Analysis of Utility Assessment Scores to Objectify the Health Burden Caused by Breast Conservation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Lumpectomy followed by radiation, known as breast conservation therapy (BCT), is a viable surgical treatment option for early-stage breast cancer. However, the current literature suggests that patients prefer mastectomy over BCT, likely due to the wide variety of postmastectomy reconstructive options. Our aim is to investigate the objective health burden of living with BCT to help surgeons gain a better understanding of patient treatment preferences. METHODS: Three validated health state utility tools were used to objectify the burden of living with post-BCT results: visual analogue scale (VAS), time trade-off (TTO), and standard gamble (SG). A prospective sample of the general population and medical students were recruited, and their responses analyzed to attain these scores. RESULTS: Utility scores for living with BCT are VAS 0.81 ± 0.19, TTO 0.93 ± 0.10, and SG 0.92 ± 0.14. The TTO and SG suggest a willingness to trade 2.5 years of life years and an 8% chance of death undergoing reconstructive procedures to correct a BCT defect, respectively. Age, gender, race, education, and income were not statistically significant independent predictors for higher or lower utility scores. CONCLUSION: The impact of the health burden of BCT was ascertained using validated objective numeric utility scores. These indices demonstrate a willingness to trade less life years to undergo correction of a BCT defect than reconstruction following unilateral mastectomy. They can provide surgeons with the best objective understanding of patient preferences for shared decision-making in the management of breast cancer.

HISTORIQUE: La lumpectomie suivie d'une radiothérapie, ou conservation mammaire (CM), est un traitement chirurgical viable du cancer du sein précoce. Selon les publications, les patients préfèrent toutefois la mastectomie à la CM, probablement en raison du large éventail de possibilités de reconstructions après la mastectomie. Les chercheurs visent à explorer le fardeau objectif d'une vie avec une CM pour la santé, afin d'aider les chirurgiens à mieux comprendre les préférences des patientes en matière de traitement. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont utilisé trois outils utilitaires validés sur l'état de santé pour objectiver le fardeau de la vie après une CM : l'échelle visuelle analogique (ÉVA), l'arbitrage temporel (AT) et le pari standard (PS). Ils ont recruté un échantillon prospectif de la population générale et d'étudiants en médecine et ont analysé leurs réponses pour obtenir les scores. RÉSULTATS: Les scores d'utilité d'une vie avec une CM s'établissent comme suit : ÉVA 0,81 ± 0,19, AT 0,93 ± 0,10 et PS 0,92 ± 0,14. L'AT et le PS indiquent respectivement la volonté de perdre 2,5 années de vie et d'accroître le risque de décès de 8 % pendant les interventions de reconstruction pour corriger une anomalie de CM. L'âge, le genre, la race, l'instruction et le revenu n'étaient pas des prédicteurs indépendants statistiquement significatifs des scores d'utilité plus élevés ou plus faibles. CONCLUSION: Les chercheurs ont évalué les répercussions du fardeau de la CM sur la santé au moyen de scores d'utilité numériques validés. Ces indices démontrent la volonté de réduire le nombre d'années de vie pour corriger une anomalie de la CM plutôt qu'une reconstruction après une mastectomie unilatérale. Ils peuvent aider les chirurgiens à mieux comprendre les préférences des patientes pour parvenir à une décision commune en matière de prise en charge du cancer du sein.

Prospective, Double-Blind Evaluation of Umbilicoplasty Techniques Using Conventional and Crowdsourcing Methods.

