ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The impact of safety-net status, case volume, and outcomes among geriatric head and neck cancer patients is unknown. METHODS: Chi-square tests and Student's t tests to compare head and neck surgery outcomes of elderly patients between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. Multivariable linear regressions to determine predictors of outcome variables including mortality index, ICU stays, 30-day readmission, total direct cost, and direct cost index. RESULTS: Compared with non-safety-net hospitals, safety-net hospitals had a higher average mortality index (1.04 vs. 0.32, p = 0.001), higher mortality rate (1% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.002), and higher direct cost index (p = 0.001). A multivariable model of mortality index found the interaction between safety-net status and medium case volume was predictive of higher mortality index (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Safety-net status is correlated with higher mortality index and cost in geriatric head and neck cancer patients. The interaction between medium volume and safety-net status is independently predictive of higher mortality index.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Safety-net Providers , Humans , Aged , Patient Readmission , Patients , Hospitals , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To raise awareness of the growing list of non-platinum-based chemo- and immunotherapeutic agents that have been associated with ototoxicity and to introduce the possible mechanism of ototoxicity of these agents. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses). PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for published reports of ototoxicity from non-platinum-based chemo- and immunotherapeutic agents in adult and pediatric patients. Therapies that utilized any platinum-based agent were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Ototoxicity from non-platinum-based chemo- and immunotherapies is an evolving problem. There were 54 reports-39 case reports and 15 cohort studies-documenting ototoxicity from 7 agents/combination therapies. Of these reports, 37 (69%) were published within the last 15 years (after 2005). No recovery of hearing was documented in 21 of 56 cases (38%). Pretreatment audiograms were uncommon (19/54 studies, 35%), despite documented ototoxic associations. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There is a growing number of novel, ototoxic, non-platinum-based chemo- and immunotherapeutic agents with various potential mechanisms of action. Otolaryngologists will need to prioritize awareness of these agents. This growing list of agents, many of which have reversible effects, suggest a need for standardized ototoxicity monitor protocols so that appropriate and timely management options can be implemented.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Hearing Loss , Ototoxicity , Adult , Child , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Cisplatin , Hearing Loss/complications , Ototoxicity/drug therapy , Ototoxicity/etiology , Immunotherapy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare surgical morbidity, functional and aesthetic restoration, and health-related quality of life among patients receiving anterolateral thigh (ALT) or radial forearm (RFF) free flaps for intra-oral reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CDSR databases were searched from 2000 to 2022. Primary outcomes included flap survival, recipient site complications, donor site morbidity, recovery of oral function, and quality of life among patients after oncologic resection and reconstruction of oral cavity defects with ALT or RFF. RESULTS: A total of 23 criteria-meeting studies with 685 ALT and 723 RFF patients were included. There were no differences between the two groups in flap survival or the likelihood of flap-related complications. There was a significantly lower likelihood of donor site morbidity among ALT patients, specifically hypertrophic scarring (OR 0.24, 95 % CI: 0.06-0.96), tendon exposure (OR 0.13, 95 % CI: 0.03-0.60), paresthesia (OR: 0.06, 95 % CI: 0.01-0.25), movement impairment (OR: 0.12, 95 % CI: 0.04-0.38), and social stigma (OR: 0.10, 95 % CI: 0.03-0.28). ALT patients were significantly more likely to be satisfied with the donor site appearance (OR: 8.75, 95 % CI: 1.11-68.73). There were no significant differences in recovery of regular diet and speech or quality of life. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the ALT achieves equivalent flap survival rates and oral function with less donor site morbidity compared to the RFF for intra-oral reconstruction. Nonetheless, choice of free flap should incorporate surgeon- and patient-specific factors that may not be reflected in the studies included in this meta-analysis.
Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Free Tissue Flaps/surgery , Quality of Life , Thigh/surgery , Mouth/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To provide a consensus statement describing best practices and evidence regarding head and neck cancer survivorship. METHODS: Key topics regarding head and neck cancer survivorship were identified by the multidisciplinary membership of the American Head and Neck Society Survivorship, Supportive Care & Rehabilitation Service. Guidelines were generated by combining expert opinion and a review of the literature and categorized by level of evidence. RESULTS: Several areas regarding survivorship including dysphonia, dysphagia, fatigue, chronic pain, intimacy, the ability to return to work, financial toxicity, lymphedema, psycho-oncology, physical activity, and substance abuse were identified and discussed. Additionally, the group identified and described the role of key clinicians in survivorship including surgical, medical and radiation oncologists; dentists; primary care physicians; psychotherapists; as well as physical, occupational, speech, and respiratory therapists. CONCLUSION: Head and neck cancer survivorship is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach centered around patients and their caregivers. As survival related to head and neck cancer treatment improves, addressing post-treatment concerns appropriately is critically important to our patient's quality of life. There continues to be a need to define effective and efficient programs that can coordinate this multidisciplinary effort toward survivorship.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Follow-up care in head and neck cancers (HNC) is critical in managing patient health. However, social determinants of health (SDOH) can create difficulties in maintaining follow-up care. The study goal is to explore how SDOH impacts maintenance of HNC follow-up care appointments. METHODS: A systematic retrospective chart review of 877 HNC patients diagnosed in the past 10 years a safety-net tertiary care hospital with systems to help reduce care disparities. Cohort groups were identified and compared against protocols for follow-up. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, two-sample t-tests, and simple linear regression. RESULTS: The average length of follow-up time in months and average total number of follow-ups over 5 years were 32.96 (34.60) and 9.24 (7.87), respectively. There was no significant difference in follow-up care between United States (US) versus non-US born and English versus non-English speaking patients. Race/ethnicity, county median household income, insurance status, and county educational attainment were not associated with differences in follow-up. However, living a greater distance from the hospital was associated with lower follow-up length and less frequency in follow-up (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: While income, primary language, country of birth, race/ethnicity, insurance status, and markers of educational attainment do not appear to impact HNC follow-up at our safety-net, tertiary care institution, and distance from hospital remains an important contributor to disparities in care. This study shows that many barriers to care can be addressed in a model that addresses SDOH, but there are barriers that still require additional systems and resources. Laryngoscope, 132:1022-1028, 2022.
Subject(s)
Aftercare , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Insurance Coverage , Retrospective Studies , Social Determinants of Health , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study compares select social determinants of health (SDOH) with treatment modality selection and treatment completion in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, to better understand disparities in health outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of HNC (n = 1428) patients was conducted. Demographic and disease-specific variables were recorded, including treatment modality selection and completion. Data were analyzed using two-sample t tests, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Primary language was significantly associated with treatment choice, where non-English speakers were less likely to choose treatment as recommended by the Tumor Board. Lower mean distance from the hospital (37.38 [48.31] vs. 16.92 [19.10], p < 0.0001) and a county-based higher mean percentage of bachelor degree or higher education (42.16 [8.82] vs. 44.95 [6.19], p < 0.0003) were associated with treatment selection. CONCLUSION: Language, distance from the hospital, and education affected treatment selection in this study and may be useful in understanding how to counsel patients on treatment selection for HNC.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Social Determinants of Health , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
SUMMARY: The novel coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic presents a unique challenge to the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Although plastic surgeons may be postponing elective operations, there are still a number of emergent or urgent procedures that may need to be performed, and surgeons may be facing the reality of returning to a new normalcy of operating with coronavirus disease of 2019. These procedures, consisting of those such as head and neck reconstruction or maxillofacial trauma, largely require a multidisciplinary approach and may be considered of higher risk to health care workers because of the involvement of areas of the body identified as sources for viral transmission. Moreover, viral transmission may potentially extend beyond respiratory secretions, which has been the main focus of most safety precautions. The authors aim to present the scope of these procedures and the means of viral transmission, and to provide safety precaution recommendations for plastic surgery and its related disciplines.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , N95 Respirators , Occupational Health/standards , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Surgery, Plastic , COVID-19/diagnosis , Emergencies , Humans , Patient Care TeamABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has drawn attention to aerosol-generating medical procedures (AGMPs) in health care environments as a potential mode of transmission. Many organizations and institutions have published AGMP safety guidelines, and several mention the use of simulation in informing their recommendations; however, current methods used to simulate aerosol generation are heterogenous. Creation of a high-fidelity, easily producible aerosol-generating cough simulator would meet a high-priority educational need across all medical specialties. In this communication, we describe the design, construction, and user study of a novel cough simulator, which demonstrates the utility of simulation in raising AGMP safety awareness for providers of all roles, specialties, and training levels.
