Disfagia esofágica secundaria a fístula aortoesofágica / Oesophageal dysphagia secondary to aortoesophageal fistula

No disponible

Características y supervivencia del carcinoma hepatocelular en hígado no cirrótico / Characteristics and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver

Introducción: las características, cribado, y supervivencia del carcinoma hepatocelular (CHC) en pacientes sin cirrosis están menos definidas. Pacientes y métodos: se recogieron retrospectivamente (enero 2004-octubre 2018) los pacientes con CHC diagnosticados citohistológicamente sin cirrosis. Analizamos sus características, tratamiento y supervivencia. Resultados: de los 332 pacientes con CHC, 25 cumplían los criterios de inclusión (7,5%). Varones: 76%. Mediana de edad: 69,9 años. El virus de la hepatitis B (VHB) fue el principal agente etiológico de hepatopatía: 32%, seguido de la esteatohepatitis no alcohólica (EHNA): 20%. La fibrosis fue leve (0-1) en el 44%. El nódulo se descubrió por ecografía de seguimiento en el 32%, en el 60% fue casual, y 8% por síntomas. El estadio de Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) fue 0 en 4%, A 88%, B 4%, y C 4%. El tratamiento inicial mayoritario fue la resección quirúrgica (76%), 8% rechazaron tratamiento, y se realizó etanolización, quimioembolización, sorafenib y tratamiento sintomático en el 4% para cada uno. El 21% de los pacientes operados presentó complicaciones, la mitad severas. La mediana de seguimiento fue 22,2 (2,9-150,6) meses, con remisión en el 56%. Mediana de supervivencia global: 57,4 +/- 29,8 meses. Supervivencia acumulada: 84% al año, 61,6% a los 3 años y 47,9% a los 5 años. Conclusión: el 7,5% de los CHC se desarrollaron sin cirrosis. El grado de fibrosis fue leve en casi la mitad. El VHB fue la causa principal, seguida de EHNA. El estadio de BCLC principal al diagnóstico fue el precoz. La cirugía fue el tratamiento más habitual. La supervivencia a los 5 años fue cercana al 50%

Introduction: the characteristics, screening, and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for patients without cirrhosis have not been fully studied. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in non-cirrhotic patients with histological HCC, between January 2004 and October 2018. Their characteristics, treatment, follow-up and overall survival were described. Results: 25 of the 332 patients with HCC met the inclusion criteria (7.5%), 76% were males and the median age was 69.9 years. The main etiology of liver disease was the hepatitis B virus (HBV) (32%), followed by non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (20%). Liver fibrosis was mild (0-1) in 44% of cases. The nodule was diagnosed by ultrasonography in 32% of cases, 60% were found incidentally and 8% due to clinical symptoms. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging was 0 in 4% of cases, A in 88%, B in 4% and C in 4%. The main initial treatment was surgical resection (76%) and 8% refused to be treated. Percutaneous ethanol injection, chemoembolization, sorafenib and palliative care were each performed in 4% of cases. There were some complications in 21% of patients treated with surgery, half of them were severe. The median follow-up was 22.2 (2.9-150.6) months and 56% were in remission and the median overall survival was 57.4 +/- 29.8 months. The overall cumulative survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 84%, 61.6% and 47.9%, respectively. Conclusion: 7.5% of HCC presented without cirrhosis and almost half of patients had mild fibrosis. HBV was the main cause of HCC, followed by NASH. The most frequent BCLC stage at diagnosis was early stage and surgery was the most common treatment. Overall cumulative survival at 5 years was almost 50%

Characteristics and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver.

INTRODUCTION: the characteristics, screening, and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for patients without cirrhosis have not been fully studied. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in non-cirrhotic patients with histological HCC, between January 2004 and October 2018. Their characteristics, treatment, follow-up and overall survival were described. RESULTS: 25 of the 332 patients with HCC met the inclusion criteria (7.5%), 76% were males and the median age was 69.9 years. The main etiology of liver disease was the hepatitis B virus (HBV) (32%), followed by non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (20%). Liver fibrosis was mild (0-1) in 44% of cases. The nodule was diagnosed by ultrasonography in 32% of cases, 60% were found incidentally and 8% due to clinical symptoms. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging was 0 in 4% of cases, A in 88%, B in 4% and C in 4%. The main initial treatment was surgical resection (76%) and 8% refused to be treated. Percutaneous ethanol injection, chemoembolization, sorafenib and palliative care were each performed in 4% of cases. There were some complications in 21% of patients treated with surgery, half of them were severe. The median follow-up was 22.2 (2.9-150.6) months and 56% were in remission and the median overall survival was 57.4 ± 29.8 months. The overall cumulative survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 84%, 61.6% and 47.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: 7.5% of HCC presented without cirrhosis and almost half of patients had mild fibrosis. HBV was the main cause of HCC, followed by NASH. The most frequent BCLC stage at diagnosis was early stage and surgery was the most common treatment. Overall cumulative survival at 5 years was almost 50%.

Macrolide use in the previous years is associated with failure to eradicate Helicobacter pylori with clarithromycin-containing regimens.

BACKGROUND: There is some evidence that prior use of macrolide antibiotics is a useful predictor of the likelihood of standard triple therapy failure in Helicobacter pylori eradication. In this study, we have evaluated whether previous intake of macrolides correlates with failure to eradicate H. pylori using two different first-line clarithromycin-containing regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 212 patients with H. pylori infection treated with one of two first-line clarithromycin-containing regimens: 108 patients treated with triple therapy for 10 days and 104 patients treated with concomitant therapy for 10 days. The intake of macrolides (clarithromycin, azithromycin, and other macrolides) prior to the eradication therapy was obtained from the electronic medical record, which contains information regarding all the medication prescribed to the patients since the year 2004. RESULTS: One hundred of 212 patients (47.2%) had received at least one treatment with macrolides during the years prior to the eradication therapy. H. pylori eradication rates were significantly lower in patients with previous use compared to patients without previous use of macrolides, both with triple therapy (60.8% vs 92.9%; P < .0001) and with concomitant therapy (85.7% vs 98.2%; P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Previous use of macrolides correlates with a low H. pylori eradication rate with triple and concomitant clarithromycin-containing regimens. In addition, our study shows that in patients without previous use of macrolides, triple therapy achieves per-protocol eradication rates over 90%.