Vonoprazan causes symptomatic improvement in non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan therapy as compared to conventional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or no vonoprazan for non-erosive esophagitis. METHODS: A thorough search was conducted across databases. The primary outcome was to determine the mean variance in the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) score after vonoprazan treatment. Secondary outcomes comprised alterations in the scores for epigastric pain and post-prandial distress, the proportion of patients displaying improvement, and the occurrence of adverse events. Pooled mean differences and relative risks were determined utilizing random effects models. RESULTS: A total of 1,944 articles were screened and nine of them were included. As compared to PPI or no vonoprazan therapy, vonoprazan treatment led to a significant reduction in the GERD score [mean difference: -3.88 (95% CI: -5.48, -2.28), p<0.01, i2=95%]. As compared to PPI or no vonoprazan therapy, vonoprazan treatment led to a significant reduction in the epigastric pain score [mean difference: -3.02 (95% CI: -5.41, -0.63), p=0.01, i2=75%] and post-prandial distress score [mean difference: -2.82 (95% CI: -3.51, -2.12), p<0.01, i2=0%] (all moderate GRADE evidence). Vonoprazan therapy was found to be safe. CONCLUSION: Treatment with vonoprazan could significantly improve symptoms in patients with non-erosive esophagitis or non-erosive GERD.

Sympathetic Neurofunction Testing in Gestational Hypertension and Relationship with Developing Preeclampsia and Eclampsia: Real-world Evidences from Clinical Pharmacology Clinics.

BACKGROUND: Gestational hypertension carries a high-risk for adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, and it can also develop into preeclampsia. A relative decrease in parasympathetic and increase in sympathetic activity has been seen in normal pregnancy which returns to baseline after delivery. The present study aimed to detect any abnormality in sympathetic neurofunction in gestational hypertension and to identify its possible association with the development of preeclampsia/eclampsia. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was carried out among gestational hypertensive patients between 24 and 26 weeks of gestation, who were sent to clinical pharmacology clinics for autonomic neurofunction testing, along with their 24-hour urinary protein testing reports. Preisometric handgrip (IHG) and post-IHG differences in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were noted. The association between Δ DBP and the development of eclampsia/preeclampsia was probed. RESULTS: A total of 52 pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) participants, both multigravida (n = 15) and primigravida (n = 37) were included in one arm (PIH arm), and 52 matched (age and gravida) pregnant women, those do not have PIH included in another arm for comparative analysis. On comparing the PIH arm and normal arm, prehand grip DBP (p ≤ 0.0001), posthand grip DBP, and Δ DBP were significantly higher in the PIH arm. Correlation between Δ DBP and 24 hours' proteinuria was observed in the PIH arm, with a significant positive correlation. CONCLUSION: A high-rise in DBP post-IHG exercise is associated with gestational hypertensive mothers and this rise is strongly correlated with the development of preeclampsia and eclampsia, which suggests that addressing sympathetic hyperactivity could be a potential area to target therapeutics while managing gestational hypertension.

Efficacy and safety of cangrelor as compared to ticagrelor in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of cangrelor as compared to ticagrelor in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent percutaneous intervention. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant head-on-comparison or swapping studies. The primary outcome was the rate of high platelet reactivity (HPR) at specific time intervals after stopping cangrelor infusion during the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes were the risks of thrombosis, all-cause mortality and bleeding. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 1018 studies were screened and eight were included in the analysis. There were four head-on-comparison studies and four swapping studies. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving a high platelet reactivity in swapping studies [OR, 0.71 (95% CI 0.04, 13.87), p = 0.82, i2 = 88%]. In head-on-comparison studies, PRU from Fig. 2B shows there was no significant reduction in high platelet reactivity [mean difference - 77.83 (95% CI - 238.84, 83.18), p < 0.001, i2 = 100%]. PRU results from (Fig. 2C) show a mean difference of 7.38 (95% CI - 29.74, 44.51), p < 0.001, i2 = 97%. There was no significant difference in the risks of thrombosis [OR, 0.91 (95% CI 0.20, 4.13), p = 0.81, i2 = 0%], all-cause mortality [OR, 3.52 (95% CI 0.44, 27.91), p = 0.24, i2 = 26%] and bleeding [OR, 0.89 (95% CI 0.37, 2.17), p = 0.93, i2 = 0%] between the two groups as revealed in the head-on-comparison studies. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety profiles of cangrelor and ticagrelor were similar in patients with STEMI.

