[Update on lupus nephritis]. / Update Lupusnephritis.

In addition to the butterfly rash, lupus nephritis is the most specific manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The perspective on this organ manifestation has fundamentally changed as well as the manifestation of SLE itself 40 years after the first multicenter clinical study on lupus nephritis. Even if there is a faint glimpse of hope of a cure, there is still the fight against the problem of nonresponders and also the progressive loss of organ function. This update gives an overview of the current importance of lupus nephritis in the context of the whole SLE disease, of the special features and on the options provided by the new diagnostic and therapeutic developments.

[The subanalysis of Rheuma-VOR demonstrates a considerable need for rheumatological care]. / Die Subanalyse von Rheuma-VOR zeigt den erheblichen Bedarf der rheumatologischen Versorgung auf.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases can prevent consequential damage such as permanently limited mobility and joint or organ damage. Simultaneously, there is an increasing deficit in medical care owing to the lack of rheumatological capacity. Rural regions are particularly affected. OBJECTIVES: The available unconfirmed diagnoses of the study Rheuma-VOR were analysed regarding another definitive inflammatory rheumatic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The returned questionnaires of the rheumatologists participating in Rheuma-VOR were screened for definitive inflammatory rheumatic diseases other than the required diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or spondyloarthritis. RESULTS: Of 910 unconfirmed diagnoses, in 245 patients another definitive diagnosis could be confirmed. A total of 29.8% of the diagnoses corresponded to degenerative joint changes or chronic pain syndrome, whereas 26.1% involved different forms of inflammatory arthritis. The majority of diagnoses (40.5%) were collagenosis or vasculitis, DISCUSSION: The available data show that a rheumatological presentation was indicated for the majority of patients. Owing to the increasing deficits in medical care a prior selection of the patients is crucial to make optimal use of restricted rheumatological capacities.

[Therapeutic effects of complex multimodal rheumatologic treatment in the Rheumatology Center, Rhineland-Palatinate]. / Therapieeffekte der multimodalen rheumatologischen Komplexbehandlung im Rheumazentrum Rheinland-Pfalz.

INTRODUCTION: The concept of complex multimodal rheumatologic treatment (CMRT) has been established for several years in German rheumatologic departments and aims at a multifaceted therapeutic approach to patients with rheumatic diseases. Objective of this study was to examine the therapeutic effect of CMRT in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in an acute rheumatology center. METHODS: The treatment success of CMRT was evaluated by epidemiologic data, patient questionnaires on visual analog scales (VAS) regarding morning stiffness, pain and disease activity (DA), as well as clinical scores (Disease Activity Score 28 [DAS28], Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI], Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index [BASFI]), laboratory inflammation markers (CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and medication in three visits: visit 1 = begin of CMRT; visit 2 = end of CMRT; visit 3 = 3 months after CMRT. RESULTS: In this study 162 patients from the Rheumatology Center, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany (96 (59.3%) RA, 30 (18.8%) AS, 36 (22.2%) PsA) were recruited. Statistical examinations revealed a significant improvement of VAS(DA) (visit 2 versus visit 1: RA: p = 0.02, AS: p < 0.001, PsA: p < 0.001), morning stiffness (RA: p < 0.001, AS: p = 0.03, PsA: p < 0.001) and patient reported pain (all; p < 0.001) in the context of CMRT. In the RA and AS subgroups improvements of DAS28 and BASDAI could also be observed (visit 2 versus visit 1: both; p < 0.001). Moreover, significant improvement of patient reported outcomes could be observed 3 months after CMRT regarding VAS(DA) (RA: p = 0.02 und AS: p = 0.03, morning stiffness (PsA: p = 0.02) and patient reported pain (RA: p = 0.01)). Interestingly, subgroup analyses showed that the therapeutic benefit was independent of the concomitant pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest a therapeutic benefit for patients being treated by CMRT and highlight the high value of this therapeutic concept in patients with systemic-inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

