Programa de entrenamiento basado en TeamSTEPPS® mediante simulación clínica en profesionales de cuidados intensivos: un estudio con metodología mixta / TeamSTEPPS®-based clinical simulation training program for critical care professionals: A mixed-methodology study

Introducción: El programa Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS®) ha demostrado mejorar el trabajo interprofesional entre los profesionales sanitarios mejorando el trabajo en equipo. Se formó a profesionales de cuidados intensivos en esta metodología mediante el Curso «Instructor/a en simulación: Mejorando el Trabajo en Equipo a Través de TeamSTEPPS®». Objetivos: Analizar el desempeño del trabajo en equipo y las buenas prácticas en simulación de los profesionales de cuidados intensivos asistentes al curso y explorar sus percepciones sobre la experiencia formativa llevada a cabo durante el mismo. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio descriptivo transversal y fenomenológico mediante una metodología mixta. Se aplicaron a los 18 asistentes al curso los cuestionarios «TeamSTEPPS™ 2.0 Team Performance Observation Tool» para evaluar el desempeño del trabajo en equipo y «Educational Practices Questionnaire» para las buenas prácticas en simulación tras los escenarios simulados. Posteriormente se realizó una entrevista grupal a través de un grupo focal a ocho asistentes mediante la plataforma de videoconferencias Zoom™. Se realizó un análisis temático y de contenido de los discursos desde el paradigma interpretativo. Los datos cuantitativos y cualitativos se analizaron mediante los programas IBM SPSS Statistics™ 27.0 y MAXQDA Analytics Pro™, respectivamente. Resultados: Tanto el nivel de desempeño del trabajo en equipo (media = 96,25; DT = 8.257) como las buenas prácticas en simulación (media = 75; DT = 1.632) tras los escenarios simulados fueron adecuados. Se identificaron los siguientes temas principales: satisfacción con la metodología TeamSTEPPS®, utilidad de la metodología, barreras de implementación de la misma y habilidades no técnicas mejoradas a través del TeamSTEPPS®. Conclusiones: La metodología TeamSTEPPS® puede ser una buena estrategia de educación interprofesional para la mejora de la comunicación el...(AU)

Introduction: The Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS®) programme has been shown to improve interprofessional work among healthcare professionals by enhancing teamwork. Intensive care professionals were trained in this methodology through the course «Simulation Trainer: Improving Teamwork through TeamSTEPPS®». Objectives: To analyse the teamwork performance and good practice in simulation of the intensive care professionals attending the course and to explore their perceptions of the training experience carried out during the course. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive and phenomenological study was carried out using a mixed methodology. The 18 course participants were administered the questionnaires «TeamSTEPPS™ 2.0 Team Performance Observation Tool» to evaluate teamwork performance and «Educational Practices Questionnaire» for good practices in simulation after the simulated scenarios. Subsequently, a group interview was conducted through a focus group with 8 attendees using the Zoom™ videoconferencing platform. A thematic and content analysis of the discourses was carried out using the interpretative paradigm. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics™ 27.0 and MAXQDA Analytics Pro™, respectively. Results: Both the level of teamwork performance (mean = 96.25; SD = 8.257) and good practice in simulation (mean = 75; SD = 1.632) following the simulated scenarios were adequate. The following main themes were identified: satisfaction with the TeamSTEPPS® methodology, usefulness of the methodology, barriers to methodology implementation and non-technical skills improved through TeamSTEPPS®. Conclusions: TeamSTEPPS® methodology can be a good interprofessional education strategy for the improvement of communication and teamwork in intensive care professionals, both at the care level (through on-site simulation strategies)...(AU)

TeamSTEPPS®-based clinical simulation training program for critical care professionals: A mixed-methodology study.

