Prostatectomía inmediata versus demorada en pacientes que progresan a una enfermedad de mayor riesgo en vigilancia activa / Immediate versus delayed prostatectomy and the fate of patients who progress to a higher risk disease on active surveillance

Introducción: Se debaten los resultados oncológicos de la prostatectomía radical (PR) en pacientes que progresan en vigilancia activa (VA). Comparamos los resultados de los pacientes elegibles para VA sometidos a PR inmediatamente después del diagnóstico con aquellos que lo hacían después de un retraso o progresión de la enfermedad en VA. Métodos: Entre 2000 y 2014, 961 pacientes fueron elegibles para VA según los criterios de la EAU. Se comparó la PR a los 6 meses del diagnóstico (PRI) o más allá (PRT), PR sin VA (PRTa) y pacientes en VA que progresan a PR (PRTb). Se registró PSA inicial, características clínicas y de biopsia. Los resultados oncológicos incluyeron patología adversa (PA) en la muestra de PR y recurrencia bioquímica (RBQ). Se realizó un análisis de pares emparejados entre los pacientes con PRTb y GS7 sometidos a PR inmediata (GS7PRI). Resultados: PRI, PRT, PRTa y PRTb tuvieron 820 (85%), 141 (15%), 118 (12,24%) y 23 (2,7%) pacientes respectivamente. PRI, PRTa y PRTb se sometieron a PR a una mediana de 3, 9 y 19 meses después del diagnóstico, respectivamente. Las características basales fueron comparables. PRT vs. PRI tuvieron una mediana de tiempo más temprana (31 vs. 43 meses; p < 0,001) y una mayor tasa de progresión a RBQ (7,6 vs. 3,9%; p = 0,045). PRTb mostró RBQ más alta (19 frente a 5%; p = 0,021) con una mediana de tiempo más temprana a RBQ, en comparación con PRI y PRTa (p = 0,038). No hubo diferencias en las tasas de PA y RBQ, pero el tiempo hasta RBQ fue significativamente menor en PRTb (49 frente a 6 meses; p<0,001), en comparación con GS7PRI. Conclusiones: Los pacientes que progresaron en VA tuvieron los peores resultados oncológicos. PR para progresión de GS7 y par coincidente de pacientes con GS7 tuvieron resultados similares. Peores resultados oncológicos en los progresores de VA no pueden explicarse por una mera demora en PR

Introduction: Oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients progressing on active surveillance (AS) are debated. We compared outcomes of AS eligible patients undergoing RP immediately after diagnosis with those doing so after delay or disease progression on AS. Methods: Between 2000 and 2014, 961 patients were AS eligible as per EAU criteria. RP within 6 months of diagnosis (IRP) or beyond (DRP), RP without AS (DRPa) and AS patients progressing to RP (DRPb) were compared. Baseline PSA, clinical and biopsy characteristics were noted. Oncological outcomes included adverse pathology in RP specimen and biochemical recurrence (BCR). Matched pair analysis was done between DRPb and GS7 patients undergoing immediate RP (GS7IRP). Results: IRP, DRP, DRPa and DRPb had 820 (85%), 141 (15%), 118 (12.24%) and 23 (2.7%) patients respectively. IRP, DRPa and DRPb underwent RP at a median of 3, 9 and 19 months after diagnosis respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable. DRP vs. IRP had earlier median time (31 vs. 43 months; p < 0.001) and higher rate of progression to BCR (7.6 vs. 3.9%; p = 0.045). DRPb showed higher BCR (19 vs. 5%; p = 0.021) with earlier median time to BCR, compared to IRP and DRPa (p = 0.038). There was no difference in adverse pathology and BCR rates, but time to BCR was significantly lesser in DRPb (49 vs. 6 months; p < 0.001), compared to GS7IRP. Conclusions: Patients progressing on AS had worst oncological outcomes. RP for GS7 progression and matched pair of GS7 patients had similar outcomes. Worse oncological outcomes in AS progressors cannot be explained by a mere delay in RP

Resultados oncológicos y características patológicas de la sobrestadificación de cT1 a carcinoma de células renales pT3a en comparación con los tumores pT3a de novo / Oncological outcomes and pathological characteristics of cT1 upstaging to pT3a renal cell carcinoma compared with de novo pT3a tumors

