Current practice of genomic profiling of patients with advanced solid tumours in Italy: the Italian Register of Actionable Mutations (RATIONAL) study.

BACKGROUND: The Italian Register of Actionable Mutations (RATIONAL) is a multicentric, observational study collecting next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based tumour profiling data of patients with advanced solid tumours. METHODS: The study enrols patients who had available an NGS-based tumour profiling (Pathway-A) or undergo comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) with FoundationOne CDx assays within the trial (Pathway-B). The primary endpoint was the rate of actionable mutations identified. RESULTS: Sequencing data were available for 738 patients in Pathway-A (218) and -B (520). In Pathway-A, 154/218 (70.6%) tests were performed using NGS panels ≤52 genes, and genomic alterations (GAs) were found in 164/218 (75.2%) patients. In Pathway-B, CGP revealed GAs in 512/520 (98.5%) patients. Levels I/II/III actionable GAs according to the European Society of Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) were identified in 254/554 (45.8%) patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic and breast cancer. The rate of patients with level I GAs was similar in Pathways A and B (69 versus 102). CGP in Pathway-B revealed a higher number of patients with level II/III GAs (99 versus 20) and potentially germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (58 versus 15) as compared with standard testing in Pathway-A. In patients with cancer of unknown primary, CGP detected OncoKB levels 3B/4 GAs in 31/58 (53.4%) cases. Overall, 67/573 (11.7%) of patients received targeted therapy based on genomic testing. CONCLUSION: The Italian Register of Actionable Mutations represents the first overview of genomic profiling in Italian current clinical practice and highlights the utility of CGP for identifying therapeutic targets in selected cancer patients.

Challenges in bioinformatics approaches to tumor mutation burden analysis.

Several immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have already been introduced into clinical practice or are in advanced phases of clinical experimentation. Extensive efforts are being made to identify robust biomarkers to select patients who may benefit from treatment with ICIs. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) may be a relevant biomarker of response to ICIs in different tumor types; however, its clinical use is challenged by the analytical methods required for its evaluation. The possibility of using targeted next-generation sequencing panels has been investigated as an alternative to the standard whole exome sequencing approach. However, no standardization exists in terms of genes covered, types of mutations included in the estimation of TMB, bioinformatics pipelines for data analysis, and cut-offs used to discriminate samples with high, intermediate or low TMB. Bioinformatics serve a relevant role in the analysis of targeted sequencing data and its standardization is essential to deliver a reliable test in clinical practice. In the present study, cultured and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell lines were analyzed using a commercial panel for TMB testing; the results were compared with data from the literature and public databases, demonstrating a good correlation. Additionally, the correlation between high tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability was confirmed. The bioinformatics analyses were conducted using two different pipelines to highlight the challenges associated with the development of an appropriate analytical workflow.