RÉSUMÉ
Trauma is one of the leading causes of disability and mortality in working-age population. Abdominal injuries comprise 20-30% of traumas. Uncontrolled bleeding is the main cause of death in 30-40% of patients. Among abdominal organs, spleen is most often damaged due to fragile structure and subcostal localization. In the last two decades, therapeutic management has become preferable in patients with abdominal trauma and stable hemodynamic parameters. In addition to clinical examination, standard laboratory tests and ultrasound, as well as contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen should be included in diagnostic algorithm to identify all traumatic injuries and assess severity of abdominal damage. Development of interventional radiological technologies improved preservation of damaged organs. Endovascular embolization can be performed selectively according to indications (leakage, false aneurysm, arteriovenous anastomosis) and considered for severe damage to the liver and spleen, hemoperitoneum or severe polytrauma. Embolization is essential in complex treatment of traumatic vascular injuries of parenchymal abdominal organs. We reviewed modern principles and methods of intra-arterial embolization for the treatment of patients with traumatic injuries of the liver and spleen.
Sujet(s)
Traumatismes de l'abdomen , Embolisation thérapeutique , Procédures endovasculaires , Rate , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Traumatismes de l'abdomen/thérapie , Traumatismes de l'abdomen/diagnostic , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Embolisation thérapeutique/méthodes , Rate/traumatismes , Rate/vascularisation , Procédures endovasculaires/méthodes , Foie/traumatismes , Foie/vascularisation , Foie/imagerie diagnostiqueRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAI) once had mortality rates up to 32%, but the advent of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has significantly improved outcomes. However, concerns persist regarding long-term devicerelated complications, device integrity in aging aortas, and the criteria for selecting patients for endovascular repair. We aimed to assess BTAI treatment strategies based on injury grade and their associated outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of MedLine and Scopus databases was conducted to identify original articles published after 2013, which provided information on injury characteristics, outcomes, secondary effects, and reinterventions following BTAI. We classified aortic injuries following the SVS Clinical Practice Guidelines. RESULTS: We included 28 studies involving 1888 BTAI patients, including 5 prospective studies. Most patients were under 45 years old (86.4%), and grade III injuries were the most common (901 patients), followed by grades I and II (307 and 291 patients, respectively). TEVAR was performed in 1458 patients, mainly with grade III and IV injuries (1040 patients). Approximately half of the grade I injuries (153 of 307) were treated with TEVAR. Thirty-day mortality rate was 11.2%, primarily due to associated injuries. Aortic-related deaths were reported in 21 studies, with an overall rate of 2.2%, but none occurred beyond the first 30 days. Partial or complete coverage of the left subclavian artery was performed in 522 patients, with 27.9% requiring immediate or delayed revascularization. Aortic reintervention rates were relatively low (3.9%). CONCLUSION: TEVAR effectively treats BTAI grades III and IV, with potential benefit for some grade II injuries with more aggressive early intervention. Despite SVS guidelines suggesting conservative management for grade I injuries, there is a substantial rate of intervention with positive outcomes and low mortality. Long-term follow-up data, extending up to almost 20 years, reveal the durability of grafts, aortic remodeling, and minimal reintervention and complications.
Sujet(s)
Aorte thoracique , Procédures endovasculaires , Lésions du système vasculaire , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Plaies non pénétrantes/chirurgie , Plaies non pénétrantes/mortalité , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Aorte thoracique/traumatismes , Aorte thoracique/chirurgie , Procédures endovasculaires/méthodes , Lésions du système vasculaire/chirurgie , Lésions du système vasculaire/mortalité , Résultat thérapeutique , Adulte , Blessures du thorax/chirurgie , Blessures du thorax/mortalité , Blessures du thorax/thérapieRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: The assessment of hemodynamic status in polytrauma patients is an important principle of the primary survey of trauma patients, and screening for ongoing hemorrhage and assessing the efficacy of resuscitation is vital in avoiding preventable death and significant morbidity in these patients. Invasive procedures may lead to various complications and the IVC ultrasound measurements are increasingly recognized as a potential noninvasive replacement or a source of adjunct information. AIMOF THIS STUDY: The study aimed to determine if repeated ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava (diameter, collapsibility (IVC- CI) in major trauma patients presenting with collapsible IVC before resuscitation and after the first hour of resuscitation will predict total intravenous fluid requirements at first 24 h. PATIENTS & METHODS: The current study was conducted on 120 patients presented to the emergency department with Major blunt trauma (having significant injury to two or more ISS body regions or an ISS greater than 15). The patients(cases) group (shocked group) (60) patients with signs of shock such as decreased blood pressure < 90/60 mmHg or a more than 30% decrease from the baseline systolic pressure, heart rate > 100 b/m, cold, clammy skin, capillary refill > 2 s and their shock index above0.9. The control group (non-shocked group) (60) patients with normal blood pressure and heart rate, no other signs of shock (normal capillary refill, warm skin), and (shock index ≤ 0.9). Patients were evaluated at time 0 (baseline), 1 h after resucitation, and 24 h after 1st hour for:(blood pressure, pulse, RR, SO2, capillary refill time, MABP, IVCci, IVCmax, IVCmin). RESULTS: Among 120 Major blunt trauma patients, 98 males (81.7%) and 22 females (18.3%) were included in this analysis; hypovolemic shocked patients (60 patients) were divided into two main groups according to IVC diameter after the first hour of resuscitation; IVC repleted were 32 patients (53.3%) while 28 patients (46.7%) were IVC non-repleted. In our study population, there were statistically significant differences between repleted