The influence of the SARS-CoV-2 lockdown on patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases on their adherence to immunomodulatory medication: a cross sectional study over 3 months in Germany.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the adherence of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) to their immunomodulatory medication during the three-month lockdown in Germany. METHODS: From 16th March until 15th June 2020, IRD patients from private practices and rheumatology departments were asked to answer a questionnaire addressing their behaviour with respect to their immunomodulating therapy. Eight private practices and nine rheumatology departments that included rheumatology primary care centres and university hospitals participated. A total of 4252 questionnaires were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: The majority of patients (54%) were diagnosed with RA, followed by psoriatic arthritis (14%), ankylosing spondylitis (10%), connective tissue diseases (12%) and vasculitides (6%). Most of the patients (84%) reported to continue their immunomodulatory therapy. Termination of therapy was reported by only 3% of the patients. The results were independent from the type of IRD, the respective immunomodulatory therapy and by whom the patients were treated (private practices vs rheumatology departments). Younger patients (<60 years) reported just as often as older patients to discontinue their therapy. CONCLUSION: The data show that most of the patients continued their therapy in spite of the pandemic. A significant change in behaviour with regard to their immunomodulatory therapy was not observed during the three months of observation. The results support the idea that the immediate release of recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology were well received, supporting the well-established physician-patient relationship in times of a crisis.

[A cross sectional study on patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases in terms of their compliance to their immunsuppressive medication during COVID-19 pandemic]. / Einstellung von Patienten mit entzündlich-rheumatischen Erkrankungen zur immunsuppressiven Therapie im Rahmen der COVID-19 Pandemie ­ eine Situationsanalyse.

The current COVID-19 pandemic inherits an unprecedented challenge for the treating rheumatologists. On the one hand, antirheumatic drugs can increase the risk of infection and potentially deteriorate the course of an infection. On the other hand, an active inflammatory rheumatic disease can also increase the risk for an infection. In the recommendations of the German Society for Rheumatology (www.dgrh.de), it is recommended that our patients continue the antirheumatic therapy to maintain remission or low state of activity despite the pandemic. In this study, patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease were asked in the first weeks of the pandemic on their opinion of their immunomodulating therapy. The result shows that over 90% of the patients followed the recommendation of the rheumatologist to continue the antirheumatic therapy, and only a small percentage of the patients terminated the therapy on their own. This result was independent of the individual anti-rheumatic therapy. Taken together, the results of this study illustrate not only the trustful patient-physician partnership in a threatening situation but also the high impact of state-of-the art recommendations by the respective scientific society.

[Influence of time to diagnosis of patients with systemic sclerosis on lung function and comorbidities: a preclinical and clinical analysis]. / Einfluss der Zeitdauer bis zur Diagnose einer systemischen Sklerose auf Lungenfunktion und Komorbiditäten: eine präklinische und klinische Analyse.

BACKGROUND: Scleroderma or systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune rheumatic connective tissue disease. The clinical picture is manifold and symptoms can vary greatly between different patients. All manifestations are possible ranging from isolated skin involvement up to systemic disease with multiple organ manifestations. Due to this inhomogeneous clinical picture, it often takes years until the correct diagnosis is made and adequate treatment is started. METHODS: Patients with the main or secondary diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (M34) between 2002 and 2017 were retrospectively recorded from the patient databases of the ACURA clinic for acute rheumatology in Bad Kreuznach and the data were evaluated. Of special interest were pulmonary parameters over the course of time. Furthermore, standardized questionnaires were distributed to general practitioners in Rhineland-Palatinate via the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians as well as to patients admitted to the hospital (2016-2017). RESULTS: A total of 135 patients could be evaluated. For women the median age of onset was 52 years (interquartile range, IQR 44-64 years) and for men the median age of onset was 49 years (IQR 38-54 years). Lung involvement was detected in 54% of the cases. Including the individual time to diagnosis, there was a significant worsening of the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (73% vs. 56%, p = 0.046) between earlier (<4 months) and later (4-18 months) diagnoses, which also persisted in the follow-up (74% vs. 53%) despite adequate treatment. CONCLUSION: A rapid diagnosis within 3 months of the onset of Raynaud's phenomenon seems to play a key role in the preservation of lung function.

