A cost-utility analysis of 18F-fluorocholine-positron emission tomography imaging for localizing primary hyperparathyroidism in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperparathyroidism historically necessitated bilateral neck exploration to remove abnormal parathyroid tissue. Improved localization allows for focused parathyroidectomy with lower complication risks. Recently, positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine demonstrated high accuracy in detecting these lesions, but its cost-effectiveness has not been studied in the United States. METHODS: A decision tree modeled patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism using single preoperative localization modalities: (1) positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine, (2) 4-dimensional computed tomography, (3) ultrasound, and (4) sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). All patients underwent either focused parathyroidectomy versus bilateral neck exploration, with associated cost ($) and clinical outcomes measured in quality-adjusted life-years gained. Model parameters were informed by literature review and Medicare costs. Incremental cost-utility ratios were calculated in US dollars/quality-adjusted life-years gained, with a willingness-to-pay threshold set at $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year. One-way, 2-way, and threshold sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine gained the most quality-adjusted life-years (23.9) and was the costliest ($2,096), with a total treatment cost of $11,245 or $470/quality-adjusted life-year gained. Sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography and ultrasound were dominated strategies. Compared with 4-dimentional computed tomography, the incremental cost-utility ratio for positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine was $91,066/quality-adjusted life-year gained in our base case analysis, which was below the willingness-to-pay threshold. In 1-way sensitivity analysis, the incremental cost-utility ratio was sensitive to test accuracy, positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine price, postoperative complication probabilities, proportion of bilateral neck exploration patients needing overnight hospitalization, and life expectancy. CONCLUSION: Our model elucidates scenarios in which positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine can potentially be a cost-effective imaging option for primary hyperparathyroidism in the United States. Further investigation is needed to determine the maximal cost-effectiveness for positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine in selected populations.

Diagnostic workup and costs of a single supplemental molecular breast imaging screen of mammographically dense breasts.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine additional diagnostic workup and costs generated by addition of a single molecular breast imaging (MBI) examination to screening mammography for women with dense breasts. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Women with mammographically dense breasts presenting for screening mammography underwent adjunct MBI performed with 300 MBq (99m)Tc-sestamibi and a direct-conversion cadmium-zinc-telluride dual-head gamma camera. All subsequent imaging tests and biopsies were tracked for a minimum of 1 year. The positive predictive value of biopsies performed (PPV3), benign biopsy rate, cost per patient screened, and cost per cancer detected were determined. RESULTS: A total of 1651 women enrolled in the study. Among the 1585 participants with complete reference standard, screening mammography alone prompted diagnostic workup of 175 (11.0%) patients and biopsy of 20 (1.3%) and yielded five malignancies (PPV3, 25%). Results of combined screening mammography plus MBI prompted diagnostic workup of 279 patients (17.6%) and biopsy of 67 (4.2%) and yielded 19 malignancies (PPV3, 28.4%). The benign biopsy rates were 0.9% (15 of 1585) for screening mammography alone and 3.0% (48 of 1585) for the combination (p < 0.001). The addition of MBI increased the cost per patient screened from $176 for mammography alone to $571 for the combination. However, cost per cancer detected was lower for the combination ($47,597) than for mammography alone ($55,851). CONCLUSION: The addition of MBI to screening mammography of women with dense breasts increased the overall costs and benign biopsy rate but also increased the cancer detection rate, which resulted in a lower cost per cancer detected than with screening mammography alone.

Breast-specific gamma imaging is a cost effective and efficacious imaging modality when compared with MRI.

BACKGROUND: Both MRI and breast-specific gamma imaging are tools for surgical planning in newly diagnosed breast cancer. Breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) is used less frequently although it is of similar utility and lower cost. We compared the diagnostic and cost efficacy of BSGI with MRI. METHODS: Retrospective review of 1,480 BSGIs was performed in a community breast health center, 539 had a new diagnosis of cancer, 75 patients having both MRI and BSGI performed within 2 months of each other. Institutional charges for BSGI ($850) and MRI ($3,381) were noted. RESULTS: BSGI had a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 73%, positive predictive value of 78%, and negative predictive value of 90%. This compared favorably with MRI that had sensitivity of 89%, specificity 54%, positive predictive value 67%, and negative predictive value 83%. The accuracy of BSGI was higher at 82% vs MRI at 72%. Total cost of MRI imaging was $253,575 vs BSGI at $63,750. CONCLUSIONS: BSGI is a cost-effective and accurate imaging study for further evaluation of dense breast tissue and new diagnosis of cancer.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting suspected recurrence or metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients with negative diagnostic total body scan in Thailand: a decision analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cost-effectiveness analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT to detect tumor recurrence or metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer patients with high Tg but negative TBS in Thailand. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective literature review of 55 studies published between 1978 and 2010 was done. Decision analysis by TreeAge program showed an evaluation of the most cost-effective treatment and 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in thyroid cancer patients with high Tg but negative TBS. The incremental cost and life years gained associated with seven strategies approached were analyzed by the decision tree model. The first strategy was treatment with empirical high dose 131I therapy. The second to the seventh strategies were using imaging investigations by CT scan of neck and chest, 99mTc MIBI scan, and 18F-FDG PET/CT scan to identify recurrent, persistent, and metastatic lesions before the specific treatment via curative surgery, external radiotherapy, and high dose 131I therapy. All strategies were adopted using hospital perspective and direct medical cost was estimated based on the reference price of Siriraj Hospital. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate the effect of the cost of PET/CT scan. RESULTS: The strategy using 18F-FDG PET/CT scan to detect recurrence or metastasis and possible curative surgery in operable cases and high dose 131I therapy in inoperable cases gave the highest life years gained of 27.08 with cost of 90,227.61 Baht (2,926.24 US dollars) and acceptable incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 6,936.88 Baht (224.98 US dollars) per life year gained when compared to the least costly strategy using 99mTc MIBI scan and additional 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in negative MIBI result. Other strategies were dominated by this PET/CT strategy. Deterministic sensitivity analysis (based on the willingness to pay (WTP) 360,000 Baht (11,675.42 US dollars) showed that the cost of PET/CT scan has no impact on the net health benefit. CONCLUSION: Based on the hospital perspective, the cost-effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in detecting suspected recurrence or metastasis in thyroid carcinoma patients with negative diagnostic TBS but high Tg was first done using 18F-FDG PET/CT scan to identify disease, followed by curative surgery or high dose 131I therapy. Moreover cost of PET/CT scan did not influence the net health benefit. This PET/CT benefit is helpfulfor considering the proper PET/CT use for thyroid cancer in Thailand.

Comparison of radiation exposure and cost between dynamic computed tomography and sestamibi scintigraphy for preoperative localization of parathyroid lesions.

IMPORTANCE: Dynamic computed tomography (CT) is emerging as a first-line alternative to sestamibi scintigraphy for preoperative localization of parathyroid lesions. In recent years, there has been increased concern over the impact of radiation exposure from medical imaging, as well as on the cost of diagnostic medical procedures. An ideal diagnostic procedure would be cost effective while minimizing hazardous exposures and complication rates. OBJECTIVE: To compare the radiation dose and financial cost of dynamic CT with sestamibi scintigraphy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A retrospective review of 263 patients at a large, urban, tertiary referral center who underwent either dynamic parathyroid CT or sestamibi scintigraphy for any etiology of hyperparathyroidism from 2006 through 2010. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The 2 primary study outcomes were radiation exposure measured in millisieverts (mSv) and medical charges for the respective diagnostic procedures. The study was conducted with the hypothesis that dynamic parathyroid CT would have slightly greater radiation exposure with similar cost to sestamibi scintigraphy. RESULTS: Dynamic parathyroid CT and sestamibi scintigraphy delivered mean radiation doses of 5.56 and 3.33 mSv, respectively (P < .05). Charges totaled $1296 for thin-cut dynamic parathyroid CT and a mean of $1112 for sestamibi scintigraphy, depending on the type and amount of radiotracer injected. Although multiphase CT scanning took less than 5 minutes, sestamibi scintigraphy lasted a mean time of 306 minutes. A total of 62 of 119 patients (52%) in the CT group have undergone operative treatment to date, whereas all patients in the sestamibi arm underwent operative treatment of their hyperparathyroidism. Of the patients who underwent a surgical procedure, CT correctly identified the side of the parathyroid adenoma in 54 of 62 patients (87%), while sestamibi scintigraphy only correctly lateralized 90 of 122 adenomas (74%) as confirmed by exploratory surgery, intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels, and pathologic features. A dynamic parathyroid CT correctly predicted multiglandular disease in 1 of 7 patients (14%), while sestamibi scintigraphy correctly predicted multiglandular disease in 8 of 23 patients (35%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients who underwent directed parathyroid surgery, dynamic CT is comparable to sestamibi scintigraphy in patients with hyperparathyroidism. Although CT delivers a higher dose of radiation, the average background radiation exposure in the United States is 3 mSv/y, and added exposures of less than 15 mSv are considered low risk for carcinogenesis. Overall, dynamic parathyroid CT is a safe, cost-effective alternative to sestamibi scintigraphy.

Would scan, but which scan? A cost-utility analysis to optimize preoperative imaging for primary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism depends on accurate preoperative localization. This study examines the cost-utility of sestamibi in combination with single photon emission computed tomography (sestamibi-SPECT); ultrasound; and 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT). METHODS: A decision tree was constructed for patients undergoing initial parathyroidectomy. Patients were randomized to 1 of 5 preoperative localization protocols: (1) ultrasound; (2) sestamibi-SPECT; (3) 4D-CT; (4) sestamibi-SPECT and ultrasound; and (5) sestamibi-SPECT and ultrasound and 4D-CT, if discordant (sestamibi-SPECT and ultrasound ± 4D-CT). From a societal perspective, all relevant costs were included. Input data were obtained from literature and Medicare. The incremental cost-utility ratio was determined in dollars per quality-adjusted life years ($/QALY). Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the base-case, ultrasound was least expensive, with a cost of $6666, compared to $6773 (4-D CT); $7214 (sestamibi-SPECT and ultrasound ± 4D-CT); $7330 (sestamibi-SPECT); and $7371(sestamibi-SPECT and ultrasound). Sestamibi-SPECT and ultrasound ± 4D-CT were most cost-effective because improved localization resulted in fewer bilateral explorations. QALY were comparable across modalities. Compared to sestamibi-SPECT, ultrasound, 4D- CT, and sestamibi-SPECT and ultrasound ± 4D-CT resulted a win-win situation-costing less and accruing more utility. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the model was sensitive to surgery cost and diagnostic accuracy of imaging. CONCLUSION: In our model, sestamibi-SPECT and ultrasound ± 4D-CT were the most cost-effective methods, followed by 4D-CT and ultrasound. Sestamibi-SPECT alone was least cost-effective. Cost-utilities were dependent on the sensitivities of ultrasound and 4D-CT and may vary by institution.

Cost-effectiveness of 99mTc-sestamibi in predicting response to chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

UNLABELLED: Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a major problem in lung cancer. (99m)Tc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile ((99m)Tc-MIBI) has been demonstrated to be a noninvasive marker for the diagnosis of MDR-related P glycoprotein and MDR-associated protein expression in various solid tumors. Studies have shown that (99m)Tc-MIBI could play a significant role in the management of lung cancer; for example, it could be used in the selection of patients for chemotherapy or radiotherapy or in combined protocols before the start of treatment. Accurate selection of chemosensitive patients with (99m)Tc-MIBI would result not only in effective treatment of patients but also in significant cost savings for health care providers. There is increasing pressure on health care providers to consider costs in medical decision making, particularly in the last decade, as several economic evaluations have appeared in the medical literature. The aims of this study were to undertake a systematic review of the performance of (99m)Tc-MIBI imaging in the assessment of treatment resistance in lung cancer and to use the findings of the review in a decision tree analysis of the potential cost-effectiveness of (99m)Tc-MIBI imaging in selecting lung cancer patients for chemotherapy. METHODS: This study included a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis together with a cost-effectiveness analysis of studies with a decision tree analysis model. RESULTS: Analysis of the studies revealed that the overall sensitivity of (99m)Tc-MIBI in identifying responders to chemotherapy was 94%, the specificity was 90%, and the accuracy was 92%. The sensitivity analysis revealed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of greater than pound30,000 ( approximately $42,900) for the strategy of treating all patients to recover the small loss of life expectancy (7.5 d) associated with the use of (99m)Tc-MIBI to preselect patients for chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: (99m)Tc-MIBI SPECT can accurately predict which patients with lung cancer will respond to chemotherapy. The use of (99m)Tc-MIBI to preselect patients for chemotherapy has the potential to yield significant cost savings in the health care system without a significant loss of life expectancy for patients.

The cost-effectiveness of sestamibi scanning compared to bilateral neck exploration for the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism.

This article presents a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine whether preoperative imaging with Tc99m-sestamibi for detection and treatment of solitary adenomas associated with primary hyperparathyroidism is cost-effective compared with routine bilateral neck exploration.

A review of the cost-effectiveness of Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography in diagnosis of breast cancer in Taiwanese women with indeterminate mammographically dense breast.

In general, biopsy is the preferred management method for women with indeterminate mammographically dense breasts. In this review, we describe a decision analysis model comparing technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile (Tc-99m sestamibi) scintimammography and excisional biopsy as breast cancer evaluation strategies for hypothetical cohorts of estimated 16,000-40,000 women with indeterminate mammographic probability of malignancy because of mammographically dense breasts. In cost-effectiveness analysis, quantitative decision tree sensitivity analysis was used to compare the conventional excision biopsy alone strategy (strategy A) with decision strategy for screening with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography before excision biopsy (strategy B) after an indeterminate mammogram. Strategy B showed a cost saving of US dollars 649,600-1,624,000 in reducing the cost of unnecessary biopsies. The total cost of strategy B showed a cost saving of US dollars 123,075-307,776 compared to strategy A. The analysis data indicate that Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography can save the cost of unnecessary biopsies in Taiwanese women with non-diagnostic mammogram because of mammographically dense breasts.

Modern parathyroid surgery: a cost-benefit analysis of localizing strategies.

HYPOTHESIS: Preoperative and intraoperative localizing techniques are more cost-effective than a nondirected bilateral neck exploration in the initial treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT). DESIGN: A clinical outcome model was developed to simulate the surgical management of primary HPT. Clinical scenarios modeled included a nondirected bilateral neck exploration and surgery using the following localizing strategies: preoperative technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scanning, intraoperative "quick" intact parathyroid hormone assay, or intraoperative radioguidance. Average total charges based on intent to treat were estimated from our practice and from the literature. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Average total charges per patient (for the primary operation and for reexploration for persistent HPT, if needed), incidence of surgical failure (ie, persistent HPT), and risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (cumulative risk of the primary procedure and a subsequent operation for persistent HPT). RESULTS: The use of any localizing strategy reduced total charges, risk of persistent HPT, and cumulative risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury compared with a nondirected bilateral neck exploration. The greatest cost savings and the lowest risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury were achieved when technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scanning was combined with intraoperative radioguidance. The lowest rate of persistent HPT was found when technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scanning was combined with an intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay. CONCLUSIONS: Limited parathyroid surgery using any localizing strategy is cost-effective, safe, and efficacious in the management of primary HPT. The cost benefit was primarily achieved by reduced operative charges and immediate hospital discharge rather than a lower need for reexploration for persistent HPT.

Efficiency comparison between 99m Tc-tetrofosmin and 99m Tc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion studies.

The purpose of this investigation was to compare the efficiency of two different imaging protocols using two different clinically available 99mTc labelled myocardial perfusion tracers. One thousand one hundred and thirty-four imaging studies were performed prospectively, using either 99mTc-tetrofosmin or 99mTc-sestamibi, alternating the use of each tracer for a total period of 8 months. 99mTc-tetrofosmin rest studies were performed with injections of 259MBq-370MBq and imaging 30 min later. Exercise studies were performed with injections of 777MBq-1.11GBq and imaging 20 min later. 99mTc-sestamibi studies used doses similar to those in the 99mTc-tetrofosmin studies. Imaging followed a standard procedure, at 60 min after rest injection, and 30 min after exercise. For patients undergoing pharmacological stress testing99mTc-sestamibi was imaged 45 min after injection and 99mTc-tetrofosmin was imaged 30 min after injection. Variables analysed were (1) injection-to-imaging time for the procedure, and (2) the number of repeated scans because of extra cardiac activity. The completion time for the rest study was significantly shorter for 99mTc-tetrofosmin compared to 99mTc-sestamibi (47.7+/-21.7 min vs 74.3+/-25.8 min P<0.0001). Likewise, the total study time was shorter for 99mTc-tetrofosmin compared to 99mTc-sestamibi (90+/-32.7 min vs 124+/-37 min, P<0.0001). More importantly, the number of repeated scans was higher with 99mTc-sestamibi compared to 99mTc-tetrofosmin, 21.4% vs 10%, P=0.001 for rest studies and 16.4% vs 7.9% P=0.001 [corrected] for rest and stress. It was concluded that, using a same day rest/stress protocol, 99mTc-tetrofosmin provided higher patient throughput with fewer repeat scans. These factors may be considered for efficiency improvement in nuclear cardiology laboratories using 99mTc perfusion tracers.

Resting echocardiography and quantitative dipyridamole technetium-99m sestamibi tomography in the identification of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and the prediction of long-term prognosis after heart transplantation.

AIMS: To evaluate the accuracy of echocardiography in conjunction with quantitative high-dose dipyridamole technetium-99m sestamibi tomography (SPECT) in detecting coronary allograft vasculopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-eight consecutive heart transplant recipients underwent echocardiography while at rest and high-dose dipyridamole SPECT within 48 h of a yearly angiogram. Resting wall motion abnormalities were considered significant if present in two or more segments. SPECT was considered abnormal in the presence of reversible/fixed defects. The coronary angiogram was normal in 53, showed non-significant coronary allograft vasculopathy in 13 and significant (> or = 50% stenosis) coronary allograft vasculopathy in 12 cases. Resting wall motion abnormalities were observed in nine cases and perfusion defects in 20. Echocardiography and SPECT were concordant in 59 cases (five positive and 54 negative); in these, accuracy was 100% for significant coronary allograft vasculopathy and 83% for any coronary allograft vasculopathy. Over 6.5+/-2 years, 17 patients suffered coronary allograft vasculopathy-related events, including death in six and retransplantation in three. Resting wall motion abnormalities, SPECT perfusion defects and angiographic coronary allograft vasculopathy were significant predictors of cardiac events. CONCLUSION: Normal resting wall motion at echocardiography coupled to normal stress myocardial perfusion, rules out the presence of significant coronary allograft vasculopathy in many heart transplant recipients. Conversely, resting wall motion abnormalities and perfusion defects strongly predict cardiac events. Therefore, a strategy which reserves angiography for patients with resting wall motion abnormalities and/or perfusion defects may be safe and cost-effective.

Impact of technetium-99m sestamibi imaging on the emergency department management and costs in the evaluation of low-risk chest pain.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of rest sestamibi scanning on emergency physicians' (EPs') diagnostic certainty and decision making (as assessed by the hypothetical disposition of patients) for 69 consenting stable patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia and nondiagnostic electrocardiograms. The resultant impact on costs was examined as a secondary outcome. METHODS: Patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia were injected with 25 mCi of sestamibi within two hours of active pain in one of three emergency department study sites. The probability of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and unstable angina (UA), and hypothetical disposition decisions were recorded immediately before and after physicians were notified of scan results. Changes in disposition were classified as optimal or suboptimal. For the cost determinations, a cost-based decision support program was used. RESULTS: For the subgroup found to be free of acute cardiac events (ACEs) (n = 62), the EPs' post-sestamibi scan probabilities for AMI decreased by 11% and UA by 18% (p < 0.001 for both conditions). In seven patients with ACEs, the post-scan probabilities of AMI and UA increased, but neither was statistically significant. Scan results led to hypothetical disposition changes in 29 patients (42%), of which 27 (93%) were optimal (nine patients were reassigned to a lower level of care, two to a higher level, and 16 additional patients to "discharge-home" status). The strategy of scanning all patients who were low to moderate risk for acute cardiac ischemia would result in an increase of direct costs of care of $222 per patient evaluated, due to added cost of sestamibi scanning. CONCLUSIONS: Sestamibi scanning results appropriately affected the EPs' estimates of the probability of AMI and UA and improved disposition decisions. Scanning all low-risk patients would likely be associated with increased costs at this medical center.

Decision analysis for the cost effectiveness of sestamibi scintimammography in minimizing unnecessary biopsies.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess if breast cancer screening using sestamibi scintimammography (SSMM) in conjunction with mammography (MM) is cost effective in avoiding biopsies in healthy patients. METHODS: Quantitative decision tree sensitivity analysis was used to compare the conventional MM alone strategy (strategy A) with two decision strategies for screening with SSMM; SSMM after an indeterminate mammogram (strategy B) or SSMM after both a positive and an indeterminate mammogram (strategy C). Cost effectiveness was measured by calculating the expected cost per patient and the average life expectancy per patient for baseline values as well as over a range of values for all of the variables of each strategy. RESULTS: Based on Medicare reimbursement values, strategies B and C showed a cost savings of $9 and $20 per patient respectively as compared to strategy A. This translates into respective savings of $189 and $420 million per year assuming 21 million females undergo screening each year. Strategies B and C did however have a loss of mean life expectancy of 0.000178 and 0.000222 years respectively as compared to strategy A due to interval progression of breast cancer in a small number of women. Strategies B and C significantly lowered the number of biopsies performed on healthy patients in the screening population by 750,063 and 1,557,915 biopsies respectively as compared to strategy A. CONCLUSIONS: These results quantitatively verify the potential utility of using SSMM in avoiding unnecessary biopsies.

Is sestamibi-guided parathyroidectomy really cost-effective?

BACKGROUND: Sestamibi-guided limited neck explorations are an alternative to the standard bilateral neck exploration for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. A recently published meta-analysis by Denham and Norman (JACS vol.186, 1998) suggested that a sestamibi-directed approach offers a cost benefit because it decreases operative and recovery room times, hospital stay, and the number of frozen sections needed. METHODS: We reviewed 41 bilateral neck explorations for primary hyperparathyroidism and compared our results with those reported by the meta-analysis to determine whether a sestamibi-directed approach is cost effective. RESULTS: Operative and recovery room times averaged 60.3 +/- 19.3 and 45 minutes, respectively. Forty six percent of the patients were treated as outpatients, and 1.21 +/- 0.57 frozen sections were obtained per case. Our standard bilateral exploration cost 47% less than the bilateral approach and 17% less than the sestamibi-directed operation calculated in the meta-analysis. There were no cases of nerve injury or permanent hypocalcemia, 98% of patients were cured, and 61% of patients did not require narcotics postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Sestamibi-guided parathyroidectomy may not offer any advantage over the standard bilateral exploration. In our experience, a bilateral neck exploration can be performed on an outpatient basis and at low cost, with a high success rate and minimal morbidity. Most patients do not require narcotics, and the cosmetic results are excellent.

Cost-effectiveness of preoperative sestamibi scan for primary hyperparathyroidism is dependent solely upon the surgeon's choice of operative procedure.

BACKGROUND: In 1991, a National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel stated that preoperative localization for primary hyperparathyroidism is not cost effective. Since then, the sestamibi scan has been applied to parathyroid disease with excellent results, even allowing unilateral exploration under local anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: A metaanalysis of the English literature over the past 10 years was performed to determine the collective sensitivity and specificity of sestamibi scanning to establish its utility in directing a unilateral procedure. The cost effectiveness of scanning all patients with sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism was examined by determining the costs of seven operative technique-dependent variables that could be reduced with a limited procedure. RESULTS: The average sensitivity and specificity of sestamibi were 90.7% and 98.8%, respectively, indicating its ability to guide an accurate unilateral exploration. The analysis of 6,331 patients showed that 87% had solitary adenomas. An average cost savings of $650 was demonstrated for a unilateral operation, which could be realized in as many as 90% (sestamibi sensitivity) of those with solitary adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative sestamibi scan is specific enough in identifying solitary adenomas to allow unilateral exploration with a < 1% failure rate. The sensitivity of this scan suggests that 78% of all patients with sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism (90% of the 87% with solitary adenomas) are candidates for unilateral exploration. This rate is significantly higher than the 51% rate at which scanning all patients becomes cost effective.