Real-world Clinical Effectiveness on Glycaemic Parameters, Safety and Additional Benefits of Glargine U300 (Toujeo®) Initiation after Oral Antidiabetic Drug Failure in Insulin-naïve Patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Background: Several studies have proved the advantages of second-generation insulin analogs in lowering intra-individual variability in plasma insulin levels, flexibility in dosing, a sustained glucose-lowering effect, and decreasing the risk of hypoglycemia. Glargine 300 is one of the newer second-generation basal insulin analogs to have been approved for both type 1 and 2 diabetes. The present study aims to assess the real-world clinical effectiveness and safety of Glargine U300 (Toujeo®) initiation after oral antidiabetic drug failure in insulin-naïve patients with T2DM. Methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted where participants were interviewed regarding their basic demographics, body weight, and treatment details. Glycemic parameters (HbA1C%, Fasting Plasma Glucose, and Post Prandial Blood Glucose) were observed in the initial 6 months, and changes were noted and compared. Any hypoglycemic events or other complications were also noted. Data collected were statistically analyzed. Results: The study included a total of 188 patients. Treatment with glargine 300 significantly reduced the mean HbA1C level from 9.78% at baseline to 7.90% at the end of 6 months of treatment (p < 0.001). 10.60% of patients achieved the glycemic target of ≤7.0% by the end of 6 months, while only 6.90% were within the target range at baseline. Similarly, significant reduction in FPG was observed at the end of 6 months treatment period with Glargine U300. A significant increase in dose requirement was observed throughout the study phase (p < 0.001). Incidence of hypoglycemia was noted in 2.12% of subjects. Conclusion: The lower incidence statistics of hypoglycemia coupled with sustained positive glycemic effects, stands out to be a prominent advantage of Glargine U300 over its other congeners.

Role of semaglutide in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 24 weeks of semaglutide treatment in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant studies. The primary outcome was the change in the serum alanine transaminase level. The secondary outcomes were changes in liver stiffness, liver function test parameters, metabolic parameters, and safety. Pooled mean differences and relative risks were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Six hundred studies were screened and eight were included (n = 2413). Semaglutide treatment showed a reduction in serum alanine transaminase [mean difference: 14.07 U/L (95% CI: 19.39 to -8.75); p < 0.001] and aspartate transaminase [mean difference: 6.89 U/L (95% CI: 9.14 to -4.63); p < 0.001] levels. There was a significant improvement in liver fat content [mean difference: 4.97% (95% CI: 6.65 to -3.29); p < 0.001] and liver stiffness [mean difference: 0.96 kPa (95% CI: 1.87 to -0.04); p = 0.04]. There were significant improvements in the glycated hemoglobin level and the lipid profile. However, the risk of serious adverse events [relative risk: 1.54 (95% CI: 1.02 to 2.34); p = 0.04] was high following semaglutide treatment as compared to placebo; the most common ones were gastrointestinal (nausea and vomiting, dyspepsia, decreased appetite, constipation, and diarrhea) and gallbladder-related diseases. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 24 weeks of semaglutide could significantly improve liver enzymes, reduce liver stiffness, and improve metabolic parameters in patients with NAFLD/NASH. However, the gastrointestinal adverse effects could be a major concern.

Effects of saroglitazar in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4 mg saroglitazar treatment in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, medRxiv (pre-print), bioRxiv (pre-print), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant studies. The primary outcome was the change in the serum alanine transaminase (ALT) level. The secondary outcomes were changes in liver stiffness, liver function test parameters, and metabolic parameters. Pooled mean differences were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Of 331 studies that were screened, ten were included. Treatment with adjunct saroglitazar showed a reduction in ALT [mean difference: 26.01 U/L (95% CI: 10.67 to 41.35); p = 0.009; i2: 98%; moderate GRADE evidence] and aspartate transaminase [mean difference: 19.68 U/L (95% CI: 8.93 to 30.43); p<0.001; i2: 97%; moderate GRADE evidence] levels. There was a significant improvement in liver stiffness [mean difference: 2.22 kPa (95% CI: 0.80 to 3.63); p = 0.002; i2: 99%; moderate GRADE evidence]. There were significant improvements in glycated hemoglobin [mean difference: 0.59% (95% CI: 0.32 to 0.86); p<0.001; i2: 78%; moderate GRADE evidence], total cholesterol [mean difference: 19.20 (95% CI: 1.54 to 36.87); p = 0.03; i2: 95%; moderate GRADE evidence], and triglyceride [mean difference: 105.49 mg/dL (95% CI: 11.18 to 199.80); p = 0.03; i2: 100%; moderate GRADE evidence] levels. Saroglitazar treatment was safe. CONCLUSION: Treatment with adjunct 4 mg saroglitazar could significantly improve liver enzymes, reduce liver stiffness, and improve metabolic parameters (serum glucose and lipid profile) in patients with NAFLD or NASH.

