Seroprevalence of Infection by Borrelia Species Responsible for Lyme Disease in the French Alps: Analysis of 27,360 Serology Tests, 2015-2020.

Objectives: Lyme borreliosis incidence is increasing in several areas; moreover, it has recently gained the public's attention. Apart from erythema migrans, Lyme disease diagnosis relies (among others) on serology test; however, the prevalence of positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and western blot (WB) assay has been poorly studied in the general population. We aimed to approach the seroprevalence of infection by Borrelia species responsible for Lyme disease in the French Isere department using city laboratories data. Patients and Methods: We retrieved all serological tests for Borrelia species responsible for Lyme disease performed in the two main networks of city laboratories between 2015 and 2020. All patients with both ELISA and WB IgG were considered seropositive. Results: We analyzed 27,360 tests (ELISA/ELISA+WB). Mean age was 50.9 ± 20.3 years (ranges: 0-101), with 57.1% females. Overall, 11.7% had IgG detected by ELISA, and 4.7% had IgG detected by both ELISA and WB assay. Seropositive status was more frequent in males (7.0% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001). Seropositivity rate increased with age after a first peak in childhood; men aged 61-70 years had the highest seropositivity rate (10.3%). In addition, seropositivity rate was higher in persons from a rural area. In multivariate analysis, older age, male gender and living in a rural area were independently associated with seropositivity. Seropositivity rate was stable on the 2017-2020 period. Conclusion: The seroprevalence of infection by Borrelia species responsible for Lyme disease is high in Isere; this probably reduces the predictive positive value for Lyme disease of ELISA and WB IgG, suggesting that this serological test should not be performed for nonspecific symptoms.

Encephalitis in HIV-negative immunodeficient patients: a prospective multicentre study, France, 2016 to 2019.

BackgroundData on infectious encephalitis in immunodeficient (ID) individuals are scarce. This population may present with atypical clinical symptoms, be infected by uncommon pathogens and develop poor outcomes.AimWe aimed to describe the epidemiology of infectious encephalitis among HIV-negative ID patients.MethodsPatients from the ENCEIF (Etude Nationale de Cohorte des Encéphalites Infectieuses en France) prospective cohort meeting criteria for infectious encephalitis between January 2016 and December 2019 were included. We compared clinical presentation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results, biological results, infection causes and outcome of ID patients with immunocompetent (IC) patients using Pearson's chi-squared test and Student's t-test. We carried out logistic regression to assess the role of immunodeficiency as risk factor for poor outcome.ResultsID patients (n = 58) were older (mean 72 vs 59 years), had higher prevalence of diabetes (26% vs 12%), pre-existing neurological disorders (12% vs 5%) and higher case-fatality rate (23.6% vs 5.6%) compared to IC patients (n = 436). Varicella zoster virus was the primary cause of encephalitis in ID patients (this aetiology was more frequent in ID (25.9%) than in IC patients (11.5%)), with herpes simplex virus second (22.4% in ID patients vs 27.3% in IC patients). Immunodeficiency was an independent risk factor for death or major sequelae (odds ratio: 3.41, 95%CI: 1.70-6.85).ConclusionsVaricella zoster virus is the most frequent cause of infectious encephalitis in ID patients. Immunodeficiency is a major risk factor for poor outcome. ID encephalitis patients should benefit from stringent investigation of cause and early empiric treatment.

Cytomegalovirus detection is associated with ICU admission in non-AIDS and AIDS patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is frequently detected in lung and/or blood samples of patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), although this co-detection is not precisely understood. We aimed to determine whether PJP was more severe in case of CMV detection. METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients with a diagnosis of PJP between 2009 and 2020 in our centre and with a measure of CMV viral load in blood and/or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). PJP severity was assessed by the requirement for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: The median age of the 249 patients was 63 [IQR: 53-73] years. The main conditions were haematological malignancies (44.2%), solid organ transplantations (16.5%), and solid organ cancers (8.8%). Overall, 36.5% patients were admitted to ICU. CMV was detected in BAL in 57/227 patients; the 37 patients with viral load ≥3 log copies/mL were more frequently admitted to ICU (78.4% vs 28.4%, p<0.001). CMV was also detected in blood in 57/194 patients; the 48 patients with viral load ≥3 log copies/mL were more frequently admitted to ICU (68.7% vs 29.4%, p<0.001). ICU admission rate was found to increase with each log of BAL CMV viral load and each log of blood CMV viral load. CONCLUSIONS: PJP is more severe in the case of concomitant CMV detection. This may reflect either the deleterious role of CMV itself, which may require antiviral therapy, or the fact that patients with CMV reactivation are even more immunocompromised.