INTRODUCTION: The Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS®) programme has been shown to improve interprofessional work among healthcare professionals by enhancing teamwork. Intensive care professionals were trained in this methodology through the course "Simulation Trainer: Improving Teamwork through TeamSTEPPS®". OBJECTIVES: To analyse the teamwork performance and good practice in simulation of the intensive care professionals attending the course and to explore their perceptions of the training experience carried out during the course. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive and phenomenological study was carried out using a mixed methodology. The 18 course participants were administered the questionnaires "TeamSTEPPS™ 2.0 Team Performance Observation Tool" to evaluate teamwork performance and "Educational Practices Questionnaire" for good practices in simulation after the simulated scenarios. Subsequently, a group interview was conducted through a focus group with 8 attendees using the Zoom™ videoconferencing platform. A thematic and content analysis of the discourses was carried out using the interpretative paradigm. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics™ 27.0 and MAXQDA Analytics Pro™ respectively. RESULTS: Both the level of teamwork performance (mean = 96.25; SD = 8.257) and good practice in simulation (mean = 75; SD = 1.632) following the simulated scenarios were adequate. The following main themes were identified: satisfaction with the TeamSTEPPS® methodology, usefulness of the methodology, barriers to methodology implementation and non-technical skills improved through TeamSTEPPS®. CONCLUSIONS: TeamSTEPPS® methodology can be a good interprofessional education strategy for the improvement of communication and teamwork in intensive care professionals, both at the care level (through on-site simulation strategies) and at the teaching level (through its inclusion in the students' curriculum).

Virtual Simulation for Last-Year Nursing Graduate Students in Times of Covid-19: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has made it necessary to adapt university health-education. Virtual simulation has been proposed to be a suitable tool. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was conducted on nursing students in the final year. The virtual simulation platform vSim® was used. Improvements in knowledge, skills during simulation, satisfaction and selfconfidence obtained through the training provided were analyzed, as well as satisfaction with the platform. RESULTS: Prepost training knowledge improved. Skill acquisition improved between the first and last attempts in all cases. The levels of selfconfidence and satisfaction with the training and the platform used were high. CONCLUSIONS: The vSim® was a useful solution during the pandemic. Knowledge improved and high selfconfidence was obtained.

Care and treatments related to intensive care unit-acquired muscle weakness: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit-acquired muscle weakness (ICUAW) has an incidence of 40-46%. Early mobilisation is known to be a protective factor. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify the incidence of ICUAW in Spain and to evaluate variables likely to contribute to the development of ICUAW. METHODS: A 4-month, prospective observational multicentre cohort study was conducted on patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h. Data were collected from ICU day 3 until ICU discharge. The primary outcome was presence of ICUAW (diagnosed using the Medical Research Council [MRC] scale). The secondary outcome was nurse-patient ratio, physiotherapist availability, analgesia, sedation and delirium management, glycaemic control, and daily level of mobility during the ICU stay as per the ICU Mobility Scale. A logistic regression model was constructed based exclusively on days 3-5 of the ICU stay. RESULTS: The data of 642 patients were analysed from 80 ICUs, accounting for 35% of all ICUs in Spain. The incidence of ICUAW was 58% (275 of 474 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI] [53-62]). The predictors for ICUAW were older age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.01; 95% CI [1.00-1.03]) and more days with renal replacement therapy (OR = 1.01; 95% CI [1.00-1.02]). The protective factors for ICUAW were male gender (OR = 0.58; 95% CI [0.38-0.89]), higher Barthel Index (showing prehospital functional independence) (OR = 0.97; 95% CI [0.95-0.99]), more days of being awake and cooperative (defined by a feasible MRC assessment) (OR = 0.98; 95% CI [0.97-0.99]), presence of delirium (OR = 0.98; 95% CI [0.97-0.99]), and more days with active mobilisation (ICU Mobility Scale ≥ 4) (OR = 0.98; 95% CI [0.97-0.99]). CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors for ICUAW were functional dependence before admission, female gender, older age, and more days on renal replacement therapy. The protective factors for ICUAW were feasibility of MRC assessment, the presence of delirium, and being actively mobilised during the first 5 days in the ICU.

Psychometric design and validation of a tool to assess the medication administration process through simulation in undergraduate nursing students.

BACKGROUND: Medication errors account for 38% of adverse events reported among undergraduate nursing students. Simulation provides training for nursing students in the medication administration process. However, there is a lack of reliable and valid instruments to measure its assessment. OBJECTIVES: To design and validate a new tool (MEDICORRECT) to assess undergraduate nursing students in the medication administration process using a high-fidelity simulation scenario. DESIGN AND METHODS: Study participants were fourth year undergraduate nursing students at the University of Barcelona. Phase 1 consisted of tool design and drafting, and content validity and feasibility analyses. Phase 2 covered construct validity and interrater reliability. A factor analysis was conducted, involving a principal component analysis and varimax rotation. FINDINGS: Of 21 initial items, 11 were eliminated because of low content validity ratio, 4 of which assessed cognitive skills such as administering the right medicine at the right dose, which were impossible to observe in the simulation scenario. The final version of MEDICORRECT contained 10 items. The exploratory factor analysis identified a four-factorial model explaining 67.3% of the variance. Interrater agreement measured with Kappa was greater than 0.70 for 80% of items. CONCLUSIONS: The 10 items in MEDICORRECT are relevant and feasible, have suitable psychometric properties and reflect the practical skills identified in the medication administration process. The tool excludes cognitive skills, which should be included and assessed during prebriefing.

Alimentación por sonda pospilórica versus sonda gástrica para la prevención de la neumonía y la mejora de los resultados nutricionales en adultos en estado crítico / Post-pyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preventing pneumonia and improving nutritional outcomes in critically ill adults

No disponible

Grado de implementación de las estrategias preventivas del síndrome post-UCI: estudio observacional multicéntrico en España / Degree of implementation of preventive strategies for post-ICU syndrome: Multi-centre, observational study in Spain

Objetivo: Evaluar el nivel de implementación de los protocolos asociados a la prevención de la debilidad muscular adquirida en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI), así como la presencia del fisioterapeuta en distintas UCI de España. Método: Estudio descriptivo, transversal realizado en 86 UCI de adultos de España entre los meses de marzo a junio de 2017. Se excluyeron UCI neuroquirúrgicas y de grandes quemados. Se utilizó encuesta multirrespuesta que incluía preguntas sobre los protocolos de: control de glucemia, sedación, valoración del dolor, prevención del delirium, manejo del delirium y movilización precoz. La encuesta fue rellenada a través de un aplicativo protegido por usuario y contraseña. Análisis inferencial con t de Student o U de Mann-Whitney y de correlación con Pearson o Rho de Spearman. Resultados: El 89,5% de las UCI tenían protocolo de control de glucemia, con rango predominante de 110-140 mg/dl. El 74,4% evaluaban el nivel de sedación, si bien solo tenían protocolos de sedación el 36% de ellas. Con relación a la valoración del dolor se realizaba en el 73,7% de los pacientes comunicativos, mientras que en los no comunicativos solo era del 47,5%. Solo el 37,2% realizaban screening diario para detectar el delirium, y disponían de protocolos de prevención del delirium el 31,4% de las UCI, del manejo del delirium el 26,7% y de movilización precoz el 14% de las UCI. En el 34,9% de los casos se solicita interconsulta al servicio de rehabilitación. Conclusiones: La implementación de los diferentes protocolos asociados a la prevención de la debilidad muscular adquirida ha sido elevada en relación con los protocolos de control de glucemia, valoración del nivel de sedación y del dolor de pacientes comunicativos, mientras que baja en los de movilización precoz y screening y prevención del delirio. Asimismo, es poco frecuente la presencia del fisioterapeuta en la UCI

Aim: To evaluate the degree of implementation of protocols associated with the prevention of intensive-care-unit (ICU) acquired muscle weakness, and the presence of the physiotherapist in various ICU in Spain. Method: A descriptive, cross-sectional study performed in 86 adult ICU in Spain between March and June 2017. Neurosurgical and major burns ICU were excluded. A multiple-choice survey was used that included questions on protocols for glycaemia control, sedation, pain assessment, delirium prevention, delirium management and early mobilisation. The survey was completed using a user-protected application and password. The Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson's correlation or Spearman's Rho test were used for the inferential analysis. Results: Eighty-nine point five percent of the ICU had a glycaemia control protocol, with a predominating range of 110-140 mg/dl. Seventy-four point four percent evaluated sedation levels, although only 36% had sedation protocols. Pain assessment was carried out on communicative patients in 73.7%, and on uncommunicative patients in only 47.5%. Only 37.2% performed daily screening to detect delirium and 31.4% of the ICU had delirium prevention protocols, 26.7% had delirium management protocols and 14% had protocols for early mobilisation. Thirty-four point nine percent requested cross consultation with the rehabilitation department. Conclusions: The implementation of the different protocols associated with the prevention of ICU-acquired muscle weakness was high in relation to glycaemia control protocols, sedation level and pain assessment in communicative patients, and was low for early mobilisation and delirium screening and prevention. Similarly, the physiotherapist was seldom present in the ICU

Degree of implementation of preventive strategies for post-ICU syndrome: Multi-centre, observational study in Spain. / Grado de implementación de las estrategias preventivas del síndrome post-UCI: estudio observacional multicéntrico en España.

