The role of intimate partner violence and relationship satisfaction in couples' interpersonal emotional arousal.

To inform interpersonal models of intimate partner violence (IPV), the present study examines patterns of vocally encoded emotional arousal during the conversations of mixed-gender couples who reported on the extent of physical and psychological IPV and degree of relationship satisfaction (N = 149). All couples completed two problem-solving discussions. Emotional arousal was measured continuously during each conversation using vocal fundamental frequency. Contrary to expectations, results demonstrated that trajectories of arousal differed based on gender, IPV, and relationship satisfaction. Within conversations, men demonstrated linear increases in arousal at higher levels of IPV, suggesting that men may either struggle to contain their emotions or use heightened emotional expression as a conflict strategy in relationships with more extensive IPV. Conversely, women exhibited different trajectories of arousal depending on the combinations of relationship satisfaction and couple IPV, except at higher levels of their own satisfaction. Specifically, when women reported being highly satisfied in their relationships, they demonstrated similarly shaped trajectories across all levels of IPV and men's satisfaction. Together, this suggests that women's higher relationship satisfaction may buffer their emotional expression, although this may not always be adaptive within the context of relationships with extensive IPV. Overall, this study offers insight into the dynamic interpersonal processes linked with relationship distress and IPV and implies the need for a more nuanced, interpersonal research agenda for IPV research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

For better or worse: Associations among psychopathology symptoms, interpersonal emotion dynamics, and gender in couples.

Communication has long been associated with the well-being of a couple's relationship, and it is also important to explore associations with individual well-being. This study examined the associations between emotions communicated within couple interactions and each partner's psychopathology symptoms concurrently and up to 3 years later. Vocally-encoded emotional arousal (f0) was measured during couples' (N = 56) conversations. Analyses examined each partner's trajectories of f0 and how each partner influenced the other's f0 across the conversation. The findings indicated that women experienced higher symptoms if they (a) decreased more steeply in f0 overall and (b) returned to their baseline in f0 more quickly. Moreover, women had higher symptoms if they had a steeper return to baseline because of men's elevated f0. In contrast, men experienced higher symptoms when men (a) more slowly returned to baseline and (b) changed their f0 trajectory because of women's elevated f0. That is, women who expressed less emotional arousal, independently and as a result of the influence of their male partner, experienced more symptoms. In contrast, men's symptoms were differentially associated with their own independent experience of emotional arousal (in which he experienced fewer symptoms when changing arousal more quickly) from how they responded to women's arousal. Given how differently men's and women's psychopathology were associated with emotional expression, these findings raise questions about how partners can communicate to protect their own and their partner's mental health in the short- and long-term. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Cognitive-behavioral couple therapy for same-sex female couples: A pilot study.

Despite comparable levels of relationship satisfaction and intimacy, same-sex couples break up faster and more often than different-sex couples, highlighting a need for quality couple therapy. Research suggests that culturally tailored services are desired by same-sex couples and may be more effective and better received. Although efficacious couple therapies exist to treat relationship distress, they have been overwhelmingly studied with different-sex couples. Sexual minority (SM) affirming couple therapies have not been systematically developed or evaluated. The current study involved developing and pilot testing a couple therapy tailored for distressed same-sex female couples. This treatment integrates the SM stress model with the empirically supported cognitive-behavioral couple therapy framework and is the first culturally tailored couple therapy for same-sex couples to be empirically evaluated. Therapists delivered the treatment in an open-trial format to a pilot sample of 11 same-sex female couples experiencing relationship distress and SM stress. Treatment was delivered with high adherence to the treatment manual. Participants reported high treatment satisfaction. As hypothesized, participants experienced significant decreases in relationship distress and improvements in couple coping with SM stress from pre- to post-therapy. Limitations precluded clear conclusions regarding anticipated improvements in individual mental health. Participants experienced comparable or stronger improvements in relationship functioning compared to couples in a similar benchmark study. Given this is a small pilot study, results are interpreted with caution. Implications for culturally tailoring evidence-based couple therapy for marginalized groups are discussed.

