Intra-arterial PSMA injection using hepatic arterial infusion pump in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a proof-of-concept study.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted tracers show increased uptake in several malignancies, indicating a potential for peptide radioligand therapy. Intra-arterial injection of radiotracers can increase the therapeutic window. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of intra-arterial injection of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and compare tracer uptake after intrahepatic arterial injection and intravenous injection. Three patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma received [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 through a hepatic arterial infusion pump, followed by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Two-three days later, patients underwent PET/CT after intravenous [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 injection. All tumours showed higher uptake on the intra-arterial scan compared with the intravenous scan: the intra-arterial / intravenous standardised uptake value normalised by lean body mass ratios were 1.40, 1.46, and 1.54. Local intra-arterial PSMA injection is possible in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Local injection increases tumour-to-normal tissue ratios, increasing the therapeutic window for theranostic applications. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Intra-arterial Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) injection increases the therapeutic window for potential theranostic application in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. KEY POINTS: Three patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma underwent PET/CT after intra-arterial and intravenous injection of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. Intra-arterial injection showed higher uptake than intravenous injection. PSMA-targeted imaging could be valuable for a subset of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared to TACE monotherapy for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until September 1, 2023. Our analysis included 7 cohort studies encompassing a total of 630 patients. The results demonstrated that the TACE plus HAIC group exhibited significantly improved prognosis compared to the TACE alone group, as evidenced by superior rates of complete response, partial response, progressive disease, objective response rate, and disease control rate. Moreover, the TACE group displayed a lower risk of platelet reduction and vomiting when compared to the TACE plus HAIC group. None of the 7 studies reported any intervention-related mortality. In conclusion, the combination of TACE and HAIC may be recommended as a viable option for patients with unresectable HCC, given its evident enhancements in survival and tumor response rates without significant differences in adverse events when compared to TACE monotherapy. Nevertheless, additional randomized controlled trials and studies involving Western cohorts are warranted to further validate these findings.

Hepatic arterial infusion of GEMOX plus systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor in large unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) plus systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy (GEM-SYS) in combination with lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor for patients with large unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC). METHODS: From November 2019 to December 2022, 21 large uICC patients who underwent GEMOX-HAIC (Day 1) and GEM-SYS (Day 8) (3w/cycle) combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor were retrospectively enrolled. Local tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Tumor response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. AEs were evaluated by the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0. RESULTS: After a median follow-up duration of 16.0 months (range 5-43.5 months), 17 patients had died. The median OS was 19.5 months (range 9-43.5 months), and the median PFS was 6.0 months (range 2.5-38.5 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 71.4 %, 42.9 %, and 19.0 %, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 33.3 %, 19.0 %, and 9.5 %, respectively. Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were observed in 0 (0 %), 11 (52.3 %), 5 (23.8 %), and 5 (23.8 %) patients, respectively. The disease control rate and objective response rate were 76.1 % and 52.3 %, respectively. None of the enrolled patients experienced grade 5 AEs. CONCLUSIONS: GEMOX-HAIC plus GEM-SYS in combination with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor was effective and well tolerated for patients with large uICC.

Digital subtraction angiography-guided pancreatic arterial infusion of GEMOX chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing with intravenous chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma lacks effective treatment options, and systemic gemcitabine-based chemotherapy offers only marginal survival benefits at the cost of significant toxicities and adverse events. New therapeutic options with better drug availability are warranted. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-guided pancreatic arterial infusion (PAI) versus intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) using the gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study prospectively enrolled 51 eligible treatment-naive patients with unresectable PC to receive GEMOX treatment via PAI or IVC (1:1 ratio randomization) from December 2015 to December 2019. Cycles were repeated monthly, and each process consisted of two treatments administered bi-weekly. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 1-year survival, 6-month survival, tumor-site subgroup survival, and incidences of adverse events were compared. RESULTS: The median OS of the PAI and IVC groups were 9.93 months and 10.07 months, respectively (p = 0.3049). The median PFS of the PAI and IVC groups were 5.07 months and 4.23 months (p = 0.1088). No significant differences were found in the ORR (11.54% vs. 4%, p = 0.6312), DCR (53.85% vs. 44%, p = 0.482), and 1-year OS rate (44% vs. 20.92%, p = 0.27) in PAI and IVC groups. The 6-month OS rate was significantly higher in the PAI group (100%) than in the IVC group (83.67%) (p = 0.0173). The median OS of patients in PAI group with pancreatic head and neck tumors were significantly higher than those of body and tail tumors (12.867 months vs. 9 months, p = 0.0214). The incidences of hematologic disorders, liver function disorders, and digestive disorders in the IVC group were higher than in the PAI group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: GEMOX PAI therapy presented a higher 6-month OS rate and fewer adverse events than IVC in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Those with pancreatic head and neck tumors may yield a superior treatment outcome from PAI treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02635971. DATE OF REGISTRATION: 21/12/2015.