Introducción: La importancia de la sobrestadificación de tumores renales cT1 a pT3a no está clara. Evaluamos la incidencia de la sobrestadificación, identificamos factores predictivos y analizamos los resultados oncológicos de estos pacientes frente a aquellos que no sobrestadificaron. También comparamos los resultados oncológicos de la sobrestadificación de cT1 a pT3a con tumores renales pT3a de novo. Métodos: De una base de datos de 1.021 tumores renales con datos de seguimiento completos disponibles, 517 pacientes tenían cT1. Los pacientes que sobrestadificaron a pT3a se compararon con aquellos que no lo hicieron. Se analizaron los resultados de las características clínicas, perioperatorias, histopatológicas y oncológicas iniciales. Resultados: De 517 pacientes con cT1, 105 (20,3%) sobrestadificaron a pT3a y 412 (79,7%) no lo hicieron. La proporción de pacientes en cada grupo tratados mediante nefrectomía parcial y radical, el tamaño del tumor postoperatorio, la histología, el estado de los márgenes, y la afectación de ganglios linfáticos fueron similares. Entre los que sobrestadificaron, 9 pacientes (8,6%) desarrollaron la primera recurrencia en comparación con solo 3 (0,7%) en aquellos que no sobrestadificaron (p < 0,001). La mediana del tiempo hasta la recurrencia (57 frente a 107 meses; p < 0,001) fue menor en los tumores renales pT3a de novo. Conclusiones: La sobrestadificación patológica de cT1 a pT3a y la necrosis en la histopatología se asociaron con la recurrencia. La edad avanzada, el tabaquismo, la necrosis en la histopatología, la histología de células claras y grados más altos de Fuhrman contribuyeron a la sobrestadificación patológica de los tumores cT1. El CCR pT3a de novo tuvo una supervivencia peor cuando se comparó con los pacientes con cT1 que sobrestadificaron a CCR pT3a

Introduction: The significance of upstaging of cT1 renal tumors to pT3a is not clear. We evaluate the incidence of upstaging, identify predictors and analyze oncological outcomes of these patients versus those who did not upstage. We also compared the oncological outcomes of cT1 upstaging to pT3a with de novo pT3a renal tumors. Methods: From a database of 1021 renal tumors with complete available follow-up data, 517 patients had cT1. Patients upstaging to pT3a were compared to those who did not. Baseline clinical, perioperative, histopathologic features and oncological outcomes were analysed. Results: Out of 517 cT1 patients, 105 (20.3%) upstaged to pT3a and 412 (79.7%) did not. Proportion of patients in each group undergoing partial and radical nephrectomy, postoperative tumor size, histology, margin status and lymph node involvement were similar. Among upstaged, 9 patients (8.6%) developed first recurrence as compared to only 3 (0.7%) in those not upstaging (P < 0.001). The median time to recurrence (57 vs. 107 months; P < 0.001) was lesser in de novo pT3a renal tumors. Conclusions: Pathological upstaging from cT1 to pT3a and necrosis on histopathology were associated with recurrence. Advanced age, smoking, necrosis on histopathology, clear cell histology and higher Fuhrman grades contributed to pathological upstaging of cT1 tumors. De novo pT3a RCC had worse survival when compared to cT1 patients upstaging to pT3a RCC

Immediate versus delayed prostatectomy and the fate of patients who progress to a higher risk disease on active surveillance. / Prostatectomía inmediata versus demorada en pacientes que progresan a una enfermedad de mayor riesgo en vigilancia activa.

INTRODUCTION: Oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients progressing on active surveillance (AS) are debated. We compared outcomes of AS eligible patients undergoing RP immediately after diagnosis with those doing so after delay or disease progression on AS. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2014, 961 patients were AS eligible as per EAU criteria. RP within 6 months of diagnosis (IRP) or beyond (DRP), RP without AS (DRPa) and AS patients progressing to RP (DRPb) were compared. Baseline PSA, clinical and biopsy characteristics were noted. Oncological outcomes included adverse pathology in RP specimen and biochemical recurrence (BCR). Matched pair analysis was done between DRPb and GS7 patients undergoing immediate RP (GS7IRP). RESULTS: IRP, DRP, DRPa and DRPb had 820 (85%), 141 (15%), 118 (12.24%) and 23 (2.7%) patients respectively. IRP, DRPa and DRPb underwent RP at a median of 3, 9 and 19 months after diagnosis respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable. DRP vs. IRP had earlier median time (31 vs. 43 months; p<.001) and higher rate of progression to BCR (7.6 vs. 3.9%;p=.045). DRPb showed higher BCR (19 vs. 5%;p=.021) with earlier median time to BCR, compared to IRP and DRPa (p=.038). There was no difference in adverse pathology and BCR rates, but time to BCR was significantly lesser in DRPb (49 vs. 6 months;p<.001), compared to GS7IRP. CONCLUSIONS: Patients progressing on AS had worst oncological outcomes. RP for GS7 progression and matched pair of GS7 patients had similar outcomes. Worse oncological outcomes in AS progressors cannot be explained by a mere delay in RP.

