[Intussusception of appendix - a case report].

Intussusception of appendix is a rare condition and difficult to diagnose. We report a case of intussusception of appendix in a seven year old boy with history of abdominal pain.

Surgical repair of long-gap esophageal atresia: A retrospective study comparing the management of long-gap esophageal atresia in the Nordic countries.

BACKGROUND: Several surgical procedures have been described in the reconstruction of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). We reviewed the surgical methods used in children with LGEA in the Nordic countries over a 15-year period and the postoperative complications within the first postoperative year. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter medical record review of all children born with Gross type A or B esophageal atresia between 01/01/2000 and 12/31/2014 reconstructed within their first year of life. RESULTS: We included 71 children; 56 had Gross type A and 15 type B LGEA. Delayed primary anastomosis (DPA) was performed in 52.1% and an esophageal replacement procedure in 47.9%. Gastric pull-up (GPU) was the most frequent procedure (25.4%). The frequency of chromosomal abnormalities, congenital heart defects and other anomalies was significantly higher in patients who had a replacement procedure. The frequency of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) was significantly higher after DPA compared to esophageal replacement (p = 0.013). At 1-year follow-up the mean body weight was higher after DPA than after organ interposition (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: DPA and esophageal replacement procedures were equally applied. Postoperative complications and follow-up were similar except for the development of GER and the body weight at 1-year follow-up. Long-term results should be investigated. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: a population-based study from iceland, 1999-2010.

AIM: The aim of this study was to review the indications and the results of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) procedures in Icelandic children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all pediatric PEG procedures performed in Iceland in 1999-2010 was conducted. Diagnosis, demographics, complications, and body mass index were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-eight children (51 girls) were included. Median age was 2 years (range, 1 month-17 years). The most common diagnosis was neurological disease (56%). Median length of stay was 4 days (range, 1-189 days). Extended length of stay was not related to PEG. Before surgery, median body mass index (BMI) was 14.5 kg/m(2) (range, 9.8-20.8 kg/m(2)), and the median BMI-for-age z-score was -1.4 (range, -5.9 to 3.0). One year after surgery, median BMI was 15.3 kg/m(2) (range, 11.2-22.1 kg/m(2)), and median BMI-for-age z-score was -0.5 (range, -5.1 to 3.8). The median weight increased significantly in 1 year by 1.0 standard deviation (P<.0001; 95% confidence interval, -1.4820 to -0.7387). One hundred sixty-six complications were recorded in 65 children; 96% were minor, with the most common being granuloma formation (19%) and superficial skin infection (25%). The rate of infection was not statistically different between those who received preoperative antibiotics versus no antibiotics (P=.296). Major complications were peritonitis (n=3), esophageal tear (n=1), buried bumper (n=1), and malposition of the gastrostomy tube (n=1). Median follow-up was 47 months (range, 1-152 months). Fourteen children died (at 1 month to 3 years), but no deaths were related to PEG insertion. Twenty-seven children were without gastrostomy at follow-up. Twelve children (14%) underwent fundoplication later; 11 of them were neurologically impaired. CONCLUSIONS: PEG is a safe technique with a high complication rate, but the majority of complications are minor and easily treatable. Gastrostomy is sometimes temporary. Enteral feeding results in significant weight gain in 1 year.

[Appendicitis and appendectomy in children in Reykjavik Hospitals in 1996 and 2006]. / Botnlangabólga og botnlangataka hjá börnum á sjúkrahúsum í Reykjavík 1996 og 2006.

INTRODUCTION: Appendicitis is a common disease and can be life-threatening if not adequately treated. Studies have shown that if less than 20% of appendices removed are normal it indicates missing or delaying the diagnosis of appendicitis, resulting in an increased incidence of perforation. The purpose of this study was to analyze appendicitis in children during two separate time periods in the pediatric wards of the hospitals in Reykjavík and to increase our knowledge of appendicitis in children in the country. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients entering this study are two groups of 100 children (< or =16 years) consecutively undergoing appendectomy in the Reykjavik hospitals, one group in 1996 and the other in 2006. Data on sex, age, clinical symptoms and treatment was obtained from patients records. The impression of the surgeon at time of operation on the inflammation of the removed appendix was compared with results of histopathology analysis. All histopathology slides from appendices from 2006 were re-evaluated. The parameters in open appendectomies were compared to those in laparoscopic appendectomies. The two study periods were compared. RESULTS: The proportion of normal appendices was similar in both periods of the study, 18% in 2006 and 20% in 1996. The appendices were more often normal in female patients (p<0.05) and the large majority of those were removed by laparoscopic surgery. Perforation was present in 17% of inflamed appendices in both study groups. The time from patients arrival to hospital until surgery surpassed 10 hours in only one case in each study group. A discrepancy between the surgeon's assessment and the pathology result was noted only once in 2006 and in one additional case was the histopathological diagnosis altered following re-evaluation of the pathology slides. DISCUSSION: The proportion of non-inflamed appendices in appendectomies in children in Reykjavik is in accordance with that reported elsewhere and perforation is not common. There is a good concordance between surgical and pathological assessment with regard to inflammation of the appendices.