A pesar de los niveles comparables de satisfacción con la relación y de intimidad, las parejas del mismo sexo se separan más rápidamente y con más frecuencia que las parejas de distinto sexo, lo cual destaca la necesidad de una terapia de pareja de calidad. Las investigaciones indican que las parejas del mismo sexo desean recibir servicios adaptados a las culturas, los cuales pueden ser más eficaces y mejor recibidos. Aunque existen terapias de pareja eficaces para tratar el distrés en las relaciones, estas se han estudiado en su mayoría con parejas de distinto sexo. Las terapias de pareja dedicadas a las minorías sexuales no se han desarrollado ni evaluado sistemáticamente. El presente estudio implicó el desarrollo y la prueba piloto de una terapia de pareja adaptada para parejas femeninas del mismo sexo con distrés. Este tratamiento integra el modelo de estrés de las minorías sexuales con el marco de la terapia de pareja cognitivo-conductual respaldado empíricamente, y es la primera terapia de pareja adaptada culturalmente para parejas del mismo sexo que se evalúa empíricamente. Los terapeutas administraron el tratamiento en un formato de estudio abierto a una muestra piloto de 11 parejas femeninas del mismo sexo que sufrían distrés relacional y estrés por minoría sexual. El tratamiento se aplicó con una alta adhesión al manual de tratamiento. Las participantes informaron una alta satisfacción con el tratamiento. Como se planteó en la hipótesis, las participantes disminuyeron considerablemente el distrés relacional y mejoraron en el afrontamiento del estrés por minoría sexual de la pareja después de la terapia respecto de antes de la terapia. Las limitaciones impidieron sacar conclusiones claras con respecto a la previsión de mejorías en la salud mental individual. Las participantes tuvieron mejorías comparables o más marcadas en el funcionamiento de la relación respecto de las parejas de un estudio comparativo similar. Teniendo en cuenta que este es un estudio piloto pequeño, los resultados se interpretan con cautela. Se comentan las implicancias para adaptar culturalmente la terapia de pareja factual para grupos marginados.

Love in the time of COVID-19: A brief report on relationship and individual functioning among committed couples in the United States while under shelter-in-place orders.

The COVID-19 pandemic in the United States has changed many aspects of people's daily life, including increased time at home in response to shelter-in-place orders, heightened stress about health effects of COVID-19, and shifts in other domains of life (e.g., employment). These lifestyle changes are likely to impact the well-being of individuals and their romantic relationships. This investigation examined how COVID-19 influenced couple and individual well-being in real-time during the early phase of the pandemic. Data were collected in early May 2020 during shelter-in-place orders in the United States. Participants in committed relationships (n = 332) completed an online survey assessing their experiences currently and before the pandemic. Results suggested that while couple functioning overall maintained or even improved, individual well-being was more negatively impacted by the pandemic. Moreover, some groups who are at higher risk of a poor health outcome from COVID-19 or experience unique challenges as a result of COVID-19 reported worse outcomes (e.g., those whose employment changed) while others did not decline in their psychological and couple functioning (e.g., Black individuals and older individuals). These findings suggest that the pandemic has had varied impacts on couples and individuals, as well as across different virus-related risk factors. Further research is needed to understand the nuanced effects of this pandemic on couples and individuals across time.

