How Mild Is the Mild Long COVID? A Comprehensive Neuropsychological Assessment of Patients with Cognitive Complaints.

The global impact of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic has extended beyond physical health, leading to widespread mental health issues. Beyond respiratory symptoms, there is a growing concern about long-term cognitive effects, particularly in individuals who experienced mild cases of the infection. We aimed to investigate the neuropsychological aspects of long-term COVID-19 in non-hospitalized adults compared with a control group. This cross-sectional study included 42 participants, 22 individuals with a history of mild COVID, and 20 healthy controls. The participants were recruited from the community and underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. Participants from the mild COVID group reported cognitive symptoms persisting for an average of 203.86 days and presented a higher frequency of psychological treatment history (81.8%) compared with the control group (25.0%). History of anxiety disorders was more prevalent in the mild COVID group (63.6%) than in the control group (20.0%). Significant reductions in verbal working memory were observed in the mild COVID group. Levels of anxiety were found to have a significant impact on difficulties with visual recognition memory. This study reveals important neuropsychological alterations in individuals following mild COVID-19, emphasizing executive functions deficits. Our findings underscore the persistence of these deficits even in non-hospitalized cases, suggesting potential inflammatory mechanisms in the central nervous system. The study highlights the need for comprehensive assessments and targeted interventions to address the diverse cognitive impacts on individuals recovering from COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1 variant outbreak in a defined cohort: an epidemiological investigation incorporating longitudinal assessment of humoral response.

BACKGROUND: We describe an epidemiological investigation of a COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2-XBB.1 outbreak among healthcare workers (HCWs) returning from a 5-days educational tour abroad. METHODS: We prospectively followed participants for symptoms and sampled blood for neutralization assays of four SARS-CoV-2 variants (wild type, XBB, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86) at 1, 3, and 6 months after their return. When available, samples from the 3 months preceding the outbreak were also tested. We compared geometric mean titers (GMT) of neutralizing antibody titers of infected vs uninfected HCWs and febrile vs afebrile infected HCWs. RESULTS: Nineteen (10%) of 181 HCWs were infected, all had mild COVID-19, 90% (17/19) had symptoms, and 16% (3/19) reported fever. Infected individuals tended to have lower pre-exposure XBB-neutralizing antibody titers (GMT of 32 vs 107 ID50, p=0.248). Neutralization against XBB and newer sub-variants peaked at 3 months and was higher among infected individuals (GMT 702 vs 156 [p<0.001], 558 vs 163 [p=0.001], and 558 vs 182 [p=0.002], ID50 for XBB, EG.5.1., and BA.2.86, respectively). By six months, these differences were no longer observed. Fever was positively associated with XBB neutralization (GMT 3474 vs 485, ID50 p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Recently infected individuals are protected from reinfection with newer sub-variants. However, protection is likely short lived.

Different polarization and functionality of CD4+ T helper subsets in people with post-COVID condition.

Introduction: After mild COVID-19 that does not require hospitalization, some individuals develop persistent symptoms that may worsen over time, producing a multisystemic condition termed Post-COVID condition (PCC). Among other disorders, PCC is characterized by persistent changes in the immune system that may not be solved several months after COVID-19 diagnosis. Methods: People with PCC were recruited to determine the distribution and functionality of CD4+ T helper (Th) subsets in comparison with individuals with mild, severe, and critical presentations of acute COVID-19 to evaluate their contribution as risk or protective factors for PCC. Results: People with PCC showed low levels of Th1 cells, similar to individuals with severe and critical COVID-19, although these cells presented a higher capacity to express IFNγ in response to stimulation. Th2/Th1 correlation was negative in individuals with acute forms of COVID-19, but there was no significant Th2/Th1 correlation in people with PCC. Th2 cells from people with PCC presented high capacity to express IL-4 and IL-13, which are related to low ventilation and death associated with COVID-19. Levels of proinflammatory Th9 and Th17 subsets were significantly higher in people with PCC in comparison with acute COVID-19, being Th1/Th9 correlation negative in these individuals, which probably contributed to a more pro-inflammatory than antiviral scenario. Th17 cells from approximately 50% of individuals with PCC had no capacity to express IL-17A and IL-22, similar to individuals with critical COVID-19, which would prevent clearing extracellular pathogens. Th2/Th17 correlation was positive in people with PCC, which in the absence of negative Th1/Th2 correlation could also contribute to the proinflammatory state. Finally, Th22 cells from most individuals with PCC had no capacity to express IL-13 or IL-22, which could increase tendency to reinfections due to impaired epithelial regeneration. Discussion: People with PCC showed skewed polarization of CD4+ Th subsets with altered functionality that was more similar to individuals with severe and critical presentations of acute COVID-19 than to people who fully recovered from mild disease. New strategies aimed at reprogramming the immune response and redirecting CD4+ Th cell polarization may be necessary to reduce the proinflammatory environment characteristic of PCC.

