Evaluation of the position of the needle tip during thoracentesis: Experimental study.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracentesis is performed to both diagnose and/or treat pleural effusion, and several important complications of thoracentesis are occasionally observed. To assess precise thoracentesis procedures, we evaluated the position of the needle tip during thoracentesis by using a thoracentesis unit, comparing experienced and inexperienced groups. METHODS: Twenty eight physicians (19 board-certified pulmonologists as an experienced group and the remaining 9 as an inexperienced group) participated at Fukujuji Hospital in January 2021. All participants performed 2 punctures with a handmade thoracentesis unit and measured the needle's angle to the midline. RESULTS: The median distance from the needle tip to the midline when the needle was inserted 5 cm (D5) was 0.47 cm (range 0.06-1.05), and the median difference between D5 on the 1st puncture (D51st) and D5 on the 2nd puncture (D52nd) was 0.22 cm (range 0.00-0.69). D5 was shorter in the experienced group than in the inexperienced group (median 0.40 cm (range 0.06-0.66) vs 0.58 cm (range 0.44-1.05), P < .001). There were no significant differences in the D51st and D52nd distances between the experienced and inexperienced groups (median 0.22 cm (range 0.00-0.40) vs 0.41 cm (range 0.04-0.69), P = .094). When 4 areas were divided by the x-axis and y-axis, 32 punctures (55.2%) deviated to the right-upper quadrant, and 25 (86.2%) of participants made the 1st puncture and 2nd puncture in the same direction. CONCLUSIONS: All doctors should know that the needle direction might shift by approximately 1 cm, and more than half of the practitioners punctured towards the upper right.

Safety model for chest drainage in pandemic by COVID-19.

Over one million cases of the SARS-CoV-2 virus have been confirmed worldwide, with the death toll exceeding 50,000 people. An important issue to be addressed concerns the exposure of health professionals to this new virus. The first reports from Wuhan province, China, described infection rates of up to 29% among healthcare professionals before the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) was fully regulated. There are several protocols on the correct use of PPE during aerosol-generating procedures. However, there is no specific guidance on how to proceed in cases of need for chest tubes in patients with positive COVID-19 active air leak. The objective of this work is to assist surgeons of the most diverse specialties during the chest drainage of a patient with COVID-19 and to avoid a risk of contamination to the professional and the environment.

Physician Practice Patterns for Performing Thoracentesis in Patients Taking Anticoagulant Medications.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing thoracentesis often have comorbid conditions or take medications that potentially put them at higher bleeding risk. Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has also increased significantly. There are no published guidelines or consensus on when to perform thoracentesis in patients on anticoagulants. Recent studies support the safety of a more liberal approach for thoracentesis among patients with coagulopathy. METHODS: We conducted a survey to ascertain the practices of physicians regarding thoracentesis in patients with increased bleeding risk. The survey was administered to the email distribution lists of the American Association of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology and of the American Thoracic Society. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 256 attending physicians. Most of them were general pulmonologists practicing at academic medical centers. Most of them would perform a thoracentesis in patients receiving acetylsalicylic acid or prophylactic doses of unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin (96%, 89%, and 88%, respectively). Half of the respondents would perform a thoracentesis in patients on antiplatelet medications (clopidogrel and ticagrelor, 51%; ticlopidine, 53%). A minority would perform thoracentesis in patients on direct oral anticoagulants or infused thrombin inhibitors (19% and 12%, respectively). The only subgroup that had a higher proclivity for performing thoracentesis without holding medications were attending physicians practicing for under 10 years. Relative to noninterventional pulmonologists, there were no significant differences in the responses of interventional pulmonologists. CONCLUSION: There was variation in the practice patterns of attending physicians in performing thoracentesis in patients with elevated bleeding risk. Further data and guidelines regarding the safety of thoracentesis in these patients are needed.

Safety model for chest drainage in pandemic by COVID-19 / Modelo de segurança para realização de drenagem torácica na pandemia pela COVID-19

ABSTRACT Over one million cases of the SARS-CoV-2 virus have been confirmed worldwide, with the death toll exceeding 50,000 people. An important issue to be addressed concerns the exposure of health professionals to this new virus. The first reports from Wuhan province, China, described infection rates of up to 29% among healthcare professionals before the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) was fully regulated. There are several protocols on the correct use of PPE during aerosol-generating procedures. However, there is no specific guidance on how to proceed in cases of need for chest tubes in patients with positive COVID-19 active air leak. The objective of this work is to assist surgeons of the most diverse specialties during the chest drainage of a patient with COVID-19 and to avoid a risk of contamination to the professional and the environment.

RESUMO Mais de um milhão de casos do vírus SARS-CoV-2 foram confirmados em todo o mundo, com o número de mortos ultrapassando 50.000 pessoas. Uma questão importante a ser abordada diz respeito à exposição dos profissionais de saúde à esse novo vírus. Os primeiros relatórios da província de Wuhan, na China, descreveram taxas de infecção de até 29% entre os profissionais de saúde antes que o uso de equipamentos de proteção pessoal (EPI) fosse totalmente regulamentado. Existem vários protocolos sobre o uso correto de EPI durante os procedimentos geradores de aerossóis. No entanto, não há orientação específica sobre como proceder em casos de necessidade de drenos torácicos em pacientes com vazamento de ar ativo COVID-19 positivos. O objetivo desse trabalho é auxiliar os cirurgiões das mais diversas especialidades durante a drenagem torácica de um paciente com COVID-19 e evitar um risco de contaminação ao profissional e no ambiente.

Indicadores de calidad en patología pleural: consentimiento informado / Quality indicators in pleural pathology: informed consent

Objetivo. Medir el grado de cumplimiento de dos indicadores de calidad en patología pleural: consentimiento informado en toracocentesis (CIT) y consentimiento informado en biopsia pleural cerrada (CIBPC). Material y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo realizado en 6 hospitales de la Comunidad de Madrid. Se seleccionaron todas las toracocentesis y biopsias pleurales cerradas realizadas por un neumólogo desde el 01/12/2016 al 28/02/2017, en pacientes >16 años con derrame pleural. Variables a estudio: edad, sexo, modelo de consentimiento informado, presencia del CIT y CIBPC en la historia clínica o en archivos parciales e informatización del hospital. Se consideró buen cumplimiento cuando el consentimiento informado estaba presente y correctamente cumplimentado en > 90% de las historias clínicas. Las variables se recogieron en una tabla Excel. Análisis mediante Stata v.12. Resultados. Se realizaron 146 toracocentesis (63 mujeres/83 varones, edad media: 69) y 20 biopsias pleurales cerradas (7 mujeres/13 varones, edad media: 64). De forma global el indicador del CIT se cumple en 125/146 (85,6%) de las historias clínicas revisadas y el CIBPC en 18/20 (90%). Por hospitales 3/6 (50%) cumplen el indicador del CIT y 5/6 (83%) el CIBPC. Están informatizados 5 de los hospitales participantes, sólo uno utiliza la firma electrónica y existen archivos parciales en 2/6. No hay homogeneidad en los consentimientos informados. Conclusiones. El 50% de los hospitales cumple el indicador del CIT y el 83% el CIBPC. Existen diversos modelos de consentimiento informado en la Comunidad de Madrid localizados en la historia clínica, en la digital y en archivos parciales, que se deberían homogeneizar y simplificar

Objective. To measure the degree of compliance of two quality indicators in pleural pathology: informed consent in thoracocentesis (ICT) and informed consent in transthoracic needle biopsy (ICTTNB). Material and methods. Retrospective study carried out in 6 hospitals of the Community of Madrid. All thoracocentesis and transthoracic needle biopsy performed by a pneumologist were selected from 12/01/2016 to 02/28/2017, in patients > 16 years with pleural effusion. Variables to study: age, sex, model of informed consent, presence of ICT and ICTTNB in the clinical history or in partial files and computerization of the hospital. Good compliance was considered when the informed consent was present and correctly completed in > 90% of the clinical history. The variables were collected in an Excel table. Analysis by Stata v.12. Results. 146 thoracocentesis was performed (63 women/83 men, average age: 69) and 20 transthoracic needle biopsy (7 women/13 men, mean age: 64). Overall, the ICT indicator is met in 125/146 (85.6%) of the revised clinical history and the ICTTNB in 18/20 (90%). By hospitals 3/6 (50%) meet the ICT indicator and 5/6 (83%) the ICTTNB. They are computerized 5 of the participating hospitals, only one uses the electronic signature and there are partial files in 2/6. There is no homogeneity in the informed consent. Conclusions. 50% of the hospitals meet the ICT indicator and the 83% ICTTNB one. There are several informed consent's models in the Community of Madrid located in the clinical history, in digital and in partial files, which should be standardized and simplified

Rubrum Coelis: The Contribution of Real-Time Telementoring in Acute Trauma Scenarios-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Most deaths in military trauma occur soon after wounding, and demand immediate on scene interventions. Although hemorrhage predominates as the cause of potentially preventable death, airway obstruction and tension pneumothorax are also frequent. First responders caring for casualties in operational settings often have limited clinical experience.Introduction: We hypothesized that communications technologies allowing for real-time communications with a senior medically experienced provider might assist in the efficacy of first responding to catastrophic trauma.Methods: Thirty-three basic life saving (BLS) medics were randomized into two groups: either receiving telementoring support (TMS, n = 17) or no telementoring support (NTMS, n = 16) during the diagnosis and resuscitation of a simulated critical battlefield casualty. In addition to basic life support, all medics were required to perform a procedure needle thoracentesis (not performed by BLS medics in Israel) for the first time. TMS was performed by physicians through an internet link. Performance was assessed during the simulation and later on review of videos.Results: The TMS group was significantly more successful in diagnosing (82.35% vs. 56.25%, p = 0.003) and treating pneumothorax (52.94% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.035). However, needle thoracentesis time was slightly longer for the TMS group versus the NTMS group (1:24 ± 1:00 vs. 0:49 ± 0:21 minu, respectively (p = 0.016). Complete treatment time was 12:56 ± 2:58 min for the TMS group, versus 9:33 ± 3:17 min for the NTMS group (p = 0.003).Conclusions: Remote telementoring of basic life support performed by military medics significantly improved the medics' ability to perform an unfamiliar lifesaving procedure at the cost of prolonging time needed to provide care. Future studies must refine the indications and contraindications for using telemedical support.

Credentialing of Hospitalists in Ultrasound-Guided Bedside Procedures: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Ultrasound guidance is used increasingly to perform the following 6 bedside procedures that are core competencies of hospitalists: abdominal paracentesis, arterial catheter placement, arthrocentesis, central venous catheter placement, lumbar puncture, and thoracentesis. Yet most hospitalists have not been certified to perform these procedures, whether using ultrasound guidance or not, by specialty boards or other institutions extramural to their own hospitals. Instead, hospital privileging committees often ask hospitalist group leaders to make ad hoc intramural certification assessments as part of credentialing. Given variation in training and experience, such assessments are not straightforward "sign offs." We thus convened a panel of experts to conduct a systematic review to provide recommendations for credentialing hospitalist physicians in ultrasound guidance of these 6 bedside procedures. Pathways for initial and ongoing credentialing are proposed. A guiding principle of both is that certification assessments for basic competence are best made through direct observation of performance on actual patients.

Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Thoracentesis: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Executive Summary: 1) We recommend that ultrasound should be used to guide thoracentesis to reduce the risk of complications, the most common being pneumothorax. 2) We recommend that ultrasound guidance should be used to increase the success rate of thoracentesis. 3) We recommend that ultrasound-guided thoracentesis should be performed or closely supervised by experienced operators. 4) We suggest that ultrasound guidance be used to reduce the risk of complications from thoracentesis in mechanically ventilated patients. 5) We recommend that ultrasound should be used to identify the chest wall, pleura, diaphragm, lung, and subdiaphragmatic organs throughout the respiratory cycle before selecting a needle insertion site. 6) We recommend that ultrasound should be used to detect the presence or absence of an effusion and approximate the volume of pleural fluid to guide clinical decision-making. 7) We recommend that ultrasound should be used to detect complex sonographic features, such as septations, to guide clinical decision-making regarding the timing and method of pleural drainage. 8) We suggest that ultrasound be used to measure the depth from the skin surface to the parietal pleura to help select an appropriate length needle and determine the maximum needle insertion depth. 9) We suggest that ultrasound be used to evaluate normal lung sliding pre- and postprocedure to rule out pneumothorax. 10) We suggest avoiding delay or interval change in patient position from the time of marking the needle insertion site to performing the thoracentesis. 11) We recommend against performing routine postprocedure chest radiographs in patients who have undergone thoracentesis successfully with ultrasound guidance and are asymptomatic with normal lung sliding postprocedure. 12) We recommend that novices who use ultrasound guidance for thoracentesis should receive focused training in lung and pleural ultrasonography and hands-on practice in procedural technique. 13) We suggest that novices undergo simulation-based training prior to performing ultrasound-guided thoracentesis on patients. 14) Learning curves for novices to become competent in lung ultrasound and ultrasound-guided thoracentesis are not completely understood, and we recommend that training should be tailored to the skill acquisition of the learner and the resources of the institution.

Factors Associated with Inpatient Thoracentesis Procedure Quality at University Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Physicians increasingly refer thoracentesis procedures to interventional radiology (IR) rather than performing them at the bedside. Factors associated with thoracentesis procedures at university hospitals were studied to determine clinical outcomes by provider specialty. METHODS: An administrative database review was performed of patients who underwent an inpatient thoracentesis procedure in hospitals participating in the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Database from January 2010 through September 2013. The incidence of iatrogenic pneumothorax, mean total hospital costs, and mean length of stay (LOS) were compared by clinical specialty. RESULTS: There were 113,860 admissions with 132,472 thoracentesis procedures performed on 99,509 patients at 234 UHC hospitals. IR performed 43,783 (33%) thoracentesis procedures; medicine, 22,243 (17%); and pulmonary, 26,887 (20%). The incidence of iatrogenic pneumothorax was 2.8% for IR, 2.9% for medicine, and 3.1% for pulmonary. Medicine and pulmonary had equivalent risk of iatrogenic pneumothorax compared to IR after controlling for clinical covariates. Admissions with medicine and pulmonary procedures were associated with significantly lower costs compared to IR admissions (p < 0.001) after controlling for clinical covariates. Admissions with IR procedures had a mean LOS of 14.1 days; medicine, 13.2 days; and pulmonary, 15.9 days. Admissions with medicine and pulmonary procedures were associated with fewer hospital days when compared to IR in the controlled model (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Admissions with medicine and pulmonary bedside thoracentesis procedures are as safe and less costly than IR procedures. Shifting IR thoracentesis procedures to the bedside might be a potential way to reduce hospital costs while still ensuring high-quality patient care, provided that portable ultrasound is used.

Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Cost-Utility Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is associated with a significant impact on health-related quality of life. Palliative interventions abound, with varying costs and degrees of invasiveness. We examined the relative cost-utility of 5 therapeutic alternatives for MPE among adults. METHODS: Original studies investigating the management of MPE were extensively researched, and the most robust and current data particularly those from the TIME2 trial were chosen to estimate event probabilities. Medicare data were used for cost estimation. Utility estimates were adapted from 2 original studies and kept consistent with prior estimations. The decision tree model was based on clinical guidelines and authors' consensus opinion. Primary outcome of interest was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for each intervention over a less effective alternative over an analytical horizon of 6 months. Given the paucity of data on rapid pleurodesis protocol, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to address the uncertainty surrounding its efficacy in terms of achieving long-term pleurodesis. RESULTS: Except for repeated thoracentesis (RT; least effective), all interventions had similar effectiveness. Tunneled pleural catheter was the most cost-effective option with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $45,747 per QALY gained over RT, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. Multivariate sensitivity analysis showed that rapid pleurodesis protocol remained cost-ineffective even with an estimated probability of lasting pleurodesis up to 85%. CONCLUSIONS: Tunneled pleural catheter is the most cost-effective therapeutic alternative to RT. This, together with its relative convenience (requiring neither hospitalization nor thoracoscopic procedural skills), makes it an intervention of choice for MPE.