Oncological outcomes and pathological characteristics of cT1 upstaging to pT3a renal cell carcinoma compared with de novo pT3a tumors. / Resultados oncológicos y características patológicas de la sobrestadificación de cT1 a carcinoma de células renales pT3a en comparación con los tumores pT3a de novo.

INTRODUCTION: The significance of upstaging of cT1 renal tumors to pT3a is not clear. We evaluate the incidence of upstaging, identify predictors and analyze oncological outcomes of these patients versus those who did not upstage. We also compared the oncological outcomes of cT1 upstaging to pT3a with de novo pT3a renal tumors. METHODS: From a database of 1021 renal tumors with complete available follow-up data, 517 patients had cT1. Patients upstaging to pT3a were compared to those who did not. Baseline clinical, perioperative, histopathologic features and oncological outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: Out of 517 cT1 patients, 105 (20.3%) upstaged to pT3a and 412 (79.7%) did not. Proportion of patients in each group undergoing partial and radical nephrectomy, postoperative tumor size, histology, margin status and lymph node involvement were similar. Among upstaged, 9 patients (8.6%) developed first recurrence as compared to only 3 (0.7%) in those not upstaging (P <0.001). The median time to recurrence (57 vs. 107 months; P <0.001) was lesser in de novo pT3a renal tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Pathological upstaging from cT1 to pT3a and necrosis on histopathology were associated with recurrence. Advanced age, smoking, necrosis on histopathology, clear cell histology and higher Fuhrman grades contributed to pathological upstaging of cT1 tumors. De novo pT3a RCC had worse survival when compared to cT1 patients upstaging to pT3a RCC.

[Management of ablative therapies in prostate cancer]. / Traitements ablatifs pour cancer de prostate : modalités de prise en charge.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the specific modalities of ablative therapies management in prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the scientific literature was performed in Medline database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com) using different associations of keywords. Publications obtained were selected based on methodology, language and relevance. After selection, 61 articles were analysed. RESULTS: Development of innovations such as ablative therapies in prostate cancer induces specific modalities in their management, during pre-, per- and post-procedure. More than for classical and well-known treatments, the decision to propose an ablative therapy requires analysis and consensus of medical staff and patient's agreement. Patient's specificities and economical aspects must also be considered. Procedures and follow-up must be realized by referents actors. CONCLUSION: Indication, procedure and follow-up of ablative therapies in prostate cancer require specific modalities. They must be respected in order to optimize the results and to obtain a precise and objective evaluation for defining future indications.

Revisión sistemática de resultados perioperatorios y complicaciones después de cistectomía radical abierta, laparoscópica y asistida por robot / Systematic review of perioperative outcomes and complications after open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy

La cistectomía radical y disección de los ganglios linfáticos regionales es el tratamiento estándar para el cáncer vesical músculo invasivo localizado y no músculo-invasivo de alto riesgo, y representa uno de los principales procedimientos quirúrgicos urológicos. El abordaje quirúrgico abierto es todavía ampliamente adoptado, aunque en las últimas 2 décadas se han hecho esfuerzos con el fin de evaluar si los procedimientos mínimamente invasivos, ya sean laparoscópicos o asistidos por robot, podrían mostrar un beneficio en comparación con la técnica estándar. La cistectomía radical abierta se asocia con una alta tasa de complicaciones, pero los datos de la serie quirúrgica laparoscópica y robótica no lograron demostrar una clara reducción en las tasas de complicaciones postoperatorias en comparación con la serie quirúrgica abierta. La cistectomía radical laparoscópica y robótica muestran una reducción en la pérdida de sangre, las tasas de estancia hospitalaria y de transfusión, pero un mayor tiempo operatorio, mientras que la cistectomía radical abierta se asocia típicamente con un tiempo operatorio más corto, pero con un ingreso más largo en el hospital y, posiblemente, una mayor tasa complicaciones de alto grado

Radical cystectomy and regional lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for localized muscle-invasive and for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and represents one of the main surgical urologic procedures. The open surgical approach is still widely adopted, even if in the last two decades efforts have been made in order to evaluate if minimally invasive procedures, either laparoscopic or robot-assisted, might show a benefit compared to the standard technique. Open radical cystectomy is associated with a high complication rate, but data from the laparoscopic and robotic surgical series failed to demonstrate a clear reduction in post-operative complication rates compared to the open surgical series. Laparoscopic and robotic radical cystectomy show a reduction in blood loss, in-hospital stay and transfusion rates but a longer operative time, while open radical cystectomy is typically associated with a shorter operative time but with a longer in-hospital admission and possibly a higher rate of high grade complications

Systematic review of perioperative outcomes and complications after open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy. / Revisión sistemática de resultados perioperatorios y complicaciones después de cistectomía radical abierta, laparoscópica y asistida por robot.