Effectiveness of budesonide formoterol fixed-dose combination MDI in reducing cough symptoms in COVID-19 patients: A real-world evidence study.

Background: Cough is a wearisome and exasperating symptom affecting the daily life of the infected patient. Cough due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes excessive morbidity in human populations globally. Apart from the morbidity associated with cough, it also enhances the transmission of this viral infection through droplets. Therefore, curbing cough is crucial to limit its spread. Patients often administer over-the-counter products and antitussive agents, which have no proven benefit. The present study was undertaken to find out if cough associated with COVID-19 and other indicative clinical outcomes is alleviated with a budesonide/formoterol fixed-dose combination (FDC) metered-dose inhaler (MDI). Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in mild COVID-19 patients who presented with a cough score ≥8 at presentation. Patients who were initiated on ICS-LABA MDI were observed as group A and those who were not initiated on MDI were observed as Group B. Cough symptom score (at baseline and on day 3 and day 7), the incidence of hospital admission and/or death, and need for mechanical ventilation were documented. Prescribing patterns of anti-cough medications were also noted and analysed. Results: Compared to group B, a higher mean cough score reduction was noted for group A patients at day 3 and day 7 when compared to the baseline, and this was significant at P < 0.001. A significant negative correlation was also observed between mean latency of MDI initiation from the symptom onset and mean cough score reduction. Analysis of the proportion of patients prescribed medications to treat cough showed that overall, 10.78% did not require these, with a greater proportion in group A compared to group B. Conclusion: Patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) COVID-19 who were treated with ICS-LABA MDI along with usual care benefitted significantly in terms of symptom reduction compared to usual care.

Efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone, a new Thiazolidinedione, as compared to the standard of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone as compared to the standard of care (SOC) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the comparison of the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level after 24 weeks. Pooled mean differences and odds ratios were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Of 267 studies that were screened, four were included. Treatment with adjunct lobeglitazone showed a reduction in the HbA1C level [mean difference: -0.23% (95% CI: -0.62 to 0.16); p = 0.24; i2: 87%; moderate GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and. Evaluation) of evidence], fasting blood glucose level [mean difference: -7.12 mg/dl (95% CI: -20.09 to 5.85); p = 0.28; i2: 87%; moderate GRADE of evidence], and lipid profile as compared to those following treatment with the SOC; however, the changes were not statistically significant. The risk of hypoglycemia was significantly lower [odds ratio: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.70); p < 0.05; i2: 0%; moderate GRADE of evidence] without any significant difference in the risk of drug-related adverse events [odds ratio: 1.59 (95% CI: 0.87 to 2.93); p = 0.13; i2: 0%; moderate GRADE of evidence] following treatment with lobeglitazone as compared to those following treatment with the SOC. CONCLUSION: Treatment with adjunct lobeglitazone showed changes in the blood glycemic status and lipid profile similar to SOC in patients with T2DM, and the results were not statistically significant. Lobeglitazone was well tolerated; its safety profile was comparable to SOC.

Association between Polypharmacy and Cardiovascular Autonomic Function among Elderly Patients in an Urban Municipality Area of Kolkata, India: A Record-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

We assessed the association between polypharmacy and cardiovascular autonomic function among community-dwelling elderly patients having chronic diseases. Three hundred and twenty-one patients from an urban municipality area of Kolkata, India were studied in August 2022. The anticholinergic burden and cardiac autonomic function (Valsalva ratio, orthostatic hypotension, change in diastolic blood pressure after an isometric exercise, and heart rate variability during expiration and inspiration) were evaluated. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to find out the association of polypharmacy and total anticholinergic burden with cardiac autonomic neuropathy. A total of 305 patients (age, 68.9 ± 3.4; 65.9% male) were included. Of these patients, 81 (26.6%) were on polypharmacy. Out of these 81 patients, 42 patients were on ninety-eight potential inappropriate medications. The anticholinergic burden and the proportion of patients with cardiac autonomic neuropathy were significantly higher among patients who were on polypharmacy than those who were not (8.1 ± 2.3 vs. 2.3 ± 0.9; p = 0.03 and 56.8% vs. 44.6%; p = 0.01). The presence of polypharmacy and a total anticholinergic burden of > 3 was significantly associated with cardiac autonomic neuropathy (aOR, 2.66; 95% CI, 0.91−3.98 and aOR, 2.51; 95% CI, 0.99−3.52, respectively). Thus, polypharmacy was significantly associated with cardiac autonomic neuropathy among community-dwelling elderly patients.

Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine for Chemo-Prophylaxis of COVID-19: A Questionnaire Survey of Perception and Prescribing Practice of Physicians vis-a-vis Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Chemoprophylaxis (CP) along with masking and physical distancing seem an undeniable alternative. Considering the significant but uncertain role of CP for the current COVID-19 pandemic situation, we aimed to determine the various aspects of CP prescribing practices among physicians across India. METHODS: An online survey was conducted among prescribing physicians across India where physicians were assessed for their prescribing practices on COVID-19 CP. Responses to the questionnaire were obtained via telephone, email and WhatsApp messages. Responses were duly analyzed thereafter. RESULT: Ivermectin was the preffered choice in 44% individuals followed by hydroxychloroquine in 34% individuals. Odds of COVID contact among those using HCQ and / or IVR prophylaxis was less than 1 of which IVR was found more protective. The present study also made a survey among 309 community dwellers, where odds of contacted COVID among those with any prophylaxis was 0.46 times than those without any prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: The HCPs found IVR to have a greater risk reduction than with HCQ; while the combination showed the greatest reduction and lack of CP use was associated with a high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Deprescribing for Better Patient Outcomes in Chronic Long Term Care and Role of Clinical Pharmacological Review.

Prescribing is always a risky proposition with a varied degree of vulnerability embedded in the act. It is therefore important to do a perfect balancing in favor of benefit against harm. Deprescribing is the planned and supervised process of dose reduction or stopping of prescribed medications, aimed at correcting inappropriate polypharmacy and improving patient outcomes. Informed reconciliation for potential deprescribing need should be a norm in all patients receiving many medications for multiple chronic comorbidities and is best done in partnership with the prescribing physician. Judicious deprescribing through clinical pharmacological review ensures better patient outcomes. We present here a case series from our experience in clinical pharmacology outpatients' department (OPD), highlighting how de-prescribing helps achieving better patient outcomes.

Effect of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on COVID-19 outcome: A Record Based Observational Study in West Bengal.

BACKGROUND: Since its first identification in December 2019, in WUHAN (CHINA), SARS-COV-2, causative agent of Corona virus pandemic, has affected millions of people worldwide, causing thousands of death. There is much speculation about the interplay between ACEI/ARB and Corona virus infection, as for internalization into host cell SARS-COV-2 binds through S spike protein to ACE-2, aided TMPRSS2. METHODS: A record based observational study has been conducted (data obtained from the clinics of fourteen physicians) in two worst affected districts of West Bengal, to find out the association of ACEI/ARB on patients, suffering from Corona virus infection. The study-protocol has already been approved by Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine. (IEC Ref. No: CREC-STM/2020-AS-37) Results: Increasing age, male sex and presence of co-morbidities (viz. Diabetes, COPD) are significantly associated with the occurrence of moderate and severe disease. Drugs (viz. ACEI/ARB), though are associated with less severe disease, have not achieved statistical significance, in the present study. CONCLUSION: Drugs, like ACEI/ARB, should be continued in patients suffering from COVID-19 infection, (if they are already on these drugs).

Risk Benefit Analysis in Reference to use of LMWH in COVID-19.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are frequent cardiovascular and/or respiratory complications among hospitalized patients of COVID-19 infection. A relatively high mortality of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is worrying, and the application of heparin in COVID-19 has been assessed and recommended with some expert consensus because of the risk of DIC and venous thromboembolism. However, "Risk Benefit Analysis" on the aspect of safety in using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in COVID-19 patients for thrombosis prophylaxis has been explained below with a few case studies and detailed information from various clinical evidence. COVID-19 infection has been associated with inflammation and a prothrombotic state, with increase in fibrin, fibrin degradation products, fibrinogen, and D-dimers. Heparin treatment including unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin appears to be associated with better prognosis in severe COVID-19 patients with coagulopathy. Major studies since the onset of this pandemic, found better prognosis in severe COVID-19 patients meeting SIC criteria or with markedly elevated D-dimer, by approaching thrombosis prophylaxis with LMWH.