Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 142: 111460, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32505700

ABSTRACT

Insect-based foods are starting to enter the EU market, raising concerns about their safety. Allergic consumers might be exposed to even a greater risk, since insects have proven to trigger allergic symptoms, particularly in patients sensitised to crustaceans. Current legislation does not enforce producers to include insects in the list of allergenic ingredients. Food allergenicity risk assessment (FARA) is still at its infancy, and the debate on the need to define allergen thresholds is open. In this paper, we aimed at applying the concepts of stochastic quantitative FARA to describe present and future scenarios of exposure to foods containing Tenebrio molitor, the yellow mealworm. According to our risk characterisation, mealworm-based food products represent a major risk for individuals allergic to crustaceans to develop symptoms after the consumption of a dose lower than a serving size. Moreover, other allergic consumers might be at risk. A correct labelling of insect containing foods would help safeguarding the health of EU allergic consumers. Quantitatively assessing the risk of allergenicity provides a clear description of the problem, facilitating the decisional process of the risk manager, supporting the implementation of effective allergen management procedures and limiting the phenomenon of uninformative precautionary labelling.


Subject(s)
Allergens/toxicity , Food Contamination/analysis , Tenebrio , Animals , Food Hypersensitivity , Humans , Risk Assessment
2.
Arch Toxicol ; 92(7): 2385-2399, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29855658

ABSTRACT

The genetically modified maize event MON810 expresses a Bacillus thuringiensis-derived gene, which encodes the insecticidal protein Cry1Ab to control some lepidopteran insect pests such as the European corn borer. It has been claimed that the immune system may be affected following the oral/intragastric administration of the MON810 maize in various different animal species. In the frame of the EU-funded project GRACE, two 90-day feeding trials, the so-called studies D and E, were performed to analyze the humoral and cellular immune responses of male and female Wistar Han RCC rats fed the MON810 maize. A MON810 maize variety of Monsanto was used in the study D and a MON810 maize variety of Pioneer Hi-Bred was used in the study E. The total as well as the maize protein- and Cry1Ab-serum-specific IgG, IgM, IgA and IgE levels, the proliferative activity of the lymphocytes, the phagocytic activity of the granulocytes and monocytes, the respiratory burst of the phagocytes, a phenotypic analysis of spleen, thymus and lymph node cells as well as the in vitro production of cytokines by spleen cells were analyzed. No specific Cry1Ab immune response was observed in MON810 rats, and anti-maize protein antibody responses were similar in MON810 and control rats. Single parameters were sporadically altered in rats fed the MON810 maize when compared to control rats, but these alterations are considered to be of no immunotoxicological significance.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/toxicity , Food, Genetically Modified/toxicity , Immunity, Cellular , Immunity, Humoral , Plants, Genetically Modified/toxicity , Zea mays/genetics , Animal Feed/standards , Animals , Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins , Bacterial Proteins/immunology , Consumer Product Safety , Endotoxins/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Food, Genetically Modified/standards , Hemolysin Proteins/immunology , Immunoglobulins/blood , Plants, Genetically Modified/immunology , Rats, Wistar , Toxicity Tests, Chronic
3.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr ; 57(10): 2077-2094, 2017 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26558955

ABSTRACT

With the turn of this century, novel food processing techniques have become commercially very important because of their profound advantages over the traditional methods. These novel processing methods tend to preserve the characteristic properties of food including their organoleptic and nutritional qualities better when compared with the conventional food processing methods. During the same period of time, there is a clear rise in the populations suffering from food allergies, especially infants and children. Though, this fact is widely attributed to the changing livelihood of population in both developed and developing nations and to the introduction of new food habits with advent of novel foods and new processing techniques, their complete role is still uncertain. Under the circumstance, it is very important to understand the structural changes in the protein as food is processed to comprehend whether the specific processing technique (conventional and novel) is increasing or mitigating the allergenicity. Various modern means are now being employed to understand the conformational changes in the protein which can affect the allergenicity. In this review, the processing effects on protein structure and allergenicity are discussed along with the insinuations of recent studies and techniques for establishing a platform to investigate future pathway to reduce or eliminate allergenicity in the population.


Subject(s)
Allergens/analysis , Dietary Proteins/adverse effects , Fast Foods/adverse effects , Food Handling/methods , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Food Preservation/methods , Allergens/chemistry , Allergens/metabolism , Animals , Dietary Proteins/analysis , Dietary Proteins/chemistry , Dietary Proteins/metabolism , Fast Foods/analysis , Fermentation , Food Hypersensitivity/diet therapy , Food Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Food Microbiology/trends , Food, Preserved/adverse effects , Food, Preserved/analysis , Humans , Protein Conformation , Protein Stability , Proteolysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL