[A longitudinal study of apathy in patients with Alzheimer's disease]. / Estudio longitudinal de la apatía en pacientes con enfermedad de Alzheimer.

INTRODUCTION: Apathy is the most common behavioral symptom in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of apathy in patients with mild AD and at 12 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Longitudinal study in patients with AD assessed with Cambridge-Cognitive Revised (CAMCOG-R), Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Sociodemographic variables were collected using a structured interview. The apathy NPI score was taken in to account in the study when it was equal or more than 4. RESULTS: The sample size consisted of 155 subjects with a mean age of 77.1 +/- 6.7 years, and there were more women than men (67.7% vs. 32.3%). The prevalence of apathy was 18.7%. After 12 months persistence was 51.7% and remission was 48.3%. The emergence was 21.4%. Significant differences were seen in CAMCOG-R (p = 0,001), DAD (p < 0,001) and NPI (p < 0,001) between patients with or without apathy. The presence of apathy symptoms was not associated with age or gender but it affects to the course of initiative and executive functions and the NPI total scores. CONCLUSION: The apathy increases with the severity of the AD, and it has been associated with a poorer initiative and executive function ability. With respect to the baseline visit, an increased of NPI total score was observed when an increased apathy NPI score is observed.

Estudio longitudinal de la apatía en pacientes con enfermedad de Alzheimer / A longitudinal study of apathy in patients with alzheimer's disease

Introducción. Uno de los trastornos conductuales más frecuentes en la enfermedad de Alzheimer (EA) es la apatía. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la prevalencia de apatía en pacientes con EA en fases iniciales y su evolución tras 12 meses de seguimiento. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio observacional longitudinal en pacientes con EA. Se administró el Cambridge-Cognitive Revised (CAMCOG-R), la Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) y el inventario neuropsiquiátrico (NPI), y se recogieron de manera estructurada las características sociodemográficas. Se valoró la presencia de apatía en pacientes con una puntuación en la subescala del NPI mayor o igual a 4 puntos. Resultados. La muestra estuvo formada por 155 pacientes,con una media de edad de 77,1 ± 6,7 años, y un 67,7% fueron mujeres. La prevalencia de apatía fue del 18,7%; a los 12 meses, la persistencia fue del 51,7% y la remisión, del 48,3%. La incidencia fue del 21,4%. Se observaron diferencias en el momento basal entre los pacientes con y sin apatía en el CAMCOG-R (p = 0,001), en la DAD (p < 0,001) y en el NPI (p < 0,001). Al año no se observaron diferencias según edad ni sexo. Según los índices de variación porcentual, a los 12 meses se observaron diferencias en la iniciativa y ejecución funcional y en el NPI. Conclusiones. La apatía aumenta con la evolución de la EA, a la vez que se asocia a mayor discapacidad funcional, sobre todo en iniciativa y capacidad ejecutiva. Se observó un aumentode la puntuación de las otras subescalas del NPI asociado al incremento de la apatía

Introduction. Apathy is the most common behavioral symptom in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of apathy in patients with mild AD and at 12 months. Patients and methods. Longitudinal study in patients with AD assessed with Cambridge-Cognitive Revised (CAMCOG-R), Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Sociodemographic variables were collected using a structured interview. The apathyNPI score was taken in to account in the study when it was equal or more than 4. Results. The sample size consisted of 155 subjects with a mean age of 77.1 ± 6.7 years, and there were more women than men (67.7% vs. 32.3%). The prevalence of apathy was 18.7%. After 12 months persistence was 51.7% and remission was 48.3%. The emergence was 21.4%. Significant differences were seen in CAMCOG-R (p = 0,001), DAD (p < 0,001) and NPI (p < 0,001) between patients with or without apathy. The presence of apathy symptoms was not associated with age or gender but it affects to the course of initiative and executive functions and the NPI total scores. Conclusion. The apathy increases with the severity of the AD, and it has been associated with a poorer initiative and executive function ability. With respect to the baseline visit, an increased of NPI totalscore was observed when an increased apathy NPI score is observed

[Factorial distribution of the burden on caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease]. / Distribución factorial de la carga en cuidadores de pacientes con enfermedad de Alzheimer.

