Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 235
Filtrar
1.
Adv Rheumatol ; 64(1): 58, 2024 Aug 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39135131

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs) have been prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination to mitigate the infection severity risks. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at a high risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, especially those under immunosuppression or with associated comorbidities. However, few studies have assessed the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine in patients with RA. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with RA. METHODS: This data are from the study "Safety and Efficacy on COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Diseases," a Brazilian multicentric prospective phase IV study to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine in IMRDs in Brazil. Adverse events (AEs) in patients with RA of all centers were assessed after two doses of ChAdOx1 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) or CoronaVac (Sinovac/Butantan). Stratification of postvaccination AEs was performed using a diary, filled out daily and returned at the end of 28 days for each dose. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients with RA were include, 90% female. CoronaVac was used in 109 patients and ChAdOx1 in 79. Only mild AEs were observed, mainly after the first dose. The most common AEs after the first dose were pain at the injection (46,7%), headache (39,4%), arthralgia (39,4%), myalgia (30,5%) and fatigue (26,6%), and ChAdOx1 had a higher frequency of pain at the injection (66% vs 32 %, p < 0.001) arthralgia (62% vs 22%, p < 0.001) and myalgia (45% vs 20%, p < 0.001) compared to CoronaVac. The more common AEs after the second dose were pain at the injection (37%), arthralgia (31%), myalgia (23%), headache (21%) and fatigue (18%). Arthralgia (41,4% vs 25%, p = 0.02) and pain at injection (51,4% vs 27%, p = 0.001) were more common with ChAdOx1. No serious AEs were related. With Regard to RA activity level, no significant difference was observed between the three time periods for both COVID-19 vaccines. CONCLUSION: In the comparison between the two immunizers in patients with RA, local reactions and musculoskeletal symptoms were more frequent with ChAdOx1 than with CoronaVac, especially after the first dose. In summary, the AE occurred mainly after the first dose, and were mild, like previous data from others immunizing agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Vaccination did not worsen the degree of disease activity.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Humanos , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Feminino , Masculino , Brasil/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/complicações , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Idoso , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Cefaleia/etiologia , Mialgia/induzido quimicamente , Mialgia/etiologia , Artralgia/etiologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados
2.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 58(8): 1252-1255, 2024 Aug 06.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39142897

RESUMO

In order to understand the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of vaccination against influenza, pneumonia, human papillomavirus (HPV), herpes zoster (HZ), COVID-19, and hepatitis B among staff of vaccination units in Shandong Province, a sample survey was conducted among 797 staffs of adult vaccination units in 12 counties (cities and districts) of Shandong Province from August to September 2022. The results showed that the respondents had the highest total score of knowledge and attitude for the COVID-19 vaccine, with the M (Q1, Q3) of 23 (20, 25) and 10 (10, 10), respectively, and had the lowest score of knowledge and attitude for the herpes zoster vaccine, with the M (Q1, Q3) of 19 (15, 22) and 8 (8, 10), respectively. The vaccine-related knowledge point"vaccine applicable population"had the highest score, with the M (Q1,Q3) of 26 (23, 30). The "contraindications/adverse reactions" and "adverse reaction management" had the lowest score, with the M (Q1, Q3) of 24 (20, 29) and 24 (20, 28), respectively. About 89.71% of respondents received one adult vaccine within two years at least. The principal driver for vaccination of 53.58% of recipients was their understanding of vaccines, which was"it was necessary to receive the vaccine". About 66.00% of respondents who had not received any adult vaccine in the past two years had insufficient awareness of the necessity of vaccination and believed that they were in good health and did not need to receive it. In summary, the staff of adult vaccination units in Shandong Province have a poor understanding of the herpes zoster vaccine in terms of vaccines and a relatively poor understanding of"contraindications/adverse reaction and management"in adult vaccination knowledge points.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Vacinação , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/psicologia , Adulto , China , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinas contra Influenza
3.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0299844, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626045

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Australian Government implemented a national vaccination campaign against COVID-19 beginning February 22, 2021. The roll-out was criticised for being delayed relative to many high-income countries, but high levels of vaccination coverage were belatedly achieved. The large-scale Omicron outbreak in January 2022 resulted in a massive number of cases and deaths, although mortality would have been far higher if not for vigorous efforts to rapidly vaccinate the entire population. The impact of the vaccination coverage was assessed over this extended period. METHODS: We considered NSW, as the Australian jurisdiction with the highest quality data for our purposes and which still reflected the national experience. Weekly death rates were derived among individuals aged 50+ with respect to vaccine status between August 8, 2021 and July 9, 2022. We evaluated deaths averted by the vaccination campaign by modelling alternative counterfactual scenarios based on a simple data-driven modelling methodology presented by Jia et al. (2023). FINDINGS: Unvaccinated individuals had a 7.7-fold greater mortality rate than those who were fully vaccinated among people aged 50+, which rose to 11.2-fold in those who had received a booster dose. If NSW had fully vaccinated its ~2.9 million 50+ residents earlier (by July 28, 2021), only 440 of the total 3,495 observed 50+ deaths would have been averted. Up to July 9, 2022, the booster campaign prevented 1,860 deaths. In the absence of a vaccination campaign, ~21,250 COVID-19 50+ deaths (conservative estimate) could have been expected in NSW i.e., some 6 times the actual total. We also find the methodology of Jia et al. (2023) can sometimes significantly underestimate that actual number. INTERPRETATION: The Australian vaccination campaign was successful in reducing mortality over 2022, relative to alternative hypothetical vaccination scenarios. The success was attributable to the Australian public's high levels of engagement with vaccination in the face of new SARS-COV-2 variants, and because high levels of vaccination coverage (full and booster) were achieved in the period shortly before the major Omicron outbreak of 2022.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Austrália/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Análise por Conglomerados , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Programas de Imunização , Vacinação
4.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 24(6): 581-593, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38460525