BACKGROUND: Umbilical reconstruction is an important component of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. This study evaluated the aesthetics of three different umbilical reconstruction techniques during DIEP flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: From January to April of 2013, a total of 29 consecutive patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction were randomized intraoperatively to receive one of three umbilicoplasty types: a diamond, an oval, or an inverted V incision. Independent plastic surgeons and members of the general public, identified using an online "crowdsourcing" platform, evaluated aesthetic outcomes in a blinded fashion. Reviewers were shown postoperative photographs of the umbilicus of all patients and a four-point Likert scale was used to rate the new umbilicus on the size, scar formation, shape, localization, and overall appearance. RESULTS: Results for the focus group of independent plastic surgeons and 377 members of the public were retrieved (n = 391). A total of 10 patients (34.5 percent) were randomized into having the diamond incision, 10 (34.5 percent) had the oval incision, and nine (31.0 percent) had the inverted V incision. Patients were well matched in terms of overall characteristics. The general public demonstrated a significant preference for the oval incision in all five parameters. There was no preference identified among surgeons. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that a sample of the U.S. general public prefers the aesthetics of the oval umbilicoplasty incision, which contrasted with the lack of preference identified within this focus group of plastic surgeons. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Mastopexy for breast ptosis: Utility outcomes of population preferences.

BACKGROUND: Breast ptosis can occur with aging, and after weight loss and breastfeeding. Mastopexy is a procedure used to modify the size, contour and elevation of sagging breasts without changing breast volume. To gain more knowledge on the health burden of living with breast ptosis requiring mastectomy, validated measures can be used to compare it with other health states. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the health state utility assessment of individuals living with breast ptosis who could benefit from a mastopexy procedure; and to determine whether utility scores vary according to participant demographics. METHODS: Utility assessments using a visual analogue scale (VAS), time trade-off (TTO) and standard gamble (SG) methods were used to obtain utility scores for breast ptosis, monocular blindness and binocular blindness from a sample of the general population and medical students. Linear regression and the Student's t test were used for statistical analysis; P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Mean (± SD) measures for breast ptosis in the 107 volunteers (VAS: 0.80±0.14; TTO: 0.87±0.18; SG: 0.90±0.14) were significantly different (P<0.0001) from the corresponding measures for monocular blindness and binocular blindness. When compared with a sample of the general population, having a medical education demonstrated a statistically significant difference in being less likely to trade years of life and less likely to gamble risk of a procedure such as a mastopexy. Race and sex were not statistically significant independent predictors of risk acceptance. DISCUSSION: For the first time, the burden of living with breast ptosis requiring surgical intervention was determined using validated metrics (ie, VAS, TTO and SG). The health burden of living with breast ptosis was found to be comparable with that of breast hypertrophy, unilateral mastectomy, bilateral mastectomy, and cleft lip and palate. Furthermore, breast ptosis was considered to be closer to 'perfect health' than monocular blindness, binocular blindness, facial disfigurement requiring face transplantation surgery, unilateral facial paralysis and severe lower extremity lymphedema. CONCLUSIONS: Quantifying the health burden of living with breast ptosis requiring mastopexy indicated that is comparable with other breast-related conditions (breast hypertrophy and bilateral mastectomy). Numerical values have been assigned to this health state (VAS: 0.80±0.14; TTO: 0.87±0.18; and SG: 0.90±0.14), which can be used to form comparisons with the health burden of living with other disease states.

