RÉSUMÉ
Background Applying topical vancomycin has shown a decrease in the likelihood of surgical site infections (SSIs) in surgeries linked to a heightened risk of severe and resistant infections. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of this prophylactic approach has not been assessed in open ankle surgeries with internal fixation. Objective This study aimed to assess whether topical vancomycin diminishes the risk of SSI in patients with ankle fractures undergoing open reduction with internal fixation. Methods A randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. The control group received the standard prophylactic treatment with IV cephalothin 1 g, while the intervention group was administered topical vancomycin (1 g) in addition to the standard prophylactic treatment. The main outcomes were the SSI rates at 14 days, 28 days, and three months post-surgery, based on relevant clinical signs and laboratory tests. Results One hundred thirty-two patients were randomized (51.2% female), with 66 subjects included in each intervention arm. A total of 97.7% of them completed the study. Both groups were homogeneous in baseline characteristics. There were two SSIs in both the vancomycin group (3.3%) and the control group (3.5%), with no statistical differences (p = 0.945). The microorganisms isolated as causal agents were Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii. By the three-month follow-up, no infections were noted in both intervention groups. Conclusion These results indicate that the topical administration of vancomycin may not represent an advantage in preventing SSI in ankle fractures requiring open reduction with internal fixation at the three-month postoperative stage.
RÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Gartland Type III supracondylar humerus fractures are commonly treated using closed reduction followed by percutaneous pin fixation. However, conversion to open reduction may be necessary if closed reduction fails. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with failed closed reduction and provide a theoretical basis for clinical decision-making in the treatment of Gartland Type III fractures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on children with Gartland Type III supracondylar humerus fracture who underwent surgical treatment between April 2017 and June 2018. Based on whether or not the closed reduction was successful, patients were split into the open reduction group and the closed reduction group. Within the closed reduction group, subgroup analysis based on surgery duration was carried out. Data were collected from medical records and X-ray images. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were utilized to evaluate the relationship between variables and failed closed reduction. RESULTS: The study included 36 patients in the open reduction group and 135 patients in the closed reduction group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of angle (P=0.024, OR=3.199), rotation (P=0.000, OR=6.359), skin creases (P=0.013, OR=4.077), anterior-posterior displacement ratio (P=0.011, OR=4.337), fracture angle in the anteroposterior view (P=0.014, OR=0.939), and fracture distal displacement direction (P=0.002, OR=5.384) were independent risk factors for failed closed reduction. Subgroup analysis showed that fracture distal displacement direction (P=0.013), skin folds (P=0.013), lateral displacement ratio (P=0.016), and anterior-posterior displacement value (P=0.005) significantly influenced the duration of closed reduction surgery. CONCLUSION: The presence of sharp angle or rotation at the fracture ends, skin folds on the anterior elbow, minor anterior-posterior displacement of the fracture, higher medial inclination of the fracture plane, and distal fracture displacement towards the radial side are independent risk factors for failed closed reduction in pediatric Gartland Type III supracondylar humerus fracture.
RÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Bipolar fractures involving segmental fractures of the lateral and proximal clavicles are exceptionally rare, with only isolated cases documented in the literature. Such fractures may easily be overlooked during the initial presentation. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 35-year-old male with deformation in the middle segment of the clavicle following a road traffic accident (RTA). On radiography, the injury was initially thought to be a lateral clavicle fracture combined with sternoclavicular joint dislocation but was later changed to a bipolar clavicle fracture intraoperatively. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course with excellent functional outcomes 14 months after surgery. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: A bipolar clavicle fracture is the result of direct trauma to the shoulder region commonly following RTA. Bipolar injuries can be diagnosed based on clinical findings and radiographic evaluation using plain X-rays and aided by computed tomography (CT) scans in doubtful scenarios. With a paucity of guidelines regarding the management of bipolar clavicle fractures most reported cases have been managed operatively with open reduction and internal fixation using locking plates and screws. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its rarity, bipolar clavicle fractures can be easily missed, necessitating a high index of suspicion and detailed evaluation of suspected cases. Appropriate initial and definitive management through operative fixation can lead to optimal outcomes.