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 variants evade immunity despite vaccination with prototype COVID-19 vaccines or previous infection. The 2019nCoV-311 (part 2) study is evaluating immune responses after two booster doses of a vaccine containing the omicron BA.5 subvariant spike protein in adults previously vaccinated with a prototype mRNA vaccine. This interim analysis reports on day 28 immunogenicity and safety outcomes after one booster dose. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomised, observer-blinded study conducted at 35 sites in Australia, medically stable, previously COVID-19-vaccinated (mRNA-based; ≥three doses) adults aged 18 years or older were enrolled and randomly allocated (1:1:1; via an interactive web response system) to receive two doses of bivalent (NVX-CoV2373 + NVX-CoV2540; bivalent group), authorised prototype (NVX-CoV2373; prototype group), or BA.5 (NVX-CoV2540; BA.5 group) vaccine. Only blinded personnel performed study assessments or had participant contact to collect data after study vaccination. Participants received vaccines containing 5 µg SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein and 50 µg Matrix-M adjuvant, administered via a 0·5 mL intramuscular injection (2·5 µg of NVX-CoV2373 plus 2·5 µg of NVX-CoV2540 for the bivalent vaccine, prepared on-site as a 1:1 mixture). The coprimary endpoints include day 28 neutralising antibody geometric mean titre (GMT) ratios (GMTRs) to omicron BA.5 and the ancestral strain, and seroresponse rates to BA.5, in the bivalent and prototype groups. These endpoints were calculated in the per-protocol analysis set, which was defined as participants who had received a vaccine dose, had baseline and day 28 immunogenicity data, and were PCR-negative for SARS-CoV-2, with no major protocol deviations. The primary objective was to determine the primary outcome (antibody responses), which consisted of three comparisons: superiority of the bivalent versus prototype vaccine for neutralising antibody GMT to BA.5 (ie, lower bound of the GMTR 95% CI >1·0); non-inferiority of neutralising antibody seroresponse rate to BA.5 (ie, lower bound of the seroresponse rate 95% CI >-5%); and non-inferiority of neutralising antibody GMT to the ancestral strain (ie, lower bound of GMTR 95% CI >0·67). This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT05372588. FINDINGS: Between March 22, 2023 and May 2, 2023, 837 participants were screened for eligibility and 766 were randomly allocated to receive the BA.5 (n=255), prototype (n=252), or bivalent (n=259) vaccine. After accounting for exclusions due to participants being baseline SARS-CoV-2-positive, having previous infection, or protocol deviations, the per-protocol analysis set included 694 participants (236 in BA.5 group, 227 in prototype group, and 231 in bivalent group). In this interim analysis (maximum follow-up 35 days after the first dose), the bivalent group, compared with the prototype group, had superior neutralising antibody responses to BA.5 (GMT 1017·8 [95% CI 891·0-1162·6] vs 515·1 [450·4-589·0]; GMTR 2·0 [1·69-2·33]) and a non-inferior seroresponse rate to BA.5 at day 28 (39·8% [33·5-46·5] vs 12·3% [8·4-17·3]; difference 27·5% [19·8-35·0]). The bivalent group also had non-inferior neutralising antibody responses to the ancestral strain (GMTR 1·0 [0·84-1·20]), compared with the prototype group. All vaccines were similarly well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: All three coprimary endpoints were met in part 2 of the ongoing 2019nCoV-311 study. These data support the development of monovalent and/or bivalent vaccines for the most currently circulating variants, to optimise protection. With no new safety findings, further investigation of omicron-based subvariant vaccines is supported by the evidence. FUNDING: Novavax.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Imunização Secundária , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Masculino , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Feminino , Imunização Secundária/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Austrália , Adulto Jovem
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(3): e241838, 2024 Mar 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38470419

RESUMO

Importance: COVID-19 pandemic-related disruptions to the health care system may have resulted in increased mortality for patients with time-sensitive conditions. Objective: To examine whether in-hospital mortality in hospitalizations not related to COVID-19 (non-COVID-19 stays) for time-sensitive conditions changed during the pandemic and how it varied by hospital urban vs rural location. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was an interrupted time-series analysis to assess in-hospital mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 8, 2020, to December 31, 2021) compared with the prepandemic period (January 1, 2017, to March 7, 2020) overall, by month, and by community COVID-19 transmission level for adult discharges from 3813 US hospitals in the State Inpatient Databases for the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Exposure: The COVID-19 pandemic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality among non-COVID-19 stays for 6 time-sensitive medical conditions: acute myocardial infarction, hip fracture, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, pneumonia, sepsis, and stroke. Entropy weights were used to align patient characteristics in the 2 time periods by age, sex, and comorbidities. Results: There were 18 601 925 hospitalizations; 50.3% of patients were male, 38.5% were aged 18 to 64 years, 45.0% were aged 65 to 84 years, and 16.4% were 85 years or older for the selected time-sensitive medical conditions from 2017 through 2021. The odds of in-hospital mortality for sepsis increased 27% from the prepandemic to the pandemic periods at urban hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.25-1.29) and 35% at rural hospitals (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.30-1.40). In-hospital mortality for pneumonia had similar increases at urban (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.42-1.54) and rural (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.36-1.57) hospitals. Increases in mortality for these 2 conditions showed a dose-response association with the community COVID-19 level (low vs high COVID-19 burden) for both rural (sepsis: 22% vs 54%; pneumonia: 30% vs 66%) and urban (sepsis: 16% vs 28%; pneumonia: 34% vs 61%) hospitals. The odds of mortality for acute myocardial infarction increased 9% (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.06-1.12) at urban hospitals and was responsive to the community COVID-19 level. There were significant increases in mortality for hip fracture at rural hospitals (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.53) and for gastrointestinal hemorrhage at urban hospitals (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.09-1.21). No significant change was found in mortality for stroke overall. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, in-hospital mortality for time-sensitive conditions increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mobilizing strategies tailored to the different needs of urban and rural hospitals may help reduce the likelihood of excess deaths during future public health crises.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Fraturas do Quadril , Infarto do Miocárdio , Sepse , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Hospitais Rurais , Pandemias , Estudos de Coortes , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal
6.
Vaccine ; 42(10): 2585-2591, 2024 Apr 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38480100