HISTORIQUE: La ptose mammaire découle du vieillissement, d'une perte de poids et de l'allaitement. La mastopexie est une intervention utilisée pour modifier la taille, le contour et l'élévation des seins affaissés sans en modifier le volume. Pour en savoir plus sur le fardeau d'une ptose mammaire exigeant une mastectomie sur la santé, on peut utiliser des mesures validées pour la comparer à d'autres états de santé. OBJECTIF: Quantifier l'évaluation utilitaire de l'état de santé des personnes qui présentent une ptose mammaire et qui profiteraient d'une mastopexie et déterminer si les scores d'utilité varient selon la démographie des participants. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont utilisé des évaluations utilitaires au moyen d'une échelle analogique visuelle (ÉAV), de l'arbitrage temporel (AT) et de la méthode du pari standard (PS) pour obtenir les scores d'utilité de la ptose mammaire, de la cécité monoculaire et de la cécité binoculaire d'un échantillon de la population générale et d'étudiants dans une profession médicale. La régression linéaire et le test t de Student ont été utilisés pour l'analyse statistique. P<0,05 était considéré comme statistiquement significatif. RÉSULTATS: Les mesures moyennes (± ÉT) de la ptose mammaire de 107 volontaires (ÉAV : 0,80±0,14, AT : 0,87±0,18, PS : 0,90±0,14) étaient statistiquement différentes (P<0,0001) des mesures correspondantes de cécité monoculaire et de cécité binoculaire. Par rapport à un échantillon en population, des connaissances médicales démontraient une différence statistiquement significative dans la moins grande susceptibilité à échanger des années de vie et à parier sur le risque d'une intervention comme la mastopexie. La race et le sexe n'étaient pas statistiquement significatifs, quels que soient les prédicteurs d'acceptation du risque. EXPOSÉ: Pour la première fois, le fardeau de la ptose mammaire exigeant une intervention chirurgicale a été établi au moyen de mesures validées (ÉAV, AT et PS). Ainsi, le fardeau de la ptose mammaire sur la santé était comparable à celui de l'hypertrophie mammaire, de la mastectomie unilatérale, de la mastectomie bilatérale et de la fente labiopalatine. Par ailleurs, la ptose mammaire était considérée comme plus près de la « santé parfaite ¼ que la cécité monoculaire, la cécité binoculaire, la défiguration exigeant une transplantation faciale, une paralysie faciale unilatérale et un lymphœdème des membres inférieurs. CONCLUSIONS: La quantification du fardeau de la ptose mammaire exigeant une mastopexie sur la santé est comparable à d'autres problèmes mammaires (hypertrophie mammaire et mastectomie bilatérale). Des valeurs numériques ont été attribuées à cet état de santé (ÉAV : 0,80±0,14, AT : 0,87±0,18 et PS : 0,90±0,14), et peuvent être utilisées pour former des comparaisons avec le fardeau d'autres états pathologiques sur la santé.

Nipple-areolar Complex Reconstruction following Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Utility Assessment Study.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-areola complex (NAC) reconstruction occurs toward the final stage of breast reconstruction; however, not all women follow through with these procedures. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of the health state burden of living with a reconstructed breast before NAC reconstruction. METHODS: A sample of the population and medical students at McGill University were recruited to establish the utility scores [visual analog scale (VAS), time trade-off (TTO), and standard gamble (SG)] of living with an NAC deformity. Utility scores for monocular and binocular blindness were determined for validation and comparison. Linear regression and Student's t test were used for statistical analysis, and significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: There were 103 prospective volunteers included. Utility scores (VAS, TTO, and SG) for NAC deformity were 0.84 ± 0.18, 0.92 ± 0.11, and 0.92 ± 0.11, respectively. Age, gender, and ethnicity were not statistically significant independent predictors of utility scores. Income thresholds of <$10,000 and >$10,000 revealed a statistically significant difference for VAS (P = 0.049) and SG (P = 0.015). Linear regression analysis showed that medical education was directly proportional to the SG and TTO scores (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The absence of NAC in a reconstructed breast can be objectively assessed using utility scores (VAS, 0.84 ± 0.18; TTO, 0.92 ± 0.11; SG, 0.92 ± 0.11). In comparison to prior reported conditions, the quality of life in patients choosing to undergo NAC reconstruction is similar to that of persons living with a nasal deformity or an aging neck requiring rejuvenation.