La pandemia de la COVID-19 en los Estados Unidos ha cambiado muchos aspectos de la vida diaria de las personas, por ejemplo, el aumento del tiempo que pasan en sus hogares en respuesta a órdenes de confinamiento, un estrés más elevado por los efectos de la COVID-19 en la salud, y cambios en otros aspectos de la vida (p. ej.: en el empleo). Estos cambios en el estilo de vida probablemente repercutan en el bienestar de las personas y en sus relaciones amorosas. En esta investigación se analizó cómo la COVID-19 influyó en el bienestar de las parejas y de los individuos en tiempo real durante la primera fase de la pandemia. A principios de mayo de 2020 se recopilaron datos durante las órdenes de confinamiento en los Estados Unidos. Los participantes que estaban en relaciones de pareja estables (n=332) contestaron una encuesta en línea donde se evaluaron sus experiencias de ese momento y las anteriores a la pandemia. Los resultados indicaron que, si bien el funcionamiento de la pareja en general se mantuvo o incluso mejoró, la pandemia afectó más negativamente el bienestar individual. Además, algunos grupos que tienen mayor riesgo de resultados desfavorables en la salud como consecuencia de la COVID-19 o enfrentan dificultades singulares como resultado de la COVID-19 informaron peores resultados (p. ej.: aquellos cuyos empleos cambiaron), mientras que otros no tuvieron un empeoramiento de su funcionamiento psicológico y de pareja (p. ej.: las personas de color y las personas mayores). Estos resultados sugieren que la pandemia ha tenido efectos variados en las parejas y en los individuos, así como entre los diferentes factores de riesgo relacionados con el virus. Se necesitan más investigaciones para comprender los efectos sutiles de esta pandemia en las parejas y en los individuos con el transcurso del tiempo.

High sensitivity and specificity screening for clinically significant intimate partner violence.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has recommended that clinicians screen patients for intimate partner violence (IPV). This article aims to develop and test the first screeners for clinically significant physical and psychological IPV (i.e., acts meeting criteria in the International Classification of Diseases (11th ed.; ICD-11; World Health Organization, 2019) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The goal was to derive screeners that (1) are maximally brief, while still achieving high sensitivity and specificity; (2) assess perpetration and victimization when either men or women are reporting; and (3) use ICD-11/DSM-5 criteria as the reference standard. Random samples of active duty service members at 82 installations worldwide were obtained via e-mail invitation (2006: N = 54,543; 2008: N = 48,909); their response rates were excellent for long general population surveys with no payment (2006: 44.7%, 2008: 49.0%). The population of spouses at the participating installation was invited by mailed postcard (2006: N = 19,722; 2008: N = 12,127; response rates-2006: 12.3%, 2008: 10.8%). Clinically significant physical intimate partner violence can be effectively screened with as few as four items, with sensitivities > 90% and specificities > 95%; clinically significant psychological intimate partner violence can be screened with two items. Men and women can be screened with equivalent accuracy, as can those committing the violence and those victimized by it. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

The lump-versus-split dilemma in couple observational coding: A multisite analysis of rapid marital interaction coding system data.

Historically, observational couple communication researchers have oscillated between splitting behaviors into narrowly defined discrete codes and grouping behaviors into broader codes-sometimes within the same study. We label this the "lump-versus-split dilemma." Coding across a decade and 11 investigators were used to recommend the most meaningful number of codes to use when observing couples' conflict. We combined data from 14 studies that used the Rapid Marital Interaction Coding System (RMICS) to score communication behavior during different-sex couples' conflict interactions. In each study, couples completed at least one 10-min, video-recorded conflict discussion. Communication during these interactions was coded by trained research staff using RMICS; all codes were compiled into a single data set for descriptive analysis and exploratory factor analyses (EFAs). The final sample comprised N = 2,011 couples. Several RMICS codes were extremely infrequent-specifically, distress-maintaining attributions, psychological abuse, withdrawal, dysphoric affect, and relationship-enhancing attributions. By far, the most frequent code was constructive problem discussion. EFAs yielded two factors for both women and men. Factor 1 (Negative) contained two items: distress-maintaining attributions and hostility. Factor 2 (Nonnegative) contained constructive problem discussion and humor (and, for women only, acceptance). Results side heavily with the "lump" camp in the lump-versus-split dilemma in couple observational coding. These RMICS factor analysis results converge with those from other systems and imply that the microanalytic "splitting" era in couples coding should draw to a close, with future studies instead focused on negative, neutral, and positive codes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Escalation and Regulation of Emotional Arousal in Couples Predicts Relationship Satisfaction Concurrently and 25 Years Later.

