Custo-benefício de diferentes impressoras 3D na Ortodontia / Cost-benefit of different 3d printers in orthodontics

Ao escolher uma impressora 3D para modelos odontológicos, a relação custo-benefício deve ser avaliada. Os modelos impressos devem ser acurados, precisos e eficientes quanto ao tempo, assim como financeiramente acessíveis. O objetivo deste estudo é comparar a acurácia, precisão, custo e tempo necessário para a preparação e impressão de modelos usando diferentes tecnologias: duas impressoras DLP (Digital Light Processing) e uma FFF (Fused Filament Fabrication) comparadas ao padrão-ouro (PolyJet). Para realização deste estudo, foram selecionados 10 escaneamentos de 5 pacientes, contendo a arcada superior e inferior. Todos os 10 modelos foram impressos usando a seguinte combinação de tecnologias: (1) DLP Moonray (MR), (2) DLP Anycubic (AC) (3) DLP Moonray com utilização de resina da Anycubic (MRA), (4) filamento UpMini 2 (FFF) e (5) PolyJet Eden 500 da Objet (PJ). Um dos modelos virtuais foi impresso adicionalmente quatro vezes consecutivas em cada impressora, de forma a permitir a avaliação da precisão destas. O arquivo .STL original de cada modelo foi superposto com o escaneamento do seu respectivo modelo impresso, gerando mapas de cores que permitiram o cálculo de RMS (média quadrática) para a comparação de ambos. Além deste método, foram realizadas medidas lineares através de um paquímetro digital em 8 variáveis diferentes: distância inter-caninos (DIC), distância inter-molares (DIM), plano ântero-posterior bilateralmente (PAP-D e PAP-E), plano vertical bilateralmente (PV-D e PV-E) e plano misto bilateralmente (PM-D e PM-E). O teste Shapiro-Wilk mostrou que os dados não eram normalmente distribuídos. O teste de Friedman com o post hoc de Bonferroni foi utilizado para verificar se havia diferenças entre os valores obtidos para as variáveis avaliadas. Uma diferença acima de 0,4 mm foi considerada clinicamente significante para as medidas lineares. Observou-se diferenças clínica e estatisticamente significantes (p < 0,05) para as seguintes comparações: PV-D e PV-E entre MR e MRA (p=0,00), PV-D entre FFF e MR (p=0,01), e PV-E entre FFF e MR (p=0,00). Já para o RMS, ocorreram diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre: AC e MR (p=0,00); AC e MRA (p=0,00); FFF e MR (p=0,01) e PJ e MR (p=0,01). Para as diferenças no RMS, nenhum valor esteve acima do considerado clinicamente significante (0,25 mm). Quando avaliada a precisão dos modelos pelas medidas lineares, observou-se diferença estatisticamente significativa apenas na variável PV-D entre FFF e AC (p=0,00). A mesma diferença foi vista para os valores de RMS em: AC e MR (p=0,02) e AC e MRA (p=0,04). As impressoras produziram resultados de qualidade similares, embora a Moonray com a resina da Anycubic tenha mostrado perda de acurácia e a Anycubic tenha problema de consistência no plano vertical. Dentre elas, a impressão em PolyJet foi considerada o método mais rápido, porém com o custo muito elevado. A impressão em FFF apresenta um custo baixo da impressora e dos insumos, no entanto com o tempo de impressão consideravelmente mais elevado. Em ambas as impressoras DLP houve um equilíbrio, resultando em um bom custo-benefício(AU)

When choosing a 3D printer for dental models, cost-benefit should be evaluated. Printed models should be accurate, precise and time efficient, as well as financially accessible. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy, precision, cost and time required for preparation and printing using different technologies: two DLP (Digital Light Processing) printers, and one FFF (Fused Filament Fabrication) compared to the gold standard (PolyJet). For this study, it was selected 10 intraoral scans of 5 patients. All 10 models were printed as follows: (1) DLP printer Moonray (MR), (2) DLP printer Anycubic (AC) (3) DLP printer Moonray with Anycubic resin (MRA), (4) filament printer UpMini 2 (FFF) and (5) PolyJet printer Objet eden500 (PJ). One of the virtual models was additionally printed four consecutive times on each printer to allow consistency assessment. The original .STL file of each model was superimposed by scanning its respective printed model, generating color maps that allowed the RMS (root mean square) calculation for the comparison of both models. In addition, linear measurements were performed using a digital caliper on 8 different variables: inter-canine distance (ICD), inter-molar distance (IMD), bilateral anteroposterior plane (APP-R and APP-L), bilateral vertical plane (VP-R and VP-L) and bilateral mixed plan (MP-R and MP-L). The Shapiro-Wilk test showed that the data was not normally distributed. Friedman's test with Bonferroni's post hoc test was used to verify if there were differences between the evaluated variables. A difference above 0.4 mm was considered clinically significant for linear measurements. Clinically and statistically significant differences (p <0.05) were observed for the following comparisons: VP-R and VP-L between MR and MRA (p = 0.00), VP-R between FFF and MR (p = 0.01), VP-L between FFF and MR (p = 0.00). For RMS, there were statistically significant differences between: AC and MR (p = 0.00); AC and MRA (p = 0.00); FFF and MR (p = 0.01) and PJ and MR (p = 0.00). For the differences in RMS, no value was above the clinical significancy threshold (0.25mm). When the consistency of the models by the linear measurements was evaluated, a statistically significant difference was observed only in the VP-R variable between FFF and AC (p = 0.00). The same difference was seen for the RMS values in: AC and MR (p = 0.02) and AC and MRA (p = 0.04). The printers produced similar quality results, although Moonray with Anycubic resin showed loss of accuracy and Anycubic has a consistency problem in vertical plane. Among them, PolyJet printing was considered the fastest one, but with the highest cost. FFF printing has a low printer and filament cost, but with considerably longer printing times. In both DLP printers there was a balance, resulting in a good cost-benefit(AU)

Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner.

BACKGROUND: Accurate laser scanning of plaster casts using validated, low-cost hardware represents a key issue in 3D orthodontics. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of measurements taken from plaster casts (gold standard) with digital models of those casts created with a low-cost structural light DAVID laser scanner. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five different measurements were taken on each of 14 plaster casts by 2 independent observers with an electronic caliper. The measurements were repeated 10 times on all 14 plaster casts by each observer, with a 1-week interval between each set of measurements. All 14 plaster casts were digitized using a low-cost DAVID SLS 3 laser scanner. The same 5 measurements were performed on each of the 3D virtual surface models of the 14 plaster casts by 2 independent observers using Meshlab software in a manner similar to that used with the digital caliper. The measurements were repeated 10 times by the 2 observers with 1 week between each set of measurements. RESULTS: The laser-scanned models were more accurate than the plaster cast models in defining measurements based on simple tooth fissures. The accuracy of measurements based on complex tooth fissures were equivalent for the 2 types of model. For measurements based on interproximal dental contacts, the 2 methods of measurement were similar and both were notably poor in terms of accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional virtual models obtained from the low-cost DAVID laser scanner can be used clinically, but only for certain types of measurements and indications.

Effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed models.

INTRODUCTION: Many variables can affect the accuracy of 3D-printed orthodontic models, and the effects of different printing parameters on the clinical utility of the printed models are just beginning to be understood. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of print layer height on the assessment of 3D-printed orthodontic models with the use of the American Board of Orthodontics Cast-Radiograph Evaluation grading system. METHODS: Twelve cases were scanned using a desktop model scanner and 3D-printed using a stereolithography-based printer at three different layer heights (25, 50, and 100-µm; n = 12 per group). All models were scored by eleven graders using the Cast-Radiograph Evaluation grading system. All models were scored a second time, at least two weeks later. RESULTS: No statistically significant effects of print layer height were found on the scoring of the models for any of the grading metrics or total score. 3D-printed models of each layer height were highly positively correlated with stone models for the total score, with the strongest correlation found with models printed at 100-µm. CONCLUSIONS: 100-µm layer height 3D-printed models are potentially clinically acceptable for the purposes of evaluation of treatment outcomes, diagnosis and treatment planning, and residency training.

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression.

Digital workflows have actively been used to produce dental restorations or oral appliances since dentists started to make digital impressions by acquiring 3D images with an intraoral scanner. Because of the nature of scanning the oral cavity in the patient's mouth, the intraoral scanner is a handheld device with a small optical window, stitching together small data to complete the entire image. During the complete-arch impression procedure, a deformation of the impression body can occur and affect the fit of the restoration or appliance. In order to measure these distortions, a master specimen was designed and produced with a metal 3D printer. Designed reference geometries allow setting independent coordinate systems for each impression and measure x, y, and z displacements of the cylinder top circle center where the distortion of the impression can be evaluated. In order to evaluate the reliability of this method, the coordinate values of the cylinder are calculated and compared between the original computer-aided design (CAD) data and the reference data acquired with the industrial scanner. The coordinate differences between the two groups were mostly less than 50 µm, but the deviations were high due to the tolerance of 3D printing in the z coordinates of the obliquely designed cylinder on the molar. However, since the printed model sets a new standard, it does not affect the results of the test evaluation. The reproducibility of the reference scanner is 11.0 ± 1.8 µm. This test method can be used to identify and improve upon the intrinsic problems of an intraoral scanner or to establish a scanning strategy by measuring the degree of distortion at each part of the complete-arch digital impression.

