RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients with prosthetic valves who developed infective endocarditis by comparing treatment outcomes in both early- and late-onset IE episodes following prosthetic valve replacement surgery. This study sought to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the efficacy of these methodologies. The insights derived from this assessment can be utilized to enhance the quality of care for individuals with infective endocarditis who have undergone prosthetic valve replacement surgery. RESULTS: During the period of investigation (January 2017-December 2022), 78 patients diagnosed with infective endocarditis (IE) on a prosthetic valve were admitted to the Infectious Diseases Department of the "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Emergency University Hospital in Bucharest. In 28 patients (35.8%), the onset of PVE occurred within 12 months of surgery (early onset), whereas in 50 patients (64.2%), the onset occurred more than 12 months after surgery (late onset). The mortality rate was 35.9% (53.6% among the early onset patients and 26% among the late-onset patients). Among patients who received surgical and medical therapy, the mortality rate was 29.6%, whereas among those who received only medical therapy, a 39.2% mortality rate was reported. According to the extracted data, antibiotic therapy was successful in 72.6% of the patients. In contrast, a combination of surgical and drug-based approaches resulted in a cure in 76.1% of patients. The most common etiological agent was Staphylococcus aureus (38.5%), followed by Enterococcus faecalis (26.9%) and Streptococcus mitis (10.3%). The mortality rate of patients infected with S. aureus was 29.2%, indicating the severity of this infectious agent. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is a serious condition associated with a high mortality rate both in the short and long term. Regardless of the therapy used, the risk of death remains high.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a pathological condition caused by various microbial agents that can lead to severe complications affecting the heart. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for the effective management of patients with IE. Blood culture is the gold standard for identifying the primary infectious agents, which is a key factor in diagnosing IE using the modified Duke criteria. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of the etiological agents of IE and the most common secondary diagnoses associated with it. METHOD: A total of 152 patients aged 23-95 years with a diagnosis of IE and proven etiology (through blood cultures or serological tests) were included in this study. RESULTS: The most common etiological agent identified through blood tests was Enterococcus faecalis, which was detected in 39 patients (23.5%). Staphylococcus aureus was the second most common agent and was identified in 33 patients (19.9%), followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis, which was identified in 12 patients (13.1%). Nine patients (5.8%) had high levels of anti-Coxiella burnetti IgG phase I and II antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: IE is a leading cause of death in the Department of Infectious Diseases. Early and accurate diagnosis, along with interdisciplinary treatment, can significantly increase the chances of patient survival. Currently, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus are the dominant etiological agents of IE, highlighting the need to revise protocols for prophylaxis, diagnosis, and initial treatment of this condition.