Radical cystectomy and regional lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for localized muscle-invasive and for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and represents one of the main surgical urologic procedures. The open surgical approach is still widely adopted, even if in the last two decades efforts have been made in order to evaluate if minimally invasive procedures, either laparoscopic or robot-assisted, might show a benefit compared to the standard technique. Open radical cystectomy is associated with a high complication rate, but data from the laparoscopic and robotic surgical series failed to demonstrate a clear reduction in post-operative complication rates compared to the open surgical series. Laparoscopic and robotic radical cystectomy show a reduction in blood loss, in-hospital stay and transfusion rates but a longer operative time, while open radical cystectomy is typically associated with a shorter operative time but with a longer in-hospital admission and possibly a higher rate of high grade complications.

Ultrasonido focalizado de alta intensidad con el dispositivo Focal-One(R): impacto sobre el antígeno prostático específico y evaluación de la morbilidad durante la experiencia inicial / High intensity focused ultrasound with Focal-One(R) device: prostate-specific antigen impact and morbidity evaluation during the initial experience

Objetivos: Reportamos nuestra experiencia inicial en el tratamiento del cáncer de próstata (PCa) con ultrasonido focalizado de alta intensidad (HIFU) utilizando el dispositivo Focal-One(R). Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de datos recogidos prospectivamente. Entre junio de 2014 y octubre de 2015, 85 pacientes recibieron tratamiento HIFU (focal/total), para PCa localizado. La localización preoperatoria del tumor fue realizada con resonancia magnética multiparamétrica (mpMRI) y biopsias prostáticas mediante mapeo transperineal. El tratamiento fue realizado utilizando el dispositivo Focal-One(R)® bajo anestesia general. Seguimiento oncológico: medición del PSA y biopsia control con mpMRI según protocolo. Los resultados funcionales fueron evaluados mediante cuestionarios validados y las complicaciones reportadas utilizando la clasificación Clavien. Resultados: La mediana de PSA fue 7,79ng/ml (6,32-9,16) con una mediana de volumen prostático de 38cc (33-49,75). El tratamiento fue focal y total en 64 y 21 pacientes respectivamente. Diez pacientes recibieron tratamiento de rescate. La tasa de complicaciones fue del 15%, todas Clavien 2. La estancia hospitalaria media fue 1,8 días (0-7) y la sonda vesical fue retirada el día 2 (1-6). La media de reducción porcentual del PSA fue 54%. La mediana de seguimiento fue 3 meses (2-8). Resultados funcionales: todos los pacientes estuvieron continentes a los 3 meses y la potencia se mantuvo en el 83% de los previamente potentes. Conclusiones: El tratamiento HIFU Focal-One(R) es un procedimiento seguro con pocas complicaciones. Los resultados funcionales no reportan casos de incontinencia y la función sexual se mantuvo en el 83%

Objective: We report our initial experience in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) using the Focal-One(R) device. Material and methods: Retrospective review of the prospectively populated database. Between June 2014 to October 2015, 85 patients underwent HIFU (focal/whole-gland) treatment for localized PCa. Preoperative cancer localization was done with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transperineal mapping biopsies. Treatment was carried out using the Focal-One(R) device under general anesthesia. Oncological follow-up: PSA measurement and control biopsy with mpMRI according to protocol. Questionnaire-based functional outcome assessment was done. Complications were reported using Clavien classification. Results: The median PSA was 7.79ng/ml (IQR 6.32-9.16), with a median prostate volume of 38cc (IQR: 33-49.75). Focal and whole-gland therapy was performed in 64 and 21 patients respectively. Ten patients received salvage HIFU. Complications were encountered in 15% of cases, all Clavien 2 graded. Mean hospital stay was 1.8 days (0-7) and bladder catheter was removed on day 2 (1-6). Mean percentage reduction of PSA was 54%. Median follow-up was 3 months (IQR: 2-8). Functional outcomes: All patients were continents at 3 months and potency was maintained in 83% of the preoperatively potent. Conclusions: Focal-One(R) HIFU treatment appears to be a safe procedure with few complications. Functional outcomes proved no urinary incontinence and sexual function were maintained in 83%

Evolución de las técnicas de biopsia prostática. Mirando hacia atrás en un viaje significativo / Evolution of prostate biopsy techniques. Looking back on a meaningful journey

Antecedentes: La técnica de la biopsia de próstata ha evolucionado mucho desde sus inicios hasta ser un procedimiento de diagnóstico seguro. Los principios de la técnica de biopsia siguen mejorando con el conocimiento sobre el cáncer de próstata y la disponibilidad de opciones de tratamiento más nuevas, como la vigilancia activa y la terapia focal. Actualmente, dependemos de información más exacta sobre el cáncer de la biopsia que nunca para decidir la opción de tratamiento ideal. Objetivo: El objetivo de esta revisión es presentar los principales hitos en la evolución de la técnica de la biopsia de próstata y su impacto en el manejo del cáncer de próstata. Adquisición de la evidencia: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica no sistemática detallada para presentar los hechos históricos sobre las transformaciones en las técnicas de biopsia de próstata y también la dirección de la actual investigación para mejorar la detección del cáncer precisa. Resumen de la evidencia: Hay un claro cambio de tendencia en la técnica de biopsia antes y después de la introducción de la ecografía transrectal y el antígeno prostático específico. En la época anterior, las biopsias fueron dirigidas a los nódulos palpables y a la obtención de tejido prostático adecuado para el diagnóstico, mientras que la época posterior se ha desplazado hacia la detección del cáncer de próstata no palpable y temprano. Recientemente, existe una tendencia creciente hacia biopsias dirigidas guiadas por imagen para extraer el máximo de información del cáncer a partir de núcleos de biopsia mínimos. Conclusión: Las técnicas de biopsia de próstata han visto grandes cambios desde su creación y tienen un impacto importante en el manejo del el cáncer de próstata. Hay un gran potencial para la investigación que puede apoyar aún más las opciones de tratamiento más nuevas, como la terapia focal

Background: The technique of prostate biopsy has evolved a long way since its inception to being a safe diagnostic procedure. The principles of the biopsy technique continue to improvise with the knowledge about prostate cancer and availability of newer treatment options like active surveillance and focal therapy. Currently, we depend on accurate cancer information from the biopsy more than ever for deciding the ideal treatment option. Aim: The aim of this review is to present the major milestones in prostate biopsy technique evolutions and its impact on the prostate cancer management. Acquisition of evidence: We performed a detailed non-systematic literature review to present the historical facts on the transformations in prostate biopsy techniques and also the direction of present research to improve accurate cancer detection. Summary of evidence: There is a clear change in trend in biopsy technique before and after the introduction of transrectal ultrasound and prostate specific antigen. In the earlier era, the biopsies were aimed at palpable nodules and obtaining adequate prostatic tissue for diagnosis while the later era has moved towards detection of non-palpable and early prostate cancer. Recently, there is an increasing trend towards image guided targeted biopsies to extract maximum cancer information from minimum biopsy cores. Conclusion: Prostate biopsy techniques have seen major changes since its inception and have a major impact on prostate cancer management. There is a great potential for research which can further support the newer treatment options like focal therapy

High intensity focused ultrasound with Focal-One® device: Prostate-specific antigen impact and morbidity evaluation during the initial experience. / Ultrasonido focalizado de alta intensidad con el dispositivo Focal-One®: impacto sobre el antígeno prostático específico y evaluación de la morbilidad durante la experiencia inicial.

OBJECTIVE: We report our initial experience in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) using the Focal-One® device. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of the prospectively populated database. Between June 2014 to October 2015, 85 patients underwent HIFU (focal/whole-gland) treatment for localized PCa. Preoperative cancer localization was done with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transperineal mapping biopsies. Treatment was carried out using the Focal-One® device under general anesthesia. Oncological follow-up: PSA measurement and control biopsy with mpMRI according to protocol. Questionnaire-based functional outcome assessment was done. Complications were reported using Clavien classification. RESULTS: The median PSA was 7.79ng/ml (IQR 6.32-9.16), with a median prostate volume of 38cc (IQR: 33-49.75). Focal and whole-gland therapy was performed in 64 and 21 patients respectively. Ten patients received salvage HIFU. Complications were encountered in 15% of cases, all Clavien 2 graded. Mean hospital stay was 1.8 days (0-7) and bladder catheter was removed on day 2 (1-6). Mean percentage reduction of PSA was 54%. Median follow-up was 3 months (IQR: 2-8). Functional outcomes: All patients were continents at 3 months and potency was maintained in 83% of the preoperatively potent. CONCLUSIONS: Focal-One® HIFU treatment appears to be a safe procedure with few complications. Functional outcomes proved no urinary incontinence and sexual function were maintained in 83%.