Reliability of light microscopy and a computer-assisted replica measurement technique for evaluating the fit of dental copings.

The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the reliability of two measurement systems for evaluating the marginal and internal fit of dental copings. Sixteen CAD/CAM titanium copings were produced for a prepared maxillary canine. To modify the CAD surface model using different parameters (data density; enlargement in different directions), varying fit was created. Five light-body silicone replicas representing the gap between the canine and the coping were made for each coping and for each measurement method: (1) light microscopy measurements (LMMs); and (2) computer-assisted measurements (CASMs) using an optical digitizing system. Two investigators independently measured the marginal and internal fit using both methods. The inter-rater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)] and agreement [Bland-Altman (bias) analyses]: mean of the differences (bias) between two measurements [the closer to zero the mean (bias) is, the higher the agreement between the two measurements] were calculated for several measurement points (marginal-distal, marginal-buccal, axial-buccal, incisal). For the LMM technique, one investigator repeated the measurements to determine repeatability (intra-rater reliability and agreement). For inter-rater reliability, the ICC was 0.848-0.998 for LMMs and 0.945-0.999 for CASMs, depending on the measurement point. Bland-Altman bias was -15.7 to 3.5 µm for LMMs and -3.0 to 1.9 µm for CASMs. For LMMs, the marginal-distal and marginal-buccal measurement points showed the lowest ICC (0.848/0.978) and the highest bias (-15.7 µm/-7.6 µm). With the intra-rater reliability and agreement (repeatability) for LMMs, the ICC was 0.970-0.998 and bias was -1.3 to 2.3 µm. LMMs showed lower interrater reliability and agreement at the marginal measurement points than CASMs, which indicates a more subjective influence with LMMs at these measurement points. The values, however, were still clinically acceptable. LMMs showed very high intra-rater reliability and agreement for all measurement points, indicating high repeatability.

Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we assessed the precision and trueness of dental models printed with 3-dimensional (3D) printers via different printing techniques. METHODS: Digital reference models were printed 5 times using stereolithography apparatus (SLA), digital light processing (DLP), fused filament fabrication (FFF), and the PolyJet technique. The 3D printed models were scanned and evaluated for tooth, arch, and occlusion measurements. Precision and trueness were analyzed with root mean squares (RMS) for the differences in each measurement. Differences in measurement variables among the 3D printing techniques were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Except in trueness of occlusion measurements, there were significant differences in all measurements among the 4 techniques (P <0.001). For overall tooth measurements, the DLP (76 ± 14 µm) and PolyJet (68 ± 9 µm) techniques exhibited significantly different mean RMS values of precision than the SLA (88 ± 14 µm) and FFF (99 ± 14 µm) techniques (P <0.05). For overall arch measurements, the SLA (176 ± 73 µm) had significantly different RMS values than the DLP (74 ± 34 µm), FFF (89 ± 34 µm), and PolyJet (69 ± 18 µm) techniques (P <0.05). For overall occlusion measurements, the FFF (170 ± 55 µm) exhibited significantly different RMS values than the SLA (94 ± 33 µm), DLP (120 ± 28 µm), and PolyJet (96 ± 33 µm) techniques (P <0.05). There were significant differences in mean RMS values of trueness of overall tooth measurements among all 4 techniques: SLA (107 ± 11 µm), DLP (143 ± 8 µm), FFF (188 ± 14 µm), and PolyJet (78 ± 9 µm) (P <0.05). For overall arch measurements, the SLA (141 ± 35 µm) and PolyJet (86 ± 17 µm) techniques exhibited significantly different mean RMS values of trueness than DLP (469 ± 49 µm) and FFF (409 ± 36 µm) (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 3D printing techniques showed significant differences in precision of all measurements and in trueness of tooth and arch measurements. The PolyJet and DLP techniques were more precise than the FFF and SLA techniques, with the PolyJet technique having the highest accuracy.