Patient selection optimization following combined abdominal procedures: analysis of 4925 patients undergoing panniculectomy/abdominoplasty with or without concurrent hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Massive weight loss following bariatric surgery causes unwanted excess skin and subcutaneous tissue. Intraoperative abdominal wall exposure during abdominal contouring surgery provides the possibility for concurrent ventral, umbilical, or inguinal hernia repair. The authors evaluated the incidence of postoperative complications following abdominal contouring surgery with or without concurrent hernia repair and the impact of surgical specialty. METHODS: Analysis of patients undergoing abdominal contouring surgery with or without concurrent hernia repair was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2005 to 2011. The incidence of postoperative complications was determined. Logistic regression assessed influence of demographics and comorbidities on postoperative outcomes. Control group (body mass index > 27.5) and high-risk group (body mass index > 40) undergoing a hernia repair were also included for comparison. RESULTS: Among 4925 patients, 63.7 percent underwent abdominoplasty and/or panniculectomy only; 36.3 percent underwent a simultaneous hernia repair. The abdominal contouring surgery with simultaneous hernia repair group had a higher complication rate than the abdominal contouring surgery group (18.3 percent versus 9.8 percent, p < 0.001). Body mass index was associated with increased wound complications and major complications in both groups. Diabetes, smoking, chronic steroid use, and hypertension increased wound complications in the abdominal contouring surgery/hernia repair group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing hernia repair with abdominal contouring surgery may have higher postoperative complication rates than after abdominal contouring surgery alone. Hypertension, smoking, and chronic steroid use were predictors for negative outcomes. Furthermore, surgical specialty is associated with significantly different complication rates. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

The ideal nasolabial angle in rhinoplasty: a preference analysis of the general population.

BACKGROUND: In aesthetic rhinoplasty, the described ideal nasolabial angle ranges from 90 to 120 degrees, with variable anthropologic differences. The authors sought to verify the most aesthetic nasolabial angle as specifically perceived by a random prospective sample of the general population and determine whether age, sex, race, and education were independent associated predictors. METHODS: The authors prospectively recruited 98 random volunteers from the general population. They were asked to rank three different nasolabial angles for the female nose (100, 105, and 110 degrees) and the male nose (90, 100, and 105 degrees) as "most," "moderately," and "least aesthetic." Demographic data were used to determine correlations between aesthetic preferences. Pearson chi-square test and t test were used to determine statistical significance RESULTS: The most aesthetic female nasolabial angle was 104.9±4.0 degrees. The most aesthetic male nasolabial angle was 97.0±6.3 degrees. Male subjects, younger volunteers, Native Americans, and African Americans preferred more acute male nasolabial angles (90 degrees). Female subjects, volunteers older than 50 years, college graduates, those with a previous rhinoplasty, and Caucasian and Asian subjects preferred more obtuse male nasolabial angles. CONCLUSIONS: In the authors' sample of the general population, the ideal and most aesthetic nasolabial angle ranged from 100.9 to 108.9 degrees in the female nose and 90.7 to 103.3 degrees in the male nose. Age, sex, race, education, and having undergone a previous rhinoplasty were predictors of differences in the ideal male nasolabial angle but did not change preference of the female nasolabial angle.

Population preferences of undergoing brachioplasty for arm laxity.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients requesting surgical procedures performed for brachioplasty and massive weight loss is increasing. The authors set out to quantify the health state utility outcome assessment of living with arm deformity requiring brachioplasty. METHODS: Utility assessments using the visual analog scale (VAS), time trade-off (TTO), and standard gamble (SG) were used to obtain utilities scores for arm deformity, monocular blindness, and binocular blindness from a sample of the general population and medical students. Linear regression and Student t test were used for statistical analysis. A P value less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. RESULTS: All the measures for arm deformity of the 107 volunteers (VAS, 0.80 ± 0.14; TTO, 0.91 ± 0.12; SG, 0.94 ± 0.10) were significantly different (P < 0.001) from the corresponding measures for monocular blindness and binocular blindness. When compared to the sample of the general population, having a medical education demonstrated a statistical significance of being less likely to trade years of life and less likely to gamble risk of death for a procedure such as a brachioplasty. Race and sex were not statistically significant independent predictors of risk acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: We have objectified the health state of living with upper arm deformity requiring brachioplasty. Utility outcome scores (VAS, 0.80 ± 0.14; TTO, 0.91 ± 0.12; SG, 0.94 ± 0.10) were comparable to living with health states such as aging neck needing rejuvenation, excess skin in the thighs necessitating thigh lift, and massive weight loss requiring panniculectomy based on previously reported studies.

Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix.

