Investigating the Influential Factors of Mild Water-Filtered Infrared-A Whole-Body Hyperthermia for Pain Relief in Fibromyalgia: A Mixed-Methods Approach Focusing on Predictors and Patient Perspectives.

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic condition characterized by chronic widespread pain, persistent fatigue, and disrupted sleep, significantly impacting well-being. Mild water-filtered infrared-A (wIRA) whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) is emerging as a promising pain management approach to FMS. Within the present randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials ID: NCT05135936), FMS patients underwent six sessions of mild wIRA-WBH over 3 weeks. Their pain levels were assessed at baseline and at week 12, while body core temperature and plateau phase duration were monitored during WBH. Qualitative interviews were conducted at week 12. Results from this mixed-methods study revealed that baseline pain intensity and plateau phase duration significantly predicted pain intensity at week 12. Thematic analysis of the interviews revealed diverse patient experiences with the treatment, with all patients reporting improvements in perceived pain and overall well-being. The onset and duration of pain relief varied among individuals. Overall, the findings suggest that the duration of the plateau phase may serve as an indicator for long-term pain reduction, although individual factors may influence treatment outcomes. Despite varying experiences, a prevailing trend of positive patient evaluations emerged. This study sheds light on the potential of wIRA-WBH as a therapeutic option for alleviating pain for and enhancing the well-being of FMS patients.

Mild Water-Filtered Infrared-A Whole-Body Hyperthermia Reduces Pain in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome-A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial.

The challenging treatment situation of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) requires additional therapy options. The effects of water-filtered infrared-A whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) versus sham hyperthermia on pain intensity were investigated in an outpatient setting within a two-armed randomized sham-controlled trial. n = 41 participants aged between 18 and 70 years with a medically confirmed diagnosis of FMS were randomized to WBH (intervention; n = 21) or sham hyperthermia (control; n = 20). Six treatments with mild water-filtered infrared-A WBH over a period of three weeks with at least one day in between treatments were applied. On average, the maximum temperature was 38.7 °C for a duration of approximately 15 min. The control group received exactly the same treatment except that an insulating foil between the patient and the hyperthermia device blocked most of the radiation. Primary outcome was pain intensity measured by the Brief Pain Inventory at week 4. Secondary outcomes included blood cytokine levels and FMS-related core symptoms and quality of life. Pain intensity at week 4 was significantly different between the groups in favor of WBH (p = 0.015). A statistically significant pain reduction in favor of WBH was also found at week 30 (p = 0.002). Mild water-filtered infrared-A WBH effectively reduced pain intensity at the end of treatment and follow-up.

Mind-body-medicine and comprehensive lifestyle-modification in patients with Crohn's disease-Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial under pandemic circumstances.

Introduction: Mind-body medicine (MBM) focuses on stress reduction and lifestyle changes. The primary objective of this pilot trial was to test study feasibility of a complex integrative MBM program for patients with Crohn's disease (CD), especially in rural regions, and under pandemic conditions. Methods: Patients were stratified and randomized to the intervention group (IG) or the control group (CG). The intervention included a weekly 6-h session for 10 weeks. The CG (waiting list) received an initial 90-min workshop and started the intervention 9 months later. The primary outcome for study feasibility was recruitment and retention rates, as well as reasons for drop-out. The trial took place in Bamberg, Germany (September 2020 to December 2021). Results: Totally 700 members of the German Crohn's and Colitis Organization-DCCV-were contacted. A total of 15% (102/700; 95% CI 12-17%) expressed interest to participate. Following screening, 41% (95% CI 32-50) were randomized to IG (n = 22) and CG (n = 20). The patients were on average (±standard deviation) 48 ± 13 years old, 67% were female, and have been suffering from CD for 20 ± 12 years. Patients traveled 71.5 ± 48.7 km (range: 9-227 km) to the intervention with no differences between IG and CG. At the 6-month follow-up, 36/42 (86%, 95% CI 74-95%) participants completed final assessment and 19/22 (86%, 95% CI 70-100%) the intervention. The most important reasons for non-responding were work-related (12/60; 20%) and for or drop-out pandemic-related anxiety (3/6). No patient and staff member became infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the study. Conclusion: The feasibility of the MBM study was confirmed in terms of predefined recruitment and retention criteria, both despite difficult conditions (including the rural setting) and patients' fears associated with the pandemic. It was crucial to develop appropriate hygiene and safety concepts that enable chronically ill patients to participate in helpful group-based interventions even under pandemic conditions. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05182645.

Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): results from a German nationwide survey of 2019 compared to a previous survey of 2002.

INTRODUCTION: In 2002, 50% of patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) had used complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Germany. This survey aimed to examine changes from 2002 to 2019 and predictors of CAM use in 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2019, a questionnaire was sent randomly to 1000 members of the German Crohn's Colitis Association, the same sampling strategy was chosen 2002. Items assessed included, demographic characteristics, IBD diagnosis and disease history, medication use, patients' symptoms/quality of life, anxiety/depression and use of complementary therapies. RESULTS: The 2019 sample only differed slightly in case of gender (55% women) and disease (43% Ulcerative Colitis) from the 2002 sample. In 2019, 54% (227/417) reported having ever used CAM and 75% (396/417) planned to use CAM for their IBD in the future, whereby there was an evidence of a decrease in exclusive CAM use from 2002 (28%; 96/344) to 2019 (16%, 37/277; BF<.01). In logistic regression analyses, ulcerative colitis compared to Crohn's Disease (OR 0.59, p=.005), side effects of standard therapy (OR 1.94, p=.012), the use of corticosteroids (OR 0.54, p=.038) or biologics (OR 1.90, p = .020) and lower quality of life (OR 0.96, p=.002) were associated with CAM use in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Every other patient with IBD used CAM and has thus indicated a need for a safe and evidence-based combination of conventional and complementary approaches. This would further support the desired decrease in exclusive -alternative- CAM use.