Femoral version and its clinical relevance in adult hip preservation surgery for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Femoral version (FV) is more widely adopted with the definition as the angle between the long axis of the femoral neck and the tangent line of the posterior femoral condyles on the axial plane, and the normal range between 5 and 20°. FV can be measured by imaging and functional tests. Cross-sectional CT including both the hip and the knee is the typically used imaging technique, yet variation exists according to the different landmarks used. As MRI investigations are routinely performed preoperatively, and protocols can be easily adopted to include version measurement, they are frequently used as an alternative to CT and offers several advantages. Abnormal FV has adverse effects on the biomechanics and musculoskeletal health of the whole lower limb. It affects the lever arm of muscles and the forces that the hip and patellofemoral joints suffer, and can lead to disorders such as osteoarthritis and impingement. In adult hip preservation surgery for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), abnormal FV is sometimes accompanied by other morphological abnormities of the hip, a more severe DDH, and can help predict postoperative range of motion (ROM), and postoperative impingement. Currently, the most frequently used surgical technique for abnormal FV is femoral derotational osteotomy. Many controversies are left to be solved, including the specific origin of FV, the indication for femoral derotational osteotomy, especially in patients with combined DDH and abnormal FV, and the explicit compensation mechanism of abnormal FV by tibial torsion.

Walking and Running of Children with Decreased Femoral Torsion.

Understanding the implications of decreased femoral torsion on gait and running in children and adolescents might help orthopedic surgeons optimize treatment decisions. To date, there is limited evidence regarding the kinematic gait deviations between children with decreased femoral torsion and typically developing children, as well as the implications of the same on the adaptation of walking to running. A three-dimensional gait analysis study was undertaken to compare gait deviations during running and walking among patients with decreased femoral torsion (n = 15) and typically developing children (n = 11). Linear mixed models were utilized to establish comparisons within and between the two groups and investigate the relationship between clinical examination, spatial parameters, and the difference in hip rotation between running and walking. Patients exhibited increased external hip rotation during walking in comparison to controls, accompanied by higher peaks for the same as well as for knee valgus and external foot progression angle. A similar kinematic gait pattern was observed during running, with significant differences noted in peak knee valgus. In terms of variations from running to walking, patients internally rotated their initially externally rotated hip by 4°, whereas controls maintained the same internal hip rotation. Patients and controls displayed comparable kinematic gait deviations during running compared to walking. The passive hip range of motion, torsions, and velocity did not notably influence the variation in mean hip rotation from running to walking. This study underlines the potential of 3D gait kinematics to elucidate the functional implications of decreased FT and, hence, may contribute to clinical decision making.

Significant difference in femoral torsion between coronal plane alignment of the knee type 1 and 4.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to find out whether the torsions of the femur and tibia are dependent on the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) type. METHODS: Five hundred patients (1000 legs) were included, who received a whole leg standing three-dimensional (3D) radiograph using EOS imaging (EOS Imaging, Paris, France). SterEOS software was used for digital reconstruction. Femoral and tibial torsions were determined by analysing 3D reconstructions of each leg. Femoral torsion was defined as the angle between the femoral neck axis (FNA) and the posterior condylar axis (PCA). Tibial torsion was defined as the angle between the axis tangent to the posterior part of the tibia plateau and the transmalleolar axis. Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint-line obliquity (JLO) were also determined, allowing each leg to be assigned one of nine possible phenotypes according to CPAK. RESULTS: The mean femoral torsion in CPAK type 1 was significantly higher (+ 2.6° ± 0.8°) than in CPAK type 4 (p = 0.02). All other CPAK types did not differ in the degree of femoral torsions. No differences could be demonstrated for the tibial torsion. CONCLUSION: There is a correlation between the coronal alignment of the lower limb and femoral torsion. This may provide the basis for extending the CPAK classification beyond the coronal plane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Increased knee torsional misalignment associated with femoral torsion is related to non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Altered axial biomechanics of the knee are recognized as a risk factor for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, the relationship of knee and segmental torsion to non-contact ACL and combined anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury is unclear. This study aims to determine the relationship of knee and segmental torsion to non-contact ACL injury and to explore their relationship with ALL injuries. METHODS: We divided 122 patients with arthroscopically confirmed non-contact ACL injuries into an ACL injury group (isolated ACL injury, 63 patients) and an ACL + ALL injury group (ACL combined with ALL injury,59 patients). Additionally, 90 normal patients with similar age, gender and body mass index (BMI) were matched as a control group. The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, distal femoral torsion (DFT), posterior femoral condylar torsion (PFCT) and proximal tibial torsion (PTT) were measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We assessed the differences between the groups using an independent samples t test and utilized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine the cut-off value for the increased risk of ACL injury. RESULTS: In patients with ACL injury, the measurements of the TT-TG (11.8 ± 3.1 mm), DFT (7.7° ± 3.5°) and PFCT (3.6° ± 1.3°) were significantly higher compared to the control group (9.1 ± 2.4 mm, 6.3° ± 2.7° and 2.8° ± 1.3°, respectively; P < 0.05), but the PTT did not differ between the two groups. The TT-TG, DFT and PFCT were not significantly larger in patients combined with ALL injury. ROC curve analysis revealed ACL injury is associated with TT-TG, DFT and PFCT. CONCLUSIONS: Knee torsional alignment is associated with ACL injury, predominantly in the distal femur rather than the proximal tibia. However, its correlation with ALL injury remains unclear. These findings may help identify patients at high risk for non-contact ACL injury and inform the development of targeted prevention and treatment strategies.