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS:  In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared to TACE monotherapy for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:  Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until September 1, 2023. Our analysis included 7 cohort studies encompassing a total of 630 patients. RESULTS:  The results demonstrated that the TACE plus HAIC group exhibited significantly improved prognosis compared to the TACE alone group, as evidenced by superior rates of complete response, partial response, progressive disease, objective response rate, and disease control rate. Moreover, the TACE group displayed a lower risk of platelet reduction and vomiting when compared to the TACE plus HAIC group. None of the 7 studies reported any intervention-related mortality. CONCLUSION:  In conclusion, the combination of TACE and HAIC may be recommended as a viable option for patients with unresectable HCC, given its evident enhancements in survival and tumor response rates without significant differences in adverse events when compared to TACE monotherapy. Nevertheless, additional randomized controlled trials and studies involving Western cohorts are warranted to further validate these findings.

The Use of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy for Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in men and women (Siegel et al. in CA Cancer J Clin 72(1):7-33). Over one-half of newly diagnosed individuals will develop liver metastases. Among those with liver-only metastatic disease, only about one in five will be candidates for potentially curable resection.

[Preliminary clinical use of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: The clinical data of 12 patients with unresectable ICC who received HAIC combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab in the First Affliated Hospital of Soochow University from October 2021 to April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. HAIC included gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin; this regimen was combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab within 3-7 days after its initial administration. Relevant laboratory examinations were performed before each cycle of HAIC, and enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed every 6-9 weeks. Tumor response to treatment was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and treatment-related adverse reactions of patients with ICC were statistically analyzed. Results: The objective response rate to HAIC combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab was 6/12; the disease control rate was 8/12; the median progression-free survival was 11.8 months; and the median overall survival was 14.2 months. Three patients had grade Ⅳ adverse reactions (increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase thrombocytopenia), while three patients had grade Ⅲ adverse reactions (increased total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase). The remaining patients had grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ adverse reactions. There were no serious complications related to interventional surgery. Conclusions: Use of HAIC (gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin) combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab in the treatment of unresectable ICC may be safe and feasible. Preliminary clinical studies have shown that this combination can improve the survival and prognosis of patients with ICC.

A Multidisciplinary Therapeutic Approach Proposal for Huge Hepatocellular Carcinomas Exceeding 10 cm in Diameter.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The outcome of hepatectomy for a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exceeding 10 cm (i.e., huge HCC) remains unfavorable. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the optimal therapeutic approach for huge HCCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2018, patients with a huge HCC who underwent treatment at our institution were enrolled. Cases not meeting the criteria (Child-Pugh grade A or performance status 0/1) and patients with distant metastases were excluded. Patients were stratified into three groups: a) upfront hepatectomy (Upfront); b) hepatectomy subsequent to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC-Hr); and c) HAIC alone (HAIC). Survival rates, including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were analyzed. The cancer-specific mortality attributed to recurrence within one year after surgery was defined as "futile surgery"; the rate of futile surgery was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 70 cases were censored (Upfront/HAIC-Hr/HAIC: 28/13/29). The 5-year PFS and OS rates for Upfront, HAIC-Hr, and HAIC were 7.7%, 69.2%, and 6.9%, and 37.1%, 79.1%, and 19.7%, respectively. The number of futile surgeries was 6 (21.4%) in the Upfront group, whereas no such cases occurred in the HAIC-Hr group. CONCLUSION: Although hepatectomy was advocated in the Upfront group due to the potential resectability, the outcomes were comparable to those of the HAIC group. Conversely, the HAIC-Hr group had promising outcomes, marked by a decreased prevalence of futile surgeries. Huge HCCs should be regarded as borderline resectable, even when deemed potentially resectable. Therefore, a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach might be reasonable.