and non-repleted IVC cases regarding IVCD, DIVC min, IVCCI (on arrival) (after 1 h) (after 24 h of 1st hour of resuscitation) ( p-value < 0.05) and DIVC Max (on arrival) (after 1 h) (p-value < 0.001). There is no statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.075) between repleted and non-repleted cases regarding DIVC Max (after 24 h).In our study, we found that IVCci0 at a cut-off point > 38.5 has a sensitivity of 80.0% and Specificity of 85.71% with AUC 0.971 and a good 95% CI (0.938 - 1.0), which means that IVCci of 38.6% or more can indicate fluid responsiveness. We also found that IVCci 1 h (after fluid resuscitation) at cut-off point > 28.6 has a sensitivity of 80.0% and Specificity of 75% with AUC 0.886 and good 95% CI (0.803 - 0.968), which means that IVCci of 28.5% or less can indicate fluid unresponsiveness after 1st hour of resuscitation. We found no statistically significant difference between repleted and non-repleted cases regarding fluid requirement and amount of blood transfusion at 1st hour of resuscitation (p-value = 0.104). CONCLUSION: Repeated bedside ultrasonography of IVCD, and IVCci before and after the first hour of resuscitation could be an excellent reliable invasive tool that can be used in estimating the First 24 h of fluid requirement in Major blunt trauma patients and assessment of fluid status.
Sujet(s)
Service hospitalier d'urgences , Traitement par apport liquidien , Réanimation , Échographie , Veine cave inférieure , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Veine cave inférieure/imagerie diagnostique , Femelle , Mâle , Adulte , Plaies non pénétrantes/imagerie diagnostique , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Traitement par apport liquidien/méthodes , Réanimation/méthodes , Adulte d'âge moyen , Hôpitaux universitaires , Jeune adulte , Études prospectives , IranRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND A traumatic coronary artery dissection is a rare but severe complication of chest trauma that can result in blockage of the coronary artery. The clinical symptoms can vary considerably, from asymptomatic arrhythmia to acute myocardial infarction and sudden death. This report describes a young man with coronary artery dissection following blunt chest trauma from a motorcycle accident presenting with ventricular fibrillation due to acute myocardial infarction, which was treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. CASE REPORT We present a 21-year-old man with chest contusion from a motorcycle accident who experienced sudden collapse due to ventricular fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction. The patient was resuscitated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 12-lead electrocardiogram showed sinus tachycardia with a hyperacute T-wave and ST elevation in leads V2-V6. Percutaneous coronary intervention revealed dissection from the ostial to proximal portion of the left anterior descending artery, and traumatic coronary artery dissection was confirmed. He was successfully treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, in which a drug-eluting stent was inserted to enhance blood flow in the left anterior descending artery, resulting in TIMI 2 flow restoration. After 16 days of intensive care, he was discharged and was well at a 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This report describes a case with the rare association between blunt chest trauma and coronary artery dissection and highlights that coronary artery dissection can result in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can protect the patient's circulation for coronary angioplasty. Therefore, early detection and intensive resuscitation can prevent disastrous outcomes.
Sujet(s)
Accidents de la route , Motocyclettes , Infarctus du myocarde , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Mâle , Infarctus du myocarde/thérapie , Jeune adulte , Plaies non pénétrantes/complications , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Oxygénation extracorporelle sur oxygénateur à membrane , Vaisseaux coronaires/traumatismes , Intervention coronarienne percutanée , Électrocardiographie , Blessures du thorax/complications , /complications , /thérapie , Endoprothèses à élution de substances , Anévrysme coronarien/thérapie , Anévrysme coronarien/étiologie , Angioplastie coronaire par ballonnetRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: When an injured patient arrives in the Emergency Department (ED), timely and appropriate care is crucial. Shock Index Pediatric Age-Adjusted (SIPA) has been shown to accurately identify pediatric patients in need of emergency interventions. However, no study has evaluated SIPA against age-adjusted tachycardia (AT). This study aims to compare SIPA with AT in predicting outcomes such as mortality, severe injury, and the need for emergent intervention in pediatric trauma patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patient data abstracted from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files (TQIP PUFs) for years 2013-2020. Patients aged 4-16 with blunt mechanism of injury and injury severity score (ISS) > 15 were included. 36,517 children met this criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, overtriage, and undertriage rates were calculated to compare the effectiveness of AT and elevated SIPA as predictors of severe injuries and need for emergent intervention. Emergent interventions included craniotomy, endotracheal intubation, thoracotomy, laparotomy, or chest tube placement within 24 h of arrival. RESULTS: AT classified 59% of patients as "high risk," while elevated SIPA identified 26%. Compared to AT patients, a greater proportion of patients with elevated SIPA required a blood transfusion within 24 h (22% vs. 12%, respectively; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher for the elevated SIPA group than AT (10% vs. 5%, respectively; p < 0.001) as well as the need for emergent operative interventions (43% vs. 32% respectively; p < 0.001). Grade 3 or higher liver/spleen lacerations requiring blood transfusion were also more common among elevated SIPA patients than AT patients (8% vs. 4%, respectively; p < 0.001). AT demonstrated greater sensitivity but lower specificity compared to SIPA across all outcomes. AT showed improved overtriage and undertriage rates compared to SIPA, but this is attributed to identifying a large proportion of the sample as "high risk." CONCLUSIONS: AT outperforms SIPA in sensitivity for mortality, injury severity and emergent interventions in pediatric trauma patients while the specificity of SIPA is high across these outcomes.
Sujet(s)
Service hospitalier d'urgences , Score de gravité des lésions traumatiques , Choc , Tachycardie , Humains , Enfant , Mâle , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Adolescent , Études transversales , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Tachycardie/diagnostic , Choc/mortalité , Choc/diagnostic , Triage/méthodes , Plaies et blessures/mortalité , Plaies et blessures/complications , Plaies et blessures/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/mortalité , Plaies non pénétrantes/complications , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/diagnosticRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is gaining popularity for the treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF). However, limited evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of HFNC for hypoxemic ARF in patients with blunt chest trauma (BCT). METHODS: This retrospective analysis focused on BCT patients with mild-moderate hypoxemic ARF who were treated with either HFNC or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the emergency medicine department from January 2021 to December 2022. The primary endpoint was treatment failure, defined as either invasive ventilation, or a switch to the other study treatment (NIV for patients in the NFNC group, and vice-versa). RESULTS: A total of 157 patients with BCT (72 in the HFNC group and 85 in the NIV group) were included in this study. The treatment failure rate in the HFNC group was 11.1% and 16.5% in the NIV group - risk difference of 5.36% (95% CI, -5.94-16.10%; P = 0.366). The most common cause of failure in the HFNC group was aggravation of respiratory distress. While in the NIV group, the most common reason for failure was treatment intolerance. Treatment intolerance in the HFNC group was significantly lower than that in the NIV group (1.4% vs 9.4%, 95% CI 0.40-16.18; P = 0.039). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that chronic respiratory disease, abbreviated injury scale score (chest) (≥3), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (≥15), partial arterial oxygen tension /fraction of inspired oxygen (≤200) at 1 h of treatment and respiratory rate (≥32 /min) at 1 h of treatment were risk factors associated with HFNC failure. CONCLUSION: In BCT patients with mild-moderate hypoxemic ARF, the usage of HFNC did not lead to higher rate of treatment failure when compared to NIV. HFNC was found to offer better comfort and tolerance than NIV, suggesting it may be a promising new respiratory support therapy for BCT patients with mild-moderate ARF.
Sujet(s)
Canule , Ventilation non effractive , Oxygénothérapie , Insuffisance respiratoire , Blessures du thorax , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Oxygénothérapie/méthodes , Blessures du thorax/complications , Blessures du thorax/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/complications , Adulte d'âge moyen , Ventilation non effractive/méthodes , Adulte , Insuffisance respiratoire/thérapie , Échec thérapeutique , Sujet âgé , /thérapieRÉSUMÉ
RATIONALE: Subclavian artery (SCA) injuries, though rare, carry significant morbidity and mortality risks due to significant blood loss causing hypovolemic shock. Early diagnosis and adequate treatment are crucial to minimize bleeding and associated morbidity. Recent advances in endovascular techniques offer faster and more accurate treatment options compared to traditional open surgical repair. This study demonstrates the efficacy of endovascular treatment in 2 cases of SCA injury and reviews its indications, limitations, and precautions. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 69-year-old man presented with a penetrating SCA injury from a steel bar, and a 38-year-old woman presented with a blunt SCA injury caused by a fall. Both patients were hemodynamically unstable upon presentation. DIAGNOSES: Both patients were diagnosed with SCA injuries. The man had a penetrating injury, while the woman had a blunt injury, both resulting in hemodynamic instability and significant risk of hypovolemic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Endovascular techniques, including the use of covered stent grafts, were employed to manage the injuries. These techniques allowed for rapid and efficient treatment, reducing the need for open surgical intervention. OUTCOMES: Both patients were successfully treated using endovascular methods and were discharged without any complications. The endovascular approach minimized blood loss, transfusion needs, and hospital stay. LESSONS: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of endovascular techniques in rapidly diagnosing, bridging, and definitively treating SCA injuries, suggesting their use as a first-line therapy.