INTRODUCTION: Care of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is so demanding that it can trigger states of physical, emotional and psychological distress among caregivers. The aims of this study were to determine the factorial structure of the Zarit Burden Scale (BS), to establish the differences among the factors according to the characteristics of patients and caregivers, and to determine the effect of the course of the disease on the factors on the BS over a period of two years. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, longitudinal study on non-professional caregivers of patients with AD. The study involved 463 patients with a diagnosis of probable AD. The mean age was 75.2 years. All the subjects were administered the study protocol on a six-monthly basis over a period of 24 months. The patient's cognitive and functional capacity and the presence of psychological and behavioural symptoms were evaluated. The main caregiver was asked to complete the Zarit BS. RESULTS: The 21 items on the BS were distributed into five factors that accounted for 59.7% of the total variance of the score. A multivariate analysis identified aggressiveness, apathy, irritability, the caregiver's age and his or her relation to the family as the main causes of distress. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the multidimensional structure of the BS and offers information about the effect exerted on burden by the different clinical variables of the patients and the sociodemographic variables of the caregivers.

Distribución factorial de la carga en cuidadores de pacientes con enfermedad de Alzheimer / Factorial distribution of the burden on caregivers of patients with alsheimer’s disease

La enfermedad de Alzheimer (EA) provoca una necesidad de asistencia a los pacientes que puedeprovocar estados de carga física, emocional y psicológica en los cuidadores. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron determinar la estructura factorial de la escala de carga de Zarit (EC), establecer las diferencias entre los factores según las característicasde pacientes y cuidadores y determinar el efecto de la evolución de la enfermedad sobre los factores de la EC durante un período de dos años. Sujetos y métodos. Estudio prospectivo y longitudinal en cuidadores no formales de pacientes con EA. Participaron 463 pacientes diagnosticados de EA probable. La media de edad fue de 75,2 años. A todos los sujetos se les administróel protocolo de estudio semestralmente durante un período de 24 meses. Se evaluó la capacidad cognitiva y funcional del paciente y la presencia de síntomas psicológicos y conductuales. Al cuidador principal se le administró la EC de Zarit. Resultados. Los 21 ítems de la EC se distribuyeron en cinco factores que explicaron el 59,7% de la varianza total de lapuntuación. El análisis multivariante identificó la agresividad, la apatía, la irritabilidad, la edad del cuidador y su relación familiar como los principales causantes de la carga. Conclusiones. Este estudio confirma la estructura multidimensional dela EC y aporta información sobre el efecto que las distintas variables clínicas de los pacientes y sociodemográficas de los cuidadores provocan sobre la carga

Care of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is so demanding that it can trigger states of physical,emotional and psychological distress among caregivers. The aims of this study were to determine the factorial structure of the Zarit Burden Scale (BS), to establish the differences among the factors according to the characteristics of patients and caregivers, and to determine the effect of the course of the disease on the factors on the BS over a period of two years. Subjectsand methods. We conducted a prospective, longitudinal study on non-professional caregivers of patients with AD. The study involved 463 patients with a diagnosis of probable AD. The mean age was 75.2 years. All the subjects were administered the study protocol on a six-monthly basis over a period of 24 months. The patient’s cognitive and functional capacity and thepresence of psychological and behavioural symptoms were evaluated. The main caregiver was asked to complete the Zarit BS. Results. The 21 items on the BS were distributed into five factors that accounted for 59.7% of the total variance of the score.A multivariate analysis identified aggressiveness, apathy, irritability, the caregiver's age and his or her relation to the family as the main causes of distress. Conclusions. This study confirms the multidimensional structure of the BS and offers informationabout the effect exerted on burden by the different clinical variables of the patients and the sociodemographic variables of the caregivers