RÉSUMÉ
Introduction: Distal radius fractures are a common injury of the hand and wrist that often require intensive rehabilitation. We sought to identify risk factors associated with discharge to a post-acute care facility following distal radius fracture repair. Methods: The 2011 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program® (NSQIP) database was queried for all Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes that corresponded with open distal radius fracture repair. Patients with concomitant traumatic injuries were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative factors, laboratory data, and surgical details were collected. Our primary outcome was to determine postoperative discharge destination: home versus a post-acute care facility, and to identify factors that predict discharge to post-acute care facility. Secondary outcomes included unplanned readmission, reoperation, and complications. Results: Between 2011 and 2016, a total of 12,001 patients underwent open distal radius fracture repair and had complete information for their discharge. Of these analyzed patients, 3.24% (n = 389) were discharged to rehabilitation facilities. The following factors were identified on multivariate analysis to have an association with discharge to a post-acute care facility: 65 years or older, White race, underweight, using steroids preoperatively, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification > 2, admitted from a nursing home or already hospitalized, anemic, undergoing bilateral surgery, wound classification other than clean, and complications prior to discharge. Conclusion: Factors identified by our study to have associations with discharge to post-acute care facilities following distal radius fracture repair can help in appropriate patient counseling and triage from the hospital to home versus a post-acute care facility.
Introduction: Les fractures du radius distal sont des blessures courantes de la main et du poignet qui exigent souvent une réadaptation intensive. Les chercheurs ont voulu déterminer les facteurs de risque associés au congé dans un établissement de soins post-aigus après la réparation d'une fracture du radius distal. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont fouillé la base de données 2011-2016 des NSQIP pour extraire tous les codes CPT (terminologie procédurale actuelle) qui correspondaient aux réparations des fractures ouvertes du radius distal. Les patients atteints d'autres blessures traumatiques ont été exclus. Les chercheurs ont colligé les caractéristiques démographiques des patients, leurs maladies sous-jacentes, les facteurs périopératoires, les données de laboratoire et l'information chirurgicale. Le résultat primaire consistait à déterminer la destination du congé postopératoire, soit le domicile ou l'établissement de soins postaigus, et à établir quels facteurs permettent de prédire un congé dans un établissement de soins postaigus. Les résultats secondaires incluaient des réadmissions non planifiées, la reprise de l'opération et les complications. Résultats: Entre 2011 et 2016, un total de 12 001 patients ont subi la réparation d'une fracture ouverte du radius distal et reçu de l'information complète lors de leur congé. De ce nombre, 3,24% (n = 389) ont obtenu leur congé dans des établissements de réadaptation. L'analyse multivariée a établi que les facteurs suivants étaient associés à un congé dans un établissement de soins postaigus : un âge de 65 ans ou plus, la race blanche, l'insuffisance pondérale, la prise de stéroïdes après l'opération, une classification d'ASA supérieure à 2, l'admission à partir d'un centre de soins de longue durée ou le fait d'être déjà hospitalisé, l'anémie, la chirurgie bilatérale, une classification des plaies autres que propre et des complications avant le congé. Conclusion: La présente étude a déterminé que certains facteurs associés au congé dans un établissement de soins postaigus après une réparation du radius distal peuvent contribuer à des conseils appropriés aux patients et à un triage de l'hôpital vers le domicile plutôt que vers un autre établissement.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Pedicled abdominal flaps are a widely used surgical technique for forearm reconstruction in patients with soft tissue defects. However, some drawbacks include restricted flap size, partial flap loss, and donor-site morbidity. To address these concerns, we present a case of a pedicled abdominal flap using the deep inferior epigastric artery perforators (DIEP) for forearm reconstruction in a patient with a large soft tissue defect. CASE SUMMARY: A 46-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital with forearm injury caused by a pressing machine. A 15 cm × 10 cm soft tissue defect with complete rupture of the ulnar side structures of the forearm was found. One week after orthopedic management of the neurovascular injury and fractures using the first stage of Masquelet technique, the patient was referred to the plastic and reconstructive surgery department for wound coverage. Surgical debridement and negative-pressure wound therapy revealed a 20 cm × 15 cm soft tissue defect. A pedicle abdominal flap with the DIEP was used to cover the defect. Three weeks later, the flap was detached from the abdomen, and the abdominal defect was directly closed. Subsequently, the second stage of Masquelet technique was performed at the fracture site at week 10. Finally, all donor and recipient sites healed without complications, such as flap dehiscence, infection, hematoma, or necrosis. Fracture site osteosynthesis was achieved without complications. CONCLUSION: Pedicled abdominal flap using the DIEP provides a reliable option for forearm reconstruction in patients with large soft tissue defects.