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Identify characteristics of healthcare personnel (HCP) who did not have timely initiation of the COVID-19 primary series, as well as HCP who did not receive a booster vaccine. METHODS: Characteristics of HCP enrolled in a COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness study between 12/28/2020-12/01/2022 were compared by timing of receipt of 1st mRNA dose, and by receipt of a booster dose. Data for this retrospective cohort analysis came from HCP working at a large healthcare system in Monroe County, New York, and included standardized questionnaires and verified vaccination status. HCP were categorized by whether they received their 1stmRNA COVID-19 vaccine between 12/14/2020-03/30/2021 (earlier) or 04/01/2021-09/28/2021 (later) based on timing of local vaccine eligibility and mandates, and by whether they received a 3rdmRNA booster dose by 12/01/22. Logistic regression models were run to identify characteristics of HCP who had later 1stdose receipt or did not receive a booster. RESULTS: 3,375 HCP were enrolled. Of these, 86.8 % had early initiation of their 1stCOVID-19 vaccine, and 85.0 % received a booster dose. Low education, low household income, younger age (<50), non-White race and public health insurance were all significant predictors of later receipt of 1stdose and lack of uptake of a booster. However, advanced professional role was only found to be a significant predictor of early 1stdose receipt. CONCLUSIONS: Continual monitoring of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among HCP to identify those less likely to receive new booster doses will be crucial to support targeted vaccine campaigns in this important population.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , New York , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Cognição , Vacinação
7.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 24(6): 639-649, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408457

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dengue is highly prevalent in Asia and Latin America and has no specific dengue antiviral treatment. A recombinant monoclonal antibody (VIS513) that neutralises all four serotypes of the dengue virus has been developed in India. After confirmation of safety and efficacy in preclinical studies, it was tested in a first-in-human study to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics. METHODS: This was a partially blind (observer-blind), randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1, single ascending dose study in Australia. Participants were dengue naive, healthy adults (aged 18-45 years) with no clinically significant disorders or immunosuppressive conditions. Four dose levels of dengue monoclonal antibody (ie, 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, and 12 mg/kg; n=4 for 1 mg/kg and n=10 each for 3 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, and 12 mg/kg doses) were assessed in a dose-ascending way with a placebo control (n=2 for each dose cohort, total n=6) for each cohort except for 1 mg/kg. Within each cohort, participants were first randomly assigned (1:1) in a sentinel sub-cohort and then randomly assigned (9:1) in an expansion sub-cohort to dengue monoclonal antibody or placebo except for the 1 mg/kg cohort. Participants, investigators, and outcome assessors were masked and treatment administrators were not masked. 40 participants received a single intravenous injection or infusion of either dengue monoclonal antibody or placebo over a period of 3 min to 2 h and were followed up until day 85. The primary outcomes were proportion of participants with adverse events and serious adverse events (SAEs) up to 84 days after dosing whereas the secondary outcomes were to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of dengue monoclonal antibody and to assess the presence of anti-drug antibody (ADA) to dengue monoclonal antibody. All participants were included in the safety analysis and the pharmacokinetic population involved participants receiving dengue monoclonal antibody. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03883620. FINDINGS: Between March 22 and Dec 23, 2019, 40 healthy adults were randomly assigned and all completed the study. There were no SAEs reported. None of the placebo recipients (n=6) reported any adverse events. 31 (91%) of 34 participants receiving dengue monoclonal antibody reported 143 adverse events (1 mg/kg: four [100%] of four participants; 3 mg/kg: ten [100%] of ten participants; 7 mg/kg: seven [70%] of ten participants; 12 mg/kg: ten [100%] of ten participants). Of these 143 adverse events, 80 were treatment-related adverse events in 28 (82%) of 34 participants. Headache (16 [47%] of 34), infusion reaction (11 [32%] of 34), lymphopenia (seven [21%] of 34), fatigue (five [15%] of 34), and pyrexia (four [12%] of 34) were the most common reactions. Infusion reactions were reduced in the 7 mg/kg (two [20%] of ten participants) and 12 mg/kg (three [30%] of ten) cohorts with paracetamol premedication compared with the 3 mg/kg cohort (five [50%] of ten). The majority of adverse events were grade 1 or grade 2 in severity, and resolved completely. Median maximum serum concentrations ranged from 28 µg/mL (1 mg/kg) to 525 µg/mL (12 mg/kg). The median elimination half-life ranged from 775 h (1 mg/kg) to 878 h (12 mg/kg). No ADA against dengue monoclonal antibody was detected. INTERPRETATION: Dengue monoclonal antibody was safe and well tolerated. It showed a dose-proportionate increase in pharmacokinetic exposure. These data support further evaluation of dengue monoclonal antibody in patients with dengue for safety and efficacy. FUNDING: Serum Institute of India.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vírus da Dengue , Dengue , Humanos , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacocinética , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Masculino , Feminino , Austrália , Dengue/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto Jovem , Vírus da Dengue/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adolescente , Voluntários Saudáveis , Método Simples-Cego , Anticorpos Neutralizantes
8.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 10: e48466, 2024 Feb 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38363596

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Racialized populations in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Higher vaccine hesitancy has been reported among racial and ethnic minorities in some of these countries. In the United Kingdom, for example, higher vaccine hesitancy has been observed among the South Asian population and Black compared with the White population, and this has been attributed to lack of trust in government due to historical and ongoing racism and discrimination. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess vaccine receipt by ethnicity and its relationship with mistrust among ethnic groups in British Columbia (BC), Canada. METHODS: We included adults ≥18 years of age who participated in the BC COVID-19 Population Mixing Patterns Survey (BC-Mix) from March 8, 2021, to August 8, 2022. The survey included questions about vaccine receipt and beliefs based on a behavioral framework. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between mistrust in vaccines and vaccine receipt among ethnic groups. RESULTS: The analysis included 25,640 adults. Overall, 76.7% (22,010/28,696) of respondents reported having received at least 1 dose of COVID-19 vaccines (Chinese=86.1%, South Asian=79.6%, White=75.5%, and other ethnicity=73.2%). Overall, 13.7% (3513/25,640) of respondents reported mistrust of COVID-19 vaccines (Chinese=7.1%, South Asian=8.2%, White=15.4%, and other ethnicity=15.2%). In the multivariable model (adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, educational attainment, and household size), mistrust was associated with a 93% reduced odds of vaccine receipt (adjusted odds ratio 0.07, 95% CI 0.06-0.08). In the models stratified by ethnicity, mistrust was associated with 81%, 92%, 94%, and 95% reduced odds of vaccine receipt among South Asian, Chinese, White, and other ethnicities, respectively. Indecision, whether to trust the vaccine or not, was significantly associated with a 70% and 78% reduced odds of vaccine receipt among those who identified as White and of other ethnic groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine receipt among those who identified as South Asian and Chinese in BC was higher than that among the White population. Vaccine mistrust was associated with a lower odds of vaccine receipt in all ethnicities, but it had a lower effect on vaccine receipt among the South Asian and Chinese populations. Future research needs to focus on sources of mistrust to better understand its potential influence on vaccine receipt among visible minorities in Canada.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Hesitação Vacinal , Adulto , Humanos , Povo Asiático , Colúmbia Britânica/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Etnicidade , Confiança , População Branca
9.
J Health Popul Nutr ; 43(1): 8, 2024 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38221618

