Improved organ sparing using auto-planned Stanford volumetric modulated arc therapy for total body irradiation technique.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate dosimetric differences between auto-planned volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) total body irradiation (TBI) technique and two-dimensional radiotherapy using anterior-posterial/posterio-anterial beams (2D AP/PA) TBI technique. METHODS: Ten pediatric patients treated with VMAT-TBI on Varian c-arm linac were included in this study. VMAT-TBI plans were generated using our in-house developed and publicly shared auto-planning scripts. For each VMAT-TBI plan, a 2D AP/PA plan was created replicating the institution's clinical setup with the patient positioned at extended source to skin distance (SSD) with a compensator to account for differences in patient thickness, 50% transmission daily lung blocks, and electron chest wall boosts prescribed to 50% of the photon prescription. Clinically relevant metrics were analyzed and compared between the VMAT and 2D plans. RESULTS: All VMAT-TBI plans achieved planned target volume (PTV) D90% ≥ 100% of prescription. VMAT-TBI PTV D90% significantly increased (7.1% ± 2.9%, p < .001) compared to the 2D technique, whereas no differences were observed in global Dmax (p < .2) and PTV V110% (p < .4). Compared to the 2D plans, significant decreases in the Dmean to the lungs (-25.6% ± 11.5%, p < .001) and lungs-1 cm (-34.1% ± 10.1%, p < .001) were observed with the VMAT plans. The VMAT technique also enabled decrease of dose to other organs: kidneys Dmean (-32.5% ± 5.0%, p < .001) and lenses Dmax (-5.3% ± 8.1%, p = .03); and in addition, for 2 Gy prescription: testes/ovaries Dmean (-41.5% ± 11.5%, p < .001), brain Dmean (-22.6% ± 5.4%, p = .002), and thyroid Dmean (-18.2% ± 16.0%, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Superior lung sparing with improved target coverage and similar global Dmax were observed with the VMAT plans as compared to 2D plans. In addition, VMAT-TBI plans provided greater dose reductions in gonads, kidneys, brain, thyroid, and lenses.

Implementing failure mode and effect analysis to improve the safety of volumetric modulated arc therapy for total body irradiation.

PURPOSE: Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for total body irradiation (VMAT-TBI) is a novel radiotherapy technique that has been implemented at our institution. The purpose of this work is to investigate possible failure modes (FMs) in the treatment process and to develop a quality control (QC) program for VMAT-TBI following TG-100 guidelines. METHODS: We formed a multidisciplinary team to map out the complete treatment process of VMAT-TBI following the AAPM TG-100 guidelines. This process map gives a visual representation of the VMAT-TBI workflow from the CT simulation, image processing, contouring, treatment planning, to treatment delivery. From the process map, potential FMs were identified. The occurrence (O), detectability (D), and severity of impact (S) of each FM were assigned according to scoring criteria (1-10) by the multidisciplinary team. A risk priority number (RPN) was calculated from average O, S, and D of each FM (RPN = O x S x D). High risk FMs were identified as 20% of the FMs having the highest RPN scores. After the FMEA analysis, fault-tree analysis (FTA) was performed for each major step of the treatment process to determine the effects of potential failures to the treatment outcome. Effective QC methods were identified to prevent the high risk failures and to improve the safety of the VMAT-TBI program. RESULTS: We identified a total of 55 sub-processes and 128 FMs from the VMAT-TBI workflow. The top five high-risk FMs were: (1) Prescription and/or OAR constraints changed during planning and not communicated to the planner, (2) Patient moves or breathes too heavily during the upper body CT scan (3) Patient moves during the lower body CT scan, (4) Treatment planning system not calculating total body DVH metrics correctly for TBI, (5) Improper optimization criteria used or not sufficient optimization, resulting in suboptimal dose coverage, OAR sparing or excessive hotspots during treatment planning. Two FMs have average severity scores ≥8: Incorrect PTV subdivision/isocenter placement and Prescription and/or OAR constraints changed during planning and not communicated to the planner. Quality assurance and QC interventions including staff training, standard operating procedures, and quality checklists were implemented based on the FMEA and FTA. CONCLUSION: FM and effect analysis was performed to identify high-risk FMs of our VMAT-TBI program. FMEA and FTA were effective in identifying potential FMs and determining the best quality management (QM) measures to implement in the VMAT-TBI program.

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Enabled Total Body Irradiation (VMAT-TBI): Six-year Clinical Experience and Treatment Outcomes.

Total body irradiation is an important part of the conditioning regimens frequently used to prepare patients for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Volumetric-modulated arc therapy enabled total body irradiation (VMAT-TBI), an alternative to conventional TBI (cTBI), is a novel radiotherapy treatment technique that has been implemented and investigated in our institution. The purpose of this study is to (1) report our six-year clinical experience in terms of treatment planning strategy and delivery time and (2) evaluate the clinical outcomes and toxicities in our cohort of patients treated with VMAT-TBI. This is a retrospective single center study. Forty-four patients at our institution received VMAT-TBI and chemotherapy conditioning followed by allogeneic SCT between 2014 and 2020. Thirty-two patients (73%) received standard-dose TBI (12-13.2 Gy in 6-8 fractions twice daily), whereas 12 (27%) received low-dose TBI (2-4 Gy in one fraction). Treatment planning, delivery, and treatment outcome data including overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and toxicities were analyzed. The developed VMAT-TBI planning strategy consistently generated plans satisfying our dose constraints, with planning target volume coverage >90%, mean lung dose ∼50% to 75% of prescription dose, and minimal hotspots in critical organs. Most of the treatment deliveries were <100 minutes (range 33-147, mean 72). The median follow-up was 26 months. At the last follow-up, 34 of 44 (77%) of patients were alive, with 1- and 2-year OS of 90% and 79% and RFS of 88% and 71%, respectively. The most common grade 3+ toxicities observed were mucositis (31 patients [71%]) and nephrotoxicity (6 patients [13%]), both of which were deemed multifactorial in cause. Four patients (9%) in standard-dose cohort developed grade 3+ pneumonitis, with 3 cases in the setting of documented respiratory infection and only 1 (2%) deemed likely related to radiation alone. VMAT-TBI provides a safe alternative to cTBI. The dose modulation capability of VMAT-TBI may lead to new treatment strategies, such as simultaneous boost and further critical organ sparing, for better malignant cell eradication, immune suppression, and lower toxicities.

Verification of junction dose between VMAT arcs of total body irradiation using a Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK phantom.

A volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) approach to total body irradiation (TBI) has recently been introduced at our institution. The planning target volume (PTV) is divided into separate sub-volumes, each being treated with 2 arcs with their own isocentre. Pre-treatment quality assurance of beams is performed on a Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK diode array. Measurement of junction regions between VMAT arcs with separate isocentres has previously been performed with point dose ionization chamber measurements, or with films. Translations of the ArcCHECK with respect to a known distance between the adjacent isocentres of two arcs, which are repeated with the ArcCHECK in an inverted position, allows the recording of a junction dose map. A 3%/3 mm global gamma analysis (10% threshold) pass rate for arc junctions were comparable to their component arcs. Dose maps of junction regions between adjacent arcs with different isocentres can be readily measured on a Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK diode array.