The complex nature of CXCR4 mutations in WHIM syndrome.

Heterozygous autosomal dominant mutations in the CXCR4 gene cause WHIM syndrome, a severe combined immunodeficiency disorder. The mutations primarily affect the C-terminal region of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor, specifically several potential phosphorylation sites critical for agonist (CXCL12)-mediated receptor internalization and desensitization. Mutant receptors have a prolonged residence time on the cell surface, leading to hyperactive signaling that is responsible for some of the symptoms of WHIM syndrome. Recent studies have shown that the situation is more complex than originally thought, as mutant WHIM receptors and CXCR4 exhibit different dynamics at the cell membrane, which also influences their respective cellular functions. This review examines the functional mechanisms of CXCR4 and the impact of WHIM mutations in both physiological and pathological conditions.

G Protein-Coupled Receptors: A Century of Research and Discovery.

GPCRs (G protein-coupled receptors), also known as 7 transmembrane domain receptors, are the largest receptor family in the human genome, with ≈800 members. GPCRs regulate nearly every aspect of human physiology and disease, thus serving as important drug targets in cardiovascular disease. Sharing a conserved structure comprised of 7 transmembrane α-helices, GPCRs couple to heterotrimeric G-proteins, GPCR kinases, and ß-arrestins, promoting downstream signaling through second messengers and other intracellular signaling pathways. GPCR drug development has led to important cardiovascular therapies, such as antagonists of ß-adrenergic and angiotensin II receptors for heart failure and hypertension, and agonists of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor for reducing adverse cardiovascular events and other emerging indications. There continues to be a major interest in GPCR drug development in cardiovascular and cardiometabolic disease, driven by advances in GPCR mechanistic studies and structure-based drug design. This review recounts the rich history of GPCR research, including the current state of clinically used GPCR drugs, and highlights newly discovered aspects of GPCR biology and promising directions for future investigation. As additional mechanisms for regulating GPCR signaling are uncovered, new strategies for targeting these ubiquitous receptors hold tremendous promise for the field of cardiovascular medicine.

Roles of the gate loop in ß-arrestin-1 conformational dynamics and phosphorylated receptor interaction.

Arrestins interact with phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and regulate the homologous desensitization and internalization of GPCRs. The gate loop in arrestins is a critical region for both stabilization of the basal state and interaction with phosphorylated receptors. We investigated the roles of specific residues in the gate loop (K292, K294, and H295) using ß-arrestin-1 and phosphorylated C-tail peptide of vasopressin receptor type 2 (V2Rpp) as a model system. We measured the binding affinity of V2Rpp and analyzed conformational dynamics of ß-arrestin-1. Our results suggest that K294 plays a critical role in the interaction with V2Rpp without influencing the overall conformation of the V2Rpp-bound state. The residues K292 and H295 contribute to the stability of the polar core in the basal state and form a specific conformation of the finger loop in the V2Rpp-bound state.

MC4R variants modulate α-MSH and setmelanotide induced cellular signaling at multiple levels.

CONTEXT: Melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) plays an important role in body weight regulation. Pathogenic MC4R variants are the most common cause of monogenic obesity. OBJECTIVE: We have identified 17 MC4R variants in adult and pediatric patients with obesity. Here, we aimed to functionally characterize these variants by analyzing four different aspects of MC4R signaling. In addition, we aimed to analyze the effect of setmelanotide, a potent MC4R agonist, on these MC4R variants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cell surface expression and α-MSH- or setmelanotide-induced cAMP response, ß-arrestin-2 recruitment, and ERK activation were measured in cells expressing either wild type (WT) or variant MC4R. RESULTS: We found a large heterogeneity in the function of these variants. We identified variants with a loss of response for all studied MC4R signaling, variants with no cAMP accumulation or ERK activation but normal ß-arrestin-2 recruitment, and variants with normal cAMP accumulation and ERK activation but decreased ß-arrestin-2 recruitment, indicating disrupted desensitization and signaling mechanisms. Setmelanotide displayed a greater potency and similar efficacy as α-MSH, and induced significantly increased maximal cAMP responses of several variants compared to α-MSH. Despite the heterogeneity in functional response, there was no apparent difference in the obesity phenotype in our patients. DISCUSSION: We show that these obesity-associated MC4R variants affect MC4R signaling differently, yet leading to a comparable clinical phenotype. Our results demonstrate the clinical importance of assessing the effect of MC4R variants on a range of molecular signaling mechanisms to determine their association with obesity, which may aid in improving personalized treatment.