A comparison of COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 syndrome among symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in Bangladesh: A retrospective cohort study.

Background: The differentiation between COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 syndromes is not properly defined as some patients remain asymptomatic for post-COVID-19. It can be characterized by several signs and symptoms. Risk factors related to post-COVID-19 remain unsolved. Here we aimed to differentiate post-COVID-19 patients among symptomatic and asymptomatic groups to check the percentage among them and the risk factors for post-COVID-19 and the association of different symptoms. Methods: This study was conducted in Chittagong division, Bangladesh at different hospitals. Data were collected from the participants either by in person interview or online (email) or mobile phone calls. Follow up was done after 3 months to check the development of post-COVID-19 syndromes. Relevant data were taken, and symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were divided based on the presence and severity of specific symptoms. Results: Our results showed that 41.88 % patients develop post-COVID-19 symptoms. Fever and Cough were classified as one of the factors of post-COVID-19, followed by dyspnea, fatigue, cough, rhinitis, sore throat, and muscular discomfort. On the other hand, age, respiratory distress, lethargy, duration of illness and severity were classified as risk factors for post-COVID-19. There was a significant difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients as only 16.3 % patients showed post-COVID-19 symptoms. Based on the severity grade, 80.7 % of patients had mild COVID-19. We also found that people with 'B' positive blood group had a higher chance of developing post-COVID-19 syndrome. Conclusion: It was concluded that age, duration of illness, presence of respiratory distress, blood group, and disease severity are major risk factors for the development of post-COVID-19 syndrome.

A novel deterioration prediction system for mild COVID-19 patients in Korea: a retrospective study.

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presents serious public health threats. Omicron, the current most prevalent strain of COVID-19, has a low fatality rate and very high transmissibility, so the number of patients with mild symptoms of COVID-19 is rapidly increasing. This change of pandemic challenges medical systems worldwide in many aspects, including sharp increases in demands for hospital infrastructure, critical shortages in medical equipment, and medical staff. Predicting deterioration in mild patients could alleviate these problems. A novel scoring system was proposed for predicting the deterioration of patients whose condition may worsen rapidly and those who all still mild or asymptomatic. Retrospective cohorts of 954 and 2,035 patients that quarantined in the Residential Treatment Center were assembled for derivation and external validation of mild COVID-19, respectively. Deterioration was defined as transfer to a local hospital due to worsening condition of the patients during the 2-week isolation period. A total of 15 variables: sex, age, seven pre-existing conditions (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, liver disease, kidney disease, and organ transplant), and five vital signs (systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), body temperature, and oxygen saturation (SpO2)) were collected. A scoring system was developed using seven variables (age, pulse rate, SpO2, SBP, DBP, temperature, and hypertension) with significant differences between the transfer and not transfer groups in logistic regression. The proposed system was compared with existing scoring systems that assess the severity of patient conditions. The performance of the proposed scoring system to predict deterioration in patients with mild COVID-19 showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of 0.868. This is a statistically significant improvement compared to the performance of the previous patient condition assessment scoring systems. During external validation, the proposed system showed the best and most robust predictive performance (AUC = 0.768; accuracy = 0.899). In conclusion, we proposed a novel scoring system for predicting patients with mild COVID-19 who will experience deterioration which could predict the deterioration of the patient's condition early with high predictive performance. Furthermore, because the scoring system does not require special calculations, it can be easily measured to predict the deterioration of a patients' condition. This system can be used as effective tool for early detection of deterioration in mild COVID-19 patients.

