RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Splenic sequestration crisis is a potentially fatal complication of sickle cell disease, mainly seen in young children. Only a few case series describe the acute splenic sequestration crisis in adults and its management, which primarily consists of supportive care and, in some cases, splenectomy. Splenic artery embolization has seldom been described in sickle cell disease. This is probably the first case in which an adult with sickle cell disease presented with an acute splenic sequestration crisis was managed successfully through splenic artery embolization. RESULTS: This 22-year-old female, a known case of sickle cell disease, presented with severe pain in the abdomen and low-grade intermittent fever for two days, secondary to an acute splenic sequestration crisis. The diagnosis of acute splenic sequestration was made based on clinical and blood parameters, ultrasonography, and computed tomography. Even with adequate supportive care and blood transfusions, the patient's condition worsened with a rapid fall in the hemoglobin and total platelet count. Considering splenectomy to be a high-risk procedure for this patient, a decision of rescue splenic artery embolization was taken, which was successful. CONCLUSION: Splenic artery embolization may be considered a lifesaving procedure in patients with acute splenic sequestration, where the risk of splenectomy can be high. Adequate post-procedure supportive care is vital for preventing complications.
Asunto(s)
Anemia de Células Falciformes , Embolización Terapéutica , Arteria Esplénica , Humanos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Femenino , Anemia de Células Falciformes/complicaciones , Anemia de Células Falciformes/terapia , Arteria Esplénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto Joven , Enfermedades del Bazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades del Bazo/terapia , Enfermedades del Bazo/etiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols has questioned the placement of prophylactic drain after curative gastrectomy. A 2015 Cochrane meta-analysis did not find convincing evidence of routine drain placement in gastrectomy, but the quality of evidence was questioned. The present study compared short-term outcomes of prophylactic drain placement versus no drain in gastrectomy. METHODOLOGY: The study is a prospective, non-inferiority, and randomized controlled trial. Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach undergoing curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy was included in the study. Randomization was done intra-operatively. The primary outcome was a postoperative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included the return of bowel function, achieving adequate enteral feeding, re-surgery, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients were registered, of which 108 patients underwent curative surgery, and were randomized to 54 patients in each group. The median age was 55 years (range: 23-78) and 58.5 years (range: 35-80) in the drain and no drain group. No significant difference was noticed in primary or secondary outcomes in both groups. CONCLUSION: Avoid placing a prophylactic drain is not inferior to drain placement following gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for stomach adenocarcinoma. So, routine prophylactic drain placement can be avoided.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Gastrectomía/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Background: Pain, swelling and joint stiffness are the major problems following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery that restrict early return to sports and athletic activities. The patients often receive prolonged analgesic medications to control the inflammatory response and resume the pre-injury activities. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraarticular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA) injection following ACLR. Material and methods: A literature search of electronic databases and a manual search of studies reporting clinical effectiveness of IA HA following ACLR was performed on 1st November 2020. The quality of the methodology and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale for randomized-controlled trial and prospective cohort studies, respectively. Results: Of 324 studies retrieved, four studies (3 RCTs and one prospective cohort study) were found to be suitable for inclusion in this review. These studies had a low to moderate risk of bias. There were 182 patients in the HA group and 121 patients in the control group. The demographic characteristics of the patients were similar in all studies. The pooled analysis of studies evaluating pain at different follow up periods (2-week, 4-6 weeks, 8-12 weeks) after ACLR revealed no significant difference between the HA and control groups (p > 0.05). The knee swelling was significantly less in the HA group at two weeks (MD -7.85, 95% CI: [-15.03, -0.68], p = 0.03, I2 = 0%), but no such difference was noted after 4-6 weeks and 8-12 weeks. The functional outcome score was not significantly different between the groups (SMD 0.00, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.38, p = 0.99, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Although the individual study demonstrated a short-term positive response regarding pain control and swelling reduction, the pooled analysis did not find any clinical benefit of IA HA injection following ACLR surgery. Level of evidence: II.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study intends to compare the clinical characteristics and the prevalence and spectrum of bacterial pathogens in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU during the first and second waves at a tertiary care, teaching and referral hospital of eastern India. METHOD: This is a hospital-based retrospective study which analysed demographic details, clinical profile and bacterial culture results of severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted in intensive care units (ICU) during April -Oct 2020 (1st wave) and April -July 2021 (2nd wave). RESULT: The patients admitted during the 2nd wave were comparatively older and had multiple comorbidities compared to the 1st wave. (23.8%) (45/189) and 50% (173/346) of the COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU developed bacterial infection during the 1st and 2nd wave respectively. Overall, there was predominance of multidrug resistant Gram negative bacilli in both the waves. There was increased isolation of intrinsic colistin resistant microorganisms. CONCLUSION: Multidrug resistant Gram negative bacterial infections, remain a dreaded complication in severe and critically ill hospitalised COVID-19 patients requiring ICU care and high usage of colistin spirals the emergence and spread of pathogens intrinsically resistant to colistin.