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Panfacial bone fractures pose intricate challenges because of severe fragmentation and the loss of landmarks. Surgeons use a variety of reduction techniques, including bottom-up and top-down approaches. This single proportional meta-analysis explores sequencing differences and complications between oral and maxillofacial surgery surgeons (OMSs) and plastic and reconstructive surgeons (PRSs) in treating panfacial bone fractures. METHODS: The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched systematically, and we compiled 14 studies published between 2007 and 2023 involving 1238 patients. A systematic review of the included studies was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, and data on the reduction techniques; total complication rates; and rates of malocclusion, enophthalmos, infection, asymmetry, and esthetic complications were collected. RESULTS: The bottom-up technique was the most prevalent for both types of surgeons (57.1%, 8 out of 14). Malocclusion rates (I2 = 0% for OMSs and 41% for PRSs) were similar between the groups (p = 0.72), but PRSs tended to have a lower enophthalmos rate (I2 = 0% for OMSs and 32% for PRSs) than OMSs (p < 0.01). Infection rates remained consistent across all studies. However, high heterogeneity was observed for the total complication rate (I2 = 94% for OMSs and 85% for PRSs) and asymmetry and esthetic complications (I2 = 88% for OMSs and 92% for PRSs), making direct comparison between the two groups inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the differences in surgical techniques and levels of interest have a greater impact on the outcomes of the panfacial bone fracture than the surgeon's specialty. However, more in-depth studies are needed to accurately pinpoint panfacial bone fracture reduction trends and differences in postoperative complications in the two expert groups.
Sujet(s)
Énophtalmie , Fractures osseuses , Malocclusion dentaire , Chirurgiens , Humains , Os de la face/chirurgie , Fractures osseuses/chirurgie , Malocclusion dentaire/épidémiologie , Malocclusion dentaire/étiologieRÉSUMÉ
Introducción: Las fracturas supracondíleas del húmero en el niño, por lo general, son tratadas de manera quirúrgica, durante esa intervención se pueden presentar situaciones específicas en este tipo de enfermos. Objetivo: Actualizar y brindar información sobre algunas de las situaciones transoperatorias en pacientes con fractura supracondílea del húmero. Métodos: La búsqueda y análisis de la información se realizó en un periodo de 61 días (primero de septiembre al 31 de octubre de 2022) y se emplearon palabras de búsqueda relacionadas con la investigación. A partir de la información obtenida, se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de un total de 245 artículos publicados en las bases de datos: PubMed, Hinari, SciELO y Medline, mediante el gestor de búsqueda y administrador de referencias EndNote, de ellos, se utilizaron 29 citas seleccionadas para realizar la revisión, 28 de los últimos cinco años. Resultados: Se hace referencia a cuatro de las situaciones transoperatorias más frecuentes en este tipo de fractura. Se mencionan la conminución de la pared medial, como identificar esta situación y su conducta. En relación a las lesiones asociadas, se recomienda primero estabilizar el antebrazo y luego la fractura supracondílea. Para las fracturas inestables en flexión se recomienda la técnica a emplear. Por su parte, la conversión de la reducción cerrada a abierta está justificada en ciertas circunstancias que de forma detallada se describen en el trabajo. Conclusiones: Las fracturas supracondíleas del húmero en el niño son tratadas en su mayoría mediante tratamiento quirúrgico. Durante el transoperatorio se pueden presentar situaciones para las cuales el médico tratante debe estar preparado.
Introduction: Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children are generally treated surgically, during surgery intervention may occur specific situations in this type of patient. Objective: To update and provide information on some of the intraoperative situations in patients with supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Methods: The search and analysis of the information was carried out in a period of 61 days (September 1st to October 31st, 2022) and search words related to the investigation were used. Based on the information obtained, a bibliographic review of a total of 245 articles published in the PubMed, Hinari, SciELO and Medline databases was carried out using the EndNote search manager and reference administrator, of which 29 selected citations were used to carry out the review, 28 of the last five years. Results: Reference is made to four of the most frequent intraoperative situations in this type of fracture. Comminution of the medial wall, how to identify this situation and its behavior are mentioned. In relation to associated injuries, it is recommended to first stabilize the forearm and then the supracondylar fracture. For unstable fractures in flexion, the technique to be used is recommended. For its part, the conversion from closed to open reduction is justified in certain circumstances that are described in the article. Conclusions: Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children are mostly treated by surgical treatment. During the trans-operative period situations may arise for which the treating physician must be prepared.