Mind the gap: Concordance between perceptions regarding vaccination as declared by patients and their evaluation by their general practitioner.

BACKGROUND: The high level of vaccine hesitancy reported in the French population may lead general practitioners to anticipate difficult discussions on this topic. We aimed to assess the extent to which general practitioners' evaluation of their patients' vaccine hesitancy was correlated with the real vaccine hesitancy expressed by these patients. METHODS: The study was based on two brief paper questionnaires completed in private by the general practitioner and the patient at the beginning of a medical appointment: one for the physician to evaluate on three quantitative and non-graduated visual scales (then analysed as a 0-100 scale) their patients' perceptions regarding vaccine safety, vaccine efficacy and 'being in favour of vaccination'; and one for the patient to express their perceptions for the same three axes using the same scales. RESULTS: Overall, 31 physicians participated in the study, with 540 physician-patient pairs being included. The physicians' evaluation of patient perceptions was more positive when the physician was male (vs female), when the patient was male (vs female) and when both were males (vs both females). The median differences (in absolute values) between the physician evaluations and the patient perceptions were between 9 and 11 (on the 0-100 scale) for the three axes (vaccine safety, vaccine efficacy and 'being in favour'). A correlation was observed between the physicians' evaluation and the patients' declaration (Kendall test: vaccine efficacy: tau = 0.199, p < 0.001; vaccine safety: tau = 0.234, p < 0.001; being in favour of vaccination: tau = 0.365, p < 0.001). Physicians correctly classified 83.4 % of the patients with high perceptions of vaccine safety and efficacy (>75/100 for both scales) but only 54.5 % of those with low perceptions (<75/100 for both scales). CONCLUSION: Physicians tend to correctly identify patients with the most favourable perceptions about vaccination but not those with the least favourable perceptions.

Length of stay in at-risk areas and time to malaria attack on return.

BACKGROUND: Experimental infection with Plasmodium falciparum results in malaria attack within a few days of exposure. However, we have regularly observed malaria attack within a short time after return, regardless of the time spent in an endemic area. We therefore aimed to assess whether the time before return and malaria attack varies according to length of stay. METHODS: We used anonymized data from the French National Reference Centre for Malaria between 2006 and 2016. We analyzed 11,823 cases aged at least 1 year and diagnosed with P. falciparum malaria 1 day to 1 year after returning to France, after a stay of 1 day to 1 year in an at-risk area. RESULTS: Trips had a median duration of 31 days [IQR: 19-56]. Median time between return from the endemic area and onset of malaria symptoms was 5 days [IQR: 0-10], and the median between return and malaria diagnosis was 9 days [IQR: 5-14]. Times to symptom onset or diagnosis were longer for stays of fewer than 15 days vs 15 days or more (for symptoms: 7 vs 4 days for longer stays, for diagnosis: 11 vs 9 days). For stays longer than 15 days, no variation was observed according to length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Aside from at-risk stays of fewer than 15 days, the time between return and malaria attack is constant and rather short, even after long stays. The 2 weeks following return should be considered as a risk period whatever the length of stay in an at-risk area.

Early picc-line infections in non-neutropenic patients are mainly due to E. coli suggesting that third-generation cephalosporin may be used as a first-line antibiotic therapy.