Cluster of Influenza A(H5) Cases Associated with Poultry Exposure at Two Facilities - Colorado, July 2024.

Persons who work in close contact with dairy cattle and poultry that are infected with highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A(H5N1) virus are at increased risk for infection. In July 2024, the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment responded to two poultry facilities with HPAI A(H5N1) virus detections in poultry. Across the two facilities, 663 workers assisting with poultry depopulation (i.e., euthanasia) received screening for illness; 109 (16.4%) reported symptoms and consented to testing. Among those who received testing, nine (8.3%) received a positive influenza A(H5) virus test result, and 19 (17.4%) received a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result. All nine workers who received positive influenza A(H5) test results had conjunctivitis, experienced mild illness, and received oseltamivir. This poultry exposure-associated cluster of human cases of influenza A(H5) is the first reported in the United States. The identification of these cases highlights the ongoing risk to persons who work in close contact with infected animals. Early response to each facility using multidisciplinary, multilingual teams facilitated case-finding, worker screening, and treatment. As the prevalence of HPAI A(H5N1) virus clade 2.3.4.4b genotype B3.13 increases, U.S. public health agencies should prepare to rapidly investigate and respond to illness in agricultural workers, including workers with limited access to health care.

COVID-19 Infection Manifesting with Maculopapular Rash: A Case Report.

COVID-19 commonly manifests with respiratory symptoms but is reported to involve other organs including the skin. This is a case of a 58-year-old male diagnosed with mild COVID-19 infection via reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swab (NPS). He initially presented with symptoms of fever, cough, colds, sore throat, anosmia, ageusia, myalgia, and diarrhea. Maculopapular cutaneous lesions appeared on the extremities on the 3rd day of illness and were described as pruritic and blanching. The patient was managed conservatively with oral hydration and vitamin supplementation. During home isolation, symptoms were monitored via telemedicine. He recovered and was asymptomatic 36 days from the onset of symptoms. During the early part of the pandemic, further diagnostic testing was challenging due to the restrictions that were implemented. However, careful history, modified physical examination, and monitoring through teleconsultation proved to be very useful. Documenting the course and outcome of COVID-19 patients with skin manifestations would help facilitate timely diagnosis and treatment, as well as anticipate the possible prognosis of patients who present with a similar clinical pattern.

Mild coronavirus disease 2019: Results of a multicentric prospective study on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 presence in semen fractions and cells and its effects on semen parameters.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the virus responsible for coronavirus disease 2019, affects multiple organs. The virus enters cells through angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 and host factors present in genital organs, leading to concern over virus shedding in semen and reproductive function. OBJECTIVES: To investigate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in semen from patients with a mild infection, identify the seminal infected cells, and explore the effect of the infection on sex hormones and semen parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study of 54 men with mild severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Semen was collected at 7, 15, 30, 60, 90, 180, and 365 days after symptom onset, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA was measured in serum, saliva, urine, and semen. The presence of infectious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in semen was assessed using Vero cell culture. Infected semen cells were identified using immunofluorescence against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 nucleoprotein antigen and cell markers. Semen characteristics as well as testosterone, inhibin B, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were determined. RESULTS: 11% of patients had at least one severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA-positive semen. One patient had viral semen shedding up to day 90 after infection onset, with replication-competent virus isolated from semen and 40% cell fraction at day 7. After sperm preparation, 90% fraction was severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA-positive at days 7 and 15. The swim-up fraction was positive only on day 7. In semen, nucleoprotein antigen was detected mainly in exfoliated epithelial cells and less frequently in Sertoli cells. Sperm count and motile sperm count were lower at day 30 than at day 7. Round cells in semen were increased during the acute phase. At days 7 and 15, sperm count and motile sperm count were lower in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA-positive semen compared with negative semen, while semen volume and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were increased. Long-term follow-up shows no evidence of a detrimental effect on hormonal or semen characteristics. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: 11% of patients with mild coronavirus disease 2019 who were not hospitalized had severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 excretions in semen, which persisted for up to 90 days in one patient. No germ cells appeared infected by the virus, but the detection of nucleoprotein antigen-positive epithelial semen cells and Sertoli cells suggests genital tract infection. Albeit infrequent, semen may contain the replication-competent virus during the acute phase with potential risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 transmissions during sexual contact and assisted reproduction procedures. The effect of mild coronavirus disease 2019 on spermatogenesis and reproductive hormones was moderate and reversible.