AIM: To evaluate the degree of implementation of protocols associated with the prevention of intensive-care-unit (ICU) acquired muscle weakness, and the presence of the physiotherapist in various ICU in Spain. METHOD: A descriptive, cross-sectional study performed in 86 adult ICU in Spain between March and June 2017. Neurosurgical and major burns ICU were excluded. A multiple-choice survey was used that included questions on protocols for glycaemia control, sedation, pain assessment, delirium prevention, delirium management and early mobilisation. The survey was completed using a user-protected application and password. The Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson's correlation or Spearman's Rho test were used for the inferential analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-nine point five percent of the ICU had a glycaemia control protocol, with a predominating range of 110-140mg/dl. Seventy-four point four percent evaluated sedation levels, although only 36% had sedation protocols. Pain assessment was carried out on communicative patients in 73.7%, and on uncommunicative patients in only 47.5%. Only 37.2% performed daily screening to detect delirium and 31.4% of the ICU had delirium prevention protocols, 26.7% had delirium management protocols and 14% had protocols for early mobilisation. Thirty-four point nine percent requested cross consultation with the rehabilitation department. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the different protocols associated with the prevention of ICU-acquired muscle weakness was high in relation to glycaemia control protocols, sedation level and pain assessment in communicative patients, and was low for early mobilisation and delirium screening and prevention. Similarly, the physiotherapist was seldom present in the ICU.

Evaluación del cumplimiento de cabeceros elevados entre 30–45 o en pacientes intubados / Evaluation of the compliance of semirecumbent position between 30–45 o in intubated patients

ObjetivoDeterminar cumplimiento del estándar “cabecero de la cama entre 30–45o en pacientes con vía aérea (VA) artificial”. Conocer la opinión de los profesionales respecto a él.Material y métodosEstudio observacional prospectivo, realizado en diciembre de 2009 en el servicio de medicina intensiva de un hospital terciario. Excluidos: con limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico, decúbito prono y anti-Trendelemburg. Se registró: altura del cabecero, experiencia del enfermero, turno, percepción del auditor, diagnóstico, tipo de VA artificial (traqueostomía o tubo endotraqueal [TOT]), ventilación mecánica (VM), sí/no, y nutrición enteral (NE). Se realizó una encuesta a los enfermeros para saber si conocían el estándar, lo cumplían, método utilizado y sugerencias. Se utilizó la t de Student, ANOVA para análisis multivariable y la χ2, Test de Fisher; se consideró significativo p<0,05.ResultadosSe obtuvieron 546 mediciones válidas, de 53 pacientes. El 40,9% tenía el cabecero correcto (30–45o). Los profesionales con menos de 1 año de experiencia son los que elevan menos el cabecero; sólo el 26,4% de estas determinaciones estaba por encima de 30o. El 34,8% de los pacientes neurocríticos (NC) cumplían el estándar en relación con no NC (46,7%) (p<0,05). El 29,2% de los pacientes con traqueostomía estaban con más de 30o frente al 44% de las mediciones realizadas en pacientes con TOT (p<0,05). No hubo diferencias entre turnos, VM o NE. Capacidad diagnóstica de la percepción del auditor: sensibilidad, 91,6%; especificidad, 72,5%; valor predictivo positivo, 70,2%; valor predictivo negativo (VPN), 92,4%. El 97,9% de los profesionales encuestados conoce el estándar. La estimación visual se utiliza en el 97,2% de los casos.ConclusionesEl cumplimiento del estándar es<50% aunque se conoce bien. A pesar de que la percepción subjetiva tiene un elevado VPN, parece insuficiente para cumplir el estándar(AU)

AimsTo determine compliance of the standard “semirecumbent position between 30–45o in patients with artificial airway (AA)”. To know the opinion of the professionals on this issue.Material and methodsAn observational, prospective study was carried out in December 2009 in the ICU department of a tertiary hospital that excluded the limitation of therapeutic effort, prone position and antitrendelemburg. Data collected: headrest angle, professional experience of the nurse, shift, perception of the auditor, diagnostic, type of AA (tracheostomy or endotracheal tube), mechanical ventilation (MV) (yes/no) and enteral nutrition (EN). Nurses were surveyed to verify if they knew the standard, if they complied with it, the method used and their suggestions. We used the Student's t test and ANOVA for multivariable analysis, and Fisher's χ2; p<0.05=significant.ResultsA total of 546 valid measurements were obtained from 53 patients, of which 40.9% had the correct semirecumbent position (30–45o). Professionals with<1 year of experience were those who raised the headrest the least, with only 26.4% of these measurements over 30o. The standard was met in only 34.8% of the neurocritical patients (NC) vs non NC (46.7%) (p<0.05). It was < 30o in 29.2% of patients with tracheostomy vs 44% measurements performed on patients with TOT (p<0.05). There were no differences between shifts, the use of MV or EN. Diagnostic accuracy of the auditor: sensitivity: 91.6%; specificity: 72.5%; positive predictive value: 70.2%; negative predictive value (NPV): 92.4%. 97.9% of responders know the standard. Visual judgment was used in 97.2% of the cases.ConclusionsMeasured compliance was less than 50% although the standard is well known by the nursing team. Even though the subjective perception has a high NPV, it does not achieve the standard(AU)

