Wrist function recovers more rapidly after volar locked plating than after external fixation but the outcomes are similar after 1 year.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Promising results have been reported after volar locked plating of unstable dorsally displaced distal radius fractures. We investigated whether volar locked plating results in better patient-perceived, objective functional and radiographic outcomes compared to the less invasive external fixation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 63 patients under 70 years of age, with an unstable extra-articular or non-comminuted intra-articular dorsally displaced distal radius fracture, were randomized to volar locked plating (n = 33) or bridging external fixation. Patient-perceived outcome was assessed with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire. RESULTS: At 3 and 6 months, the volar plate group had better DASH and PRWE scores but at 12 months the scores were similar. Objective function, measured as grip strength and range of movement, was superior in the volar plate group but the differences diminished and were small at 12 months. Axial length and volar tilt were retained slightly better in the volar plate group. INTERPRETATION: Volar plate fixation is more advantageous than external fixation, in the early rehabilitation period.

Bony Bankart is a positive predictive factor after primary shoulder dislocation.

It would be a great advantage if it were possible to categorise the patients with first time dislocations to an initial treatment with the most beneficial outcome. MRI could be a useful method for finding lesions after shoulder dislocation. Fifty-eight patients with traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation were treated by closed reduction and were examined by MRI after a maximum of 2 weeks. The hemarthrosis or effusion present in the joint after the primary dislocation could be used as a contrast for arthrography to identify the lesions present on MRI. At follow-up more than 8 years later, the MRI findings were compared to the shoulder function, shoulder stability, Rowe score and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Besides the age of the patient being above 30, the MRI findings analysed showed that an isolated fracture of the major tubercle, as well as a bony Bankart lesion are prognostic factors for a good functional result and a stable shoulder after a primary dislocation. The glenoid rim fracture was only detected on plain radiographs in 6 out of 10 findings on MRI. MRI findings of a gleniod rim fracture, equal to a bony Bankart lesion, were found to be a prognostic factor for stability and a good functional outcome.

The Bankart repair versus the Putti-Platt procedure: a randomized study with WOSI score at 10-year follow-up in 62 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This randomized study compared clinical results after surgery for posttraumatic shoulder instability with either an anatomical repair or an older, less anatomical but commonly used method. The less anatomical procedure has been considered quicker and less demanding, but it has been questioned regarding the clinical result. We therefore wanted to compare the clinical outcome of the two different procedures. Our hypothesis was that the anatomical repair would give less residual impairment postoperatively. METHODS: Patients with anterior posttraumatic shoulder instability were consecutively randomized on the day before surgery to either a Bankart repair using Mitek GI/GII anchors combined with capsular imbrication (B) (n = 33) or a Putti-Platt procedure (P) (n = 33). Follow-up was performed by examination at 2 years and using a self-evaluation score at 10 years. RESULTS: At the 2-year follow-up, we found no difference in muscle strength between patients treated with the two surgical methods and there were no statistically significant differences in the Rowe scores (mean 90 units for both groups). Compared to preoperatively, the decrease in external rotation 2 years after surgery was 10 degrees in the P group and 3 degrees in the B group (p = 0.03). 10 years after surgery, 62 of 66 patients replied to a questionnaire sent by mail. It included a self-evaluating quality of life score for shoulder instability (WOSI) for evaluation of their shoulder function. In the P group 15 patients and in the B group 19 patients reported they had experienced either a redislocation or a subluxation with a new feeling of shoulder instability. Mean WOSI score was similar in the P and B groups: 80% and 83%, respectively. The WOSI score was 87% for patients with stable shoulders (n = 28) and 77% for those with unstable shoulders (n= 34) (p = 0.005). INTERPRETATION: With assessment of pain and general shoulder function, only a small difference was found between the two methods. The WOSI scores for stable shoulders indicated that some shoulders still had impaired function even though the shoulders had become stable.

Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius.

The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) form is an established outcome questionnaire designed to measure wrist pain and disabilities in activities of daily living. We translated and validated this score for use in Sweden. The original PRWE score was translated forwards and backwards, and then the responsiveness, validity, and reliability of the Swedish version were tested in 99 patients who were recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. The patients completed the PRWE questionnaire 7 weeks and 4 to 6 months after the injury. Responsiveness was assessed by Standard Response Mean and Effect Size. Content validity was evaluated by examining the proportion of best and worse possible scores. Construct validity was assessed by comparing scores twice after the injury and by comparing patients with fractures of different severity. Criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the PRWE with another upper extremity score: the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score. Reliability was evaluated with a test-retest and by internal consistency. Responsiveness was excellent (SRM = 1.4-1.7, ES = 1.3). Five patients reported the best possible result after 4 to 6 months but none at 7 weeks, and no patient reported the worst score at any time. The PRWE score corresponded well with improvement and showed good correlation with severity of fracture. The PRWE showed a strong correlation with DASH score (Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.86). Intraobserver reliability of the test-retest and internal consistency was good (Kendall W coefficient = 0.79, Spearman's rank coefficient = 0.99, Cronbach's alpha = 0.94-0.97). We found this Swedish version of the PRWE to be responsive, valid, and reliable for evaluating the patient-rated outcome after a fracture of the distal radius.

Medium-term results after primary hemiarthroplasty for comminute proximal humerus fractures: a study of 46 patients followed up for an average of 4.4 years.

This study investigated 82 patients who underwent primary hemiarthroplasty for a severely displaced proximal humerus fracture at Danderyd Hospital between 1989 and 2002. According to the Neer classification system, fractures were 2-part in 2, 3-part in 20, and 4-part in 60. The prostheses used were 12 Neer-II, 39 Global, and 31 Bigliani-Flatow. Follow-up time averaged 4.4 years (range, 1-14 years). Twenty-two patients died, 9 were contacted by phone, and 5 were lost to follow-up. Forty-six patients underwent clinical examination, including the Constant score (CS) and radiographic examination. Mean CS for all patients was 42 of 100 points (range, 11-83 points). Radiologic evaluation revealed that 24 prostheses had migrated superiorly; this finding decreased the CS significantly. Ectopic bone developed in 25 patients, 16 had glenoid erosion, and 5 had displaced tuberosities; no correlation was found with the CS. Hemiarthroplasty usually prevented shoulder pain, but most patients had moderate function and poor strength. The reduced function appeared to be related to a lack of rotator cuff integrity.

Patient-perceived outcome after displaced distal radius fractures. A comparison between radiological parameters, objective physical variables, and the DASH score.

Outcome after distal radius fractures has traditionally been measured by radiological parameters and objective physical variables. To what extent these measurements reflect outcome as perceived by the patient has been questioned. We evaluated the association between radiological position, objective physical result (grip strength and range of movement), and the patient-perceived outcome, measured with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcome (DASH) score, in 78 patients with a healed unilateral distal radius fracture treated with either closed reduction and plaster splint or external fixation. Fifty-seven females and 21 males (median age 59 yr; range, 22-95) were retrospectively assessed after a mean of 22 months and the mean DASH score was 13 points. Linear correlations between final radiological and objective physical measurements and DASH score were weak or insignificant. However, radial shortening > or = 2mm, dorsal angulation >15 degrees, and radial angulation >10 degrees were each significantly associated with a poorer DASH score. Reduced grip strength, extension, and ulnar deviation correlated with a poorer DASH score. In conclusion, we found that better final radiological and objective physical results were associated with a better patient-perceived outcome, as measured by the DASH score, in this patient group.