Ultra-low-dose computed tomography and chest X-ray in follow-up of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma-a prospective comparative study.

Ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULD-CT) may combine the high sensitivity of conventional computed tomography (CT) in detecting sarcoma pulmonary metastasis, with a radiation dose in the same magnitude as chest X-ray (CXR). Fifty patients with non-metastatic high-grade soft tissue sarcoma treated with curative intention were recruited. Their follow-up involved both CXR and ULD-CT to evaluate their different sensitivity. Suspected findings were confirmed by conventional CT if necessary. Patients with isolated pulmonary metastases were treated with surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with curative intent if possible. The median effective dose from a single ULD-CT study was 0.27 mSv (range 0.12 to 0.89 mSv). Nine patients were diagnosed with asymptomatic lung metastases during the follow-up. Only three of them were visible in CXR and all nine in ULD-CT. CXR had therefore only a 33% sensitivity compared to ULD-CT. Four patients were operated, and one had SBRT to all pulmonary lesions. Eight of them, however, died of the disease. Two patients developed symptomatic metastatic recurrence involving extrapulmonary sites+/-the lungs between two imaging rounds. ULD-CT has higher sensitivity for the detection of sarcoma pulmonary metastasis than CXR, with a radiation dose considerably lower than conventional CT.Clinical trial registration: NCT05813808. 04-14-2023.

Early clinical experience with a degraded 4 MeV electron beam in radiotherapy of superficial basal cell carcinoma.

The most common non-melanoma skin cancer is basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Surgery is the gold standard treatment but also non-surgical alternatives are needed. The purpose of this work was to present the early clinical experiences of degraded 4 MeV electron beam as a treatment method for superficial BCC. Twelve patients underwent two weeks radiation therapy treatment with either 5 × 7 Gy or 2 × 12 Gy. There were no significant differences in treatment outcome with different fractionations or lesion locations. The degraded beam method is a safe and valid non-surgical solution for suitable patients with superficial lesions.

Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast: analysis of diagnostic tools in a registry-based population.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) is a serious late consequence caused by breast cancer treatment. Initial symptoms are often inconspicuous, thus contributing to diagnostic delay. Most previous studies of the diagnostic aspects of RAASB are case reports. PURPOSE: To perform a complete review of the imaging findings and biopsy methods in a nationwide RAASB cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS: RAASB patients were identified from a national cancer registry and additional patients were included from our hospital. All available information from imaging (mammogram [MGR], ultrasound [US], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and computed tomography [CT]) and biopsies was reviewed. The sensitivity of imaging and biopsy methods for detection of RAASB was calculated. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with RAASB were found. Fourteen MGR, 30 US, 24 MRI, and 25 CT studies were available for evaluation. The sensitivity of MGR, US, MRI, and CT for detection of RAASB was 43%, 50%, 92%, and 84%, respectively. Superior sensitivity was demonstrated for punch biopsy (84%) and incisional biopsy (93%) compared to fine-needle aspiration cytology (0%) and core needle biopsy (18%). CONCLUSION: MRI and CT have comparable sensitivity for detection of RAASB, while MGR and US are unreliable. However, negative findings in MRI or CT must be interpreted with caution. Punch biopsy and incisional biopsy are the preferred biopsy methods.

Treatment and Prognosis of Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma in a Nationwide Population.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) is an aggressive malignancy that is increasing in incidence. Only a few previous population-based studies have reported the results of RAASB treatment. METHODS: A search for RAASB patients was carried out in the Finnish Cancer Registry, and treatment data were collected to identify prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: Overall, 50 RAASB patients were identified. The median follow-up time was 5.4 years (range 0.4-15.6), and the 5-year overall survival rate was 69%. Forty-seven (94%) patients were operated on with curative intent. Among these patients, the 5-year local recurrence-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, and overall survival rates were 62%, 75%, and 74%, respectively. A larger planned surgical margin was associated with improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the majority of RAASB patients were eligible for radical surgical management in this population-based analysis. With radical surgery, the prognosis is relatively good.

Radiation-associated sarcoma after breast cancer in a nationwide population: Increasing risk of angiosarcoma.

Radiation-associated sarcoma (RAS) is a rare complication of radiation therapy (RT) to breast cancer (BC). This study explored RAS after RT to BC in a nationwide population-based material. The Finnish Cancer Registry was queried for patients with BC treated during 1953-2014 who were later diagnosed with a secondary sarcoma in 1953-2014. Registry data, patient files, and sarcoma specimens were  analyzed to confirm diagnosis and location of RAS at or close to the RT target volume. A total of 132 512 patients were diagnosed with invasive BC during the study period. A subsequent sarcoma was diagnosed in 355 patients. After exclusion, 96 RAS were identified. Angiosarcoma (AS) was the most prevalent histology in 50 (52%) of 96 patients. However, the first radiation-associated AS was diagnosed in a patient treated for BC with breast-conserving surgery in 1984, and thereafter, the proportion of AS continuously increased. The 5-year sarcoma-specific survival was 75.1% for RAS treated with a curative intent. The distribution of histologic subtypes of RAS has changed during the 60 years of this registry study. The first radiation-associated AS was diagnosed in 1989, and presently, AS is the most common histologic subtype of RAS. It is possible that changes in BC treatment strategies are influencing the characteristics of RAS.