Relationship distress and divorce are major risk factors for the development or exacerbation of psychopathology and psychosocial impairments. Given that heightened negative emotions within couples' interactions may portend negative relationship outcomes, it is critical to understand how emotions unfold across a conversation and how partners may influence each other's immediate emotional experiences. This study examined whether these regulatory dynamics within one interaction predicted relationship satisfaction concurrently and 25 years later. Vocally-encoded emotional arousal (f0 ) was measured during couples' (N = 25 couples) conversations about a relationship issue. Across different analytical strategies, results demonstrate that one partner's f0 dynamics had immediate and long-term associations with the other partner's satisfaction. Partners were less satisfied if the other partner (a) expressed higher f0 overall and (b) escalated more in f0 across the conversation. Yet, partners were more satisfied when their f0 escalated across the conversation. Also, women specifically were more satisfied if their f0 remained elevated longer before regulating back to their emotional baseline. Thus, higher f0 was associated with higher satisfaction in the same partner, but associated with less satisfaction in the other partner-particularly when these emotions come from women. It may be that partners have to decide whether to prioritize expressing their emotions fully or limit expression in the service of their partner's happiness. These findings challenge us to think of ways to address this "win-lose" scenario so that couples can balance both partners' emotional needs and preserve relationship quality across the life span.

El distrés relacional y el divorcio son grandes factores de riesgo para el desarrollo o la exacerbación de alteraciones psicopatológicas y psicosociales. Teniendo en cuenta que las emociones negativas intensificadas dentro de las interacciones de las parejas pueden predecir consecuencias negativas en las relaciones, es fundamental comprender cómo se revelan las emociones a lo largo de una conversación y cómo los integrantes de la pareja pueden influenciar las experiencias emocionales inmediatas del otro. Este estudio examinó si esta dinámica reguladora dentro de una interacción predijo la satisfacción con la relación inmediatamente y 25 años después. Se midió la codificación vocal de la excitación emocional (f0 ) durante las conversaciones de las parejas (N = 25 parejas) acerca de un problema en la relación. Entre diferentes estrategias analíticas, los resultados demuestran que la dinámica de la f0 de uno de los integrantes de la pareja tuvo asociaciones inmediatas y a largo plazo con la satisfacción del otro integrante de la pareja. Los integrantes de la pareja se sentían menos satisfechos si el otro integrante de la pareja (a) expresaba una f0 más elevada en general y (b) escalaba más en la f0 durante la conversación. Sin embargo, los integrantes de la pareja estaban más satisfechos cuando su f0 escalaba a lo largo de la conversación. También, las mujeres estaban específicamente más satisfechas si su f0 se mantenía elevada más tiempo antes de regularla para volver a su momento basal emocional. Por lo tanto, una f0 más elevada se asoció con una mayor satisfacción en el mismo integrante de la pareja, pero se asoció con una menor satisfacción en el otro integrante de la pareja, particularmente cuando estas emociones vienen de las mujeres. Es posible que los integrantes de la pareja tengan que decidir si priorizar la expresión completa de sus emociones o limitar la expresión al servicio de la felicidad de su pareja. Estos resultados nos plantean el desafío de pensar en maneras de abordar esta situación en la que "se gana o se pierde", de manera que las parejas puedan equilibrar las necesidades emocionales de ambos integrantes de la pareja y conservar la calidad de la relación durante su tiempo de vida.

A case-controlled field study evaluating ICD-11 proposals for relational problems and intimate partner violence.

Background/Objective: Intimate partner relationship problems and intimate partner abuse and neglect - referred to in this paper as "relational problems and maltreatment" - have substantial and well-documented impact on both physical and mental health. However, classification guidelines, such as those found in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), are vague and unlikely to support consistent application. Revised guidelines proposed for ICD-11 are much more operationalized. We used standardized clinical vignette conditions with an international panel of clinicians to test if ICD-11 changes resulted in improved classification accuracy. Method: English-speaking mental health professionals (N = 738) from 65 nations applied ICD-10 or ICD-11 (proposed) guidelines with experimentally manipulated case presentations of presence or absence of (a) individual mental health diagnoses and (b) relational problems or maltreatment. Results: ICD-11, compared with ICD-10, guidelines resulted in significantly better classification accuracy, although only in the presence of co-morbid mental health problems. Clinician factors (e. g., gender, language, world region) largely did not impact classification performance. Conclusions: Despite being considerably more explicated, raters' performance with ICD-11 guidelines reveals training issues that should be addressed prior to the release of ICD-11 in 2018 (e. g., overriding the guidelines with pre-existing archetypes for relationship problems and physical and psychological abuse).