RÉSUMÉ
Bilateral hip dislocations are among the rarest traumatic incidents. We report a case of a 45-year-old, opium-addicted man with bilateral posterior hip dislocation and bilateral femoral head fractures proximal to the fovea with more comminution on the left side. After an unsuccessful closed reduction attempt, surgical reduction and internal fixation of the left and right femoral heads were performed on admission and 72 hours later. He was readmitted because of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) on the left side after six weeks and left femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) after 14 months. All complications occurred on the left side regardless of the sooner intervention in this side compared with the right side. This may imply that the severity of the initial trauma could be a more important risk factor for AVN rather than other factors in case the reduction is delayed for more than six hours.
RÉSUMÉ
Purpose: Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a common surgical treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of ORIF in patients with different fracture patterns (Vancouver B1 and B2). Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed from inception to August 2022. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the 10 comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the data from the 39 articles to determine a consensus. The outcomes were the incidence of reoperations that included osteosynthesis, irrigation/debridement and revision arthroplasty. Results: The pair-wise meta-analysis showed similar outcomes between two groups; the risk of reoperation (odds ratio [OR]=0.82, confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.55, P=0.542), nonunion (OR=0.49; CI 0.22-1.10, P=0.085) and deep infection (OR=1.89, CI 0.48-7.46, P=0.361). In proportion meta-analysis, pooled prevalence of reoperation was 9% (95% CI, 6-12) in B1 and 8% (95% CI, 2-15) in B2 (heterogeneity between two groups (Q), P=0.772). The pooled prevalence of nonunion was same as of 4% in B1 and B2 (Q, P=0.678), and deep infection was 2% (95% CI, 1-3) in B1 and 4% (95% CI, 2-7) in B2 (Q, P=0.130). Conclusion: ORIF is a feasible treatment for B1 and B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, with acceptable outcomes in terms of, nonunion and infection. The results of this study would help clinicians and provide baseline data for further studies validating PFF.
RÉSUMÉ
Metatarsal fractures are one of the most common injuries after foot trauma. It is debilitating, as the metatarsals are one of the most crucial bones for any weight-bearing movement. This report demonstrates the beneficial outcome of using Kirschner wires (K-wires) in a trauma setting and the complicated healing process. A 56-year-old gentleman was brought into the emergency department after a reinforced cement pipe fell onto the patient's steel-toe boots, striking his left foot immediately proximal to the steel portion of the boot. The patient had sustained displaced comminuted fractures of the left second, third, fourth, and fifth metatarsals with an extensive open wound (Gustilo type II open fracture). Open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) was performed using K-wires to restore and preserve the anatomical and functional integrity of the foot. Following the surgery, the patient developed a hammer toe of the left fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint two months after the ORIF; we performed resection arthroplasty to relieve discomfort and further aid the recovery process. Following the resection arthroplasty, eschar had formed at the surgical site, extending from the lateral aspect of the left foot to the plantar surface, for which we had performed a skin graft after excisional debridement of the necrotic tissue. After one year of close follow-ups with rigorous physical therapy exercises, the patient had a fair recovery process and is now able to ambulate without any assistive devices. As such, using K-wires remains a viable option for reducing misaligned metatarsal fractures and providing fairly good outcomes even in the setting of severe foot trauma.
RÉSUMÉ
This study aimed to compare open and closed treatment for unilateral mandibular condyle neck and base fractures by final three-dimensional (3D) condylar position at 6 months follow-up. 3D position was associated with mandibular functioning and pain. A total of 21 patients received open (n = 11) or closed (n = 10) treatment. 3D positions were assessed on cone-beam computed tomography scans. Volume differences, root mean square, translations, and rotations were obtained related to the pursued anatomical position and compared between treatment groups by the Mann-Whitney U test. The 3D position parameters were associated with the maximum interincisal opening (MIO), mixing ability test (MAT), Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ), and pain based on Spearman correlation coefficients (rs). Translation in the medial-lateral direction was smaller after open treatment (P = 0.014). 3D position was not associated with the MAT; however, worse position was associated with a smaller MIO. A larger pitch rotation was associated with a worse MFIQ (rs = 0.499, P = 0.025). Volume reduction of the affected condyle was associated with more pain (rs = -0.503, P = 0.020). In conclusion, after unilateral condylar fractures, worse 3D position is associated with a smaller mouth opening and worse patient-reported outcomes. This is independent of the chosen treatment, despite a better anatomical reduction after open treatment.
Sujet(s)
Condyle mandibulaire , Fractures mandibulaires , Humains , Condyle mandibulaire/chirurgie , Fractures mandibulaires/imagerie diagnostique , Fractures mandibulaires/chirurgie , Résultat thérapeutique , Mandibule , Douleur , Ostéosynthèse interne/méthodesRÉSUMÉ
Open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) for facial fractures has frequently been associated with the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs). Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is customarily recommended for ORIF. Thus, the comparison of two different antibiotic regimens (i.e., single-dose and prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis) concerning the rate and severity of SSIs in facial fracture patients undergoing ORIF was the main purpose of this study. This retrospective analysis included patients who underwent ORIF for facial fractures. They were distributed into two groups. The single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis group (SDAP) received single-dose perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, whereas the prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis group (PAP) were administered prophylactic antibiosis over a course of 5 days. 122 patients were included in the study. Nine patients in the SDAP group and 15 patients in the PAP group were affected by SSIs; no significant difference in the incidence of SSIs was found (p = 0.218). Moreover, the severity of SSIs did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.982).
Sujet(s)
Antibioprophylaxie , Traumatismes maxillofaciaux , Humains , Infection de plaie opératoire/épidémiologie , Infection de plaie opératoire/prévention et contrôle , Infection de plaie opératoire/traitement médicamenteux , Études rétrospectives , Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Traumatismes maxillofaciaux/chirurgieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Midfacial fractures frequently involve the maxillary sinus, leading to maxillary sinus pathology. We aimed to examine the incidence and contributing factors of maxillary sinus pathology in patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for midfacial fractures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent ORIF for midfacial fractures at our department over the past 10 years. The incidence of maxillary sinus pathology was identified clinically and/or by computed tomography findings. Factors that significantly influenced the groups with and without maxillary sinus pathology were examined. RESULTS: The incidence of maxillary sinus pathology in patients who underwent ORIF for midfacial fractures was found to be 11.27%, with sinusitis being the most common pathology. Maxillary sinus pathology was significantly associated with the presence of a blowout fracture involving both the medial and the inferior orbital walls. Factors such as sex, age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, inflammatory disease, follow-up period, use of absorbable plates, and use of titanium plates did not have a significant impact on the development of maxillary sinus pathology. CONCLUSION: The incidence of maxillary sinus pathology in patients who underwent ORIF for midfacial fractures was relatively low, and in most cases, it resolved without the need for specific treatment. Consequently, there may not be a significant need for concern regarding postoperative maxillary sinus pathology.
RÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Intraoperative stabilisation of bony fragments with maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF) is an essential step in the surgical treatment of mandibular fractures that are treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The MMF can be performed with or without wire-based methods, rigid or manual MMF, respectively. The aim of this study was to compare the use of manual versus rigid MMF, in terms of occlusal outcomes and infective complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multi-centric prospective study involved 12 European maxillofacial centres and included adult patients (age ≥16 years) with mandibular fractures treated with ORIF. The following data were collected: age, gender, pre-trauma dental status (dentate or partially dentate), cause of injury, fracture site, associated facial fractures, surgical approach, modality of intraoperative MMF (manual or rigid), outcome (minor/major malocclusions and infective complications) and revision surgeries. The main outcome was malocclusion at 6 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Between May 1, 2021 and April 30, 2022, 319 patients-257 males and 62 females (median age, 28 years)-with mandibular fractures (185 single, 116 double and 18 triple fractures) were hospitalised and treated with ORIF. Intraoperative MMF was performed manually on 112 (35%) patients and with rigid MMF on 207 (65%) patients. The study variables did not differ significantly between the two groups, except for age. Minor occlusion disturbances were observed in 4 (3.6%) patients in the manual MMF group and in 10 (4.8%) patients in the rigid MMF group (p > .05). In the rigid MMF group, only one case of major malocclusion required a revision surgery. Infective complications involved 3.6% and 5.8% of patients in the manual and rigid MMF group, respectively (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative MMF was performed manually in nearly one third of the patients, with wide variability among the centres and no difference observed in terms of number, site and displacement of fractures. No significant difference was found in terms of postoperative malocclusion among patients treated with manual or rigid MMF. This suggests that both techniques were equally effective in providing intraoperative MMF.