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Low immunization coverage in India attributes to many factors including sociodemographic factors and people's behavior. COVID-19 pandemic resulted in disruptions in achieving optimum availability and utilization of immunization services. This study was carried out to find out the immunization status of children in the post COVID era and various factors responsible for non-immunization during the pandemic. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included parents of 225 admitted children aged 1-6 years were interviewed using a semi-structured open-ended questionnaire. Children were classified as completely immunized, partially immunized and unimmunized on the basis of vaccines missed given under first year of life. Reasons for non-immunization and delay/missed vaccination during COVID-19 pandemic were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 225 children, 162 (72%; 95% CI 66-78%) were completely immunized, 55 (24.4%; 95% CI 19-30%) were partially immunized and 8 (3.6%; 95% CI 1-6%) were unimmunized. Parents with hospital deliveries, higher education level and lesser birth order were more likely to have children with better immunization status (p < 0.05). First dose of measles scheduled at 9 months and 3rd dose of pentavalent vaccine/OPV/Rotavirus vaccine scheduled at 14 weeks were most commonly missed vaccines among partially immunized. Lack of awareness (n = 36, 57.1%; 95% CI 45-70%) was the common reason for partial and non-immunization followed by illness of child (n = 21, 33.3%; 95% CI 21-45%) and COVID-19 pandemic (n = 11, 17.4%; 95% CI 8-27%). Pandemic was reason for delay in 50 (22.2%; 95% CI 17-28%) children. Restrictions of movement (64%; 95% CI 50-78%), fear of being exposed to COVID-19 (52%; 95% CI 38-66%) were the most common reasons for delay during the pandemic. Of the 50 children who had delay due to pandemic, 39 children (17.3%; 95% CI 12-22%) received their catch-up immunization after the pandemic. No child remained completely unimmunized due to COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Although COVID-19 pandemic resulted in disruptions in routine immunization services, sociodemographic factors such as awareness for immunization, parental education and various beliefs for immunization were responsible for the children remaining unimmunized or partially immunized after the pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Transversais , Pandemias , Centros de Atenção Terciária , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Imunização , Índia/epidemiologia , Programas de Imunização
10.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 68(3): e0138423, 2024 Mar 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38289075

RESUMO

Transplant patients face an elevated risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) morbidity and mortality and commonly encounter renal dysfunction. Nirmatrelvir is primarily excreted through the kidneys. The dosage of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR) needs to be adjusted according to the degree of renal function impairment. Nevertheless, NR is not recommended for patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min) due to a dearth of associated research. In this study, we focus on kidney transplant patients and document and analyze the experiences of using NR in individuals with severe kidney dysfunction. This was a retrospective multicenter study that included transplant recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 in five major tertiary hospitals in China from December 2022 to June 2023. The outcomes consisted of the disease progression rate by day 28, individual disease progression events, safety outcomes, information on adverse events (AEs), and the blood drug concentrations of immunosuppressants. Data were presented with descriptive statistics. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 22. In total, 40 patients were included in the analysis. Considering the potential interaction between drugs, all patients temporarily discontinued their immunosuppressants during the NR treatment. None of the 32 moderate patients experienced disease progression. However, among the eight patients with critical COVID-19, unfortunately, two of them died. During the medication period, four patients experienced a total of six AEs associated with NR. None of them experienced AEs with a maximum grade of ≥3. Blood drug concentrations of immunosuppressants were monitored in 22 of 40 patients, and the blood drug concentrations of immunosuppressants did not show a significant increase, but some patients experienced lower blood drug concentrations. Our findings supported the use of NR therapy for the treatment of COVID-19 in transplant patients with severe renal insufficiency. A modified dose of NR was well-tolerated.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Rim , Insuficiência Renal , Humanos , Transplantados , Ritonavir/efeitos adversos , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Rim , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Progressão da Doença , Antivirais/efeitos adversos
11.
Lancet ; 403(10424): 365-378, 2024 Jan 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224710