[Evaluation of the compliance of semirecumbent position between 30-45° in intubated patients]. / Evaluación del cumplimiento de cabeceros elevados entre 30-45° en pacientes intubados.

AIMS: To determine compliance of the standard "semirecumbent position between 30-45° in patients with artificial airway (AA)". To know the opinion of the professionals on this issue. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, prospective study was carried out in December 2009 in the ICU department of a tertiary hospital that excluded the limitation of therapeutic effort, prone position and antitrendelemburg. DATA COLLECTED: headrest angle, professional experience of the nurse, shift, perception of the auditor, diagnostic, type of AA (tracheostomy or endotracheal tube), mechanical ventilation (MV) (yes/no) and enteral nutrition (EN). Nurses were surveyed to verify if they knew the standard, if they complied with it, the method used and their suggestions. We used the Student's t test and ANOVA for multivariable analysis, and Fisher's χ2; p<0.05=significant. RESULTS: A total of 546 valid measurements were obtained from 53 patients, of which 40.9% had the correct semirecumbent position (30-45°). Professionals with <1 year of experience were those who raised the headrest the least, with only 26.4% of these measurements over 30°. The standard was met in only 34.8% of the neurocritical patients (NC) vs non NC (46.7%) (p<0.05). It was <30° in 29.2% of patients with tracheostomy vs 44% measurements performed on patients with TOT (p<0.05). There were no differences between shifts, the use of MV or EN. Diagnostic accuracy of the auditor: sensitivity: 91.6%; specificity: 72.5%; positive predictive value: 70.2%; negative predictive value (NPV): 92.4%. 97.9% of responders know the standard. Visual judgment was used in 97.2% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Measured compliance was less than 50% although the standard is well known by the nursing team. Even though the subjective perception has a high NPV, it does not achieve the standard.

DFT calculation of four new potential agents muscarinic of bispyridinium type: structure, synthesis, biological activity, hydration, and relations with the potents W84 and DUO-3O.

Four new potential agents muscarinic (allosteric modulators) were synthesized and studied by using the B3LYP density functional method. The optimum conformation and geometry structure of these compounds were determined and analyzed. Solvent effects were considered including a variable number (1-15) of explicit water molecules surrounding the compound in order to simulate the first hydration shell, as well as using the Tomasi's polarized continuum model (PCM). A similar simultaneous analysis of the potents W84 and DUO-3O allosteric modulator of muscarinic receptors was also carried out. The effect of the hydration on the total atomic charges and several intermolecular distances of interest were also discussed. The biological activity against acetylcholine of our four synthesized bispyridinium salts was determined. Relationships/tendencies structure-activity were established. Several general conclusions were underlined.

[Burnout syndrome in different intensive care units]. / Síndrome de burnout en distintas Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of the professional burnout syndrome in health care personnel of different Intensive Care Units (ICUs). To know the association between burnout, its dimensions and sociodemographic-laboral variables. To compare the dimensions of burnout, characteristics of the personnel and of the patients of the different ICUs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analytic, comparative, cross-sectional study performed in the ICU of a tertiary hospital in November 2006 performed in a sample of 289 professionals. The Maslach Burnout Inventory questionnaire and sociodemographic-laboral variables were provided. The following were evaluated in the ICUs: Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS), Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score (NEMS), mortality, stay, isolations and travel of third parties. The chi2 test, Fischer test, Kruskall-Wallis test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used. RESULTS: A total of 73% of the workers answered. Ages ranged from 37 +/- 9 and 81% were women. The prevalence of burnout was 14%, this affecting 16% of the nurses, 14% of residents, 13% physicians and 10% auxiliary workers. Burnout was associated to low professional satisfactions, relationship with regular colleagues, low work recognition and time worked and experience in the ICU to high emotional tiredness, with a p < 0.05. In a polyvalent ICU, higher values of the following were obtained: TISS 42 +/- 11, NEMS 35 +/- 10, mortality 18%, stay 5 +/- 9, isolation 21%, burnout syndrome 17%, elevated emotional tiredness 49%, elevated depersonalization 63% and low professional performance 44%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of the burnout syndrome in our sample was 14%, those being affected most being the nursing professionals. We detected elevated levels of depersonalization and middle levels of emotional tiredness and professional performance. The variables related with professional burnout syndrome were low professional satisfaction, relationship with regular colleagues, low work recognition, and elevated emotional tiredness in the more expert personnel. The ICU with the greatest prevalence of burnout during the month studied attended patients with greater TISS, NEMS, mortality, stay and isolations.