Reliability of light microscopy and a computer-assisted replica measurement technique for evaluating the fit of dental copings

Abstract The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the reliability of two measurement systems for evaluating the marginal and internal fit of dental copings. Material and Methods: Sixteen CAD/CAM titanium copings were produced for a prepared maxillary canine. To modify the CAD surface model using different parameters (data density; enlargement in different directions), varying fit was created. Five light-body silicone replicas representing the gap between the canine and the coping were made for each coping and for each measurement method: (1) light microscopy measurements (LMMs); and (2) computer-assisted measurements (CASMs) using an optical digitizing system. Two investigators independently measured the marginal and internal fit using both methods. The inter-rater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)] and agreement [Bland-Altman (bias) analyses]: mean of the differences (bias) between two measurements [the closer to zero the mean (bias) is, the higher the agreement between the two measurements] were calculated for several measurement points (marginal-distal, marginal-buccal, axial-buccal, incisal). For the LMM technique, one investigator repeated the measurements to determine repeatability (intra-rater reliability and agreement). Results: For inter-rater reliability, the ICC was 0.848-0.998 for LMMs and 0.945-0.999 for CASMs, depending on the measurement point. Bland-Altman bias was −15.7 to 3.5 μm for LMMs and −3.0 to 1.9 μm for CASMs. For LMMs, the marginal-distal and marginal-buccal measurement points showed the lowest ICC (0.848/0.978) and the highest bias (-15.7 μm/-7.6 μm). With the intra-rater reliability and agreement (repeatability) for LMMs, the ICC was 0.970-0.998 and bias was −1.3 to 2.3 μm. Conclusion: LMMs showed lower interrater reliability and agreement at the marginal measurement points than CASMs, which indicates a more subjective influence with LMMs at these measurement points. The values, however, were still clinically acceptable. LMMs showed very high intra-rater reliability and agreement for all measurement points, indicating high repeatability.

Avaliação da concordância entre modelos ortodônticos digitais e de gesso com e sem apinhamento / Evaluation of the agreement between digital and orthodontic models with and without crowding

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o grau de concordância entre modelos ortodônticos digitais e modelos ortodônticos de gesso com e sem apinhamento. A amostra foi composta por 116 modelos de gesso, sendo 50% com apinhamento e os outros 50% sem apinhamento. Todos eles foram escaneados através do aparelho Optical 3D (Open Technologies, Itália) gerando modelos digitais. Foram realizadas medidas do diâmetro mesiodistal (DMD) dos dentes e da soma de segmentos dos arcos dentários. Nos modelos físicos as medições foram feitas com paquímetro digital, já nos digitais foram feitas a partir do programa MeshLab, versão 1.3.4 BETA. A concordância entre os modelos ortodônticos digitais e de gesso foi avaliada pelo método de Bland-Altman e a hipótese de o viés ser ou não igual a zero foi verificada pelo teste t de Student para amostras emparelhadas. Foi adotado o nível de significância estatística de 5% e nível de significância clínica ≥ 0,5mm para DMD e ≥ 1,5mm para soma de segmento de arco. Apesar de existirem algumas diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre as medições realizadas nos modelos de gesso e os digitais com e sem apinhamento, as discrepâncias foram consideradas clinicamente não significantes para ambos. Conclui-se que as medições obtidas a partir de modelos digitais com ou sem apinhamento, gerados através do aparelho Optical 3D scanner (Open Technologies, Itália) e programa MeshLab®, são concordantes com as realizadas manualmente em modelos de gesso. Modelos 9 digitais podem ser uma alternativa clinicamente confiável para modelos de gesso na prática ortodôntica.(AU)

The objective of this study was to evaluate the degree of agreement between digital orthodontic models and orthodontic models of plaster with and without crowding. The sample consisted of 116 gypsum models, 50% with crowding and the other 50% with no crowding. All of them were scanned through the Optical 3D device (Open Technologies, Italy) generating digital models. Measurements were made of the mesiodistal diameter of the teeth and the sum of segments of the dental arches. In the physical models the measurements were made with digital caliper, already in the digital ones were made from the program MeshLab, version 1.3.4 BETA. The agreement between the digital orthodontic and plaster models was evaluated by the Bland-Altman method and the hypothesis that the bias was equal to zero was verified by Student's t test for paired samples. The level of statistical significance was set at 5% and clinical significance level ≥ 0.5mm for DMD and ≥ 1.5mm for sum of arc segment. Although there were some statistically significant differences between the measurements performed in the plaster models and the digital ones with and without crowding, the discrepancies were considered clinically not significant for both. It is concluded that the measurements obtained from digital models with or without crowding, generated by the Optical 3D scanner (Open Technologies, Italy) and 11 MeshLab® program, are in agreement with those performed manually in plaster models. Digital models may be a clinically reliable alternative for plaster models in orthodontic practice.(AU)

Accuracy and mechanical properties of orthodontic models printed 3-dimensionally from calcium sulfate before and after various postprinting treatments.