Arrestin-centred interactions at the membrane and their conformational determinants.

More than 30 years after their discovery, arrestins are recognised multiprotein scaffolds that play essential roles in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) regulation and signalling. Originally named for their capacity to hinder GPCR coupling to G proteins and facilitate receptor desensitisation, arrestins have emerged as key hubs for a myriad of other functions, including receptor internalisation and scaffolding of signalling complexes. Recent structural studies have started to provide snapshots of the complexes formed by GPCRs and arrestins, supporting a wealth of biochemical data delineating the molecular determinants of such interactions. Furthermore, biophysical techniques have also provided key information with regards to the basal and active conformations of arrestins, and how these are affected upon GPCR activation. Here, we review the most recent advances on our understanding of GPCR-arrestin complexes, from structure to interactions of arrestins with the lipid bilayer and other proteins. We also present an updated view on the development of tools to study the conformational flexibility of arrestins, with the potential to provide experimental data to describe the dynamic models of arrestin activation.

Somatostatin receptors and the associated intracellular machinery: the two sides of the coin.

Somatostatin receptors (SSTs) are widely expressed in pituitary tumors and neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of different origins, i.e. the gastrointestinal tract and the thorax (lungs and thymus), thus representing a well-established target for medical treatment with SST ligands (SRLs). However, the response to SRLs is highly heterogeneous between tumors. Two main factors can contribute to this variability: (i) the differential SST expression among tumor types and (ii) the differential expression/modulation of the SST-related intracellular machinery. In this literature review, we provide an overview of available data on the variable expression of SSTs in pituitary tumors and NENs, together with the resulting clinical implications. Moreover, we aim to describe the complex intracellular machinery involved in SST signaling and trafficking. Particularly, we will focus on ß-arrestins and describe their role in receptor internalization and recycling, as well as the various functions of these scaffold molecules in tumor pathogenesis and progression. This review highlights the interplay between membrane receptors and intracellular machinery, together with its role in determining the clinical behavior of the tumor and the response to treatment in patients with pituitary tumors or NENs.

G protein­mediated EGFR transactivation is a common mechanism through which the CXCL12 receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR7, control human cancer cell migration.

C­X­C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12) promotes metastasis of several tumors by affecting cell migration and invasion via its receptors, C­X­C chemokine receptor type (CXCR)4 and CXCR7. Current therapeutic approaches focus on the selective inactivation of either CXCR4 or CXCR7 in patients with cancer. Alternative strategies may emerge from the analysis of downstream events that mediate the migratory effects of CXCL12 in cancer cells. While CXCR4 activates cell signaling through both G proteins and arrestins, CXCR7 is believed to preferentially signal through arrestins. The present study analyzed the CXCL12­dependent chemotaxis of A549, C33A, DLD­1, MDA­MB­231 and PC­3 cells, in which either the activity of G proteins, EGFR or Src kinase was inhibited pharmacologically or the expression of arrestins was inhibited by RNA interference. The results demonstrated that CXCL12­induced migration of A549, C33A, DLD­1, MDA­MB­231 and PC­3 cells was attenuated by the Gαi/o­inhibitor pertussis toxin (PTX), but was unaffected by small interfering RNA­mediated gene silencing of ß­arrestin1/2. In particular, the sensitivity of DLD­1 migration to PTX was unexpected, as it is solely dependent on the non­classical chemokine receptor, CXCR7. Furthermore, chemotactic responses to CXCL12 were additionally prevented by inhibiting EGFR activity via AG1478 and Src kinase activity via Src inhibitor­1. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that G protein­ and Src­dependent transactivation of EGFR is a common mechanism through which CXCL12­bound CXCR4 and/or CXCR7 control cancer cell migration and metastasis. These findings highlight EGFR as a potential therapeutic target that interferes with CXCL12­induced cancer expansion.