Assessment of health-related quality of life after mild COVID-19 infection.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) affected the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and its impact on well-being is not sufficiently understood yet. The worsening of HRQoL and symptoms such as fatigue, anxiety, depression, chronic Headache, Myalgia, ageusia, olfactory disorders, and cognitive impairment can be seen in people of different ages and genders after COVID-19 infection, even mild infections without hospitalization. These issues generate a disease burden that can reduce work skills and cause social, psychological, and neuropsychiatric challenges. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the HRQoL of patients affected by COVID-19, the domains most affected, and their relationship with fatigue, anxiety, depression, chronic Headache and Myalgia, ageusia, olfactory disorders, and cognitive impairment. METHODS: An analytical transverse was conducted with 143 patients after COVID-19 infection. The patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMS) were collected by the 36-item Short Form survey (SF-36), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Mini-Mental State Examination-2 (MMSE-2), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and a questionnaire regarding symptoms such as chronic Headache, myalgia, and olfactory disorders. Spearman's correlation test was used to correlate the performance of the patients on different PROMS. RESULTS: Fatigue, depression, and anxiety were negatively correlated with all the SF-36 domains, and patients with subjective cognitive complaints had low scores in all SF-36 domains. Furthermore, those with chronic Headaches had low scores in physical functioning, role-physical functioning, and vitality. Regarding myalgia complaints, the worst scores were observed in the physical functioning and vitality domains. Patients with ageusia had low scores in general health perceptions, and those with olfactory dysfunction had low scores in the vitality and mental health domains. CONCLUSIONS: Although the acute phase of COVID-19 has resolved, knowledge about HRQoL after this period is essential since many individual and collective changes have been taking place until today-patients with neuropsychiatric manifestations that persisted after the acute phase showed lower overall quality of life.

Previously healthy unvaccinated adults have significant functional limitations in the medium and long term after mild COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ongoing symptoms of COVID-19 can persist for weeks or months after the initial COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to identify persistent symptoms (fatigue, cognition, quality of life, anxiety, depression and physical measures) in unvaccinated community-managed patients following COVID-19 infection. METHOD: This was a prospective nested observational study of health and wellbeing measures determined seven and 13 months after COVID-19 infection, alongside physical abilities after 18 months. RESULTS: Data analyses were completed on 62 participants (60% female, median age 35 years). Severe fatigue was noted in 47% of participants at seven months and this had not improved significantly by 13 months (45%). Quality of life and mental health scores were significantly worse in individuals with severe fatigue. One-quarter of participants demonstrated mild cognitive impairment at seven months. After 18 months, walking and lung function were normal, but grip strength was reduced in 26% of participants. DISCUSSION: A significant proportion of unvaccinated COVID-19 patients had not returned to pre-illness levels of health and function after one year; screening functional ability and mental wellbeing is warranted in unvaccinated people with COVID-19.

A comparative study on anti-MOG and anti-AQP4 associated optic neuritis following mild COVID-19: insights from a Chinese single-center experience.