PURPOSE: To describe the rate of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) -associated bloodstream infections, and the pathogens involved. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed data collected from all adult patients with a PICC insertion in a hematology unit in a tertiary care center between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 370 PICCs were inserted in 275 patients with hematological malignancies: 54 (15 %) confirmed cases of central-line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) were identified. Enterobacteria were the most frequent bacteria identified, involved in 35 % of CLABSIs. Group 1 enterobacteria bacteremia occurred a much shorter time after insertion (median time to CLABSI 16 days) than group 2 or group 3 enterobacteria (median time to CLABSI 64 days, p-value = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Among Gram-negative bacilli CLABSI among non-neutropenic patients, E. coli identification was the most frequent and occurred earlier after insertion, suggesting that third-generation cephalosporin may be used as a first-line antibiotic therapy for enterobacteria bacteremia among non-neutropenic patients.

Alveolar echinococcosis in solid organ transplant recipients: a case series from two national cohorts.

Alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is a severe parasitic infection caused by the ingestion of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs. While higher incidence and faster evolution have been reported in immunosuppressed patients, no studies have been performed specifically on AE in transplant patients. We searched for all de novo AE cases diagnosed between January 2008 and August 2018 in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients included in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study and the FrancEchino Registry. Eight cases were identified (kidney = 5, lung = 2, heart = 1, liver = 0), half of which were asymptomatic at diagnosis. AE diagnosis was difficult due to the low sensitivity (60%) of the standard screening serology (Em2+) and the frequently atypical radiological presentations. Conversely, Echinococcus Western blot retained good diagnostic performances and was positive in all eight cases. Five patients underwent surgery, but complete resection could only be achieved in one case. Moreover, two patients died of peri-operative complications. Albendazole was initiated in seven patients and was well tolerated. Overall, AE regressed in one, stabilized in three, and progressed in one case, and had an overall mortality of 37.5% (3/8 patients). Our data suggest that AE has a higher mortality and a faster clinical course in SOT recipients; they also suggest that the parasitic disease might be due to the reactivation of latent microscopic liver lesions through immune suppression. Western blot serology should be preferred in this population. Finally, surgery should be considered with caution, because of its low success rate and high mortality, and conservative treatment with albendazole is well tolerated.

Title: Échinococcose alvéolaire chez les receveurs d'une greffe d'organe solide : une série de cas de deux cohortes nationales. Abstract: L'échinococcose alvéolaire (EA) est une maladie parasitaire grave causée par l'ingestion d'œufs d'Echinococcus multilocularis. Bien qu'une plus haute incidence et une évolution plus rapide aient été rapportées chez les patients immunodéprimés, aucune étude n'a été conduite spécifiquement sur cette maladie chez les patients transplantés. Nous avons donc listé tous les cas d'échinococcose alvéolaire apparus de novo entre janvier 2008 et août 2018 chez les patients transplantés d'organe solide inclus dans la cohorte Swiss Transplant Cohort Study et le registre FrancEchino. Huit patients ont été identifiés (rein = 5, poumon = 2, cœur = 1, foie = 0), dont la moitié était asymptomatique au moment du diagnostic. Le diagnostic était compliqué par la basse sensibilité (60 %) de la sérologie standard de dépistage (Em2+) et par les présentations radiologiques atypiques des lésions. Les performances diagnostiques du Western Blot n'étaient toutefois pas affectées et ce test était positif chez tous les patients. Sur les cinq patients opérés, une résection complète n'a été possible que dans un cas, tandis que deux patients sont décédés dans les suites de l'opération. L'albendazole a été introduit chez 7 patients et a été bien toléré. Dans l'ensemble, l'EA s'est stabilisée dans 3 cas, a régressé dans un cas et a progressé dans un autre cas, avec une mortalité de 37,5 % (3/8 patients). Nos résultats suggèrent une mortalité plus élevée et une évolution plus rapide de l'EA chez les patients transplantés. Ils suggèrent aussi que la maladie parasitaire pourrait être due à la réactivation de lésions hépatiques microscopiques latentes à la faveur de l'immunosuppression. Le Western Blot devrait être préféré dans cette population. Finalement, la chirurgie devrait être envisagée avec prudence, étant donnés son faible taux de réussite, le nombre élevé de décès peri-opératoires et la bonne tolérance au traitement conservateur par albendazole.

