Pressure versus volume controlled modes in invasive mechanical ventilation.

The first generation of mechanical ventilators were controlled and cycled by pressure. Unfortunately, they did not allow control of the delivered tidal volume under changes in the dynamics of the respiratory system. This led to a second generation of ventilators that allowed volume control, hence favoring the ventilatory strategy based on normalization of the arterial gases. Studies conducted in the 1980s which related lung injury to the high ventilator pressures utilized while treating acute respiratory distress syndrome patients renewed interest in pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation. In addition, new evidence became available, leading to the development of pulmonary protective strategies aiming at preventing the progression of ventilator-induced lung injury. This review provides a detailed description of the control of pressure or volume using certain ventilatory modes, and offers a general view of their advantages and disadvantages, based on the latest available evidence.

Consenso argentino de ventilación no invasiva / Argentine consensus of non-invasive ventilation

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is nowadays increasingly used. The significant decrease in tracheal intubation related complications makes it particularly attractive in patients with moderately acute respiratory failure (ARF) who still have some degree of respiratory autonomy. It has also been used to support patients with chronic respiratory failure. However, final outcomes are variable according to the conditions which determined its application. This Consensus was performed in order to review the evidence supporting the use of positive pressure NIV. The patho-physiological background of NIV and the equipment required technology are described. Available evidence clearly suggests benefits of NIV in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in cardiogenic pulmonary edema (Recommendation A). When considering ARF in the setting of acute respiratory distress syndrome results are uncertain, unless dealing with immunosupressed patients (Recommendation B). Positive results are also shown in weaning of mechanical ventilation (MV), particularly regarding acute exacerbation of COPD patients (Recommendation A). An improved quality of life in chronic respiratory failure and a longer survival in restrictive disorders has also been shown (Recommendation B) while its benefit in stable COPD patients is still controversial (Recommendation C). NIV should be performed according to pre-established standards. A revision of NIV related complications is performed and the cost-benefit comparison with invasive MV is also considered.

La ventilación no invasiva (VNI) ha alcanzado notable difusión en los últimos años. El ahorro delas complicaciones causadas por la intubación traqueal la hace especialmente atractiva en pacientesque presentan insuficiencia respiratoria aguda (IRA) no muy grave y que conservan cierta autonomía respiratoria.También se han descripto efectos terapéuticos en pacientes con insuficiencia respiratoria crónica de etiologías diversas. No obstante, los resultados obtenidos son variables según las circunstancias que motivan su aplicación. A fin de revisar la evidencia a favor de su uso se elaboró este Consenso referido particularmente a la VNI a presión positiva. Se describen su fundamento fisiopatológico, esencial para su correcta aplicación, y elequipamiento necesario para implementarla. La evidencia existente en la literatura establece definida utilidad de la VNI en la exacerbación de la EPOC y en el edema agudo de pulmón cardiogénico (Recomendación A).Su beneficio es aún incierto en pacientes con IRA secundaria a síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda, salvoen el subgrupo de pacientes inmunosuprimidos (Recomendación B). Los resultados son también favorablesen la desvinculación de la asistencia respiratoria mecánica (ARM), especialmente en pacientes ventilados por exacerbación de EPOC (Recomendación A). En la insuficiencia respiratoria crónica se ha hallado mejoría en la calidad de vida y mayor sobrevida en pacientes con enfermedades restrictivas (Recomendación B), mientrasque existe aún controversia sobre su utilidad en pacientes con EPOC estable (Recomendación C). La VNI debeser aplicada con estándares de cuidados que son establecidos. Se revisan las eventuales complicaciones derivadasde su uso y el beneficio costo-efectividad ahorrando recursos de mayor complejidad y disminuyendolos riesgos que implica la ARM invasiva.

Consenso argentino de ventilación no invasiva / Argentine consensus of non-invasive ventilation

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is nowadays increasingly used. The significant decrease in tracheal intubation related complications makes it particularly attractive in patients with moderately acute respiratory failure (ARF) who still have some degree of respiratory autonomy. It has also been used to support patients with chronic respiratory failure. However, final outcomes are variable according to the conditions which determined its application. This Consensus was performed in order to review the evidence supporting the use of positive pressure NIV. The patho-physiological background of NIV and the equipment required technology are described. Available evidence clearly suggests benefits of NIV in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in cardiogenic pulmonary edema (Recommendation A). When considering ARF in the setting of acute respiratory distress syndrome results are uncertain, unless dealing with immunosupressed patients (Recommendation B). Positive results are also shown in weaning of mechanical ventilation (MV), particularly regarding acute exacerbation of COPD patients (Recommendation A). An improved quality of life in chronic respiratory failure and a longer survival in restrictive disorders has also been shown (Recommendation B) while its benefit in stable COPD patients is still controversial (Recommendation C). NIV should be performed according to pre-established standards. A revision of NIV related complications is performed and the cost-benefit comparison with invasive MV is also considered.(AU)

La ventilación no invasiva (VNI) ha alcanzado notable difusión en los últimos años. El ahorro delas complicaciones causadas por la intubación traqueal la hace especialmente atractiva en pacientesque presentan insuficiencia respiratoria aguda (IRA) no muy grave y que conservan cierta autonomía respiratoria.También se han descripto efectos terapéuticos en pacientes con insuficiencia respiratoria crónica de etiologías diversas. No obstante, los resultados obtenidos son variables según las circunstancias que motivan su aplicación. A fin de revisar la evidencia a favor de su uso se elaboró este Consenso referido particularmente a la VNI a presión positiva. Se describen su fundamento fisiopatológico, esencial para su correcta aplicación, y elequipamiento necesario para implementarla. La evidencia existente en la literatura establece definida utilidad de la VNI en la exacerbación de la EPOC y en el edema agudo de pulmón cardiogénico (Recomendación A).Su beneficio es aún incierto en pacientes con IRA secundaria a síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda, salvoen el subgrupo de pacientes inmunosuprimidos (Recomendación B). Los resultados son también favorablesen la desvinculación de la asistencia respiratoria mecánica (ARM), especialmente en pacientes ventilados por exacerbación de EPOC (Recomendación A). En la insuficiencia respiratoria crónica se ha hallado mejoría en la calidad de vida y mayor sobrevida en pacientes con enfermedades restrictivas (Recomendación B), mientrasque existe aún controversia sobre su utilidad en pacientes con EPOC estable (Recomendación C). La VNI debeser aplicada con estándares de cuidados que son establecidos. Se revisan las eventuales complicaciones derivadasde su uso y el beneficio costo-efectividad ahorrando recursos de mayor complejidad y disminuyendolos riesgos que implica la ARM invasiva.(AU)

[Domiciliary noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in chronic alveolar hypoventilation]. / Ventilación domiciliaria no invasiva a presión positiva en hipoventilación alveolar crónica.

Effectiveness of treatment with domiciliary nocturnal noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is analyzed in a group of patients with chronic alveolar hypoventilation of different etiologies. It was applied with two levels of pressure (BiPAP) via nasal mask. Criteria for evaluation were symptomatology and improvement in gas exchange. Data were analyzed by Student t tests. A total of 13 patients were included, mean age 55.7 range 20 to 76 years (5 male 8 female). Main diagnosis was tuberculosis in 6, four of them having had surgical procedure (thoracoplasty 2, frenicectomy 1 and neumonectomy 1), myopathy 3 (myasthenia gravis 1, muscular dystrophy 1 and diaphragmatic paralysis 1), obesity-hypoventilation syndrome 1, escoliosis 1, bronchiectasis 1 and cystic fibrosis 1. These last two patients were on waiting list for lung transplantation. At the moment of consultation, the symptoms were: dysnea 13/13 (100%), astenia 13/13 (100%), hypersomnolency 10/13 (77%), cephalea 9/13 (69%), leg edema 6/13 (46%), loss of memory 6/13 (46%). Regarding gas exchange, they showed hypoxemia and hypercapnia. Mean follow up was of 2.2 years (range 6 months to 4 years). Within the year, all 13 patients became less dyspneic. Astenia, hypersomnolency, cephalea, leg edema and memory loss disappeared. Improvement in gas exchange was: PaO2/FiO2 from 269 +/- 65.4 (basal) to 336.7 +/- 75.3 post-treatment (p = 0.0018). PaCO2 from 70.77 +/- 25.48 mmHg (basal) to 46.77 +/- 8.14 mmHg (p = 0.0013). Ventilatory support was discontinued en 5 patients: three because of pneumonia requiring intubation and conventional mechanical ventilation, two of them died and one is still with tracheostomy; One patient with bronchiectasis and one with cystic fibrosis were transplanted. The remaining eight patients are stable. In conclusion, chronic alveolar hypoventilation can be effectively treated with domiciliary nocturnal noninvasive ventilation. Long term improvement in symptomatology and arterial blood gases can be obtained without significant complications.

