[Management of bone metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer]. / Prise en charge des métastases osseuses du cancer pulmonaire non à petites cellules.

Lung cancer is notoriously known for its predisposition to metastasize to the bones. Diagnostic tools, including positron emission tomography coupled with computed tomography, offer increased sensitivity in detecting bone infiltration. Management strategies encompass a multidisciplinary approach, including pharmacological pain management, anti-resorptive therapy, radiotherapy, interventional techniques, and surgery. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the incidence and distribution of bone metastases, skeletal-related events (SRE), diagnostic imaging techniques, and contemporary therapeutic strategies to prevent SRE. Systemic anticancer therapy and pain management, although crucial for treating BM, are not discussed in this article.

Le cancer du poumon est notoirement connu pour sa prédisposition à métastaser dans les os. Les outils diagnostiques, notamment la tomographie par émission de positrons couplée à la tomodensitométrie, offrent une sensibilité accrue pour détecter l'infiltration osseuse. Les stratégies de prise en charge englobent une approche multidisciplinaire, comprenant le traitement médicamenteux de la douleur, la thérapie antirésorptive, la radiothérapie, les techniques interventionnelles ainsi que la chirurgie. Cet article propose une analyse approfondie de l'incidence et de la distribution des métastases osseuses (MO), des événements liés au squelette (SRE), des techniques d'imagerie diagnostique et des stratégies thérapeutiques contemporaines pour prévenir les SRE. Le traitement systémique anticancéreux et la gestion de la douleur, bien que cruciaux pour traiter les MO, ne sont pas discutés dans cet article.

Primary prophylaxis with mTOR inhibitor enhances T cell effector function and prevents heart transplant rejection during talimogene laherparepvec therapy of squamous cell carcinoma.

The application of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition (mTORi) as primary prophylactic therapy to optimize T cell effector function while preserving allograft tolerance remains challenging. Here, we present a comprehensive two-step therapeutic approach in a male patient with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and heart transplantation followed with concomitant longitudinal analysis of systemic immunologic changes. In the first step, calcineurin inhibitor/ mycophenolic acid is replaced by the mTORi everolimus to achieve an improved effector T cell status with increased cytotoxic activity (perforin, granzyme), enhanced proliferation (Ki67) and upregulated activation markers (CD38, CD69). In the second step, talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) injection further enhances effector function by switching CD4 and CD8 cells from central memory to effector memory profiles, enhancing Th1 responses, and boosting cytotoxic and proliferative activities. In addition, cytokine release (IL-6, IL-18, sCD25, CCL-2, CCL-4) is enhanced and the frequency of circulating regulatory T cells is increased. Notably, no histologic signs of allograft rejection are observed in consecutive end-myocardial biopsies. These findings provide valuable insights into the dynamics of T cell activation and differentiation and suggest that timely initiation of mTORi-based primary prophylaxis may provide a dual benefit of revitalizing T cell function while maintaining allograft tolerance.

[Oncology: what's new in 2023]. / Oncologie: ce qui a changé en 2023.

The oncology field continues its remarkable evolution over the years, with promising advances leading to innovative and individualized treatments. The development of new molecules, the identification of new therapeutic targets and the search for new sequences or combinations promise to revolutionize cancer treatments and contribute to improving survival rates, patients' quality of life and to open new perspective in oncology research. In this article, the newest data released in 2023 are reviewed.

Le domaine de l'oncologie poursuit son évolution remarquable au fil des années, avec des avancées prometteuses ouvrant la voie à des traitements novateurs et individualisés. L'élaboration de nouvelles molécules, l'identification de nouvelles cibles thérapeutiques et la recherche de nouvelles séquences ou combinaisons de traitements promettent de révolutionner la prise en charge du cancer et de contribuer à améliorer les taux de survie, la qualité de vie des patients et à ouvrir de nouvelles perspectives dans la recherche en oncologie. Dans cet article, les nouveautés parues en 2023 sont passées en revue.

[Oncology: what's new in 2022]. / Oncologie : ce qui a changé en 2022.

The past year has brought several innovations in medical oncology, opening up promising new options for many solid tumors, both localized and metastatic. Immunotherapy, a real spearhead of emerging therapies in metastatic diseases, is seeing its use extend to adjuvant and neoadjuvant modalities, particularly in colon and lung cancers. 2022 also sees a great deal of focus on targeted therapies, as well as on antibody-drug conjugates, which creates new standards in both breast and lung cancers. Here we present the major advances in solid tumors.

L'année écoulée a apporté son lot d'innovations en oncologie médicale, ouvrant de nouvelles options prometteuses pour bon nombre de tumeurs solides, qu'elles soient localisées ou métastatiques. L'immunothérapie, véritable fer de lance des thérapies émergentes dans les maladies métastatiques, voit son usage s'étendre à des modalités adjuvantes et néoadjuvantes, notamment dans les cancers du côlon et du poumon. 2022 donne également la part belle aux thérapies ciblées mais aussi aux conjuguées anticorps-médicaments qui apportent de nouveaux standards tant pour les cancers du sein que du poumon. Nous vous présentons ici les avancées majeures concernant les tumeurs solides.

[Targeted therapies and non-small cell carcinomas : novelties]. / Thérapies ciblées et carcinomes non à petites cellules : nouveautés.

In recent years, new therapeutic strategies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been developed, stemming from a better understanding of oncogenic signaling pathways. The analysis of the alterations of genes involved in NSCLC oncogenesis is now an integral part of the diagnostic approach and opens the way to so-called "targeted" therapies. In this article, we will share the latest therapeutic advances by focusing on alterations of HER2, MET, EGFR and KRAS genes, for which new dedicated treatments have become available.

Au cours de ces dernières années, de nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques pour le cancer du poumon non à petites cellules (CPNPC) se sont développées, découlant d'une meilleure compréhension des voies de signalisation oncogéniques. L'analyse des altérations de gènes impliqués dans le développement de ce sous-type de maladie oncologique fait désormais partie intégrante de la démarche diagnostique et ouvre la voie à des thérapies dites « ciblées ¼. Nous partagerons dans cet article les dernières avancées thérapeutiques en nous intéressant aux altérations des gènes HER2, MET, EGFR et KRAS, pour lesquelles de nouveaux traitements dédiés sont disponibles.

[Small-cell lung cancer: management and novelties]. / Cancer du poumon à petites cellules†: prise en charge et nouveautés.

Small cell lung cancer is a recalcitrant malignancy with 5-year survival rates of less than 20%. In the majority of cases, patients have metastatic disease at diagnosis despite the new screening method by low-dose CT-scan. The high throughput sequencing has deepened our understanding of its biology. While the treatment of localized disease has changed little, the arrival of immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the management of extensive disease. At the same time, new strategies involving certain potential genetic targets are being analyzed on a large scale that could become valuable therapeutic alternatives in the future. Radiation therapy remains a very useful therapeutic modality in all stages of the disease. This article aims to review the epidemiology, molecular pathology, management and innovative therapies in small-cell lung cancer.

Le cancer pulmonaire à petites cellules (CPPC) est une tumeur récalcitrante avec une survie à 5 ans de moins de 20 %. Il est fréquemment découvert à un stade métastatique malgré le nouveau dépistage par computed tomography scan low-dose. Le séquençage à haut débit a permis d'approfondir notre compréhension de sa biologie. Bien que le traitement du CPPC localisé ait peu évolué, l'immunothérapie par inhibiteurs des points de contrôle a révolutionné la prise en charge de la maladie métastatique. Parallèlement, de nouvelles stratégies impliquant certaines cibles génétiques potentielles sont en cours d'évaluation et pourraient se révéler précieuses à l'avenir. La radiothérapie reste très utile à tous les stades de la maladie. Cet article passe en revue l'épidémiologie, la pathologie moléculaire, la prise en charge et les thérapies novatrices dans le CPPC.

[Oncology, what's new in 2018]. / Oncologie.

The year 2018 has been incredibly prolific regarding novelties. Several studies have given impressive results and offer new anticancer perspectives. Immunotherapy is gaining more and more place defining a new standard of care for different types of cancer. In parallel with a new approach combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy that is emerging, new forms of adoptive immunotherapy are on the path of approval by regulatory authorities. At the decision-making level, a large somatic genetic analysis is becoming dominant, whereas the addition of more specific biomarkers is still needed regarding immunotherapy. This article aims to summarize the significant new developments in oncology for 2018 concerning the five most common cancers and adoptive cellular immunotherapy.

L'année 2018 a été extrêmement prolifique en termes de nouveautés. Plusieurs études ont amené des résultats intéressants et offrent de nouvelles perspectives anticancéreuses. L'immunothérapie prend de plus en plus de place définissant un nouveau standard pour le traitement des différents types de cancer. En parallèle d'une nouvelle approche combinant l'immunothérapie et la chimiothérapie qui voit le jour, des nouvelles formes d'immunothérapie adoptive se situent sur la voie d'approbation par les autorités réglementaires. Sur le plan décisionnel, l'analyse génétique somatique large des tumeurs devient prépondérante, alors que l'addition de biomarqueurs plus spécifiques est encore nécessaire concernant l'immunothérapie. Cet article a pour but de résumer les nouveautés majeures survenues en oncologie pour 2018 concernant les cinq cancers les plus fréquents et l'immunothérapie cellulaire adoptive.

Porcine pulmonary valve decellularization with NaOH-based vs detergent process: preliminary in vitro and in vivo assessments.

BACKGROUND: Glutaraldehyde fixed xenogeneic heart valve prosthesis are hindered by calcification and lack of growth potential. The aim of tissue decellularization is to remove tissue antigenicity, avoiding the use of glutaraldehyde and improve valve integration with low inflammation and host cell recolonization. In this preliminary study, we investigated the efficacy of a NaOH-based process for decellularization and biocompatibility improvement of porcine pulmonary heart valves in comparison to a detergent-based process (SDS-SDC0, 5%). METHODS: Native cryopreserved porcine pulmonary heart valves were treated with detergent and NaOH-based processes. Decellularization was assessed by Hematoxylin and eosin/DAPI/alpha-gal/SLA-I staining and DNA quantification of native and processed leaflets, walls and muscles. Elongation stress test investigated mechanical integrity of leaflets and walls (n = 3 tests/valve component) of valves in the native and treated groups (n = 4/group). Biochemical integrity (collagen/elastin/glycosaminoglycans content) of leaflet-wall and muscle of the valves (n = 4/group) was assessed and compared between groups with trichrome staining (Sirius Red/Miller/Alcian blue). Secondly, a preliminary in vivo study assessed biocompatibility (CD3 and CD68 immunostaining) and remodeling (Hematoxylin and eosin/CD31 and ASMA immunofluorescent staining) of NaOH processed valves implanted in orthotopic position in young Landrace pigs, at 1 (n = 1) and 3 months (n = 2). RESULTS: Decellularization was better achieved with the NaOH-based process (92% vs 69% DNA reduction in the wall). Both treatments did not significantly alter mechanical properties. The detergent-based process induced a significant loss of glycosaminoglycans (p < 0,05). In vivo, explanted valves exhibited normal morphology without any sign of graft dilatation, degeneration or rejection. Low inflammation was noticed at one and three months follow-up (1,8 +/- 3,03 and 0,9836 +/- 1,3605 CD3 cells/0,12 mm2 in the leaflets). In one animal, at three months we documented minimal calcification in the area of sinus leaflet and in one, microthrombi formation on the leaflet surface at 1 month. The endoluminal side of the valves showed partial reendothelialization. CONCLUSIONS: NaOH-based process offers better porcine pulmonary valve decellularization than the detergent process. In vivo, the NaOH processed valves showed low inflammatory response at 3 months and partial recellularization. Regarding additional property of securing, this treatment should be considered for the new generation of heart valves prosthesis. Graphical abstract of the study.

Enhanced vascular regeneration with chemically/physically treated bovine/human pericardium in rodents.

BACKGROUND: Glutaraldehyde-treated pericardia for cardiovascular applications have poor long-term clinical results. The efficacy of a combined physical/chemical treatment to improve pericardium biocompatibility and vascular regeneration was assessed and compared with detergent treatment and two commercial bovine pericardia: PeriGuard (DGBP) and Edwards pericardium (nDGBP). The physical and chemical process was applied to bovine and human pericardia (DBP-DHP), and the detergent process was applied to bovine (DDBP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Native (NBP) and treated bovine tissues were assessed for decellularization (HE/DAPI/DNA/α-Gal and MHC-1 staining) and mechanical integrity ex vivo. Twenty Wistar rats received subcutaneous patches of each bovine tissue to assess immunogenic response up to 4 months (flow cytometry). Ten additional rats received four subcutaneous bovine-treated patches (one/condition) to evaluate the inflammatory reaction (CD3/CD68 immunostaining), calcification (von Kossa staining/calcium quantification), and integration assessment (Hematoxylin and eosin staining). Finally, 15 rodents received a patch on the aorta (DBP n = 5, DHP n = 5, and DGBP n = 5), and vascular biocompatibility and arterial wall regeneration were assessed after 4 months (CD3/CD68/CD31/ASMA and Miller staining). RESULTS: DBP reached the higher level of decellularization, no immunogenic response whereas maintaining mechanical properties. DBP induced the lowest level grade of inflammation after 2 months (P < 0.05) concomitantly for better remodeling. No complications occurred with DBP and DHP where vascular regeneration was confirmed. Moreover, they induced a low level of CD3/CD68 infiltrations. CONCLUSIONS: This process significantly reduces immunogenicity and improves biocompatibility of bovine and human pericardia for better vascular regeneration.