INTRODUCTION: Dental models fabricated with 3-dimensional printing technologies are revolutionizing the practice of orthodontics, but they generally comprise polymeric materials that may not be suitable for certain applications, such as soldering appliances. The objective of this study was to investigate the dimensional accuracy and mechanical properties of 3-dimensional printed ceramic-based models before and after various treatments intended to improve their mechanical properties. METHODS: Thirty identical models were printed 3-dimensionally from a calcium sulfate-based substrate and divided into 3 groups for treatment: high heat (250°C for 30 minutes), low heat (150°C for 30 minutes), and Epsom salt treatment. Each model was scanned before and after treatment with a laser scanner, and dimensional stability was analyzed by digital superimpositions using a best-fit algorithm. The models were weighed before and after treatment to evaluate mass changes. Additionally, 3-dimensional printed cylinders treated as described above and an untreated control group were subjected to compressive mechanical testing (n = 11 per group). RESULTS: The Epsom salt treatment group had statistically significant increases in both peak compressive stress and modulus of elasticity when compared with the other treatment groups. All treatment groups had statistically significant changes in mass, with the Epsom salt group gaining mass and the 2 heat-treatment groups losing mass. The low-temperature treatment group had a statistically significantly lower mean average for dimensional deviations (0.026 ± 0.010 mm) than did the other treatment groups (0.069 ± 0.006 and 0.059 ± 0.010 mm for high temperature and Epsom salt, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Dental models printed 3-dimensionally with calcium sulfate and treated with Epsom salt showed significant improvement in compressive mechanical properties and retained clinically acceptable dimensional stability.

A Proposed Methodology to Assess the Accuracy of 3D Scanners and Casts and Monitor Tooth Wear Progression in Patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to detail and assess the capability of a novel methodology to 3D-quantify tooth wear progression in a patient over a period of 12 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A calibrated stainless steel model was used to identify the accuracy of the scanning system by assessing the accuracy and precision of the contact scanner and the dimensional accuracy and stability of casts fabricated from three different types of impression materials. Thereafter, the overall accuracy of the 3D scanning system (scanner and casts) was ascertained. Clinically, polyether impressions were made of the patient's dentition at the initial examination and at the 12-month review, then poured in type IV dental stone to assess the tooth wear. The anterior teeth on the resultant casts were scanned, and images were analyzed using 3D matching software to detect dimensional variations between the patient's impressions. RESULTS: The accuracy of the 3D scanning system was established to be 33 µm. 3D clinical analysis demonstrated localized wear on the incisal and palatal surfaces of the patient's maxillary central incisors. The identified wear extended to a depth of 500 µm with a distribution of 4% to 7% of affected tooth surfaces. CONCLUSION: The newly developed 3D scanning methodology was found to be capable of assessing and accounting for the various factors affecting tooth wear scanning. Initial clinical evaluation of the methodology demonstrates successful monitoring of tooth wear progression. However, further clinical assessment is needed.

Comparison of the linear dimensional accuracy of the maxillary denture teeth by three flask closure methods. An in vitro study.

PURPOSE: This laboratory study conducted to evaluate and compare the influence of different flask closure methods on linear dimensional changes of standardized simulated maxillary complete dentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty casts were made from a silicone mold representing an edentulous maxillary arch. Thirty identical maxillary dentures were made and randomly assigned to 3 test groups (A, B, C). In Group A, flasks were placed directly in pressure clamp after trial closure. Group B: The final closure was done in a hydraulic press then transferred to pressure clamp. Group C: After trial closure flask was positioned between the two iron plates of the Restriction System flask closure (RSFC) method. Then linear distances were measured three times before and after polymerization: right incisor to left incisor (RI-LI), right premolar to left premolar (RPM-LPM), right molar to left molar (RM-LM) and left incisor- to- left molar (LI-LM) and right incisor- to- right molar (RI-RM) with the help of digital caliper with an accuracy of 0.01mm. ANOVA and Tuckey's test were used to compare the groups (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Inter molar (LM-RM) width showed the greatest dimensional change after processing and Linear dimensions were not significantly influenced by the packing procedure. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, Restriction System flask closure (RSFC) method demonstrated a similar performance in reducing the tooth movement when compared with other flask closure methods. The posterior region of the denture may present changes in the tooth position after processing, which need to be clinically adjusted.

Measurement of the accuracy of dental working casts using a coordinate measuring machine.