BACKGROUND: The use of acellular dermal matrices has become increasingly popular in immediate and delayed tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction. However, it is unclear whether their use is associated with increased postoperative complication rates. Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, the authors assessed baseline differences in demographics and comorbidities with and without acellular dermal matrix and determined whether postoperative complication rates varied. METHODS: Using the national surgical database (2005 to 2011), tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction cases were extracted using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Differences in preoperative demographics and comorbidities were assessed using chi-square and t test analysis using SPSS. The authors analyzed variations in complication rates and determined whether demographics and comorbidities affected outcomes using multivariate logistical analysis. A post hoc power study was calculated. RESULTS: Of 19,100 cases, 3301 involved acellular dermal matrix use. Overall complication rates were not statistically significant (acellular dermal matrix, 5.3 percent; non-acellular dermal matrix, 4.9 percent; p=0.396). Several risk factors were statistically significant associated factors of complications. Higher body mass index was associated with wound complications in both cohorts. In the non-acellular dermal matrix group, body mass index, smoking, and diabetes were associated with major complications, and radiotherapy and steroid use with minor complications. CONCLUSIONS: Acellular dermal matrix use did not appear to increase complication rates in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction in this survey of a national surgical database. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the acellular dermal matrix and non-acellular dermal matrix groups. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Utility outcome assessment of the aging neck following massive weight loss.

OBJECTIVE: The authors set out to quantify the health state utility assessment of living with the physical appearance of the aging neck following massive weight loss. Described utility scores may help to establish the health burden of the aging neck in the growing bariatric patient population. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three validated tools were used to determine utility scores for living with an aging neck: visual analog scale (VAS), time trade-off (TTO), and standard gamble (SG). A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate the subjects' ease of understanding. A prospective sample of volunteers from the general population and medical students was used for this assessment. RESULTS: In total, 118 prospective volunteers were included in the survey. All measures (VAS, TTO, SG); (0.89 ± 0.07, 0.94 ± 0.08, and 0.95 ± 0.10, respectively) varied (P < .0001) from the corresponding ones for monocular blindness (0.62 ± 0.18, 0.87 ± 0.15, and 0.85 ± 0.20, respectively) and binocular blindness (0.32 ± 0.18, 0.66 ± 0.25, and 0.64 ± 0.28, respectively). CONCLUSION: The authors objectified the health state of living with an aging neck in the massive weight loss patient with utility scores (TTO, 0.94) comparable with those living with obstructive sleep apnea. This sample population, if faced with an aging neck following massive weight loss, would undertake a neck rejuvenation procedure with a theoretical 5% chance of mortality and would be willing to trade 2.1 years of remaining life-years to attain this procedure.

Utility scores for facial disfigurement requiring facial transplantation [outcomes article].

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists as to whether the benefits of facial transplantation outweigh the risk of continuous immunosuppression. Utility scores [range, 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health)] are a standardized tool with which to objectify health states or diseases and can help answer such controversy. METHODS: An Internet-based utility assessment study using visual analogue scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble was used to obtain utilities for facial disfigurement requiring facial transplantation from a sample of the general population and medical students at McGill University. Average utility scores were compared using t test, and linear regression was performed using age, race, and education as independent predictors of each of the utility scores. RESULT: A total of 307 people participated in the study. All measures (visual analogue scale, time trade off, and standard gamble) for facial disfigurement (0.46 + or - 0.02, 0.68 + or - 0.03, and 0.66 + or - 0.03, respectively) were significantly different (p < 0.001) from the corresponding ones for monocular blindness (0.62 + or - 0.02, 0.83 + or - 0.02, and 0.82 + or - 0.02, respectively) and binocular blindness (0.33 + or - 0.02, 0.62 + or - 0.03, and 0.61 + or - 0.03, respectively). Age was inversely proportional to the utility scores in all groups (p < 0.01), decreasing a utility score of 0.006 for every increase in year of age. CONCLUSION: A sample of the general population and medical students, if faced with facial disfigurement, would undergo a face transplant procedure with a 34 percent chance of death and be willing to trade 12 years of their life to attain perfect health.