Sujet(s)
Procédures endovasculaires , Artère subclavière , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Artère subclavière/traumatismes , Artère subclavière/chirurgie , Procédures endovasculaires/méthodes , Sujet âgé , Femelle , Mâle , Adulte , Plaies non pénétrantes/complications , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Plaies pénétrantes/complications , Plaies pénétrantes/chirurgie , Lésions du système vasculaire/chirurgie , Lésions du système vasculaire/diagnostic , Lésions du système vasculaire/complications , EndoprothèsesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Mortality reviews examine US military fatalities resulting from traumatic injuries during combat operations. These reviews are essential to the evolution of the military trauma system to improve individual, unit, and system-level trauma care delivery and inform trauma system protocols and guidelines. This study identifies specific prehospital and hospital interventions with the potential to provide survival benefits. METHODS: US Special Operations Command fatalities with battle injuries deemed potentially survivable (2001-2021) were extracted from previous mortality reviews. A military trauma review panel consisting of trauma surgeons, forensic pathologists, and prehospital and emergency medicine specialists conducted a methodical review to identify prehospital, hospital, and resuscitation interventions (e.g., laparotomy, blood transfusion) with the potential to have provided a survival benefit. RESULTS: Of 388 US Special Operations Command battle-injured fatalities, 100 were deemed potentially survivable. Of these (median age, 29 years; all male), 76.0% were injured in Afghanistan, and 75% died prehospital. Gunshot wounds were in 62.0%, followed by blast injury (37%), and blunt force injury (1.0%). Most had a Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale severity classified as 4 (severe) (55.0%) and 5 (critical) (41.0%). The panel recommended 433 interventions (prehospital, 188; hospital, 315). The most recommended prehospital intervention was blood transfusion (95%), followed by finger/tube thoracostomy (47%). The most common hospital recommendations were thoracotomy and definitive vascular repair. Whole blood transfusion was assessed for each fatality: 74% would have required ≥10 U of blood, 20% would have required 5 to 10 U, 1% would have required 1 to 4 U, and 5% would not have required blood products to impact survival. Five may have benefited from a prehospital laparotomy. CONCLUSION: This study systematically identified capabilities needed to provide a survival benefit and examined interventions needed to inform trauma system efforts along the continuum of care. The determination was that blood transfusion and massive transfusion shortly after traumatic injury would impact survival the most. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level V.
Sujet(s)
Transfusion sanguine , Humains , Mâle , Adulte , États-Unis/épidémiologie , Transfusion sanguine/normes , Transfusion sanguine/statistiques et données numériques , Transfusion sanguine/méthodes , Consensus , Médecine militaire/normes , Médecine militaire/méthodes , Services des urgences médicales/normes , Plaies et blessures/thérapie , Plaies et blessures/mortalité , Personnel militaire , Réanimation/méthodes , Réanimation/normes , Score de gravité des lésions traumatiques , Plaies par arme à feu/thérapie , Plaies par arme à feu/mortalité , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/mortalité , Plaies non pénétrantes/diagnostic , Traumatismes par explosion/thérapie , Traumatismes par explosion/mortalité , Blessures de guerre/thérapie , Blessures de guerre/mortalitéRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Non-operative management is the standard of care for pediatric blunt splenic injury. The American Pediatric Surgical Association recommends intensive care unit monitoring only for grade IV/V blunt splenic injury; however, variation remains regarding this practice. We hypothesized that pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries admitted to a non-intensive care unit setting would have similar outcomes to those admitted to the intensive care unit. METHODS: The 2017 to 2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for blunt pediatric trauma patients (≤16 years) with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries. Patients with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or heart rate >90 were excluded. Pediatric trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit were compared to non-intensive care unit admissions. The primary outcome was splenectomy. Bivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 461 pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries, 186 (40.3%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. Intensive care unit patients were older than their non-intensive care unit counterparts (15 vs 14 years, P = .03). Intensive care unit and non-intensive care unit patients had a similar rate of splenectomy (0.5% vs 0.7%, P = .80) and time to surgery (19.7 vs 19.8 hours, P = .98). Patients admitted to the intensive care unit had a longer length of stay (4 vs 3 days, P < .001). There were no significant complications or deaths in either group. CONCLUSION: This national analysis demonstrated that hemodynamically stable pediatric trauma patients with near-isolated grade III blunt splenic injuries admitted to the floor or intensive care unit had a similar rate of splenectomy without complications or deaths. This aligns with American Pediatric Surgical Association recommendations that pediatric trauma patients with grade III blunt splenic injuries be managed in non-intensive care unit settings. Widespread adoption is warranted and should lead to decreased healthcare expenditures.