Background/Aim: Dental impressions present a negative imprint of intraoral tissues of a patient which is, by pouring in gypsum, transferred extraorally on the working cast. Casting an accurate and precise working cast presents the first and very important step, since each of the following stages contributes to the overall error of the production process, which can lead to inadequately fitting dental restorations. The aim of this study was to promote and test a new model and technique for in vitro evaluation of the dental impression accuracy, as well as to asses the dimensional stability of impression material depending on the material bulk, and its effect on the accuracy of working casts. Methods: Impressions were made by the monophasic technique using the experimental master model. Custom trays with spacing of 1, 2 and 3 mm were constructed by rapid prototyping. The overall of 10 impressions were made with each custom tray. Working casts were made with gypsum type IV. Measurement of working casts was done 24 h later using a co-ordinate measuring machine. Results: The obtained results show that the working casts of all the three custom trays were in most cases significantly different in the transversal and sagittal planes in relation to the master model. The height of abutments was mainly unaffected. The degree of convergence showed certain significance in all the three custom trays, most pronounced in the tray with 3 mm spacing. Conclusion: The impression material bulk of 1­3 mm could provide accurate working casts when using the monophasic impression technique. The increase of the distance between abutment teeth influences the accuracy of working casts depending on the material bulk. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. TR 35020: Research and development of modelling methods and approaches in manufacturing of dental recoveries with the application of modern technologies and computer aided systems]

Avaliação do planejamento em modelos para próteses parciais removíveis recebidos por laboratórios de Teresina, Piauí / Assessment of Removable Partial Denture Planning in Dental Cast Models received from Prosthodontic Laboratories of the City of Teresina, Piauí, Brazil

Introdução: a Prótese Parcial Removível (PPR) é por vezes negligenciada por profissionais quanto a sua confecção clínica e laboratorial e transferência de responsabilidades do cirurgião-dentista ao técnico de prótese dentária. Objetivo: este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a qualidade de planejamentos e preparos em modelos de trabalho enviados, por acadêmicos e Cirurgiões-Dentistas, à laboratórios de prótese dentária para confecção de PPRs. Método: a pesquisa foi realizada em 8 laboratórios de prótese dentária cadastrados no Conselho Regional de Odontologia do Piauí (CRO-PI), onde foram aplicados formulários com 10 questões fechadas. A amostra foi composta por 60 modelos para confecção de PPR, 30 encaminhados por dentistas e 30 por estudantes. Resultados: os resultados de mostraram que 21 (35%) dentistas utilizaram o gesso pedra para vazar os moldes e 21 (35%) estudantes, o gesso especial; 27 (45%) acadêmicos realizaram os preparos nos modelos, e 24 (40%) dentistas não prepararam os modelos; 2 (3,3%) técnicos receberam desenhos de dentistas e 26 (43,3%) estudantes enviaram os desenhos; 20 (33,3%) modelos de estudantes chegaram delineados e 29 (48,3%) modelos de dentistas foram delineados pelos técnicos; 26 (43,3%) técnicos não tiveram dúvidas nos planejamentos enviados por estudantes e 15 (25%) técnicos tiveram dúvidas nos trabalhos encaminhados por dentistas e 100% comunicou-se para esclarecimentos. Conclusão: concluiu-se que uma parcela considerável de Cirurgiões-Dentistas negligenciam as etapas de preparos de boca e planejamento das PPRs, delegando ao técnico em prótese dentária a maior responsabilidade no planejamento e execução das próteses.

Introduction: the Removable Partial Denture (RPD) is often neglected by professionals regarding their clinical and laboratory preparation and the transference of the responsibility from the dentist to the dental technician. Objective: this study aimed to assess the quality of planning and preparation in removable partial denture casts performed by dental students and dentists sent to the dental laboratories. Methods: the survey was conducted in eight registered dental laboratories in the Regional Council of Dentistry of Piaui (CRO-PI), where the forms was applied, with 10 closed questions. The sample consisted of 60 models for making RPD, 30 referred by dentists and 30 students. Results: the results showed that 21 (35%) dentists used plaster stone for casting and 21 (35%) students were leaked with special plaster; 27 (45%) of the dental students performed preparation in the dental models, and 24 (40%) dentists not prepared models; 2 (3.3%) of the dental technicians received technical designs of dentists and 26 (43.3%) of students; 20 (33.3%) students models arrived designed and 29 (48.3%) of dentists were done by technicians; 26 (43.3%) technicians had no doubt on the planning submitted by students and 15 (25%) had technical issues on the work referred by dentists and 100% communicated for clarification. Conclusion: in conclusion, a considerable number of dentists neglect the steps of mouth preparations and planning of RPDs, delegating to the dental technician the major responsibility in designing and executing removable partial denture.