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Colistina , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacterias , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We aim to study the effect of epidural morphine as a means to reduce high respiratory drive in COVID 19 patients on non-invasive ventilation (NIV)-primary end point-and to study its effect on respiratory parameters, subjective patient comfort, rates of endotracheal intubation, duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality. TRIAL DESIGN: Parallel group, randomised, double blind, single centre placebo control trial. Allocation ratio 1:1, superiority trial PARTICIPANTS: Trial site and population-COVID ICU patients in the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India Inclusion and exclusion criteria Inclusion criteria Adult patients on NIV with COVID-19 Exclusion criteria Metabolic acidosis HCO3-< 16 and pH < 7.2. Severe hypoxemia warranting cessation of NIV and intubation, non-acceptance of NIV and proven sepsis. Technical difficulty for epidural catheterization, coagulation abnormalities, low respiratory drive and EOL orders. Sources or methods of recruitment-daily discussion at 8 am of new admissions to COVID ICU on NIV-consenting adult patients with COVID19 on NIV and high respiratory drive; not meeting exclusion criteria will be recruited for the trial and randomised. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Patients of both groups will be turned to a lateral or sitting position (as comfortable), and an injection of local anaesthetic be given at lumbar 2-3/3-4 space. In the intervention group, an epidural catheter will be inserted using aseptic technique and fixed to the skin. The control group will have a sham catheter fixed exactly like in the intervention group, but not entering the epidural space. The intervention group will be administered injection morphine sulphate once every 18-24 h into the epidural space. The doses will be escalated daily (5-10 mg), titrated to effect: escalation limited by hypoventilation resulting in respiratory acidosis (pH < 7.2). The intervention will continue for a minimum of 2 doses and a maximum of 5 doses (96 h) of morphine. It will be stopped if the epidural catheter gets dislodged before the second dose or the patient is weaned off non-invasive ventilation to high flow mask for a continuous period of 24 h or requires endotracheal intubation. The patient will be followed up till death or 28 days after ICU discharge. MAIN OUTCOMES: Primary outcome-diaphragm thickening index fraction (average of minimum 3 readings) Secondary outcomes-ventilator parameters, sedation and pain scores, subjective comfort and dyspnoea scores, time to intubation, length of stay on NIV and 28-day mortality Timing of outcome assessment-every 8th hour assessment for 24 h after the last dose of epidural morphine or 120 h whichever is greater RANDOMISATION: A central random number list will be kept with the study research assistant. She will randomise according to the numbers available in the list using an allocation ratio of 1:1. An opaque sealed envelope concealing the allotted randomisation code will be dispatched to the ICU team. BLINDING (MASKING): The assessor, patient, nurses and physicians will be blind to group allocation. One member of the team not involved in research will administer the intervention. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): Twenty-five patients per group; 50 patients total TRIAL STATUS: Protocol version 1. Not recruiting yet. Recruitment to begin by 24 July 2021 and end by 31 August 2022 TRIAL REGISTRATION: Central Trials Registry India CTRI CTRI/2021/07/035093 . Registered on 23 July 2021. Prospectively registered FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest of expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Adulto , Espacio Epidural , Humanos , Morfina/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antifibrinolytic drugs are widely used to minimize blood loss and transfusion requirements in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although tranexamic acid (TXA) has been widely studied for its use in TKA, there are limited studies on epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA). METHODS: In a double-blind randomized control trial, all patients (nâ¯=â¯91) operated with bilateral simultaneous TKA were randomly given either intravenous EACA or placebo (normal saline). A single surgeon performed the TKA with posterior-stabilized implants under tourniquet. A suction drain was placed and kept for 48â¯h postoperatively. The intraoperative blood loss and drain output were calculated. The postoperative hemoglobin (Hb), drop in Hb, total blood loss, and number of blood transfusions in each group were calculated. RESULTS: Both of the groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, body mass index, and pre-operative Hb. There was a significant difference between the EACA group and control group in terms of intraoperative blood loss (150â¯ml vs. 165â¯ml, Pâ¯=â¯0.01), drain output (494â¯ml vs. 1062â¯ml, Pâ¯<â¯0.001), postoperative Hb (9.9â¯g/dl vs. 8.6â¯g/dl, Pâ¯=â¯0.002), drop in Hb (2.2â¯g/dl vs. 3.1â¯g/dl, Pâ¯=â¯0.026) and transfusion rate (median transfusion 0 vs. 1, Pâ¯<â¯0.001). The total blood loss, as calculated by the Hb balance method, was significantly less (Pâ¯<â¯0.001) in the EACA group (0.99â¯l) compared with the control group (2.71â¯l). None of the patients developed any adverse reaction/complication to the drug. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative administration of EACA significantly decreased the blood loss and postoperative transfusion rates compared with no antifibrinolytic therapy in bilateral simultaneous TKA.