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of daily co-trimoxazole, an antifolate used for malaria chemoprevention in pregnant women living with HIV, is threatened by cross-resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to the antifolate sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. We assessed whether addition of monthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine to daily co-trimoxazole is more effective at preventing malaria infection than monthly placebo plus daily co-trimoxazole in pregnant women living with HIV. METHODS: We did an individually randomised, two-arm, placebo-controlled trial in areas with high-grade sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance in Kenya and Malawi. Pregnant women living with HIV on dolutegravir-based combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) who had singleton pregnancies between 16 weeks' and 28 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated block randomisation, stratified by site and HIV status (known positive vs newly diagnosed), to daily co-trimoxazole plus monthly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (three tablets of 40 mg dihydroartemisinin and 320 mg piperaquine given daily for 3 days) or daily co-trimoxazole plus monthly placebo. Daily co-trimoxazole consisted of one tablet of 160 mg sulfamethoxazole and 800 mg trimethoprim. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Plasmodium infection detected in the peripheral (maternal) or placental (maternal) blood or tissue by PCR, microscopy, rapid diagnostic test, or placental histology (active infection) from 2 weeks after the first dose of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine or placebo to delivery. Log-binomial regression was used for binary outcomes, and Poisson regression for count outcomes. The primary analysis was by modified intention to treat, consisting of all randomised eligible participants with primary endpoint data. The safety analysis included all women who received at least one dose of study drug. All investigators, laboratory staff, data analysts, and participants were masked to treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04158713. FINDINGS: From Nov 11, 2019, to Aug 3, 2021, 904 women were enrolled and randomly assigned to co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (n=448) or co-trimoxazole plus placebo (n=456), of whom 895 (99%) contributed to the primary analysis (co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, n=443; co-trimoxazole plus placebo, n=452). The cumulative risk of any malaria infection during pregnancy or delivery was lower in the co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group than in the co-trimoxazole plus placebo group (31 [7%] of 443 women vs 70 [15%] of 452 women, risk ratio 0·45, 95% CI 0·30-0·67; p=0·0001). The incidence of any malaria infection during pregnancy or delivery was 25·4 per 100 person-years in the co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group versus 77·3 per 100 person-years in the co-trimoxazole plus placebo group (incidence rate ratio 0·32, 95% CI 0·22-0·47, p<0·0001). The number needed to treat to avert one malaria infection per pregnancy was 7 (95% CI 5-10). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar between groups in mothers (17·7 per 100 person-years in the co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group [23 events] vs 17·8 per 100 person-years in the co-trimoxazole group [25 events]) and infants (45·4 per 100 person-years [23 events] vs 40·2 per 100 person-years [21 events]). Nausea within the first 4 days after the start of treatment was reported by 29 (7%) of 446 women in the co-trimoxazole plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group versus 12 (3%) of 445 women in the co-trimoxazole plus placebo group. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: Addition of monthly intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine to the standard of care with daily unsupervised co-trimoxazole in areas of high antifolate resistance substantially improves malaria chemoprevention in pregnant women living with HIV on dolutegravir-based cART and should be considered for policy. FUNDING: European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership 2; UK Joint Global Health Trials Scheme (UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; Medical Research Council; National Institute for Health Research; Wellcome); and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos , Artemisininas , Antagonistas do Ácido Fólico , Infecções por HIV , Malária , Piperazinas , Quinolinas , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Gravidez , Antimaláricos/efeitos adversos , Quimioprevenção , Antagonistas do Ácido Fólico/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Quênia/epidemiologia , Malária/epidemiologia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Malaui/epidemiologia , Placenta , Resultado da Gravidez , Gestantes , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego
12.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 24(2): 150-160, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37776876

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality from dengue virus (DENV) is rapidly growing in the large populations of south Asia. Few formal evaluations of candidate dengue vaccine candidates have been undertaken in India, Pakistan, or Bangladesh. Tetravalent vaccines must be tested for safety and immunogenicity in all age groups and in those previously exposed and naive to DENV infections. TV005 is a live, attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a single dose of TV005 across age groups in dengue-endemic Bangladesh. METHODS: We performed a randomised, placebo-controlled age de-escalating clinical trial of TV005 at a single clinical site in dengue-endemic Dhaka, Bangladesh, following a technology transfer from the USA. Healthy (as determined by history, clinical examination, and safety laboratory test results) volunteers aged 1-50 years were randomly assigned 3:1 (stratified by four age groups) to receive a single dose of TV005 vaccine or placebo. Participants were followed up for 3 years. The study was double blind and was unmasked at day 180; outcome assessors, clinic staff, and volunteers remained blind throughout. Primary outcomes were safety, evaluated per-protocol as proportion of volunteers with solicited related adverse events of any severity through 28 days post dosing, and post-vaccination seropositivity by day 180 using serotype-specific neutralising antibodies (PRNT50 ≥10). Secondary outcomes included viremia, impact of past dengue exposure, and durability of antibody responses. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02678455, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between March 13, 2016, and Feb 14, 2017, 192 volunteers were enrolled into four age groups (adults [18-50 years; 20 male and 28 female], adolescents [11-17 years; 27 male and 21 female], children [5-10 years; 15 male and 33 female], and young children [1-4 years; 29 male and 19 female]) with 48 participant per group. All participants were Bangladeshi. Vaccination was well tolerated and most adverse events were mild. Rash was the most common vaccine-associated solicited adverse event, in 37 (26%) of 144 vaccine recipients versus six (12%) of 48 placebo recipients; followed by fever in seven (5% of 144) and arthralgias in seven (6% of 108), which were only observed in vaccine recipients. Post-vaccine, volunteers of all ages (n=142) were seropositive to most serotypes with 118 (83%) seropositive to DENV 1, 141 (99%) to DENV 2, 137 (96%) to DENV 3, and 124 (87%) to DENV 4, overall by day 180. Post-vaccination, viraemia was not consistently found and antibody titres were higher (10-15-fold for DENV 1-3 and 1·6-fold for DENV 4) in individuals with past dengue exposure compared with the dengue-naive participants (DENV 1 mean 480 [SD 4·0] vs 32 [2·4], DENV 2 1042 [3·2] vs 105 [3·1], DENV 3 1406 [2·8] vs 129 [4·7], and DENV 4 105 [3·3] vs 65 [3·1], respectively). Antibody titres to all serotypes remained stable in most adults (63-86%) after 3 years of follow-up. However, as expected for individuals without past exposure to dengue, titres for DENV 1, 3, and 4 waned by 3 years in the youngest (1-4 year old) cohort (69% seropositive for DENV 2 and 22-28% seropositive for DENV 1, 3, and 4). INTERPRETATION: With 3 years of follow-up, the single-dose tetravalent dengue vaccine, TV005, was well tolerated and immunogenic for all four serotypes in young children to adults, including individuals with no previous dengue exposure. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Intramural Research Program and Johns Hopkins University. TRANSLATION: For the Bangla translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Dengue , Vírus da Dengue , Dengue , Adulto , Criança , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Sorogrupo , Bangladesh , Vacinas Atenuadas , Método Duplo-Cego , Viremia , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Anticorpos Antivirais
13.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; 13(1): 2292068, 2024 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38054302

