Conceptual foundations of early numeracy: Evidence from infant brain data.

Understanding the conceptual resources that children bring to mathematics learning is crucial for developing effective instruction and interventions. Despite the considerable number of studies examining the neural underpinnings of number representations in adults and the growing number of reports in children, very few studies have examined the neural correlates of the link between foundational resources related to numerical information and symbolic number representations in infants. There is currently an active debate about which foundational resources are critical for symbolic mathematics. Is early numerical discrimination best explained by a holistic and generalized sense of magnitude rather than a number sense? Does early number sense provide the conceptual basis for mapping numerical symbols to their meaning? Are foundational number systems marginal while children learn to count and perform symbolic arithmetic, and only later children map non symbolic representations of numerical magnitudes onto symbols? After describing the mainstream theories of numerical cognition and the sources of controversy, we review recent studies of the neural bases of human infants' numerical performance with the aim of clarifying the link between early conceptual resources and symbolic number systems as children's mathematical minds develop.

Anatomical connectivity in children with developmental dyscalculia: A graph theory study.

Current theories postulate that numerical processing depends upon a brain circuit formed by regions and their connections; specialized in the representation and manipulation of the numerical properties of stimuli. It has been suggested that the damage of these network may cause Developmental Dyscalculia (DD): a persistent neurodevelopmental disorder that significantly interferes with academic performance and daily life activities that require mastery of mathematical notions and operations. However, most of the studies on the brain foundations of DD have focused on regions of interest associated with numerical processing, and have not addressed numerical cognition as a complex network phenomenon. The present study explored DD using a Graph Theory network approach. We studied the association between topological measures of integration and segregation of information processing in the brain proposed by Graph Theory; and individual variability in numerical performance in a group of 11 school-aged children with DD (5 of which presented with comorbidity with Developmental Dyslexia, the specific learning disorder for reading) and 17 typically developing peers. A statistically significant correlation was found between the Weber fraction (a measure of numerical representations' precision) and the Clustering Index (a measure of segregation of information processing) in the whole sample. The DD group showed significantly lower Characteristic Path Length (average shortest path length among all pairs of regions in the brain network) compared to controls. Also, differences in critical regions for the brain network performance (hubs) were found between groups. The presence of limbic hubs characterized the DD brain network while right Temporal and Frontal hubs found in controls were absent in the DD group. Our results suggest that the DD may be associated with alterations in anatomical brain connectivity that hinder the capacity to integrate and segregate numerical information.

Numerical processing profiles in children with varying degrees of arithmetical achievement.

Recent studies show basic cognitive abilities such as the rapid and precise apprehension of small numerosities in object sets ("subitizing"), verbal counting and numerical magnitude comparison significantly influence the acquisition of arithmetic and continues to modulate more advanced stages of mathematical cognition. Additionally, children with low arithmetic achievement (LAA) and Developmental Dyscalculia (DD) exhibit significant deficits in these cognitive processes. Nevertheless, the different cognitive profiles of children with varying degrees of numerical and arithmetic processing deficits have not been sufficiently characterized, despite its potential relevance to the stimulation of numerical cognition and the design of appropriate intervention strategies. Here, the cognitive profiles of groups of typically developing children, children with low arithmetical achievement and DD, exhibiting typical and atypical subitizing ability were contrasted. The results suggest that relatively independent neurocognitive mechanisms may produce distinct profiles at the behavioral level and suggest children with low arithmetic performance exhibiting atypical subitizing abilities are not only significantly slower, but rely on compensatory mechanisms and strategies compared to typical subitizers. The role of subitizing as a correlate of arithmetic fluency is revised in the light of the present findings.

Neurocognitive profiles of learning disabled children with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is a genetic condition generally associated with intellectual deficiency and learning disabilities. Although there have been groundbreaking advances in the understanding of the molecular, cellular, and neural systems underlying learning deficits associated to NF1 in animal models, much remains to be learned about the spectrum of neurocognitive phenotype associated with the NF1 clinical syndrome. In the present study, 32 children with NF1 ranging from 7 to 14 years were evaluated with neurocognitive tests dedicated to assess basic capacities which are involved in reading and mathematical achievement. Deficits in lexical and phonological strategies and poor number facts retrieval were found underlying reading and arithmetic disorders, respectively. Additionally, efficiencies in lexical/phonological strategies and mental arithmetic were significant predictors of individual differences in reading attainment and math. However, deficits in core numeric capacities were not found in the sample, suggesting that it is not responsible for calculation dysfluency. The estimated prevalence of Developmental Dyscalculia was 18.8%, and the male:female ratio was 5:1. On the other hand, the prevalence of Developmental Dyslexia was almost 3 times as high (50%), and no gender differences were found (male: female ratio = 1:1). This study offers new evidence to the neurocognitive phenotype of NF1 contributing to an in depth understanding of this condition, but also to possible treatments for the cognitive deficits associated with NF1.

