KAP-COVIDGLOBAL: a multinational survey of the levels and determinants of public knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: The adherence to public health recommendations to control COVID-19 spread is influenced by public knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP). We performed this cross-sectional study to assess the levels and determinants of public KAP towards COVID-19 in a large, multinational sample. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study (survey). SETTING: The questionnaire was distributed to potential respondents via online platforms. PARTICIPANTS: 71 890 individuals from 22 countries. METHODS: We formulated a four-section questionnaire in English, followed by validation and translation into seven languages. The questionnaire was distributed (May to June 2020) and each participant received a score for each KAP section. RESULTS: Overall, the participants had fair knowledge (mean score: 19.24±3.59) and attitudes (3.72±2.31) and good practices (12.12±1.83) regarding COVID-19. About 92% reported moderate to high compliance with national lockdown. However, significant gaps were observed: only 68.2% knew that infected individuals may be asymptomatic; 45.4% believed that antibiotics are an effective treatment; and 55.4% stated that a vaccine has been developed (at the time of data collection). 71.9% believed or were uncertain that COVID-19 is a global conspiracy; 36.8% and 51% were afraid of contacting doctors and Chinese people, respectively. Further, 66.4% reported the pandemic had moderate to high negative effects on their mental health. Female gender, higher education and urban residents had significantly (p≤0.001) higher knowledge and practice scores. Further, we observed significant correlations between all KAP scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although the public have fair/good knowledge and practices regarding COVID-19, significant gaps should be addressed. Future awareness efforts should target less advantaged groups and future studies should develop new strategies to tackle COVID-19 negative mental health effects.

The effect of antenatal exercise on delivery outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Practicing different forms of exercises during pregnancy could have beneficial effects on maternal outcomes during labor. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of antenatal exercise on the duration of the delivery. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic databases including Web of Science, SCOPUS, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and PubMed were searched using the relevant keywords during August 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any type of antenatal exercise versus no exercise in women who had vaginal delivery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted from eligible studies and pooled in a meta-analysis model. Mean Difference (MD) was used in continuous outcomes, while Risk Ratio (RR) was used to deal with dichotomous outcomes. The main outcome was the duration of the first and second stages of labor while the secondary outcomes included the rate of perineal lacerations and analgesia request by women. RESULTS: Exercise significantly reduced the duration of second stage of labor (SMD= -0.82, 95 % CI [-1.48, -0.16], p = 0.01). No significant difference was noticed regarding the duration of the first stage of labor, perineal lacerations and request for analgesia. CONCLUSION: Antenatal exercise could reduce the duration of the second stage of labor with racial differences.