RESUMO

Current clinical guidelines support the concomitant administration of seasonal influenza vaccines and COVID-19 mRNA boosters vaccine. Whether dual vaccination may impact vaccine immunogenicity due to an interference between influenza or SARS-CoV-2 antigens is unknown. We aimed to understand the impact of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines administered concomitantly on the immune response to influenza vaccines. For this, 128 volunteers were vaccinated during the 22-23 influenza season. Three groups of vaccination were assembled: FLU vaccine only (46, 35%) versus volunteers that received the mRNA bivalent COVID-19 vaccines concomitantly to seasonal influenza vaccines, FluCOVID vaccine in the same arm (42, 33%) or different arm (40, 31%), respectively. Sera and whole blood were obtained the day of vaccination, +7, and +28 days after for antibody and T cells response quantification. As expected, side effects were increased in individuals who received the FluCOVID vaccine as compared to FLU vaccine only based on the known reactogenicity of mRNA vaccines. In general, antibody levels were high at 4 weeks post-vaccination and differences were found only for the H3N2 virus when administered in different arms compared to the other groups at day 28 post-vaccination. Additionally, our data showed that subjects that received the FluCOVID vaccine in different arm tended to have better antibody induction than those receiving FLU vaccines for H3N2 virus in the absence of pre-existing immunity. Furthermore, no notable differences in the influenza-specific cellular immune response were found for any of the vaccination groups. Our data supports the concomitant administration of seasonal influenza and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Humanos , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2 , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinas de mRNA , Estações do Ano , Vacinação
14.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 896, 2023 Dec 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38124031

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Currently, some meta-analyses on COVID-19 have suggested that glucocorticoids use can reduce the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients, utilization rate of invasive ventilation, and improve the prognosis of patients. However, optimal regimen and dosages of glucocorticoid remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this network meta-analysis is to analyze the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids in treating COVID-19 at regimens. METHODS: This meta-analysis retrieved randomized controlled trials from the earliest records to December 30, 2022, published in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI Database and Wanfang Database, which compared glucocorticoids with placebos for their efficacy and safety in the treatment of COVID-19, Effects of different treatment regimens, types and dosages (high-dose methylprednisolone, very high-dose methylprednisolone, Pulse therapy methylprednisolone, medium-dose hydrocortisone, high-dose hydrocortisone, high-dose dexamethasone, very high-dose dexamethasone and placebo) on 28-day all-caused hospitalization mortality, hospitalization duration, mechanical ventilation requirement, ICU admission and safety outcome were compared. RESULTS: In this network meta-analysis, a total of 10,544 patients from 19 randomized controlled trials were finally included, involving a total of 9 glucocorticoid treatment regimens of different types and dosages. According to the analysis results, the 28-day all-cause mortality rate was the lowest in the treatment with pulse therapy methylprednisolone (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.02, 0.42), but the use of high-dose methylprednisolone (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.59, 1.22), very high-dose dexamethasone (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.67, 1.35), high-dose hydrocortisone (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.34, 1.22), medium-dose hydrocortisone (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.49, 1.31) showed no benefit in prolonging the 28-day survival of patient. Compared with placebo, the treatment with very high-dose methylprednisolone (MD = -3.09;95%CI: -4.10, -2.08) had the shortest length of hospital stay, while high-dose dexamethasone (MD = -1.55;95%CI: -3.13,0.03) and very high-dose dexamethasone (MD = -1.06;95%CI: -2.78,0.67) did not benefit patients in terms of length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the available evidence, this network meta­analysis suggests that the prognostic impact of glucocorticoids in patients with COVID-19 may depend on the regimens of glucocorticoids. It is suggested that pulse therapy methylprednisolone is associated with lower 28-day all-cause mortality, very high-dose methylprednisolone had the shortest length of hospital stay in patients with COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022350407 (22/08/2022).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Glucocorticoides , Humanos , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Hidrocortisona/uso terapêutico , Metanálise em Rede , Metilprednisolona/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico
15.
PLoS One ; 18(12): e0295838, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38157348

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anakinra and tocilizumab are used for severe Covid-19, but only one previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) has studied both. We performed a multi-center RCT comparing anakinra or tocilizumab versus usual care (UC) for adults at high risk of deterioration. METHODS: The study was conducted June 2020 to March 2021. Eligibility required ≥ 5 liters/minute of Oxygen to maintain peripheral oxygen saturation at ≥ 93%, CRP > 70 mg/L, ferritin > 500 µg/L and at least two points where one point was awarded for lymphocytes < 1x 109/L; D-dimer ≥ 0.5 mg/L and; lactate dehydrogenase ≥ 8 microkatal/L. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive either a single dose of tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) or anakinra 100 mg IV QID for seven days or UC alone. The primary outcome was time to recovery. RESULTS: Recruitment was ended prematurely when tocilizumab became part of usual care. Out of a planned 195 patients, 77 had been randomized, 27 to UC, 28 to anakinra and 22 to tocilizumab. Median time to recovery was 15, 15 and 11 days. Rate ratio for recovery for UC vs anakinra was 0.91, 0.47 to 1.78, 95% [CI], p = 0.8 and for UC vs tocilizumab 1.13, 0.55 to 2.30; p = 0.7. There were non-significant trends favoring tocilizumab (and to limited degree anakinra) vs UC for some secondary outcomes. Safety profiles did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Premature closure of trial precludes firm conclusions. Anakinra or tocilizumab did not significantly shorten time to clinical recovery compared to usual care. (IMMCoVA, NCT04412291, EudraCT: 2020-00174824).


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Proteína Antagonista do Receptor de Interleucina 1/efeitos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Hospitais , Resultado do Tratamento
16.
Am J Case Rep ; 24: e941621, 2023 Nov 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37941318