Síndrome de burnout en distintas Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos / Burnout syndrome in different Intensive Care Units

Objetivos. Determinar la prevalencia del síndrome de desgaste profesional (burnout) enel personal sanitario de distintas Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI).Conocer la asociaciónentre el burnout, sus dimensiones y variables sociodemográficas-laborales. Comparardimensiones del burnout, características del personal y de los pacientes de distintas UCI.Material y métodos. Estudio analítico comparativo transversal, realizado en UCI de un hospitalterciario, en noviembre de 2006. La muestra fue 289 profesionales. Se entregó el cuestionarioMaslach Burnout Inventory y variables sociodemográficas-laborales. Se valoró en UCI:Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS), Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower UseScore (NEMS), mortalidad, estancia, aislamientos y desplazamientos terciarios. Se empleó laprueba de la χ2, Fischer, Kruskall-Wallis y análisis multivariable de regresión logística.Resultados. Contestaron el 73% de los trabajadores, edad 37 ± 9 y un 81% eran mujeres.Prevalencia de burnout 14%, afectados el 16% de enfermeros, 14% de residentes, 13% demédicos y 10% de auxiliares. El burnout se asoció a satisfacción profesional baja, relacióncon compañeros regular, reconocimiento laboral bajo, y tiempo trabajado y experienciaen UCI a un cansancio emocional elevado, con una p < 0,05. En la UCI Polivalente se obtuvieronvalores más elevados de: TISS 42 ± 11, NEMS 35 ± 10, mortalidad 18%, estancia5 ± 9, aislamientos 21%, síndrome burnout 17%, cansancio emocional elevado 49%, despersonalizaciónelevada 63% y realización profesional baja 44%.Conclusiones. La prevalencia del síndrome de burnout en nuestra muestra fue del 14%,siendo los profesionales de enfermería los más afectados. Detectamos niveles elevadosde despersonalización y niveles medios de cansancio emocional y de realización profesional.Las variables relacionadas con el (..) (AU)

Objectives. To determine the prevalence of the professional burnout syndrome inhealth care personnel of different Intensive Care Units (ICUs). To know the associationbetween burnout, its dimensions and sociodemographic-laboral variables. To comparethe dimensions of burnout, characteristics of the personnel and of the patients of thedifferent ICUs.Material and methods. Analytic, comparative, cross-sectional study performed in the ICUof a tertiary hospital in November 2006 performed in a sample of 289 professionals. TheMaslach Burnout Inventory questionnaire and sociodemographic-laboral variables wereprovided. The following were evaluated in the ICUs: Therapeutic Intervention ScoringSystem (TISS), Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score (NEMS), mortality, stay,isolations and travel of third parties. The χ2 test, Fischer test, Kruskall-Wallis test andmultivariate logistic regression analysis were used.Results. A total of 73% of the workers answered. Ages ranged from 37 ± 9 and 81% werewomen. The prevalence of burnout was 14%, this affecting 16% of the nurses, 14% ofresidents, 13% physicians and 10% auxiliary workers. Burnout was associated to lowprofessional satisfactions, relationship with regular colleagues, low work recognition andtime worked and experience in the ICU to high emotional tiredness, with a p < 0.05. In apolyvalent ICU, higher values of the following were obtained: TISS 42 ± 11, NEMS 35 ± 10,mortality 18%, stay 5 ± 9, isolation 21%, burnout syndrome 17%, elevated emotionaltiredness 49%, elevated depersonalization 63% and low professional performance 44%.Conclusions. The prevalence of the burnout syndrome in our sample was 14%, those beingaffected most being the nursing professionals. We detected elevated levels ofdepersonalization and middle levels of emotional tiredness and professional performance. (..) (AU)