Mechanism of action and potential therapeutic targets of ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 in liver diseases / 临床肝胆病杂志

Ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 （FSP1） is another major ferroptosis regulator besides glutathione peroxidase 4， which can scavenge intracellular reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxides and inhibit ferroptosis. In view of the key role of the liver in iron and lipid metabolism and its susceptibility to oxidative damage， more and more evidence has shown that FSP1 plays an important role in liver diseases such as metabolic associated fatty liver disease， hepatocellular carcinoma， acute liver failure， and alcoholic liver disease， and the related targets of FSP1 are expected to become a potential treatment option. This article comprehensively reviews FSP1， with a focus on the role of FSP1 in the pathophysiology of several common liver diseases and the potential of FSP1 as a target of liver diseases， in order to provide new ideas for the treatment of liver diseases.

Characterization of the real-time internalization of nine GPCRs reveals distinct dependence on arrestins and G proteins.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are seven transmembrane receptors that respond to external stimuli and undergo conformational changes to activate G proteins and modulate cellular processes leading to biological outcomes. To prevent overstimulation and prolonged exposure to stimuli, GPCRs are regulated by internalization. While the canonical GPCR internalization mechanism in mammalian cells is arrestin-dependent, clathrin-mediated endocytosis, more diverse GPCR internalization mechanisms have been described over the years. However, there is a lack of consistent methods used in the literature making it complicated to determine a receptor's internalization pathway. Here, we utilized a highly efficient time-resolved Förster resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) internalization assay to determine the internalization profile of nine distinct GPCRs representing the GPCR classes A, B and C and with different G protein coupling profiles. This technique, coupled with clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR) engineered knockout cells allows us to effectively study the involvement of heterotrimeric G proteins and non-visual arrestins. We found that all the nine receptors internalized upon agonist stimulation in a concentration-dependent manner and six receptors showed basal internalization. Yet, there is no correlation between the receptor class and primary G protein coupling to the arrestin and G protein dependence for GPCR internalization. Overall, this study presents a platform for studying internalization that is applicable to most GPCRs and may even be extended to other membrane proteins. This method can be easily applicable to other endocytic machinery of interest and ultimately will lend itself towards the construction of comprehensive receptor internalization profiles.

Molecular basis of anaphylatoxin binding, activation, and signaling bias at complement receptors.

The complement system is a critical part of our innate immune response, and the terminal products of this cascade, anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a, exert their physiological and pathophysiological responses primarily via two GPCRs, C3aR and C5aR1. However, the molecular mechanism of ligand recognition, activation, and signaling bias of these receptors remains mostly elusive. Here, we present nine cryo-EM structures of C3aR and C5aR1 activated by their natural and synthetic agonists, which reveal distinct binding pocket topologies of complement anaphylatoxins and provide key insights into receptor activation and transducer coupling. We also uncover the structural basis of a naturally occurring mechanism to dampen the inflammatory response of C5a via proteolytic cleavage of the terminal arginine and the G-protein signaling bias elicited by a peptide agonist of C3aR identified here. In summary, our study elucidates the innerworkings of the complement anaphylatoxin receptors and should facilitate structure-guided drug discovery to target these receptors in a spectrum of disorders.

Structures of the arginine-vasopressin and oxytocin receptor signaling complexes.

Arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OT) are neurohypophysial hormones which share a high sequence and structure homology. These are two cyclic C-terminally amidated nonapeptides with different residues at position 3 and 8. In mammals, AVP and OT exert their multiple biological functions through a specific G protein-coupled receptor family: four receptors are identified, the V1a, V1b, V2 receptors (V1aR, V1bR and V2R) and the OT receptor (OTR). The chemical structure of AVP and OT was elucidated in the early 1950s. Thanks to X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy, it took however 70 additional years to determine the three-dimensional structures of the OTR and the V2R in complex with their natural agonist ligands and with different signaling partners, G proteins and ß-arrestins. Today, the comparison of the different AVP/OT receptor structures gives structural insights into their orthosteric ligand binding pocket, their molecular mechanisms of activation, and their interfaces with canonical Gs, Gq and ß-arrestin proteins. It also paves the way to future rational drug design and therapeutic compound development. Indeed, agonist, antagonist, biased agonist, or pharmacological chaperone analogues of AVP and OT are promising candidates to regulate different physiological functions and treat several pathologies.

G protein-receptor kinases 5/6 are the key regulators of G protein-coupled receptor 35-arrestin interactions.

Human G protein-coupled receptor 35 is regulated by agonist-mediated phosphorylation of a set of five phospho-acceptor amino acids within its C-terminal tail. Alteration of both Ser300 and Ser303 to alanine in the GPR35a isoform greatly reduces the ability of receptor agonists to promote interactions with arrestin adapter proteins. Here, we have integrated the use of cell lines genome edited to lack expression of combinations of G protein receptor kinases (GRKs), selective small molecule inhibitors of subsets of these kinases, and antisera able to specifically identify either human GPR35a or mouse GPR35 only when Ser300 and Ser303 (orce; the equivalent residues in mouse GPR35) have become phosphorylated to demonstrate that GRK5 and GRK6 cause agonist-dependent phosphorylation of these residues. Extensions of these studies demonstrated the importance of the GRK5/6-mediated phosphorylation of these amino acids for agonist-induced internalization of the receptor. Homology and predictive modeling of the interaction of human GPR35 with GRKs showed that the N terminus of GRK5 is likely to dock in the same methionine pocket on the intracellular face of GPR35 as the C terminus of the α5 helix of Gα13 and, that while this is also the case for GRK6, GRK2 and GRK3 are unable to do so effectively. These studies provide unique and wide-ranging insights into modes of regulation of GPR35, a receptor that is currently attracting considerable interest as a novel therapeutic target in diseases including ulcerative colitis.

Depletion of pyruvate kinase (PK) activity causes glycolytic intermediate imbalances and reveals a PK-TXNIP regulatory axis.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer cells convert more glucose into lactate than healthy cells, what contributes to their growth advantage. Pyruvate kinase (PK) is a key rate limiting enzyme in this process, what makes it a promising potential therapeutic target. However, currently it is still unclear what consequences the inhibition of PK has on cellular processes. Here, we systematically investigate the consequences of PK depletion for gene expression, histone modifications and metabolism. METHODS: Epigenetic, transcriptional and metabolic targets were analysed in different cellular and animal models with stable knockdown or knockout of PK. RESULTS: Depleting PK activity reduces the glycolytic flux and causes accumulation of glucose-6-phosphate (G6P). Such metabolic perturbation results in stimulation of the activity of a heterodimeric pair of transcription factors MondoA and MLX but not in a major reprogramming of the global H3K9ac and H3K4me3 histone modification landscape. The MondoA:MLX heterodimer upregulates expression of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) - a tumour suppressor with multifaceted anticancer activity. This effect of TXNIP upregulation extends beyond immortalised cancer cell lines and is applicable to multiple cellular and animal models. CONCLUSIONS: Our work shows that actions of often pro-tumorigenic PK and anti-tumorigenic TXNIP are tightly linked via a glycolytic intermediate. We suggest that PK depletion stimulates the activity of MondoA:MLX transcription factor heterodimers and subsequently, increases cellular TXNIP levels. TXNIP-mediated inhibition of thioredoxin (TXN) can reduce the ability of cells to scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to the oxidative damage of cellular structures including DNA. These findings highlight an important regulatory axis affecting tumour suppression mechanisms and provide an attractive opportunity for combination cancer therapies targeting glycolytic activity and ROS-generating pathways.

