission of these yeasts in the NICU and to prevent the occurrence of neonatal sepsis due to Malassezia spp. in immunologically immature infants.