Clinical outcomes of derotational femoral osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in patients with patellar dislocation and increased femoral anteversion unaffected by the pattern of distribution of femoral torsion.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effect of derotational femoral osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar dislocation and the effect of the distribution of femoral torsion at different segments on postoperative function. METHODS: Forty-two patients with patellar dislocation who underwent derotational femoral osteotomy from 2017 to 2021 were retrospectively analysed. All patients received computed tomography scans from the hip to the knee to evaluate correction of the femoral anteversion (FA) angle, patellar tilt angle (PTA) and congruence angle (CA) after derotational femoral osteotomy. Subjective scores, such as the Kujala, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, were used to evaluate knee function before and after the operation. Patients with supracondylar torsion > distal torsion were categorized into the supracondylar torsion group and patients with distal torsion > supracondylar torsion were categorized into the distal torsion group. Subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: No presentation of redislocation occurred in these patients at the minimum 2-year follow-up visit. The mean preoperative FA angle in the supracondylar torsion group was 30.2° ± 4.2°, and the mean postoperative FA angle was 14.5° ± 2.5° (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative FA angle was 26.7° ± 1.4° and the mean postoperative FA angle was 14.1° ± 1.4° in the distal torsion group. In addition, postoperative PTA and CA were significantly corrected in both groups (p < 0.001). The postoperative Kujala, Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner and VAS scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed a higher preoperative FA in the supracondylar torsion group and a higher occurrence of high-grade trochlear dysplasia in the distal torsion group. However, there was no significant difference in their postoperative clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Through a minimum of 2-year follow-up visits of patients with patellar dislocation and increased FA, it was found that derotational femoral osteotomy could significantly reduce FA and improve subjective knee function. The pattern of torsion distribution did not significantly affect the clinical outcomes of derotational femoral osteotomy. These findings readvised orthopaedic surgeons that derotational femoral osteotomy remains the preferred procedure for correcting rotational malalignment, but that they should be more cautious about its indications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The quest for optimal femoral torsion angle measurements: a comparative advanced 3D study defining the femoral neck axis.

PURPOSE: There is high variability in femoral torsion, measured on two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) scans. The aim of this study was to find a reliable three-dimensional (3D) femoral torsion measurement method, assess the influence of CAM deformity on femoral torsion measurement, and to promote awareness for the used measurement method. METHODS: 3D models of 102 dry femur specimens were divided into a CAM and non-CAM group. Femoral torsion was measured by one 2D-CT method described by Murphy et al. (method 0) and five 3D methods. The 3D methods differed in strategies to define the femoral neck axis. Method 1 is based on an elliptical least-square fit at the middle of the femoral neck. Methods 2 and 3 defined the centre of mass of the entire femoral neck and of the most cylindrical part, respectively. Methods 4 and 5 were based on the intersection of the femoral neck with a 25% and 40% enlarged best fit sphere of the femoral head. RESULTS: 3D methods resulted in higher femoral torsion measures than the 2D method; the mean torsion for method 0 was 8.12° ± 7.30°, compared to 9.93° ± 8.24° (p < 0.001), 13.21° ± 8.60° (p < 0.001), 8.21° ± 7.64° (p = 1.00), 9.53° ± 7.87° (p < 0.001) and 10.46° ± 7.83° (p < 0.001) for methods 1 to 5 respectively. In the presence of a CAM, torsion measured with method 4 is consistently smaller than measured with method 5. CONCLUSION: 2D measurement might underestimate true femoral torsion and there is a difference up to 5°. There is a tendency for a higher mean torsion in hips with a CAM deformity. Methods 4 and 5 are the most robust techniques. However, method 4 might underestimate femoral torsion if a CAM deformity is present. Since method 5 is independent of a CAM deformity, it is the preferred technique to define expected values of torsion.

