Cardiovascular evaluation and endothelial dysfunction in Cushing syndrome following remission: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Cushing syndrome (CS) is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular morbidities. We aimed to evaluate endothelial and cardiovascular functions, endothelial mediators and pro-inflammatory cytokines in patients with CS before and after remission. METHODS: Adult patients with newly diagnosed endogenous CS were included. Metabolic [body mass index (BMI), glucose, and lipid values] and cardiovascular evaluation studies [24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and echocardiography] were performed, and endothelial mediators [asymmetric dimethyl arginine (ADMA) and endothelin-1 (ET-1)] and pro-inflammatory cytokines [interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)] were measured. Control group was matched in terms of age, gender, and BMIs. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients, mean age 40.60 ± 14.04 years, completed the study. Compared to controls (n = 20) mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CIMT were higher (p < 0.005 and p = 0.012, respectively), and FMD (p < 0.001) and mitral E/A ratio (p = 0.007) lower in the patients during active disease. Baseline serum ADMA, ET-1, and IL-1ß were similar between the groups, while TNF-α was lower in the patients (p = 0.030). All patients were in complete remission 1 year following surgery. BMI, LDL cholesterol, serum total cholesterol, fasting plasma glucose, MAPs, and CIMT significantly decreased (p < 0.005), while there was no improvement in FMD (p = 0.11) following remission. There was no significant change in ADMA, IL-1ß, and TNF-α levels, but ET-1 increased (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Remission in CS improves some cardiovascular parameters. ADMA and ET-1 are not reliable markers for endothelial dysfunction in CS. Metabolic improvements may not directly reflect on serum concentrations of TNF-α and IL-1ß following remission of CS.

LONGER CECUM INSERTION TIME AND MORE INADEQUATE COLONIC PREPARATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACROMEGALY: IS A DIFFERENT COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION NEEDED?

PURPOSE: To investigate whether there is a difference between acromegalic and non-acromegalic cases in terms of bowel preparation and colonoscopic intervention. METHODS: Patients with controlled and uncontrolled acromegaly and as a control group (CG) patients without acromegaly between January 2010 and March 2014 were included. Groups were compared regarding adequacy of bowel preparation, cecal insertion time (CIT) and colonoscopy results. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients with acromegaly (controlled n=30, uncontrolled n=29) and 73 age and gender matched volunteers without acromegaly were evaluated. CIT in cases with controlled, uncontrolled acromegaly cases and in CG was 5.33 [4.00-6.00], 7.00 [4.91-11.31], and 3.10 [2.35-4.65] minutes, respectively (p<0.001). Cases in CG had shorter CIT compared to controlled and uncontrolled acromegaly cases ( p=0.014 and p<0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference regarding CIT between controlled and uncontrolled acromegaly cases (p=0.247). Six (20%) of controlled acromegaly patients, 10 (35%) of uncontrolled acromegaly patients and three (4%) of CG had inadequate bowel cleansing (p<0.001). Although statistically insignificant, cases with inadequate bowel cleansing had tendency towards having prolonged CIT in comparison to cases with adequate bowel cleansing (6.00 [3.87-9.00] and 4.16 [2.95-5.70] minutes, respectively, p=0.07). CONCLUSION: Inadequate bowel cleansing is one of the main problems encountered during colonoscopic investigation/surveillance in acromegalic patients. Therefore, a different protocol for colonoscopy preparation may be needed for these cases.