Subject(s)
Aerosols , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Cough , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Simulation Training , Equipment Design , Humans , Manikins , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment , SARS-CoV-2 , TracheostomyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether surgical case volume is a predictive factor of surgical outcomes when managing geriatric patients with head andneck cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used. Data were obtainedfrom the Vizient Database, which included a total of 93 academicinstitutions. Men and women aged between 65 and 100 years undergoing head and neck cancer surgery during 2009 and 2012,excluding cases of thyroid cancer and skin cancer of the head and neck(n = 4544) were included in the study. Hospital case volume was definedas low (≤21 cases/year), moderate (22-49 cases/year), or high (≥50 cases/year). The frequency of comorbidities and complications wasmeasured by hospital case volume using a χ2 test. Significancewas determined with an α level of .05. RESULTS: The largest number of head and neck cancer cases involving comorbidities (90.54%) and the highest rate of overall complications(27.50%) occurred in moderate case volume institutions compared to athe complication rate of 22.89% in low volume hospitals and 21.50% in highvolume hospitals (P < .0001). The most common comorbidities across all3 hospital case volumes included hypertension, metastatic cancer,and chronic pulmonary disease and the most common complicationsincluded hemorrhage/hematoma and postoperative pulmonarycompromise. CONCLUSION: With more geriatric patients requiring surgery for head andneck cancer, it would be beneficial to manage the more complex cases at high volume centers and to develop multidisciplinary teams to optimizecase management and minimize complications.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Low-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Early-stage glottic laryngeal cancer is treated with surgery or radiotherapy (RT), but limited randomized data exists to support one modality over the other. This study evaluates survival differences in early glottic cancer patients treated with either surgery or RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 14,498 patients with early glottic cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 and treated with surgery or RT were identified in the National Cancer Database. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze differences in overall survival (OS) by treatment (surgery vs. RT) and radiation dose fractionation. Cox regression modeling and propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis were performed. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed. RESULTS: Median follow-up and median OS for all patients were 49.5 and 118 months, respectively. The estimated 5-year OS for surgery and RT was 77.5% and 72.6%, respectively (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, aHR (95% CI) for surgery compared to RT was 0.87 (0.81-0.94, P = 0.0004). Compared to RT regimen 63-67.5 Gray (Gy) in 28-30 fractions, worse survival was noted for RT regimen 66-70 Gy in 33-35 fractions (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.23, P = 0.0003). When compared with hypofractionated RT (63-67.5 Gy in 28-30 fractions), patients undergoing surgery no longer showed improved OS (aHR 0.94, 95% CI 0.86-1.02, P = 0.154). The finding was confirmed on PSM analysis (surgery aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.05, P = 0.322). CONCLUSION: In early glottic tumors, patients treated with surgery demonstrated improved survival compared to RT, but when hypofractionation was considered, there were no significant differences in OS between patients undergoing surgery or RT.
Subject(s)
Glottis , Laryngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Laryngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Laryngectomy , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Laryngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Laryngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Radiotherapy Dosage , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
We aim to evaluate a novel bioresorbable fiducial for marking tumor bed margins in head and neck cancers (HNCs) to improve upon current use of nonresorbable materials. A feasibility test was done placing the marker (L-lactide and ε-caprolactone) in an orange for computed tomography (CT) and applesauce for T1-, T2-, and PD-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image acquisition, using routine clinical parameters. The resulting CT and MRI images showed excellent delineation of the marker with all of its margins well seen without adjacent artifact. The marker appeared similar to air on CT and MRI, surrounded by fluid-like appearance of the medium. Surgical bed appearance when radiotherapy is planned should not produce any artifact near the marker, and there should be no inherent marker-related artifact. These pilot CT and MR images show clinical utility for intraoperative marking of positive margins in the skull base or neck to guide future treatment and monitoring.
Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Fiducial Markers , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Models, BiologicalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted medical training. Here we assess its effect on head and neck surgical education. METHODS: Surveys were sent to current accredited program directors and trainees to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the fellow's experience and employment search. Current fellows' operative logs were compared with those of the 2018 to 2019 graduates. RESULTS: Despite reduction in operative volume, 82% of current American Head and Neck Society fellows have reached the number of major surgical operations to support certification. When surveyed, 86% of program directors deemed their fellow ready to enter practice. The majority of fellows felt prepared to practice ablative (96%), and microvascular surgery (73%), and 57% have secured employment to follow graduation. Five (10%) had a pending job position put on hold due to the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, current accredited trainees remain well-positioned to obtain proficiency and enter the work-force.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Curriculum , Fellowships and Scholarships/organization & administration , Otolaryngology/education , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Male , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , United StatesABSTRACT
