RÉSUMÉ
AIM: To explore how experiences of increased loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic affected emotional distress and changes in perceptions of physical and mental health. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Data from the Socio-Economic Impacts of Covid-19 Survey, a national survey administered to 5033 adults in August and September 2020 in the United States, was utilized in this study. Structural equation modelling was used to analyse the associations between increased experiences of loneliness during the pandemic, emotional distress and changes in perceptions of physical and mental health. RESULTS: Among the 47% of participants who reported increased experiences of loneliness during the pandemic, 31% reported a poorer perceived change in mental health and 12% reported a poorer perceived change in physical health. Increased experiences of loneliness during the pandemic were significantly associated with emotional distress and poorer perceived mental and physical health changes. Emotional distress significantly mediated the effect between increased experiences of loneliness during the pandemic and poorer perceived mental and physical health changes. These findings highlight the importance of producing preventative actions to combat increased loneliness and emotional distress during and after future pandemics in order to improve health perceptions, which can result in negative health outcomes over time.
Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Détresse psychologique , Adulte , Humains , Solitude , Pandémies , Santé mentale , Études transversalesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars program was conceptualized as not only promoting the growth and development of early-career faculty but as enhancing the research infrastructure of scholars' schools of nursing. PURPOSE: At the completion of the scholars' three years of support, deans/directors were asked to provide feedback regarding the institutional impact of the scholars' participation in the program. METHODS: Phone interviews were conducted on the first five completed cohorts and a six-item questionnaire was developed to obtain some quantitative data. DISCUSSION: The program was viewed as having accelerated the scholars' leadership and scholarship, and their influence within the school/university and regionally/nationally. Deans/directors generally agreed that the scholars' experience helped build the school's research portfolio. CONCLUSION: Looking back on how the participating schools of nursing fared, one can say that the program's institutional expectations were achieved most of the time. The program helped scholars build their own reputations and that in turn had consequences for the school's standing as a whole. A number of components are described that can be replicated singly or in various combinations by schools/universities interested in adopting aspects of this program.
Sujet(s)
Programme d'études , Enseignement spécialisé en soins infirmiers/organisation et administration , Corps enseignant et administratif de l'école d'infirmières/enseignement et éducation , Corps enseignant et administratif de l'école d'infirmières/organisation et administration , Fondations/organisation et administration , Leadership , Compétence professionnelle , Adulte , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Mise au point de programmes , Évaluation de programme , Perfectionnement du personnel/méthodes , États-UnisRÉSUMÉ
The University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center (UNMHSC) adopted a new Vision to work with community partners to help New Mexico make more progress in health and health equity than any other state by 2020. UNMHSC recognized it would be more successful in meeting communities' health priorities if it better aligned its own educational, research, and clinical missions with their needs. National measures that compare states on the basis of health determinants and outcomes were adopted in 2013 as part of Vision 2020 target measures for gauging progress toward improved health and health care in New Mexico. The Vision focused the institution's resources on strengthening community capacity and responding to community priorities via pipeline education, workforce development programs, community-driven and community-focused research, and community-based clinical service innovations, such as telehealth and "health extension." Initiatives with the greatest impact often cut across institutional silos in colleges, departments, and programs, yielding measurable community health benefits. Community leaders also facilitated collaboration by enlisting University of New Mexico educational and clinical resources to better respond to their local priorities. Early progress in New Mexico's health outcomes measures and state health ranking is a promising sign of movement toward Vision 2020.
Sujet(s)
Relations communauté-institution , Priorités en santé , Programmes d'éducation pour la santé/organisation et administration , Déterminants sociaux de la santé , Renforcement des capacités/méthodes , Renforcement des capacités/organisation et administration , Renforcement des capacités/normes , Programmes d'éducation pour la santé/méthodes , Programmes d'éducation pour la santé/normes , Humains , Nouveau Mexique , Études de cas sur les organisations de santé , UniversitésRÉSUMÉ
Health care reform is a high priority on the federal policy agenda. The authors present insights from their experiences as Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health Policy Fellows working in Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office and on the House Committee on Ways and Means. Nursing has many opportunities at this juncture to engage in policy discussions and advance solutions for issues related to increasing quality and access while dampening the escalating cost of care. Strategies where nursing's voice can inform reform conversations include chronic disease management, prevention and health promotion, community-based care, nurse-managed care, interdisciplinary education, safety and quality, use of health information technology, and testing the comparative effectiveness of interventions and delivery systems.
Sujet(s)
Réforme des soins de santé , Politique de santé , Infirmières et infirmiers , Coûts des soins de santé , Accessibilité des services de santé , Politique , Qualité des soins de santéSujet(s)
Compétence clinique , Formation au diplôme infirmier (USA)/organisation et administration , Enseignement spécialisé en soins infirmiers/organisation et administration , Réforme des soins de santé/organisation et administration , Personnel infirmier , Équipe soignante/organisation et administration , Prévision , Besoins et demandes de services de santé , Humains , Personnel infirmier/enseignement et éducation , Personnel infirmier/ressources et distribution , Personnel infirmier/tendances , Soutien financier à la formation/organisation et administration , États-UnisRÉSUMÉ
The nursing profession continues to face many challenges, one of which is an insufficient number of aspiring leaders. The role of an academic leader, specifically that of dean, brings with it unique challenges and opportunities. Shaping a career in academic administration requires careful consideration of the leadership skills necessary to perform in this complex and challenging role. However, it is critical to the future of nursing as a profession that ample numbers of aspiring leaders can successfully make this transition. One can be better prepared to take on this exciting and rewarding leadership opportunity when one understands the challenges deans face, asks questions such as "Do I really want a deanship?," identifies the required leadership skills, defines a career trajectory and pathway, and develops the leadership skills necessary for deans.