Sujet(s)
Score de gravité des lésions traumatiques , Unités de soins intensifs , Rate , Splénectomie , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/diagnostic , Plaies non pénétrantes/chirurgie , Plaies non pénétrantes/mortalité , Rate/traumatismes , Adolescent , Mâle , Femelle , Enfant , Splénectomie/statistiques et données numériques , Études rétrospectives , Unités de soins intensifs/statistiques et données numériques , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Durée du séjour/statistiques et données numériques , Traumatismes de l'abdomen/chirurgie , Traumatismes de l'abdomen/thérapie , Traumatismes de l'abdomen/diagnostic , Traumatismes de l'abdomen/mortalitéRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenia has been shown to portend worse outcomes in injured patients; however, little is known about the impact of thoracic muscle wasting on outcomes of patients with chest wall injury. We hypothesized that reduced pectoralis muscle mass is associated with poor outcomes in patients with severe blunt chest wall injury. METHODS: All patients admitted to the intensive care unit between 2014 and 2019 with blunt chest wall injury requiring mechanical ventilation were retrospectively identified. Blunt chest wall injury was defined as the presence of one or more rib fractures as a result of blunt injury mechanism. Exclusion criteria included lack of admission computed tomography imaging, penetrating trauma, <18 y of age, and primary neurologic injury. Thoracic musculature was assessed by measuring pectoralis muscle cross-sectional area (cm2) that was obtained at the fourth thoracic vertebral level using Slice-O-Matic software. The area was then divided by the patient height in meters2 to calculate pectoralis muscle index (PMI) (cm2/m2). Patients were divided into two groups, 1) the lowest gender-specific quartile of PMI and 2) second-fourth gender-specific PMI quartiles for comparative analysis. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria with a median (interquartile range) age 48 y (34-60), body mass index of 30.1 kg/m2 (24.9-34.6), and rib score of 3.0 (2.0-4.0). Seventy-five percent of patients (116/153) were male. Fourteen patients (8%) had prior history of chronic lung disease. Median (IQR) intensive care unit length-of-stay and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) was 18.0 d (13.0-25.0) and 15.0 d (10.0-21.0), respectively. Seventy-three patients (48%) underwent tracheostomy and nine patients (6%) expired during hospitalization. On multivariate linear regression, reduced pectoralis muscle mass was associated with increased MV duration when adjusting for rib score and injury severity score (ß 5.98, 95% confidence interval 1.28-10.68, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced pectoralis muscle mass is associated with increased duration of MV in patients with severe blunt chest wall injury. Knowledge of this can help guide future research and risk stratification of critically ill chest wall injury patients.
Sujet(s)
Muscles pectoraux , Ventilation artificielle , Blessures du thorax , Paroi thoracique , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Muscles pectoraux/traumatismes , Muscles pectoraux/imagerie diagnostique , Plaies non pénétrantes/complications , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/diagnostic , Études rétrospectives , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Blessures du thorax/complications , Blessures du thorax/diagnostic , Blessures du thorax/thérapie , Paroi thoracique/imagerie diagnostique , Paroi thoracique/traumatismes , Ventilation artificielle/statistiques et données numériques , Sarcopénie/diagnostic , Sarcopénie/étiologie , Durée du séjour/statistiques et données numériques , Tomodensitométrie , Fractures de côte/diagnostic , Fractures de côte/complications , Sujet âgé , Unités de soins intensifs/statistiques et données numériquesRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare the outcomes of splenic artery embolization (SAE) versus splenectomy in adult trauma patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2021) compared SAE versus splenectomy in adults with blunt high-grade splenic injuries (grade ≥ IV). Patients were stratified first by hemodynamic status then splenic injury grade. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and transfusion requirements at four and 24 h from arrival. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred nine hemodynamically stable patients were analyzed, with 2975 (95.7%) undergoing splenectomy and 134 (4.3%) with SAE. One thousand eight hundred sixty five patients had grade IV splenic injuries, and 1244 had grade V. Patients managed with SAE had 72% lower odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.28; P = 0.002), significantly shorter ICU-LOS (7 versus 9 d, 95%, P = 0.028), and received a mean of 1606 mL less packed red blood cells at four h compared to those undergoing splenectomy. Patients with grade IV or V injuries both had significantly lower odds of mortality (IV: OR 0.153, P < 0.001; V: OR 0.365, P = 0.041) and were given less packed red blood cells within four h when treated with SAE (2056 mL versus 405 mL, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SAE may be a safer and more effective management approach for hemodynamically stable adult trauma patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries, as demonstrated by its association with significantly lower rates of in-hospital mortality, shorter ICU-LOS, and lower transfusion requirements compared to splenectomy.