[Physical activity, exercise and nutrition in rheumatism : Adjuvant treatment options for inflammatory-rheumatic diseases]. / Körperliche Aktivität, Training und Ernährung bei Rheuma : Adjuvante Behandlungsoptionen bei entzündlich-rheumatischen Erkrankungsbildern.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The positive effects of physical activity, physical training and an adaptation of diet on health have been scientifically proven for many diseases. Focusing on inflammatory rheumatic diseases and their potential comorbidities, positive effects are assumed from these two adjuvant treatment opportunities, which are examined in more detail in this review. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on a literature search, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCT studies, reviews and recommendations from professional societies were included. RESULTS: Physical activity and training show positive effects on the disease itself and also on its comorbidities with existing certainty. In addition, the exercise and training recommendations of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) and the American Heart Association (AHA) provide recommendations, which were adapted by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) to control intensity, duration and training extent. Nutritional medical approaches also provide preventive and rehabilitative beneficial possibilities. DISCUSSION: The increase of physical activity, regular physical training and the adaptation of diet should be a basic additive component of the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases. In individual sub-aspects, the study situation is very heterogeneous and requires further research.

[Experiences and results from Rheuma-VOR]. / Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus Rheuma-VOR.

Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondylarthritis are the most common chronic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. For all three diseases an early diagnosis and initiation of treatment is crucial. The proof of concept network study "Rheuma-VOR" is a further developed version of the predecessor project ADAPTHERA and was extended to several federal states. The aim of this prospective study is to improve the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondylarthritis and thus positively impact the quality of care for patients with the help of multidisciplinary coordinating centers. To date 3710 disease-specific questionnaires from patients with the suspected diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or axial spondylarthritis from 1298 different primary care providers were registered in the multidisciplinary coordination centers. A total of 1958 appointments were made with 1 of the 53 participating rheumatology specialists. In 876 patients, 1 of the 3 rheumatic diseases was diagnosed in an early stage. The waiting period was on average 42.5 days depending on the federal state, which is well below the nationwide average. It should also be noted that the coordinated cooperation and risk stratification of the Rheuma-VOR coordination centers relieved the capacity of rheumatology specialists by 1281 appointments (34.5%). In addition, the 2­week Rheuma Bus Tour and the accompanying initiatives in Rhineland-Palatinate (Rheuma-VOR screening app and the triage consultation) are showing first promising positive results.

[Early recognition and screening consultation: a necessary way to improve early detection and treatment in rheumatology? : Overview of the early recognition and screening consultation models for rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in Germany]. / Früh- und Screeningsprechstunden: Ein notwendiger Weg zur besseren Frühversorgung in der internistischen Rheumatologie? : Rheumatologische Früh- und Screeningsprechstundenmodelle in Deutschland.

In order to reduce the prognostically relevant time interval between the initial manifestation of a rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease and diagnosis as well as the consecutive initiation of an appropriate treatment, several rheumatological centers in Germany have improved the access to initial rheumatologic evaluation by establishing early recognition/screening clinics at their respective sites. Corresponding models located at Altoetting·Burghausen, Bad Pyrmont, Berlin Buch, Duesseldorf, Heidelberg, Herne, Mannheim as well as supraregional/multicenter initiatives Rheuma Rapid, RhePort and Rheuma-VOR are presented in this overview along with the respective characteristics, potential advantages and disadvantages, but also first evaluation results of several models. The aim of this publication is to promote early detection of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases as one of the most important challenges in current rheumatology by encouraging further rheumatologic centers and practices to launch their own early recognition/screening consultation model on the basis of aspects presented herein.