Distal femoral torsion is correlated with higher-grade trochlear dysplasia and shorter anterior condyles in patients with patellar dislocation and increased femoral torsion.

PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics of femoral torsion in patients with different segmental torsion types and to evaluate the correlations between segmental torsion and the morphology of the femoral condyles and trochlea in patients with patellar dislocation and increased femoral torsion. METHODS: Between January 2021 and March 2023, 69 patients were included and classified into two groups according to the femoral segment contributing the most to total torsion: 32 patients in Group A (femoral neck and shaft torsion) and 37 patients in Group B (distal torsion). Trochlear dysplasia was evaluated using Dejour's classification and sulcus angle. The morphology of the femoral condyles was evaluated using the lengths and ratios of the medial and lateral condyles. Correlations between femoral torsion and morphology were evaluated. RESULTS: Total torsion was significantly correlated with femoral neck and shaft torsion (r = 0.882, P < 0.001) and distal torsion (r = 0.262, P = 0.030). Femoral neck and shaft torsion was significantly increased with increasing total torsion. The trochlear sulcus was flatter and more dysplastic, and the anterior condyles were shorter in Group B. Distal torsion was significantly correlated with the lengths of the medial and lateral anterior condyles (r = - 0.567, P < 0.001; r = -0.701, P < 0.001), sulcus angle (r = 0.611, P < 0.001) and Dejour trochlea type (r = 0.512, P = 0.001), while femoral neck and shaft torsion showed no correlations. CONCLUSION: Femoral torsion is a complex of femoral neck and shaft torsion and distal torsion, especially femoral neck and shaft torsion. Distal torsion was significantly correlated with a flatter trochlear sulcus, higher-grade trochlear dysplasia, and shorter anterior condyles. The new findings highlighted the importance of the segmental evaluation of femoral torsion, which would facilitate understanding of the anatomical characteristics of femoral torsion in patients with patellar dislocation and increased femoral torsion and may lead to improvement in the surgical options regarding femoral torsion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

[Femoroacetabular impingement in adolescents]. / Femoroazetabuläres Impingement beim Jugendlichen und Adoleszenten.

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is caused by a repetitive mechanical conflict between the acetabulum and the proximal femur, occurring in flexion and internal rotation. In cam impingement, bony prominences of the femoral head-neck junction induce chondrolabral damage. The acetabular type of FAIS, termed pincer FAIS, may be either due to focal or global retroversion and/or acetabular overcoverage. Combinations of cam and pincer morphology are common. Pathological femoral torsion may aggravate or decrease the mechanical conflict in FAI but can also occur in isolation. Of note, a high percentage of adolescents with FAI-like shape changes remain asymptomatic. The diagnosis of FAIS is therefore made clinically, whereas imaging reveals the underlying morphology. X­rays in two planes remain the primary imaging modality, the exact evaluation of the osseous deformities of the femur and chondrolabral damage is assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Acetabular coverage and version are primarily assessed on radiographs. Evaluation of the entire circumference of the proximal femur warrants MRI which is further used in the assessment of chondrolabral lesions, and also bone marrow and adjacent soft tissue abnormalities. The MRI protocol should routinely include measurements of femoral torsion. Fluid-sensitive sequences should be acquired to rule out degenerative or inflammatory extra-articular changes.

Virtual 3D femur model to assess femoral version: comparison to the 2D axial slice approach.

BACKGROUND: Quantifying femoral version is crucial in diagnosing femoral version abnormalities and for accurate pre-surgical planning. There are numerous methods for measuring femoral version, however, reliability studies for most of these methods excluded children with hip deformities. OBJECTIVE: To propose a method of measuring femoral version based on a virtual 3D femur model, and systematically compare its reliability to the widely used Murphy's 2D axial slice technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched our imaging database to identify hip/femur CTs performed on children (<18 years old) with a clinical indication of femoral version measurement (September 2021-August 2022). Exclusion criteria were prior hip surgery, and inadequate image quality or field-of-view. Two blinded radiologists independently measured femoral version using the virtual 3D femur model and Murphy's 2D axial slice method. To assess intrareader variability, we randomly selected 20% of the study sample for re-measurements by the two radiologists >2 weeks later. We analyzed the reliability and correlation of these techniques via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and deformity subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Our study sample consisted of 142 femurs from 71 patients (10.6±4.4 years, male=31). Intra- and inter-reader correlations for both techniques were excellent (ICC≥0.91). However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the standard deviation (SD) of the absolute difference between the two radiologists for the Murphy method (mean 13.7°) was larger than that of the 3D femur model technique (mean 4.8°), indicating higher reader variability. In femurs with hip flexion deformity, the SD of the absolute difference for the Murphy technique was 17°, compared to 6.5° for the 3D femur model technique. In femurs with apparent coxa valga deformity, the SD of the absolute difference for the Murphy technique was 10.4°, compared to 5.2° for the 3D femur model technique. CONCLUSION: The 3D femur model technique is more reliable than the Murphy's 2D axial slice technique in measuring femoral version, especially in children with hip flexion and apparent coxa valga deformities.