Background: Research on the relationship between mild COVID-19 and the subsequent development of isolated optic neuritis (ON) with antibodies specific to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-ON) and aquaporin 4 (AQP4-ON) is limited, particularly case-control studies that directly compare these conditions within the same affected population. Methods: A retrospective analysis of initial MOG-ON and AQP4-ON cases during the COVID-19 peak and subsequent months. Patients were classified as possible COVID-19 related ON (PCRON) or non-COVID-19 related ON (NCRON). The study compared epidemiology, comorbidities, and clinical features between these groups. Results: Patients with MOG-ON tended to develop ON symptoms closer in time to a mild COVID-19 infection compared to those with AQP4-ON (6.87 ± 6.25 weeks vs. 11.06 ± 5.84 weeks; p = 0.038), a significantly higher proportion of patients with MON-ON developing symptoms within 6 weeks after COVID-19 compared to those with AQP4-ON (15/23 [65.2%] vs. 5/17 [29.4%]; p = 0.025). Comparing MOG-ON and AQP4-ON patients, MOG-ON patients were more likely to have a recent infection before ON onset (73.1% vs. 30%; p = 0.007) and had better peak and post-treatment visual acuity (p = 0.01; p < 0.001). In contrast, AQP4-ON patients frequently showed comorbid connective tissue diseases (30.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.004) and antinuclear antibody abnormalities (40.0% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.012). Among MOG-ON patients, PCRON had increased rates of atherosclerotic vascular diseases (AVDs) (53.3% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.036), phospholipid antibody abnormalities (60.0% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.04), and bilateral visual impairment (66.7% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis pinpointed AVDs (OR = 15.21, p = 0.043) and bilateral involvement (OR = 25.15, p = 0.015) as independent factors related to COVID-19 associated MOG-ON, with both being good discriminators for PCRON (AUC = 0.879). No differences were found between the PCRON and NCRON groups in AQP4-ON patients. Conclusion: Mild COVID-19 is more likely associated with MOG-ON than AQP4-ON. MOG-ON that develops within 6 weeks following a COVID-19 infection may be associated with the COVID-19 infection. AVDs may have a synergistic effect on MOG-ON in patients with COVID-19, which warrants further investigation. COVID-19 related MOG-ON often affects both eyes, and acute visual function damage can be severe, but generally has a good prognosis.

Omicron variant and pulmonary involvements: a chest imaging analysis in asymptomatic and mild COVID-19.

Objectives: To identify clinical characteristics and risk factors for pulmonary involvements in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant by chest imaging analysis. Methods: Detailed data and chest computed tomography (CT) imaging features were retrospectively analyzed from asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients infected with Omicron between 24 April and 10 May 2022. We scored chest CT imaging features and categorized the patients into obvious pulmonary involvements (OPI) (score > 2) and not obvious pulmonary involvements (NOPI) (score ≤ 2) groups based on the median score. The risk factors for OPI were identified with analysis results visualized by nomogram. Results: In total, 339 patients were included (145 were male and 194 were female), and the most frequent clinical symptoms were cough (75.5%); chest CT imaging features were mostly linear opacities (42.8%). Pulmonary involvements were more likely to be found in the left lower lung lobe, with a significant difference in the lung total severity score of the individual lung lobes (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed age stratification [odds ratio (OR) = 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.548-2.383); p < 0.001], prolonged nucleic acid negative conversion time (NCT) (NCT > 8d) [OR = 1.842, 95% CI (1.104-3.073); p = 0.019], and pulmonary diseases [OR = 4.698, 95% CI (1.159-19.048); p = 0.03] as independent OPI risk factors. Conclusion: Asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients infected with Omicron had pulmonary involvements which were not uncommon. Potential risk factors for age stratification, prolonged NCT, and pulmonary diseases can help clinicians to identify OPI in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients infected with Omicron.

Castleman disease patients report mild COVID-19 symptoms and mount a humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has resulted in increased morbidity and mortality in patients with impaired immunity, hematologic malignancies, and immunosuppressive regimens. COVID-19 can cause a cytokine storm with some patients benefiting from blockade of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin 6 (IL6). As Castleman disease (CD) is an atypical lymphoproliferative disorder that can involve a cytokine storm and often requires immunosuppressive therapies, including IL6 inhibition, we sought to evaluate outcomes following COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in CD patients. We administered a survey in April 2021 to characterize experiences with COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among 300 CD patients enrolled in ACCELERATE, a natural history registry of CD patients. Among 128 respondents, the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection (16/95, 17%), severe disease (1/16, 6%), vaccination rates (112/128, 88%), and vaccine adverse effects after dose one (62/112, 55%) were comparable to the general U.S. population. While there were two cases of CD flares occurring shortly after SARS-CoV-2 infection (N=1) and vaccination (N=1), over 100 patients in this study that were infected and/or vaccinated did not experience CD flares. The median anti-spike titer six months after the second dose among CD patients was comparable to individuals with other immune-related diseases and healthy populations. Data from this small cohort suggest that, despite being on immunosuppressive therapies, CD patients do not appear to be at increased risk of poor COVID-19 outcomes and can mount a humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT02817997).

Cytokine Storm in COVID-19: Insight into Pathological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Benefits of Chinese Herbal Medicines.

Cytokine storm (CS) is the main driver of SARS-CoV-2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in severe coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). The pathological mechanisms of CS are quite complex and involve multiple critical molecular targets that turn self-limited and mild COVID-19 into a severe and life-threatening concern. At present, vaccines are strongly recommended as safe and effective treatments for preventing serious illness or death from COVID-19. However, effective treatment options are still lacking for people who are at the most risk or hospitalized with severe disease. Chinese herbal medicines have been shown to improve the clinical outcomes of mild to severe COVID-19 as an adjunct therapy, particular preventing the development of mild to severe ARDS. This review illustrates in detail the pathogenesis of CS-involved ARDS and its associated key molecular targets, cytokines and signalling pathways. The therapeutic targets were identified particularly in relation to the turning points of the development of COVID-19, from mild symptoms to severe ARDS. Preclinical and clinical studies were reviewed for the effects of Chinese herbal medicines together with conventional therapies in reducing ARDS symptoms and addressing critical therapeutic targets associated with CS. Multiple herbal formulations, herbal extracts and single bioactive phytochemicals with or without conventional therapies demonstrated strong anti-CS effects through multiple mechanisms. However, evidence from larger, well-designed clinical trials is lacking and their detailed mechanisms of action are yet to be well elucidated. More research is warranted to further evaluate the therapeutic value of Chinese herbal medicine for CS in COVID-19-induced ARDS.

Long term follow-up of heart rate variability in healthcare workers with mild COVID-19.