Asunto(s)
Ácido Aminocaproico/uso terapéutico , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/prevención & control , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/instrumentación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , TorniquetesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Opioids are associated with postoperative nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, and increased analgesic requirement. A nonopioid anesthesia technique may reduce morbidity, enable day care surgery, and possibly decrease tumor recurrence. We compared opioid-free, nerve block-based anesthesia with opioid-based general anesthesia for breast cancer surgery in a prospective cohort study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty four adult American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I-III patients posted for modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with axillary dissection were induced with propofol and maintained on isoflurane (0.8-1.0 minimum alveolar concentration) through i-gel on spontaneous ventilation and administered ultrasound-guided PECS 1 and 2 blocks (0.1% lignocaine + 0.25% bupivacaine + 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine, 30 ml). Postoperative nausea, pain scores, nonopioid analgesic requirement over 24 h, stay in the recovery room, and satisfaction of surgeon and patient were studied. Twenty-four patients who underwent MRM and axillary dissection without a nerve block under routine opioid anesthesia with controlled ventilation were the controls. RESULTS: MRM and axillary dissection under the nonopioid technique was adequate in all patients. Time in the recovery room, postoperative nausea, analgesic requirement, and visual analog scale scores were all significantly less in the nonopioid group. Surgeon and patient were satisfied with good patient quality of life on day 7. CONCLUSION: Nonopioid nerve block technique is adequate and safe for MRM with axillary clearance. Compared to conventional technique, it offers lesser morbidity and may allow for earlier discharge. Larger studies are needed to assess the long-term impact on chronic pain and tumor recurrence by nonopioid techniques.
RESUMEN
Savlon (0.5% cetrimide/0.05% chlorhexidine) is used as a scolicidal during surgery of hydatid cysts. It is considered a safe and effective agent. However, there are no recommendations for the appropriate concentration or dosage of these agents. Previously reported to cause severe metabolic acidosis, its effects on the pulmonary system have not been explored. We present a case of acute lung injury and respiratory distress along with acute cardiopulmonary distress, severe metabolic acidosis, and renal failure following its use during surgical removal of pulmonary hydatid cyst. The agent may act as a chemical sclerosant causing pulmonary parenchymal damage through bronchial openings present in the pericyst. Till safe dose limits are known, use of this agent should be limited, especially in large or multiple cyst surgery.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Cetrimonio/efectos adversos , Clorhexidina/efectos adversos , Equinococosis Pulmonar/cirugía , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
Autonomic dysreflexia is a medical emergency in spinal cord injury. Majority of cases of autonomic dysreflexia are known to be induced by either bladder or bowel distension. Very few cases of recurrent postural autonomic dysreflexia, due to secondary spinal pathology, have been reported. Discovertebral or Andersson lesion, a recognized complication in Ankylosing Spondylitis, can give rise to similar kind of recurrent postural dysreflexic symptoms. Here, we report a case of Ankylosing Spondylitis with high level, complete spinal cord injury, where the patient was developing recurrent postural autonomic dysreflexia and its successful management. Andersson lesion in the lumbar spine below the level of injury was demonstrated in this case report.
RESUMEN
An important risk factor for nosocomial infection in an intensive care unit (ICU) is prior colonization. This study was undertaken to determine the spectrum of bacterial colonization and predisposing risk factors in patients being admitted to an ICU in India, with special emphasis on extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)- and metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing Gram-negative bacteria. Nasal, oral and rectal swab samples were collected and processed for isolation of ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria and MBL-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species. Bacterial colonization (of one or more sites) on admission was detected in 51 out of 96 patients included in the study. Non-fermenters, i.e. P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, were the most common colonizers, present in 37 patients, with simultaneous colonization in 12 patients. A total of 16 patients were colonized with MBL-producing members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, out of which 11 isolates (from 5 patients) were also carrying ESBL-encoding genes. As for MBLs, most of our patients have shown colonization with ESBL-producing bacteria. On admission, 47 of 51 patients (92 %) have been colonized by ESBL-producing members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, at one or more of the three anatomical sites. The most common MBL subtype was bla(IMP) (51.56 %), whereas bla(CTX) was the most common gene (84.9 %) identified among ESBL producers. Risk factors for colonization on admission to the ICU were hospitalization for more than 48 h, use of >or=3 groups of antibiotics, co-morbidities and mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h prior to ICU admission. There is an increasing incidence of MBLs and ESBLs in the Indian population. The identified risk factors can be used as a guide for empiric antibiotic therapy targeted to these resistant bacteria.