Art2 mediates selective endocytosis of methionine transporters during adaptation to sphingolipid depletion.

Accumulating evidence in several model organisms indicates that reduced sphingolipid biosynthesis promotes longevity, although underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In yeast, sphingolipid depletion induces a state resembling amino acid restriction, which we hypothesized might be due to altered stability of amino acid transporters at the plasma membrane. To test this, we measured surface abundance for a diverse panel of membrane proteins in the presence of myriocin, a sphingolipid biosynthesis inhibitor, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Unexpectedly, we found that surface levels of most proteins examined were either unaffected or increased during myriocin treatment, consistent with an observed decrease in bulk endocytosis. In contrast, sphingolipid depletion triggered selective endocytosis of the methionine transporter Mup1. Unlike methionine-induced Mup1 endocytosis, myriocin triggered Mup1 endocytosis that required the Rsp5 adaptor Art2, C-terminal lysine residues of Mup1 and the formation of K63-linked ubiquitin polymers. These findings reveal cellular adaptation to sphingolipid depletion by ubiquitin-mediated remodeling of nutrient transporter composition at the cell surface.

ß-arrestin1 regulates astrocytic reactivity via Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission: implications in postoperative delirium.

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent and debilitating complication, especially amongst high risk procedures, such as orthopedic surgery. This kind of neurocognitive disorder negatively affects cognitive domains, such as memory, awareness, attention, and concentration after surgery; however, its pathophysiology remains unknown. Multiple lines of evidence supporting the occurrence of inflammatory events have come forward from studies in human patients' brain and bio-fluids (CSF and serum), as well as in animal models for POD. ß-arrestins are downstream molecules of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs). As versatile proteins, they regulate numerous pathophysiological processes of inflammatory diseases by scaffolding with inflammation-linked partners. Here we report that ß-arrestin1, one type of ß-arrestins, decreases significantly in the reactive astrocytes of a mouse model for POD. Using ß-arrestin1 knockout (KO) mice, we find aggravating effect of ß-arrestin1 deficiency on the cognitive dysfunctions and inflammatory phenotype of astrocytes in POD model mice. We conduct the in vitro experiments to investigate the regulatory roles of ß-arrestin1 and demonstrate that ß-arrestin1 in astrocytes interacts with the dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) to regulate mitochondrial fusion/fission process. ß-arrestin1 deletion cancels the combination of ß-arrestin1 and cellular Drp1, thus promoting the translocation of Drp1 to mitochondrial membrane to provoke the mitochondrial fragments and the subsequent mitochondrial malfunctions. Using ß-arrestin1-biased agonist, cognitive dysfunctions of POD mice and pathogenic activation of astrocytes in the POD-linked brain region are reduced. We, therefore, conclude that ß-arrestin1 is a promising target for the understanding of POD pathology and development of POD therapeutics.

Structural snapshots uncover a key phosphorylation motif in GPCRs driving ß-arrestin activation.

Agonist-induced GPCR phosphorylation is a key determinant for the binding and activation of ß-arrestins (ßarrs). However, it is not entirely clear how different GPCRs harboring divergent phosphorylation patterns impart converging active conformation on ßarrs leading to broadly conserved functional responses such as desensitization, endocytosis, and signaling. Here, we present multiple cryo-EM structures of activated ßarrs in complex with distinct phosphorylation patterns derived from the carboxyl terminus of different GPCRs. These structures help identify a P-X-P-P type phosphorylation motif in GPCRs that interacts with a spatially organized K-K-R-R-K-K sequence in the N-domain of ßarrs. Sequence analysis of the human GPCRome reveals the presence of this phosphorylation pattern in a large number of receptors, and its contribution in ßarr activation is demonstrated by targeted mutagenesis experiments combined with an intrabody-based conformational sensor. Taken together, our findings provide important structural insights into the ability of distinct GPCRs to activate ßarrs through a significantly conserved mechanism.