Introduction: Prior investigations into post-COVID dysautonomia often lacked control groups or compared affected individuals solely to healthy volunteers. In addition, no data on the follow-up of patients with SARS-CoV-2-related autonomic imbalance are available. Methods: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive clinical and functional follow-up on healthcare workers (HCWs) with former mild COVID-19 (group 1, n = 67), to delineate the trajectory of post-acute autonomic imbalance, we previously detected in a case-control study. Additionally, we assessed HCWs for which a test before SARS-CoV-2 infection was available (group 2, n = 29), who later contracted SARS-CoV-2, aiming to validate findings from our prior case-control investigation. We evaluated autonomic nervous system heart modulation by means of time and frequency domain heart rate variability analysis (HRV) in HCWs during health surveillance visits. Short-term electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings, were obtained at about 6, 13 months and both at 6 and 13 months from the negative SARS-CoV-2 naso-pharyngeal swab (NPS) for group 1 and at about 1-month from the negative NPS for group 2. HCWs who used drugs, had comorbidities that affected HRV, or were hospitalized with severe COVID-19 were excluded. Results: Group 1 was split into three subgroups clinically and functionally followed at, about 6 months (subgroup-A, n = 17), 13 months (subgroup-B, n = 37) and both at 6 and 13 months (subgroup-C, n = 13) from the negative SARS-CoV-2 NPS. In subgroup-A, at 6-month follow-up compared with baseline, the spectral components in the frequency domain HRV parameters, showed an increase in normalized high frequency power (nHF) (t = 2.99, p = 0.009), a decrease in the normalized low frequency power (nLF) (t = 2.98, p = 0.009) and in the LF/HF ratio (t = 3.13, p = 0.006). In subgroup B, the comparison of the spectral components in the frequency domain HRV parameters, at 13-month follow-up compared with baseline, showed an increase in nHF (t = 2.54, p = 0.02); a decrease in nLF (t = 2.62, p = 0.01) and in the LF/HF ratio (t = 4.00, p = 0.0003). In subgroup-C, at both 6 and 13-month follow-ups, the spectral components in the frequency domain HRV parameters were higher than baseline in nHF (t = 2.64, p = 0.02 and (t = 2.13, p = 0.05, respectively); lower in nLF (t = 2.64, p = 0.02 and (t = 2.13, p = 0.05, respectively), and in LF/HF (t = 1.92, p = 0.08 and (t = 2.43, p = 0.03, respectively). A significant proportion of HCWs reported persistent COVID-19 symptoms at both the 6 and 13-month follow-ups, seemingly unrelated to cardiac autonomic balance. In group 2 HCWs, at 1-month follow-up compared with baseline, the spectral components in the frequency domain HRV parameters, showed a decrease in nHF (t = 2.19, p = 0.04); an increase in nLF (t = 2.15, p = 0.04) and in LF/HF (t = 3.49, p = 0.002). Conclusion: These results are consistent with epidemiological data suggesting a higher risk of acute cardiovascular complications during the first 30 days after COVID-19. The SARS-CoV-2 associated autonomic imbalance in the post-acute phase after recovery of mild COVID-19 resolved 6 months after the first negative SARS-CoV-2 NPS. However, a significant proportion of HCWs reported long-term COVID-19 symptoms, which dot not seems to be related to cardiac autonomic balance. Future research should certainly further test whether autonomic imbalance has a role in the mechanisms of long-COVID syndrome.

Effectiveness of early pharmaceutical interventions in symptomatic COVID-19 patients: A randomized clinical trial.

Objective: We assessed the effectiveness of oral Hydroxychloroquine (HC), Azithromycin (AZ) and Oseltamivir (OS), alone or combined, among patients hospitalized with mildly symptomatic coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19). Methods: Following the approval of the National Bioethics Committee and prospective registration (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04338698), a multicenter randomized clinical trial of adaptive design was conducted at 10 multispecialty hospitals in Pakistan. Patients were randomized into seven treatment groups. Starting April 15, 2020, consenting, eligible, otherwise healthy adult patients or those with co-morbidities under control, were recruited if they presented with mildly symptomatic COVID-19 (scored 3 on a 7-point ordinal scale anchored between 1 = not hospitalized, able to undertake normal activities, to 7 = death) confirmed by quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR). Two primary outcomes were assessed by day seven: Turning qRT-PCR negative; and clinical improvement of two points from the baseline. Outcome rates were compared using a chi-square test. Multiple imputations were applied to handle missing data. An interim data analysis was carried out on July 19, 2020, following which the study continued without treatment group changes. Data Safety and Monitoring Board advised to stop recruitment due to its futility on January 18, 2021. Results: Of 471 patients randomized, a total of 426 (90.4%) completed the follow-up for primary outcomes. Based on imputed data analyses at day seven: Total qRT-PCR negative cases were 137/471 (29%, 95% CI 25.0 - 33.4). By day seven, a total of 111/471 (23.5%, 95% CI 19.8 - 27.6) showed clinical improvement. No serious or non-serious adverse event was reported. Conclusions: Among patients with mild COVID-19, there was no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of oral antimalarial, antiviral, or antibiotic treatments.Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04338698.

Plasma Exchange for Refractory Pruritus Due to Drug-Induced Chronic Cholestasis Following Azithromycin Misuse in COVID-19 Infection.