Sujet(s)
Embolisation thérapeutique , Mortalité hospitalière , Rate , Splénectomie , Artère splénique , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/mortalité , Plaies non pénétrantes/chirurgie , Plaies non pénétrantes/diagnostic , Embolisation thérapeutique/statistiques et données numériques , Embolisation thérapeutique/méthodes , Études rétrospectives , Femelle , Mâle , Splénectomie/statistiques et données numériques , Splénectomie/méthodes , Splénectomie/mortalité , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Rate/traumatismes , Rate/chirurgie , Rate/vascularisation , Artère splénique/chirurgie , Résultat thérapeutique , Durée du séjour/statistiques et données numériques , Hémodynamique , Score de gravité des lésions traumatiques , Jeune adulte , Transfusion sanguine/statistiques et données numériquesRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) is well accepted in appropriate patients. Splenic artery embolization (SAE) in higher-grade injuries likely plays an important role in increasing the success of NOM. We previously implemented a protocol requiring referral of all BSI grades III-V undergoing NOM for SAE. It is unknown the risk of complications as well as longitudinal outcomes. We aimed to examine the splenic salvage rate and safety profile of the protocol. We hypothesized the splenic salvage rate would be high and complications would be low. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at our Level 1 trauma center over a 9-year period. Injury characteristics and outcomes in patients sustaining BSI grades III-V were collected. Outcomes were compared for NOM on protocol (SAE) and off protocol (no angiography or angiography but no embolization). Complications for angiographies were examined. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and February 2019, 570 patients had grade III-V BSI. NOM was attempted in 359 (63 %) with overall salvage rate of 91 % (328). Of these, 305 were on protocol while 54 were off protocol (41 no angiography and 13 angiography but no SAE). During the study period, for every grade of injury a pattern was seen of a higher salvage rate in the on-protocol group when compared to the off-protocol group (Grade III, 97 %(181/187) vs. 89 %(32/36), Grade IV, 91 %(98/108) vs. 69 %(9/13) and Grade V, 80 %(8/10 vs. 0 %(0/5). The overall salvage rate was 94 %(287) on protocol vs. 76 %(41) off protocol (p < 0.001, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). Complications occurred in only 8 of the 318 who underwent angiography (2 %). These included 5 access complications and 3 abscesses. CONCLUSION: The use of a protocol requiring routine splenic artery embolization for all high-grade spleen injuries slated for non-operative management is safe with a very low complication rate. NOM with splenic angioembolization failure rate is improved as compared to non-SAE patients' at all higher grades of injury. Thus, SAE for all hemodynamically stable patients of all high-grade types should be considered as a primary form of therapy for such injuries.
Sujet(s)
Embolisation thérapeutique , Rate , Centres de traumatologie , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/imagerie diagnostique , Études rétrospectives , Embolisation thérapeutique/méthodes , Mâle , Rate/traumatismes , Rate/imagerie diagnostique , Femelle , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Résultat thérapeutique , Angiographie , Radiologie interventionnelle , Score de gravité des lésions traumatiques , Artère splénique/traumatismes , Artère splénique/imagerie diagnostique , Traumatismes de l'abdomen/thérapie , Traumatismes de l'abdomen/imagerie diagnostique , Thérapie de rattrapageRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Trauma primarily affects the economically active population, causing social and economic impact. The non-operative management of solid organ injuries aims to preserve organ function, reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with surgical interventions. The aim of study was to demonstrate the epidemiological profile of patients undergoing non-operative management in a trauma hospital and to evaluate factors associated with mortality in these patients. METHODS: This is a historical cohort of patients undergoing non-operative management for solid organ injuries at a Brazilian trauma reference hospital between 2018 and 2022. Included were patients with blunt and penetrating trauma, analyzing epidemiological characteristics, blood transfusion, and association with the need for surgical intervention. RESULTS: A total of 365 patients were included in the study. Three hundred and forty-three patients were discharged (93.97%), and the success rate of non-operative treatment was 84.6%. There was an association between mortality and the following associated injuries: hemothorax, sternal fracture, aortic dissection, and traumatic brain injury. There was an association between the need for transfusion and surgical intervention. Thirty-eight patients required some form of surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: The profile of patients undergoing non-operative treatment consists of young men who are victims of blunt trauma. Non-operative treatment is safe and has a high success rate.
Sujet(s)
Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte , Brésil/épidémiologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Jeune adulte , Plaies non pénétrantes/mortalité , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/épidémiologie , Adolescent , Études rétrospectives , Transfusion sanguine/statistiques et données numériques , Plaies pénétrantes/mortalité , Plaies pénétrantes/thérapie , Sujet âgé , Centres de traumatologieRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) continues to be a major cause of morbidity in trauma. It is unclear whether the type of hemorrhage control procedure (i.e., splenectomy versus angioembolization) is associated with an increased risk of VTE. We hypothesize that hemodynamically stable patients undergoing angioembolization for blunt high-grade splenic injuries have lower rates of VTE compared to those undergoing splenectomy. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program dataset from 2017 to 2019 was queried to identify all patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade 3-5 blunt splenic injuries. Outcomes including VTE rates were compared between those who were managed with splenectomy versus angioembolization. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed adjusting for age, sex, initial vital signs, Injury Severity Score, and splenic injury grade. RESULTS: The analysis included 4698 matched patients (splenectomy [n = 2349] and angioembolization [n = 2349]). The median (interquartile range) age was 41 (27-58) years and 69% were male. Patients were well matched between groups. Angioembolization was associated with significantly lower VTE than splenectomy (2.2% versus 3.4%, P = 0.010) despite less use of VTE chemoprophylaxis (70% versus 80%, P < 0.001), as well as a relative delay in initiation of chemoprophylaxis (44 h versus 33 h, P < 0.001). Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay and mortality were also significantly lower in the angioembolization group. CONCLUSIONS: Angioembolization is associated with a significantly lower incidence of VTE than splenectomy. Thus, angioembolization should be considered for initial management of hemodynamically stable patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries in whom laparotomy is not otherwise indicated.
Sujet(s)
Embolisation thérapeutique , Rate , Splénectomie , Thromboembolisme veineux , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Thromboembolisme veineux/prévention et contrôle , Thromboembolisme veineux/étiologie , Thromboembolisme veineux/épidémiologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Rate/traumatismes , Rate/chirurgie , Rate/vascularisation , Splénectomie/effets indésirables , Splénectomie/statistiques et données numériques , Plaies non pénétrantes/complications , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/diagnostic , Études rétrospectives , Score de gravité des lésions traumatiques , Hémorragie/étiologie , Hémorragie/thérapie , Hémorragie/prévention et contrôle , Facteurs de risque , Score de propensionRÉSUMÉ
We present the case of a 10-year-old previously healthy male who suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest because of abdominal trauma and survived with excellent neurologic outcomes and near complete return to baseline functional status at hospital discharge. The rapid response and efficient mobilization of resources led to an excellent patient outcome despite the severity of injuries, including intra-abdominal injuries with expected mortality, out-of-hospital traumatic arrest, coagulopathy, and an extended pediatric intensive care unit stay. This case underscores the significance of timely advanced trauma life support interventions, especially early blood product administration, efficient transport, and airway management, while sharing a remarkable case of out-of-hospital pediatric traumatic arrest with near full recovery.
Sujet(s)
Arrêt cardiaque hors hôpital , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Mâle , Enfant , Arrêt cardiaque hors hôpital/thérapie , Arrêt cardiaque hors hôpital/étiologie , Plaies non pénétrantes/complications , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Traumatismes de l'abdomen/complications , Traumatismes de l'abdomen/thérapie , Services des urgences médicales/méthodes , Ambulances aéroportéesRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: We aim to evaluate the association of early versus late venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis on in-hospital mortality among patients with severe blunt isolated traumatic brain injuries. METHODS: Data from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File for 2017-2021 were analyzed. The target population included adult trauma patients with severe isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI). VTE prophylaxis types (low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin) and their administration timing were analyzed in relation to in-hospital complications and mortality. RESULTS: The study comprised 3609 patients, predominantly Caucasian males, with an average age of 48.5 y. Early VTE prophylaxis recipients were younger (P < 0.01) and more likely to receive unfractionated heparin (P < 0.01). VTE prophylaxis later than 24 h was associated with a higher average injury severity score and longer intensive care unit stays (P < 0.01). Logistic regression revealed that VTE prophylaxis later than 24 h was associated with significant reduction of in-hospital mortality by 38% (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.94, P = 0.02). Additionally, low molecular weight heparin use was associated with decreased mortality odds by 30% (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.89, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: VTE prophylaxis later than 24 h is associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with severe isolated blunt TBI, as opposed to VTE prophylaxis within 24 h. These findings suggest the need for timely and appropriate VTE prophylaxis in TBI care, highlighting the critical need for a comprehensive assessment and further research concerning the safety and effectiveness of VTE prophylaxis in these patient populations.
Sujet(s)
Anticoagulants , Lésions traumatiques de l'encéphale , Héparine bas poids moléculaire , Héparine , Mortalité hospitalière , Thromboembolisme veineux , Humains , Mâle , Thromboembolisme veineux/prévention et contrôle , Thromboembolisme veineux/étiologie , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Lésions traumatiques de l'encéphale/complications , Lésions traumatiques de l'encéphale/mortalité , Héparine/usage thérapeutique , Héparine/administration et posologie , Héparine bas poids moléculaire/administration et posologie , Héparine bas poids moléculaire/usage thérapeutique , Anticoagulants/usage thérapeutique , Anticoagulants/administration et posologie , Anticoagulants/effets indésirables , Sujet âgé , Études rétrospectives , États-Unis/épidémiologie , Score de gravité des lésions traumatiques , Plaies non pénétrantes/complications , Plaies non pénétrantes/mortalité , Plaies non pénétrantes/diagnostic , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Clinical implications of screening for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) after low-energy mechanisms of injury (LEMI) remain unclear. We assessed BCVI incidence and outcomes in LEMI versus high-energy mechanisms of injury (HEMI) patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, blunt trauma adults admitted between July 2015 and June 2021 with cervical spine fractures, excluding single spinous process, osteophyte, and chronic fractures were included. Demographics, comorbidities, injuries, screening and treatment data, iatrogenic complications, and mortality were collected. Our primary end point was to compare BCVI rates between LEMI and HEMI patients. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty patients (78%) were screened for BCVI; 120 were positive for BCVI. LEMI and HEMI groups presented similar BCVI rates (12.6% versus 14.4%; P = 0.640). Compared to HEMI patients (n = 95), LEMI patients (n = 25) were significantly older (79 ± 14.9 versus 54.3 ± 17.4, P < 0.001), more likely to be on anticoagulants before admission (64% versus 23.2%, P < 0.001), and less severely injured (LEMI injury severity score 10.9 ± 6.6 versus HEMI injury severity score 18.7 ± 11.4, P = 0.001). All but one LEMI and 90.5% of the HEMI patients had vertebral artery injuries with no significant difference in BCVI grades. One HEMI patient developed acute kidney injury because of BCVI screening. Eleven HEMI patients developed BCVI-related stroke with two related mortalities. One LEMI patient died of a BCVI-related stroke. CONCLUSIONS: BCVI rates were similar between HEMI and LEMI groups when screening based on cervical spine fractures. The LEMI group exhibited no screening or treatment complications, suggesting that benefits may outweigh the risks of screening and potential bleeding complications from treatment.