RESUMO

BACKGROUND Minimal change disease is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. There are few reported cases of vaccine-related podocytopathy with nephrotic-range proteinuria in the setting of a minimal change disease history. There have been rare reports of acute renal damage following vaccination to prevent COVID-19 and some cases of exacerbation of ongoing nephropathy. This report is a 33-year-old man with a 22-year history of nephrotic syndrome due to minimal change disease which exacerbated following a third dose of an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for COVID-19. CASE REPORT We report a case of nephrotic syndrome after the third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The patient presented with mild edema in the bilateral lower extremities and sacrum. Laboratory investigations confirmed nephrotic-range proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia. A kidney sonogram demonstrated mild renal parenchymal disease and a small non-obstructing right renal calculus. Renal biopsy revealed diffuse podocyte foot process effacement, punctuate IgG podocyte cytoplasmic staining, and minimal global glomerulosclerosis, consistent with a diagnosis of a diffuse podocytopathy with a minimal change disease phenotype. The patient was started on oral prednisone treatment, which led to remission of his symptoms and normalization of lab test results with normal BUN and Cr and resolution of proteinuria. Treatment was tapered off over the course of 28 weeks. CONCLUSIONS We presents a case of longstanding minimal change disease that showed exacerbation following a third dose of an mRNA vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. Although this may be a rare association, this case supports that patients with chronic glomerulonephritis need to be monitored.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Nefropatias , Nefrose Lipoide , Síndrome Nefrótica , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/complicações , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Nefropatias/complicações , Nefrose Lipoide/diagnóstico , Nefrose Lipoide/etiologia , Síndrome Nefrótica/complicações , Proteinúria , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
17.
Complement Med Res ; 30(6): 471-480, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37952513

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of Eupatorium perfoliatum (EP) 30C on the incidence of dengue fever and acute febrile illness (AFI) during the 2017 dengue outbreak. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open-label, community-based parallel cohort study involving apparently healthy individuals residing in 06 urban slums (JJ colony) of Delhi. The participants were enrolled in two cohorts - the medicine cohort (MC) and the control cohort (CC). Participants in MC were given weekly one dose of EP 30C for 10 weeks along with Information, Education and Communication (IEC) material regarding dengue. Participants in the CC were provided with the IEC material only. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of dengue fever as per case definitions notified in the national guidelines for clinical management of dengue fever by the Government of India during the 10 weeks follow-up period. The secondary outcome measures were the incidence of AFI and the hospitalization of confirmed dengue cases. RESULTS: The analysis included 40,769 participants residing in 06 slum clusters of Delhi out of which 28,321 participants were in MC and 12,448 participants were in CC. The incidence of laboratory-confirmed dengue in the MC was 2.57 per 10,000 person-weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02-3.22) in comparison with 7.55 per 10,000 person-weeks (95% CI, 6.12-9.21) in the CC. The incidence of AFI in the MC was 19.66 per 10,000 person-weeks (95% CI, 18.07-21.36) in comparison with 40.96 per 10,000 person-weeks (95% CI, 37.48-44.67) in the CC. The overall protective effect of EP against laboratory-confirmed dengue was 65.77% (95% CI, 53.37-74.87; p = 0.0001) and against AFI was 52.58% (95% CI, 46.37-58.07; p = 0.0001). Hospitalization reported in the MC was nil as against 4.35% in the CC. No dengue-related case fatalities were reported from either cohort. None of the participants from the MC reported any adverse events owing to the prophylactic intervention. CONCLUSION: The study concludes that EP 30C was able to prevent dengue significantly. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm or refute our findings.ZielDas Ziel dieser Studie war die Beurteilung der Wirksamkeit von Eupatorium perfoliatum (EP) 30C auf die Inzidenz von Dengue-Fieber und akuter fiebriger Erkrankung (AFE) während des Dengue-Ausbruchs 2017.MethodenWir führten eine prospektive, unverblindete, Bevölkerungs-Parallelgruppen-Kohortenstudie mit augenscheinlich gesunden Bewohnern von 6 städtischen Slums (JJ-Kolonie) in Delhi durch. Die Teilnehmer wurden in 2 Kohorten aufgenommen, einer Medizinkohorte (MK) und einer Kontrollkohorte (KK). Die Teilnehmer in der MK erhielten 10 Wochen lang wöchentlich eine Dosis EP 30C und dazu Aufklärungsmaterialien über Dengue. Die Teilnehmer in der KK erhielten nur die Aufklärungsmaterialien. Die primäre Zielgröße war die Dengue-Fieber-Inzidenz laut der in den nationalen Leitlinien für das klinische Management des Dengue-Fiebers von der indischen Regierung bekannt gegebenen Falldefinition in dem zehnwöchigen Beobachtungszeitraum. Die sekundären Zielgrößen waren die Inzidenz von AFE und die Anzahl hospitalisierter bestätigter Dengue-Fälle.ErgebnisseIn die Analyse wurden 40,769 Bewohner von 6 Slum-Clustern in Delhi einbezogen, davon wurden 28,321 Teilnehmer in die MK aufgenommen und 12,448 Teilnehmer in die KK. Die Inzidenz von im Labor bestätigter Dengue betrug in der MK 2,57 pro 10,000 Personen/Woche (95%-Konfidenzintervall [KI]: 2,02­3,22), verglichen mit 7,55 pro 10,000 Personen/Woche (95%-KI: 6,12­9,21) in der KK. Die Inzidenz von AFI betrug in der MK 19,66 pro 10,000 Personen/Woche (95%-Konfidenzintervall [KI]: 18,07­21,36), verglichen mit 40,96 pro 10,000 Personen/Woche (95%-KI: 37,48­44,67) in der KK. Der Schutzeffekt (SE) von EP betrug gegen im Labor bestätigte Dengue 65,77% (95%-KI: 53,37­74,87; p = 0,0001) und gegen AFI 52,58% (95%-KI: 46,37­58,07; p = 0,0001). Die Hospitalisierungsrate war in der MK gleich Null versus 4,35% in der KK. In keiner Kohorte waren Dengue-bedingte Todesfälle zu verzeichnen. Bei keinem der Teilnehmer in der MK traten jegliche unerwünschten Ereignisse infolge der prophylaktischen Maßnahme auf.SchlussfolgerungDie Studie gelangt zu dem Schluss, dass Eupatorium perfoliatum 30C in signifikantem Maße Dengue vorbeugen konnte. Randomisierte kontrollierte Studien sind erforderlich, um unsere Ergebnisse zu bestätigen bzw. zu widerlegen.