[ADAPTHERA-Statewide cross-sectoral care network for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis shows sustained remission in standard care]. / ADAPTHERA ­ Landesweit transsektorales Versorgungsnetzwerk für Patienten mit früher rheumatoider Arthritis zeigt anhaltende Remissionen in der Regelversorgung.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The majority of patients in Germany miss out on the necessity of early diagnosis and initiation of therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) caused by considerable structural deficits in the health care system. The challenge is to reconcile the individual demand for the best possible therapy result with a sustainable expenditure of resources. METHODS: The cross-sectoral regional care network ADAPTHERA aims to improve early RA diagnosis and treatment in Rhineland-Palatinate. The retrospective triage analyses of suspected early onset RA patients was performed by tracing the selection process of all available enquiries (n = 1045). For analysis of the clinical course of the disease, a subset comprising 143 patients with a minimum observation time of 12 months (5 consecutive visits) was available. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected quarter yearly, self-administered questionnaires were filled out and the treatment was adapted if necessary. RESULTS: A total of 454 patients were included. The mean waiting time was 23.9 (SD = 18) days. The mean observation period in the subcohort was 29.2 (SD = 12.7) months, with about 50% of the patients presenting within 3 months. Almost 75% of the patients were in remission after 2 years. A sustained remission could be described for 74.8% (6 months) and 53.5% (12 months), respectively. Especially patients with rapid remission induction benefited in terms of longer remissions (p = 0.03). A very early stage of the disease (VERA) was associated with a rarely necessary biologic therapy (p = 0.022). DISCUSSION: The approach of a supply network is not a panacea, but it might improve healthcare for patients with early onset RA. In order to minimize resource utilization, a pinpoint referral and accurate triage of potential cases are crucial.

[Depressive symptoms in early rheumatoid arthritis : Within the rheumatism network ADAPTHERA]. / Depressive Symptomatik bei früher rheumatoider Arthritis : Innerhalb des Rheumanetzwerks ADAPTHERA.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For patients with established rheumatoid arthritis and also early arthritis an increased prevalence of depression has been described. For a better understanding of depression in early arthritis patients, depression prevalences of a German early arthritis cohort were examined, with a focus on disease activity, anti-CCP status, disease duration and functional capacity over a period of 2 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The evaluation was based on the early arthritis cohort ADAPTHERA from Rhineland-Palatinate. The inclusion criterion was a symptom duration before diagnosis of a maximum of 1 year. Data from the disease activity score 28 (DAS28), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ, functional status), the WHO-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5, well-being and depressive symptoms) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9, depressive symptoms) were collected. RESULTS: At the beginning, 43.5% of patients had depressive symptoms (WHO-5 > 28). After the 2 year follow-up the percentage of patients with depressive symptoms had reduced to 20.8%. Correlations with disease activity according to DAS28 and the function of HAQ could be confirmed. There was no correlation between depressive symptoms and anti-CCP status (p = 0.431) or duration from symptom onset to diagnosis (p = 0.671). CONCLUSION: Screening of early arthritis patients for the presence of depressive symptoms is of essential importance. Patients seem to be at high risk of developing depressive symptoms especially at the beginning of the disease and when showing high disability and poor results on disease activity score (DAS28 and visual analog scale).

[Medical care situation of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis in Germany : Medical care situation of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA): ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from the perspective of rheumatologists in private practice and hospitals in Germany-Results of the research project "SpA Loop-Life of Outpatients"]. / Versorgungssituation von Patienten mit ankylosierender Spondylitis und Psoriasisarthritis in Deutschland : Versorgungssituation von Patienten mit Spondyloarthritis (SpA): Ankylosierende Spondylitis (AS) und Psoriasisarthritis (PsA) aus der Sicht von niedergelassenen und in Kliniken tätigen Rheumatologen in Deutschland ­ Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojekts "SpA Loop ­ Life of Outpatients".