Ventilación domiciliaria no invasiva a presión positiva en hipoventilación alveolar crónica. / [Domiciliary noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in chronic alveolar hypoventilation]

Effectiveness of treatment with domiciliary nocturnal noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is analyzed in a group of patients with chronic alveolar hypoventilation of different etiologies. It was applied with two levels of pressure (BiPAP) via nasal mask. Criteria for evaluation were symptomatology and improvement in gas exchange. Data were analyzed by Student t tests. A total of 13 patients were included, mean age 55.7 range 20 to 76 years (5 male 8 female). Main diagnosis was tuberculosis in 6, four of them having had surgical procedure (thoracoplasty 2, frenicectomy 1 and neumonectomy 1), myopathy 3 (myasthenia gravis 1, muscular dystrophy 1 and diaphragmatic paralysis 1), obesity-hypoventilation syndrome 1, escoliosis 1, bronchiectasis 1 and cystic fibrosis 1. These last two patients were on waiting list for lung transplantation. At the moment of consultation, the symptoms were: dysnea 13/13 (100

), astenia 13/13 (100

), hypersomnolency 10/13 (77

), cephalea 9/13 (69

), leg edema 6/13 (46

), loss of memory 6/13 (46

). Regarding gas exchange, they showed hypoxemia and hypercapnia. Mean follow up was of 2.2 years (range 6 months to 4 years). Within the year, all 13 patients became less dyspneic. Astenia, hypersomnolency, cephalea, leg edema and memory loss disappeared. Improvement in gas exchange was: PaO2/FiO2 from 269 +/- 65.4 (basal) to 336.7 +/- 75.3 post-treatment (p = 0.0018). PaCO2 from 70.77 +/- 25.48 mmHg (basal) to 46.77 +/- 8.14 mmHg (p = 0.0013). Ventilatory support was discontinued en 5 patients: three because of pneumonia requiring intubation and conventional mechanical ventilation, two of them died and one is still with tracheostomy; One patient with bronchiectasis and one with cystic fibrosis were transplanted. The remaining eight patients are stable. In conclusion, chronic alveolar hypoventilation can be effectively treated with domiciliary nocturnal noninvasive ventilation. Long term improvement in symptomatology and arterial blood gases can be obtained without significant complications.

[Non invasive ventilation in acute respiratory insufficiency: an alternative]. / Ventilación no invasiva en la insuficiencia respiratoria aguda: otra alternativa.

UNLABELLED: Effectiveness of non invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) was prospectively evaluated in 22 selected patients with acute respiratory failure, meeting criteria for orotracheal intubation and conventional mechanical ventilation. Patients were divided in two groups: group A (17 patients) with initial PaCO2 above 45 mm Hg and group B (5 patients) with initial PaCO2 below 45 mmHg. NIPPV was administered with 2 levels of pressure either by nasal or facial mask. Respiratory rate (RR), arterial blood pH, PaCO2 and PaO2/FiO2 were registered pretreatment, 1 hour and 24 hours after NIPPV. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA test, p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In group A there was a reduction in RR (X +/- DS) from 31.2 +/- 8.2 to 24.7 +/- 8.2 at one hour (h) (p = 0.02) and to 23.4 +/- 6.5 at 24 hs (p = 0.01), pH change from 7.33 +/- 0.07 to 7.37 +/- 0.07 at one hour (p = 0.13) and to 7.40 +/- 0.07 at 24 hs (p = 0.01), a PaCO2 change from 69.5 +/- 19.6 to 57.8 +/- 16.9 at one hour (p = 0.06) and to 54 +/- 13 at 24 hs (p = 0.02), and PaO2/FiO2 change from 187.3 +/- 60.2 to 223.9 +/- 6.5 at one hour (p = 0.12) and to 245.8 +/- 75 at 24 hs (p = 0.03). In group B there was a change in RR from 33 +/- 16.3 to 26.6 +/- 12.5 at one hour (p = 0.46) and to 21.3 +/- 4.2 at 24 hs (p = 0.27), PaO2/FiO2 change from 113.4 +/- 31 to 137.8 +/- 57.2 at one hour (p = 0.44) and to 208.7 +/- 51.2 at 24 hs (p = 0.03). Only two patients in group A and one in group B were converted to conventional ARM. CONCLUSION: 1) NIPPV is a therapeutic alternative for selective patients with acute respiratory insufficiency and may reduce known morbidity of conventional mechanical ventilation. 2) In the group with hypercapnic acute respiratory failure the improvement in respiratory function begins with an immediate reduction in RR. Significant improvement in arterial blood gases usually occurs within 24 hours of NIPPV.