Azithromycin can result in severe cholestatic liver disease. We describe two cases of intractable pruritus secondary to drug-induced cholestatic liver injury, unresponsive to symptomatic medical therapy, necessitating and responding well to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). The first is a case of a 60-year-old male known to have stable chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and benign prostatic hyperplasia, and the second is a 46-year-old female known to have primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) who presented at six weeks and two weeks, respectively, post-mild-COVID-19 pneumonia. Their drug histories were positive for over-the-counter (OCT) azithromycin use during the COVID-19 pneumonia period. They presented with a two-week history of severe itching, associated with sleep deprivation and impaired quality of life. Liver function tests revealed a cholestatic pattern of liver injury. Pruritus remained refractory to multiple lines of treatment including bile acid sequestrants and antihistamines. Rapid and long-lasting relief of the patient's symptoms was observed after three sessions of TPE. Our cases highlight medically recalcitrant cholestatic pruritus as an adverse effect of antibiotic misuse during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Sustained symptomatic improvements were seen after TPE.

Efficacy and Safety of Ensitrelvir for Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19: An Exploratory Analysis of a Multicenter, Randomized, Phase 2b/3 Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: This phase 2b/3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial explored the efficacy and evaluated the safety of ensitrelvir. This trial involved individuals with asymptomatic infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and patients with mild symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: The trial was conducted at 57 medical institutions in Japan, South Korea, and Vietnam (study period: January 6-August 14, 2022). Eligible participants were randomized (1:1:1) to the ensitrelvir 125-mg, ensitrelvir 250-mg, or placebo group, received the allocated intervention orally, and were followed up until Day 28. Participants self-rated the severity of 14 typical COVID-19 symptoms and recorded the data in an electronic diary. RESULTS: In total, 572 participants (194, 189, and 189 in the ensitrelvir 125-mg, ensitrelvir 250-mg, and placebo groups, respectively) were included in the intention-to-treat population. Ensitrelvir 125-mg group observed a 77% reduction in the risk of developing any of the 14 COVID-19 symptoms or fever and a 29% reduction in the risk of worsening of such symptoms or fever versus placebo (statistically nonsignificant). The viral RNA, viral titer, and time to infectious viral clearance observed a statistically significant decrease versus placebo. Most treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs) were mild to moderate in severity, and the most common TEAE observed across groups was a decrease in high-density lipoprotein. CONCLUSIONS: Our exploratory results suggest a potential reduction in the risk of development or worsening of COVID-19 symptoms with ensitrelvir. Ensitrelvir showed antiviral efficacy and was well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: jRCT2031210350.

EEG signatures of cognitive decline after mild SARS-CoV-2 infection: an age-dependent study.

BACKGROUND: Current research on the neurological impact of SARS-CoV-2 primarily focuses on the elderly or severely ill individuals. This study aims to explore the diverse neurological consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection, with a particular focus on mildly affected children and adolescents. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted to collect pre- and post-infection resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) data from 185 participants and 181 structured questionnaires of long-term symptoms across four distinct age groups. The goal was to comprehensively evaluate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on these different age demographics. The study analyzed EEG changes of SARS-CoV-2 by potential biomarkers across age groups using both spatial and temporal approaches. RESULTS: Spatial analysis indicated that children and adolescents exhibit smaller changes in brain network and microstate patterns post-infection, implying a milder cognitive impact. Sequential linear analyses showed that SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a marked rise in low-complexity, synchronized neural activity within low-frequency EEG bands. This is evidenced by a significant increase in Hjorth activity within the theta band and Hjorth mobility in the delta band. Sequential nonlinear analysis indicated a significant reduction in the Hurst exponent across all age groups, pointing to increased chaos and complexity within the cognitive system following infection. Furthermore, linear regression analysis based on questionnaires established a significant positive relationship between the magnitude of changes in these neural indicators and the persistence of long-term symptoms post-infection. CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the enduring neurological impacts of SARS-CoV-2 infection, marked by cognitive decline and increased EEG disarray. Although children and adolescents experienced milder effects, cognitive decline and heightened low-frequency electrical activity were evident. These observations might contribute to understanding potential anxiety, insomnia, and neurodevelopmental implications.