Association Between Femoral Anteversion and Distal Femoral Morphology in Patients With Patellar Dislocation and Trochlear Dysplasia.

Background: Increased femoral anteversion (FA) is reportedly associated with patellar dislocation (PD) and trochlear dysplasia (TD), and the increase in FA may occur at different segments of the femur. In addition, TD is associated with dysplasia of the posterior femoral condyle. Among patients with PD, whether FA is greater with or without TD remains unclear. Purpose: To explore differences in FA and torsion distribution at different femoral sections among patients with PD and TD, patients with PD and no TD, and sex- and age-matched controls and to investigate the association between FA and distal femoral morphology. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study involved 132 knees: 44 knees with PD and TD, 44 knees with PD but no TD, and 44 control knees. FA, proximal torsion (PT), middle torsion (MT), distal torsion (DT), and distal femoral morphology were measured. Differences were investigated by 1-way analysis of variance. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to explore the association between FA and each parameter. Results: FA was significantly larger in the PD with TD group (25.4° ± 4.7°) than in the other groups (controls: 18.9° ± 5.6°; PD without TD: 19.9° ± 4.8°) (P < .01). DT was significantly larger in the PD with TD group (15.8° ± 2.9°) than in the other groups (controls: 9.0° ± 4.3°; PD without TD: 8.8° ± 3.9°) (P < .01). In all 3 groups, FA was strongly positively correlated with DT (control, PD without TD, and PD with TD, respectively: r = 0.76, 0.80, and 0.88; P < .01), strongly positively correlated with the posteromedial condylar length (r = 0.48, 0.48, and 0.70; P < .01) and negatively correlated with the posterolateral condylar length (r = -0.30, -0.35, and -0.78, respectively; P < .05). Conclusion: The increased FA in knees with TD was due mainly to DT rather than PT or MT, which may provide a reference for choosing the optimal position for femoral derotation osteotomy.

Posterior Hip Impingement at Maximal Hip Extension in Female Patients With Increased Femoral Version or Increased McKibbin Index and Its Effect on Sports Performance.

Background: The location of posterior hip impingement at maximal extension in patients with posterior femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is unclear. Purpose: To investigate the frequency and area of impingement at maximal hip extension and at 10° and 20° of extension in female patients with increased femoral version (FV) and posterior hip pain. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Osseous patient-specific 3-dimensional (3D) models were generated of 50 hips (37 female patients, 3D computed tomography) with a positive posterior impingement test and increased FV (defined as >35°). The McKibbin index (combined version) was calculated as the sum of FV and acetabular version (AV). Subgroups of patients with an increased McKibbin index >70° (24 hips) and FV >50° (20 hips) were analyzed. A control group of female participants (10 hips) had normal FV, normal AV, and no valgus deformity (neck-shaft angle, <139°). Validated 3D collision detection software was used for simulation of osseous impingement-free hip extension (no rotation). Results: The mean impingement-free maximal hip extension was significantly lower in patients with FV >35° compared with the control group (15° ± 15° vs 55° ± 19°; P < .001). At maximal hip extension, 78% of patients with FV >35° had osseous posterior extra-articular ischiofemoral hip impingement. At 20° of extension, the frequency of posterior extra-articular ischiofemoral impingement was significantly higher for patients with a McKibbin index >70° (83%) and for patients with FV >35° (76%) than for controls (0%) (P < .001 for both). There was a significant correlation between maximal extension (no rotation) and FV (r = 0.46; P < .001) as well as between impingement area at 20° of extension (external rotation [ER], 0°) and McKibbin index (0.61; P < .001). Impingement area at 20° of extension (ER, 0°) was significantly larger for patients with McKibbin index >70° versus <70° (251 vs 44 mm2; P = .001). Conclusion: The limited hip extension found in our study could theoretically affect the performance of sports activities such as running, ballet dancing, or lunges. Therefore, although not examined directly in this study, these activities are not advisable for these patients. Preoperative evaluation of FV and the McKibbin index is important in female patients with posterior hip pain before hip preservation surgery (eg, hip arthroscopy).

Effect of Lower Extremity Torsion on Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction and Tibial Tubercle Transfer for Recurrent Patellofemoral Instability.

BACKGROUND: Increased femoral torsion (FT) or tibial torsion (TT) has been suggested to be a potential risk factor for recurrent patellofemoral instability. However, the influence of increased FT or TT on the postoperative clinical outcomes of recurrent patellofemoral instability has rarely been investigated. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of increased FT or TT on postoperative results in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability after combined medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and tibial tubercle transfer, along with the influence of other risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Out of 91 patients, the study's analyses included 86 patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability who were treated with MPFLR and tibial tubercle transfer and enrolled between April 2020 and January 2021. FT and TT were assessed using preoperative computed tomography images. According to the torsion value of FT or TT, patients were categorized into 3 groups for each of FT and TT: group A (<20°), group B (20°-30°), and group C (>30°). Patellar height, femoral trochlear dysplasia, and the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance were also assessed. Patient-reported outcome scores (Tegner, Kujala, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Lysholm, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Clinical failure of MPFLR was recorded. Subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of increased FT or TT on the postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up time of 25 months. At the final follow-up, all functional scores improved significantly. Patella alta, high-grade trochlear dysplasia, and increased TT-TG distance did not have any significant effect on the postoperative functional scores. Regarding FT, subgroup analysis indicated that all functional scores of group C were lower than those of groups A and B except the KOOS knee-related Quality of Life score. For TT, group C had lower scores than group A for all functional outcomes except Tegner and KOOS Quality of Life and lower scores than group B for Kujala, IKDC, KOOS (Symptoms and Sport and Recreation subscales), Tegner, and Lysholm scores. The comparison between group A and group B, whether for FT or TT, revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: For patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, increased lower extremity torsion (FT or TT >30°) was associated with inferior postoperative clinical outcomes after combined MPFLR and tibial tubercle transfer.

Effect of Differing Orientation and Magnitude of Femoral Torsion on Outcomes and Achievement of the MCID and PASS at 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Femoral torsion measurements and outcomes are variable throughout the literature and have focused on short-term follow-up. However, there is a paucity of literature investigating clinically meaningful outcomes at midterm follow-up after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). PURPOSE: To quantify femoral version using computed tomography imaging in patients with FAIS and to explore the relationship between version abnormalities and 5-year outcomes after hip arthroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and November 2017 were identified. Patients were included if they had 5-year follow-up with completion of ≥1 patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores and excluded if they had Tönnis grade >1, revision hip surgery, a concomitant hip procedure, a developmental disorder, or a lateral center-edge angle <20°. Torsion groups were defined as severe retrotorsion (<0°), moderate retrotorsion (0.1°-5°), normal torsion (5.1°-20°), moderate antetorsion (20.1°-25°), and severe antetorsion (>25.1°) based on computed tomography measurements. Patient characteristics were analyzed among the torsion cohorts, as were preoperative and 5-year PROs: Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, international Hip Outcome Tool, visual analog scale for pain, and visual analog scale for satisfaction. Achievement rates of cohort-specific thresholds for the minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State were calculated and compared among cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 362 patients (244 female, 118 male; mean ± SD age, 33.1 ± 11.5 years; body mass index, 26.9 ± 17.8) met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were analyzed at a final mean follow-up of 64.3 ± 9.4 months (range, 53.5-115.5 months). Mean femoral torsion was 12.8°± 9.2°. The number of patients within each group was 20 for severe retrotorsion (torsion, -6.3°± 4.9°), 45 for moderate retrotorsion (2.7°± 1.3°), 219 for normal torsion (12.2°± 4.1°), 39 for moderate antetorsion (21.9°± 1.3°), and 39 for severe antetorsion (29.0°± 4.2°). No significant differences in age, body mass index, sex, smoking status, workers' compensation, psychiatric history, back pain, or physical activity were found among the torsional groups. All groups demonstrated significant improvements at 5 years postoperatively (P < .01 for all). All torsion subgroups demonstrated similar pre- to postoperative changes in PROs (P≥ .515) and PRO values at 5-year follow-up (P≥ .098). There were no significant differences in the achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (P≥ .422) or Patient Acceptable Symptom State (P≥ .161) for any of the PROs among the torsion groups. CONCLUSION: The orientation and severity of femoral torsion at the time of hip arthroscopy for FAIS in this study's cohort did not affect the propensity for clinically meaningful outcome improvement at midterm follow-up.

Study on the correlation between the severity of patellofemoral arthritis and the morphology of the distal femur.

PURPOSE: Distal femoral torsion is a key factor for poor alignment of patellofemoral joint. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between distal femoral torsion and the severity of patellofemoral arthritis, and to analyze the correlation between distal femoral torsion and the morphology of femoral condyle. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 125 patients awaiting surgical treatment for knee osteoarthritis from January 2021 to March 2022(79 females, 46 males, average age: 65.78 years, SD 6.61). All patients underwent knee joint radiography, lower-limb digital radiography, and knee joint CT scans. The ratio of length of each distal femoral condyle, TT-TG, patellar tilt, DFL-PCL, DFL-TEA, TEA-PCL and TEA-ACL were measured. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between distal femoral torsion and ratio of distal femoral condyle, TT-TG and patellar tilt. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the correlation between each parameter and the severity of PFOA. RESULTS: With the increased severity of PFOA, TT-TG, patellar tilt, DFL-PCL, DFL-TEA and PCA all tended to increase. Patellar tilt was correlated with DFL-PCL (r = 0.243) and TEA-PCL(r = 0.201), but TT-TG had no evident correlation with distal femoral torsion. Compared with Grade I patients of PFOA, DFL-PCL, DFL-TEA, and TEA-PCL were risk factors for increased severity of patellofemoral arthritis in Grade III patients of PFOA, but there was no significant statistic difference in Grade II patients of PFOA. CONCLUSIONS: Distal femoral torsion correlates with the severity of patellofemoral arthritis. Variation of the femoral transepicondylar axis caused by the change of ratio of the femoral condyle is particularly important in the distal femoral torsion. In patients with severe PFOA, abnormal variation of the femoral condyle axis should be not ignored.

Determination of Standard Values for Knee Version in a Healthy Population.

BACKGROUND: Different measures are used to describe relevant anatomic variations that can result in patellofemoral instability and disorders. Knee version, the relative rotational alignment between the femur and tibia in the axial plane at the level of the knee, may have a decisive effect on the kinematics of the patellofemoral joint. However, data regarding the values of knee version are currently lacking. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine standard values for knee version in a healthy population. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 100 healthy volunteers (50 male and 50 female) without patellofemoral disorders or lower extremity malalignment were included in this study and underwent knee magnetic resonance imaging. The torsion values of the femur and tibia were independently measured using the Waidelich and Strecker method. Knee version, defined as static rotation of the tibia with respect to the femur in full extension, was determined by measuring the angle between the tangent lines to the dorsal femoral condyle (DFC) and the dorsal tibial head (DTH; defined by the posterior point of the proximal tibial plateau). Supplementary measurements were obtained as follows: (1) femoral epicondylar line (FEL), (2) tibial ellipse center line (TECL), (3) tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, and (4) tibial tuberosity-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance. RESULTS: In 200 analyzed legs of 100 volunteers (mean age, 26.5 ± 5.8 years [range, 18 to 40 years]), we identified a mean internal femoral torsion of -23.8°± 9.7° (range, -46.2° to 1.6°), external tibial torsion of 33.2°± 7.4° (range, 16.4° to 50.3°), and external knee version (DFC to DTH) of 1.3°± 3.9° (range, -8.7° to 11.7°). Other measurements were as follows: FEL to TECL, -0.9°± 4.9° (range, -16.8° to 12.1°); FEL to DTH, -3.6°± 4.0° (range, -12.6° to 6.8°); and DFC to TECL, 4.0°± 4.9° (range, -12.7° to 14.7°). The mean TT-TG distance was 13.4 ± 3.7 mm (range, 5.3-23.5 mm), and the mean TT-PCL distance was 11.5 ± 3.5 mm (range, 6.0-20.9 mm). Female participants had significantly greater external knee version than male participants. CONCLUSION: Coronal- and sagittal-plane alignments of the knee have a well-known effect on the biomechanics of this joint. Additional information about the axial plane may result in new decision-making algorithms for managing knee disorders. This study is the first to report standard values of knee version in a healthy population. As a subsequent step building on this work, we advocate for the measurement of knee version in patients with patellofemoral disorders, as this parameter may assist with new treatment guidelines in the future.

Proximal external femoral torsion increases lateral femoral shaft bowing: a study based on 3D CT reconstruction models.