Sujet(s)
Lésions traumatiques cérébrovasculaires , Vertèbres cervicales , Fractures du rachis , Plaies non pénétrantes , Humains , Études rétrospectives , Femelle , Mâle , Vertèbres cervicales/traumatismes , Adulte d'âge moyen , Fractures du rachis/épidémiologie , Fractures du rachis/étiologie , Fractures du rachis/diagnostic , Sujet âgé , Plaies non pénétrantes/diagnostic , Plaies non pénétrantes/complications , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/mortalité , Plaies non pénétrantes/épidémiologie , Adulte , Lésions traumatiques cérébrovasculaires/diagnostic , Lésions traumatiques cérébrovasculaires/complications , Lésions traumatiques cérébrovasculaires/épidémiologie , Lésions traumatiques cérébrovasculaires/étiologie , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Incidence , Appréciation des risques/statistiques et données numériques , Appréciation des risques/méthodesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Trauma care depends on a complex transfer system to ensure timely and adequate management at major trauma centers. Patient outcomes depend on the reliability of triage in local or community hospitals and access to tertiary or quaternary trauma institutions. Patients with polytrauma, extremity trauma, or vascular injuries require multidisciplinary management at trauma hospitals. Our study investigated outcomes in this population at a level one trauma center in San Bernardino County, the largest geographic county in the contiguous United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with extremity trauma who presented to a single level 1 trauma center over 10 years. The cohort was divided into following two groups: 1. transferred from another medical center for a higher level of care or 2. those who directly presented. Overall, 19,417 patients were identified, with 15,317 patients presenting directly and 3,830 patients transferred from an outside hospital. Extremity of vascular injuries was observed in 268 patients. Demographic data were ascertained, including the injury severity score, mechanism of injury, response level, arrival method, tertiary center emergency department disposition, and presence of vascular injury in the upper or lower extremities. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess patient mortality. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients with vascular injuries were analyzed, including 207 nontransferred and 61 transferred patients. In the univariate analysis, injury severity score means were compared at 11.4 in nontransferred patients versus 8.4 in transferred (P < 0.001), 50% of blunt injury in the nontransferred group, and 28% in the transferred group (P < 0.001); in-hospital mortality was 4% in nontransferred patients versus 28% in the transferred group (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that mortality is 8 times more likely if a patient with vascular extremity injuries is transferred from an outside hospital. A 10% mortality rate was observed in patients without blood transfusion within 4 hr of arrival to the trauma center and 3% mortality in transferred patients transfused blood. CONCLUSIONS: Extremity trauma with vascular injury can be lethal if managed appropriately. Patients transferred to our level 1 trauma center had a substantial increase in mortality compared with nontransferred patients. Furthermore, the transfer distance was associated with increased mortality. Further research is required to address this vulnerable patient population.
Sujet(s)
Mortalité hospitalière , Score de gravité des lésions traumatiques , Transfert de patient , Centres de traumatologie , Lésions du système vasculaire , Plaies non pénétrantes , Plaies pénétrantes , Humains , Lésions du système vasculaire/mortalité , Lésions du système vasculaire/chirurgie , Lésions du système vasculaire/imagerie diagnostique , Lésions du système vasculaire/thérapie , Études rétrospectives , Mâle , Femelle , Plaies non pénétrantes/mortalité , Plaies non pénétrantes/thérapie , Plaies non pénétrantes/chirurgie , Adulte , Plaies pénétrantes/mortalité , Plaies pénétrantes/diagnostic , Plaies pénétrantes/chirurgie , Plaies pénétrantes/thérapie , Facteurs de risque , Facteurs temps , Adulte d'âge moyen , Californie/épidémiologie , Résultat thérapeutique , Appréciation des risques , Jeune adulte , Membres/vascularisation , Membres/traumatismes , Sujet âgéRÉSUMÉ
Diaphragm injuries are rarely seen injuries in trauma patients and are difficult to diagnose. With improving technology, computed tomography has become more reliable, but with increasing rates of non-operative management of both penetrating and blunt trauma, the rate of missed diaphragmatic injury has increased. The long-term complications of missed injury include bowel obstruction and perforation, which can carry a mortality rate as high as 85%. When diagnosed, injuries should be repaired to reduce the risk of future complications.