Evolution of prostate biopsy techniques. Looking back on a meaningful journey. / Evolución de las técnicas de biopsia prostática. Mirando hacia atrás en un viaje significativo.

BACKGROUND: The technique of prostate biopsy has evolved a long way since its inception to being a safe diagnostic procedure. The principles of the biopsy technique continue to improvise with the knowledge about prostate cancer and availability of newer treatment options like active surveillance and focal therapy. Currently, we depend on accurate cancer information from the biopsy more than ever for deciding the ideal treatment option. AIM: The aim of this review is to present the major milestones in prostate biopsy technique evolutions and its impact on the prostate cancer management. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE: We performed a detailed non-systematic literature review to present the historical facts on the transformations in prostate biopsy techniques and also the direction of present research to improve accurate cancer detection. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE: There is a clear change in trend in biopsy technique before and after the introduction of transrectal ultrasound and prostate specific antigen. In the earlier era, the biopsies were aimed at palpable nodules and obtaining adequate prostatic tissue for diagnosis while the later era has moved towards detection of non-palpable and early prostate cancer. Recently, there is an increasing trend towards image guided targeted biopsies to extract maximum cancer information from minimum biopsy cores. CONCLUSION: Prostate biopsy techniques have seen major changes since its inception and have a major impact on prostate cancer management. There is a great potential for research which can further support the newer treatment options like focal therapy.

La robótica en la cirugía urológica: evolución, estado actual y perspectivas futuras / Robotics in urological surgery: Evolution, current status and future perspectives

Contexto: La cirugía robótica evoluciona rápidamente y se ha convertido en una parte esencial de la práctica quirúrgica en diversas partes del mundo. En el futuro la tecnología robótica se expandirá globalmente y la mayoría de los cirujanos en todo el mundo tendrán acceso a robots quirúrgicos. Es fundamental que nos mantengamos al día en cuanto a los resultados de los procedimientos quirúrgicos asistidos por robots, lo que permitirá a todos desarrollar una opinión imparcial sobre la utilidad clínica de esta innovación. Objetivo: El objetivo de esta revisión es presentar la evolución, una evaluación objetiva de los resultados clínicos y las perspectivas futuras de las cirugías urológicas asistidas por robot. Adquisición de la evidencia: Se llevó a cabo una revisión bibliográfica sistemática de los resultados clínicos de las cirugías urológicas robóticas en PubMed. Se incluyeron ensayos controlados aleatorios, estudios de cohortes y revisiones de artículos. Además, se realizó una búsqueda detallada en el buscador de la web para obtener información sobre la evolución y las tecnologías en desarrollo en robótica. Síntesis de la evidencia: La evidencia actual sugiere que los resultados clínicos de las cirugías urológicas asistidas por robot son comparables a los resultados de cirugías convencionales abiertas y laparoscópicas, y se asocian con menos complicaciones. Sin embargo, no se dispone de resultados a largo plazo de todas las cirugías urológicas robóticas comunes. Son muchos los desarrollos innovadores en robótica que estarán disponibles para el uso clínico en un futuro cercano. Conclusión: La cirugía urológica robótica continuará evolucionando en el futuro. Deberíamos seguir analizando críticamente si los avances en tecnología y el mayor coste se traducen finalmente en un mejor rendimiento quirúrgico global y en mejores resultados

Context: Robotic surgery is rapidly evolving and has become an essential part of surgical practice in several parts of the world. Robotic technology will expand globally and most of the surgeons around the world will have access to surgical robots in the future. It is essential that we are updated about the outcomes of robot assisted surgeries which will allow everyone to develop an unbiased opinion on the clinical utility of this innovation. Objective: In this review we aim to present the evolution, objective evaluation of clinical outcomes and future perspectives of robot assisted urologic surgeries. Acquisition of evidence: A systematic literature review of clinical outcomes of robotic urological surgeries was made in the PUBMED. Randomized control trials, cohort studies and review articles were included. Moreover, a detailed search in the web based search engine was made to acquire information on evolution and evolving technologies in robotics. Synthesis of evidence: The present evidence suggests that the clinical outcomes of the robot assisted urologic surgeries are comparable to the conventional open surgical and laparoscopic results and are associated with fewer complications. However, long term results are not available for all the common robotic urologic surgeries. There are plenty of novel developments in robotics to be available for clinical use in the future. Conclusion: Robotic urologic surgery will continue to evolve in the future. We should continue to critically analyze whether the advances in technology and the higher cost eventually translates to improved overall surgical performance and outcomes

Robotics in urological surgery: evolution, current status and future perspectives.

CONTEXT: Robotic surgery is rapidly evolving and has become an essential part of surgical practice in several parts of the world. Robotic technology will expand globally and most of the surgeons around the world will have access to surgical robots in the future. It is essential that we are updated about the outcomes of robot assisted surgeries which will allow everyone to develop an unbiased opinion on the clinical utility of this innovation. OBJECTIVE: In this review we aim to present the evolution, objective evaluation of clinical outcomes and future perspectives of robot assisted urologic surgeries. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE: A systematic literature review of clinical outcomes of robotic urological surgeries was made in the PUBMED. Randomized control trials, cohort studies and review articles were included. Moreover, a detailed search in the web based search engine was made to acquire information on evolution and evolving technologies in robotics. SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE: The present evidence suggests that the clinical outcomes of the robot assisted urologic surgeries are comparable to the conventional open surgical and laparoscopic results and are associated with fewer complications. However, long term results are not available for all the common robotic urologic surgeries. There are plenty of novel developments in robotics to be available for clinical use in the future. CONCLUSION: Robotic urologic surgery will continue to evolve in the future. We should continue to critically analyze whether the advances in technology and the higher cost eventually translates to improved overall surgical performance and outcomes.

[Effect of wound infiltration of ropivacaine in postoperative pain after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy]. / Effet de l'infiltration pariétale d'anesthésique local (ropivacaïne) sur la douleur postoperatoire après prostatectomie radicale laparoscopique sous-péritonéale.

PURPOSE: Evaluation of the efficiency of wound infiltration of ropivacaine in postoperative pain after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective single institution study included 130 patients treated by extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from January to March 2007. One hundred and two patients were included and randomised in two groups according to the year of birth (pair or impair). Only patients from the first group (year pair) had wound infiltration at the end of the procedure. The second group (year impair) was the control group. An analogic visual scale (EVA) permitted evaluation of pain at 30 minutes, 1, 6 and 12 hours after the procedure. Use of analgesics after procedure were noted for each patient. RESULTS: In the first group, the median of EVA was 1.44, 1.34, 1.72 and 1.51 respectively at 30 minutes, 1, 6 and 12 hours. In the second group, the median of EVA was 1.28, 1.36, 1.46 and 1.44. We found no statistically significant difference for pain and use of analgesic between the two groups (p=0.71, 0.96, 0.47 and 0.86 respectively at 30 minutes, 1, 6 and 12 hours). CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine in wound infiltration did not decrease significantly the postoperative pain and must not be used systematically.

High detection rate of circulating tumor cells in blood of patients with prostate cancer using telomerase activity.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) cannot be readily detected with currently available methods in the majority of patients with prostate cancer. Telomerase activation, one of the major immortalization events, is found in most cases of prostate cancer. We attempted to develop a method using telomerase activity to isolate CTCs in patients with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from whole blood using Ficoll-Hypaque. Immunomagnetic beads coated with an epithelial cell-specific antigen antibody (BerEP4) were used to harvest epithelial cells from PBMCs. Telomerase activity was detected in harvested epithelial cells using the telomerase-PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. RESULTS: Blood samples from 107 patients with prostate cancer were studied. CTCs were detected in 19 of 24 (79%) patients with advanced prostate cancer. In contrast, CTCs were not detected in blood samples from 22 healthy male volunteers. CTCs were even identified in patients with an undetectable (<0.1 ng/ml) serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). CTCs were detected in 55 of 70 (79%) patients with localized prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy (n = 30) or brachytherapy (n = 40). CTCs were also detected in 3 of 13 patients (23%) with an undetectable serum PSA measured at least 1 year after radical prostatectomy, which is consistent with the expected relapse rate in this setting. CONCLUSION: CTCs can be detected using telomerase activity in a large majority and a wide variety of patients with prostate cancer, including those with localized disease.

Detection of HER-2/neu-positive circulating epithelial cells in prostate cancer patients.

