Long-Term Survival of the Native Hip After a Minimally Displaced, Nonoperatively Treated Acetabular Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the long-term results for nonoperatively treated acetabular fractures. The purpose of this study was to describe the long-term survival of the native acetabulum as well as the clinical and radiographic outcome for patients with nonoperatively treated acetabular fractures. METHODS: All patients with acetabular fractures are prospectively registered in our acetabular fracture database and followed up at regular intervals for up to 20 years. We identified 236 patients (237 fractures) who had been treated nonoperatively between 1994 and 2004; 51 patients with incomplete data were excluded. For the survival analysis, 186 fractures with an average follow-up of 9 years (range, 1 to 20 years) were included. For the long-term clinical outcome, 104 patients with an average follow-up of 12.1 years (range, 9 to 20 years) were included. RESULTS: The 10-year survival of the native hips was 94% (111 hips were at risk). Eighty-nine percent of the patients had a good or excellent Harris hip score, and 88% had a good or excellent Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score. The most important negative predictor for clinical outcome and survival of the hip was a fracture step-off of ≥2 mm measured in the obturator oblique radiograph. CONCLUSIONS: Nonoperative treatment of minimally displaced acetabular fractures yields good to excellent long-term results. For patients with a questionable indication for fracture surgery, oblique radiographs (Judet views) are a helpful tool in the decision-making process, as a fracture step-off of ≥2 mm is a strong predictor for a poor clinical and radiographic result at 10 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Acetabular fracture assessment in four different pelvic trauma centers: have the Judet views become superfluous?

INTRODUCTION: The present study was designed to examine whether oblique radiographs (Judet views) in addition to 2D and 3D CT scans improved the intra- and interobserver reliability when assessing acetabular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four international orthopedic pelvic trauma centers reviewed the radiological images for 20 acetabular fracture patients. Three different image sets were made; one set containing plain radiographs including oblique (Judet) views and 2D axial CT scans. The second set contained an AP radiograph of the pelvis, without oblique views, 2D and 3D CT scans. The third set contained all the images. The image sets were evaluated in three separate sessions, for each session the raters were asked to classify the fracture according to Letournel, as well as record a number of other important radiological features concerning the fracture. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement for the Letournel classification was found to be moderate for all image sets. The image set without oblique views showed the best agreement with a kappa value of 0.60. The intra- and interobserver agreement for important modifiers were found to be substantial. The addition of oblique radiographs did not seem to increase the intra- or interobserver agreement for any of the factors evaluated except for the roof arc score. CONCLUSION: The moderate agreement found for the Letournel classification is to be expected given the complexity of the classification. The addition of oblique radiographs to the image sets does not seem to improve the reliability and thus its routine use for classification and decision making may be debated.