Sujet(s)
Malocclusion dentaire , Fractures mandibulaires , Adulte , Mâle , Femelle , Humains , Adolescent , Fractures mandibulaires/étiologie , Études prospectives , Ostéosynthèse interne/méthodes , Mandibule/chirurgie , Résultat thérapeutique , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Reverse oblique (RO) and transverse intertrochanteric fracture patterns constitute a challenge for the operating surgeon. Currently, no gold standard fixation method exists. This study aimed to retrospectively compare proximal femoral nail (PFN) to dynamic condylar screw (DCS) plating in the treatment of RO and transverse intertrochanteric fractures. METHODS: A total of 61 patients fixated by PFN or DCS were included. Of these, 36 were treated with PFN (21 females and 15 males; mean age: 65.52 years), and 25 were treated with DCS (12 females and 13 males; mean age: 59.36 years). The mean follow-up time was 33.8 and 42.6 months (range: 24-108). Radiological evaluation included the quality of fracture reduction, neck-shaft angle change, posteromedial support presence, and bone union time. Complications such as mechanical failure, nonunion, and infection were noted. RESULTS: The only significant differences between the fixation methods were the superiority of DCS over PFN in earlier fracture union time (mean values: 8.9 versus 14.1 weeks) and the superiority (p=0.007) of PFN in shorter hospital stay (3.4 days versus 5.1 days). No significant difference was observed in radiological parameters. While similar mechanical complication rates were found, a significantly higher nonunion rate was detected with the DCS. CONCLUSION: The most crucial disadvantage of DCS was the high rate of nonunion. Closed fracture reduction in PFN seems to be the most critical parameter to prevent severe complications. The open reduction using DCS showed no advantages over closed reduction and PFN fixation in providing a more anatomical alignment in AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) 31-A3 fractures. However, we recommend PFN application in this type of fracture, since nonunion is more common in DCS.
RÉSUMÉ
Sternal fractures are common following blunt traumatic injury. Most sternal fractures can be managed successfully nonoperatively; however, surgical fixation should be considered in certain scenarios. Specifically, surgery may be indicated in cases of severe pain, respiratory failure or dependency on mechanical ventilation, cosmetic deformity, malunion, disunion, and compression of the heart. A variety of surgical approaches to sternal fracture fixation have been documented (steel wire, suture materials, a seven-hole aluminum plate, an eight-holed Sternolock X plate, sternum-osteosynthesis plate, t-shaped plate); however, few techniques have been discussed for the initial reduction of the sternal fracture prior to fixation. In this paper, we describe a novel surgical technique used to reduce sternal fractures and approximate the edges of the sternum using a compression/distraction device.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) represent the most common pediatric elbow fracture, constituting approximately 12-17% of all pediatric fractures. The vast majority of operative supracondylar humerus fractures are treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP); however, the estimated rate of SCHFs requiring open reduction is approximately 12.7%. AIM: This study aims to analyze the likelihood of open reduction in pediatric extension-type SCHFs and to reaffirm the traditional teaching of reduction techniques described by Smith and Rang. METHODS: A single-surgeon retrospective analysis of 56 operative pediatric SCH cases (51 extension-type, 6 flexion-type) who underwent either CRPP or open reduction over a 16-year period was performed. All cases were performed using the aforementioned reduction technique. The Modified Gartland's classification was utilized in the analysis of extension-type SCHF radiographs. RESULTS: Gartland IIA fractures constituted 38% of SCHFs, 9% of Gartland IIB, 43% of Gartland III, and 7% of flexion-type. The rate of open reduction in SCHFs was 1.8% (1 out of 56 cases), performed in a flexion-type injury. All extension-type fractures were successfully managed with either CRPP or manipulation and casting alone. Of the cases requiring CRPP, 45% were divergent lateral wires, and 55% were crossed wires. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, a 1.8% rate of open reduction was indicated in flexion-type SCH fractures. All 52 cases of extension-type SCHFs were successfully managed with closed reduction with or without percutaneous pinning. Successful closed reduction using the concept of intact periosteal hinge to aid and maintain reduction is crucial.