HER-2/neu may play a role in prostate carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to use the expression of HER-2/neu as a molecular marker for the detection of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in the blood of patients with prostate cancer (PC). Blood samples were collected from 42 patients with PC and nine healthy volunteers. Immunomagnetic beads were used to harvest epithelial cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Total RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed before analysis by real-time PCR with HER-2/neu-specific primers. CTCs were HER-2/neu positive in six out of 11 (54%) patients with metastatic disease and in three out of 31 (9.6%) patients with localised PC (P=0.004). In blood samples from nine healthy volunteers, we detected no expression of HER-2/neu. The present method appears to be minimally invasive, highly sensitive and a specific approach for detecting CTCs in PC. Furthermore, it may help better target HER-2/neu in advanced PC.

[Competitive morbidity ant its impact on life expectancy: evaluation and inclusion in the therapeutic decision regarding localized prostatic cancer]. / La morbidité compétitive et son impact sur l'espérance de vie: évaluation et prise en compte dans la décision thérapeutique du cancer localisé de la prostate.

OBJECTIVES: The treatment decision taken by a multidisciplinary meeting for patients with localized prostate cancer must take into account the clinical stage of the cancer and its histological characteristics, but also the patient's age, general state and any concomitant diseases, as treatment is only beneficial when it induces a reduction of morbidity and specific mortality. The specific survival with or without recurrence after treatment for localized prostate cancer is long, at least more than 10 years. Curative treatment is generally not proposed to men with localized prostate cancer when his probability of survival related to a competitive morbidity (intercurrent medical disease) is estimated to be less than 10 years. The objective of this study was to measure the increase or reduction of the survival probability of a patient with localized prostate cancer according to his competitive morbidity, based on the mean life expectancy of the general population. METHODS: Review of the literature. RESULTS: Studies describing the natural history of prostate cancer show that the impact of treatment on morbidity of the cancer (local and/or metastatic) requires a life expectancy of about 8 to 10 years. The impact of a treatment on specific survival requires a life expectancy of about 13 to 15 years. The exact prevalence of diseases coexisting with prostate cancer is unknown. In the USA, The Index of Coexisting Disease (ICD), which takes into account 14 diseases, appears to be the most reliable tool to measure the competitive morbidity in patients with localized prostate cancer. Each disease is classified into 4 levels of severity (score 0 to 3). A table indicates estimated life expectancies by age-group and by ICD score. All men with a high score (2 to 3) die within 10 years after diagnosis, men with a score of 0 have a better estimated life expectancy according to age than that of the general population. CONCLUSION: The upper age limit, theoretically set at 70 years, in order to propose curative treatment for localized prostate cancer needs to be reviewed (the mean life expectancy for a 70-year-old man is 12.9 years in France). According to the ICD, the life expectancy at 70 years is 14.8 years in the case of a score of 0 and 8.4 years in the case of a score of 2. In the case of a score of 2, the impact of curative treatment on localized prostate cancer would be real on morbidity, but not on specific mortality.

[BCG therapy of superficial tumors of the bladder]. / La BCGthérapie des tumeurs superficielles de la vessie.

Superficial bladder tumor defined as pTa, pT1 and pTis stage is one of the most common cancer disease in the world. Intravesical BCGtherapy represents the best treatment when combined with transurethral resection to prevent tumor recurrence or progression and to lengthen the interval between recurrence. The toxicity is quite important but can be reduced by using the good procedure. Local or general immunostimulation is likely to be the exact mechanism of action but more data are needed.

MHC-dependent cytolysis of autologous tumor cells by lymphocytes infiltrating urothelial carcinomas.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were grown from 23 urothelial carcinomas. Phenotyping analysis showed that the TIL cultures were mainly CD3+. Although CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell sub-sets were grown in culture, CD4+ T-cell sub-sets predominated over CD8+ T cells. Immunohistochemical studies performed on 5 tumor specimens confirmed this observation, and indicated that CD4+ T cells surrounded the tumor islets, whereas CD8+ T lymphocytes were localized among the tumor cells. Five short-term carcinoma cell lines established from these urothelial tumors were used as target cells in cytolysis assays in order to investigate the functional anti-tumor activity of autologous TIL. TIL from 4/5 tumors were lytic and 3 TIL lines displayed MHC-class-I-dependent cytotoxicity directed against autologous tumor cells. CD4+ T-cell-depletion experiments performed on TIL line 07 confirmed that CD8+ MHC-class-I-dependent CTL were the predominant effectors. Finally, experiments performed on 6 allogeneic urothelial-cancer cell lines matched for HLA-class-I molecules showed that TIL07 exhibited selective lytic activity toward tumor 07. These data indicate that CD8+ MHC-class-I-dependent CTL present in urothelial carcinomas are functional and may participate in the anti-tumor immune response.