Numerical capacities as domain-specific predictors beyond early mathematics learning: a longitudinal study.

The first aim of the present study was to investigate whether numerical effects (Numerical Distance Effect, Counting Effect and Subitizing Effect) are domain-specific predictors of mathematics development at the end of elementary school by exploring whether they explain additional variance of later mathematics fluency after controlling for the effects of general cognitive skills, focused on nonnumerical aspects. The second aim was to address the same issues but applied to achievement in mathematics curriculum that requires solutions to fluency in calculation. These analyses assess whether the relationship found for fluency are generalized to mathematics content beyond fluency in calculation. As a third aim, the domain specificity of the numerical effects was examined by analyzing whether they contribute to the development of reading skills, such as decoding fluency and reading comprehension, after controlling for general cognitive skills and phonological processing. Basic numerical capacities were evaluated in children of 3(rd) and 4(th) grades (n=49). Mathematics and reading achievements were assessed in these children one year later. Results showed that the size of the Subitizing Effect was a significant domain-specific predictor of fluency in calculation and also in curricular mathematics achievement, but not in reading skills, assessed at the end of elementary school. Furthermore, the size of the Counting Effect also predicted fluency in calculation, although this association only approached significance. These findings contrast with proposals that the core numerical competencies measured by enumeration will bear little relationship to mathematics achievement. We conclude that basic numerical capacities constitute domain-specific predictors and that they are not exclusively "start-up" tools for the acquisition of Mathematics; but they continue modulating this learning at the end of elementary school.

Symbolic and non-symbolic number magnitude processing in children with developmental dyscalculia.

The aim of this study was to evaluate if children with Developmental Dyscalculia (DD) exhibit a general deficit in magnitude representations or a specific deficit in the connection of symbolic representations with the corresponding analogous magnitudes. DD was diagnosed using a timed arithmetic task. The experimental magnitude comparison tasks were presented in non-symbolic and symbolic formats. DD and typically developing (TD) children showed similar numerical distance and size congruity effects. However, DD children performed significantly slower in the symbolic task. These results are consistent with the access deficit hypothesis, according to which DD children's deficits are caused by difficulties accessing magnitude information from numerical symbols rather than in processing numerosities per se.

Basic numerical capacities and prevalence of developmental dyscalculia: the Havana Survey.

The association of enumeration and number comparison capacities with arithmetical competence was examined in a large sample of children from 2nd to 9th grades. It was found that efficiency on numerical capacities predicted separately more than 25% of the variance in the individual differences on a timed arithmetical test, and this occurred for both younger and older learners. These capacities were also significant predictors of individual variations in an untimed curriculum-based math achievement test and on the teacher scores of math performance over developmental time. Based on these findings, these numerical capacities were used for estimating the prevalence and gender ratio of basic numerical deficits and developmental dyscalculia (DD) over the grade range defined above (N = 11,652 children). The extent to which DD affects the population with poor ability on calculation was also examined. For this purpose, the prevalence and gender ratio of arithmetical dysfluency (AD) were estimated in the same cohort. The estimated prevalence of DD was 3.4%, and the male:female ratio was 4:1. However, the prevalence of AD was almost 3 times as high (9.35%), and no gender differences were found (male:female ratio = 1.07:1). Basic numerical deficits affect 4.54% of school-age population and affect more boys than girls (2.4:1). The differences between the corresponding estimates were highly significant (α < .01). Based on these contrastive findings, it is concluded that DD, defined as a defective sense of numerosity, could be a distinctive disorder that affects only a portion of children with AD.

Bases Biológicas de la Discalculia del desarrollo / Biological basis of Growth dyscalculia

El Trastorno Específico en el Aprendizaje de las Matemáticas o Discalculia del Desarrollo (DD) es un déficit severo, persistente y selectivo en el rendimiento aritmético. Aunque no han sido identificados genes responsables de este trastorno, varias investigaciones realizadas en muestras de sujetos con síndromes genéticos que presentan DD como parte de su perfil cognitivo, han reportado anomalías estructurales y funcionales en el cerebro de los mismos. En este artículo se presenta una revisión de las principales evidencias provenientes de estudios con síndromes genéticos que apoyan la determinación biológica de la Discalculia del Desarrollo…(AU)