Sujet(s)
Fractures de l'humérus , Chirurgiens , Enfant , Humains , Études rétrospectives , Ostéosynthèse interne/méthodes , Résultat thérapeutique , Fractures de l'humérus/chirurgieRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Oral functioning and rehabilitation in patients after condylar trauma can be measured by objective functional outcomes and patient-reported outcomes. The similarities or differences between these outcomes may contribute to the decision if open treatment (OT) or closed treatment (CT) will obtain the most advantageous results. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare OT versus CT for unilateral condylar mandibular neck or base fractures in a two-centre controlled clinical trial by objective functional outcomes and patient-reported outcomes measured at 6 weeks and 6 months follow-up. Additionally, these outcomes were compared within each group. METHODS: Patients were enrolled between January 2017 and November 2019. In one centre, patients received OT by extra-oral open reduction and internal fixation. In another centre, patients received CT by maxillomandibular fixation. Objective measurements included the mixing ability test (MAT) and mandibular active range of motion (ROM). Patient-reported outcomes included the mandibular function impairment questionnaire (MFIQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. Independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to determine differences between the treatment groups at 6 weeks and 6 months follow-up. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to determine differences within each group. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled. No differences were found between the groups treated with OT or CT for MAT, ROM, MFIQ and VAS. Both groups showed functional improvement. CONCLUSION: Good objective functional outcomes and patient-reported outcomes were achieved with both OT and CT in patients with unilateral condylar mandibular neck or base fractures.
Sujet(s)
Fractures mandibulaires , Humains , Ostéosynthèse interne/méthodes , Mandibule , Condyle mandibulaire , Fractures mandibulaires/imagerie diagnostique , Fractures mandibulaires/chirurgie , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of "ladder reduction method" in the treatment of iliac fracture combined anterior dislocation of sacroiliac joint.Methods:The retrospective analysis was performed on 10 cases of iliac fracture combined anterior sacroiliac joint dislocation admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University from February 2010 to January 2022, among which 5 cases were males and 5 cases were females, aged ranging from 22 to 52 years, with an average age of 38.8 years. All patients were injured in car accidents including 5 cases of C1.2, 3 cases of C2, and 2 cases of C3 fractures according to Tile classification. All patients were treated with the "ladder reduction method" with plate and screw fixation. In the first step, 1-2 Schanz pins were inserted into the iliac crest to control the ilium, and the Schanz pins were appropriately pulled laterally; in the second step, the periosteal stripper was used to pry the reduction between the sacrum and ilium; in the third step, for the patients who still could not be reduced, a 2.5 mm diameter Kirschner wire was placed on the sacrum close to the iliac crest, and a periosteal stripper was inserted between the sacrum and iliac crest, with its tip against the Kirkner wire, and the iliac crest as the fulcrum for pry pulling to separate the two. In the fourth step, the pry was maintained, and then another 2.5 mm diameter Kirschner wire was placed on the sacrum close to the internal margin of the iliac bone. The periosteal stripper was continued to pry between the sacrum and the iliac bone, and the operation was repeated. At the same time, the anterior dislocation of the sacroiliac joint was reduced with traction of the lower limb. Postoperatively, the quality of reduction was evaluated by the Matta score, and the degree of functional recovery after pelvic fracture was evaluated by the Majeed score.Results:Four patients completed the reduction through the first and second steps, and 6 cases of refractory sacroiliac joint anterior dislocation were successfully reduced through the first to fourth steps. The fracture reduction time of 6 patients with refractory anterior sacroiliac joint dislocation was 39.67±3.09 min (range, 35-44 min), with intraoperative blood loss of 300.00±141.42 ml (range, 150-600 ml); in the other 4 cases, the fracture reduction time was 36.75±4.38 min (range, 30-42 min), and the intraoperative blood loss was 225.00±44.30 ml (range, 200-300 ml). All 10 patients were followed up for 12.9±3.7 months (range, 9-20 months). The anterior and posterior pelvic ring fractures were healed in all patients, and the fracture healing time was 12.77±1.62 weeks (range, 10.71-15.28 weeks). At the last follow-up, Matta evaluation was excellent in 5 cases, good in 1 case, and excellent in the other 4 cases. The Majeed scores of 6 cases were 86.50±6.08 points (range, 74-92 points), of which 5 cases were excellent and 1 case was good. The other 4 cases were 81.5±9.39 scores (range, 71-94), of which 2 were excellent and 2 were good.Conclusion:The "ladder reduction method" is a safe, effective and easy-to-operate method for the treatment of iliac fracture combined anterior dislocation of the sacroiliac joint, especially for refractory anterior dislocation of the sacroiliac joint, which can still obtain satisfactory curative effects.