Antecedentes/Objetivo: Los problemas en la relación de pareja y relacionados con abuso y negligencia de pareja, referidos como "problemas relacionales y maltrato", tienen un importante impacto en la salud física y mental. Sin embargo, guías de clasificación, como la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades (CIE-10), son vagas y su aplicación es inconsistente. Las guías propuestas por el CIE-11 son más operacionales. Junto con un panel de clínicos, utilizamos viñetas clínicas estandarizadas, para evaluar si los cambios propuestos por CIE-11 mejoraban la precisión de la clasificación. Método: Profesionales de la salud de habla inglesa (N=738) de 65 naciones compararon la aplicación del CIE-10 y CIE-11 en casos experimentales, estableciendo presencia o ausencia de (a) diagnósticos individuales de salud mental y (b) problemas de relaciones o maltrato. Resultados: CIE-11 tuvo resultados significativamente más precisos, aunque solo en presencia de comorbilidades de salud mental. Factores como género, idioma y región no presentaron mayor alteración. Conclusiones: Aunque el CIE-11 está mejor explicado, este estudio revela problemas de capacitación que deberían abordarse antes de su publicación en 2018.

A case-controlled field study evaluating ICD-11 proposals for relational problems and intimate partner violence / Estudio de campo con casos controlados para evaluar propuestas de la CIE-11 en problemas relacionales y de violencia de pareja

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Intimate partner relationship problems and intimate partner abuse and neglect - referred to in this paper as "relational problems and maltreatment" - have substantial and well-documented impact on both physical and mental health. However, classification guidelines, such as those found in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), are vague and unlikely to support consistent application. Revised guidelines proposed for ICD-11 are much more operationalized. We used standardized clinical vignette conditions with an international panel of clinicians to test if ICD-11 changes resulted in improved classification accuracy. METHOD: English-speaking mental health professionals (N = 738) from 65 nations applied ICD-10 or ICD-11 (proposed) guidelines with experimentally manipulated case presentations of presence or absence of (a) individual mental health diagnoses and (b) relational problems or maltreatment. RESULTS: ICD-11, compared with ICD-10, guidelines resulted in significantly better classification accuracy, although only in the presence of co-morbid mental health problems. Clinician factors (e. g., gender, language, world region) largely did not impact classification performance. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being considerably more explicated, raters' performance with ICD-11 guidelines reveals training issues that should be addressed prior to the release of ICD-11 in 2018 (e. g., overriding the guidelines with pre-existing archetypes for relationship problems and physical and psychological abuse)

ANTECEDENTES/OBJETIVO: Los problemas en la relación de pareja y relacionados con abuso y negligencia de pareja, referidos como "problemas relacionales y maltrato", tienen un importante impacto en la salud física y mental. Sin embargo, guías de clasificación, como la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades (CIE-10), son vagas y su aplicación es inconsistente. Las guías propuestas por el CIE-11 son más operacionales. Junto con un panel de clínicos, utilizamos viñetas clínicas estandarizadas, para evaluar si los cambios propuestos por CIE-11 mejoraban la precisión de la clasificación. MÉTODO: Profesionales de la salud de habla inglesa (N=738) de 65 naciones compararon la aplicación del CIE-10 y CIE-11 en casos experimentales, estableciendo presencia o ausencia de (a) diagnósticos individuales de salud mental y (b) problemas de relaciones o maltrato. RESULTADOS: CIE-11 tuvo resultados significativamente más precisos, aunque solo en presencia de comorbilidades de salud mental. Factores como género, idioma y región no presentaron mayor alteración. CONCLUSIONES: Aunque el CIE-11 está mejor explicado, este estudio revela problemas de capacitación que deberían abordarse antes de su publicación en 2018