Are All Dentiform Teeth with Simulated Caries the Same? A Six-Year Retrospective Study in Preclinical Operative Dentistry.

Dentiform teeth with simulated caries (DTSC), frequently used in preclinical courses, should show no variability in the amount of simulated caries from tooth to tooth. However, the level of caries variability among DTSC is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the variation in simulated caries levels in one group of DTSC and determine whether variation among DTSC impacted the preclinical performance of dental students. In the study, 80 commercially available mandibular first molar DTSC with simulated mesio-occluso-distal caries were sectioned in coronal (n=40) and sagittal (n=40) planes where the caries depth/width was greatest. Section images were analyzed for variation in levels of simulated caries using image-processing software. Three years of practical performance data using DTSC were compared with three years of practical performance data using dentiform teeth without simulated caries, for a total of six years (students' performance on two exams, Practical 1 and Practical 2). The results showed that 70% of the coronally sectioned teeth had manufacturing defects that resulted in caries overextension at the dentino-enamel junctions (DEJs). Overextensions were found at the DEJ in 41.3% of the sagittally sectioned teeth. There was a statistically significant decrease in Practical 1 performance of the students who used DTSC as compared with students who used teeth without simulated caries (p=0.0001); there was no statistically significant difference on Practical 2 performance. Of the DTSC evaluated in this study, 56.6% contained manufacturing defects, and more than 80% were found to have excessive caries variation. Prediction of which DTSC will have caries overextension is not possible. Students preparing DTSC that contain caries overextension are therefore at increased risk of receiving undeserved negative summative assessment on practical examinations.

Effect of Employing Different Typodonts When Using E4D Compare for Dental Student Assessment.

The use of computers to aid in instruction and help decrease the subjective component of assessment is steadily increasing. One of the potential barriers to the effective utilization of CAD/CAM technology for assessment purposes is the efficient scanning of the teeth being used for comparison. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if the use of different typodonts, of the same make and model, has any significant effect on the percent comparison results when using E4D Compare. Tooth #30 was prepared by a faculty member to represent what dental students at Georgia Regents University are taught as the ideal preparation for a full gold crown. Ten typodonts of the same make and model were selected for comparison. Three different examples of students' preparations were scanned and compared to the ideal preparation. Each of the three student preparations was subjected to ten trials (occasions), one for each typodont, at five tolerance levels: 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm, 0.4 mm, and 0.5 mm. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure the intrarater agreement among the typodonts at the various tolerance levels. The agreement coefficients (0.971-0.984) indicated very little variability attributable to the use of a different typodont. The high agreement coefficients achieved using different typodonts of the same make and model provide evidence for the interchangeability of typodonts when assessing a student's performance in the preclinical simulation environment.

[Reproducibility and repeatability of the determination of occlusal plane on digital dental models].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the repeatability(intraobserver comparison)and reproducibility(interobserver comparison)of two different methods for establishing the occlusal plane on digital dental models. METHODS: With Angle's classification as a stratification factor,48 cases were randomly extracted from 806 ones which had integrated clinical data and had their orthodontic treatment from July 2004 to August 2008 in Department of Orthodontics ,Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology.Post-treatment plaster casts of 48 cases were scanned by Roland LPX-1200 3D laser scanner to generate geometry data as research subjects.In a locally developed software package,one observer repeated 5 times at intervals of at least one week to localize prescriptive landmarks on each digital model to establish a group of functional occlusal planes and a group of anatomic occlusal planes, while 6 observers established two other groups of functional and anatomic occlusal planes independently.Standard deviations of dihedral angles of each group on each model were calculated and compared between the related groups.The models with the five largest standard deviations of each group were studied to explore possible factors that might influence the identification of the landmarks on the digital models. RESULTS: Significant difference of intraobserver variability was not detected between the functional occlusal plane and the anatomic occlusal plane (P>0.1), while that of interobserver variability was detected (P<0.001). The pooled experimental standard deviation the 6 observers established for the functional occlusal plane was 0.2° smaller than that of the anatomic occlusal plane.The functional occlusal plane's variability of intraobserver and interobsever did not differ significantly (P>0.1), while the anatomic occlusal plane's variability of the intraobserver was significantly smaller than that of the interobserver (P<0.001), with a 0.12° difference value of the pooled experimental standard deviation. CONCLUSION: When one observer measures a number of digital models,both the functional and the anatomic occlusal planes are suitable as a conference plane with equal repeatability. When several observers measure a large number of digital models,the functional occlusal plane is more reproducible than the anatomic occlusal plane ,but the difference is small.

Influence of standardization on the precision (reproducibility) of dental cast analysis with virtual 3-dimensional models.

INTRODUCTION: Virtual 3-dimensional (3D) models obtained by scanning of physical casts have become an alternative to conventional dental cast analysis in orthodontic treatment. If the precision (reproducibility) of virtual 3D model analysis can be further improved, digital orthodontics could be even more widely accepted. The purpose of this study was to clarify the influence of "standardization" of the target points for dental cast analysis using virtual 3D models. Physical plaster models were also measured to obtain additional information. METHODS: Five sets of dental casts were used. The dental casts were scanned with R700 (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and REXCAN DS2 3D (Solutionix, Seoul, Korea) scanners. In this study, 3 system and software packages were used: SureSmile (OraMetrix, Richardson, Tex), Rapidform (Inus, Seoul, Korea), and I-DEAS (SDRC, Milford, Conn). RESULTS: Without standardization, the maximum differences were observed between the SureSmile software and the Rapidform software (0.39 mm ± 0.07). With standardization, the maximum differences were observed between the SureSmile software and measurements with a digital caliper (0.099 mm ± 0.01), and this difference was significantly greater (P <0.05) than the 2 other mean difference values. Furthermore, the results of this study showed that the mean differences "WITH" standardization were significantly lower than those "WITHOUT" standardization for all systems, software packages, or methods. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that elimination of the influence of usability or habituation is important for improving the reproducibility of dental cast analysis.

Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.

INTRODUCTION: Chairside oral scanners allow direct digital acquisition of the intraoral situation and can eliminate the need for conventional impressions. In this study, we aimed to assess accuracy, scan time, and patient acceptance of a chairside oral scanner when used for full-arch scans; these are critical factors for acceptance of this technology in the orthodontic setting. METHODS: Fifteen patients had digital models made from both intraoral scans (Lava COS; 3M ESPE, St Paul, Minn) and alginate impressions. Each procedure was timed, and patient preference was assessed with a survey. In addition, digital models were made from 5 plaster model pairs using the intraoral scanner and an orthodontic model scanner. Model pairs were digitally superimposed, and differences between models were quantified. Accuracy was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. Time differences were tested for statistical significance with the Student t test. RESULTS: Digital models made using the chairside oral scanner and either impressions or the orthodontic model scanner did not differ significantly. The chair time required to take impressions was significantly shorter than the time required for the intraoral scans. When processing time was included, the time requirement did not differ significantly between methods. Although 73.3% of the patients preferred impressions because they were "easier" or "faster," 26.7% preferred the scan because it was "more comfortable." CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high accuracy of chairside oral scanners, alginate impressions are still the preferred model acquisition method with respect to chair time and patient acceptance. As digital technology continues to progress, intraoral scanning may become more accepted for use in orthodontics.

Reliability assessment and correlation analysis of evaluating orthodontic treatment outcome in Chinese patients.

This study aimed to assess the reliability of experienced Chinese orthodontists in evaluating treatment outcome and to determine the correlations between three diagnostic information sources. Sixty-nine experienced Chinese orthodontic specialists each evaluated the outcome of orthodontic treatment of 108 Chinese patients. Three different information sources: study casts (SC), lateral cephalometric X-ray images (LX) and facial photographs (PH) were generated at the end of treatment for 108 patients selected randomly from six orthodontic treatment centers throughout China. Six different assessments of treatment outcome were made by each orthodontist using data from the three information sources separately and in combination. Each assessment included both ranking and grading for each patient. The rankings of each of the 69 judges for the 108 patients were correlated with the rankings of each of the other judges yielding 13 873 Spearman rs values, ranging from -0.08 to +0.85. Of these, 90% were greater than 0.4, showing moderate-to-high consistency among the 69 orthodontists. In the combined evaluations, study casts were the most significant predictive component (R(2)=0.86, P<0.000 1), while the inclusion of lateral cephalometric films and facial photographs also contributed to a more comprehensive assessment (R(2)=0.96, P<0.000 1). Grading scores for SC+LX and SC+PH were highly significantly correlated with those for SC+LX+PH (r(SC+LX)vs.(SC+LX+PH)=0.96, r(SC+PH)vs.(SC+LX+PH)=0.97), showing that either SC+LX or SC+PH is an excellent substitute for all three combined assessment.