PURPOSE: Femoral bowing influences the genesis and management of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the femoral torsion angle (FTA) and femoral bowing angle (FBA) in a southern Chinese population. It was hypothesized that a greater FTA would lead to a greater lateral FBA. METHODS: A total of 381 lower extremities from 381 osteoarthritic patients (298 women, 83 men; 201 left, 180 right; mean age 66.5 ± 8.9 years) were retrospectively reviewed. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), side, height, femoral length (FL), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and FTA were set as FBA-related factors. The three-dimensional (3D) FBA, the angle between the anatomical axis of the proximal femur and the anatomical axis of the distal femur in the plane they form, and its projection on the coronal (lateral FBA) and sagittal (anterior FBA) planes were measured on 3D computed tomography (CT) models. The correlation of the 3D, lateral and anterior FBAs with each of the FBA-related factors was explored using multiple linear regression analysis. The correlation between the FBA and FTA was explored and verified after using propensity score matching to control for the other FBA-related factors. RESULTS: The mean lateral and anterior FBAs were 5.5°, with 53.5% greater than 5°, and 12.7°, with 70.3% greater than 11°, respectively. 3D FBA was positively correlated with age (Std.Co = 0.113, P < 0.05) and HKA (Std.Co = 0.129, P < 0.05). Lateral FBA was positively correlated with age (Std.Co = 0.118, P < 0.05), female sex (Std.Co = 0.206, P < 0.05), HKA (Std.Co = 0.184, P < 0.05) and FL (Std.Co = 0.220, P < 0.05). Anterior FBA was positively correlated with age (Std.Co = 0.108, P < 0.05) and male sex (Std.Co = 0.108, P < 0.05). When the related factors were balanced between the two groups (NS), FTA did not significantly affect 3D FBA or anterior FBA (NS), while FTA was positively correlated with lateral FBA (Std.Co = 0.165, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: External torsion of the proximal femur increases the lateral FBA by twisting a partial anterior FBA into a lateral FBA, especially in the female population. If a patient is found to have a large lateral FBA preoperatively, one should be alert to the possibility of a concomitant large FTA, as there are implications for femoral orthopedics, TKA and patellofemoral pressure distribution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Excessive femoral torsion is not associated with patellofemoral pain or instability if TKA is functionally aligned and the patella denervated.

PURPOSE: Recent data suggest that individual morphologic factors should be respected to restore preoperative patellofemoral alignment and thus reduce the likelihood of anterior knee pain. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of excessive femoral torsion (FT) on clinical outcome of TKA. METHODS: Patients who underwent TKA and complete preoperative radiographic evaluation including a long-leg radiograph and CT scan were included. 51 patients showed increased FT of > 20° and were matched for age/sex to 51 controls (FT < 20°). Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up. Thirty-eight matched pairs were compared after a 2 year follow-up clinically (Kujala and patellofemoral score for TKA) and radiographically (FT, frontal leg axis, TT-TG, patellar thickness, patellar tilt, and lateral displacement of patella). Functional alignment of TKA was performed (hybrid-technique). All patellae were denervated but no patella was resurfaced. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between clinical scores two years after surgery between patients with normal and excessive FT (n.s.). Kujala score was 64.3 ± 16.7 versus 64.8 ± 14.4 (n.s.), and patellofemoral score for TKA was 74.3 ± 21 versus 78.5 ± 20.7 (n.s.) for increased FT group and control group, respectively. There was no correlation between preoperative FT and clinical scores. Other radiographic parameters were similar between both groups. No correlations between clinical outcomes and preoperative/postoperative frontal leg axis or total leg axis correction were found (n.s.). CONCLUSION: If the leg axis deformity is corrected to a roughly neutral alignment during cemented TKA, including patellar denervation, then excessive FT was not associated with patellofemoral pain or instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative study, level II.

Combined femoral and acetabular version is sex-related and differs between patients with hip dysplasia and acetabular retroversion.

