Photosensitivity and self-induction in patients aged 50 and older.

OBJECTIVE: Photosensitivity is known to occur predominantly in children and adolescents and with a clear female predominance. Little is known on the prevalence of photosensitivity in older patients (50+) and its phenotypical appearance. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed investigating the prevalence of a photoparoxysmal EEG response (PPR) on at least one EEG during the period 2015-2021. Data were gathered from patients aged 50 years and older by retrieving clinical and EEG characteristics from existing medical records. Data on photosensitivity-related symptoms in daily life were gathered with telephone interviewing. RESULTS: In 248 patients a PPR had been elicited, of whom 16 patients (6.5%) were 50 years or older. In older patients, photosensitivity was a persistent feature of childhood-onset epilepsy (n = 8), of adult-onset epilepsy (n = 7), or an incidental finding (n = 1). In the 50+ group, 56% of photosensitive patients was female, whereas 72% in the total PPR-group. In six of 16 older patients, eye closure sensitivity was observed; two of these patients reported self-induction. Symptoms of photosensitivity in daily life were present in eight out of nine patients who consented in a telephone interview. For seven of these patients, wearing sunglasses was helpful. SIGNIFICANCE: Female preponderance for photosensitivity was not found in epilepsy patients of 50 years and older. In 44% of the older photosensitive patients in this series, the PPR was a feature of adult-onset epilepsy. Symptoms of photosensitivity in daily life in older patients with epilepsy seem comparable to those in younger patients, and thus worthwhile to diagnose and treat them equally.

The topographical distribution of epileptic spikes in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy with and without photosensitivity.

OBJECTIVE: Up to 30% of people with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) have photoparoxysmal responses (PPR). Recent studies report on structural and pathophysiological differences between people with JME with (JME+PPR) and without PPR (JME-PPR). We investigated whether electrophysiological features outside photic stimulation differ between these subtypes. METHODS: We analysed EEG recordings of people with JME at a tertiary epilepsy centre and an academic hospital. Photosensitivity was assessed in a drug-naïve condition. We compared the occurrence and involvement of posterior electrodes for focal abnormalities and generalised spike-wave activity in the EEG outside photic stimulation between JME+PPR and JME-PPR. RESULTS: We included EEG recordings of 18 people with JME+PPR and 21 with JME-PPR. People with JME-PPR had less focal abnormalities in the posterior brain regions than people with JME+PPR (19% vs 55%, p<0.05). There was no difference in the distribution of generalised spike-wave activity between people with JME+PPR and JME-PPR. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates electrophysiological correlates of the previously described structural and physiological differences between JME+PPR and JME-PPR. SIGNIFICANCE: Findings support the hypothesis that posterior interictal EEG abnormalities reflect localised cortical hyperexcitability, which makes patients with JME more sensitive to photic stimuli.

[Intracranial EEG monitoring for epilepsy surgery using electrode grids--results in the first 22 Dutch patients]. / Intracranieel eeg-onderzoek met elektrodematjes ten behoeve van epilepsiechirurgie; resultaten bij de eerste 22 patiënten.

OBJECTIVE: Description of initial experiences with subdural electrode grids in patients with refractory focal epilepsy as additional diagnostic tool for epilepsy surgery. Using these electrodes, the attacks were recorded during a number of days and the cerebral cortex was electrically stimulated in order to map the functional areas. DESIGN: Retrospective. METHOD: Data were collected from patients in whom subdural electrode grids had been placed between 1 September 1999 and 31 August 2004. All patients underwent a neurological examination and a neuropsychological test before the implantation. At the follow-up examination, the results with regard to function and the frequency of attacks were noted, as well as the complications. RESULTS: Electrodes were placed in 22 patients: 9 women and 13 men with an average age of 27 years (range: 5-42). The implantation lasted for an average of 7 days (range: 3-10). In 4 patients, increased seizures during implantation required intravenous anticonvulsant treatment. Severe but transitory complications were seen in 4 patients (meningitis, subdural haematoma and ischaemia). 19 patients underwent a therapeutic resection. A postoperative decline in language skills was noted in 1 patient, while another 2 scored poorer in verbal tests. A permanent decline in sensorimotor function was seen in 1 patient, but this had been foreseen. Of the 16 operated patients with a duration of follow-up of at least 1 year, so were (practically) free of attacks, and another 3 patients had significantly fewer attacks. CONCLUSION: Registration with intracranial electrodes makes it possible to treat epileptic patients surgically by excision of brain tissue near critical areas. Such intensive monitoring is, however, not without risk and this must be weighed against the potential benefits.