Exclusion of older adults and immunocompromised individuals in influenza, pneumococcal and COVID-19 vaccine trials before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Older adults and immunocompromised individulas are often excluded from vaccine trials. AIM: We hypothesised that during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the proportion of trials excluding these patients decreased. METHODS: Using the US Food and Drug Administration and and European Medicines Agency search engines, we identified all vaccines approved against pneumococcal disease, influenza (quadrivalent vaccines), and COVID-19 from 2011 to 2021. Study protocols were screened for direct and indirect age exclusion criteria and exclusion of immunocompromised individuals. In addition, we reviewed the studies with no explicit exclusion criteria and investigated the actual inclusion of those individuals. RESULTS: We identified 2024 trial records; 1702 were excluded (e.g., use of other vaccine or risk group); and 322 studies were eligible for our review. Among the pneumococcal and influenza vaccine trials (n = 193), 81 (42%) had an explicit direct age exclusion, and 150 (78%) had an indirect age-related exclusion. In total, 163 trials (84%) trials were likely to exclude older adults. Among the COVID-19 vaccine trials (n = 129), 33 (26%) had direct age exclusion and 82 (64%) had indirect age exclusion; in total, 85 (66%) trials were likely to exclude older adults. Therefore was a 18% decrease in the proportion of trials with age-related exclusion between 2011 and 2021 (only influenza and pneumococcal vaccine trials) and 2020-2021 (only COVID-19 vaccine trials) (p = 0.014). In a sub-analysis assessing observational and randomised trials, the decrease was 25% and 9%, respectively. Immunocompromised individuals were included in 87 (45%) of the pneumococcal and influenza vaccine trials compared with 54 (42%) of the COVID-19 vaccine trials (p = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we found a decrease in the exclusion of older adults from vaccine trials but no significant change in the inclusion of immunocompromised individulas.

Fatal HSV-2 primary infection most likely acquired by kidney transplantation: A case report.

Herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) rarely causes severe disease, even in solid organ transplant recipients. This paper describes a fatal case of HSV-2 infection, probably transmitted from a donor to a kidney transplant recipient. The donor was seropositive for HSV-2 but not for HSV-1, whereas the recipient was seronegative for both viruses before transplantation, suggesting that the graft was the source of infection. The recipient received valganciclovir prophylaxis due to cytomegalovirus seropositivity. Three months after transplantation, the recipient presented with rapidly disseminated cutaneous HSV-2 infection with meningoencephalitis. The HSV-2 strain was resistant to acyclovir, probably acquired under valganciclovir prophylaxis. Despite early initiation of acyclovir therapy, the patient died. This fatal case of HSV-2 infection, probably transmitted by the kidney graft with acyclovir-resistant HSV-2 from the onset, is uncommon.

Virological Markers in Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Diseases.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is an oncogenic virus infecting more than 95% of the world's population. After primary infection-responsible for infectious mononucleosis in young adults-the virus persists lifelong in the infected host, especially in memory B cells. Viral persistence is usually without clinical consequences, although it can lead to EBV-associated cancers such as lymphoma or carcinoma. Recent reports also suggest a link between EBV infection and multiple sclerosis. In the absence of vaccines, research efforts have focused on virological markers applicable in clinical practice for the management of patients with EBV-associated diseases. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is an EBV-associated malignancy for which serological and molecular markers are widely used in clinical practice. Measuring blood EBV DNA load is additionally, useful for preventing lymphoproliferative disorders in transplant patients, with this marker also being explored in various other EBV-associated lymphomas. New technologies based on next-generation sequencing offer the opportunity to explore other biomarkers such as the EBV DNA methylome, strain diversity, or viral miRNA. Here, we review the clinical utility of different virological markers in EBV-associated diseases. Indeed, evaluating existing or new markers in EBV-associated malignancies or immune-mediated inflammatory diseases triggered by EBV infection continues to be a challenge.

Impact of vaccination on the presence and severity of symptoms in hospitalized patients with an infection of the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of the SARS-CoV-2 (subvariant BA.1).

OBJECTIVES: The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants raised questions about the extent to which vaccines designed in 2020 have remained effective. We aimed to assess whether vaccine status was associated with the severity of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalized patients. METHODS: We conducted an international, multi-centric, retrospective study in 14 centres (Bulgaria, Croatia, France, and Turkey). We collected data on patients hospitalized for ≥24 hours between 1 December 2021 and 3 March 2022 with PCR-confirmed infection at a time of exclusive Omicron circulation and hospitalization related or not related to the infection. Patients who had received prophylaxis by monoclonal antibodies were excluded. Patients were considered fully vaccinated if they had received at least two injections of either mRNA and/or ChAdOx1-S or one injection of Ad26.CoV2-S vaccines. RESULTS: Among 1215 patients (median age, 73.0 years; interquartile range, 57.0-84.0; 51.3% men), 746 (61.4%) were fully vaccinated. In multivariate analysis, being vaccinated was associated with lower 28-day mortality (Odds Ratio [95% Confidence Interval] (OR [95CI]) = 0.50 [0.32-0.77]), intensive care unit admission (OR [95CI] = 0.40 [0.26-0.62]), and oxygen requirement (OR [95CI] = 0.34 [0.25-0.46]), independent of age and comorbidities. When co-analysing these patients with Omicron infection with 948 patients with Delta infection from a study we recently conducted, Omicron infection was associated with lower 28-day mortality (OR [95CI] = 0.53 [0.37-0.76]), intensive care unit admission (OR [95CI] = 0.19 [0.12-0.28]), and oxygen requirements (OR [95CI] = 0.50 [0.38-0.67]), independent of age, comorbidities, and vaccination status. DISCUSSION: Originally designed vaccines have remained effective on the severity of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection. Omicron is associated with a lower risk of severe forms, independent of vaccination and patient characteristics.

Comparison of Elecsys and Liaison immunoassays to determine Epstein-Barr virus serological status using further diagnostic approaches to clarify discrepant results.

Serological markers for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection are commonly used to diagnose infectious mononucleosis and establish a serological status in pretransplant patients. This study prospectively assessed 1043 serum specimens sent to the laboratory for physician-ordered EBV testing. The three markers-antiviral capsid antigen (VCA) immunoglobulin M (IgM), anti-VCA immunoglobulin G (IgG), and anti-Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA) antibodies-were tested using the Elecsys and the Liaison immunoassays. Specimens with discrepant results between the two assays were assessed using further EBV diagnostic approaches to conclude on the EBV serological status. In spite of substantial agreement between the two assays (88%) and with the presumed EBV status (>92%), the results showed differences in the performance of the assays. Liaison VCA IgM appeared to be the most sensitive test for the detection of the 38 sera classified as early primary infection in comparison with the Elecsys assay (91.4% vs. 68.6%, p = 0.008). Excluding the cases of early primary infection, the sensitivity values of the VCA IgM marker were comparable between the Liaison and Elecsys assays (95.2% and 92.9%, respectively, p = 1). Concerning the sera classified as past infection (n = 763), the Elecsys assay showed higher sensitivity values for the detection of the VCA and EBNA IgG markers in comparison with the Liaison assay (99.9% and 99.7% vs. 97.4% and 91.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). Overall, the Elecsys and Liaison assays showed similar performance. The interpretation of EBV serological profiles based on the clinical context may require serology follow up or further diagnostic approaches in challenging cases.

Letermovir use to treat complex cytomegalovirus reactivations in two heart transplant recipients.

Letermovir, an anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) drug, is recommended as a prophylactic agent in patients at risk of CMV infection/reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. We report the curative and pre-emptive use of letermovir in two heart transplant recipients. In one patient with ganciclovir-resistant CMV, letermovir was successfully used to treat CMV colitis. In the second patient, letermovir was used as pre-emptive therapy for CMV reactivation, but did not prevent CMV esophagitis. In both cases, letermovir was successful for secondary prophylaxis. Curative use of letermovir may be considered if resistance or major adverse effect of other antivirals therapy is suspected.

SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibodies after a fourth dose of COVID-19 vaccine in adult solid-organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: A fourth dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is recommended in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients, but the immunogenicity is poorly known. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational, monocentric study between the 1st January 2021 and 31st March 2022 of the anti-Spike antibody titers after one to four doses of vaccine in SOT. RESULTS: 825 SOT were included. Median age at first vaccine injection was 61.2 (IQR 50.9-69.3) years; 66.7 % were male; 63.4 % had received four vaccine doses. The proportion of participants with a strong humoral response (>260 BAU/mL) increased with the number of vaccine doses: 10.6 % after the 1st dose (D1), 35.1 % after the 2nd (D2), 48.5 % after the 3rd (D3), and 65.1 % after the 4th (D4) (p < 0.001). Among the tested patients, the proportion with a detectable humoral response was significantly higher after D4 than after D3 (47 % vs 22 %, p = 0.01). Liver transplant recipients had more frequently a strong humoral response after D2, D3 and D4 (OR = 5.3, 3.7 and 6.6 respectively when compared with other organ transplant recipients, p < 0.001). In kidney transplant recipients, belatacept-containing regimen was associated with a lower rate of detectable humoral (9 % vs 40 %, p = 0.025) after D3, but there was no statistical difference after D4. CONCLUSION: A fourth dose should be proposed to SOT recipients who did not developed an immune response after 3 doses. Kidney transplant recipients receiving belatacept have a poorer, although frequently detectable response.

Fine Analysis of Lymphocyte Subpopulations in SARS-CoV-2 Infected Patients: Differential Profiling of Patients With Severe Outcome.

COVID-19 is caused by the human pathogen severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has resulted in widespread morbidity and mortality. CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and neutralizing antibodies all contribute to control SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, heterogeneity is a major factor in disease severity and in immune innate and adaptive responses to SARS-CoV-2. We performed a deep analysis by flow cytometry of lymphocyte populations of 125 hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 infected patients on the day of hospital admission. Five clusters of patients were identified using hierarchical classification on the basis of their immunophenotypic profile, with different mortality outcomes. Some characteristics were observed in all the clusters of patients, such as lymphopenia and an elevated level of effector CD8+CCR7- T cells. However, low levels of T cell activation are associated to a better disease outcome; on the other hand, profound CD8+ T-cell lymphopenia, a high level of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell activation and a high level of CD8+ T-cell senescence are associated with a higher mortality outcome. Furthermore, a cluster of patient was characterized by high B-cell responses with an extremely high level of plasmablasts. Our study points out the prognostic value of lymphocyte parameters such as T-cell activation and senescence and strengthen the interest in treating the patients early in course of the disease with targeted immunomodulatory therapies based on the type of adaptive response of each patient.

Impact of vaccination on the symptoms of hospitalised patients with SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant (B.1.617.1) infection.

OBJECTIVES: The diffusion of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta (B.1.617.2) variant and the waning of immune response after primary Covid-19 vaccination favoured the breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in vaccinated subjects. To assess the impact of vaccination, we determined the severity of infection in hospitalised patients according to vaccine status. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study on patients hospitalised in 10 centres with a SARS-CoV-2 infection (Delta variant) from July to November 2021 by including all patients who had completed their primary vaccination at least 14 days before hospital admission and the same number of completely unvaccinated patients. We assessed the impact of vaccination and other risk factors through logistic regression. RESULTS: We included 955 patients (474 vaccinated and 481 unvaccinated). Vaccinated patients were significantly older (75.0 [63.25-84.0] vs. 55.0 [38.0-73.0]; p < 0.001), more frequently males (55.1% (261/474) vs. 46.4% (223/481); p = 0.009), and had more comorbidities (2.0 [1.0-3.0] vs. 1.0 [0.0-2.0]; p < 0.001). Vaccinated patients were less often admitted for Covid-19 (59.3% (281/474) vs. 75.1% (361/481); p < 0.001), had less extended lung lesions (≤25%: 64.3% (117/182) vs. 38.4% (88/229); p < 0.001), required oxygen less frequently (57.5% (229/398) vs. 73.0% (270/370); p < 0.001), at a lower flow (3.0 [0.0-8.7] vs. 6.0 [2.0-50.0] L/min, p < 0.001), and for a shorter duration (3 [0.0-8.0] vs. 6 [2.0-12.0] days, p < 0.001)., and required less frequently intensive care unit admission (16.2% (60/370) vs. 36.0% (133/369); p < 0.001) but had comparable mortality in bivariate analysis (16.7% (74/443) vs. 12.2% (53/433); p = 0.075). Multivariate logistic regression showed that vaccination significantly decreased the risk of death (0.38 [0.20-0.70](p = 0.002), ICU admission (0.31 [0.21-0.47](p < 0.001) and oxygen requirement (0.16 [0.10-0.26](p < 0.001), even among older patients or with comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalised with a delta variant SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination was associated with less severe forms, even in the presence of comorbidities.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of heterologous and homologous mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccination: A multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial.