Importance: The rapidly expanding novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has challenged the medical community to an unprecedented degree. Physicians and health care workers are at added risk of exposure and infection during the course of patient care. Because of the rapid spread of this disease through respiratory droplets, health care workers who come in close contact with the upper aerodigestive tract during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, such as otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons, are particularly at risk. A set of safety recommendations was created based on a review of the literature and communications with physicians with firsthand knowledge of safety procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Observations: A high number of health care workers were infected during the first phase of the pandemic in the city of Wuhan, China. Subsequently, by adopting strict safety precautions, other regions were able to achieve high levels of safety for health care workers without jeopardizing the care of patients. The most common procedures related to the examination and treatment of upper aerodigestive tract diseases were reviewed. Each category was reviewed based on the potential risk imposed to health care workers. Specific recommendations were made based on the literature, when available, or consensus best practices. Specific safety recommendations were made for performing tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19. Conclusions and Relevance: Preserving a highly skilled health care workforce is a top priority for any community and health care system. Based on the experience of health care systems in Asia and Europe, by following strict safety guidelines, the risk of exposure and infection of health care workers could be greatly reduced while providing high levels of care. The provided recommendations, which may evolve over time, could be used as broad guidance for all health care workers who are involved in the care of patients with COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Consensus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Otolaryngology/standards , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/surgery , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/standards , Patient Care/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Humans , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The declining 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with laryngeal cancer has been associated with increased nonsurgical management of stage III/IV disease. To further assess this hypothesis, the authors evaluated recent OS trends and patterns of use between larynx-preserving approaches with chemoradiation (CRT) or partial laryngectomy (PL) and total laryngectomy (TL) stratified by tumor and nodal burden. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify 8703 patients with stage III/IV (excluding T1 tumors) laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated between 2003 and 2011 with CRT or upfront PL or TL with or without adjuvant therapy. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Among patients with non-T4, low nodal burden (T2N1 or T3N0-N1) disease, no survival differences were observed between CRT, PL, and TL. Patients who had non-T4, high nodal burden (T2-T3N2-N3) disease who underwent TL with or without adjuvant treatment had a higher risk of death compared with those who received CRT (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04-1.51; P = .016). For T4N0-N3 tumors, TL compared with CRT was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92; P = .002). No statistically significant difference in outcome was noted between CRT and PL for all stage groups. The use of CRT has declined and receipt of TL has increased since 2006 for T4 disease, whereas PL rates have remained stably low. CONCLUSIONS: No survival differences were noted between surgical and nonsurgical approaches for patients with non-T4, low nodal burden laryngeal cancer. Patients with non-T4, high nodal burden disease may benefit from definitive CRT. Total laryngectomy remains advantageous in patients with T4 disease.
Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Laryngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Laryngectomy/statistics & numerical data , Organ Sparing Treatments/statistics & numerical data , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Laryngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Laryngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Laryngectomy/methods , Larynx/pathology , Larynx/radiation effects , Larynx/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Retrospective Studies , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/mortality , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: As imaging technology improves and more thyroid nodules and malignancies are identified, it is important to recognize factors associated with malignancy and poor prognosis. Vitamin D has proven useful as a prognostic tool for other cancers and may be similarly useful in thyroid cancer. This study explores the relationship of Vitamin D to papillary thyroid carcinoma stage while accounting for socioeconomic covariates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent thyroidectomy at one institution between 2000 and 2015 were reviewed. Subjects with non-papillary thyroid cancer pathology, prior malignancy, and without Vitamin D levels were excluded. The remaining 334 patient records were examined for cancer stage, Vitamin D levels, Vitamin D deficiency listed in history, and demographic and comorbid factors. RESULTS: Vitamin D laboratory values showed no significant relationship to cancer stage (pâ¯=â¯0.871), but patients with Vitamin D deficiency documented in the medical record were more likely to have advanced disease (28.6% versus 14.7%; pâ¯=â¯0.028). The patients with documented Vitamin D deficiency also had lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D nadirs (21.5â¯ng/mL versus 26.5â¯ng/mL, pâ¯=â¯0.008) and were more likely to be on Vitamin D supplementation (92.6% versus 41.8%, pâ¯<â¯0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that Vitamin D deficiency may have value as a negative prognostic indicator in papillary thyroid cancer and that pre-operative laboratory evaluation may be less useful. This is important because Vitamin D deficiency is modifiable. While different racial subgroups had different rates of Vitamin D deficiency, neither race nor socioeconomic status showed correlation with cancer stage.
