RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Small joints replacement is a valid treatment for moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the hand. Several design and materials are now available for prostethic procedures with very different clinical and functional outcomes. SOURCES OF DATA: An online search was carried out using Medline, Cochrane and Google scholar online databases, searching for studies on small joints replacement in hand surgery. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Good functional and clinical outcomes can be achieved with silicone and pyrolitic carbon implants, either for trapeziometacarpal and metacarpophalangeal joints. In particular, the silicone spacer seems to be very effective for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthrosis, while the pyrolitic carbon total joint prosthesis produces excellent outcomes if used for metacarpophalangeal replacement. Major complications, such as persistent pain and implant loosening, have still a variable rate of occurrence. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Heterogeneity in the methodology of the assessments in the studies reviewed and the implants and techniques involved makes it difficult to carry out a complete and effective comparative analysis of the data collected. GROWING POINTS: Larger cohorts treated with the same implant should be investigated in better designed trials, to draw more clinically relevant conclusions from the evidences presented. Better methodology is also a goal to achieve, since the average Coleman Methodology Score measured for the articles included was 54.9 out of 100. RESEARCH: More and better designed studies are needed to produce clear guidelines to define the better implant in terms of clinical outcomes, function and complications for trapeziometacarpal and metacarpophalangeal joints.