Local-Regional Therapy for Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer.

ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the United States as well as a leading cause of cancer-related death. Upward of 30% of patients ultimately develop metastatic disease, most commonly to the liver and lung. Untreated, patients have poor survival. Historically, patients with oligometastatic disease were treated with resection leading to long-term survival; however, there are many patients who are not surgical candidates. Innovations in thermal ablation, hepatic artery infusions, chemoembolization and radioembolization, and stereotactic ablative radiation have led to an expansion of patients eligible for local therapy. This review examines the evidence behind each modality for the most common locations of oligometastatic colorectal cancer.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hepatic Arterial Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: A Comparative Analysis of HAIC-FO and Sorafenib.

BACKGROUND The FOHAIC-1 trial showed hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (HAIC-FO) improved survival, compared with sorafenib, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness comparison between HAIC-FO and sorafenib from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. MATERIAL AND METHODS The economic evaluation was conducted between July 2023 and February 2024, spanning a 10-year investment horizon. A Markov model was developed to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of HAIC-FO vs sorafenib. Health states incorporated in the model comprised progression-free disease, progressed disease, and death. Transition probabilities were derived from data obtained from the FOHAIC-1 trial. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to evaluate cost-effectiveness. Additionally, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed the model's robustness. RESULTS The HAIC-FO group accrued a total cost of $22,781, whereas the sorafenib group totaled $18,795. In terms of effectiveness, the HAIC-FO group achieved 1.06 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), whereas the sorafenib group attained 0.65 QALYs. Compared with sorafenib, HAIC-FO yielded an additional 0.41 QALYs at a cost of additional $3,985, resulting in an incremental cost of $9,720 per QALY gained. The one-way sensitivity analysis revealed the final ICER remained below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $30,492 per QALY, when considering parameter fluctuations. Additionally, probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 99.8% probability that the ICER for HAIC-FO compared with sorafenib would fall below the WTP threshold. CONCLUSIONS Compared with sorafenib, HAIC-FO emerged as a cost-effective first-line treatment option for patients facing advanced HCC in China.

The ARH score, a practical guide to decision-making for retreatment with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic arterial infusionchemotherapy (HAIC) is a promising option for large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Identifying patients who could benefit from continuous HAIC remains a challenge. We aimed to establish an objective model to guide the decision for retreatment with HAIC. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2020, the data of patients with large unresectable HCC without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread undergoing multiple HAIC cycles from 3 different centers were retrieved. We investigated the basic tumor parameters and the effect of HAIC on liver function and tumor response, and their impact on overall survival (OS). A point score (ARH, Assessment for Retreatment with HAIC) was built by using a stepwise Cox regression model in the training cohort (n = 112) and was validated in an independent validation cohort (n = 71). RESULTS: The high α-fetoprotein before the second cycle of HAIC, an increase in Child-Pugh score, and undesirable radiologic tumor responses remained independent negative prognostic factors and were used to create the ARH score. The prognosis of HCC patients deteriorated significantly with the increase in ARH score. The median OS of patients with ARH score 0-2 points and ≥ 2.5 points were 19.37 months and 11.60 months (P < 0.001). All of these results had been confirmed in the external validation cohort and demonstrated significance across multiple subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The ARH score makes an excellent prediction of the prognosis of HCC patients who received retreatment of HAIC. Patients with an ARH score ≥ 2.5 prior to the second cycle of HAIC may not profit from further sessions.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Aims/Background The combination of lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor has demonstrated significant efficacy in treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Our study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of triple therapy that includes hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Patients with a primary diagnosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma between June 2020 and August 2023 were included in this study. Initially, 53 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled. Then, 13 patients were excluded based on the inclusion criteria, resulting in 40 patients included for analysis. Among them, 31 patients received triple therapy, including 16 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer C stage, 12 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-B, and 3 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-A hepatocellular carcinoma patients. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate, while the secondary endpoints included the conversion resection rate, pathological complete response rate, pathological partial response rate, and treatment-related adverse events. Results The objective response rate was 80.65% at a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range: 12.6-55.8 months). Of the 14 patients (45.2%) who underwent conversion therapy and were eligible for surgery, 7 patients underwent liver resection and the remaining 7 patients underwent liver transplantation. The median interval between the start of triple therapy and surgery was 117 days, ranging from 25 to 215 days. The pathological complete response was observed in six patients (19.4%) and the pathological partial response rate in eight patients (25.8%). All adverse events occurred in 77.4% of the patients. Conclusion In patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, the combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitor exhibits favourable efficacy and well tolerability, achieving a desirable pathological complete response rate while maintaining manageable drug toxicity.