Subject(s)
Negative Results , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroidectomy , Vitamin D Deficiency , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Socioeconomic Factors , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/etiology , Thyroid Neoplasms/etiology , Vitamin D/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/complicationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal sequencing of chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced laryngeal cancer. The hypothesis was that concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) would be associated with improved overall survival (OS) compared to induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (RT)/surgery (IC). METHODS: The National Cancer Database identified 8,154 patients with American Joint Commission on Cancer stage III/IV (excluding T1) laryngeal cancer between 2004 and 2013 treated with one of the established organ preservation techniques: CCRT or IC. The association between OS and total radiation dose (< 66 gray [Gy] or ≥ 66 Gy) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, as was the association between OS and timing of IC (21-42, 43-100, or 101-120 days before RT). Hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for patient and clinical characteristics were computed using Cox regression modeling. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 32.7 months. The estimated 5-year OS for CCRT and IC was 49.9% and 50.6%, respectively (P = 0.653). On multivariate analysis, no difference was observed between the two regimens (IC, adjusted HR 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.04, P = 0.268). Radiation dose ≥66 Gy had improved OS overall in CCRT group but not in IC patients. When comparing CCRT and IC in patients receiving ≥66 Gy, there was no difference in OS (adjusted HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.06, P = 0.552). Patients starting chemotherapy 21 to 42 or 101 to 120 days prior to RT had inferior OS compared to patients starting between 43 to 100 days. CONCLUSION: For locally advanced laryngeal cancer, there is no difference in OS between CCRT and IC. Factors associated with survival included radiation dose and timing of induction chemotherapy before RT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b Laryngoscope, 129:2313-2320, 2019.
Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy/mortality , Induction Chemotherapy/methods , Laryngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Radiation Dosage , Adult , Aged , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Databases, Factual , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Laryngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The most common head and neck paraganglioma is the carotid body paraganglioma. Treatment of carotid body tumors is primarily surgical, and uncontrolled growth leads to cranial nerve deficits and more morbid resection. METHODS: A 60-year-old man was referred for evaluation of carotid body tumor, and workup revealed an internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm within the known mass. RESULTS: Interventional Radiology performed angiogram and stenting across aneurysm with interval dramatic reduction in size of mass, and surgery was avoided altogether. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection is indicated for carotid body paragangliomas when the patient can tolerate the surgery and when the tumor was not very advanced. This patient had a small tumor that initially appeared easily resectable. Failure to detect the ICA aneurysm before resection may have resulted in devastating vascular injury and possible stroke or death. Identification of underlying vascular pathology is essential for safe treatment and should be prioritized, especially considering this case.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm/complications , Carotid Artery Diseases/complications , Carotid Artery, Internal , Carotid Body Tumor/complications , Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Artery Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Artery, Internal/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Body Tumor/diagnostic imaging , Computed Tomography Angiography , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recommendations for perioperative therapy in head and neck cancer are not explicit and recurrence occurs frequently. Circulating tumor DNA is an emerging cancer biomarker, but has not been extensively explored for detection of recurrence in head and neck cancer. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were recruited into the study protocol. Tumors were sequenced to identify patient-specific mutations. Mutations were then identified in plasma circulating tumor DNA from pre-treatment blood samples and longitudinally during standard follow-up. Circulating tumor DNA status during follow-up was correlated to disease recurrence. RESULTS: Samples were taken from eight patients. Tumor mutations were verified in seven patients. Baseline circulating tumor DNA was positive in six patients. Recurrence occurred in four patients, two of whom had detectable circulating tumor DNA prior to recurrence. CONCLUSION: Circulating tumor DNA is a potential tool for disease and recurrence monitoring following curative therapy in head and neck cancer, allowing for better prognostication, and/or modification of treatment strategies.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Circulating Tumor DNA/blood , Head and Neck Neoplasms/blood , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/blood , Aged , DNA, Neoplasm/blood , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Liquid Biopsy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/physiopathology , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sampling Studies , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/mortality , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Survival Analysis , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine if adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with pT2N0 oral cavity tongue cancer affects overall survival. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: National Cancer Database. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Cases diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with pathologic stage pT2N0 oral cavity tongue cancer with negative surgical margins were extracted from the National Cancer Database. Data were stratified by treatment received, including surgery only and surgery + postoperative radiation therapy. Univariate analysis was performed with a 2-sample t test, chi-square test, or Fisher exact test and log-rank test, while multivariate analysis was performed with Cox regression models adjusted for individual variables as well as a propensity score. RESULTS: A total of 934 patients were included in the study, with 27.5% of patients receiving surgery with postoperative radiation therapy (n = 257). In univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in 3-year overall survival between the patient groups ( P = .473). In multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in survival between the treatment groups, with adjuvant radiation therapy having a hazard ratio of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.60-1.44; P = .748). Regarding tumors with a depth of invasion >5 mm, there was no survival benefit for the patients who received postoperative radiation therapy as compared with those who received surgery alone (hazard ratio = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.57-1.53; P = .769). CONCLUSION: An overall survival benefit was not demonstrated for patients who received postoperative radiation therapy versus surgery alone for pT2N0 oral cavity tongue cancer, irrespective of depth of tumor invasion.