Background: Although effective mRNA vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 infection have been deployed worldwide, their interchangeability could facilitate the scale-up of vaccination programs. The objective of the trial was to assess whether the immune response induced by a heterologous SARS-CoV-2 mRNA primo vaccination is non-inferior to that of a homologous mRNA vaccination. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial in adults 18 years of age and older who received a first dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a second dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, 28 to 49 days after the first dose. Randomization was stratified on the vaccine received at the first vaccination. The primary endpoint was the anti-spike IgG antibodies titer measured 28 days after the second vaccine dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Trial, NCT04900467. Findings: Of the 414 randomized participants recruited from May 28 to July 2, 2021, 390 were included in the per protocol analysis: 94 participants in group 1 (BNT162b2/BNT162b2), 96 in group 2 (BNT162b2/mRNA-1273), 97 in group 3 (mRNA-1273/mRNA-1273), and 103 in group 4 (mRNA-1273/BNT162b2). The geometric mean titers ratios of anti-spike IgG antibodies for each heterologous regimen relative to the corresponding homologous regimen were 1·37 (two-sided 95% CI, 1·10 to 1·72) in the groups 1 and 2 and 0·67 (two-sided 95% CI, 0·55 to 0·82) in the groups 3 and 4. Levels of neutralizing antibodies to the main circulating SARS-Cov-2 viral strains were higher with the vaccine regimen containing mRNA-1273. Participants who received mRNA-1273 as a second dose experienced a higher rate of local adverse reactions and general symptoms than those who received BNT162b2 (p < 0·0001). Interpretation: The two SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines could be used with flexibility for the second dose of COVID-19 primo vaccination. Tolerance remains good regardless of vaccine sequence although mRNA-1273 was more reactogenic. Funding: French Ministries of Solidarity and Health and Research. BNT162b2 was provided by Pfizer/BioNTech. mRNA-1273 was provided by Moderna.

Epidemiology and outcome of occult bacteremia in patients discharged from emergency departments or ambulatory units: one-year study.

Microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) is made several hours after blood culture sampling. This delay could be critical in ambulatory clinics, emergency departments, and hospital day care units, as the patient may be discharged prior to blood culture positivity. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical outcome (including the number of readmissions) of patients diagnosed with BSI after discharge. We prospectively included all adult patients with positive blood culture for BSI that was confirmed after discharge from our center (Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital) in 2016. Patients were contacted about their blood culture results, and their clinical status was controlled via an external consultation or their family physician, with hospital readmission if necessary. Clinical outcome, accuracy of initial diagnosis, microbiological epidemiology, and antibiotic prescription were assessed. In 2016, 1433 episodes of positive blood culture were detected in our hospital, with 50 (3.5%) occurring after patient discharge. Clinically relevant bacteria were determined in 32/50 cases (64%), while other positive blood culture results were considered to be contaminants. Clinical reevaluation was performed in 45 patients (90%). The diagnosis was changed during the clinical reassessment of 24/49 patients (49%). Antibiotics were prescribed prior to discharge for 24/50 patients (48%), modified during follow-up for 15/45 (33%), and initiated for 13/45 (29%) at the reevaluation. Overall, 24/45 (53%) patients were readmitted to hospital units after reevaluation. The clinical follow-up of patients with positive blood culture after discharge led to diagnostic changes and hospital readmission in around half of patients.