Indocyanine green fluorescence perfusion testing in robot-assisted hepatic arterial infusion pump placement.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) treatment is a technique used to treat liver localized malignancy with intra-arterial chemotherapy. Methylene blue is generally administered to verify hepatic perfusion and exclude inadvertent extrahepatic perfusion. The use of indocyanine green dye (ICG) combined with near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging during robot-assisted HAIP placement may be an attractive alternative by providing high contrast without blue discoloration of the operative field. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively from 2 centers in the Netherlands. Intraoperative perfusion of the liver segments and extrahepatic perfusion were assessed using ICG/NIR as well as methylene blue on video imaging and correlated to postoperative 99 m-Tc perfusion scintigraphy. RESULTS: 13 patients underwent robot-assisted surgery for HAIP placement; median length of stay was 4 days, complications occurred in 4 patients. Hepatic perfusion showed identical patterns when ICG was compared with methylene blue. In 1 patient, additional extrahepatic perfusion was found using ICG, leading to further vessel ligation. Intraoperative ICG perfusion was concordant with 99 m-Tc perfusion scintigraphy. DISCUSSION: Liver and extrahepatic perfusion determined by ICG fluorescence imaging is concordant with blue dye perfusion and 99 m-Tc perfusion scintigraphy. Therefore, ICG fluorescence imaging is deemed a safe and reliable technique for perfusion testing during robot-assisted HAIP placement.

Atezolizumab and bevacizumab plus transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for patients with high tumor burden unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Though atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) offer promise for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treatment, the response rate remains suboptimal. Our previous studies highlighted the potential of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) when combined with FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in HCC treatment. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A+B plus TACE-HAIC for high tumor burden uHCC (HTB-uHCC). METHODS: This three-center retrospective study involved 82 HTB-uHCC patients administered with TACE-HAIC followed by A+B. We characterized HTB-uHCC patients as those surpassing the up-to-11 criteria, exhibiting VP 3-4, or presenting extrahepatic metastases. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Employing the mRECIST criteria, the ORR was 62.2 %, wherein 18 (22.0 %) patients achieved complete response, 33 (40.2 %) demonstrated partial response, 21 (25.6 %) maintained stable disease, and 10 (12.2 %) exhibited disease progression. Impressively, 11 (13.4 %) patients were converted to resectable HCC and underwent curative hepatectomy. The median PFS was 10.1 months (95 % CI, 8.4 to NA), and the median OS was still pending. At the one-year mark, the OS and PFS rates were 92.8 % (95 % CI, 86.1 to 100.0) and 42.9 % (95 % CI, 31.3 to 58.7), respectively. 79 (96.3 %) experienced TRAEs, and 39 (47.6 %) had grade 3-4 TRAEs, though no treatment-related death was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the potential of the A+B and TACE-HAIC combined treatment for HTB-uHCC patients, marking it as a viable therapeutic option, given its potent efficacy and tolerable safety profile.

Real-world efficacy and safety of TACE-HAIC combined with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors in initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Local treatment may function synergistically with immunotherapy and targeted agents. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with initially uHCC who received combined treatment of TACE-HAIC combined with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors from July 2020 to February 2023. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and conversion surgery rate (CSR), whereas the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: After screening, a total of 62 patients were selected for this study. The overall median OS was 18.2 (95% CI 16.24-20.16) months and median PFS was 9.2 (95% CI 7.24-11.16) months. Based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria and RECIST v1.1 criteria, ORR was 67.7% (42/62), and the DCR was 90.3% (56/62), the CSR was 27.4% (17/62). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were transaminitis (56.4%, 35/62), nausea and vomiting (43.5%, 27/62), thrombocytopenia (37.1%, 23/62), abdominal pain (33.9%, 21/62), and fever (33.9%, 21/62). CONCLUSIONS: TKIs combined with PD-1 inhibitors plus TACE-HAIC therapy represents an effective and tolerable treatment option in patients with uHCC. Patients undergoing surgery after combination therapy may have survival benefits.

Downstaging strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

A significant number of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are usually diagnosed in advanced stages, that leads to inability to achieve cure. Palliative options are focusing on downstaging a locally advanced disease. It is well-supported in the literature that patients with HCC who undergo successful conversion therapy followed by curative-intent surgery may achieve a significant survival benefit compared to those who receive chemotherapy alone or those who are successfully downstaged with conversion therapy but not treated with surgery. Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy can be a potential downstaging strategy, since recent studies have demonstrated excellent outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastatic disease as well as primary liver malignancies.

First-line hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and PD-(L)1 inhibitors versus systemic chemotherapy alone or with PD-(L)1 inhibitors in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Limited treatment options exist for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), with systemic chemotherapy (SC) serving as the primary approach. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of first-line hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib and PD-(L)1 inhibitors (HLP) compared to SC combined with PD-(L)1 inhibitors (SCP) or SC alone in treating unresectable ICC. METHODS: Patient with unresectable ICC who underwent first-line treatment with HLP, SCP or SC from January 2016 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The study evaluated and compared efficacy and safety outcomes across the three treatment groups. RESULTS: The study comprised 42, 49, and 50 patients in the HLP, SCP, and SC groups, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were 30.0, 10.2, and 6.5 months for HLP, SCP, and SC groups. While the SC group had a median overall survival (OS) time of 21.8 months, the HLP and SCP groups hadn't reached median OS. The HLP group demonstrated significantly superior PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.014) compared to the others. Moreover, the HLP group exhibited the highest objective response rate (ORR) at 50.0% and the highest disease control rate (DCR) at 88.1%, surpassing the SC group (ORR, 6.0%; DCR, 52.0%) and SCP group (ORR, 18.4%; DCR, 73.5%) (p < 0.05). Generally, the HLP group reported fewer grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs) compared with others. CONCLUSION: In contrast to systemic chemotherapy with or without PD-(L)1 inhibitors, the triple combination therapy incorporating HAIC, lenvatinib, and PD-(L)1 inhibitors showcased favorable survival benefits and manageable adverse events for unresectable ICC.

Similar Efficacy Between Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy For Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The landscape of treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including immune checkpoint inhibitors, has expanded significantly. However, unresectable HCC patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) continue to face a poor prognosis. This investigation examined the survival outcomes and determinants influencing survival rates in advanced HCC patients with PVTT undergoing treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ+BEV) or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 2003 and June 2023, 48 advanced HCC with PVTT underwent treatment with either ATZ+BEV (16 patients) or HAIC (32 patients). RESULTS: The analysis revealed no significant disparities in overall survival (OS) or treatment efficacy between the ATZ+BEV and HAIC groups (ATZ+BEV: 10.0 months, HAIC: 15.3 months). Treatment with either ATZ+BEV or HAIC resulted in minimal alterations in the ALBI score and preserved hepatic function. Independent prognostic factors for OS, identified via multivariate logistic regression, included serum α-fetoprotein levels >400 ng/ml [hazard ratio (HR)=1.94; p=0.001], the existence of more than five tumors (HR=1.55; p=0.043), and the Child-Pugh score (HR=2.53; p=0.002). CONCLUSION: This investigation revealed no significant variance in OS and response rates between patients receiving ATZ+BEV and those treated with HAIC. The survival of advanced HCC patients with PVTT is intricately linked to the preservation of liver function, emphasizing the necessity for additional research to enhance treatment approaches for this patient population.

Safety and Effectiveness of Portal Vein Embolization after Hepatic Arterial Infusion Therapy.

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is a tool potentially useful for inducing future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with advanced hepatic malignancies who are at high risk of hepatic insufficiency if treated with surgical resection. However, the safety and effectiveness of PVE in the context of patients who have undergone hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) are unknown. This retrospective, single-center study identified 9 patients who underwent PVE after HAI between January 2015 and December 2022. There were no major adverse events, including biliary injury or high-grade liver failure. Analysis showed an increase in standardized FLR from 21.1% (SEM ± 2.4) to 34.8% (SEM ± 2.1) over 9.8 weeks (SEM ± 1.2), with a mean kinetic growth rate of 1.9% (interquartile range, 0.9%-2.4%). Patients who have undergone HAI therapy should not be excluded from consideration of PVE as part of their operative clearance strategy.