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of spondyloarthritis (SpA) in Germany is approximately 1-1.4% and includes predominantly axial SpA (axSpA) and predominantly peripheral SpA. Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) belongs to the group of axial SpA but also exhibits peripheral manifestations. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can show purely peripheral or also axial manifestations. The total prevalence of SpA in Germany is approximately 1­1.4%, the prevalence of AS is ca. 0.5% and PsA 0.2-1.4%. Patients with AS are mainly treated by internal medical rheumatologists but in many places also basically treated by general practitioners and orthopedists. Patients with PsA are mainly diagnosed and treated by rheumatologists and dermatologists working in private practice or in clinical settings. Besides the control of inflammatory activity and prevention or slowing down of the characteristic disease progression, including irreversible structural changes, the main objectives of patients as well as treating physicians are particularly freedom from pain and a quality of life comparable to non-affected persons. Decisive for successful treatment are an early diagnosis and initiation of adequate therapy as well as regular monitoring of disease activity including treatment adjustment taking the needs of the patient into consideration; however, it is unknown how often this is actually successful in routine daily practice in Germany. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the SpA Loop research project was to display the current medical care situation of patients with AS and PsA treated in private practices and hospitals for rheumatology in Germany focusing on patient/physician profiles as well as the diagnostics and treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The instrument for the survey was a standardized questionnaire with 29 multiple choice and perception questions that was distributed to medical specialists in the field of internal medicine and rheumatology. RESULTS: A high accordance between rheumatologists in private practice and in hospitals was observed with respect to the presentation and perception of the current medical care situation for patients with AS and PsA in Germany. Differences were only occasionally found. CONCLUSION: The results of this research project reflect the current status of the medical care situation of AS and PsA patients in Germany. They provide information on which areas of the medical care situation can selectively be improved as well as on interesting aspects and points of discussion with respect to the patient population treated.

Rituximab in routine care of severe active rheumatoid arthritis : A prospective, non-interventional study in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety, effectiveness and onset of effect of rituximab (RTX) in routine clinical treatment of severe, active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Prospective, multi-centre, non-interventional study in rheumatological outpatient clinics or private practices in Germany. RTX-naïve adult patients were to receive RTX according to marketing authorisation and at their physician's discretion. Also according to their physician's discretion, patients could receive a second cycle of RTX (re-treatment = treatment continuation). Major outcome was the change in Disease Activity Score based on 28-joints count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) over 24 weeks and during 6 months of re-treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 1653 patients received at least one cycle RTX; 99.2% of these had received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) pre-treatment and 75.5% anti-tumor necrosis factor(TNF)­α pre-treatment. After a mean interval of 8.0 months, 820 patients received RTX re-treatment. Mean DAS28-ESR decreased from 5.3 at baseline to 3.8 after 24 weeks (-1.5 [95% confidence interval, CI: -1.6; -1.4]), and from 4.1 at start of cycle 2 to 3.5 at study end (change from baseline: -1.8 [95% CI: -2.0; -1.7]). Improvements in DAS28-ESR and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score occurred mainly during the first 12 weeks of RTX treatment, with further DAS28-ESR improvement until week 24 or month 6 of re-treatment. Improvements in DAS28-ESR and EULAR responses were more pronounced in seropositive patients. RF was a predictor of DAS28-ESR change to study end. Safety analysis showed the established profile of RTX. CONCLUSION: RTX was safe and effective in a real-life setting with rapid and sustained improvement in RA signs and symptoms.

A 6-month open-label extension study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Objective To evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) beyond 1 year. Methods This was a 24-week, open-label extension following a 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of belimumab SC. Patients who completed the double-blind phase were eligible to enter the open-label phase. All patients received weekly belimumab 200 mg SC plus standard SLE therapy. Outcome measures included safety and efficacy (SLE Response Index (SRI) and SLE Flare Index (SFI) rates), and changes in biomarker and B cell levels. Results Of 677 patients who completed the 52-week, double-blind phase, 662 entered the open-label phase; 206 had previously received placebo and 456 had previously received belimumab. Despite differences in total belimumab exposure (24 weeks in the placebo-to-belimumab group versus 76 weeks in the belimumab group), the proportions of patients experiencing more than one adverse event (AE) or a serious AE in the open-label phase were similar between groups (placebo-to-belimumab: 51.5 and 6.8%; belimumab: 48.2 and 5.5%, respectively). Most AEs were mild/moderate in severity. Efficacy was maintained through the extension phase. An SRI response was achieved by 16.1% of patients in the placebo-to-belimumab group and 76.3% patients in the belimumab group. Furthermore, 1.0% of patients in the placebo-to-belimumab group and 2.6% of patients in the belimumab group experienced a severe SFI flare. Conclusion Belimumab SC was well tolerated and efficacy was maintained during the extension phase of this study. The safety profile of belimumab SC is consistent with that of previous experience with belimumab. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01484496.

Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Belimumab in Anti-Double-Stranded DNA-Positive, Hypocomplementemic Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of belimumab, a human immunoglobulin monoclonal antibody against B lymphocyte stimulator, in a subset of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who were hypocomplementemic (C3 <90 mg/dl and/or C4 <10 mg/dl) and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) positive (≥30 IU/ml) at baseline. METHODS: In this phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (BEL112341; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01484496), patients with moderate to severe SLE (Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index [SELENA-SLEDAI] score ≥8) were randomized (2:1) to receive weekly subcutaneous (SC) belimumab 200 mg or placebo, plus standard SLE therapy, for 52 weeks. The primary end point was SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response rate at week 52. Secondary end points were time to severe flare and reduction in corticosteroid dose (weeks 40-52). Safety was assessed throughout. RESULTS: Of the 836 patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, 356 were hypocomplementemic and anti-dsDNA positive at baseline (108 in the placebo group and 248 in the SC belimumab 200 mg group). Compared with placebo, the belimumab group contained more SRI-4 responders (47.2% versus 64.6%; P = 0.0014), had a lower incidence of severe flare according to the SELENA-SLEDAI flare index (31.5% versus 14.1%), and had a greater percentage of patients who reduced corticosteroid dosage by ≥25% to ≤7.5 mg/day during weeks 40-52 (11.4% versus 20.7%; P = 0.0844). Adverse events (AEs) were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that in hypocomplementemic, anti-dsDNA-positive SLE patients, weekly SC belimumab 200 mg significantly improves SRI-4 response, decreases severe flare incidence, and reduces corticosteroid use versus placebo; a trend toward greater benefit compared with the overall ITT population was observed. AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of belimumab.

Renal tubular epithelial cell-derived BAFF expression mediates kidney damage and correlates with activity of proliferative lupus nephritis in mouse and men.

B-cell activating factor of the tumour necrosis factor family (BAFF) is a cytokine, mainly produced by hematopoietic cells (e.g. monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells), indispensable for B-cell maturation. The BLISS studies have demonstrated that blocking BAFF by the human monoclonal antibody belimumab is a valuable therapeutic approach in patients with clinically and serologically active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the defined sources of BAFF, which contributes to SLE, are still unclear. Recent findings show that BAFF expression is not restricted to myeloid cells. Since lupus nephritis is the main cause of morbidity and mortality for SLE patients, the aim of this study was to investigate whether renal tubular epithelial cells (TEC) are an important source of BAFF and thus may contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of SLE. We found BAFF expression both in cultured murine and human TEC. These results could be verified with in situ data from the kidney. Moreover, BAFF expression in the kidneys of lupus-prone MRL- Faslpr mice correlated with disease activity, and BAFF expression on TEC in biopsies of patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis showed a correlation with the histopathological activity index. In vitro functional assays revealed an autocrine loop of BAFF with its binding receptors on TEC, resulting in a strong induction of colony stimulating factor-1. Finally, we identified divergent effects of BAFF on TEC depending on the surrounding milieu ('inflammatory versus non-inflammatory'). Taken together, our findings indicate that renal-derived BAFF may play an important role in the pathophysiology of the systemic autoimmune disease SLE.

[Evidence-based recommendations for diagnostics and treatment of gouty arthritis in the specialist sector : S2e guidelines of the German Society of Rheumatology in cooperation with the AWMF]. / Evidenzbasierte Empfehlung zur Diagnostik und Therapie der Gichtarthritis im fachärztlichen Sektor : S2e-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie (DGRh) in Kooperation mit der AWMF.

Due to the increasing prevalence of gout, particularly in old age, the disease is becoming of increasing importance in Germany. Gout is one of the most common forms of recurrent inflammatory arthritis and is induced by the deposition of monosodium urate crystals in synovial fluid and other tissues. The principal goals of therapy in chronic gout are the symptomatic treatment of the acute joint inflammation and the causal treatment of the underlying metabolic cause, the hyperuricemia. Only a consistent and permanent reduction of the serum uric acid level ultimately results in an efficient avoidance of further gout attacks and therefore the prevention of structural damage. Due to an often inadequate treatment of gout, the target of healing the disease is often not achieved. A correct and timely diagnosis and adequate assessment of comorbidities associated with gout are, however, of substantial importance for patient and physician to achieve remission of the disease. In order to create a solid basis for a timely and effective treatment of affected patients, in 2016 the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) initiated the development of S2e guidelines on gouty arthritis for specialists. This article summarizes these S2e guidelines on the management of gouty arthritis in the specialist sector.

[The regional network ADAPTHERA : Rheumatology care through coordinated cooperation: comprehensive, trans-sectoral, covering all health insurance. Initial results]. / Das landesweite Netzwerk ADAPTHERA : Erste Ergebnisse einer flächendeckenden, krankenkassenübergreifenden und transsektoralen rheumatologischen Versorgung.

The aim of the rheumatology network ADAPTHERA ("risk-adapted rheumatology therapy") is to achieve a comprehensive improvement in rheumatology care by coordinating treatment in a regional, trans-sectoral network. Accompanying biomedical research projects, training concepts, and the construction of a rheumatology register (gathering data and biomaterials) should furthermore ensure the stable and sustainable optimisation of care. In the pilot phase (2012-2015) the focus of the ADAPTHERA network, required as a "regional key project" within the framework of the Initiative on Health Economy of Rheinland-Palatinate (RL-P), Germany, was placed on the optimisation of the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, where it is well-known that there is a significant care deficit.Through the intensive, stable, and coordinated cooperation of all health care partners in the field of rheumatology (registered general practitioners and orthopaedic specialists, registered core rheumatologists as well as the Association of Rheumatology of RL-P) a unique regional, comprehensive offer with verifiable care optimisation has been established in RL-P. The network is supported by outstanding collaboration with the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians and the self-help organisation Rheumatology League.The aims that were established at the start of the project will be achieved by the end of the pilot phase:- significant improvement in the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (an average of 23.7 days until diagnosis by rheumatologists)- access covering all health insurance (regardless of the particular scheme the patients belong to)- comprehensive (verifiable participation of general practitioners from all over RL-P)- data and biomaterials collection, established as a basis for biomarker research, and a rheumatology register for RL-P.

Impact of concomitant medication use on belimumab efficacy and safety in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Practicing physicians have requested efficacy and safety data for belimumab, when used with specific systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) medications. This was a post hoc analysis of pooled efficacy and safety data from patients who received belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard of care (SoC) or placebo (SoC) in two Phase III, randomized trials, BLISS-52 and BLISS-76. Patients were categorized into four groups based on baseline concomitant medication usage: steroids only; antimalarials (AM) only; steroids + AM; or steroids + AM + immunosuppressants (IS). The primary endpoint was the SLE Responder Index (SRI) at Week 52. SRI over time and individual SRI components were secondary endpoints. Time to first flare and changes in concomitant medications were exploratory endpoints. Safety was assessed using adverse event (AE) reporting. Across 834 patients, steroids + AM was the largest group (n = 346, 41.5%) and AM only was the smallest (n = 77, 9.2%). Disease duration was shortest in the steroids + AM group (5.7 years vs 6.4-7.1 years); SELENA-SLEDAI scores were similar across groups. At Week 52, the percentage of SRI responders was greatest in the steroids + AM group for belimumab 10 mg/kg (59%) compared with placebo (44%); treatment response and SRI component improvements were also observed across other groups. The probability of experiencing an SLE flare was reduced in the steroids-only group for patients who received belimumab 10 mg/kg compared with placebo (64.3% vs 78.1%; hazard ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.96). There was little or no change in daily AM or IS dose in any group. For all groups, there was a general decrease in steroid dose over time; a quarter to a third of patients experienced decreased steroid doses at Week 52. The overall safety profile was similar across treatment arms and concomitant medication groups, with the exception of serious AEs in the steroids + AM group (belimumab 10 mg/kg 16%, placebo 8%). The efficacy and safety of belimumab in combination with SoC was demonstrated for various groupings of steroids, AM and IS. These findings may improve the understanding of the safety and efficacy of adding belimumab to different treatments.