A streamlined protocol for expression and purification of wild-type ß-arrestins.

The two isoforms of ß-arrestins namely ß-arrestin 1 and 2 interact with, and regulate a broad repertoire of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). While several protocols have been described in the literature for purification of ß-arrestins for biochemical and biophysical studies, some of these protocols involve multiple complicated steps that prolong the process and yield relatively smaller amounts of purified proteins. Here, we describe a simplified and streamlined protocol for expression and purification of ß-arrestins using E. coli as an expression host. This protocol is based on N-terminal fusion of GST tag and involves a two-step protocol involving GST-based affinity chromatography and size exclusion chromatography. The protocol described here yields sufficient amounts of high-quality purified ß-arrestins suitable for biochemical and structural studies.

Toxicity and assimilation of cellulosic copper nanoparticles require α-arrestins in S. cerevisiae.

The increased use of antimicrobial compounds such as copper into nanoparticles changes how living cells interact with these novel materials. The increased use of antimicrobial nanomaterials combats infectious disease and food spoilage. Fungal infections are particularly difficult to treat because of the few druggable targets, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae provides an insightful model organism to test these new materials. However, because of the novel characteristics of these materials, it is unclear how these materials interact with living cells and if resistance to copper-based nanomaterials could occur. Copper nanoparticles built on carboxymethylcellulose microfibril strands with copper (CMC-Cu) are a promising nanomaterial when imported into yeast cells and induce cell death. The α-arrestins are cargo adaptors that select which molecules are imported into eukaryotic cells. We screened α-arrestins mutants and identified Aly2, Rim8, and Rog3 α-arrestins, which are necessary for the internalization of CMC-Cu nanoparticles. Internal reactive oxygen species in these mutants were lower and corresponded to the increased viability in the presence of CMC-Cu. Using lattice light-sheet microscopy on live cells, we determined that CMC-Cu were imported into yeast within 30 min of exposure. Initially, the cytoplasmic pH decreased but returned to basal level 90 min later. However, there was heterogeneity in response to CMC-Cu exposure, which could be due to the heterogeneity of the particles or differences in the metabolic states within the population. When yeast were exposed to sublethal concentrations of CMC-Cu no resistance occurred. Internalization of CMC-Cu increases the potency of these antimicrobial nanomaterials and is likely key to preventing fungi from evolving resistance.

Internalization of somatostatin receptors in brain and periphery.

Somatostatin (SRIF) is a neuropeptide that acts as an important regulator of both endocrine and exocrine secretion and modulates neurotransmission in the central nervous system (CNS). SRIF also regulates cell proliferation in normal tissues and tumors. The physiological actions of SRIF are mediated by a family of five G protein-coupled receptors, called somatostatin receptor (SST) SST1, SST2, SST3, SST4, SST5. These five receptors share similar molecular structure and signaling pathways but they display marked differences in their anatomical distribution, subcellular localization and intracellular trafficking. The SST subtypes are widely distributed in the CNS and peripheral nervous system, in many endocrine glands and tumors, particularly of neuroendocrine origin. In this review, we focus on the agonist-dependent internalization and recycling of the different SST subtypes in vivo in the CNS, peripheral organs and tumors. We also discuss the physiological, pathophysiological and potential therapeutic effects of the intracellular trafficking of SST subtypes.

Structural snapshot of a ß-arrestin-biased receptor.

Atypical chemokine receptor subtype 3 (ACKR3), a chemokine receptor, couples selectively to ß-arrestins (ßarrs) but not to G proteins despite having seven transmembrane (7TM) helix architecture. Yen et al. present cryogenic-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of agonist-bound ACKR3, elucidating a distinct chemokine-binding mechanism, and offering a structural template to probe the transducer-coupling bias at this receptor.