AIMS: Frequency of abnormal femoral and acetabular version (AV) and combinations are unclear in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This study aimed to investigate femoral version (FV), the proportion of increased FV and femoral retroversion, and combined-version (CV, FV+AV) in DDH patients and acetabular-retroversion (AR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective IRB-approved observational study was performed with 78 symptomatic DDH patients (90 hips) and 65 patients with femoroacetabular-impingement (FAI) due to AR (77 hips, diagnosis on AP radiographs). CT/MRI-based measurement of FV (Murphy method) and central AV were compared. Frequency of increased FV(FV > 25°), severely increased FV (FV > 35°) and excessive FV (FV > 45°) and of decreased FV (FV < 10°) and CV (McKibbin-index/COTAV-index) was analysed. RESULTS: Mean FV and CV was significantly (p < 0.001) increased of DDH patients (mean ± SD of 25 ± 11° and 47 ± 18°) compared to AR (16 ± 11° and 28 ± 13°). Mean FV of female DDH patients (27 ± 16°) and AR (19 ± 12°) was significantly (p < 0.001) increased compared to male DDH patients (18 ± 13°) and AR (13 ± 8°). Frequency of increased FV (>25°) was 47% and of severely increased FV (>35°) was 23% for DDH patients. Proportion of femoral retroversion (FV < 10°) was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in patients AR (31%) compared to DDH patients (17%). 18% of DDH patients had AV > 25° combined with FV > 25°. Of patients with AR, 12% had FV < 10° combined with AV < 10°. CONCLUSION: Patients with DDH and AR have remarkable sex-related differences of FV and CV. Frequency of severely increased FV > 35° (23%) is considerable for patients with DDH, but 17% exhibited decreased FV, that could influence management. The different combinations underline the importance of patient-specific evaluation before open hip preservation surgery (periacetabular osteotomy and femoral derotation osteotomy) and hip-arthroscopy.

The functional role of hip muscles during gait in patients with increased femoral anteversion.

BACKGROUND: Femoral anteversion affects the lever arm and moment-generating capacity of the hip abductors, while an increased hip internal rotation during walking was proposed to be a compensatory mechanism to restore the abductive lever arm. Children with isolated increased femoral anteversion, however, do not always present a deficit in the net hip abduction moment during gait, suggesting that a more comprehensive understanding of the effect of morphology and motion on muscle forces and moments is needed to aid clinical decision making. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are muscle contributions to hip joint moments and muscle forces altered in patients with increased femoral anteversion and internally rotated gait pattern compared to a control group of typically developing children? And how would the functional role of the muscle be altered if the patients walked straight? METHODS: This follow-up study compared patients with increased femoral anteversion (n = 42, 12.8 ± 1.9 years, femoral anteversion: 39.6 ± 6.9°) to controls (n = 9, 12.0 ± 3.0 years, femoral anteversion: 18.7 ± 4.1°). Muscle forces and moment contributions were calculated using personalized musculoskeletal models. Additionally, a hypothetical scenario, in which the gait of the controls was modelled with an anteverted femoral morphology, was used to understand what would happen if the patients walked straight. RESULTS: Gluteus medius abductive contribution was lower in patients compared to controls, despite a comparable net abduction moment around the hip. Patients presented lower muscle forces. However, if modelled to walk straight, they would require higher forces as well as a larger co-contraction of both hip internal and external rotators in the transversal plane. SIGNIFICANCE: This study suggests that patients with increased femoral anteversion walking with an internally rotated gait pattern present lower muscle forces, but when modelled to walk straight muscle forces increase. The current results provide important information to better understand this condition and improve treatment recommendations in these patients.

Interobserver reliability of biplanar radiography is unaffected by clinical factors relevant to individuals at risk of pathological lower limb torsion.

BACKGROUND: Assessments of lower limb torsion are ubiquitous in clinical gait analysis practice as pathologic lower limb rotational deformity may contribute to gait abnormalities, anterior knee pain, as well as other debilitating conditions. Understandably, the overall utility of any torsional assessment is dependent on the measurement method's intrinsic accuracy, precision, and robustness to clinical interference factors. Recently, biplanar radiography (BPR) measurements of torsion have been shown to be both accurate and precise, but the robustness of BPR to potential interference factors is unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: How robust are BPR lower limb torsional assessments to six potential interference factors: amount of torsion, skeletal maturity, radiograph quality, prior osteotomy, presence of implants, and observer training background and experience? METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, four observers of diverse backgrounds and experience generated digital 3D reconstructions of 44 lower limbs using BPR images obtained during standard of care visits (age range 7-35 years). From each reconstruction, four lower limb torsional parameters were computed: femoral torsion, femorotibial rotation, tibial torsion, and transmalleolar axis equivalent. The mean absolute deviation (MAD) of each torsional parameter - calculated across the four observers - was used as the measure of reliability and tested against all interference factors. RESULTS: Results demonstrated that the average MAD was 2.1 degrees for femoral torsion, 3.0 degrees for transmalleolar axis equivalent, 3.8 degrees for femorotibial rotation, and 4.7 degrees for tibial torsion. None of the six potential interference factors were found to systematically influence BPR reliability across all four torsional parameters. Of the factors found to statistically influence one or more torsional parameter, none affected MAD values to a clinically meaningful extent. SIGNIFICANCE: In addition to being accurate and precise, BPR appears to be robust to several clinical factors relevant to children and young adults with or at risk for pathological lower limb torsion.