Assuntos
Dengue , Eupatorium , Humanos , Áreas de Pobreza , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Surtos de Doenças , Dengue/epidemiologia , Dengue/prevenção & controle
18.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(10): e2336854, 2023 10 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37792377

RESUMO

Importance: Protein recombinant vaccine NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax) against COVID-19 was authorized for its use in adults in late 2021, but evidence on its estimated effectiveness in a general population is lacking. Objective: To estimate vaccine effectiveness of a primary cycle with NVX-CoV2373 against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study linking data from the national vaccination registry and the COVID-19 surveillance system in Italy during a period of Omicron predominance. All adults starting a primary vaccination with NVX-CoV2373 between February 28 and September 4, 2022, were included, with follow-up ending on September 25, 2022. Data were analyzed in February 2023. Exposures: Partial (1 dose only) vaccination and full vaccination (2 doses) with NVX-CoV-2373. Main Outcomes and Measures: Notified SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19. Poisson regression models were used to estimate effectiveness against both outcomes. Adjusted estimated vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1 - incidence rate ratio) × 100. Results: The study included 20 903 individuals who started the primary cycle during the study period. Median (IQR) age of participants was 52 (39-61) years, 10 794 (51.6%) were female, and 20 592 participants (98.5%) had no factors associated with risk for severe COVID-19. Adjusted estimated vaccine effectiveness against notified SARS-CoV-2 infection in those partially vaccinated with NVX-CoV2373 was 23% (95% CI, 13%-33%) and was 31% (95% CI, 22%-39%) in those fully vaccinated. Estimated vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 was 31% (95% CI, 16%-44%) in those partially vaccinated and 50% (95% CI, 40%-58%) in those fully vaccinated. Estimated effectiveness during the first 4 months after completion of the primary cycle decreased against SARS-CoV-2 infection but remained stable against symptomatic COVID-19. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that, in an Omicron-dominant period, protein recombinant vaccine NVX-CoV2373 was associated with protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19. The use of this vaccine could remain an important element in reducing the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas
19.
Lancet Microbe ; 4(9): e722-e731, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37659420

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Assessment of viral kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 can inform on host immune responses to the virus and on the viral transmission potential. We aimed to characterise viral shedding kinetics by age, virus type, and clinical outcome, and to examine the potential effect of vaccination on viral shedding. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we analysed longitudinal data on cycle threshold (Ct) values of reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assays of upper respiratory tract samples from symptomatic patients with COVID-19. Patients who were confirmed with COVID-19 with at least one Ct value of the RT-qPCR test available within 28 days after symptom onset, and discharged or died at the time of the analysis, were included in the study. Patients were isolated in hospitals in Hong Kong during three major epidemic waves dominated by the ancestral strain or omicron BA.2. We modelled the temporal trajectories of viral burden in these patients. Electronic medical records of the patients with COVID-19 were retrieved and linked to the patients' epidemiological information obtained from contact tracing. Patients who were infected outside Hong Kong, infected with variants other than the ancestral strain or omicron BA.2, not reporting any COVID-19 related symptoms, still hospitalised at the time of analysis, missing information on age, time of symptom onset, infection severity, vaccination or clinical outcome, infected more than once, or treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir or molnupiravir were excluded from analysis. The main outcome of this study is the temporal change of SARS-CoV-2 viral burden measured by Ct values of RT-qPCR tests in symptomatic patients with COVID-19. FINDINGS: Among 22 461 symptomatic patients with COVID-19 confirmed from July 1, 2020, to May 22, 2022, the estimated viral burden from a random-effects model indicated a longer duration of viral shedding in patients with more severe outcomes of infection (mean difference 13·1 days, 95% CI 12·9-13·3, for fatal vs mild-to-moderate) and in older patients (5·2, 5·0-5·5, for age ≥80 years vs 0-18 years). Vaccinated individuals with a breakthrough infection with the omicron BA.2 variant had a generally lower viral burden and shorter durations of viral shedding (mean difference of 2-4 days) over 4 weeks after onset than unvaccinated individuals infected with omicron BA.2, particularly in patients whose last dose of COVID-19 vaccine was received ≤90 days before symptom onset. Marginal differences in viral burden following symptom onset and the duration of viral shedding were observed between unvaccinated individuals infected with the ancestral strain and omicron BA.2. INTERPRETATION: The viral kinetics since symptom onset characterised for symptomatic patients with COVID-19 in our study show that previously vaccinated or younger individuals, or those with a milder infection, shed fewer viruses in a shorter period, implying possible transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 and protective mechanisms of vaccination against infection and severe outcomes. FUNDING: Hong Kong Health and Medical Research Fund and Hong Kong Collaborative Research Fund.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Cinética
20.
BMC Nephrol ; 24(1): 245, 2023 08 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37608357

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: On December 29, 2021, during the delta wave of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the stock of premanufactured solutions used for continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) at the University of New Mexico Hospital (UNMH) was nearly exhausted with no resupply anticipated due to supply chain disruptions. Within hours, a backup plan, devised and tested 18 months prior, to locally produce CKRT dialysate was implemented. This report describes the emergency implementation and outcomes of this on-site CKRT dialysate production system. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective case series and narrative report describing and reporting the outcomes of the implementation of an on-site CKRT dialysate production system. All adults treated with locally produced CKRT dialysate in December 2021 and January 2022 at UNMH were included. CKRT dialysate was produced locally using intermittent hemodialysis machines, hemodialysis concentrate, sterile parenteral nutrition bags, and connectors made of 3-D printed biocompatible rigid material. Outcomes analyzed included dialysate testing for composition and microbiologic contamination, CKRT prescription components, patient mortality, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, and catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). RESULTS: Over 13 days, 22 patients were treated with 3,645 L of locally produced dialysate with a mean dose of 20.0 mL/kg/h. Fluid sample testing at 48 h revealed appropriate electrolyte composition and endotoxin levels and bacterial colony counts at or below the lower limit of detection. No CLABSIs occurred within 7 days of exposure to locally produced dialysate. In-hospital mortality was 81.8% and 28-day mortality was 68.2%, though illness severity was high, with a mean SOFA score of 14.5. CONCLUSIONS: Though producing CKRT fluid with IHD machines is not novel, this report represents the first description of the rapid and successful implementation of a backup plan for local CKRT dialysate production at a large academic medical center in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic. Though conclusions are limited by the retrospective design and limited sample size of our analysis, our experience could serve as a guide for other centers navigating similar severe supply constraints in the future.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Terapia de Substituição Renal Contínua , Adulto , Humanos , Soluções para Diálise , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA